Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Minutes BZA 01-22-01
Lakes atHazelDellSubdiviison, Section1, Common Area3 (SUA-88- I1. 00) Withdrawn bypetitioner, whomayreturnin90days. ParkwoodCrossing, Building 1 – Verizon Wireless (V-222-00) 2i. Petitionerseeks aDevelopmental standards VarianceofSection 25.7.02- 10(b): Number & Typeinorder toestablish asignonafaçade thatdoes thnotfrontapublicright-of-way. Thesiteislocated at250East96 Street. ThesiteiszonedB-6/business. FiledbySteveGrannerofBoseMcKinney & EvansforVerizonWireless. thSteveGranner, landuseconsultantwithBoseMcKinney & Evans, 600East96 Street, andJohn Smeltzer, attorney wereinattendance. TheMorganStanley DeanWitter sign thwasapprovedJanuary8 2001forBuilding 7. Sincethattime, therehas beenachange in nameand “DeanWitter” hasbeen eliminated. Color renderings ofthe signwere submitted—thesign meetstheOrdinance butisadditionalsignage. Thecommitment for building 7states nosignsonthesouthand eastfaçadesofthe building. TheMorgan Stanleybuilding #7andthe4.3+ acres arounditareownedbyDukeHawk LLC. PointofOrder TheChairmanquestioned whether ornottheBoard couldhearthis petitionunderoldbusiness, sincethe MorganStanley DeanWitter sign isnot specifically listedontheAgendaforthis evening. John Molitorassured the Boardthatitwasproper tohearthisitematthistime. TheVerizon signisproposed forbuilding one (thereused tobeaGTE signonthenorth façadeofthebuilding priortothe existence ofbuildingseven). TheGTE signwas removedwhentheirnamechanged toVerizon. Verizonwants toerect anewsignVerizon Wireless, butwiththe construction ofbuilding sevenbetweenthemand theinterstate, desirestoerectthesign onthe west side, whichrequires avariance. Mr. Grannerreferred topacketsprovided for eachboard member, anddescribed theproposed letteringof33 ½ inches. Aftermeeting withMr. Lilliglast week, thiswasrevised to32inches. The revisedplanreflects thereductioninsizetocomply withordinancechartrequirements. WehavebeenforADLS approval forthelargersign. Twoissueswereraisedatthe last meeting. Oneconcerns thelighting, theotherconcerning whatwould bepermittedonthe restofthebuilding. BeckyFields, PropertyManagerfor theDukesbuilding atParkwood Crossing, ispresent toanswer questions. Aletterdated 1/15/01isincluded describingtherecentdirective for lighting inthe buildings. Dukecontracts asecurityservicefor theParkwood Crossing parkinglot. The securityofficers onlyhave accesstothe lobbyandnot thefloorsabove. Personswhoworklakesometimes leave thelights onwhen theyleave forthe evening. Thesecondissue isadditional signageonbuildings1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and6; building 7isowned byDukeHawkLLC. Indiana Insuranceownstheir ownproperty, and alloftheirsignage S:\\BoardofZoningAppeals\\Minutes\\2001\\bzajan22 9