The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1311.02 CorrespondenceVillage of West Clay, Hellen Wel1s Buildii�g (Coi�structian Plans) The site is located at the sout�east corner of 131" Street and Towne Road wit�7in the Vilfage of West Clay. The site is zoned PUDIPIanned Unit Developinent. Filed by Dave Sexton of the Schneider Corporation fo�� Brenwick TND Communities. Dave Sexton with Schneider Coiporatian and Keith Lash from Bz�enwick �re �resent for the TAC review on the Hellen Weils Builc�in�. It's a proposed two-story structure in the Village of W�st Clay. The placement is jus[ south of the center of town. Ti1e two-story structure sits on one of the improved lots/blocks. We are not proposing any additional extensions of sewer mains, water mains, or storm sewe��s. Those will be up to the sewer lateral water tap. Steve sent a letter. Na additional access. No fu��ther comrzients. .Tenny No comments. This is already approved. Chuck, it is detexmined that you want gas for this building. In t�e front there is a 5' �tility. We will bring gas in up the back. On the plans it did not detail a drainage utility easement. There is no inain along Meeting Hause Raad. We have one on the narth ai�d one on the south side. 5ame af the other utilities have been coming up the alley. Keith Lash, it wouid be beneficial if the Vectren main were along Meeting Hause Road for future connections. If the main were in tile front, we cauld do a tap-in siirailar to the Miller building across the street as well as the State Farm Bui[ding. Chuck, anythirag built to ti�e north will hopefully get extended in that direc�ion. We will need to get together to discuss this further. The load requirements sheet is handed to Keith. Gi�e Jerry a call if you have any questions. Dick, this is outside Carmel engineering jurisdiction. Scott does not have a landscape plan. As you plan a31 buildirag more properties such as this, will you have tree pits in the front? You show an open area that shows an existing tree. Do you want to save the tree? Keith, similar to the Miller building, we will build the tree pit around it. Scott would like an opportuniry to make comments on the construction. You will not get anythinb to grow there unless you do it proper[y. You will be replacing trees every two years. Scott will pzovide Dave with co�nments and information on constructio�l. John South, I recommend a silt fence across the fi-ont. S:Technic�lAdvisoryCommitteelMinu[esltac2UU20ctaber � � Gary sent Dave a letter. No plans to sprinkle the building. There is no base�nent. T�e second story will be ail office. If tl�e second flaor is over 1500 SF, it has to be sprinkled. When I calculate the square Footage, I come up with over 2000. There are some options if you do nat spz-inkle. 1VIy last comment is we request a Knox box for �mergency access. If it does turn out to be sprinkled, we would request a set of Knox PC caps. I will provide an application. Bill has given addresses. I will send a letter so you can get a pern�it. Do you know haw many tenant spaces there are a�ailable in the building? It is noted anly one tenant will have an office ii� the building. The tenant is Hellen Wells. Also, I ain passing on to yau a new letter from the post office. You inay contact the individual on the letter if you have any questions. Jon, did we go through the Secondary Platting on the State Farm and the Dentist Office? Keith noted they are permitted metes and bounds according to the ordinance. It is ail similar. What will be to the south of this buildirag? Keith explains it will be a future driveway into Black E. After looking at the proposed sanitary lateral location, it looks like the manhole sits outside the existing easement. If that is a proposed easement, we will need a separate easerz�ez�t ta get over the mant�ole. Will you record a blanket easement for that? Will it include access over the inanhole? �nce you get other TAC cotnments resolved, and those other issues, we wijl then he in a position to issue building permits. Dave, after aur f�nal set of architectural plans, we will �erify the location. Z�eith, it �vill be paz�t o£ t11e o�rerall pail�ing lot. The Villas at Sweet Charity Farms (Primary P�at) The applicant seeks approval to plat a 52-lot residential subdivision on 3451 acres. The site rts located on the south side of 14151 Street 118 znile east af Towne Road. The site is zoned S- 1/Residence - Estate. Filed by Rich Kelly of EMH&T for Justus Ho�ne Builders, lnc. Chris White represents Justus Hoznes who is the developer and builder of the The Villas at Sweet Charity Farrns. Rich Kelly filed the application for .Tustus Home Builders, Inc. The site is located on the south side of 14is` SEreet and east of Towne Road. It is presently owned partly by Nancy Irsay and the Browns own the western haif of the site. There are two existing property owners of which the house in tile northwest corner will be carved out of this parcel and wiil reinain. We are propasing 52 lots that are approximately 80 x 120 in size utiiizing the open space ordinance. This will be 52 lots on 34'/z acres. Our entrance wilI line up with the new entr•ance recently installed by Sadcile Creek to the north. We da have a legal drain that cuts through the site which is the reason, partly, for the location of the ponds. Sanitary sewer will be extend�d from Saddle Creek to the north to ouz� site. We ha�e worked otit easements with Platinum Proper�ies who is developing tha� subdivision. This will come from 146`�' Street to our site. There is existing water at 1415i Street and is the City af Carmel water. There will be na clubhouse or amenity within the subdivision. We will have walking paths throughout the community along with a gazebo. The landscape plans ha�e already been submitted for review. S:Techi�ic�lAdvisoryCommilteelMiimteslluc20fl?Octaber 1 � Steve Broe��mann, Hamilton County Highway sent a letter to Rich. Chris questions Steve about the widening to the south side f��om the west line clear aver to the east that would be off the propei•ty. Steve, that is co��rect. We would like to see you complete this. Saddle Creek has done their entire site. This would be a 24' wide street acro5s the whole thing. We would like to see you asphalt acrass the entire area. You can ad{ust the striping where it needs to be done at the entrance. Also, ADA now requires inore stringent guidelines. At inCersections they are lfloking for curb depressions ii� each direction. The ADA guidelines are on the Federal Highway website. We expecC to see all this incorporated. It mostiy pertains to the ramps. They must be cancrete. We can sit down and further review these requirements. Chris, we can do a proper frontage. We don't feel your widening idea will be acceptable to this developer. Also, is 146`�' Street siinilar to 13151 Street? It is a collectar street per Jon. The thoroughfare plan calls fo�� it to be a four-lane roadway. This will be completed similar to Aberdeen Bend. Jon I would like ta see you work out a plan with the County Hignway Department an what they want to see farCher east. I do not see that you need to go above and beyond what is required on the thoroughfare plan. We would like this to be satisfactory to the highway department as far as the level of improvement. Then you can say the develo�er will make "x" impro�ement along the frontage. What we would like to see at the entrance is opposing lots on 141s` Street as opposed to decel lanes and exit inta the site. Sieve, this will fit in. It is just a matter of restriping approximately 2' more pavement. The oz•dinance cal�s for a 45' half. The right-of-way exists all the way to Saddle Creek. When they caine up with the Special Use approval for horse barns they dedicated additional right-of-way. Saddle Ci'eek added 3' ancl that would gi�e us 24'. All poles are the on narth side af street. It would not be a matter of moving the poles. It would just in�olve adding some pipes. Jon, I do not have a preference or the ability to ask you to go above and beyond what the ordinance requires. It wouid be a negotiation between the developer and the caunty highway department. Jenny sent a letter. We compieted a field investfgation of the offsite portions of the regulated drain. The inspector has included his requests as far as the clearing and the dredging of the drain Rich, we understand we need to clear the drain all the way to 146`�' Street. It is z�egulated all the way so thej�e are no issues with that, We will clear the trees along banks, remove smaller trees, and brush. It is understood you would like to see the flaw line reestablished. We wiil fallow up on the documentation relative to the legal clrain and nonenforceinent. As we get through the Primary Plat plan and get to the construction plans, let's sit down and discuss this more in detail. S:TcchniculAdvisoiyCommitteeVVlinutesltac2002Qctober 12 SENT B�: ; 317 B23 9237; N�V-4-02 11:09AM; PAGE 11� ��I��.�`�� t��P�� 1-2c�� r� C��c��f �Sf � u c�n rY] , � -� �� , t�; �� z �c�l -e � �� ; �� J�� L C.�S �C-�� '7 � -- �-� C� � � C�� i �� _� � 7�5� �e�-�' : �� 3 - �a �'� , ...__..—_��_--...�__. �� r , � _.�_...� �� ,�3� �5 �� _� � �_�._ �1 P�, �'c,` G�.. PG � �. �� ,� ,, � .. , �� %�'l fc� +� .: 7 �i e� S u�� '� r� � , .,� IS' .5 /aP.v S• � t�.n �.� � I S� - � +.� �� J �r.��;� � sv l� �� r .� � ��'��-�� ...__,f___�.QG . � � sf PL � ;:%�G�rrr ��x G� �G� �. �� .,. � r� C,�'i P f . � _�_ ri ---_ -�----�--- . �, �`... . _ .- C f .�_....__ __ . . _...... _ 1 � t�.., � - - �4::� �✓ : 4.. �r'. ; . , 7 I�C�c.lr �'� ir.�� c � � �� t SEN� SY: ; sir �� ca�; y�v Y �� II.VQryIVI� nU� �, Az'lcenau Landscaping, �ic. I 17�4 Old Stone Dri�e Lndianapolis, Ind4ana 4b236 1i Name ! Address Hclien welis agencti� S.If1�i. T-lOmes � —�� Descriptior� � Landscape Pro�osal Prepping, Haul Dc:bris, Cleanup, Finish Qsade 9ingle ax top soil Prcrnergeant �vc.ed conU'ol per �un Muich, per squ�r� ;�ard � peli�ery Fee of h4ulch � Soddirtg per sc�uare y�rd 15' Bvxwood FvergreeFti Shru6 Greea �ent 18-2A' T�ensie Y.'w ['reg. Vibumurn � gal. E Se�dur�� autnm joy I ga{. 1 Gal. Black Eycd 5usa�i Perei3nial i 1 Gal. 5tc13aciora� Day Lill}• Perennial �; l�cfivery ai sod � i � - - _ —. ESt� m ate Date Estirnate # � ]114/2UO2 244 Praje — ---_— —_ —�-I -- �. � —� Qty ..�Rafe — Tatal � l 550.(}0 , azs.oa ' � '� 23.UU 8 49.(}4 � 1 45.00 270 3.35 g 45.40 5 : 46.00 5 as.00 7 I [.40 i '7 ; 11 _00 7 ' 11.00 j 50.00 ! , I I _�1_ .__.___ - ---�. Totaf ot _ i ,� . � SSO,U9 �7 �,Sr 2as.ao 23.QQ 392A0 ; 45.OU ':. � 904.50 w�05 225.00 i 234.f�U � 22s.oa 77.00 77.{i(7 77.�d SO.QU �3,100.5(J Dept. of Commun��y Services -- Building & Code Enforcement (317-571-Z444) This permit has been calculated under the Fee 4rdinance of the C�ty of Carme!/Cfay Township �Ord�nance Z-3�1). Base inspections are included in the Fee calculation. NOTE� Additionai Inspections wil� require additiona� f ees to be pai d by Fi nal Inspecti on. s/permits/policies/handa�t for commercial inspectians M�rch 2002 �ct 09 03 09:3Ba CRMEROh ��ECTRIC IHC. 5473478 p.l i�`.��eur F�. 9ir�e. 1773 N. F7iAl�1M ROAD LA4�I�IfI�,1Np1�1lR �62Tb R1i0l� 3+{7•�3+174 P �X 'l�iilN5?Q�"T21L Z'0: .7im Oaks /City Of Carme� �� Rich Beckom �: iol9la3 RE: Panels And Pane3.s Cove�s � � .� � �. %� �Z Please Find Attched I.etter From Cutler Hammer Goncerning Pan,els,�� panel Cvvers .IOB : Steven: M. Hass BuiZders l�elen We1� Agency I272i Meeting }iouse Road Please Be 1�,dvzsed Panel Cover RepXacements Have Been Orctered �y Questions P�ease Feel Free Ta Call Me 547-5474 '!'OrAI. P11G�S .� 5incereZy �� G�. , Richard A. Beckom President OCIEt F�x � 54i13478 Oc•�- 09 03 09:37a CRMEROM ELECTRIC IMC. 5473478 p.2 }0- 8-03;10:27AN,;EATDN CUTLER HAMMER CAkI�RON �LEC, ;3t7 9t3 5348 � 2i � !�1 Cuiler ;Hammer 1`iil Westingl�ot€se a Catle�Hammer PraNc15 CUn�R-ttauin�R n�c. �s�� 592o Castleway Wes1 Dr�ve SU�t6 2tQ Ind�anap45s.in 4925a . FAX TRANSMITTAL TO; Rich Beckam — Cameron Electric FROM; Rob Haynes - indianapof�s affice PH�NE: (317j 913-5376 FAX: {3'i7'� 913-5►348 nAZE: 7418103 'r��€: 10:28 AM PAG�5. wCLuoINQ 7H1S SH�1': � SUBJECT: Loadcen#ers 8. Warranty Rich, The Cutler-Hammer Load�enters are buil# as components w�th mar�y loadceniers using identical parts and componesrts. The two loadcenters in question, BR4040B2[i� and 3BR3042B200 both use the exact same box which we classify as a L1. The interivrs and �rims are different though. By putting a 3BR3042B2�U in a box that orig�nal�y had a BR4Q4482�0 you have not altered our design in any way and the loadcenter is put togeth�r t�te same as the way as when we have it iested by U! and NEMA. Since you are using th� exac� same box as the 3BR3042B200 is dcsigned for, �he UL label and #ufi warranties remain intact. Call me 'rf yvu have any ques�ivns. Than�c You, Rob Haynes Sale� Engineer