HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket Atapco
Carmel Lakeside Retail
Docket Number 16030005 V
VARIANCE
CITY OF CARMEL, INDIANA
March 28, 2016
Board of Zoning Appeals – Hearing Officer
Applicant: Atapco Carmel, Inc.
Attorneys – Nelson & Frankenberger, P.C.
Attn: James E. Shinaver, Attorney
844-0106
Attn: Jon C. Dobosiewicz
Professional Land Planner
844-0106
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Explanation of Request
2. Variance Site Location Map / Aerial Photograph
3. Approved Development Plan
4. Proposed Development Plan Alternate
(exhibit illustrates outdoor seating on east and west sides of building)
5. Variance Ballot Sheet
6. Findings of Fact
TAB 1
TAB 2
SITE
NORTH
Carmel Lakeside Retail
Variance Location Map / Aerial Photograph
Carmel Drive
Gu
i
l
f
o
r
d
R
o
a
d
TAB 3
Bollards (5)
OUTDOOR
SEATING
TAB 4
PL
O
T
D
A
T
E
:
3/
1
5
/
2
0
1
6
1
0
:
1
4
A
M
PL
O
T
S
C
A
L
E
:
1:
1
ED
I
T
D
A
T
E
:
3/
1
5
/
2
0
1
6
ED
I
T
E
D
B
Y
:
PD
O
T
T
E
R
Y
DR
A
W
I
N
G
F
I
L
E
:
P:
\
2
0
1
2
\
0
0
5
9
0
\
D
.
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
i
v
i
l
\
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
s
\
2
0
1
6
-
0
3
-
1
5
-
R
e
t
a
i
l
S
i
t
e
B
a
s
e
M
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
\
2
0
1
2
.
0
0
5
9
0
.
R
E
T
A
I
L
.
C
E
.
X
R
E
F
.
S
I
T
E
B
A
S
E
.
d
w
g
Project Number
CERTIFIED BY
ISSUANCE INDEX
DATE:
PROJECT PHASE:
REVISION SCHEDULE
NO.DESCRIPTION DATE
03/15/2016
----
2014.01381
CARMEL LAKESIDE
RETAIL
W. Carmel Drive and
S. Guilford Road
Carmel, Indiana
7260 Shadeland Station | Indianapolis, Indiana 46256
TEL 317.547.5580 | FAX 317.543.0270
www.structurepoint.com
1
SITE PLAN
Project Number
CERTIFIED BY
ISSUANCE INDEX
DATE:
PROJECT PHASE:
REVISION SCHEDULE
NO.DESCRIPTION DATE
03/15/2016
----
2014.01381
CARMEL LAKESIDE
RETAIL
W. Carmel Drive and
S. Guilford Road
Carmel, Indiana
7260 Shadeland Station | Indianapolis, Indiana 46256
TEL 317.547.5580 | FAX 317.543.0270
www.structurepoint.com
TAB 5
Atapco DSV Application 030416
*The applicant will provide individual ballot sheets for all requested variances at the BZA meeting.
CARMEL ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
Carmel, Indiana
Docket No.: 16030005 V – Atapco PUD Section 6.2.A: 60’ Maximum Front Yard Setback, 70’ requested.
Petitioner: Atapco Carmel, Inc.
FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet)
1. __________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
2. _________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
3. _________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
DATED THIS ____ DAY OF ____________, 2016.
__________________________________________________
Board Member
TAB 6
FOF
CARMEL ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
CARMEL, INDIANA
Docket No.: 16030005 V – Atapco PUD Section 6.2.A: 60’ Maximum Front Yard Setback, 70’ requested.
Petitioner: Atapco Carmel, Inc.
FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE
1. The approval of the requested variances will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals
and general welfare of the community because:
The approval of the requested variances will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals
and general welfare of the community because the proposed site and development plan for the real
estate, while taking into account the site constraints, is adequately designed and appropriately
planned so that the approval of the variances will not have a negative impact to the public health,
safety, morals and general welfare of the community.
2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected
in a substantially adverse manner because:
The use and value of the area adjacent to the real estate that is the subject of the requested
variances will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because the proposed site and
development plan for the real estate, while taking into account the site constraints, is adequately
designed and appropriately planned.
3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical
difficulties in the use of the property because:
Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance results in practical difficulties in the use of the
Applicant’s site because various site constraints prevent the Applicant from complying with the
certain provisions of the Zoning Ordinance and a strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would
prevents the Applicant from properly developing the site for the proposed use.
DECISION
IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals Hearing Officer that
Development Standards Variance Docket No. 16030005 V is granted, subject to any conditions stated in
the minutes of this meeting, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof.
Adopted this 28th day of March, 2016.
_________________________________________
HEARING OFFICER, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals
_________________________________________
SECRETARY, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals
Conditions of the Board are listed on the back. (Petitioner or his representative to sign).