HomeMy WebLinkAboutD-2208-15 Amend 8-39 Authorized Speed Hump Locations / I
SPONSOR: Councilor Sharp
ORDINANCE D-2208-15
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARMEL,INDIANA,
AMENDING CHAPTER 8,ARTICLE 4,SECTION 8-39
OF THE CARMEL CITY CODE
WHEREAS, the Common Council has established certain criteria for the approval, installation
and use of"speed humps" within the City's corporate limits, which criteria have been codified in Carmel
City Code Section 8-38; and
WHEREAS, the Common Council has established City Code Section 8-39 as its listing of those
City locations whereat the installation and use of "speed humps" has been approved in accordance with
City Code Section 8-38; and
WHEREAS, the Common Council finds that the installation and use of a "speed hump" in the
City on Milano Drive between LaBlanca Bend and Olivia Lake Drive, such location being more
particularly described on the document attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A, meets all of
the criteria set forth in City Code Section 8-38, as established by the document attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Exhibit B, and that such installation and use should therefore be approved.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Common Council of the City of Carmel,
Indiana, as follows:
Section 1. The foregoing Recitals are incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 2. The construction and use of a "speed hump" at the location identified in the Recitals is
approved.
Section 3. Chapter 8, Article 4, Section 8-39 of the Carmel City Code is thereby amended and
shall read as follows:
"Sec. 8-39. Authorized Speed Hump Locations.
The following City locations are authorized for the construction of "speed humps"
pursuant to Section 8-38 above:
a) Medalist Parkway between 122nd Street and 126th Street.
b) Emerson Road between York Drive and Sherman Drive.
c) Emerson Road between Lantern Lane and Guilford Road.
d) Sherman Drive between Emerson Road and Main (131st) Street. i.
e) Milano Drive between LaBlanca Bend and Olivia Lake Drive.
f) Reserved."
Ordinance D-2208-15
Page One of Three Pages
This Ordinance was originally prepared by Jon Oberlander, Carmel Assistant City Attorney, on 2/20/15 at 11:37 AM. It may
have been subsequently revised. However,no subsequent revision to this Ordinance has been reviewed by Mr. Oberlander for
legal sufficiency or otherwise.
[cbanswords:\jobedanderbrdinances'spccd bump\amend speed humps ch8 art+l sec8-39 fmal clean copy.docx:2/20/151
SPONSOR: Councilor Sharp
•
Section 4. Should any provision or portion of this Ordinance be declared by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid for any reason, the remaining provisions shall not be affected so long as they can,
without the invalid provision, be given the effect intended by the Common Council in adopting this
Ordinance. To this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable.
Section 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and signing
by the Mayor and such publication as is required by law.
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]
Ordinance D-2208-15
Page Two of Three Pages
This Ordinance was originally prepared by Jon Oberlander, Carmel Assistant City Attorney, on 2/20/15 at 11:37 AM. It may
have been subsequently revised. However, no subsequent revision to this Ordinance has been reviewed by Mr. Oberlander for
legal sufficiency or otherwise.
[eb:msuords:\joberlanderbrdinances\speed bump\anend speed humps 68 and sec8-39 fmal clean copy.docx:2f2W15] �..
SPONSOR: Councilor Sharp
PASSED by the Common Council of the City of Carmel,Indiana, this 02 day of nc.� ,
2015,by a vote of Lo ayes and 0 nays. JJ
COMMON COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF C 4\ dir
(2-----‘----1 ihintro.-- -."P
Presidin Offi 'Kevin D. Rider f,
U• ' 1 C.L0
Richard L. Sharp, Preside Pro Tempore Carol Schleif .
No-\ PYes-e�4-- I\A <\0>;ws^kc e---
Ronow- Carter W. Eric eidensticker /
S 57 am / Luci 'nyder
ATTEST:
L
Diana L. Cordray, IAMC, Clerk-fir asurer
Presented by me to the Mayor of the City of Carmel, Indiana this 3 day of n c-k-- ,
2015, at )0 q M.
t,� l
Diana L. Cordray, IAMC, Clerk-Treaer
Approved by me,Mayor of the City of Carmel,Indiana,this '44 day of YNTho-v,.cJk- , 2015, at
10:0- M.
K2j
J es Brainard, Mayor
ATTEST:
A ,, 4
, ,,
Diana L. Cordray, IAMC, Clerk-TreasK,er
Ordinance D-2208-15
Page Three of Three Pages
This Ordinance was originally prepared by Jon Oberlander, Carmel Assistant City Attorney, on 2/20/15 at 11:37 AM. It may I
have been subsequently revised. However, no subsequent revision to this Ordinance has been reviewed by Mr. Oberlander for
legal sufficiency or otherwise.
[eb:mswords:\joberlanderbrdinances\speed bump\amend speed humps ch8 ari4 sec8-39 final clean copy.docx:220/15]
Hamilton County Map Dever
_ .. A a :t ,
r' 4 f ter. #. x:r { i-.�....7 r q,� i _•%�_ - r +uJa y/ „y1R RRi y 11, r _. ` .sLlYY1HiLion , 4 r 9 -'''' �.,•w i
e r a * �� j , � � fi�fi'.�>..�� 3'•� [ y 44. _,%,.... 16 r .y,� ��[p, � ,�`� ; l ��'',.
Y. Y •, I! ! p., 3' , l! 11/1p ~.: t� 4 .. 1'3 .L:,� F '.r
''\ <S ,� 1 ,k.i 8" > ._' _. + y► "'F- -_ . lye:. N .g, Y. .fig *a M - - - ,, Ca
r_■ �-
try - -, „i,`' , _, . z. T_ri rY'_ 4 "tit„,,''(t `. +a,. . ..",- Ji s._ ..t. -"n+:;'"' 4S
��, .."`Ft �\ � 1 s 4 ,..�.. �' ��- tiY cs P.14 F ..�, r�, b '. -,, _.r` t k
y ,� .41 ',sst .tl r t°% s. �Y1t" `-47 an y r } ,Ii,„
w.. ly __.4:�1 7: ir„17 ,119r#t-n .3`..2' >`�xr -�,. w �v. ',,, x. . r , -_—, .t .", '.‘7,-, ',. e s a : ' :. �}� _ -_•rte �.. `{ _ _ ?,*\. i'' ' r
\ i k * ♦ ' i 4 y .'it K R.� 1 pi ` .yal „0-•'' % mss' A f 3 t f i * _ 1a . ,.? y
`, ' r. r i1 ,. a',,. r fiar: ' " ;rt ' ; � .♦„ 4'..1 e,,. s- .---V -w "� •'•=-t. %i?--•. 1. ,
: � � ! iF " yj jam' p WM 3:
p _�y�,
Flt :n 4::::: .,i r .+: d $P$ a ,�? R- ,,�-� `�, •�' 4 � ,p4; _ - ,yam
9 < , : ' s1 "-. 'i E :.r� �' , 4' maLr+. . : 4 ,� f-,::./-;'"" F \< E,, a t-, 1■t
,.• _ a}i �' ,- - c,a ..c<, .:L. Ll: . - ':- ate.-.. .-J �'•.r {�a -
Il2' ,.fir,;: . , � ,,,,,v-,,s-t,-)`-, 31;4.,,,o,t�( ::Tt i
a� a
4
G
era Y # � � - z�� e k,a ��
'"',�.►'y,��;,��� �'�` "�,'� �,.. 11'1 k_�`�.1 '• '.�l
Ec
^ ' - 17r".„ q' 4 =: iP p f� \ 1 i ,tip Y, .r :
r Y
1 �. � l $! k8l 1 .4
_ '"' qY -^cry ° _f.y t ,. Lr . ! y! �r j -II i aY am'"
• �, � T }s yyy�� e
.4.Y,NS$ `r r�sRr`' �. 1i; 'F. pS,r, Y _ _ ,� 3 •YvfS � ,.
ppp �y
.t'1k '''w x k "Frr '`1'r g - 1 ,. '• - 1 �,
t�} i s i
r =
/j
It } rJ r fi T .. ,,P Y e 1 Ai
' ` 1 3 y41 -� 9> f l 'll- -Y1 .•♦ -d 4 ) ,. ,, dt•TIi .R1 • t\ 1� .r i -i n'�`'. 1 8r�, ,!'° r.4 "�A .e. _ ? - � c. 'rt -, �r , S.' •{ �'
ew` I 'RA, ”` 1:_ _ � - 41 arr \ . ;:,, �s " .', } ", _ '_,'S�s Road k'1 - i Syr .y!•
C,; �'' +# F, 1 fa.^,,G E p;�� Xpa w� •- y a°t q
a �"�' ,i24 - 5v '� pa I:1
M x[ fi.` X11 "r' Sr .. �' i ti-' �, a r ' °�'7 ; k ..p +le ,i
n _
ware -i '' T 4 i J i tz.A w "ba,�',y, : ry .,;.— - :.,- . ,' y .- , `1-7' - 1, `' ,s. , JJ tk }}I
/j¢j � �-� .k' - ,�,, z' 1}• m � l.ra.z „ @ 9e ' °" F { .r e � '+ f J t
R:Y11 :' Y 1 7lrrs. c t
January 9, 2015 (� 1:4,200
0 0.035 0,07 0.14 mi
Parcels it.l { r .1 1 , ', 41
0 0.05 011 0.2 km
1
BaIemap nfarmdion he/3 Art&
Memorandum
To: Jeremy Kashman
From: Tiffany Boone
Date: 1/9/2015
Re:Speed Hump on Milano Drive
Please find below a summary of the analysis of the data collected in regards to the installation of a
speed hump on Milano Drive. The data collected has been analyzed against the City of Carmel
Code Section 8-38 Speed Humps. The code establishes criteria and a point system that are
detailed below for the installation of a speed hump. The information below lists the criteria with
the analysis results in bold print. A proposed speed hump installation location must be awarded a
minimum cumulative total of 25 points and otherwise meet the requirements to be recommended
for installation
A. There is a demonstrated traffic or speeding problem and alternate measures have not
sufficiently addressed the problem.
A speed hump analysis was requested by the public due to speeding and traffic concerns.
B. The location is a two-lane local or residential street.
Per the current City of Carmel Thoroughfare Plan,Milano Drive is listed as an Urban
Collector. It is not specified as a local street and would not meet this criteria.
C. It is not anticipated that the installation of the speed hump will cause the diversion of
significant amounts of traffic to another local or residential street.
At this time,the speed hump is not anticipated to divert traffic to other local and
residential streets. Therefore,it is anticipated that this criteria would be met.
D. The road slope and curvature allow for safe installation.
It is anticipated that the speed hump will be placed on a straight section of roadway
without significant grade changes. Therefore,it is anticipated that this criteria would be
met.
EXHIBIT
January 9, 2015
E. The current posted speed limit on the street where the speed hump is to be placed is no greater
than 30 m.p.h..
The current posted speed limit is 25 m.p.h.. Therefore,it is anticipated that this criteria
would be met.
F. The average daily traffic(ADT)on the street where the speed hump is to be placed is no
greater than 3,000 vehicles per day(VPD)and no less than 200 VPD.
Traffic counters were placed in the proposed area between September 30,2014 and
October 7,2014. During this time,the average daily traffic was recorded to be 1056
average vehicles per day. This meets the criteria of less than 3000 vehicles per day and
greater than 200 vehicles per day.
G. Speed humps should only be considered for installation in neighborhoods or subdivisions
where 75%or more of the homeowners in the affected neighborhood or subdivision have
indicated in writing that they are in favor of speed hump installation.
A petition signed by homeowners was provided.
The following items identify the point system and the points awarded by our analysis:
A. The number of reported vehicular accidents that have occurred during the previous 36
calendar months within 2,000 feet of the area being considered for a speed hump shall be
tabulated. The proposed location shall receive four points per reported accident per 1,000 feet
of the street segment being considered. Any accidents occurring at the intersection of an
exiting street and a major arterial or collector street shall not be considered in this point
assignment.
•
One accident was reported during this time frame in the specified area. This will
result in 3.8 points being awarded.
B. The number of public and private schools located within 2,000 feet of the area being
considered for a speed hump shall be tabulated. The proposed location shall receive three
points for each such school.
No school zones were determined in the specified area. This will result in 0 points
being awarded.
C. The number of vehicles traveling on a given day(24-hour period)through the area being
considered for a speed hump shall be tabulated. The total number of such vehicles shall
be divided by 100. The resulting number shall be the points awarded for traffic volume.
EXHIBIT 15
January 9, 2015
The total average daily traffic recorded was 1056 vehicles. This would result in 10.6
point being awarded.
D. The speed of each vehicle traveling on a given day(24-hour period)through the area
being considered for a speed hump shall be tabulated. The posted speed limit at the
proposed location shall be subtracted from the 85th percentile speed of such vehicles.
The resulting number shall be the points awarded for vehicle speed.
The posted is 25 m.p.h.. The 85th percentile speed was recorded to be 34.3 m.p.h..
This would result in 9.3 points being awarded.
E. If the area being considered for a speed hump lies within a 1,000-foot radius of a
pedestrian served facility, such as,but not limited to,a park, church, shopping center,
elderly or group housing facility,the proposed location shall receive three points for each
such facility,up to a total of six points.
The pedestrian facilities were analyzed. A development amenity area (pool house)
was located near the proposed location and 5 park/trail areas were also identified.
This results in six points being awarded.
Recommendation: From the data collected above, the proposed location does not meet the criteria
of being a local street. As stated previously, the City of Cannel Thoroughfare Plan indicates that
this street.is an Urban Collector. However, through analysis of the point system the criteria of
25.0 cumulative points are met. The proposed location receives 29.7 points through the conducted
point system analysis. With that in mind, the speed hump installation can be considered by the
City of Carmel Council for installation.
EXHIBIT B 3
SPEED HUMP WARRANT ANALYSIS
Milano Drive
Posted Speed Limit (MPH): 25
Length Of Street Segment Considered (ft): 1055
Pedestrian Facilities:
Park 0
Church 0
Shopping Center 0
Elderly or Group Housing Facility 0
Trail Head or Trail 5
Municipal Pools/Development Amenity Area 9
Other 0
Equivalent
Point System Analysis Quantity Points
Accident History: Number of accidents that have occurred 1 3.8
in the past 36 months within 2000 Ft. of the area being
considered. The proposed location shall receive four point
per reported accident per 1000 feet of the street segment
being considered.
School Zones: Number of schools located within 2000 Ft. of 0 0.0
area being considered. The proposed location shall receive 3
points for each school.
ADT: Number of vehicles in a given 24-hour period. The 1056 10.6
number of vehicles divided by 100 will be the amount of
points awarded.
85th Percentile Vehicle Speed: The difference between the 34.3 9.3
posted speed and the 85th percentile speed will be the
points awarded for the proposed location.
Pedestrian Facilities: Number of pedestrian served facilities 6 6.0
within 1000 Ft of the area being considered. The proposed
location shall receive 3 Points per area, up to a total of 6
points.
Total: 29.7
EXHIBIT 1j
Cla. Thoroughfare Plan Map I
1
A g ,(1.761.11m..m- !I
�. ' .. ..
i -
T
'
�_ . '' �
j`
N F � __. ,.....
..........s.
,5,
i. •I: .. ..• _ ,. . . 1, _• _ ,_____,.. (
. _ •
-
M ._. . _
1,4 r.. _ + i
c? - -A.- f — — Vim. _--1 *-<'Q• ,._,. .17.:, 3 .4' -''',.` l.,
fit :0 4
Iiii
1 Q i.
al
1111,: (- .. ..,2',............„...,:-.4...,.....,....ann...„-.2.-,.:_:.,_...,_,....6.::....,. ..._...............,2..• • ®a h u
EXHIBIT a_
MAP LEGEND THOROUGHFARE PLAN MAP
—IHentat, ■ Parheaj Arterial SNetintto% tail SheetluPup AASheetCdanduTrail
- 6.SJStat.Ilistmay humid halal Medal Street lureaug Propoud kcal Strut ir BM GED Cnd.bpuatedCroubg
simmainPdmarlAderialSlnei112ratm grbae[ellector Street orearn -----Coledo Strut psrAPAC Agreement praam) to Iatuthangelanloa ,p,'b , a au
MENEM PdmaryPaiwal shout lnrKul PnpaedlrbanNada:Neetpream .CoaerealeaConidon t7 Overpass Wages ,N`
®Mao Arterial Sum I,reai Coleeter Sues:oreopl p AoandalontInteneetlal(alstmp)
PuposedkrlaW Medal Swat oream Proposed lolladarSlnelpraep) ® AoandaloutIdeneda(f ropod)
on■Adedal gum paRpm ------hrhnSCegedor Slue:preom A'par
?quad Arida]Street psrPut homed Parkway Cantu Strut lersop
MaP Piepaal INLilouniftuks lrc. lalSc.,sail tibati
CAAMEL CLAY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I SI
•
Vehicle General Flow Report: MILANO DR 930
Station ID : MILANO DR 930 Last Connected Device Type: Apollo
Info Line 1 : Version Number: 1.41
Info Line 2: Serial Number: 89440
GPS Lat/Lon Number of Lanes: 1
DB File: MILANO DR 930.DB Posted Speed Limit:
; . w Lane Configuration,
# Dir. Information Vehicle Sensors Sensor Spacing Loop Length
1. Axle-Axle 4.0 ft
3. Axle-Axle 4.0 ft
I All Lanes From: 10:34-09/30/2014 To:10:04-10/07/2014 I
I Time I Volume I Avg Speed I Avg Headway I Avg Gap I Total Cars ( Total Trucks I
09/30/2014-Tue 00:00
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00 15 23.5 mph 91.5 sec 91.2 sec 15[,100,% 0 0%
11:00 59 28.2 mph 59.3 sec 59.0 sec 59(100%) 0 (0%)
12:00 54 730:7f'mp 68.8 sec 68.5 sec 54(100%) 0 (0%)
13:00 61 ` 26.7 mph 59.0 sec 58.7 sec 56 (91%) 5 (9%)
14:00 46 26.6 mph 76.2 sec 75.9 sec 45 (97%) 1 (3%)
15:00 49 302 mph 73.2 sec 72.9 sec 43 (87%) : 6 (13%)
16:00 84 30.4 mph 44.6 sec 44.3 sec 83 (98%) 1 (2%)
17:00 ,�, 4; 134 29.9 mph 26.8 sec 26.5 sec132 (98%) 2 (2%)
18:00 120 26.9 mph 30.1 sec 29.8 sec` 117 (97%) 3 (3%)
19:00 84 27.9 mph 43.0 sec 42.8 sec 82 (97%) 2 (3%)
20:00 58 28.7 mph 55.2 sec 55.0 sec 58(100%) 0 (0%)
21:00 37 29.5 mph 97.3 sec 97.1 sec 37(100%) 0 (0%)
22:00 10 28.5 mph, x`791 3 sec 3 390rirge-cl 8 (80%) 2 Ffi 20%
23:00' 0 0 0:0 sec 0.0 sec 0 (0%) 0(0%)
Daily Totals: 811 28.6 mph 54.9 sec 54.7 sec 789 (97%) 22 (3%)
Vpirlil-1 B
Centurion yen.General Flow Report Printed 10/07114 Page 1
■
i
i I
Station;MILANO DR930 Data From=1034-09/30/2014 To:10:04-la07/2014 i
Time Volume Avg Speed Avg Headway Avg Gap I Total Cars I Total Trucks I
I � I 9 P I 9 Y I 9 P
10/01/2014-Wed 00:00 4 ,ym` 31-A iiiiih 708.5 sec 708.3 sec 4;(100%) 0 (0%)
01:00 0 0 0.0 sec 0.0 sec 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
02:00 1 28.3 mph! :5321''0 sec"' +,5320T8 es 1 (100%) 0 (0%)
03:00 1 25.7 mph ` 2565 0 sec 2564:8 sec 1 (100%) 0 (0%)
04:00 2 29.8 mph 3395.5 sec 3395.2 sec 2(100%) 0 (0%)
05:00 7 28.0 mph 511.1 sec 510.9 sec 7(100%) 0 (0%)
06:00 34 27.7 mph 112.5 sec 112.2 sec 31 (91%) 3i7?. 9%0
07:00 99 28.6 mph 36.3 sec 36.1 sec 93 (93°%(93%)7.74 (7%)
08:00 89 29.3 mph 40.2 sec 39.9 sec 89(100%) 0 (0%)
09:00 58 29.4 mph 61.8 sec 61.6 sec 57 (98%) 1 (2%)
10:00 33 27.4 mph 109.3 sec 108.9 sec 33(100%) 0 (0%)
11:00 41 29.1 mph 88.3 sec 88.0 sec 40 (97%) 1 (3%)
12:00 60 28.5 mph 59.9 sec 59.7 sec 58 (96%) 2 (4%)
13:00 44 29.7 mph 80.7 sec 80.5 sec 43 (97%) 1 (3%)
14:00 50 28.0 mph 71.8 sec 71.5 sec 48 (96%) 2 (4%)
II
15:00 48 29.4 mph 74.8 sec 74.5 sec 45 (93%) 3 (7%)
16:00 103 29.6 mph 35.8 sec 35.5 sec 99 (96%) 4 (4%)
700 77T144 28.6 mph 25.1 sec 24.9 secs 142 (98%) 2 (2%)
18:00 -121 27.7 mph 29.3 sec 29.0 sec 120 (99%) 1 (1%)
19:00 90 26.7 mph 39.6 sec 39.3 sec 89 (98%) 1 (2%)
20:00 81 25.9 mph 45.5 sec 45.2 sec 80 (98%) 1 (2%)
21:00 24 27.2 mph 144.7 sec 144.4 sec 24(100%) 0 (0%)
22:00 22 26.9 mph 167.1 sec 166.9 sec 22(100%) 0 (0%)
23:00 10 27.6 mph 330.5 sec 330.3 sec 10(100%) 0 (0%)
Daily Totals: 1166 28.3 mph 73.6 sec 73.3 sec 1138 (97%) 28 (3%)
i
I Time I Volume I Avg Speed I Avg Headway I Avg Gap I Total Cars I Total Trucks I
10/02/2014-Thu 00:00 3 29.0 mph 183.3 sec 183.2 sec 3,(:100%) 0 (0%)
01:00 0 0 0.0 sec 0.0 sec 0 (0%0) 0 (0%)
02:00 0 0 0.0 sec 0.0 sec 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
03:00 2 28.5 mph? 4955 57sec;; 7 4955 3:sec 2(100%) 0 (0%)
04:00 2 31.1 mph 2449.5 sec 2449.2 sec 2(100%) 0 (0%)
05:00 11 r7`L 32 3mph 348.3 sec 348.1 sec 11 (100%) 0 (0%)
06:00 32 29'.1 mph 115.5 sec 115.2 sec 29 (90%) 37(01%).
07:00 94 28.0 mph 37.9 sec 37.6 sec 89 (94%)rte"- 5 (6%)
08:00 82 28.0 mph 42.6 sec 42.4 sec 82(100%) 0 (0%)
09:00 50 28.0 mph 74.7 sec 74.5 sec 49 (98%) 1 (2%)
10:00 30 26.1 mph 114.3 sec 113.9 sec 28 (93%) 2 (7%) 1
11:00 46 25.0 mph 82.2 sec 81.8 sec 45 (97%) 1 (3%)
12:00 38 27.7 mph 92.7 sec 92.5 sec 36 (94%) 2 (6%)
13:00 46 26.3 mph 77.4 sec 77.1 sec 46(100%) 0 (0%)
14:00 54 29.3 mph 68.7 sec 68.4 sec 51 (94%) 3 (6%)
15:00 60 27.7 mph 60.1 sec 59.8 sec 57 (95%) 3 (5%)
16:00 86 28.1 mph 41.9 sec 41.6 sec 86(100%) 0 (0%)
17 00 128 28.1 mph 28.1 sec 27.8 sec` 124 (96%) 4 (4%)
18:00 __. 98 27.3 mph 36.8 sec 36.5 sec 95 (96%) 3 (4%)
19:00 85 27.0 mph 42.1 sec 41.8 sec 83 (97%) 2 (3%) ,
20:00 56 27.8 mph 61.6 sec 61.4 sec 56(100%) 0 (0%)
21:00 49 27.2 mph 76.2 sec 75.9 sec 49(100%) 0 (0%)
22:00 14 28.8 mph 229.4 sec 229.1 sec 14(100%) 0 (0%)
23:00 2 25.7 mph 681.5 sec 681.2 sec 2(100%) 0 (0%)
Daily Totals: 1068 27.7 mph 76.2 sec 76.0 sec 1039 (97%) 29 (3%)
EXHIBIT '
Common Printed 10/07/14 Page?
. ,
I
Stake MILANO DR 930 Data From 10.34.09/302014 To:10.04-1097/2014 72014
i
I Time I Volume I Avg Speed I Avg Headway I Avg Gap I Total Cars L Total Trucks '
10/03/2014-Fri 00:00 2 24.5 mph 127.0 sec 126.9 sec 2000%0) 0 (0%)
01:00 0 0 0.0 sec 0.0 sec 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
02:00 0 0 0.0 sec 0.0 sec 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
03:00 0 0 0.0 sec 0.0 sec 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1
04:00 3 " 35 9 p" :5167 3 sec 61,671 ec 3(100%) 0 (0%)
05:00 15 30.3 mph 259.9 sec 259.7 sec 15(100%) 0 (0%) '
06:00 33 28.3 mph 115.6 sec 115.3 sec 31 (93%) 2 (7%)
07:00 92 28.8 mph 38.5 sec 38.3 sec 88 (95%)`' '}' ;TM4 (5%)
08:00 82 28.8 mph 44.1 sec 43.8 sec 81 (98%) 1 (2%)
09:00 39 29.7 mph 91.9 sec 91.6 sec 38 (97%) 1 (3%)
10:00 46 28.8 mph 79.5 sec 79.3 sec 42 (91%) 4,77(M
)
11:00 56 28.6 mph 63.8 sec 63.5 sec 54 (96%) 2 (4%) '
12:00 47 29.8 mph 73.8 sec 73.6 sec 46 (97%) 1 (3%)
13:00 40 27.8 mph 92.5 sec 92.2 sec 39 (97%) 1 (3%)
14:00 47 28.0 mph 73.5 sec 73.3 sec 44 (93%) 3 (7%)
15:00 66 28.9 mph 57.3 sec 57.1 sec 64 (96%) 2 (4%)
16:00 90 30.6 mph 38.7 sec 38.4 sec 89 (98%) 1 (2%)
17:00 , : "1'26 30.3 mph 29.0 sec 28.8 secs ' °:124 (98%) 2 (2%)
18:00 118 29.3 mph 31.1 sec 30.9 sec 117 (99%) 1 (1%)
19:00 82 28.0 mph 43.8 sec 43.5 sec 82(100%) 0 (0%)
20:00 43 28.8 mph 80.6 sec 80.4 sec 43(100%) 0 (0%) i
21:00 31 28.3 mph 114.2 sec 113.9 sec 31 (100%) 0 (0%)
22:00 30 29.6 mph 119.0 sec 118.7 sec 30(100%) 0 (0%)
23:00 19 28.6 mph 164.8 sec 164.5 sec 18 (94%) 1 (6%)
Daily Totals: 1107 29.1 mph 75.8 sec 75.6 sec 1081 (97%) 26 (3%)
I Time I Volume I Avg Speed I Avg Headway I Avg Gap I Total Cars I Total Trucks
10/04/2014-Sat 00:00 4 30.6 mph 410.5 sec 410.3 sec 4(100%) 0 (0%)
01:00 3 31.6 mph 1538.3 sec 1538.1 sec 3(100%) 0 (0%)
02:00 1 34.6 mph 1183.0 sec 1182.8 sec 1 (100%) 0 (0%)
03:00 0 0 0.0 sec 0.0 sec 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
04:00 1F--7177-7317-67-431.1777. :6208 O secs' 6207 8 sec 1 (100%) 0 (0%)
05:00 3 33.-1 mph r" 2012:7 sec 2012.5 sec 3(100%) 0 (0%)
06:00 11 31.6 mph 420.7 sec 420.5 sec 11 (100%) 0 (0%)
07:00 38 30.8 mph 89.1 sec 88.9 sec 38(100%) 0 (0%)
08:00 59 31.0 mph 63.2 sec 63.0 sec 59(100%) 0 (0%)
09:00 99 29.3 mph 36.1 sec 35.9 sec 97 (97%) 2 (3%)
10:00 101 30.3 mph 36.6 sec 36.4 sec 98 (97%) 3 (3%)
11:00 93 29.6 mph 38.3 sec 38.1 sec 90 (96%) 3 (4%)
12700 =114 29.3 mph 31.9 sec 31.6 sec` 113 (99%) 1 (1%)
13:00 68 30.4 mph 52.9 sec 52.7 sec 67 (98%) 1 (2%)
14:00 76 29.8 mph 47.2 sec 47.0 sec 76(100%) 0 (0%)
15:00 77 30.0 mph 46.8 sec 46.5 sec 77(100%) 0 (0%) i
16:00 85 30.4 mph 42.5 sec 42.2 sec 84 (98%) 1 (2%)
17:00 72 30.0 mph 50.2 sec 50.0 sec 72(100%) 0 (0%)
18:00 58 29.6 mph 61.9 sec 61.6 sec 54 (93%)r_; :.4`�';ON
19:00 52 31.0 mph 67.3 sec 67.0 sec 52(100%) 0 -(0%)
20:00 57 29.2 mph 63.4 sec 63.1 sec 55 (96%) 2 (4%)
21:00 34 28.3 mph 106.9 sec 106.6 sec 34(100%) 0 (0%)
22:00 34 30.2 mph 106.8 sec 106.5 sec 34(100%) 0 (0%)
23:00 34 30.8 mph 90.0 sec 89.8 sec 34(100%) 0 (0%)
Daily Totals: 1174 30.0 mph 72.4 sec 72.1 sec 1157 (98%) 17 (2%) ,
EXHIBIT B
Centurion Veh General Floe,Report Prated 10107/14 Page 3
.
■
Station:MILAND DR 930 Data From:10..34-09/302014 To:10.04-10/972014
1
I Time I Volume I Avg Speed I Avg Headway I Avg Gap I Total Cars I Total Trucks I
10/05/2014-Sun 00:00 10 28.3 mph 333.9 sec 333.7 sec 10L(100%4) 0 (0%)
01:00 8 29.9 mph 454.0 sec 453.8 sec 8(100%) 0 (0%)
02:00 4 26.3 mph 195.8 sec 195.5 sec 4(100%) 0 (0%)
03:00 0 0 0.0 sec 0.0 sec 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1
04:00 1 33'4 mph N.L.7845 0 Sec ",m 784,4 8 seC 1 (100%) 0 (0%)
05:00 2 h�. 23.4 mph Y 1780.0 sec 1779.8 sec 2(100%) 0 (0%)
06:00 5 27.5 mph 1122.2 sec 1122.0 sec 5(100%) 0 (0%)
07:00 14 32.2 mph 268.1 sec 267.9 sec 14(100%) 0 (0%)
08:00 27 32.4 mph 133.6 sec 133.4 sec 27(100%) 0 (0%)
09:00 64 31.3 mph 55.1 sec 54.9 sec 64(100%) 0 (0%) '
00 71 31.0 mph 51.5 sec 51.2 sec 69 (97%)777', ;72' (3%)
,11 00 186 30.3 mph 42.5 sec 42.3 secfr, '`.86(100%) '�0 (0%)
12:00 4. }- 83 30.1 mph 42.9 sec 42.6 sec 83(100%) 0 (0%)
13:00 67 30.5 mph 54.6 sec 54.3 sec 66 (98%) 1 (2%)
14:00 68 30.8 mph 52.6 sec 52.4 sec 67 (98%) 1 (2%)
15:00 76 29.1 mph 47.1 sec 46.9 sec 74 (97%) 2 (3%)
16:00 70 28.6 mph 50.9 sec 50.7 sec 68 (97%) 2 (3%)
17:00 67 29.0 mph 54.5 sec 54.2 sec 67(100%) 0 (0%)
18:00 58 28.9 mph 61.4 sec 61.2 sec 58(100%) 0 (0%)
19:00 45 28.5 mph 77.9 sec 77.6 sec 45(100%) 0 (0%)
20:00 31 28.8 mph 118.5 sec 118.3 sec 30 (96%) 1770W.
21:00 17 30.0 mph 211.2 sec 211.0 sec 17(100%) 0 (0%0)
22:00 7 28.1 mph 310.4 sec 310.2 sec 7(100%) 0 (0%)
23:00 7 30.6 mph 665.4 sec 665.2 sec 7(100%) 0 (0%)
Daily Totals: 888 29.9 mph 96.5 sec 96.3 sec 879 (98%) 9 (2%)
1
I Time I Volume I Avg Speed I Avg Headway I Avg Gap I Total Cars I Total Trucks I
10/06/2014-Mon 00:00 0 0 0.0 sec 0.0 sec 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
01:00 1 23.9 mph 0.0 sec 0.0 sec 1`(1QQ.% 0 (0%)
02:00 1c7� .345;nmph 2984.0 sec 2983.7 sec 1(100%0) 0 (0%)
03:00 0 0 0.0 sec 0.0 sec 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
04:00 1 23.6 mph 6329 0 secs 6328 8 ec 1 (100%) 0 (0%) '
05:00 6 28.8 mph 8892 sec 888.9 sec 6(100%) 0 (0%)
06:00 30 28.1 mph 130.7 sec 130.4 sec 28 (93%) 2 7(7%)
07:00 104 28.7 mph 34.4 sec 33.8 sec 100 (96%);::..._.'!:.1;14 (4%)
08:00 70 29.5 mph 50.5 sec 50.3 sec 70(100%) 0 (0%)
09:00 42 28.9 mph 87.6 sec 87.4 sec 41 (97%) 1 (3%)
10:00 38 29.9 mph 93.3 sec 93.0 sec 36 (94%) 2 (6%)
11:00 53 29.1 mph 68.3 sec 68.1 sec 52 (98%) 1 (2%)
12:00 43 . 27.7 mph 81.5 sec 81.2 sec 42 (97%) 1 (3%)
13:00 52 28.0 mph 71.9 sec 71.6 sec 50 (96%) 2 (4%)
14:00 40 28.2 mph 87.4 sec 87.1 sec 39 (97%) 1 (3%)
15:00 63 29.0 mph 58.6 sec 58.3 sec 61 (96%) 2 (4%)
16:00 69 29.8 mph 51.9 sec 51.6 sec 67 (97%) 2 (3%)
17 00 =` '131 28.8 mph 27.3 sec 27.1 sec x'-131(100%) 0 (0%)
18:00"-------- -ad 29.1 mph 41.8 sec 41.5 sec `85 (98%) 1 (2%)
19:00 70 29.1 mph 51.4 sec 51.1 sec 70(100%) 0 (0%)
20:00 45 28.8 mph 80.5 sec 80.2 sec 45(100%) 0 (0%)
21:00 21 26.9 mph 157.9 sec 157.6 sec 21 (100%) 0 (0%)
22:00 10 29.3 mph 343.8 sec 343.6 sec 10(100%) 0 (0%)
23:00 1 17.9 mph 1093.0 sec 1092.7 sec 1 (100%) 0 (0%)
Daily Totals: 977 28.8 mph 78.6 sec 78.3 sec 958 (98%) 19 (2%)
EXHIBIT
1
Contimon Vet,.General Row Rawl Printed 1097/14 Page 4
i
i
i
. `
Staeon INLANDER 930 Date From:10:34.09/302014 To:10.04-104372014
Time I Volume I Avg Speed I Avg Headway I Avg Gap I Total Cars I Total Trucks I
10/07/2014-Tue 00:00 1 23.9 mph 0.0 sec 0.0 sec 11(100%) 0 (0%)
01:00 0 0 0.0 sec 0.0 sec 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
02:00 0 0 0.0 sec 0.0 sec 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
03:00 0 0 0.0 sec 0.0 sec 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
04:00 2 28.3 mph`:, 7063 5 ec- 70533. es c 2(100%) 0 (0%)
05:00 16 31.8 mph 239.2 sec 239.0 sec 16(100%) 0 (0%)
06:00 34 29.5 mph 112.3 sec 112.0 sec 32 (94%) 2 (6%)
0700 86 29.5 mph 42.1 sec 41.8 sec`s' 80 (93%)77-77671N)
08:00 75 30.5 mph 48.1 sec 47.9 sec 75(100%) 0 (0%)
09:00 347773P;* 102.9 sec 102.6 sec 33 (97%) 1 (3%)
10:00 4 '-'23.6 rnph 90.0 sec 89.7 sec 4(100%) 0 (0%)
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00 i
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
Daily Totals:. 252 30.2 mph 130.3 sec 130.1 sec 243 (96%) 9 (4%)
i
EXH1131T
Centarnn 1/ah.General Fla vReport Panted;1007/14 Page 5 ■
e
S1aeon:MILANO OR 930 -
D&td From:10:J4 09802014 To 10:04-10fi7R014
IVehicle General Flow Report - Grand Totals
Note:ADT and Average are based on total value of all lanes printed(Together Print).
Average Daily Traffic(ADT)
Weekday Weekend Total ADT
Cars: 1040 (97%) Cars: 1018 (98%) Cars: 1034 (97%)
Trucks: 26 (3%) Trucks: 13 (2%) Trucks: 22 (3%)
Total: 1067 Total: 1031 Total: 1056
Speed Totals
50%: 29.0 mph Top Speed: 57.5 mph Average Truck Speed: 26.5 mph
85% : 34.3 mph Low Speed: 3.1 mph Average Car Speed: 29.0 mph
Avg: 29.0 mph 10mph Pace Speed: 24.4-34.3(69.2%)
Peak Hour Totals
I AM Peak Hour(Volume), AM Peak Hour(Speed)
I Weekday: 07:00-08:00 (Avg 95) 02:30-03:30 (33.9 mph)
Weekend: 10:30-11:30 (Avg 93) 03:15-04:15 (37.0 mph)
PM Peak Hour(Volume) PM Peak Hour(Speed)
Weekday 17:15-18:15 (Avg 134) 15:45-16:45 (29.9 mph)
Weekend: 12:00-13:00 (Avg 98) 22:45-23:45 (30.8 mph)
Grand Totals
Total Cars: 7284( 1034 ADT) Average Length: 10.3 ft Average Headway: 77.4 sec
Total Trucks: 159( 22 ADT) Average Axles: 2.1 Average Gap: 77.1 sec
Total Volume: 7443( 1056 ADT)
li
EXHIBIT PP
Cenlprron Veil Ganeral Row Rawl 'Fnrtic<d,10,97%14 Page 6
To: Carmel City Engineer
From: Residents of Lakes at Towne Road Homeowners Association
RE: Speed Humps on Milano Drive
The undersigned property owners from-Lakes at Towne Road,HOA request
the study of,and the installation of speed humps on Milano Drive
:'Address Street. . ::, Signature -
1 :2530 :Milano Drive a.,: ,;
ilano Drive _
'.-2 . �: 2531 . �
3 2544 ;Milano Drive lir ,. 1 f
4 2545 Milano Drive
5 2558 . Milano Drive: . .If/P'I/'.0',
6 2559 Milano Drive , -
Milano-Drive ,; 1:!'-: :: o- frO L 7. if
8 2573 Milano Drive , o A- e.d
• 9 • .;.2586 Milano= Drive _ 0: - !2- t4i,
10 2587 'Milano Drrove [ ��a ,fit ' ,:o
11 2600 Milano Drive MIIIIZWIEIIIIIIIEEEIEIIIII
M�Iano Drive
12. 2601 - r.,, - . . : ''''e..a.4.. : s 1-"1,-0.-- `
13 2614 Milano Drive _. ...3......` /) _ IT
',1,4 2615 Milano Drive . ,V i- . ..
''15 2628 Milano Drive
46- :_2629 Milano Drive.
17 2540 Wineland.Creek Drive it, ,,lam. AL
Wmeland Creek'Dnve, %: _ � '
18 254'1. _ � ._.. '
119 2554 Wmeland Creek Drive
.
20 2555 Wmeland,Creeks Drive 1 - . 26,-7-
21 2568 Wineland Creek'Drive .,.,... 0 first
Wineland Creek:Drive ii` 1 - 1'.-
22 2569 __ .. . .,. ._ .....�. �-�=-� �+a '1,
23 .2582 Wineland Creek Drive - ,
- ..- _
24
2583 Wineland Creek ve:
'Dn .
25 2596 Wineland Creek Dave. ,. _ na
26 2610 Winelan_d;Creek?Drivd `14b '��j
27 13426 Lost Creek Lane It 1 �i' 4141111P'--
1 . 04 .,. 'I
28 _13435 Lost Creek:Lane "-
29 13440 I Lost Creek.Lane r ,�,.
30 13449 . Lost Creek Lane l� ,..,�. y : -1-10.1
3.1 13454 Lost.Creek Lane sl ,,
32. 13463 Lost Creek Lane . t t. , ,
33 13468 Lost Creek Lane ' ,A jF .f. ' : l�.D'IP
:34 13482 Lost Creek Lane - : ..:, . HI IT E.
To: Carmel City Engineer
From: Residents of Lakes at Towne Road Homeowners Association
RE: Speed Humps on Milano Drive
The undersigned property owners from Lakes at Towne Road HOA request
the study. of and the installation of speed humps on Milano Drive
35 2525 Diamond Lake Drive
36 2539 Diamond.Lake Drive
37 2542 Diamond Lake Drive ° •
38 2553 Diamond Lake Drive aiW
39 2556 Diamond Lake Drive r --
40 2567 Diamond Lake Drive
4'1 2570 Diamond.Lake Drive
42 2581 Diamond Lake Drive
43 2584 Diamond Lake Drive
44 13381 Rock Creek Drive Am. i ";: 7-r /4
45 13390 Rock Creek Drive ' --;s
ieht21111.111111
46 13395 Rock Creek Drive P `"
47 13429
Rock CreekOrive:
48 13438 Rock Creek Drive
rn
49 13443 Rock Creek,Drive
Rock Creek Drive
50 13452
-�- 1 3457 Rock Creek Drive
13466 Rock Creek Drive: ' 3 _'....,i!!''
53 13471 Rock Creek Drive liffirial ►
54 13485 Rock Creek Drive ffilMer-offinoY42.., y.
1