HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Carmel Docket 11020013 DP ADLS 11090002 SP 11020013 DP ADLS & 11030006 ZW Woodland Terrace CCRC Full Site Approval.msgGod afternoon Mr. Justus,
I have reviewed the latest submittal and met with EMH&T on August 1 to discuss this project.
Based on the response and the discussion with EMH&T on August 1, Comments 5, 17, 19, 25, 27, 41, 45 have been satisfactorily addressed.
Comment 43. As discussed with EMH&T, approval from the BPW will be required in the event that an open cut of 136th Street is required for the installation of the gas service.
Comment 52. Due to the proposed pervious pavement, it appears that the southern area does not have specific areas where water will pond in the clogged condition (if the pavers are clogged,
runoff will continue to flow to the south) and that the “spillway” of the southern area is the top of the proposed wall along the southern property line at an elevation of 839.13 and
will not govern the MLAG/MFPG of the main building. This comment has been satisfactorily addressed.
Comment 62. As discussed with EMH&T, the response to Comment 17 is how the response to this comment was to have read. This comment has been satisfactorily addressed.
Comment 63. As discussed with EMH&T, a variance is needed to resolve Comment 63. The July 10, 2014 letter from Justus acknowledging the condition will be attached to the variance request
letter.
Additional Comment 1. As discussed with EMH&T, a variance from this requirement is required. The July 10, 2014 letter from Justus acknowledging the condition will be attached to the
variance request letter.
Additional Comment 2. This comment has been satisfactorily addressed.
Additional Comment 3. As discussed with EMH&T on August 1, please add the MLAG/MFPG definitions to the plan set. Please ensure these revisions are made on the final sets submitted for
approval.
As discussed at the August 1 meeting with EMH&T, the spot elevations around the main building need to be revised to reflect the MLAG, not the elevations noted. Please ensure these revisions
are made on the final sets submitted for approval
As discussed with EMH&T on August 1, a variance from Section 104.02 is required for not providing a FFE 6-inches above the MLAG.
I have no further technical comments for this project. Please continue to work on resolving any outstanding drainage and SWPPP comments.
I have reviewed the estimate for compliance with the Thoroughfare Plan and the unit costs are acceptable. I have no further comments concerning the value of the Thoroughfare Plan commitment.
Thanks so much,
Gary
Gary R. Duncan, Jr., PE
Assistant City Engineer
City of Carmel
Department of Engineering
One Civic Square
Carmel, IN 46032
(317) 571-2441
(317) 571-2439 (fax)
gduncan@carmel.in.gov
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail