HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence i ' • •
,sLillig, Laurence M
'1 5 •
From: Lillig, Laurence M
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 9:24 AM
To: Pattyn, Dawn E, Keeling, Adrienne M
Cc: Hollibaugh, Mike P ®C fCfIV ti
Subject: RE. Great news — a 2CCp
®®
Mike,
Some background and an opinion: ®$ 6
When the Burger King came through for ADLS Amendment approval (Docket No 150-00 ADLS Amend), it was made
abundantly clear in meetings with the Department that they were permitted only one sign on site They indicated at that
time that they had no problem removing the roof sign in favor of the ground sign
When we noticed that they had erected their ground sign (some time in September 2001), Dawn noted that their Sign
Permit(Permit No. S-152-00) had expired The permit was issued September 8, 2000, and is only valid for six months,
expiring on March 8, 2001. Should it come to the point of having to issue a Notice of Violation, we will have to address
both the lack of a valid permit and the issue of the number of Identification Signs on site After brief discussion among
Adrienne, Dawn and myself, we decided to honor the permit and only require the property owner to immediately remove
the roof sign
As for the question of allowing him to keep both signs for an indefinite period, I believe that Mr Coffman's attitude
precludes this option If we allow him to essentially bully his way into two signs, then the message eventually gets out that
the tactic will work with the Department. If he had come to us beforehand asking for some consideration, I think we might
have been able to show some flexibility for the duration of the Carmel Drive project, but not now
Laurence
Original Message
From: Pattyn, Dawn E
Sent: Thursday,October 04,2001 4 40 PM
To: Lillig, Laurence M;Keeling,Adrienne M
Cc: Hollibaugh, Mike P
Subject: RE.Great news
Ok- I have spoken twice with J.R. Frieberger w/Dart Corp. (they did the ground sign for Burger King) he had spoken
with Fred Coffman (owner of this Burger King)and he didn't want to commit to a date that the wall sign would be
removed. J R., gave me Mr Coffman's phone number I contacted him and he REALLY DOESN'T want to commit to
when the removal of the wall sign will be. I tried to explain that this is in violation of our sign ordinance - he would not
listen - he went on about how the construction on Carmel Drive has lost him thousands in revenue and how he will not
be re-electing Mayor Brainard I tried to get him back to the sign issue and then he did not wish to talk with me- He
would like a call from Mike Hollibaugh
Just thought I would update everyone-and Mike you can reach Mr Coffman at 290-8033
Original Message
From: Lillig, Laurence M
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1014 AM
To: Keeling, Adrienne M
Cc: Pattyn, Dawn E
Subject: RE. Great news
Wow "Notice of Violation" looks so ominous when it's bolded like that....
Original Message
From: Keeling,Adrienne M
Sent: Monday,October 01,2001 1008 AM
To: Lillig,Laurence M
Cc: Pattyn, Dawn E
Subject: RE.Great news
1
Perhaps Dawn could "remind"them of their duties. If that is unsuccessful, then I will send a notice of
violation
Original Message
From: Lillig, Laurence M
Sent: Monday,October 01,2001 1003 AM
To: Keeling,Adrienne M
Cc: Pattyn, Dawn E
Subject: RE.Great news
They've established their ground sign (Sign Permit No.S-152-00)without having first removed their
roof sign Do you want to write them, or should Dawn contact them first?
Original Message----
From: Keeling,Adrienne M
Sent: Monday,October 01,2001 9:38 AM
To: Lillig, Laurence M
Subject: RE.Great news
What is happening at Burger King?
Original Message
From: Lillig,Laurence M
Sent: Monday,October 01,2001 9•12 AM
To: Keeling,Adrienne M
Subject: RE.Great news
Well, that's good news! I didn't even think to look this morning I chose to come in via
Carmel Drive so I could check out the Burger King
Original Message
From: Keeling,Adrienne M
Sent: Friday,September 28,2001 2:46 PM
To: Lillig, Laurence M
Subject: Great news
After absolute harassment of Shell Station personnel. .the flags, balloons, and other
contraband are gone!
2