The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutD-2193-14 VETOED Carmel Historic Preservation; Johnson Addition conservation District SPONSOR(s): Councilor(s) Schleif, Snyder, Sharp, Seidenstick; ORDINANCE D-2193-14 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF HE CITY OF CARMEL,INDIANA,APPROVING THE DISTRICT BO '\D• ' ES AND BUILDING CLASSIFICATIONS ESTABLISHED BY THE CA' 1 ' . ' ISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION REGARDING THE JOHN I • DDITION CONSERVATION DISTRICT \/\ WHEREAS,in 1966, the national debate on the value of hlst• •c buildings to neighborhoods and local economies began when the Nat'• i • Hist4 c Preservation Act was enacted by Congress, and; WHEREAS, in 1981 the State of Indian 'a sed ' 6-7-11 which acknowledged that historic structures in Indiana be protected in speci s . ensure that historical and architecturally significant resources are prey ed; WHEREAS,the City of Carmel, ndi (""ity"), is a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of In i and t'e City's Common Council ("Council") is authorized by Indiana Code 36-7-11 to ap ro e the provisions of this ordinance; and, WHEREAS, the m. sion o e . el Historic Preservation Commission ("Commission") is to prese e and ' the historic or architecturally worthy buildings, structures, sites,monuments, reetsca.es, squares, and neighborhoods of designated historic districts located within t ity co 'orate limits; and, WHEREAS,the Co an Council adopted Ordinance D-2064-11 which created the Carmel Historic Preservatio ommission("Commission") in accordance with IC 36-7-11 to accomplish that goal, and -: .blished procedures for designating historic districts in the City of Cannel; and WHEREAS in order to fulfill its mission,the Commission commissioned an update to earlier surveys in • der to identify historic buildings, structures, and sites located within the City; and, W REAS, the City of Cannel, Indiana has many historic or architecturally worthy resource ational Register buildings and a National Register district,that are listed in the 2014 Cantle lay Township Historic Building Survey commissioned by the Cannel Historic Pres; ation Commission("Survey"); and This Ordinance was originally prepared by Jon Oberlander, Carmel Assistant City Attorney, on 10/13/14 at 11:59 AM. It may have been subsequently revised. However,no subsequent revision to this Ordinance has been reviewed by Mr.Oberlander for legal sufficiency or otherwise. WHEREAS, in fulfilling its mission,the Commission shall be concerned with those elements of City development, redevelopment, rehabilitation, and preservation that affect visual quality in a designated historic district, and with preventing improper infill or alteration, or demolition within a historic district that is obviously incongruous with that district; and, WHEREAS,the Commission used the results of the Survey to prepare a map ("Map") designating the boundaries of a proposed Johnson Addition Conservation District(the "District"); and, WHEREAS,the Commission identified on the Map all buildings, structures, and sites located within the District, and rated them on a list, classifying them as follows: (1) Outstanding ("0"): Property that has sufficient local, state, or national historic or architectural significance to be listed, or to be eligible for individual listing, in the National Register of Historic Places ("National Register"); (2)Notable("N"): Property that does not merit an"0"rating, but is above average in importance and may be eligible for listing in the National Register; (3) Contributing("C"): Property that is at least 40 years old, does not meet the criteria for an"0"or "N"classification, but is important to the density or continuity of an area's historic fabric and may be listed in the National Register as part of a larger conservation district; or(4)Non- Contributing("NC"): Property that is less than 40 years old,has been altered so as to lose its historic character, or is otherwise incompatible with its historic surroundings, and that is not eligible for listing in the National Register; and, WHEREAS,the Commission held a public hearing on October 2, 2014 for the purpose of allowing discussion and public comment on the proposed District; and WHEREAS, at the October 2, 2014 public hearing,the Commission held that the proposed District has historic and architectural significance that merits the protection of the property as a Conservation District; and WHEREAS,the Commission has now submitted the Map establishing the District to the Council for its approval, as required by Indiana Code; and WHEREAS,the Council's approval of the Map and the establishment of the District are in the public interest. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED by the Common Council of the City of Carmel, Indiana, that: Section 1: The forgoing Recitals are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2: The Map and Architectural Standards setting forth the proposed Johnson Addition Conservation District is hereby approved by the Common Council, and the Johnson Addition Conservation District is hereby established. A copy of the Map of the District is attached to this ordinance and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. A copy of the Architectural Standards for the District is attached to this ordinance and incorporated herein as Exhibit B. This Ordinance was originally prepared by Jon Oberlander, Carmel Assistant City Attorney, on 10/13/14 at 11:59 AM. It may have been subsequently revised. However, no subsequent revision to this Ordinance has been reviewed by Mr.Oberlander for legal sufficiency or otherwise. Section 3: Two copies of the Map of the District and two copies of the Architectural Standards for the District shall be placed on file in the Office of the Clerk-Treasurer for public inspection. Section 4: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and signing by the Mayor and such publication as is required by law. rel PASSED by the Common Council of the City of Carmel, Indiana, this u? day of N6Ie w be r ,2014,by a vote of '+ ayes and _3 nays. COMMON COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF CARMEL OppUS.6 Presiding Officer Kevin D. Rider ci W. Eric Seide ticker, President P empore Carol Schleif Ronald E. Carter Richar L. Sharp i o e s , Sue Finkam nyder ATTEST: 7 / 1, ,/ / Diana L. Cordray, IAMC, Irk-Treasurer 40 Presented by me to the Mayor of the City of Carmel, Indiana this3 day of , 2014, at S P .M. tet_6 r , Diana L. Cordray, IAMC, a rk-Treasurer Approved by me, Mayor of the City of Carmel, Indiana,this day of 2014, at _.M. This Ordinance was originally prepared by Jon Oberlander, Carmel Assistant City Attorney, on 10/13/14 at 11:59 AM. It may have been subsequently revised. However,no subsequent revision to this Ordinance has been reviewed by Mr.Oberlander for legal sufficiency or otherwise. James Brainard, Mayor ATTEST: Diana L. Cordray, IAMC, Clerk-Treasurer This instrument prepared by Jon Oberlander, Assistant City Attorney This Ordinance was originally prepared by Jon Oberlander, Carmel Assistant City Attorney, on 10/13/14 at 11:59 AM. It may have been subsequently revised.However,no subsequent revision to this Ordinance has been reviewed by Mr.Oberlander for legal sufficiency or otherwise. VE''TOEDttby the of the City of Carmel, Indiana this 17 tiday of NO V&A . er 2014,by a vote of 3 ayes and 3 nays. COMMON`COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF CARMEL esiding Officer Kevin D. Rider �o-s Presen+- Q PPOSE . E •, Seidensticker, President Pro Tempore Carol Schleif / f o ? P3FD Rona Carter Richard L. Sharp Al PP°s S 4ornkam / Luci Snyder ATTEST: Diana L. Cordray, IAMC, C erk-Treasurer Presented by me to the Mayor of the City of Carmel, Indiana this 17 day of (� 2014, at B : tS P.M. Ate. U'. O ct c, c -Cr Diana L. Cordray, IAMC, Clerk-Treasurer Vetoed by me, Mayor of the City of Carmel, Indiana, this o�5 da of Y Y day 2014, at I.ct0 A.M. Ja s Brainard, Mayor ATTEST: 0'1E1AG:4' V` CU '7D Y Diana L. Cordray, IAMC, Clerk-Treasurer EXHIBIT A Map of Johnson Addition Conservation District nt L� —1?t 111 "J # car! Hall. ■ ;ii _` u I Knell. iii 1 mug N?'1 .., .. d III .. iN 111 , ...-ii ,, � li �fl �� e , i. ! , I t I OS '1 ! _. . �� . cnr eo s _---_II f II up a,, y 1. nil Dr. __ E, t� • i t ��33 l�r 111 1 r��+' Navel . .111111111 __kkk��°iii !sill is i ,' • 1111111 VIII I .,�- �'' d . X11111111 NMI i — — — 1 t Ogr. 1 2,..0 i L 1 , , Y ,, -- 1--41 \1__IL ;-' ".:-` ._. — -.. Ilia . l � , ji arrn-I Middle ` r �� drool School �...... ✓ _ .."-- - c I-, . Indu_nal_Dr t Johnson Addition Conservation Area Carmel Historic Preservation Commission \,., E ��.a`'�� Printed:Jun 10,2014 S` CryNY.r.rror.00ww. ate. ..srva.waw..sew•w••Nm.warwa,r..wla.ewwara.m.wmaw.a.rna•a `l 600 rw ..iw.o,,.sa Nwa•.Mw,1lnMwaraw.rwar rryrr•rr•yw..r.wwr.r..nr.a..w.awwarw.. I 1 o.•v.•.n:r::"".a."' •...1w Maea r•e werrnaw+xara.�aafrwaarsarmr++�..1.1rm t,17 auw+..•. ,fl,&ai!•'r. eb•••. 111∎11 arw•1.1.eaMMltSOn, M)K .3na•rwe raM6S.0 3 .�• •�+•V[wr•ruawq,ri VA' [+nNYmra•tl•.a.a•w•.YO.•Mm•••MP1w•Mrfiwnm.la..um.i•'M1 M,wWOIde6Wr•Uww.Ywn.tlW �/IVUMM'� This Ordinance was originally prepared by Jon Oberlander, Carmel Assistant City Attorney, on 10/13/14 at 11:59 AM. It may have been subsequently revised. However,no subsequent revision to this Ordinance has been reviewed by Mr.Oberlander for legal sufficiency or otherwise. it -...."iil MI t MIE IIIII IIII mil— N t� � � 1 * o ■ I I. 11 ■ • i • in 1 II 4 1 s I O Iii 1Y1 • .. 1 i # ' % # •■�. # ∎■ • • 014 1--- ■r-. ■.s I►■ii.. ' •• V ■ ■ • ■ r ■ r . • Johnson Addition Conservation District i Carmel Historic Preservation Commission Osxsanang 0 District Boundary ■ Notable - Roads s"' Contributing ■ Non-Coro 5n-t rg • This Ordinance was originally prepared by Jon Oberlander, Carmel Assistant City Attorney, on 10/13/14 at 11:59 AM. It may have been subsequently revised. However,no subsequent revision to this Ordinance has been reviewed by Mr.Oberlander for legal sufficiency or otherwise. j Carmel Historic Preservation Commission 201titSOrti APCICatiOtt eans¢1Cvrtian Vint'cict S't1tC15 { 4., ° x ° ra w 7: 'v A i. fil))• # ' ' '-- - 1;tlik -' 'C1/2. 'fe - 1 t=: x Recommended by the Carmel Historic Preservation Commission October 2, 2014 Carmel, Hamilton County, Indiana Officially adopted t ,qaAnsan -Pdcaticon ?ansawv+ .tion V15t'dct S'tandatch ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CITY OF CARMEL MAYOR James Brainard CITY OF CARMEL COMMON COUNCIL Ron Carter Sue Finkam Kevin Rider Carol Schleif Eric Seidensticker Rick Sharp Luci Snyder THE CARMEL HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Carol Schleif, Chairperson Becky Feigh, Vice-Chairperson Luci Snyder, Treasurer Bill Sanders,Jr. Curtis Butcher Jennifer Hershberger Justin Moffett Nick Davis, Advisory Member Dr. George W. Geib, Advisory Member JOHNSON ADDITION CONSERVATION DISTRICT COMMITTEE Co-Chairman: Chuck Ford & Mary Eckard Design Standards: Chuck Ford & Charlie Demler Analysis & Neighborhood Issues:Jonni Upton Boundary Map &Analysis:Julie Gearing&John Martin History Committee: Susie Kennedy CARMEL HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ADMINISTRATOR Mark Dollase Raina Regan Y r -rabid Ot eant¢nts Introduction I Statement of Significance 2 Boundary Map 7 Building Inventory 8 Terminology 39 Classification of Buildings 40 Preservation Objectives 41 Standards for New Construction 42 Standards for Moving Buildings 52 Standards for Demolition 53 Triennial Review 57 Procedures for Changing the Standards 57 ' f gnttOduCtian The Johnson Addition neighborhood is located in the City of Carmel, Clay Township, Hamilton County, Indiana. Located directly west of Old Town Carmel, the Johnson Addition neighborhood represents one of numerous post-war neighborhoods to be built in Carmel. The neighborhood includes 95 properties and retains a remarkable amount of its original fabric, from the placement of original homes to the streetscape which define its significance. In 2013, residents of Johnson Addition approached the Carmel Historic Preservation Commission seeking designation as a Conservation District. With Johnson Addition's location in proximity to nearby schools and shopping, the residents play an integral role in supporting the growth and economic development of the Arts and Design District. With the rapidly growing population of Carmel, the convenient location of the area of Johnson Addition places its current and future tenants close to the incredible amenities of downtown Carmel. The unique architectural design of these homes adds to the value of Carmel and Clay Township by preserving the City's heritage as one of the first developed suburbs of Indianapolis. To lose this diversity in style and substance would be a great loss to the preservation of the history of Carmel. As set forth in the Carmel Historic Preservation Ordinance, the City of Carmel directs the Historic Preservation Commission to establish Historic and/or Conservation Districts. These districts will guide the harmonious development of the city and help maintain established residential neighborhoods and commercial areas to ensure their distinctiveness. Through the designation of districts, the preservation of historic and architecturally worthy buildings, structures, sites, streetscapes, and neighborhoods will impart a distinct aesthetic quality to the City and serve as visible reminders of its historic heritage. The minimally restrictive designation as a Conservation District will provide a level of protection to the neighborhood to maintain its character and significance as a post-war neighborhood in the City of Carmel. The purpose of these design standards is to guide appropriate design within the Johnson Addition Conservation District. The following standards regulate new construction within the boundaries of the district, if such a circumstance should arrive. They do not regulate modifications or additions to existing structures, but can be used as guiding principles. CREDITS:Architectural descriptions and selections from the Statement of Significance are pulled from the Gray and Pape, City of Carmel/Clay Township Historic Property Survey, Carmel, Clay Township,Hamilton County,Indiana(2014). Thank you to the Carmel Clay Public Library for assistance in finding the Carmel Booster articles. Illustrations by Raina Regan. 1 Statement ot S'i5ni4icance For much of its history, Carmel remained a quiet and sleepy farming village, tucked away in the southwest corner of Hamilton County, Indiana. The townships of Clay and Delaware consisted of a patchwork of farmsteads, most of whose origins dated to the early nineteenth century. Many of the early settlers who comprised the population of early Carmel, consisted of members of the Society of Friends (Quakers) and their Methodist neighbors. Agriculture would remain the predominant theme of the community through the nineteenth century and well into the next. Located twenty miles north of Indianapolis, Carmel and Clay Township would evolve into a commuting suburb of the state capitol. During the post-war years of late 1950's and 1960's the township became a patchwork of ranch style housing developments. The developing concept began replacing the disconnected patchwork of working farms. Carmel and Clay Township made an ideal area for those seeking to escape the congestion of the city. This transformation would continue through the 1970's and 1980's, until much of the township's landscape had shifted from agriculture to suburban development. From surviving farmstead homes to Mid- century modern ranch houses, the architecture of Carmel and Clay Townships provides telling evidence of this long fascinating transformation. Even with the influx of residents from Indianapolis, Clay and Delaware townships would remain predominantly rural through World War 11 and into the 1950's. Early indications of suburban sprawl; however, appeared on the landscape soon after the war. Aerial imagery and census records from the years 1940 to 1970 clearly show the results of the suburban movement as it played out in Carmel and Clay townships. Between 1940 and 1950, the population of Carmel jumped from 771 to 1009, an increase of 30.9 percent. To provide housing for the growing population of Carmel and Clay Township, developers platted residential additions on the surrounding landscape. Farmland gradually gave way to the bulldozer as demand for suburban housing escalated. Most of these developments were concentrated between Route 31 and South Range Line Road/Westfield Boulevard. Typical of mass-produced housing of the post war area, these early additions followed a simple grid plan with streets oriented from north to south and east to west. Housing stock consisted largely of ranch type architecture and some subtle derivation thereof. Almost without exception, the houses sat near the center of their respective lots, giving them an ample front yard and a comfortable buffer between house and street. Providing a sense of space and rural living, these ranch developments symbolized the American dream of the post war era. Sherman D. Wilson and Son was one of a handful of builders during the 1950s and 1960s building boom in Carmel. Sherman worked alongside his wife, Hilda, who served as a realtor for their firm, and his son, Thomas. Touted as "Builders and Developers," Sherman D. Wilson and Son plotted the eastern half of Johnson Addition as early as 1 955 and the western half in 1958. Sherman D. Wilson and Son frequently advertised available lots and homes for sale in the local circular, the Carmel Booster. Advertisements for Johnson Addition appeared often during the 2 late 1950s and align with most of the building activity in the development. In an ad from January 17, 1958, Wilson advertised his Johnson Addition properties: 4.-LFor the Budget Purchaser, only 51,600 down for this new l home in Johnson Addition,Carmel, 1050 sq. feet living arel 3 bedrooms, living room 16x16—family kitchen, 11 car garage, concrete itreet, city water and sewer. 5.-13 acres, 116th and New State Road 37. Possible business. 6.—Lot 75 x 215 Newark Village, Street approved F.H.A WIII sell on contract—$1,250 7.-Lot $j Newark Village, 86 x 232—tress—Lite Drive, $1,500 i , S,--Where Can You Beat This—Will build 3 bedrooms, 1t bath, all Brick, Hardwood floors, 2 car attached garage for 17x800 in Johnson Addition, Carmel, landscaped, yards, 2 frees, concrete street, city water and sewer, street lights. An advertisement for Johnson Addition from April II, 1958 in the Carmel Booster highlighted the "concrete streets, city water and sewers," with models costing $14,500. This same advertisement illustrated an early home in the development, with 4 bedrooms and a I-car garage for $16,475. The pictured home is most likely 475 Emerson Road, which dates from 1957 and has been heavily altered. -* When It Comes To . .. North on State ,; ,. LOCATION PRE , ION Road 431 to M • . `` E3 Stop Light 4 JOHNSON ADDITION West to Sgn fQNSRETL STREETS ,, ti •~ : In Popular, Pleasant CARMEL, INDIANA CITY SEWERS iriECISNN HOMfb Astir *lige-4. 1 „ Iu • Carmel Booster Ad, April I 1 1958 475 Emerson Road, 1957 A large majority of the homes in Johnson Addition date from 1959 and 1960, with the development predominately constructed by 1962. The development consists primarily of small, rectangular plan Ranch houses. Home developers during the 1950s and I 960s challenged to find ways to simplify home plans that met Federal Housing Administration (FHA) financing guidelines. FHA encouraged developers to build an entire neighborhood at once, so builders differentiated houses by rotating the house orientation, employing different roof forms, flipping plans, and using a variety of materials. The custom built homes by Sherman D. Wilson and Son feature similar designs, but may vary in placement of exterior building materials, roof shape, and 3 garages. Wilson advertised charming house names for his standard plans, ranging from the Caroline, Harrison, Bently, Concordia, and Car-Mel. t ' ' 5 r "6kyS . '. � t ". .. ...!,.2.4.,:,,,,4.i a � ' ^gt Lw L.:rt.„,„,..„.„... ,,,,, ,,, i r x x' X33 a i ° 33 w i i THE CAROLINE--$16,500 V THE BENTLY 0 f*410' _l $16,60 11Se� rk q THE CAR-MEL /4 _ ., ,.., Ail 1,,,,, ■ �� :- t,' ( '- �..iii I t.I ,,,, $15,500 '.sirr+4o ' . s7 a 5. The Caroline and Bently appear to be the most popular of the house designs constructed. Examples of the Caroline are found at 602 Emerson Rd, 612 Emerson Rd, 637 Emerson Rd, and 825 Emerson Rd. Each property differs slightly, with the most prominent difference in the color of brick veneer. Examples of the Bently are found at 413 Emerson Rd, 474 Emerson Rd, and 817 Emerson Rd, with design differences ranging from hipped to gabled roofs and brick to wood exterior wall finishes. A small percentage of homes in the subdivision do not follow any of the illustrated house designs. These include a Bi-level at 624 Emerson Rd and two more high- style Modern designs at 142 Lantern Ln and 102 Sherman Dr. 4 After Wilson platted the second section in 1958, he advertised the affordability of a new home and the benefits of Johnson Addition's location. This Carmel Booster advertisement from June 5, 1959 shows how Wilson worked to integrate both their real estate business with their construction of new homes, by offering to assist buyers in disposal of their"too-small home. NNOO.000N„O **OOO 444N••OO NOOO-OO 0 ON OO•OO41 0 O4NNOOONO*/NONNN•N•N•N•• OPTIONAL FEATURES ARE AVAILABLE IF YOU DESIRE. * Fireplaces * Hip Roof * More Square Feet * Diniog Room * Attached Garage in Living Area * Built-in Kitchen * Separate Garage * Crawl Space * Family Room * Basement Foundation YOU'LL LIKE ALL THE � ts s� w ./ OAMEADVANTAGES OFFERED l�, '' BY THE I ; ° 1 > ;a1 f JI234 JOHNSON t ADDITION - ,, V • *# w [- . IN IAf1A 1'O rIC TV W tt o f, 1. N t 'I I t Yr, Loa y ' r� t� Y 1 * O icrete.Streets plotted on , M ' z l t .� s „2 ( MONTHLY PAYMENTS curves for beauty and safety _' '�3 � _ a _ _ rt.. 1 as LOW os S80 * Concrete Approaches and Curbs _.:.,,,: ; 1. --,., 2 ;;' - 7. 1 to • f EMIR ISON Ror.o- -- y, _ ,.. * City Water and Electricity Qualified Buyers * Indianapolis Telephone Service // ' ° ” 1-1'" " w Acceptable for .' FHA Financing * Street Lights e * Sanitary and Storm Sewers You'll finCI a site and a house plan exactly suited to your needs in the Johnson Addition. Lots are big and beautifully plotted.Rent-size monthly payments are easy to afford._ * and you'll be investing in property you'll be proud to own.If you presently own a too_ Seeded Lawn and Shrubs small home—or must dispose of property before you buy--discuss your problem.uith the Wilsons.The builders of the Johnson Addition are experienced realtors who can * Convenient to Churches and - help you plan to enjoy fhcadvtlntages of a big,new home sooner than you dreamed. Schools * Near New Carmel High School JOHNSON ADDITION * Complete Shopping Facilities in Carmel (SECOND SECTION) * Convenient to Public BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS Transportation S H E R M A N D. WILSON & SON, I'N C * Quiet and Attractive' "Office: 581 South Range Line Rd. VI 6-2554 * Free from City Corfgestioh \s. - i Evenih•gs: VI 6-8437 — VI 6-2033 Typical of developments of the period, homes are built towards the center of their lot, with ample front yards. The setback varies slightly from house to house to provide some irregularity with the overall neighborhood design. Corner lots feature houses built on a diagonal facing the intersection. Slightly curved streets and a cul-de-sac on Lantern Lane are both mid-century influences on the development design. Sherman D. Wilson and Son advertised Johnson Addition as convenient to churches, schools, public transportation, and near the Carmel High School. Residents find the benefits of living in Johnson Addition similar to when it was first constructed. 5 Johnson Addition is significant and nominated as a local historic district for its integrity as a Mid- Century neighborhood in the City of Carmel. It represents part of the building boom necessitated by the population growth of Carmel in the 1950s and 60s. The conservation area includes 94 contributing structures and I non-contributing structure. This illustrates the quality of construction and high value the neighborhood has placed on the preservation of its character. The average lot size in Johnson Addition is .34 acres with the average home totaling 1,469 s.f. The designated area includes all the original lots of the original Johnson Addition plat. The affordable housing in Johnson Addition has attracted many starting families and single professionals. The neighborhood itself currently houses several schoolteachers, nurses, police and fire emergency personnel. Historically speaking,Johnson Addition has been one of the centers of the community of Carmel, with its location, affordability, and sensible design attractive to those looking to find a home. 6 Lounda Map. I, 111 1111 1 I r V' ii*t ■■ ■ ��•�� , nd• ttt�Illllit •isi!... I III" jiui : 'J r ' ,,, � al_ 'i! t j utiii', i i !cad ail Dr. gii - _Yl ' him •. Vii _Maw 7 la i 1,g'l 1 ' Hi 7 I ■mii I armel Middle .� . .. ' chool Schgol ��. -. „q r.iI i 1 .I I r : ,, , . .,, _ I'i... Johnson Addition Conservation Area W Carmel Historic Preservation Commission Printed:Jun 10,2014 S TMz. ..............d:Ju 1 ,2tip: .: .�.......�...-..... .�, ..... ...........................,.�.....,...�. ...,..,.........wow>r........ f i .r......... ......ma........n.c.....•w.................,.......,.,.�..............e....V• .... •...•dm...... ....•....op..... .............................•......................... e---- ii ....r... .. .,.................... .......,......,b.Op.f...........w....e00....o.e......•... 11\i, 7 Building gnvan,tot 400 Emerson Rd This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential . building built in 1959. The foundation is concrete. . "~ - Exterior walls are replacement aluminum siding. The -4,91:_ ,. , ;,:i, building has a low side gable roof clad in replacement 44. ;-;' ,. asphalt shingles. Windows are replacement vinyl i 1 double-hung sashes. A large picture window is located �. in the southeast end of the primary facade. The property includes a detached garage to the northeast _.. of the residence that appears to contribute to its historic character. This is a lightly altered example of a typical late-I950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. : .� K 401 Emerson Rd a - Y. . ' - � ,, This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building ,-''',,,?4; . �I ..- built in 1959. The foundation is concrete. Exterior {t-11-' walls are original brick veneer. The building has a low _s� _ . -i hip roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles with box 4 1_ � ' cornice. The house has a simple wood frieze board. "" �` ��JL 3..g1 Windows are replacement vinyl double-hung sashes. Some original aluminum sliding sash also remain on the house. The property includes a garage that appears to °co contribute to its historic character. The garage is connected to the main house by an enclosed hyphen. This is a lightly altered example of a typical late-1950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. 402 Emerson Rd This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building with Mid-Century Modern influences built in lop. .4,.' 1963. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are ' _ - r„ original brick veneer. The primary roof is a low- -----t pitched cross gable which extends across 3 of the 4 bays, with a low side gable roof on the eastern bay. All roofs are clad in replacement asphalt shingles with box cornice. Windows appear to be original single pane aluminum sliding sashes. The entry features a simple box shed roof which extends over the doorway. A contemporary, single detached garage is located on the rear of the residence. This is a lightly altered example of a ranch house with Mid-Century Modern influences. 8 404 Emerson Rd , This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building ;,�. '° , Y g built in 1957. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls '"• -. .,„ . :, -.;• are replacement aluminum siding. The building has a low ,, , side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. ' Windows are replacement vinyl double-hung sashes. This killnim is a lightly altered example of a typical late-1950s ranch , ,•g Y P tYP house with little stylistic detailing 4""si°111r116 Hi P111.— .a" � ; 413 Emerson Rd ' '._" '4`'4; This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building "' built in 1959. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls K d„,.. are replacement aluminum siding. The building has a low side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. The 1, ..- roof features a projecting side gable on the southern end j 1 --. — ;:. - of the main facade, covering the attached one-car garage. Windows are replacement vinyl sliding sash. This is a typical example of an late-1950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. 414 Emerson Rd '„oil_ This is a 1-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building ;:,; built in 1955. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls -';�,��,r • S=, are original board and batten. The building has a low side .. - gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. There is 'jam one offset right, front slope, brick chimney. Windows are '��1. original aluminum sliding sash. This is a relatively '`' unaltered example of a mid-1950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. It is one of the oldest houses in the subdivision. _ • 11 vl •t + 425 Emerson Rd This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building : k' built in 1957. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls• .' are original brick veneer (lower) and original aluminum =` g (upper). The building siding has a low side gable roof g g r. clad in replacement asphalt shingles. Windows are ,, replacement vinyl double-hung sashes. There is a single- ` story, entry replacement porch characterized by a shed - roof clad in asphalt shingles with square wood posts. .,,.< _ r ~-'` — • - ': There is a single-story, rear, frame addition. This is an altered example of a typical late-1950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. 9 426 Emerson Rd This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building • built in 1959. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls t,�`' are replacement aluminum siding. The building has a low + ' • side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. The , ,. house has a protruding attached garage addition forming . an L-shaped wing on the south end of the house. Windows are replacement vinyl double-hung sashes. There is a single-story, front ell, frame addition. The property includes a garage that does not appear to ' contribute to its historic character. The detached garage dates to 1986. This is a heavily altered example of a typical late-1950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. 437 Emerson Rd This is a I-story, I-bay ranch residential building built in • � . 4.5 1957. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are ,- >. • replacement aluminum siding. The building has a low side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles with .- open cornice. Windows are replacement vinyl casements. There is a single-story, rear ell, frame addition. The large rear addition was built ca. 2000. This ,.'•141' is an altered example of a typical late-1950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. 438 Emerson Rd • r' This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building `-, , built in 1957. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls i'=' , .''_ are replacement aluminum siding. The building has a low `w'` J., side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles with open cornice. The house features a front gable garage _ connected to the main house by an enclosed hyphen. Windows are replacement vinyl double-hung sashes. This is , a lightly altered example of a late-1950s ranch house with � � little stylistic detailing. 10 .` 449 Emerson Rd .l. This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building fxt ,` . ;` built in 1959. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls "�` ",, y are original aluminum siding. The building has a low side .11Ato gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles with open ni A cornice. The house features a garage wing connecting to the main house on the southwest corner. The roof forms a cross gable on the south end of the main facade. There is a wood deck to the rear. The gable end of the garage wing features decorative half-timbering. Windows are original aluminum sliding sash. This is a relatively unaltered example of a late-I 950s ranch house with a partially detached garage. 451 Emerson Rd This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building `:„ •'. ..-".4 .■. s built in 1957. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls tor . are replacement aluminum siding. The building has a low i side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles with • ' .• open cornice. Windows are original aluminum sliding , y �' R e'" sash. The attached garage on the west end of the main facade has been converted to living space. The opening - has been infilled and covered with replacement siding .� and vinyl double-hung sash. This is an altered example of a typical late-1950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. 'T 452 Emerson Rd >, This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building ', built in 1957. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls iv are original wood siding. The building has a low side ---`' Z gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles with open h cornice. Windows are replacement vinyl fixed windows. - Some original aluminum sliding sash remain on the 4°` house. There is a single-story, rear, frame addition. There is also a large side addition on the building, built between 1962 and 1 974. The rear addition was built between 1974 and 1985. This is a heavily altered example of a late-1950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. II 463 Emerson Rd This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building built in 1959. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls . are original brick veneer. The building has a low hip roof .; . . clad in replacement asphalt shingles. The addition on the ,; east side and the rear addition have gabled roofs. There is one center, rear slope, brick chimney. Windows are original aluminum sliding sash. There is a single-story, side, frame addition. The side addition was built — — between 1974 and 1985. The rear addition dates to ca. 2001. This is a heavily altered example of a late-1950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. ` 'w - 474 Emerson Rd . },` ., This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building a f built in 1957. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls ir are original stone veneer. The building has a low side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles with open j ". * 4 I cornice. The roof features a projecting cross gable on the east end of the main facade, covering the attached garage. Two skylights have been added to the front and rear roof slopes. There is one offset right, straddle "vim d"R ridge, metal chimney. Small metal chimneys are a common characteristic of early ranch houses. Windows are replacement vinyl sliding sash. Windows to the east of the primary entry have been replaced with a vinyl bay window. The property includes a Pole Barn that does not appear to contribute to its historic character. The metal clad pole barn dates to ca. 2003. This is an altered example of a typical ranch house with little stylistic detailing. 475 Emerson Rd This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building built in 1957. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls ,_ .tip` are original wood siding. The building has a low side gable 4;., - ' roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. The roof features a projecting cross gable on the west end of the main facade, covering the attached one-car garage and the recessed entry porch. Windows are replacement .,u " vinyl double-hung sashes. There is a single-story, single- -, bay entry porch characterized by an integrated (under °" --- the main) roof with square wood posts. There is a single- story, rear, frame enclosed porch addition. This is an altered example of a late-1950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. I2 ,P.. 501 Emerson Rd This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building built in 1957. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are original brick veneer. The building has a low side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. Windows are replacement vinyl sliding sash. The windows to the west of the primary entry have been replaced with a vinyl bay window. There is a single- `"' story, rear, frame addition. The property includes a garage that does not appear to contribute to its historic character. The detached garage dates to ca. 1975. It has been connected to the main house by several small additions. The rear additions were built at various dates with the most recent occurring ca. 2009. The house likely had an attached garage on the western end of the main facade that has been converted to living space, with the garage opening infilled with brick, toothed in to match the surrounding wall. This is an altered example of a typical late-1950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. 514 Emerson Rd This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building • Y with Neocolonial influences built in 1 957. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are original brick veneer. The building has a low side gable roof clad in kne,r x replacement asphalt shingles. The roof features a ventilation cupola centered on the ridgeline above the h- - former attached garage. Windows are replacement vinyl x r __ ` double-hung sashes. There is a single-story, two-bay entry porch characterized by a shed roof clad in asphalt shingles with turned wood posts. The porch features segmental arches between the turned spindle post supports. The rear wall is clad in replacement vinyl siding. The property includes a garage that does not appear to contribute to its historic character. The detached garage dates to 1985. The original attached garage has been converted into living space, and the opening infilled and covered with vinyl siding. This is an altered example of a typical late-1950s ranch house with Neocolonial influences. It is a common house plan in the subdivision. v,.4 1- s''4, : 515 Emerson Rd A tee ,� This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building built I ** i,•, in 1959. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are replacement cementitious/hardy plank siding. The building • _ it replacement a low side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. Windows are original aluminum sliding sash. The overhead garage door has been removed and replaced with a second entrance door. The remaining space of the garage wall has been infilled and covered with siding. This is an altered example of a typical late-1950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. It is a common house plan in the subdivision. 13 t Y '• ' 525 Emerson Rd • - l'S do This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building . *, i;, * :v,,►; built in 1959. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are replacement cementitious/hardy plank siding. The ° li$, ` '4 building has a low side gable roof clad in replacement ii, f = asphalt shingles. Windows are replacement vinyl sliding ' M'. sash. This is a lightly altered example of a late-I 950s :L7 = :' ranch house with little stylistic detailing. 526 Emerson Rd Q„ 7 rf O. This is a 1-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building built in 1959. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls - a: are replacement cementations/hardy plank siding. The '' .i . '" ` building has a low side gable roof clad in replacement t- - - asphalt shingles. Windows are replacement vinyl sliding ) __ 1 ,4 sash. The full length windows to the west of the primary ---- entrance have been replaced with vinyl casements. This is an altered example of a typical early-1950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. '"' .`."1 537 Emerson Rd ♦ '1, This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building built in 1959. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls , .0' are replacement aluminum siding. The building has a low °' side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. The LL " roof features a protruding cross gable on the west end - of the main facade, covering the attached garage. The ` garage features its original overhead door. Windows are replacement vinyl casements. This is an altered example r — of a late-1950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. It is a variation of a common house plan in the subdivision. 538 Emerson Rd ` , . f This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building Y'- " built in 1959. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls - are replacement aluminum siding. The building has a low . hip roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. Windows ' - are replacement vinyl sliding sash. There is a single-story, side, frame addition. The addition was built between 1962 4 r- .-=--- and 1974. This is a heavily altered example of a late-1950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. 14 s % , •F <,-- ^ , ,° 549 Emerson Rd t r 3 . This is a 1-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building _e * 1 -. built in 1959. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls °' ,f are stone veneer. The building has a low side gable roof i : ° clad in replacement asphalt shingles. Windows are ,ii r. a, - `' replacement vinyl casements. A low stone veneer landscaping wall is located around the front patio. This is _ °� - " a lightly altered example of a late-1950s ranch house s with little stylistic detailing. 601 Emerson Rd _ ,,� „# _ ,� °. This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building � - -„. .,.. 4 ,,; ;°''3. built in 1959. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls _ *Vat ' g t ,- are original aluminum siding. The building has a low side " .- Imo. 1 9 .` •'' gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. The t ,„ house features a garage wing connecting to the main house on the northwest corner. The roof forms a cross R,,,,,,, ' 'w.' gable on the west end of the main facade. There is a ----- °"" *--- er wood deck to the rear. The gable end of the garage wing `" ° features decorative half-timbering. Windows are replacement vinyl double-hung sashes. The house also retains some original aluminum sliding sash. This is an lightly altered version of a late-I 950s ranch house with a partially detached garage. `,t,, 4.--7- w 602 Emerson Rd This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building % built in 1960. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls •rillr are original brick veneer. The building has a low side -.� gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. The roof . __ 41 1 ' features a ventilation cupola centered on the ridgeline _ above the attached garage. The house features a simple ---,,,-,f,.!- gam- wood frieze board. Windows are double-hung sashes. There is a single-story, two-bay entry porch characterized by a shed roof clad in asphalt shingles with square wood posts. The porch has been rebuilt, removing the original turned spindle supports and segmental arches. This is an altered example of an early I 960s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. The Neocolonial front porch has been replaced. It is a common house plan in the subdivision. 15 0 R 6 5 Emerson n e so Rd This is a I.5-story, 3-bay Cape Cod residential building ..• Y F„ '-,-.1•:. •• built in 1959. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls ''° ?e!, ' ,9:-..- A. are original brick veneer. The building has a high side gable ' �„ roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles and two gabled ,• ,� _, dormers. There is also one shed dormer on the rear roof _ a- L slope. There is one offset right, exterior, brick chimney. . ,� 1 ! i - Windows are original aluminum double-hung sashes. This w - is a late example of the Cape Cod house type. It is one of -0f ....-2`f two Cape Cods in the Johnson Addition subdivision. , 611 Emerson Rd This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building ,. built in 1959. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls • j� are original brick veneer. The building has a low side ,., gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. The roof features a projecting cross gable on the west end of the " ir - ; main facade, covering the attached one-car garage. Windows are replacement vinyl sliding sash. The r., -`"'•- property includes a garage that does not appear to • contribute to its historic character. The detached garage dates to 2001. This is a typical example of a late 1950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. It is a common house plan in the subdivision. 612 Emerson Rd , j ' This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building built •, in 1959. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are - original brick veneer. The building has a low side gable roof ' Ii% clad in replacement asphalt shingles. Windows are �.. replacement vinyl double-hung sashes. The primary entry is irk," centered on the front facade. This is a lightly altered example `" _�.-- ,a►' of a late 1950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. . 623 Emerson Rd ' . This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building I, built in 1959. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls +�' y wr ' _.` ►'-` . are original brick veneer. The building has a low hip roof 1-' clad in replacement asphalt shingles. Windows are t.;.• .1 original aluminum sliding sash. There is a single-story, rear, frame addition. The rear addition was built ....1111111111111..11111 between 1974 and 1985. This is a typical example of an altered ranch house with little stylistic detailing. 16 624 Emerson Rd This is a 2-story, 3-bay Bi-Level residential building built in 1961. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are original s brick veneer (lower) and replacement aluminum siding (upper). building has low side The bu as a ow s de able roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. The lower level roof covers the attached garage and features dentil molding and a wood frieze board below the roofline. The molding and frieze continues between the first and second levels of the main 0.00"r house. Windows are replacement vinyl double-hung sashes. The first story features a replacement bay window covered with a shed roof. This is an example of a typical Bi-Level house that has been altered with replacement siding and windows. It is the only Bi-Level house in the subdivision. 636 Emerson Rd This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building built in 1959. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are replacement vinyl siding. The building has a low side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. The roof features a projecting cross gable on the eastern end of P 1 g S F the main facade, covering the attached garage. Windows are replacement vinyl sliding sash. The wall below the sliding sash on the west end of the main facade is clad in brick veneer. This is an altered example of a late 1950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. It is a common house plan in the subdivision. 637 Emerson Rd This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building ,': ^'�+�' 4i1";*9 with Neocolonial influences built in 1960. The fi" foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are original brick •. ` veneer. The building has a low side gable roof clad in L replacement asphalt shingles. The roof features a 1f ventilation cupola centered on the ridgeline above the I( ,, 4 •I one-car attached garage. The house has a simple wood frieze that has been covered with vinyl siding. Windows ° are replacement double-hung sashes. There is a single- story, two-bay entry porch characterized by a shed roof clad in asphalt shingles with turned wood posts. The porch features segmental arches between the turned spindle support posts. This is a lightly altered example of an early 1960s ranch house with Neocolonial influences. It is a common house plan in the subdivision. 17 s } ' .' E ' 648 Emerson Rd 40'4 !0'. ,t ' This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building built in 1959. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are original brick veneer. The building has a low side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles with box ' z cornice. Windows are replacement double-hung sashes. . = There is a single-story, rear, frame addition. The rear addition was built between 1974-1985. This is typical example of a late 1950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. 649 Emerson Rd `%` •` '�` , 1. This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building built in 1960. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are original brick veneer. The building has a low side "' ,� x gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. Windows are replacement vinyl sliding sash. There is a single-story, rear, frame addition. The property includes a garage that does not appear to contribute to its historic character. The detached garage dates to 1994. This is a typical example of a late 1950s ranch house with little stylistic e itzt. • detailing. 654 Emerson Rd =K This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building built in 1960. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls y_ are replacement aluminum siding. The building has a medium side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt . shingles. The roof features a projecting cross gable on the east end of the main facade, covering the attached garage. Windows are replacement vinyl sliding sash. The wall beneath the sliding sash on the western end of the main facade is clad in brick veneer. This is an altered example of an early 1960s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. It is a common house plan in the subdivision. 18 655 Emerson Rd This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building �, { with Neocolonial influences built in 1 960. The "` ► "r'' foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are original brick veneer. The building has a low side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles with box cornice. Windows are double-hung sashes. There is a single-story, two-bay entry porch characterized by a shed roof clad in asphalt I shingles with turned wood posts. There is a single-story, rear, frame addition. A second carport addition is , located on the southwest end of the house. Both , additions were built between 1974-1985. This is an altered example of a ranch house with Neocolonial influences. It is a common house plan in the subdivision. -' 715 Emerson Rd This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building " r built in 1960. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are replacement aluminum siding. The building has a low hip roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. Windows :._ are original aluminum sliding sash. Windows to the south of the main entry are original full length aluminum windows with lower hoppers. The wall below the sliding 7 , ' sash windows on the north end of the main facade is clad in brick veneer. This is an altered example of a ranch house with little stylistic detailing. It is a hip-roof variation of a common house plan in the subdivision. 721 Emerson Rd This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building .. built in 1960. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls., are original brick veneer. The building has a low side gable "' ' •.. roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. Windows are original aluminum sliding sash. There is a single-story, rear, frame addition. This is an altered example of an early - 1960s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. 19 733 Emerson Rd This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building NI; built in 1960. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are original brick veneer (lower) and original aluminum siding (upper). The building has a low hip roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. Windows are replacement vinyl double-hung sashes. There is a single-story, inset entry porch characterized by an integrated (under the main) roof with square wood posts. This is a typical example of an early 1960s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. ,IF 749 Emerson Rd This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building built in 1958. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are replacement vinyl siding. The building has a medium side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. The roof features a projecting cross gable on the west end, covering the attached 1-car garage. Windows are ry replacement vinyl sliding sash. The sliding sash are on the eastern half of the front facade. The wall below these -_ - windows is clad in glazed gray brick. This is a typical example of an altered late 1950s ranch house. It is a common house plan in the subdivision. 803 Emerson Rd This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building f = r built in 1961. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls * are original brick veneer. The building has a medium side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. Windows are original aluminum double-hung sashes. This is a typical 1n- example of a ranch house with historic integrity. -- '° . h �_ ♦'� tom~ 20 " ": �'= 816 Emerson Rd M :4,4,,• r This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building s with Neocolonial influences built in 1959. The :- foundation is concrete. The building has a low side gable x ,,„,: , roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles with box e - cornice. Windows are original aluminum double-hung __. ,.,,,,; sashes. There is a single-story, two-bay entry porch characterized by a shed roof clad in asphalt shingles with turned wood posts. The porch features segmental arches between the turned spindle supports. This is a good example of a typical ranch house with Neocolonial influences. It is a common house plan in the subdivision. 817 Emerson Rd `_. °'11%111 11117 This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building * . built in 1960. The foundation is concrete. Exterior ''''"' ` ._' - " _ walls are replacement aluminum siding. The building has -.—a medium side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. Windows are original aluminum sliding sash. iff The house also features full length aluminum windows 6 _ with lower hoppers to the west of the primary entry. „„ .,„„„_. -„:----- There is a single-story, rear, frame addition. The lower v — part of the wall to the east of the entry is clad in glazed gray brick. The property includes a shed that does not appear to contribute to its historic character. The shed dates to ca. 1980. The rear addition dates to ca. 1990. This is a typical example of an altered, early 1 960s, ranch house. It is a common house plan in the subdivision. ` _ 825 Emerson Rd .� This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building built in 1958. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are original brick veneer. The building has a medium side ,, ♦ gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. Windows .....� are original aluminum sliding sash. There is a single-story, two-bay porch characterized by a shed roof clad in - - dam".:' asphalt shingles with square wood posts. The primary • ".+», ��4 entry is located on the front porch. The porch wall is clad in vertical wood siding. This is a typical example of a relatively unaltered ranch house that retains historic integrity. 2I •'3 1 10 Lantern Ln ... , This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building -.1,` . with Neocolonial influences built in 1960. The foundation ' iIN , seittii is concrete. Exterior walls are original brick veneer. The building has a low side gable roof clad in replacement (.1. . -fib asphalt shingles. A ventilation cupola is located on the - . roof rid g e lin e abo v e the attached garage. There is one offset right, front slope, brick chimney. Windows are 3 replacement vinyl, 6/6 double-hung sashes. There is a v single-story, entry porch characterized by a shed roof clad in asphalt shingles with turned wood posts. The porch features segmental arches between the turned spindle support posts. This is a lightly altered example of an early 1960s ranch house with Neocolonial influences. It is a common house plan in the subdivision. III Lantern Ln _. This is a I.5-story, 3-bay Cape Cod residential building y. *I" ' - in the Colonial Revival style built in 1960. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are original brick .iii -�*l veneer. The building has a high side gable roof clad in ''�-' replacement asphalt shingles with box cornice and two x -a, j 91 gabled dormers. The house features a plain wood frieze below the roofline. Windows are replacement vinyl, 6/6 double-hung sashes. This is a late example of a Colonial Revival Cape Cod house. 127 Lantern Ln .' This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building ' +_`..' built in 1960. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are original vertical wood siding. The building has a low 1,.lk -- side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles with Alio, •, .. 1 open cornice. The roof features a projecting cross gable on the south side, covering the attached garage. Windows are replacement vinyl double-hung sashes. The bilibL_F ,, wall under the replacement windows on the northern < end of the main facade is clad in brick veneer. This is a typical example of an early 1960s ranch house. It is a common house plan in the subdivision. 22 128 Lantern Ln r": •,... ,;';1` • This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building , ;_ - built in 1960. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls , ., =d,` are original brick veneer. The building has a low side ;. ` gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. Windows are original aluminum sliding sash. There is a single-story, recessed entry porch characterized by an s integrated (under the main) roof with turned wood posts. There is a single-story, rear, frame addition. The ` ` primary entry features the original front door. The rear w`. wall of the porch is clad in aluminum siding. This is a typical example of an altered ranch house. _ 136 Lantern Ln .f This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building ' '';., ^=0►'• built in 1960. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls•. 161 ,f. are replacement aluminum siding. The building has a s medium side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt rt • . )'e it*mow shingles. Windows are replacement vinyl sliding sash. - - -4' The wall below the sliding sash on the southern half of the house is clad in brick veneer. This is a typical - --° -s. --- example of an early 1960s ranch house. It is a common .._ house plan in the subdivision. 137 Lantern Ln This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building with Neocolonial influences built in 1960. The , foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are original brick ,.„—w... . . veneer. The building has a low side gable roof clad in ' replacement asphalt shingles with box cornice. The roof - features a ventilation cupola on the ridgeline above the attached garage. A simple wood frieze is located below the roofline. Windows are replacement vinyl, 6/6 / / double-hung sashes. There is a single-story, three-bay entry porch characterized by a shed roof clad in asphalt shingles with turned wood posts. The porch features segmental arches between the turned spindle support posts. This is a good example of an early 1960s ranch house with Neocolonial influences. It is a common house plan in the subdivision. 23 142 Lantern Ln This is a I-story, 5-bay ranch residential building with Mid-Century Modern influences built in 1960. The -- _ foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are original brick veneer. The building has a low side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. The building features a central projecting cross gable with exposed rafters over -- the recessed entry porch and the entry vestibule. The gable is supported on the open northern end by a wooden screen. Windows are original wood double-hung sashes. The projecting wing features a fixed, narrow, frosted glass window reaching from ground level to the roofline. There is a single-story, recessed entry porch. There is a single-story, rear, open frame porch addition. The porch walls are clad in board and batten siding. This is a lightly altered example of a ranch house with Mid-Century Modern influences. It is a common house type in the area. 145 Lantern Ln This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building " built in 1957. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls :r: are original aluminum siding. The building has a low side ,; _ • gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles with open e "`'e " • cornice. Windows are replacement vinyl sliding sash. 4 This is a typical example of an early 1950s ranch house. It is a common house plan in the subdivision. " . ,, <<. 149 Lantern Ln sf. . This is a 1-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building .4 • built in 1960. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are replacement aluminum siding. The building has a low ��l side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. The roof features a protruding cross gable on the southern end. Windows are replacement vinyl double-hung �.Y . sashes. There is a single-story, rear, frame addition. This is an typical example of an altered early 1960s ranch house. 24 421 WMainSt This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building + "::; , • built in 1 960. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls "' ,. are stone veneer. The building has a low hipped roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. Windows are _ replacement vinyl double-hung sashes. A bay window protrudes from the center of the facade. This is an example of an altered early 1960s ranch house. - 431 W Main St '",%0:1 This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building built in 1959. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls t'' '�► are stone veneer. The building has a low side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. The roof features a =' protruding cross gable on the western end. Windows are replacement vinyl double-hung sashes. This is an typical example of an altered early 1960s ranch house. 441 WMainSt - This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building z E' built in 1952. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are stone veneer. The building has a low hipped s roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. A wide, original brick chimney extends above the roof line. Windows are replacement 2-over-2, vinyl sashes. The entry porch features two square, wood columns supporting a low-pitched, hipped roof. An attached garage is located on the eastern end of the residence. This is a typical example of an altered early 1950s ranch house. 499 W Main St �t -; This 1-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building built in 1993 is non-contributing to Johnson Addition. r 25 525WMainSt . This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building built in 1958. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls : are original brick veneer. The building has a low hip roof w clad in replacement asphalt shingles. Windows are _ w � replacement vinyl sliding sash. There is a single-story, rrr"g7",, Y - .;' central bay entry porch characterized by a hip roof clad X: ,,. in asphalt shingles. This is a lightly altered example of a typical late-1950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. 605 W Main St This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building built in 1 958. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are . original brick veneer. The building has a low side gable roof r clad in replacement asphalt shingles. Windows are replacement vinyl casements. The window to the west of r.- the primary entry has also been replaced with a vinyl bay window. This is a lightly altered example of a typical late- 1950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. e- i-` 615 W Main St = ' ' - This is a 1-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building - 4 built in 1959. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are original brick veneer with original wood board and batten. The building has a low side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles with a wood soffit board. Windows are replacement vinyl casements, with a combination of 6-over-6 and 8-over-8 sashes. There is a single-story, three-bay entry porch characterized by a shed roof clad in asphalt shingles with square wood posts. The porch features segmental arches between the turned spindle support posts. This is a lightly altered example of a typical late-1950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. 26 100 Park Ln - e- This is a I-story, multiple-bay Vernacular residential A building built in 1959. The foundation is concrete. �' '° , ,.,�- Exterior walls are replacement aluminum siding. The Lite ' ., building has a low front gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles with open cornice. Windows are replacement vinyl double-hung sashes. There is a single- story, entry porch characterized by a gabled roof clad in asphalt shingles with square wood posts. There is a single-story, side, frame addition. The property includes a garage that appears to contribute to its historic character. The detached garage appears to date to the construction of the main house. It has been altered with a side lean-to addition and replacement sliding glass doors. The side addition was built sometime between 1962 and 1985. This is a heavily altered, front gable vernacular house that has lost the majority of its historic integrity. 105 Park Ln "' This is a I-story, 5-bay ranch residential building built in 1958. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are ' . original brick veneer (lower) and original wood siding . . (upper). The building has a low side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. There is one offset right, �- _ exterior, brick chimney. Windows are original aluminum , - sliding sash. This is a typical example of a late 1950s - - ranch house with little stylistic detailing that retains historic integrity. . ;> .v 1 12 Park Ln �'` °� This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building . ' ' • ; q, built in 1959. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls • ? are original wood siding.The building has a low side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. Windows are replacement vinyl double-hung sashes. -� . „z ,._K There is a single-story, rear ell, frame addition. The rear "` "`", , - - ''''" addition dates to ca. 2005. The attached garage has been ,, '� - heavily altered with the overhead doors removed and -,..,; i,,,m,,.-• - new openings created. The attached garage now resembles a carport. This is a heavily altered example of a late-1950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. It has lost the majority of its historic integrity. 27 125 Park Ln This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building built in 1959. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are •[ ,1 replacement vinyl siding. The building has a low side gable 1 roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles with open cornice. The house features an attached garage wing on the northwest corner of the house. Windows are replacement vinyl double-hung sashes. There is a single-story, side, frame enclosed porch addition. This is an altered example of a late 1950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. 126 Park Ln This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building with Neocolonial influences built in 1959. The .4-tif, foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are original brick ' '�' veneer. The building has a low side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles with box cornice. The roof • amr.-- - --. .-_u features a ventilation cupola centered on the ridgeline - °" above the attached one-car garage. The house has a plain wood frieze board. Windows are original, 6/6 double-hung sashes. There is a single-story, three-bay entry porch characterized by a shed roof clad in asphalt shingles with turned wood posts. The porch features segmental arches between the turned spindle support posts. The rear wall is clad in vertical wood siding. This is a relatively unaltered example of a late 1950s ranch house with Neocolonial influences that retains a high degree of historic integrity. It is a common house plan in the subdivision. 147 Park Ln This is a 1-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building __ �+"�dt, built in 1 959. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls , .. are replacement aluminum siding. The building has a low + :. 4 = y , side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles with '`" t " open cornice. The roof projects slightly over the .� northern bay, which contains the attached one-car garage. The projecting roof is supported by Y-shaped brackets. Windows are replacement vinyl, 8/8 double- hung sashes. There is a single-story, side, frame addition. is an altered example of a late-1950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. 28 1 4 '' :f.'", "' 148 Park Ln ''tea ". ` 'S This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building 1. built in 1959. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls t`-. :. i► : j,." : are replacement aluminum siding. The building has a low �, side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles with open cornice. The roof features a projecting cross gable on the north end of the main facade, covering the ;: original attached garage. The garage has been converted -$ to living space and the opening infilled and covered in aluminum siding. Windows are replacement vinyl sliding sash. The property includes a garage that does not appear to contribute to its historic character. The detached garage was built between 1962 and 1974. This is an altered example of a typical late-1950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. 7 Sherman Dr This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building .. 4 y,1.` i ,s s ' Y ',:.,...T.i:.±, built in 1964. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls ' V /1 t _ r are original brick veneer. The building has a low side R.; ,,, tit , gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. The house ' has a simple wood frieze board below the roofline. Windows are original aluminum double-hung sashes. l There is a single-story, two-bay porch characterized by a shed roof clad in asphalt shingles with square wood posts. The overhead garage door was recently replaced. This is a lightly altered example of a ranch house with little stylistic detailing. T -'+"::' 10 Sherman Dr This is a 1-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building r �` built in 1972. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls _' ".d .'`$,,-., _ are original brick veneer. The building has a hipped gable ,, roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. Windows are - .... replacement vinyl double-hung sashes. The openings on v .. the main facade feature wood panels above and below. '4•-° The side facades of the house are clad in vertical wood L_ " '= siding. There is a single-story, rear, frame addition. The rear addition dates to ca. 2005. This is a lightly altered example of an early 1970s ranch house. 29 22 Sherman Dr This is a split-story, multiple-bay split-level residential building built in 1961. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are original brick veneer (lower) and ' original aluminum siding (upper). The building has a low • hip roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. The lower, - lr= northern level of the house features a side gable roof. Windows are original aluminum double-hung sashes. There is a single-story, single-bay entry porch ' characterized by a shed roof clad in asphalt shingles with square wood posts. This is a relatively unaltered example of an early split-level house that retains historic integrity. It is the only split-level house in the Johnson Addition subdivision. .*0111 43 Sherman Dr i41 This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building 5.. � built in 1961. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls • , � are permastone (lower) and stone veneer (upper). The • ' / building has a low side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. The house has a projecting cross gable on the north end of the main facade, covering the attached garage. Windows are original aluminum sliding sash. This is a typical example of an early 1960s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. 44 Sherman Dr w .' • This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building �j••v with Mid-Century Modern influences built in 1961. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are original brick at . _ :1' veneer. The building has a low side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles with box cornice. The roof features a central protruding cross gable with "P ,.,.,111 exposed rafters that covers the entry vestibule and porch. Windows are replacement, 12/12 double-hung sashes. There is a single-story, recessed entry porch characterized by an integrated (under the main) roof with square wood posts. There is a single- story, rear, frame addition. This is an altered example of a ranch house with Mid-Century Modern influences and a large rear addition. 30 66 Sherman Dr This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building built in 1959. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are replacement vinyl siding. The building has a low side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles with box cornice. The roof features a large projecting cross gable on the southern end, covering the attached garage. • Windows are original aluminum sliding sash. This is a typical example of a ranch house with little stylistic detailing and replacement siding. 69 Sherman Dr This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building built in 1 960. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are original brick veneer (lower) and replacement aluminum siding (upper). The building has a low hip roof 744 clad in replacement asphalt shingles. The house features a projecting cross gable with a hip roof on the south end ' r l of the main facade, covering the attached garage and the entry porch. Windows are original aluminum louvered. There is a single-story, recessed entry porch characterized by an integrated (under the main) roof with square wood posts. This is a typical example of an early 1960s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. 85 Sherman Dr This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building -``} tot,. e . ' with Neocolonial influences built in 1960. The •foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are original brick =�' ��'>_ ` ! -. veneer. The building has a low side gable roof clad in P Nom- �' .' replacement asphalt shingles. There is a small ventilation *` '' t . . cupola on the northern end of the roof ridgeline. The _ mss, house has a simple wood frieze board. Windows are replacement vinyl, 6/6 double-hung sashes. There is ax:< single-story, three-bay porch characterized by a shed roof clad in asphalt shingles with turned wood posts. The porch covers the primary entry, the northern bay, and the attached one-car garage and features segmental arches between the turned spindle support posts. This is a lightly altered example of a early 1960s ranch house with Neocolonial influences. It is a common house plan in the subdivision. 31 88 Sherman Dr } This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building built in 1961. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are replacement aluminum siding. The building has a low '-� side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles with open cornice. Windows are original aluminum sliding sash. This is a typical example of a ranch house with little stylistic detailing. It is a rectangular variation of the = T common L-Plan ranch design common in the subdivision. 102 Sherman Dr i z This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building in the Mid-Century Modern style built in 1961. The y' ti foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are original brick I veneer. The building has a low side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles with open cornice. The 1 w roof features a cross gable with exposed rafters on the northern half of the house, covering the recessed entry porch, entry vestibule, and attached garage. Windows , are original aluminum sliding sash. Windows feature wood paneling below the sash. The paneling is also found above the garage door. There is a single-story, recessed entry porch characterized by an integrated (under the main) roof. The porch walls are clad in board and batten siding, and plain vertical wood siding. This is a relatively unaltered example of a Mid-Century Modern ranch house that retains a high degree of historic integrity. 107 Sherman Dr This is a 1-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building s with Mid-Century Modern influences built in 1961. The foundation is brick. Exterior walls are stone veneer. The j.. building has a low side gable roof clad in replacement j - asphalt shingles. The roof features a protruding central cross gable covering the entry vestibule and porch. = `' Windows are replacement vinyl double-hung sashes. i' Windows are flanked by decorative vinyl shutters. The entry vestibule window is also a replacement. There is a single-story, single-bay entry porch characterized by an integrated (under the main) roof with square wood posts. There is a single- story, rear, frame enclosed porch addition. This is an altered version of an early 1960s ranch house with Mid-Century Modern influences. 32 zitx; 123 Sherman Dr ' This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building with Mid-Century Modern influences built in 1960. The lir"- foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are original brick ,- veneer. The building has a low side gable roof clad in '* k Ne replacement asphalt shingles. The roof features a hr-A:.;' _ � , ,. projecting central cross gable with exposed rafters ° , - `"� -, covering the entry vestibule and porch. Windows are original, 6/6 double-hung sashes. There is a single-story, single-bay entry porch characterized by an integrated (under the main) roof with square wood posts. There is a single-story, rear, frame enclosed porch addition. This is a lightly altered example of an early 1960s ranch house with Mid- Century Modern influences. 124 Sherman Dr ' 1-t- -Miltii t,„,,,tr.,! This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building . f with Mid-Century Modern influences built in 1959. The - ; ._ ,fir `:' foundation is concrete. The building has a low side gable ' ' •: - , - roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles with box , cornice. The roof features a central cross gable with exposed rafters covering the entry porch and vestibule. Windows are replacement vinyl, 8/8 double-hung sashes. The narrow vestibule o window has been replaced as bee ep aced with glass block. There is a single-story, single-bay entry porch characterized by an integrated (under the main) roof. The porch support on the north is a dimensional wood screen. The rear porch wall is clad in board and batten siding. This is an altered example of a ranch house with Mid- Century Modern influences. IIIFW-7 ' 40- ?F i, 141 Sherman Dr - -ur Ti This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building .t built in 1960. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls r4 - -,..� are original brick veneer (lower) and replacement +- „ --,4 aluminum siding (upper). The building has a low side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. The roof . features a projecting cross gable on the south end of the himpormivoinip main facade, covering the attached one-car garage and the small recessed entry porch. Windows are replacement louvered. There is a single-story, single-bay entry porch characterized by an integrated (under the main) roof with square wood posts. This is a typical example of an altered early 1960s ranch house. 33 146 Sherman Dr This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building ,• built in 1959. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls .1: �' are original brick veneer. The building has a low side : gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. There is ,x one center, rear slope, brick chimney. Windows are 0' — original aluminum sliding sash. There is a single-story, two-bay entry porch characterized by a shed roof clad in asphalt shingles with square wood posts. There is a single-story, rear, frame addition. The southern wall of the porch contains a dimensional wood screen. The rear wall is clad in vertical wood siding. This is an altered example of a ranch house with little stylistic detailing. It is a common house plan in the subdivision. "' •I € iAIP 'S! 158 Sherman Dr This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building Ni built in 1958. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls .. are original vertical wood siding. The building has a low • side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles with open cornice. The roof features a projecting cross gable e-'`' ` 4: on the northeast side, covering the attached garage. Windows are replacement vinyl sliding sash. The original casement windows to the northeast of the front door have been replaced with vinyl double-hung sash. There is a single-story, rear, frame addition. This is an altered example of a late 1950s ranch house. It is a common house plan in the subdivision. 55 York Dr ` ti This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building :mot _ }` ' , :, '` I built in 1955. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls 'N 1 � . .i are original brick veneer (lower) and replacement aluminum siding (upper). The building has a low side " _ ; _ gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. --_4. L11 u Windows are replacement vinyl double-hung sashes. Vi=i This is an altered example of a mid-1950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. It is one of the earliest houses built in the subdivision. 34 V.-T " r. 56 York Dr ....vi, This is a 1-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building A built in 1958. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are original stone veneer (lower) and original vertical wood siding (upper). The building has a low side gable '`� it roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles with open cornice. Windows are replacement vinyl sliding sash. This is a lightly altered example of a typical late-I 950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. It is a common house plan in the subdivision. 77 York Dr _, isivr '11,j.„� This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building ' '`e built in 1958. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are original brick veneer. The building has a low side l gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. The roof f 'II v "'In features a projecting cross gable on the north end of the L main facade, covering the attached two-car garage. "`` .K Windows are replacement vinyl sliding sash. This is a lightly altered example of a late-1950s ranch house with 1 little stylistic detailing. 1 78 York Dr ! " This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building , ' y built in 1958. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls . t are original brick veneer. The building has a low hip roof Y r `T clad in replacement asphalt shingles. Windows are original aluminum sliding sash. This is a relatively unaltered example of a typical late-1950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. - 35 101 York Dr This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building built in 1960. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are original brick veneer. The building has a low side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles with box - _ cornice. The roof features a ventilation cupola centered on the ridgeline above the attached one-car garage. The house features a simple wood frieze board. Windows are replacement vinyl double-hung sashes. There is a single-story, two-bay porch characterized by a shed roof clad in asphalt shingles with turned wood posts. The porch features segmental arches between the turned spindle support posts. The rear wall of the porch is clad in vertical wood siding. The porch has a replacement banister and balustrade. There is a single-story, rear, frame addition. The rear addition was built between 1962 and 1974. This is an altered example of an early 1960s ranch house with Neocolonial influences. It is a common house plan in the subdivision. 102 York Dr _: This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building built in 1959. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls • ,, ,., are replacement vinyl siding. The building has a low side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. _f '_ -- Windows are replacement vinyl double-hung sashes. -$1110.14; This is an altered example of a typical late-1950s ranch ,.F house with little stylistic detailing. 125 York Dr This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building " built in 1958. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls - ".' are original board and batten. The building has a low side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. Windows ; ,;`' pi are replacement vinyl sliding sash. There is a single-story, - rear, frame addition. The rear addition dates to ca. 2005. This is an altered example of atypical late-1950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. 36 , 1 126 York Dr s ;/ This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building ,, s, •. n. + ? built in 1959. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls ' are original board and batten. The building has a low side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. The roof projects slightly on the northern half of the main facade and covers the front entry porch and attached one-car garage. Windows are replacement vinyl sliding sash. There is a single-story, two-bay entry porch characterized by an integrated (under the main) roof with square wood posts. This is a lightly altered example of a typical ranch house with little stylistic detailing. 35 York Dr This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building - „# built in 1 958. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are replacement vinyl siding. The building has a low side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. The roof f features a projecting cross gable on the south end of the . } }' main facade, covering the attached one-car garage. -,rr,�16-' Windows are replacement vinyl sliding sash. This is an altered version of a typical late-1950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. It is a common house plan in the subdivision. -, 136 York Dr 4 � r . ��, 0 a t I This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building "y„ 0 built in 1959. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls 4 are original wood siding. The building has a low side gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. Windows are original aluminum sliding sash. Windows - -, _ "", also feature vinyl storm windows. There is a single-story, rear, frame addition. There is also a second addition on the rear of the house. The rear additions are located on the north and south ends of the west facade. Both were built between 1974 and 1985. This is an altered example of a typical late-1950s ranch house with little stylistic detailing. 37 148 York Dr `f��`: -. l.. This is a I-story, multiple-bay ranch residential building h ,. built in 1959. The foundation is concrete. Exterior walls are original brick veneer. The building has a low side '* gable roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles with box cornice. The house features a simple wood frieze aor board. Windows are replacement vinyl sliding sash. There is a single-story, rear, frame addition. The ._ property includes a Gazebo that does not appear to contribute to its historic character. The gazebo dates to 1995. The rear addition was built between 1974 and 1985. This is a t yp ical example of an altered late-1950s ranch house with little stylistic ty li st i c detailing. 38 Tat m.inolo yy Historic District: A full historic district regulates all exterior changes to a property, site or setting. Conservation District: A conservation district is a less regulated version of a historic district. In a conservation district, only new construction of a principal new or accessory building, demolition, and moving buildings are reviewed by the CHPC. Principal Building: Also known as a primary building, the single family dwelling occupying a single lot. Subject to Review and Approval: Items that must be submitted to the CHPC through an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness. Classifications The following terms are used in the Carmel Historic Preservation Commission Ordinance to classify buildings: Outstanding (0) The "0" rating means that the property has enough historic or architectural significance that it is already listed, or should be considered for individual listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Outstanding resources can be of local, state, or national importance. Notable (N) A rating of"N" means that the property did not quite merit an Outstanding rating, but is still above average in its importance. Further research or investigation may reveal that the property could be eligible for National Register listing. Contributing (C) A "C" rating was given to any properties meeting the basic inventory criterion of being pre- 1960, but that are not important enough to stand on their own as individually outstanding or notable. Such resources are important to the density or continuity of the area's historic fabric. Contributing properties can be listed on the National Register of Historic Places if they are part of an historic district, but would not usually qualify individually. Non-Contributing (NC) Properties rated "NC" are not important enough to stand on their own as individually outstanding or notable and were not included in the inventory unless they were located within an historic district. Such properties are usually either post-I970 or they are older structures that have been badly altered and have lost their historic character or they are otherwise incompatible with their historic surroundings. Note: In these pages the term"contributing"properties often refers to all of the properties that contribute to the historic significance of the area,including both outstanding and notable properties. 39 tit g: a• Wen H.SoseE • 1. Ft No • ■ ■ II �' S' ■I c,..-= 1 • t jib ■ L ■ x ■ ■ ` L r V. ■ ■ MI • ll ■ ■.—= ♦ t. ♦ ♦ 41// , �.r_ _p ANNUM . — 6 . III MINIM r Johnson Addition Conservation District Carmel Historic Preservation Commission Outstanding Otluot Boundary ■ Notable = Roads Conutbuung ■ Non.Const ibuung t Acemtvatian C3ir jactiveJ BUILDING OBJECTIVES • To support and encourage the preservation, maintenance, and rehabilitation of existing contributing and non-contributing structures in a manner that complements and reflects the history and character of Johnson Addition. • To maintain the existing character with a residential land use. NEW DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES • To account for growth and potential development in Johnson Addition, support and encourage new construction to be compatible with and enhances the existing landscape. • All new construction within Johnson Addition shall maintain consistency of design by utilizing existing contributing buildings. • All lots within Johnson Addition shall maintain their original lot size. • All secondary buildings shall be visually compatible with the neighborhood. 41 Stanclatc16 bat Naar eanstocuctian The purpose of new construction standards is to present concepts, alternatives, and approaches which will produce design solutions that recognize the characteristics of the Johnson Addition Conservation District and bring harmony between new and existing buildings. The standards are not meant to restrict creativity, but to set up a framework within which sympathetic design will occur. It should be noted that within an appropriate framework there can be many different design solutions which may be appropriate. CONTEXT FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION Design standards serve as aids in designing new construction which reacts sensitively to the existing context. The most important first step in designing new construction in any conservation district, therefore, is to determine just what the context is. Contributing properties are important to the density and continuity of Johnson Addition. Every site possesses a unique context, which comprises the contributing buildings immediately adjacent, the nearby area (often the surrounding block), and the district as a whole. Generally, new construction will occur on sites which fall into the following categories. For each one described below, there is an indication of the context to which new construction must be primarily related. 3 ■ Iv ,,,, .,„ 112 , - ,T.. ,. . e. . - - t t,...., ,—,,' n m � II e •mm6n ' yr x. ire iblit_ ^N to i 1962 Aerial ofJohnson Addition, Hamilton County and City of Carmel GIS 42 SITE CATEGORIES Developed Site Isolated Lot Large Site This is usually a single This is usually a jot vacant lot (sometimes two combination of several very small lots combined) vacant lots, often the which exists in a highly result of previous ijigritifit developed area with very demolition or natural 16 I ir few if any other vacant lots disaster. in view. U I IF• Context. Its surrounding context has been weakened by its very existence. However, A site upon which there is context is still of primary already an existing concern. In such a case, a contributing principal ,... r.,AWA . somewhat larger area than structure. New 1 the immediate construction usually ` 11111 lb environment must also be involves the construction looked to for context, of an accessory building II I IF especially if other vacant such as a garage. land exists in the immediate area. Context. New construction must use contributing Context. The existing building as the most contributing buildings 4 important, perhaps only, immediately adjacent and context. It should not in the same block and the overwhelm in scale or facing block provide a very tifirOgrig proportion and should not strong context to which I ALA exceed the height of the any new construction must I 1111 I principal building. primarily relate. 43 PRINCIPAL BUILDINGS Definition:A principal building is the single family dwelling occupying a single lot. SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL Construction of any new principal building within the district boundary. The first step to take in designing new construction is to define the context within which it will exist. Once the context is understood, the following standards are meant to assist in finding a compatible design response. Setbacks, orientation, entry, spacing, heights, and outline are elements that generally relate to a building's fit within its surrounding street and alley character. Mass, foundation, elevations, materials, openings, fenestration, and porches are elements that generally describe the architectural compatibility of a new building to its existing neighbors. SETBACK Definition: The distance a building is set back from a street or property line. In Johnson Addition, the longest sides of houses are most commonly placed parallel to the street and relatively in line with adjacent houses. New residential buildings should also be parallel to the street with setback to fit with adjacent contributing buildings. Recommended A new building's setback should conform to the setback pattern established by the existing block context. On corner sites, the setbacks from both streets must conform to the context. Structures that are much closer or further from the street than the vast majority of houses in a given block should not be used to determine appropriate setback. I 444*/ too for appropriate Pli ✓ ■ ✓ ■ Setback 44 ORIENTATION Definition: The direction a building faces. In Johnson Addition, houses are usually oriented with their longest side and main entrance facing and parallel to the street. Recommended New buildings should be oriented toward the street in a way that is characteristic of surrounding contributing buildings. ✓ ✓ail is ✓ ✓ i 44•*4V $;* x ✓ a ✓ ■ ✓ II Orientation BUILDING ENTRY Definition: The actual and visually perceived approach and entrance to a building. Recommended New buildings should reflect a similar sense of entry to that which is expressed by surrounding contributing buildings. Frequently, mid-century entrances are located perpendicular to the facade at the end of a jutting addition or a porch. 45 SPACING Definition: The distance between contiguous buildings along a block face. Recommended New construction that reflects and reinforces the spacing found in its block. New construction should maintain the perceived regularity or lack of regularity of spacing on the block. [12 :=1) I 1--1 X ✓ ✓ Building Spacing BUILDING HEIGHT Definition: The actual height of buildings and their various components as measured from the ground's existing grade at the foundation, relative to the grade of the street that the building faces. In Johnson Addition, the topography of the lots is often gently rolling and varied; therefore, new construction must blend and flow with the existing topography. NOTE: In areas governed by this plan, building heights should be determined using these standards, rather than those noted in the zoning ordinance. Recommended Generally, the height of a new building should fall within a range set by the highest and lowest contiguous contributing buildings if the block has uniform heights. Uncharacteristically high or low buildings should not be considered when determining the appropriate range. Cornice heights, porch heights and foundation heights in the same block face (on the same side of the street) should be considered when determining the appropriate range. Consider the grade of the lot against the grade of the adjacent street, as well as the grade of the adjacent contributing buildings. /N / \ A ✓ ✓ X ✓ ✓ Building Height 46 BUILDING OUTLINE Definition: The silhouette of a buildin g as seen f rom the street. Recommended The basic outline of a new building, including general roof shape, should reflect building outlines typical of Johnson Addition. The outline of new construction should reflect the directional orientations characteristic of the existing contributing buildings in its context. r=11 ✓ ✓ X ✓ ✓ Building Outline 47 DESIGN STANDARDS The following standards relate to the construction of any new principal (or primary) building. Mid-century modern forms and designs are considered appropriate. Contributing buildings in Johnson Addition should be studied for their characteristic design elements. Significant features define compatibility, such as roofing, entryways, how a house is set on its foundation, chimneys, gables, overhanging eaves, and porches. When analyzing the design of contributing buildings, consider original materials and designs, rather than later modifications to the buildings. MASS Definition: The three dimensional outline of a building. Depending on the block face, buildings in Johnson Addition may reflect the traditional horizontal mass of the mid-century modern house forms. The architectural description of the properties in Johnson Addition provides examples of typical house forms and building parts. Recommended The total mass and site coverage of a new building should be consistent with adjacent contributing buildings. The massing of the various parts of a new building should be characteristic of adjacent contributing buildings. Consider the mass of all building parts (i.e., house, attached garage, integrated porch, and breezeway). 11 El Massing 48 FOUNDATION/ FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION Definition: The supporting base upon which a building sits and the finished elevation of the first floor living space. Recommended New construction first floor elevation and foundation height should be consistent with contiguous contributing buildings. New construction first floor elevation and foundation height should fit into the natural (not man-made) gradient of the land. /\ issisameasmagmaximmata ✓ ✓ x ✓ ✓ Foundation OPENINGS/FENESTRATION Definition: The design, arrangement, and proportioning of windows, doors, and openings. Recommended Paying attention to the proportion of openings in a wall visible from the street can help blend new construction into the streetscape. Horizontal shapes and combinations of windows are integral to the look of the wall. Creative use of commercially available window shapes and sizes can help mimic typical mid-century modern patterns. Creative expression with fenestration is not precluded, but should not conflict with or draw attention from the basic fenestration pattern of adjacent contributing buildings. Doors are important to the overall design as well. They usually feature small glass panes in various geometric patterns. Entryways are often hidden, but distinctive. ❑ '1 A=EI ❑. Windows Doors Garage Doors 49 MATERIALS Definition: The visual, structural, and performance characteristics of the materials visible on a building exterior. Recommended Building materials, whether natural or man-made, should be visually compatible with surrounding contributing buildings. When hardboard or concrete board siding is used to simulate wood clapboard siding, it should reflect the general directional and dimensional characteristics found historically in the neighborhood. Limestone/stone veneer, brick, clapboard, and wood siding are appropriate materials. PATIOS AND PORCHES Definition: Flat constructed areas, adjacent to the house, which extend the living space into the exterior environment. Recommended Building materials include laid brick, concrete, stone, and wood. 50 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL Construction of any new accessory building within the district boundary. Definition:Any structure secondary to the principal building on the lot and greater than 150 square feet in size is subject to the following standards. Recommended New structures should be placed in a subordinate position and, where possible, to the rear of the principal building on the lot. In some cases, garages should be placed attached to the principal residence. New structures accessory to principal buildings should be visually compatible in shape and materials with existing Johnson Addition patterns. New structures should be proportionately smaller, both in height and size of footprint, than the principal building on the lot. OTHER ISSUES UTILITIES & EQUIPMENT Definition:Any utilities that might be above ground and visible (such as meters and electric lines) and any mechanical equipment associated with the building (such as air-conditioning equipment). PARKING & STORAGE ACCESS Definition:Locations of driveways and access to storage of all vehicles, including but not limited to cars, RVs, boats, ATVs, trailers, etc. Recommended Driveways should be built with direct access to parking or storage structures and pass along the side or rear of the princiapl building. Oversized parking pads in view of the street are discouraged. FENCES Fences are not regulated in Johnson Addition, but an inappropriate fence can deface the streetscape. Wooden, metal, and vinyl privacy fences (including stockades, basket weave, and chain link) are relatively modern styles of fencing and should be hidden in rear yards, if possible. 51 S'tan„da'd3 cot MoViny fliuldinys MOVING BUILDINGS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL Relocation or move of any building within the district boundary. The moving of any building in the Johnson Addition Conservation District should only be done as a last resort to save the building. It may also be considered when necessary to maintain the historic context of Johnson Addition. The following standards are meant to assist in determining the appropriateness of moving any building within, into, or out of Johnson Addition. STANDARDS The following standards are enforceable by the Carmel Historic Preservation Commission and are less comprehensive and less restrictive than for an historic district. Recommended The building to be moved should be compatible with the contributing architecture surrounding its new site relative to style, scale, and era. Small non-contributing storage buildings (under 150 square feet) in backyards may be moved without review. Contributing accessory structures (over 150 square feet) require review according to standards for compatible new construction. 52 gtancla.sr.d3 bet Demolition STANDARDS FOR DEMOLITION SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL Demolition of any building within the district boundary. This section explains the type of work considered in this plan to be demolition to be used when reviewing applications for Certificates of Appropriateness that include demolition. A Certificate of Appropriateness must be issued by the Carmel Historic Preservation Commission before a demolition permit is issued by other agencies of the city and before work is begun on the demolition of any building in Johnson Addition. Review and approval is required for demolition of principal buildings within the boundaries of the Johnson Addition Conservation District. STANDARDS The following standards relate to the above actions and they are enforceable by the Carmel Historic Preservation Commission. For the purpose of this plan, demolition shall be defined as the razing, wrecking or removal by any means of the entire or partial exterior of a structure. The following examples are meant to help define demolition and are not all-inclusive: I. The razing, wrecking or removal of a total structure. 2. The razing, wrecking or removal of part of a structure, resulting in a reduction in its mass, height or volume. 3. The razing, wrecking or removal of an enclosed or open addition. Partial demolition includes the alteration, pulling down, destruction, or removal of a portion of a structure which may include, but not be limited to, the removal of a defining architectural feature or element which defines or contributes to the historic character of the structure. Partial demolition may also be defined as the removal of twenty-five percent (25%) of the structure, including its roof, if the part which is removed is on a façade which is subject to view from a public thoroughfare. Partial demolition may be required as part of construction of an addition onto a principal building, but shall be reviewed by the Commission if the demolition work is such that it shifts the project into substantial new construction and it is visible from a public right of way. Examples of work not included in demolition: I. Any work on the interior of a structure. 2. The removal of small exterior elements of the structure that are not structurally integrated with the main structure and are generally considered rehabilitation, such as utility and mechanical equipment, awnings, gutters, downspouts, light fixtures, fire escapes, signs, paint, fencing, sidewalks, streets, curbs, landscaping, asphalt, and clear glass with no historic markings. Such work may require a Certificate of Appropriateness under other standards in this plan. 53 APPROVAL The CHPC requires a Certificate of Appropriateness for demolition if any of the proposed activities include razing, wrecking or removal of any part of the structure. The CHPC may ask interested individuals or organizations for assistance in seeking an alternative to demolition. The Commission will also consider how the loss of a building, or a portion thereof, will affect the character of the surrounding area, and in the case of partial demolition, the building itself. When considering a proposal for demolition, the CHPC shall consider the following criteria for demolition as standards for determining appropriate action: I. The structure poses an immediate and substantial threat to the public safety. The condition of the building resulting from neglect shall not be considered grounds for demolition. 2. The historic or architectural significance of the structure or part thereof is such that, in the Commission's opinion, it does not contribute to the historic character of the structure and the historic area, or the context thereof. 3. The building is incapable of earning an economic return on its value, as appraised by a qualified real estate appraiser. 4. In the case that the building is accidentally damaged by storm, fire, or flood, it may be rebuilt to its former configuration and materials without regard to the demolition and new construction standards if work is commenced within 6 months. With the exception of Criterion #4, all replacement of demolished properties should follow new construction standards. CONDITION Demolition of a structure may be justified by condition. In certain instances, demolition of selective parts of the building may be authorized after proper evaluation by the Carmel Historic Preservation Commission. SIGNIFICANCE The Commission has the responsibility of determining the significance of a structure and whether it contributes to the district. It shall consider the architectural and historical significance of the structure individually, in relation to the street, and as a part of the district as a whole. These same considerations will be given to parts of the building. The Commission will also consider how the loss of a structure, or a portion thereof, will affect the character of the district, the neighboring buildings, and in the case of partial demolition, the building itself. Buildings that are noted in the plan as non-contributing or potentially contributing shall be researched to confirm that there is no obscured architectural or historical significance. In making its determination of significance, the Commission shall consider the following: I. Architectural and historical information included in this plan. 2. Information contained in the district's National Register nomination (if one exists). 3. Information contained in any other professionally conducted historic surveys pertaining to this district. 4. The opinion of its professional staff. 5. Evidence presented by the applicant. 54 6. Evidence presented by recognized experts in architectural history. REPLACEMENT BUILDING When proposing new construction as the result of the demolition of an existing structure, the applicant must follow the Standards for New Construction. To guide the Commission in evaluating the compatibility of the replacement building within the new construction design standards, the applicant shall submit the following information as required by the Commission or its staff: I. Elevations and floor plans. 2. A scaled streetscape drawing showing the new construction in its context (usually including at least two building on either side). 3. A site plan showing the structure(s) to be demolished and the new building. 4. A written description of the new construction. 5. A time schedule for construction and evidence that the new construction will occur. 6. Any other information which would assist the Commission in determining the appropriateness of the new construction. ECONOMICS The owner has the responsibility of presenting clear and convincing evidence to the Commission as to the incapability of the structure of earning an economic return on its value. The Commission may prepare its own evaluation of the property's value, feasibility for preservation, or other factors pertinent to the case. To afford the Commission the ability to consider the economic factors of demolition, the applicant shall submit the following information when required by the Commission: I. Estimate of the cost of the proposed demolition and an estimate of any additional costs that would be incurred to comply with recommendations of the Commission for changes necessary for the issue of a Certificate of Appropriateness. 2. A report from a licensed engineer or architect with experience in rehabilitation as to the structural soundness of the structure and its suitability for rehabilitation. 3. Estimated market value of the property both in its current condition, and after completion of the proposed demolition to be presented through an appraisal by a qualified professional appraiser. 4. An estimate from an architect, structural engineer, real estate consultant, appraiser, or other real estate professional experienced in rehabilitation as to the economic feasibility of rehabilitation or reuse of the existing structure. 5. For property acquired within five years of the date an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness is filed: amount paid for the property, the date of acquisition, and the party from whom acquired, including a description of the relationship, if any, between the owner of record or applicant and the person from whom the property was acquired, and any terms of financing between the seller and buyer. 6. Remaining balance on any mortgage or other financing secured by the property and annual debt service, if any, for the previous two years. 7. All appraisals obtained within the previous two years by the owner or applicant in connection with the purchase, financing or ownership of the property. 55 8. Any listing of the property for sale or rent, price asked and offers received, if any, within the previous two years. 9. Copy of the most recent real estate tax bill. 10. Form of ownership or operation of the property, whether sole proprietorship, for profit or non-for-profit corporation, limited partnership, joint venture, or other method. I I. Any other information which would assist the Commission in making a determination as to whether the property does yield or may yield a reasonable return to the owners, e.g. proforma financial analysis. 56 • 7'ri¢nnial Review. In accordance with state (IC 36-7-I I) and local (D-2064-I I) statutes regarding local historic preservation commissions, a conservation district automatically becomes a historic district after three years, provided the majority of property owners in that district do not object to the change in designation. Please see the Carmel Historic Preservation Ordinance for guidelines on maintaining a conservation district or establishing a full historic district, which regulates all exterior changes to a property, site or setting. "FOR CONSERVATION DISTRICTS The Carmel Historic Preservation Ordinance (D-2064-I I) permits the Carmel Historic Preservation Commission to establish a historic district in two (2) phases. The first phase, a conservation district, continues for a period of three (3) years from the date the ordinance is adopted. This requires a Certificate of Appropriateness for the following activities: I. The construction of a new building or accessory building 2. The moving of any building 3. The demolition of any building At the expiration of the initial three (3) year period, the first phase of a conservation district continues and the second phase, a historic district, does not become effective if a majority of the property owners in the district object to the Commission, in writing, to the requirement that Certificates of Appropriateness be issued for the following activities: 1. A conspicuous change in the exterior appearance of historic buildings by additions, construction, alteration, or maintenance involving exterior color changes; 2. A change in walls and fences or construction of walls and fences, if along public ways; 3. A conspicuous change in the exterior appearance of non-historic buildings subject to view from a public way by additions reconstruction, alteration, or maintenance involving exterior color change. In order to stay a conservation district, the objections of a majority of the property owners must be received by the Commission not earlier than one hundred eighty (180) days, or later Y g tY ( ) Y than sixty (60) days before the third anniversary of the adoption of the conservation district ordinance." 7eoceduaas toot eeaeyiny due S'teadaseds Changes to the standards, if desired, shall be initiated from and drafted by the residents of Johnson Addition. The neighborhood organization shall inform the Carmel Historic Preservation Commission of the proposed changes to the standards. All property owners in the Conservation District shall be notified of the proposed changes to the standards and will be provided copies of the proposed changes along with notice of the time and place of the public hearing on the proposal. Any proposed changes to the standards require approval by the Carmel Historic Preservation Commission. 57 Johnson Addition Conservation District: Building Index Address Classification Date Notes 400 Emerson Rd Contributing 1959 401 Emerson Rd Contributing 1959 402 Emerson Rd Contributing 1963 404 Emerson Rd Contributing 1957 413 Emerson Rd Contributing 1959 414 Emerson Rd Contributing 1955 425 Emerson Rd Contributing 1957 426 Emerson Rd Contributing 1959 437 Emerson Rd Contributing 1957 438 Emerson Rd Contributing 1957 449 Emerson Rd Contributing 1959 451 Emerson Rd Contributing 1957 452 Emerson Rd Contributing 1957 463 Emerson Rd Contributing 1959 474 Emerson Rd Contributing 1957 House 474 Emerson Rd Non-Contributing 2003 Garage/Barn 475 Emerson Rd Contributing 1957 501 Emerson Rd Contributing 1957 514 Emerson Rd Contributing 1957 515 Emerson Rd Contributing 1959 525 Emerson Rd Contributing 1959 526 Emerson Rd Contributing 1959 537 Emerson Rd Contributing 1959 538 Emerson Rd Contributing 1959 549 Emerson Rd Contributing 1959 601 Emerson Rd Contributing 1959 602 Emerson Rd Contributing 1960 605 Emerson Rd Contributing 1959 611 Emerson Rd Contributing 1959 612 Emerson Rd Contributing 1959 623 Emerson Rd Contributing 1959 624 Emerson Rd Contributing 1961 636 Emerson Rd Contributing 1959 637 Emerson Rd Contributing 1960 648 Emerson Rd Contributing 1959 649 Emerson Rd Contributing 1960 Johnson Addition Conservation District: Building Index Address Classification Date Notes 654 Emerson Rd Contributing 1960 655 Emerson Rd Contributing 1960 715 Emerson Rd Contributing 1960 721 Emerson Rd Contributing 1960 733 Emerson Rd Contributing 1960 749 Emerson Rd Contributing 1958 803 Emerson Rd Contributing 1961 816 Emerson Rd Contributing 1959 817 Emerson Rd Contributing 1960 825 Emerson Rd Contributing 1958 110 Lantern Ln Contributing 1960 III Lantern Ln Contributing 1960 127 Lantern Ln Contributing 1960 128 Lantern Ln Contributing 1960 136 Lantern Ln Contributing 1960 137 Lantern Ln Contributing 1960 142 Lantern Ln Contributing 1960 145 Lantern Ln Contributing 1957 149 Lantern Ln Contributing 1960 421 W Main St Contributing 1960 431 W Main St Contributing 1959 525 W Main St Contributing 1958 605 W Main St Contributing 1958 615 W Main St Contributing 1959 441 W Main St Contributing 1952 499 W Main St Non-Contributing 1993 100 Park Ln Contributing 1959 105 Park Ln Contributing 1958 112 Park Ln Contributing 1959 125 Park Ln Contributing 1959 126 Park Ln Contributing 1959 147 Park Ln Contributing 1959 148 Park Ln Contributing 1959 10 Sherman Dr Contributing 1972 102 Sherman Dr Contributing 1961 107 Sherman Dr Contributing 1961 • • c Johnson Addition Conservation District: Building Index Address Classification Date Notes 123 Sherman Dr Contributing 1960 124 Sherman Dr Contributing 1959 141 Sherman Dr Contributing 1960 146 Sherman Dr Contributing 1959 158 Sherman Dr Contributing 1958 22 Sherman Dr Contributing 1961 43 Sherman Dr Contributing 1961 44 Sherman Dr Contributing 1961 66 Sherman Dr Contributing 1959 69 Sherman Dr Contributing 1960 7 Sherman Dr Contributing 1964 85 Sherman Dr Contributing 1960 88 Sherman Dr Contributing 1961 101 York Dr Contributing 1960 102 York Dr Contributing 1959 125 York Dr Contributing 1958 126 York Dr Contributing 1959 135 York Dr Contributing 1958 136 York Dr Contributing 1959 148 York Dr Contributing 1959 55 York Dr Contributing 1955 56 York Dr Contributing 1958 77 York Dr Contributing 1958 78 York Dr Contributing 1958 Craig, Lois From: Heck, Nancy S Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 5:25 PM To: Heck, Nancy S Cc: McFeely, Daniel P Subject: Mayor's Veto of Conservation District in Carmel Attachments: Veto Memorandum.pdf As you may or may not be aware, the Mayor vetoed Ordinance D-2193-14 earlier today. Attached please find Memorandum outlining the reasons for the Mayor's Veto of the Conservation District in the Johnson Addition Nancy S.Heck Director of Community Relations &Economic Development City of Carmel One Civic Square Carmel,IN 46032 (317) 571-2494 in Best Place to Live in America Narko. Money Magaz in You Fir,1 Tube 1 VETO MEMORANDUM I have spent a great deal of time and given much consideration to Ordinance D-2193-14 which would establish a Conservation District in the Johnson Addition in the City of Carmel. I am supportive of the arguments from both the supporters and opponents of this issue. The supporters argue that they want to ensure that affordable housing is available in Carmel and the character of their neighborhood does not change. The opponents point out that their property rights are being diminished because the ordinance would limit their ability to modify and alter their property. In determining whether I would approve the ordinance, I first looked at whether the process of establishing the Conservation District was done properly. The ordinance, in essence, amounts to inverse condemnation. If a legal challenge was filed, a court would look very carefully at whether due process was followed. Property rights are considered among the handful of basic rights protected by the Constitution of the United States and the Bill of Rights. A court is going to closely scrutinize the process to determine whether it was properly done. A property owner is entitled to due process if his or her property rights are going to be restricted. Upon examination of the process, I found that of the last six meetings of the Carmel Historical Preservation Commission,five of the meetings were not noticed to the public as required by Indiana law. The Commission appears to have met on February 13, March 13,April 17,June 12, and August 14, 2014 without publicly noticing the meetings as required by IC 5-14-1.5. On October 2,2014,the Commission met and conducted a public meeting and hearing on the proposed Conservation District. That meeting appears to have been noticed correctly under the law.There is evidence that the preservation district was discussed at every one of the 2014 Commission meetings. The Johnson Conservation District was discussed at multiple public meetings that were not noticed. This is a fatal flaw in the process and would put the City in a non-defensible position if it were sued. More importantly,transparent and open government is paramount; secret meetings cannot be countenanced. For the above reason, I veto Ordinance D-2193-14. • d/bv1A�'�. J es Brainard, Mayor ty of Carmel