HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence: TAC , n
i 2
6: • (a) Is the property zoned for the intended use?
• X Yes No
(b) If yes , what is the zoning class?
B-5•
•
7 . Project Description: office building containing
approximately. 115,000 renta e sq. t.
•
8. . Construction Schedule:
Start Construction August 1988 ••
Complete Construction Sumner 1989
9 . The Clay Township Regional Waste District Appli-
•
cation Fee made payable to the District is hereby
submitted is the amount of $ 499.38 • as required
by or in ce
•
'Owner a e
• '
There is sufficient sewer capacity and Wastewater Treat-
ment Plant Capacity for the proposed development and a Condi-
• tional Permit to connect to the Clay Township Regional Waste
District (Primary) (Merdian Corridor) Project is hereby issue
with the following conditions as marked :
A. • . 1/ Conditions and Limitations Recommended by the
District for issuance of a Final Construction
Permit from the Indiana Department of
Environmental Management. (See Supplemental
,_ Information Sheet) .
B. - /// Applicant' s Development Project be approved by
the Carmel Plan Commission and/or such other
Board's , Agencies or Governmental Units having
Regulatory jurisdiction over said Project.
C. V That connection of the Development Project to
_� the sewerage system will require a Sewer Service
Agreement between the Project Owner and the
District relating to the Construction and
installation of Public Sewers.
D. � That the Project owner pay all availability
charges and other fees imposed by the District
in connection with the Project which may include
costs incurred by the District for Engineering ,
Accounting and/or Legal services.
1 •
•
E. That the Applicant pursue the approvals and per-
mits necessary to allow the project owner to
proceed with construction of the project.
•
F. Other Conditions (See Attached)
Construction on any phase of the Project shall not
commence until all conditions of the Conditional Permit
are met and the District has issued a Final Permit.
•
Issued this 9 day of atfadi , 198r
CLAY TOWNSHIP REGI. "AL WASTE DISTRICT
Marvin ike Y
•
Utility Manager
1
7 •
j
.
•
•
•
•
L•
^ _. ry ge� �gV EY OR'S o p,( �,;, �-� g
t lifii nc ``�,�3 j' :' f'Gam'L ] _1 -lG v -,.1�`..s;Ill ! ail ��_�- _;� '-�% =
j.",f/: 'pp,,.;.' `-,-.1 • i -LW rr,-:n'?.. ("r 5', 1:-.1 .-I I, i L II t 1 . 1'',' ' 11 - Jul .-it, ( ) ,, --
.,,...21,1„:..7. _1'44:_:,.. , ,i ,• as. p.„: :_. ,.. li_ f , , _ 1 7, .--, : :-Ci___ .--j--
..z.,-,_-_,..-.,. --.4:,:, -- ------v-liJi Q),IA-Ai xl. s ' -"' -----:,, ' - '""-7_ '- l't;'::','‘44-e,ri''''.(9 ,___,-- --''''''-- ``‘x a [lgS, IJI �� �� �c�_.<<� � �, �/ t (cam'
v^ � t} x7 , ,1 .L`. cxenton C \J
�:�}.� atc c�utveyot
776-9626 Tobfesvil1e, (5nel 46060 June 27, 198 8
TO: Paul I. Cripe, Inc.
7172 Graham Road
Indianapolis, In 46250
RE: Two Merididan Plaza-Preliminary Site Plan
I have reviewed the above plans and have the following comments:
1. Break drainage at North property line and pick up as much of that drainage
and take it to the Knotts
2. Need copy of Boundary Survey
3. Need drainage calcs
4. Has drainage in Phase II been changed over to Knotts and temporary outlet
to U.S. 31 Right of Way been removed. Need letter from Engineer stating this.
5. Need to add free board to both ponds. High water elevation mark 845.0 is higher
than top of casting in parking lot, 843.27. Water will be backed up and flood
parking area.
6. Has R/W for Penn been dedicated?
7. Show 846 contour around proposed laek (refecting pond) .
If questions, call 776-9626.
Sincerely
/A 'C
(.7-ri L. Liston
JLL/no Ingi eering Technician
cc; Carmel
Hufford
SCS
City of arms
Wesley G. Bucher
DIRECTOR•DEFT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Dorothy].Hancock Ore(Pt
MAYOR
April 13, 1990 / b Di(E--Zit),
Hamilton County Board of Commissioners
Jeff Davis, President, Carmel/Clay Plan Commission
We have been trying to work out a solution to a situation on Pennsylvania Steet
as part of the Eaton & Lauth office building development. Several of us at the city
and county level have discussed this situation and what needs to be done to resolve
the matter. The following information is a brief explanation of the situation as we
presently understand it.
Situation: A ditch along the east side of Pennsylvania was approved by the C/C
Plan Commission as part of this project. That ditch was not installed. A complaint
by a neighbor prompted us to review the situation and make the following
determination:
1) E & L is willing to construct the ditch that they had approved on plans
and are only waiting for someone to tell them to do it. In fact, they have
already paid the contractor.
2) The ditch that was approved is NOT shown to be a 10' ditch all along
the road. In fact, it shows the neighbors property line projects about 6'
into the ditch area at one point.
3) The survey of the road indicates it was constructed pursuant to plans as
approved and does NOT encroach onto anyone's property as was alleged
by an adjoining property owner.
4) If Eaton & Lauth are requested to put in a 10' ditch (again — not what
was shown on the approved plans), at the request of one neighbor, the
ditch would destroy many trees in the back yards of other neighbors.
•
40 EAST MAIN STREET CARMEL,INDIANA 46032 317/844-6433
I "
page 2
Since the Board of Commissioners has the ultimate authority to accept or reject
this road, we wanted to bring this issue back to your attention and request that you
direct the appropriate County department to make a recommendation to you concerning
what is agreeable and workable to resolve this situation.
Sincerely,
Wesley G. Bucher