HomeMy WebLinkAboutDept Report 04-28-14 CARMEL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
DEPARTMENT REPORT
APRIL 28,2014
I. Old Business
1-8. (UV,V)KG Main LLC, Old Meridian and West Main.
The petitioner seeks the following development standards variance approvals:
Docket No. 13120027 V ZO CH: 20G.05.04.B(1)(B)—Max Bldg Height of 55 ft; 89 ft requested
Docket No. 13120030 V ZO CH 20G.05.04.D(2)(D)—Multi Family Uses Must Conform to All
Architectural Requirements Listed in the Multi-Family Zone(ZO CH
20G.05.02.D)
Docket No. 13120031 V ZO CH 20G.05.02.D(2)- Vertical Offsets Required at Intervals of 50 ft
for Bldgs with Continuous Facades of 60 ft or Greater Width; Intervals
of greater than 50 ft and Architectural Detailing on Facades as per
Submitted Elevations requested
Docket No. 13120032 V ZO CH 20G.05.02.D(3)—All Sides of any Bldg Shall be Brick, and
Trimmed in Brick,Wood, Stone or Precast Concrete; Fiber Cement
Siding/Paneling requested.
Docket No. 13120034 V ZO CH 2.09- Compliance with the Transportation Plan; Petitioner
Wants to Deviate from the Proposed Street System Lay Out.
Docket No. 13120035 V ZO CH 20G.04.03.A—Sidewalk along Main Street Required; Petitioner
States that the City or the CRC will Install it.
Docket No. 13120037 V ZO CH 20G.05.01.F(1)(B)—45 ft Max Bldg Height; 89 ft requested
Docket No. 13120041 V ZO CH 20G.05.01.H(2)(A)—For any Bldg Facing A Street,Fiber Cement
Siding/Paneling in Addition to Brick and Stone requested
The site is zoned OM/SFA(Old Meridian District, Single Family Attached) &OM/MU(Old Meridian
District,Mixed Use.) It is located at 12960 Old Meridian St., at Main St. Filed by Paul Reis of Krieg
Devault, LLP on behalf of Keystone Realty Group, LLC.
y _ _ General Info:
- The Petitioner requests approval of the
.ip
• ' remaining 8 development standards
4, \ variances to permit a 5 story apartment
building with some retail on the 1st floor in
1"°,411r 6 ` the Old Meridian District. This property is
located at the southwest corner of Old
Meridian St.and Main St. This project was
heard at the BZA meeting in January of this
year and some of the variances were
: - approved,including the use variance to
permit apartments. Several of the variances
if were tabled as the project had not been
, reviewed or approved by the Plan
. Commission for the site design and
Mom
architecture yet. Since that time,the project
has received approval from the Plan
Commission and has made some minor
changes to improve the overall design of the project. Please refer to the petitioner's information packet for more
details.
Analysis:
This project is unique in that it straddles 2 different zoning districts. It is within the Old Meridian Mixed Use District as
well as in the Old Meridian Single Family Attached District. That is one reason there are so many variances requested for
this project. The Mixed-Use District permits apartments,however,the Single Family Attached District does not and
8
several of the development standards in the Single-Family Attached District address building design specifically for
townhomes and not for apartments.
Docket No. 13120027 V: Max Building Height 55ft,89 ft requested
Increasing the building height for this project should not have a negative effect on the surrounding area as most of it is
proposed to be or is currently development of a commercial nature. One of the main reasons for an increased building
height is because there is a significant grade change from one end of the project to the other. The east end of the project
measures to 89 feet tall from grade, while the west end measures to 77 feet tall. This measurement is to the highest point
of the building which is increased due to designing the roof as key focal points at the ends of the building. The main
cornice line of the building is below the 77 feet of the west end. The Department is in support of the increased height.
Docket No. 13120037 V: 45 ft.Max Bldg Height; 89 ft. requested
This variance is from the development standards for building single-family attached housing. Since the developer is
proposing multi-family housing,these standards would not be able to be met because the physical form for multi-family
housing is very different from single-family attached. The Department is in support of this variance as it would allow for
the development of this mixed-use project with multi-family housing and should not have a negative effect on the
surrounding area.
Docket No. 13120030 & 13120031 V:Architectural Requirements,Vertical Offsets
The petitioner has agreed to vertical offsets at least every 70 feet. The Department is comfortable with this as this will be
an attractive building and it is meeting the intent of the Old Meridian District. The architecture has also improved as a
part of the Plan Commission review and approval.
Docket No. 13120032 V&Docket No. 13120041 V: Fiber Cement Siding/Paneling requested.
Since this project was originally heard by the BZA, changes have been made to the architecture. More brick has been
added in some areas and the Department is now in support of this variance. The Department would like the petitioner
to calculate the percentage of Fiber Cement Siding/Paneling currently proposed.
Docket No. 13120034 & 13120035 V:Deviation from the Transportation Plan and Sidewalks required
The petitioner is requesting to dedicate less than the required 70 feet of right-of-way,not install sidewalks along Main
Street,and it does not show a street connection north to south as shown on the Thoroughfare Plan. Instead,the Petitioner
has agreed to dedicate 60 feet of right-of-way and is working with the City on an agreement about the required
improvements to Main Street. The Department is comfortable with the reduced right-of-way as there will still be enough
room to construct the new streetscape. The Department is also supportive of not requiring the sidewalks be built at this
time because they would most likely have to be torn up in the future when Main Street is improved. With regard to the
north/south street,the Department would like a connection to the property to the south. The property to the south is
proposed to be developed as apartments as well and connectivity between the parking lots should be provided. This will
help with traffic flow around this area and provide more coordinated development so that these individual projects will
work together to further the establishment of an attractive and relatively dense mixed-use neighborhood; not just isolated,
individual developments. The petitioner has agreed to connect to the property to the south and the Department is in
support of this variance.
Petitioner's Findings of Fact:
Please see the petitioner's information packet for the Findings of Fact.
Recommendation: After all questions and concerns have been addressed,the Dept. of Community Services
recommends favorable consideration of Docket Nos. 13120027, 13120030-32, 13120034-35, 13120037,and
13120041 V.
9