The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLevel of Service Analysis Usta1.ruo 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS ************************************************************* *** FACILITY LOCATION.... 96TH STREET ANALyST.............. SF TIME OF ANALySIS..... AM PEAK DATE OF ANALySIS..... 05-01-2001 OTHER INFORMATION.... 96TH ST CORRIDOR STUDY TRAFFIC VOLUM ES A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS --------------------------------~------------------------- PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS..... ................... PERCENTAGE OF BUSES......................... PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... DESIGN SPEED (MPH). ...... ..... .............. PEAK H 0 U R FA C TOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · · · · · · · · · · · · · DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN) .......... LANE WI DTH ( FT) . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . · · · · · · · · · · · · · · USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.) ... PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES.................... 1 o o 50 1 25 / 75 12 4 100 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ---------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL TERRAIN E E E f f f LOS T B R w d HV ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- A 2 1.8 2.2 .92 .86 .99 B 2.2 2 2.5 .92 .86 .99 C 2.2 2 2.5 . 92 .86 .99 D 2 1.6 1.6 . 92 .86 .99 E 2 1.6 1.6 .97 .86 .99 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS Page 1 I ~- 0 ..."1 r :.J Usta1.ruo ---------------------------------------------------------- INPUT VOLUME (vph) : 942 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 942 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C --------- ----- A 88 .04 B 350 .16 C 701 .32 D 1250 .57 E 2313 1 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: D 0 Page 2 /;bp e Usta2.ruo 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS ************************************************************* *** FACILITY LOCATION.... 96TH STREET AN AL Y ST. . . . . . . . . . . . .. S F TIME OF ANALySIS..... PM PEAK DATE OF ANALySIS..... 05-01-2001 OTHER INFORMATION.... 96TH ST CORRIDOR STUDY TRAFFIC VOLUM ES A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ---------------------------------------------------------- PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS........................ PERCENTAGE OF BUSES......................... PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... DESIGN SPEED (MPH). ........ ... .............. PEAK HOUR FACTOR............................ DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN) .......... LAN E WI DT H ( FT) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · · · . . · · · · · · · USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.) ... PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES.................... 1 o o 50 1 55 / 45 12 4 100 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ---------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL TERRAIN E E E f f f LOS T B R w d HV ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- A 2 1.8 2.2 .92 .97 .99 B 2.2 2 2.5 .92 .97 .99 C 2.2 2 2.5 . 92 .97 .99 D 2 1.6 1.6 . 92 .97 .99 E 2 1.6 1.6 .97 .97 .99 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS Page 1 :s or 9 Usta2.ruo -~-------------------------------------------------------- INPUT VOLUME (vph) : 1195 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 1195 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C --------- ----- A 99 .04 B 395 .16 C 790 .32 D 1410 .57 E 2608 1 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: D 0 Page 2 L/"O~ 8 Usta3.ruo 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS ************************************************************* *** FACILITY LOCATION.... 96TH STREET AN AL Y ST. . . . . . . . . . . . .. S F TIME OF ANALySIS..... AM PEAK DATE OF ANALySIS..... 05-01-2001 OTHER INFORMATION.... 96TH STREET CORRIDOR STUDY W/USTA A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS........................ PERCENTAGE OF BUSES......................... PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... DESIGN SPEED (MPH) ....... .......... ..... .... PEAK HOUR FACTOR............................ DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN) .......... LAN E WI DT H ( FT) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.) ... PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES.................... 1 o o 50 1 26 / 74 12 4 100 B) CORRECTION FACTORS LEVEL TERRAIN E E E f f f LOS T B R w d HV ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- A 2 1.8 2.2 .92 .87 .99 B 2.2 2 2.5 .92 .87 .99 C 2.2 2 2.5 . 92 .87 .99 D 2 1.6 1.6 .92 .87 .99 E 2 1.6 1.6 .97 .87 .99 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ---------------------------------------------------------- Page 1 Usta3.ruo INPUT VOLUME (vph) : 1002 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 1002 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C --------- ----- A 88 .04 B 353 .16 C 705 .32 D 1259 .57 E 2329 1 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: D 0 Page 2 / .t; c {,-, .1"'\. U Usta4.ruo 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS ************************************************************* *** FACILITY LOCATION.... 96TH STREET AN AL Y ST. . . . . . . . . . . . .. S F TIME OF ANALySIS..... PM PEAK DATE OF ANALySIS..... 05-01-2001 OTHER INFORMATION.... 96TH STREET CORRIDOR STUDY W/USTA A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS.................... .... PERCENTAGE OF BUSES......................... PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... DESIGN SPEED (MPH) ...................... .... PEAK H OUR FA C TOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . · · . · DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN) .......... LANE WI DTH ( FT) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · · · . · . USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.) ... PERCENT NO PASS ING ZONES.................... 1 o o 50 1 54 / 46 12 4 100 B) CORRECTION FACTORS LEVEL TERRAIN E E E f f f LOS T B R w d HV ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- A 2 1.8 2.2 . 92 .98 .99 B 2.2 2 2.5 .92 .98 .99 C 2.2 2 2.5 .92 .98 .99 D 2 1.6 1.6 .92 .98 .99 E 2 1.6 1.6 . 97 .98 .99 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS Page 1 "7 _t;-{} Usta4.ruo INPUT VOLUME (vph) : 1356 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 1356 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C --------- -.....--- A 100 .04 B 397 .16 C 795 .32 D 1419 .57 E 2625 1 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: D 0 Page 2 9 r...C v.