Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence Bitgham e e McHaleLLP attorneys a t a w <4:\\f;f; .!)/ August 4, 200\~J~ ~."'''';>/Y ~ ,",~t RECENE\) Ms. Angie Conn ("$>1 City of Carmel -:\ One Civic Square ,< \. DOCS \ " Carmel, IN 46032 '<~>, , RE: Carmel Drive Office Building - Docket #05~'^ Mary E. Solada Partner msolada@binghammchale.com Following please find our responses to your letter dated July 11, 2005. 1. Refer to and provide the most recent covenants for Carmel Research & Development Park. The most current version in the Department's files is dated September 1982. 15-ft. side and rear yards are required by the covenants and it specifies the building-to-Iand ratio. Enclosed is the Declaration of Development Standards, Covenants and Restrictions for the Carmel Science and Technology Park (as modified). It is our intention to seek the necessary approvals (which may be limited to signage) prior to our first Plan Commission. 2. Provide a summary of the project, block development, and if part of Block 11 will be subdivided further. If so, this building site will need a minimum 100-ft. frontage, per the M-3 district requirements. The project will be a two-story office building. There are preliminary discussions and plans for possible retail uses on the north part of the site. However, at this time, there are no definite plans. The plans have been revised to provide 100 feet of frontage along Guilford Road. 3. The maximum lot coverage (buildings and pavement) for this district is 80%; please show/provide the lot coverage of this site plan. Address how this will change if/when the remaining property is developed / subdivided. A variance for lot cover may be needed in the future. The lot coverage has been added to the site plan and is approximately 65% of the area being developed. Any future development will not put this project above the required maximum coverage of 80%. 4. Provide drainage calculations. Drainage calculations have been provided to the Engineering Department and Surveyor's Office. 5. Please add Docket No. 05060042 DP Amend / ADLS to the site plan. The docket number has been added. 6. Show / label a 50-ft. front yard setback (2 times building height). The required setback has been added. Per Ordinance Chapter 20D, chart B, a 30 foot setback is required (due to the height of the building) 7. Show / label side and rear yard setbacks as 60-ft. (2 times building height). 2700 Market Tower - 1 0 West Market Street - Indianapolis Indiana 46204-4900 Telephone 317.635.8900 - Facsimile 317.236.9907 - binghammchale.com Indianapolis Jasper Noblesville' Ms. Angie Conn August 4, 2005 Page 2 e e The required setbacks have been added. Per Ordinance Chapter 20D, chart B, a 10 foot side and rear setback are required on the north and east, while a 60 foot side setback is required on the south (due to the height of the building) 8. Provide a landscape plan, addressing Chapter 20D. 07-Landscpae Standards for the M-3 District. The landscaping plan has been provided and has been revised per the Urban Forester's comments. 9. Refer to the Chart B in the M-3 District requirements for the landscaped yard widths; 40-ft. front landscaped yard and 15-ft side/rear landscaped yards. Per Chart B of the M3 district requirements, a 15 foot front, 15 foot south side, and 10 foot north side and rear landscape yards are shown. 10. Keep plantings out of the legal drain easement. Per conversations at the Technical Advisory Committee meeting with Scott Brewer and Greg Hoyes, no additional plantings will be planted within the legal drain easement. The existing vegetation will remain to provide a visual buffer. 11. A solid visual buffer or screen is required along the south property line, adjacent to the condominiums. (May include, but not limited to a minimum offive-foot (5') high solid evergreen hedge; stone, brick or wood fence; earth mounding or other suitable material or any combination a minimum of five (5) feet in height. If a chain link fence (with or without screen slats) is used, a minimum of five-foot (5') high solid evergreen hedge shall be provided on the residential or commercial side of the fence.) We have been requested by the County Surveyor not to add new plantings to the legal drain easement. The current tree line does constitute a significant visual screen along the south property line. 12. Provide a landscape plan, addressing Chapter 20D. 07-Landscape Standards for the M-3 District. The landscaping plan has been provided and has been revised per the Urban Forester's comments. 13. Please submit the Findings of Fact sheet that accompanies the Development Plan application, which can be found at http://www.ci.carmel.in.us/services/DOCS/DOCSA.htm. The finding of facts sheet was submitted under separate cover. 14. Per M-3 requirements, show one loading dock area or one ground level loading doors area. A loading dock area has been indicated along the south side drive. 15. Provide any fencing details and location. No fencing is proposed for this project. 16. Please show black line elevations with outline of mechanical equipment behind screening wall. The elevations and outline of mechanical screening have been added. 17. Please clarify the dumpster location. The dumpster location is indicated on the site plan. #977353 -Carmel Sign Ordinance e e Page 1 of2 Conn, Angelina V From: Conn, Angelina V Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 11 :36 AM To: 'Annemarie R. Varga' Cc: Griffin, Matt L; Littlejohn, David W Subject: RE: Carmel Sign Ordinance & Carmel Science & Tech park, Blk 11 - Office Bldg Annemarie: definitely, the first variance will be to have 2 wall signs on one frontage ( 2 signs for one frontage can be a combo of a wall sign and a ground sign per 25.07.02-10.b). if the sign areas meet the ordinance sign chart, then no variances will be needed for wall sign area. thank you for updating me on the number of tenants, which changes how the 1 building is viewed. it can now be considered a multi-tenant building complex, since it has 7 tenants, as well as a multi-tenant multi-level bldg. When reading the sign ordinance, please note that a multi-tenant directory sign is different than a Center Identification ground sign. The site is still only allowed to have 2 tenant directory signs..... (the multi-tenant building complex allows for 1 complex directory sign, while the multi-tenant multi-level building allows for a max. of 2 multi-tenant building complex directory signs, due to having 2 separate parking areas.) The ground signs proposed are all multi-tenant directory ground signs. there are height and sign area restrictions on these, which may require additional variance for sign height and sign area.... There is an option to have a center Identification ground sign with changeable copy below (not to exceed 2/3 of the sign area). this changeable copy may be the tenant names. this would allow you to have 3 ground signs. You will have to redesign the ground signs....just another option..... Hope this helps youl If not, we can discuss more by phone or e-mail. Sincerely, Angie Conn Planning Administrator Division of Planning & Zoning Department of Community Services City of Carmel One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 P 317.571.2417 f 317.571.2426 www.carmel.in.gov aconn@carmel.in.gov -----Original Message----- From: Annemarie R. Varga [mailto:AVarga@binghammchale.com] Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 10:46 AM To: Conn, Angelina V Subject: Carmel Sign Ordinance Hi, Angie. My name is Annemarie Varga. I'm a planner with Bingham McHale and am working with Bremner and Wiley on the proposal for an office building at the intersection of Carmel Drive and Guilford Road. It looks like they are going to need some variances for their proposed signage, and I wanted to clarify some ordinance points with you. About 3 weeks ago you sent Bob Doster an e- mail regarding the signage requirements for a multi-tenant, multi-level building. I understand from that e-mail that they are permitted the three wall signs they are proposing, provided they are appropriately sized (one identification sign per frontage - this lot has frontage on 3 streets). Where I am confused is how many free standing signs they can have in addition to their wall signs. Your e- mail points out the allowance for directory signs. Is that what the freestanding signs at the entrance 8/4/2005 e e minimum three-sets are requested to be approved, the additional sets (maximum total of two additional) must be submitted with the three required sets. 5. Please be advised that any installation of signs, walls, irrigation systems, etc. within dedicated right of way and/or dedicated easements will require a Consent to Encroach Agreement between the Owner/Developer and the City of Carmel. This Agreement requires Board of Public Works and Safety approval. 6. I am enclosing the following items for your use: · Commercial Project Approval Procedures. · Performance Release Procedure. . Permit Data, Contacts, etc. · Commercial Permitting Procedures. BONDING REQUIREMENTS 7. Upon initial review, it appears the following bonding requirements may apply to this project: Performance/Maintenance Guarantees This project may be required to provide Certified Engineer's Estimates and Performance/Maintenance Guarantees for the following improvements: · Perimeter monumentation if the monuments were not previously installed. · Perimeter concrete sidewalks/asphalt paths. · Perimeter road improvements. Provide detailed/itemized Certified Engineer's Estimates in the amount of 100% of the cost of labor and materials for the requested improvements. Provide individual Performance Guarantees in the amount of the Engineer's Estimates. When the improvements have been constructed and accepted and the Performance Guarantee is released by our BPWS, 3- Year Maintenance Guarantees will be required in the amount of 15% of the Performance amount for streets and curbs and 10% of the Performance amount for all other improvements. Street Cut/Right of Way Permit and Bonding Requirements Any work in the dedicated right of way of Carmel Drive, 122nd Street (future City Center Drive) or Guilford Road will require a Right of Way Permit. If the work is included in the scope of work of a required Performance Guarantee, a separate License and Permit Bond will not be required. If the work is not included in a Performance Guarantee, a License and Permit bond will be required. The bond amount will be determined by the number of instances of work in the right of way @ $2,000.00 per instance. Ooen oavement cuts in dedicated streets reiluire aooroval bv our Board of Public Works and Safetv. Please contact Fred Glaser, Department of Engineering Right of Way Inspector/Manager for details regarding this issue. PROJECT COMMENTS-CONSTRUCTION PLANS 8. CIOO - Title Sheet · Plans that contain the disclaimer above the certification stamp will not be approved. While this statement may apply to the contractor and his subs, this would not apply to the City of Carmel and we therefore require that you remove it from the plans. 9. Please indicate and label the right-of-way for 122nd Street and Guilford Road. 10. Any off-site easements necessary for installation of utilities must be secured prior to the Department of Engineering approving the drawings. 11. ADA ramps are required at all locations where the sidewalks or asphalt paths cross the streets. 12. Are the entrances private streets? If they are, please place "PRIVATE" label on each of them. 13. Board of Public Works and Safety approval will be required for each of the curb cuts. 14. Please delineate any curb cuts on the plan for sawcut, removal, and replacement. 15. The City would prefer to see a plan that does not introduce a new curb cut onto 122nd Street, but rather would use the existing curb cut on the south side of 122nd Street between Carmel Drive and Congressional through shared access with the REI building. 16. The department will sUfPort the curb cut onto Carmel Drive as long as it is designed to accommodate the 1220 Street and Carmel Drive intersection improvement plans. The Department requests a right turn lane and a short taper at this entrance. Full access will be allowed at the e e Carmel Drive entrance with the understanding that future Carmel Drive improvements may make this a right-in/right-out only in the future. 17. The proposed drive onto Guilford Road would be acceptable if the developer can get around all of the physical site constraints (specifically the pond, the regulated drain, and the regulated drain crossing under Guilford). It remains to be seen if the Department could support a full access at this drive location. When Guilford is improved this drive may not have a median break because of its difficult location and the apparent inability to have a complementary drive on the east side of Guilford Road to further warrant the median break. 18. As has been done on recent development projects to the south, the City will waive standard requirements for auxiliary lanes, connection of auxiliary lanes to the Lenox Trace entrance, and a passing blister for the Guilford Road entrance in consideration of a commitment of $108,000.00 for future the Guilford Road project. 19. A sidewalk or asphalt path is required along the entire Carmel Drive and Guilford Road frontales per the Alternative Transportation Plan. A sidewalk or asphalt path is required along the 122n Street frontage if not in the road proj ect. 20. The pond needs to be sized today to accommodate future potential filling as Guilford Road is improved and widened. Pond also needs to be sized such that volume is provided for detention of the fully developed right-of-way of Guilford Road. 21. Please label offset distance from Guilford Road entrance to Lenox Trace. 22. Any new pavement placed in the 122nd Street, Carmel Drive, or Guilford Road rights-of-way for each entrance up to the mainline right-of-way limit shall meet the following section: 1.5 inches HMA #11 surface on 2 inches HMA #8 binder on 3 inches HMA #5D base on 7 inches #53 stone on 4 inches #2 stone or match existing, whichever is greater. 23. Please revise plans so that the curb return radius at each of the entrance/city street intersections is 40 feet. 24. Please provide a maintenance of traffic plan. 25. Please add an Asphalt Path Detail that requires 1 inch HMA #11 surface on 2 inches HMA #8 binder on 5 inches #53 stone. 26. Please specify the width of the sidewalks to be 5 feet. Please add the following notes to the sidewalk detail: "SPACING BETWEEN TRANSVERSE JOINTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.25 TIMES WIDTH," "SIDEWALK BUlL T WITH DRIVEWAYS SHALL HA VB MINIMUM THICKNESS OF 6" OR THICKNESS OF DRIVEWAY, WHICHEVER IS GREATER," and "JOINTS SHALL BE TOOLED OR SAWED TO A DEPTH OF ~ THE SIDEWALK THICKNESS." 27. Sheets L101, L801, and L901 - Please remove these sheets from set of plans submitted for approval by Department of Engineering. The Department of Engineering does not approve the landscape plan. These comments represent the Department of Engineering's initial review of this project. We request that all responses to our comments be provided in writing. Failure to provide written responses may result in the delay of the review process. It is critical that our office be made aware of all modifications made on the plans being resubmitted, particularly if any such changes are considered "new" or fall outside of our previous reviews. Please provide revised plans including all revisions. Please notify us of any changes and specifically state any changes, including changes resulting from Plan Commission, BZA or other committee meetings. All bonds and performance guarantees must be posted prior to Engineering Department approval of construction plans. Also, Board of Public Works and Safety approvals and any other governing agency approvals (if required) must be obtained prior to Engineering Department approval. The Department reserves the right to provide additional comments based on subsequent reviews and on the grading and drainage system upon receipt of drainage calculations and more detailed construction drawings that provide grading elevations, pipe sizing and invert elevations. These comments may affect the drainage system layout and/or the development plan. 07/15/2005 08:55 ... ... 3177769628 e HAMILTON CO SUiliVOR PAGE 02/02 6. The detention for this site is provided for in the W.R. Fertig Regional Detention pond on tbis site. 7. The HCSO will require an engineer certifictUetter that no detention volume will be lost in the Regional Detention Basin with this project. 8. The HCSO would strongly suggest bollards or guardrail along both entrances on Guilford Road and Carmel Drive so cars cannot accidentally end up in the detention pond. The chair back cums should be sufficient in most places but additional safeguards are needed were cars are cbanging direction or the top of bank begin rigllt at the curb line. 9. please provide a detail on the 9' x 9' struCture that will be used to close up all the drain pipes along Guilford Road. The design and final installation of this structure must be approved by HCSQ, as it is part of the regulated drain. 10. Is this block of Carmel Science and Technology Park being re-plated? Ifso, please provide us a copy of the plat for our review. 11. Please include all appropriate MCSO Standard Detail for the Fertig ReconstrUction in the plans. 12. All casting should be labeled "Dump No Waste - Drains to Waterway," which are readily available now from local casting distributorS. Please add a note to the plans that will make the contraetor away of this requirement. 13. Please note that further comments may be necessary at a later date. Should you have any questions, I can be reached at 317-776-8495. ~' Greg Hoyes Plan Reviewer cc: Matt Griffin - Carmel DOCD John South - HCSWCD Dick Hill - Carmel Engineering. Crossroads En,gineering Bingham McHale LLP BD Carmel Drive Development - 808-6770 BINGHAM MCHALE LLP Fax:3172369907 . BINGHAM. McHALE LLP Attorneys at Law Jul 13 2005 12:31 It P.01 2700 Market Tower 10 West Market Street Indianapolis, IN 46204-4900 ~ ..?~C<1~b bocs To: Angie Conn Fax: 571-2426 Phon.~ He: Retum F. ,,= 317-236-9907 User II: 0432 Client #: 0893 D Urlent D For Review From: Mary E. Salada Pages: 2 Date: July 13, 2005 cc: Return Phone #: 317-635-8900 Sec. Initials: Ch1 Matter II! 59871 [J Please Comment 0 Please Reply D Please Recycle CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE THIS MESSAGE IS PRIV A TE AND CONFIDENTIAL AND IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PRIVATE USE OF THE SENDER AND TIlE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHOM IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN CERTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE. If the reader ofrhis message is not the intended recipient or an employee of agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distnbution or copying of this communication is strictly prombited. Any inadvertent receipt by you of such confidential information shall not constitute a waiver of any privilege. If you have received this communication in error, please refrain from reading 01' copying it and notify us immediately by telephone and return the original message to us by mail. Thank you. . Comment8= Per your fax, attached are the Findings of Fact pertaining to the BW Partners Medical Office Building Development Plan. Please email me at chall@bioKhammchale.com should you need anything else. Thanks. . e c ~)' ';;l, . ,."^, d , . ,;t."~:~I' :;J:1":'~ City of Carmel July 11, 2005 VIA FAX: 236-9907 Original by mail Mary Solada Bingham McHale, LLP 2700 Market Tower 1 0 West Market Street Indianapolis, IN 46204-4900 RE: Carmel Science & Technology Park, Blk 11- Medical Office Building (#05060042 DP Amen d/ADL S) Ms. Solada: This letter is in response to your DP Amend/ ADLS Application for Science & Technology Park, Blk 11 - Medical Office Building. Members will make additional comments at the July 20 T AC Meeting. Please complete the following items: ' 1. Refer to and provide the most recent covenants for Camel Research & Development Park. The most current version in the Department's files is dated September 1982. 15-ft side and rear yards are required by the covenants and it specifies the building-to-land ratio. 2. Provide a summary of the project, block development, and ifpart of Block 11 will be subdivided further. If so, this building site will need a minimum 100-ft frontage, per the M-3 district requirements. 3. The maximum lot coverage (buildings and pavement) for this district is 80%; please show/provide the lot coverage of this site plan. Address how this will change if/when the remaining property is developed/subdivided. A variance for lot cover may be needed in the future. 4. Provide drainage calculations. 5. Please add Docket No. 05060042 DP Amend/ADLS to the site plan. 6. Show/label a 50-ft front yard setback (2 times building height). 7. Show/label side & rear yard setbacks as 60-ft (2 times building height). 8. Provide a landscape plan, addressing Chapter 20D.07-Landscape Standards for the M-3 District. 9. Refer to Chart B in the M-3 District requirements for landscaped yard widths; 40-ft front landscaped yard and 15-ft side/rear landscaped yards. 10. Keep plantings out of the legal drain easement. 11. A solid visual buffer or screen is required along the south property line, adjacent to the condominiums. (May include, but not be limited to a minimum five-foot (5') high solid evergreen hedge; stone, brick or wood fence; earth mounding or other suitable material or any combination a minimum of five (5) feet in height. If a chain link fence (with or without screen slats) is used, a minimum of five-foot (5') high solid evergreen hedge shall be provided on the residential or Page 1 ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571-2417 - e commercial side of the fence.) 2. Provide a landscape plan, addressing Chapter 20D.07-Landscape Standards for the M-3 District. 3. Please submit the Findings of Fact sheet that accompanies the Development Plan application, which can be found at http://www.ci.carmel.in.us/services/DOCS/DOCSA.htm. 14. Per M-3 requirements, show one loading dock area or one ground level loading doors area. 15. Provide any fencing details and location. 16. Please show black line elevations with outline of mechanical equipment behind screening wall. 17. Please clarify the dumpster location. 18. Provide pavement & curbing details. 19. Show/label the fire hydrant locations. 20. Signage: only 5 signs, (3 wall signs and 2 tenant directory signs) are allowed. Also, tenant directory ground sign heights must be reduced to 5' and may only have a sign face area of 20 sq .ft. Provide details how each sign will be lit. Provide wall sign details. Variances may be needed for 3 tenant directory ground signs (number of), the height of the ground signs, and for having two wall signs on one building elevation (sign type.) 21. Lighting: provide wall-mounted and pole parking light fixture details. Also, show a 90-degree cutoffwith flat lenses. 22. Bring materiaVcolor samples to the Plan Commission meeting. 23. Show/label the road rights of way for 122nd Street (70-ft half), Carmel Drive (45-ft half), and Guilford (40-ft half). Also, show/label the road centerlines. 24. Please dedicate additional road right of way to meet the right of way, as prescribed by the 20-yr Thoroughfare Plan, for all three road frontages. 25. Typically, 10-ft asphalt paths are required per the Alternative Transportation Plan, but 5-ft sidewalks will be required along all three road frontages, instead. 26. Show/label utility line locations and easements. 27. Label the building dimensions on the site plan. 28. Entry drive on 122nd Street needs an access easement on the other lot (Blk 11, Lot 1). 29. Note: in a past attempt to develop the site, the petitioner agreed to road improvements on Guilford Rd and Carmel Dr, along with donating additional road rights of way and agreeing to install the necessary sidewalks and or/like paths. These commitments will be expected for this project, also. '4, If you have any questions or if I may be of assistance, please feel free to call. Sincerely, An~nn ee~ Planning Administrator File: 05060042-CarmelScience&TechCenter,Blkll CC: Bob Doster, Schneider Corp File Page 2 ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571-2417