Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes TAC 09-19-01 Carmel/Clay Technical Advisory Committee Minutes September 19, 2001 9:00 a.m. Members present: Jon Dobosiewicz - Carmel DOCS Mike McBride – Carmel Eng. Steve Cash - Ham. Co. Surveyor John Lester - Carmel Parks Dick Hill - Carmel Eng. Gary Hoyt – Carmel Fire Dept. Bill Akers - Carmel Communications S:TechnicalAdvisoryCommittee\Minutes\tac2001sept 1 Village of WestClay, Section 6501-B (Secondary Plat) st The site is located southeast of West 131 Street and Towne Road. The site is zoned PUD/Planned Unit Development. Filed by Keith Lash of the Schneider Corporation for Brenwick TND Communities, LLC. Keith Lash presented the case and introduced Jose Kreutz, Brenwick Development, and Bill Brosius, William Gordon Group. Section 6501-B is comprised of 6 lots on 1.5 acres at the northeast quadrant of the village center. The infrastructure is installed; the work was done in conjunction with Phase I two years ago. Brenwick now wishes to plat the section. The plat will be submitted for recording with Section 6502 that is now under construction. It is located just east of Section 6501. The County Highway Department wants an easement added and a fee submitted. The easement is next to the alley. The alley should also be defined as an easement. Bill Akers sent an address list to the petitioner. Steve Cash stated this is similar to previous sections. The plan is okay. Clay Township Regional Waste District has received the plat and has no comments at this time since construction plans would still need to be reviewed by the District’s consulting engineers. Once that review is complete, the plans will be ready to be submitted by the District to IDEM for State approval. S:TechnicalAdvisoryCommittee\Minutes\tac2001sept 2 Village of WestClay, Section DP01-B (Secondary Plat) st The site is located southeast of West 131 Street and Towne Road. The site is zoned PUD/Planned Unit Development. Filed by Keith Lash of the Schneider Corporation for Brenwick TND Communities, LLC. Keith Lash, Jose Kreutz, and Bill Brosius also presented this secondary plat. (See above case). Section DP01-B is located in the southwest quadrant of the village center. There are 30 lots on 2.68 acres. The area surrounding it was previously developed. Brenwick did not know what the market desired in duplex housing before this time. There are 30 duplex lots that primarily alley load. The “greens” are the emphasis of the development. Brenwick realized they met ordinance requirements for lot width and depth, but not for square footage. The plat has been modified to now meet the minimum square footage requirements also. The fire department has requested some type of roadway system that will support the weight of a fire engine to access from lot 4 to lot 5. Brenwick agrees that connection can be made between the two, perhaps with a brick paver. It would be for emergency vehicular traffic only and not for regular traffic. The front of the units are typically four feet above the alleys. The middle level of these three-story units appears to be the first level from the front of the duplex. The garage is lower because of the streetscape. The storm sewer, sanitaries, and mains are installed throughout the section. Brenwick is working with the utilities. The full construction plans are not filed. Mr. Lash wanted TAC input first. The construction plans will be sent to TAC members in one week. Steve Broermann, County Highway Department, will be contacted regarding his comments. Jon Dobosiewicz stated monumentation on sheet two of the secondary plat should be added. The emergency access easement must be noted within Commons Block B on the plat. Keith Lash asked if it could be labeled “DU&SE”. He is not certain how that block needs to be described from a platting and covenants standpoint. Mr. Dobosiewicz responded that it should be contained in the legend also. Mr. Lash agreed. The minimum square footage and lot depth ordinance requirements have been accomplished with the revision. Lot 1 might be 73’ on one side and 91’ on the other side. Jon Dobosiewicz will look more closely at that. The ordinance requires the build to line to be 15’ or “as otherwise specified” on the plat. That build to falls between 0’ and 20’ because the front yard is 0’ to a maximum of 20’. It is in excess of 50’ on lots 3, 4, 5, and 6. Mr. Dobosiewicz asked if these areas could be part of Block B. This makes a difference on all of the lots with greens and alleys between the lots. The City has not contemplated duplexes that do not front on a street. Bill Brosius stated a van could load into the garage. A large semi trailer would be unable to do so. Mr. Dobosiewicz requested that the rear yard line be identified on the plat. Keith Lash might include a statement. He does not know exactly where the garage will be. Mr. Dobosiewicz understands this will be a common area. It will not be easements crossing individual properties. The petitioner must show their plan meets the ordinance requirement. Jose Kreutz stated the original plan showed a closed area. Mr. Dobosiewicz has no problem with the intent of the product. Bill Akers suggested a meeting with Gary Hoyt to consider addressing of S:TechnicalAdvisoryCommittee\Minutes\tac2001sept 3 the duplexes. Mr. Brosius displayed a drawing of the project. Finished home prices will be $210,000 to $250,000. A retaining wall system to accommodate handicap requirements is no longer needed. A natural ramp is utilized. The areas around are higher than the alley. A fire truck can drive through there. Mr. Akers has not found an addressing solution. Mr. Lash stated the porch overhangs the build to line. Jon Dobosiewicz said this may bring them closer to the 20 feet. Jose Kreutz stated fire trucks can get into the alley. Bill Brosius asked if the “thru issue” is a concern. Brenwick prefers the green concept. Bill Akers anticipates some problems with addresses. He might need to use an “a” and “b” system for the duplexes. Mr. Dobosiewicz requested a special meeting. Jose Kreutz inquired whether they are conceptual problems. Mr. Dobosiewicz is working through the ordinance. Steve Cash will handle the section in the same way as the Ryland Block. The easements look fine. He needs a full set with details. Bill Brosius responded the turn into the alleys would not be curved. Mr. Dobosiewicz cautioned that the radius on the turns not be too tight. Jose Kreutz believes the edge of the driveway should be curved. S:TechnicalAdvisoryCommittee\Minutes\tac2001sept 4 Valleybrook Subdivision, Section 2, Lots 66 & 67 (Replat) The site is located at the south end of Deer Ridge Place in the Valleybrook Subdivision. The site is zoned S-1/Residence – Low Density. Filed by Dave Barns of Weihe Engineers, Inc. for W. Steele Gudal. The replat for the two-lot subdivision was presented by David Barns. There are two individuals who will purchase the two lots. They wish to change the lot line. The location of the homes will place them facing a different direction. The owners want their homes to have basement walk outs. No additional utility construction is necessary. The buyers want an access easement off lot 67. They are partners in their own business. The change will orient their lots to work with the topography. The prospective owners are aware of the flood plain on the land; they will work with and stay above the 100-year flood elevation. Dick Hill has not had an opportunity to look at this replat closely. The access easement is for just one driveway. Mr. Barnes thinks it will be 18 feet wide. The easement is 30 feet. Mike McBride believes all the drainage and utility easements will be maintained. Steve Cash stated the Mitchner Drain affects this property. On lot 66, the 100-year flood elevation is 791. The house pad for that lot is two feet below. Mr. Cash wants this taken into consideration. The County has a flood plain ordinance for regulated drains that prohibits filling in the flood plain. However, they might allow fill in with compensated storage. It is important to make the clients aware of this. When the 100-year flood passes through, the County does not want people to complain of carpets, etc. ruined in their walk out basements. Dave Barns told one of the owners this. Lot 66 will probably be more L shaped. The south half will be a walk out. The buyers are aware of flood plain and 100 year flood level. Weihe Engineers will share this information with whoever prepares the plot plan. This is the only hazard Steve Cash sees. It can be done well; but the house should be designed appropriately. The bottom elevation should be at about 793. Bill Akers thinks the lots already have addresses. If not, he will assign addresses. Jon Dobosiewicz stated the lots are within city limits. He wants to make certain Steve Cash’s comments are fully known. These safe guards must be known when the building permits are issued. Steve Cash suggested a statement of minimum basement elevation on the plot plan. Dave Barnes said the proposed plat gives the 100-year elevation. Steve Cash wants the minimum floor elevation added. The finish floor elevation should be on the plot plan used to obtain the building permit. Jon Dobosiewicz wants a note added to the plat stating the 100-year flood frequency level is 791.0 and the finish floor elevation must be 2 feet above this. The leg off the cul de sac should be more radial to make the distinction between the two lots clearer. The Ordinance speaks to that. The primary and secondary docket numbers should be added to the plat. The lots should be labeled 66a and 67a of Valleybrook. These are amended lots. Mike Hollibaugh’s name should be included under signatory for the department. Where indicated “prepared for” it should be S:TechnicalAdvisoryCommittee\Minutes\tac2001sept 5 rd changed to “owner/subdivider”. The submission date is August 23. The plat will be recorded with two individual signatures as they exist today. S:TechnicalAdvisoryCommittee\Minutes\tac2001sept 6 CH Land ADLS (Development Plan) st The site is located northwest of West 131 Street and North Meridian Street. The site is zoned B5/Business on 1.87± acres. Filed by E. Davis Coots of Coots Henke & Wheeler for CH Land LLC. CraigKaiser, CH Land LLC, Bob Lunsford, R.D.J. Custom Homes, and Matt Oman, The Schneider Corporation, provided information regarding the proposed dental office at st 131 and Meridian. CH Land will develop a one-story dental office on the .8 acre parcel. The petitioner is working in conjunction with the property to the east. They are following the 31 Overlay Zone requirements. Dick Hill did not write comments but will send a formal letter. Many of his comments are generated by the fact that drawings refer to the eastern parcel that is not developed. This project is within Carmel’s corporate limits. The street and right of way are City of Carmel, water is Indianapolis Water Company, sanitary sewer is Clay Township Regional Waste District, and storm sewer is Hamilton County Surveyor’s Office. Mr. Hill previously gave the petitioner information on the Board of Public Works safety requirements, bonding requirements, and expectations for review drawings. The land will not be platted. Mr. Hill wants dedication documents for 15 additional feet of right of way. Dave Coots needs to coordinate with the Engineering Department for their acceptable form. The petitioner must identify the dimension of the existing right of way lines on both sides of Meridian Corners. The existing half right of way is 45 feet; the new half right of way will be 60 feet on the south side. An asphalt path or sidewalk is needed. The City Engineer will not recommend approval of what appears to be a median cut for temporary construction. Construction grade drawings are needed. Kate Weese did not approve the entrance road or its location/alignment as indicated on the plans. She wants it adjusted so left turns will align for the exit of the subdivision. The road plans need to be on the plan. The entrance road will be private. A right of way pavement section is required. The minimums would be 1.5”, 3”, and 10”. The median should be taken out of Meridian Corners’ right of way. The Engineering Department will not give approval until all the entrance issues are resolved. The Plan Note on Sheet C101 will not be accepted. The entrance road must be built prior to these plans being accepted or be on a set of approved plans for the adjacent site. “Pending” conditions will not be accepted. The petitioner does not have plans at this time for the south portion. Some notation to that affect should be made on the plans. Sheet C102 contains an end section that is floating. Matt Oman does not have all the calcs. There will be a drainage easement going to pond. Dick Hill stated there is a curb inlet in the construction path of the entrance road. Regarding drainage, the similar “by others” note is not acceptable. Mr. Hill referenced #21 of his letter of September 19, 2001. Grading plans for the entire site are needed. The storm sewers/storm drainage is under County Surveyor jurisdiction, but Carmel Engineering still wants the drainage calcs. Matt Oman stated plans for the site to th the east would be submitted to the October 17 TAC. The drainage issues and entrance road will be resolved. Reference to City of Lawrence, Citizens Gas and Coke Utility, and the City of Indianapolis need to be corrected. The responsibility statement on Sheet S:TechnicalAdvisoryCommittee\Minutes\tac2001sept 7 C100 needs to be removed. Mr. Hill stated most of his questions would have been answered if full plans for the entrance road and adjacent lot had been submitted. Jon Dobosiewicz cannot proceed without having answers to the numerous questions. Steve Cash wants to know what the plan is, where drainage is proposed, and when will it nd be available. Matt Oman said plans would be submitted on October 2 for TAC. The drainage report will be ready then too. Steve Cash has no problem reviewing and approving concurrently, but he must see the calcs and detention plan. Craig Kaiser said the two projects would be constructed simultaneously. The earth moving weather is an issue. Assuming there will be another pond that will serve detention for this, then Mr. Cash sees no big problems. He will reserve other comments until he gets calcs and the drainage report. John Lester had no comments. Gary Hoyt sent a letter to Dave Coots requesting a Knox box on the building. Application forms are available from the fire department. The building will not be sprinkled. The basement is 1,610 square feet in size. The basement will be used for records and storage. Mr. Hoyt believes the state fire code requires a sprinkler system for sub terrain areas over 1,500 square feet. He will check this. Bill Akers understands this proposed project is northwest of the Bethlehem Church. Mr. Akers will assign an address. The development across the street should be “Park Meadows” not “Parks of Spring Mill”. Jon Dobosiewicz asked if the petitioner plans to maintain ownership of the entire lot. No one has approached DOCS with discussion of subdividing. Craig Kaiser will speak with Dave Coots. Mr. Dobosiewicz stated the project could be constructed on a single tract. He knows the petitioner is trying to adhere to a timetable; however, certain steps must be followed. The platting procedure will take 90 to 100 days. Drainage information is required prior to Plan Commission approval. If the petitioner sells a separate parcel of real estate and building, they must go through subdivision provision. The petitioner may build now; however, any split will require subdivision. Dick Hill will require the plans for the entrance, drainage, and roads. The setbacks are fine. Carmel cannot issue a Certificate of Occupancy until the other drive is built. Craig Kaiser believes they will construct the driveway and be reimbursed. Matt Oman asked for clarification on the entrance realignment. Dick Hill suggested a meeting with Kate Weese. Jon Dobosiewicz wants to see the temporary and permanent plans. The rezone gave options “a” and “b”. A commitment was made to construct it in that manner because the residents were concerned about cut-through traffic until Illinois Street is constructed. The petitioner must put in a temporary drive and design a permanent drive. Then, when Illinois Street is extended, they will conform. Jon Dobosiewicz suggested closing the entrance nearest to Meridian Corners. Bob Lunsford inquired about the dumpster area. The potential occupant is a dentist. There is very little S:TechnicalAdvisoryCommittee\Minutes\tac2001sept 8 trash generated by the practice. A roll container would be emptied only twice a week. Jon Dobosiewicz suggested designing something on the side of the building to the north along the sidewalk. It needs to match the building. The trash enclosure can be designed to fit the size of the trash container. Bob Lunsford stated he might wish to move the building a short distance. Mr. Dobosiewicz wants to see this project again at the October TAC. The petitioner should make a revised submittal to Engineering and the Surveyor’s office and respond to their comments. Moving the building a little will not be a big concern. The drainage and access issues will be discussed. Matt Oman agreed to meet with the Engineer’s office. S:TechnicalAdvisoryCommittee\Minutes\tac2001sept 9 Docket No. 106-01 OA; College Hills PUD – Ordinance Amendment Petitioner seeks favorable recommendation of a text amendment to a PUD/planned unit th development district on 20.5± acres. The site is located northwest of East 96 Street and North College Avenue. The site is zoned PUD. Filed by Charles D. Frankenberger of Nelson & Frankenberger for Gershman Brown & Associates. Charlie Frankenberger, introduced Blair Carmosino, Larry Longman, Jeff Stone, Jonathan Henricksen, and John Anderson, Duke Construction, Jack Edwards, Home Place (CTRWD), and Alan Tucker, CSO Architects. The subject 20-acre real estate is th the part of College Hills subdivision located south of I 465, north of 96 Street, west of College, and East of the Five Seasons Sport Club. The petitioner previously asked for PUD rezone to permit office use. That request, together with request for plat vacation and annexation, has been granted. Gershman Brown & Associates has decided to request a text amendment to the PUD ordinance to permit enclosed parking plazas. Dick Hill and Mike McBride had no input at this time. They will be involved with construction plans later. The annexation status is in its 60-day waiting period. It will thth become effective October 119 or 20. The right of way was not accomplished. The original annexation petition annexed only the College Hills subdivision and that segment th of 96 Street that is adjacent to it to the centerline. Had the petitioner tried to include other real estate, it would have pushed their timetable back. They stayed with the original legal description that accompanied the notices. Steve Cash had no comments beyond his previous remarks. This private project does not effect the County regulated drain. No permits are required. Jon Lester had no comments on the parking structure. The plans should show a sidewalk th along 96 Street. It will probably tie into the Five Seasons. Gary Hoyt and Bill Akers had no comments. Jon Dobosiewicz understands submittal of the preliminary development plan will be December 1, 2001. It is important to show the Plan Commission where side yards are, proximity to I 465, and correspondence from the State on encroaching farther toward I 465. Mr. Dobosiewicz noted the project was getting a lot closer to East 96 street. Staff does not want a big difference between the conceptual development plan proposed to the Plan Commission and the project submitted for approval in terms of the Ordinance. A th total of 83 feet from the section line is not a very deep set back from 96 Street. It changed from 200 feet. He would like the one entrance in line with the area to the south. Blair Carmosino stated that could be done but Duke will order an evaluation of the traffic impact. The location of the entrance may vary 150 feet because Duke does not want to cross mingle traffic. He anticipates 80 to 90 percent of traffic will be from the west. Mr. Carmosino does not believe a signal is warranted. Splitting traffic into the development will allow left movement out before it mingles. Duke will look at the issue both ways. S:TechnicalAdvisoryCommittee\Minutes\tac2001sept 10 Jon Dobosiewicz will address the matter at the time a development plan is submitted. Technical issues such as set backs, easements, and buffers need to be adequate. Blair Carmosino inquired about the concern regarding minimum building setback. Mr. Dobosiewicz quoted Exhibit “Z” 3. Charlie Frankenberger said that pertained if they had th plazas closer to 96 Street instead of in the rear. Blair Carmosino added many versions have been considered. Duke may be able to strike the 83 feet and keep at the 200 feet at Plan Commission time. The matter will be evaluated before Plan Commission. Jon Dobosiewicz will scheduled this project again for the November TAC agenda for review of the preliminary development under the Ordinance conceptual plan. A final development plan (construction drawings) will then be submitted. Blair Carmosino said Duke will hold a meeting tomorrow at 10:00 a.m. regarding demolition. They are progressing through the closings with hopes of Duke ownership by November 10, 2001. Occupants will be out by January 31, 2002. The petitioner’s environmental consultant and survey consultant will locate wells and septic systems. Mr. Carmosino invited all TAC members with an interest to attend tomorrow’s meeting. They will also deal with utility disconnects. S:TechnicalAdvisoryCommittee\Minutes\tac2001sept 11 Hilton Garden Inn (Revised Development Plan) st The site is located at the southeast corner of U.S. 31 and West Main Street (East 131 Street). The site is zoned B-2/Business within the US 31/Meridian Street Overlay Zone. Filed by James J. Nelson of Nelson & Frankenberger for Meridian Hotel Partners, LLC. Attorney Jim Nelson introduced Matt Oman, The Schneider Corporation, and explained the plans for Meridian Hotel Partners. The project was previously submitted for TAC review. At last night’s Plan Commission meeting, there was a public hearing on the Development Plan and ADLS application. The five-acre parcel is located within the st Meridian Corridor at 131 Street and US 31. The revised plans address prior issues discussed at TAC. Hilton Garden Inn requests final review of the corrected plans. Mike McBride has not completed a full review. Kate Weese will write a letter. The existing right of way shown for the future ramp from US 31, as it approaches Pennsylvania, is outside of the right of way shown for that resolution. Kate Weese is trying to coordinate this with the planning for the ramp and roundabout shown for the st intersection of Pennsylvania and 131 Street. Mr. Nelson inquired if that was because Pennsylvania and the roundabout are planned to be moved eastward. Mr. McBride does not think the roadway will be moved. The right of way was based on the section line but the road has deviated from it. Mike McBride stated this is not a big issue because no major development is proposed in that corner where the roundabout is located. However, the City does not want to indicate right of way vacation. It is assumed the existing right of way will stay in its current location; the City will not get less right of way. Jim Nelson stated the petitioner has committed to divide the future right of way into two parts-- regional improvement and local. By way of commitment, the petitioner has agreed to st reserve the area for the ramp. It will also dedicate the right of way of 131 Street and Pennsylvania to create a west one-half right of way on Pennsylvania of 45 feet and 60 st feet on 131 Street. Hilton Garden Inn will dedicate those rights of way. Schneider Engineering will prepare the legal descriptions. The thoroughfare plan requires it. Mike McBride asked if the 45-foot right of way dedicated on the west side of Pennsylvania is measured from the center line. Engineering wants to be certain the right of way is sufficient to include the width of a multipurpose path. The plan shows the existing walk outside of the right of way. Jim Nelson responded the commitment is to extend the sidewalk southward to run the full north and south dimension of the property. He assumes it is measured from the existing center of the road. Engineering concurs. Ultimately the new walk and existing walk will be within the right of way. Jim Nelson said if the 45 half right of way is measured from the centerline, the walks should be within. Mr. Nelson will proceed as if it is from the center. Jon Dobosiewicz clarified the existing right of way at this location on Pennsylvania is 55 feet wide. It jogs back. When Pennsylvania was constructed, the right of way came from one side of the section line. Mr. Dobosiewicz inquired if they call 55 feet the center and 27.5 feet the half, would another 20 feet be needed. Mike McBride said no. Engineering does not need a minimum of right of way amount, they just want to see that the path is included in the right of way. S:TechnicalAdvisoryCommittee\Minutes\tac2001sept 12 Mike McBride had questions on the impact of the detention area and the proposed ramp through and adjacent to the area. Kate Weese will ask for some description. Matt Oman believes the drainage calcs have been submitted to Engineering. If the ramp is at grade or st elevated significantly, it will impact their detention. The plan provides for 131 Street to ththst go under the expressway. The City of Carmel would prefer to have 116, 126, and 131 Street go over the expressway. Carmel wants the township to remain connected to the City. US 31 should not become a dividing line. Regarding the note indicating the st location of a future roundabout at the intersection of Pennsylvania Street and 131 Street, either some conceptual sketch will be placed on the plan or the note will be removed. Mr. McBride said the note could be taken off the plans as long as right-of-way is being shown. Jim Nelson stated there is sufficient distance between the location of the entrance and the roundabout. Mike McBride agreed. There is a total of 250 feet from the centerline of 131st Street to the centerline of the entrance drive on Pennsylvania. He will discuss the matter further with Kate Weese. Steve Cash stated an outlet request permit is required for the J.R. Collins watershed drain. He also needs a copy of the drainage report. Gary Hoyt inquired whether the fire department connection would be free standing in the yard or on the building. The fire department would prefer it not be on the building because the distance between the hook-up and the hydrant is greater than 50 feet. The Knox box at the front entrance can be recessed or flush mounted. Bill Akers will assign addresses later. Addresses should be on the building and/or on the sign in front. Jon Dobosiewicz stated this matter was before the Plan Commission last night. Because of changes it will be sent to the Special Studies Committee. The proximity of the st entrance to 131 Street and the proposed roundabout will be discussed. A meeting will be scheduled to prepare a document for the right of way and dedication to the City. S:TechnicalAdvisoryCommittee\Minutes\tac2001sept 13 Northview Christian Life (Special Use Amendment) Petitioner seeks Special Use Amendment approval in order to establish three (3) 1056- st square-foot modular buildings. The site is located at 5535 East 131 Street. The site is zoned S-1/Residence – Low Density. Filed by James J. Nelson of Nelson & Frankenberger for Northview Christian Life Church, Inc. Jim Nelson presented the amendment and introduced Aaron Reynolds, Civil & Environmental Construction, as a representative of the church. Northview Christian Life submitted the plans for a temporary addition to the education wing of the church. It consists of three modular units each 24’ x 44’ in size. They will be used for a period not to exceed three years for expansion of the religious education facility. Mr. Nelson received six specific questions that he will address within the next day. This project is a temporary expansion. The church plans to return within the next year with a special use amendment of plans for the permanent education expansion. The modular units are common to this area and have been used by the Carmel Clay School System. Dick Hill has not thoroughly reviewed the project. No water or sewer will be used. Mr. Hill will look at the plans and write a letter if he has comments. Steve Cash asked if the storm pipe is extended to its maximum length. Aaron Reynolds responded it does not have positive drainage; the water is from a storm sewer inlet. The swale has been blocked off but will be opened to provide a path for drainage. Mr. Cash stated the church is within the watershed of the Mitchner county drain. He will not require extra detention at this point. However, when permanent building plans are reviewed, the relation to the outlet into the water shed will be considered. Gary Hoyt sent a letter to Jim Nelson. He asked if the educational modular units have internal pulsations for fire. Mr. Reynolds said the future expansion will be to the south. That will allow full utilization of the temporary units during construction. A connection between the buildings on their alarm will be required only if they have pulsations. Aaron Reynolds will check this. Bill Akers had no comment. Jon Dobosiewicz had no comments about the proposal. Jim Nelson should be prepared to speak to the BZA about Mr. Lillig’s comments. In regard to future expansion of the building, the existing parking lot is not curbed. Mr. Dobosiewicz does not know if that is pursuant to a previously approved variance. However, the new parking regulations come into effect. Jim Nelson will research the matter. The meeting adjourned at 11: 41 a.m. S:TechnicalAdvisoryCommittee\Minutes\tac2001sept 14