Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTAC Correspondence Cityof C David Sexton November 22, 1993 Schneider Engineering 3020 North Post Road Indpls., IN 46226-6518 Re: Brookfield/Bayhill - Primary Plat - Preliminary review Dear David, Upon review of your submitted materials, I have found the following items will need to (1/4# be addressed: • Support items yStatement from the City Street Department and the City Engineer's office regarding the impact of the development on the surrounding roadway system and recommended improvements for each adjoining street and entrance point firm scale of overall plat on sheet S-1 eitt ovenants and restrictions for.this development -none submitted - please be sure the following items are addressed - dusk to dawn yard lights to be installed on each lot by the builder/developer per 7.1.7 of the Cluster ordinance. - specific sections on the maintenance and replacement of material in the common areas F' - a restriction on fencing along major thoroughfares and in common areas 1Still awaiting submittal of traffic impact study, upon submittal will review and forward compants 1.4 soils report needs to be submitted to go with the soils map included in the submittal e-Please submit support documents required by the Subdivision Regulations - i.e. report on utilities, drainage and Comp. Plan r.-A statement from Carmel Sewer and Water Utility needs to be submitted confirming adequate capacity a---Correspondence from the TAC members needs to be submitted upon receipt, as of the date of this letter no correspondence has been received. Landscape plan - has been reviewed by Mike Hollibaugh of our office, preliminary review, indicates the following: - If this is a cluster, where is the open space? This lack of open space is a serious design flaw. This plan needs to go back to the drawing board. - In order to design a more complete buffer, it is recommended that additional plant material be added to the greenbelt buffer of lots 69 through 73, which back up to 126th Street. ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL,INDIANA 46032 317;571-2400 Page 2 Brookfield Nov. 22, 1993 - The protection/utilization of existing trees on this site appears have been given little consideration with this proposal. Residential Development Objective #1, in the 1991 Comprehensive Plan, states that, "wherever possible, natural amenities such as greenbelts, trees stands, creeks, and drainage courses should be accessible and visible to the public from public right's-of-way and roadways...."(p80). Explain how this Objective has been addressed in this proposal.. - Provide Department with copy of wetland delineation report and approval letters from Army Corps and IDEM for encroachment or filling of wetlands on this project site. p Signage plan - please dimension proposed signage - to confirm compliance with the sign ordinance - where will the signage be place, at what entrances? Will there internal directional, phasing or predevelopment signs for this project? Primary Plat -, treet and Subdivision names will need to receive approval from the Carmel\Clay Communications Center - Jerry Lowe t,-Please include a stub street to the south property - for the development of the long narrow tract owned by American Aggregates, which is already stubbed from the south from Lake Forest, this will allow for the development of that parcel with a minimum length cul-de-sac and additional stub to the east and eventually to Hazeldell Road. This stub could be accomplished with minimum disturbance by moving lots 91, 90 & 89 to the west and placing the stub across from Windbush Way. 47,Please contact the City Engineer's office regarding the entrance configuration of island and street design. They will need the Board of Public Works and Safety approval as shown. ‘X'urrently, the accel/decel lanes have been shown at the entrance, please dimension so compliance as to length can be shown per the regulations. f,Oocation, size and capacity of storm sewer, water system and sanitary sewer will need to be reviewed by the appropriate Departments, County Surveyor, SCS & City Engineer for drainage, sanitary and water. r-Non-access easements need to be added along perimeter of project that abuts public right sof=ways. man I have a Certification statement from the design engineer stating that sections 6.3.155-6.3.16, 6.3.17 & 6.3.18 will be met in the design of this project? ,,,---Please dimension right-of-ways throughout and around the development to show conformance with the Comprehensive plan for ROW dedication. Currently, no road improvements are shown to the perimeter thoroughfares - are we awaiting traffic impact study for recommendations, or are no improvements planned age easements will need to be added along the back of lot 83. -+Monuments, markers and benchmark need to be added to the plat Page 3 Brookfield Nov. 22, 1993 If you have any questions to the above comments or the process before you, feel free to contact me at (317) 571-2444, at your convenience. Sincerely ,i/ /---------- David D. C/ ingham, AICP Assistant / rector Department of Community Development City of Carmel, Indiana DDC cc: George Sweet, 9502 Angola Court, Indpls., IN 46268 Plan Commission File DDC file Mike Hollibaugh DOCD Staff file Page 3 Brookfield Nov. 22, 1993 VPrepare a break down of overall acreage/common area/flood plain/and surrounding developments density be completed and included for the file? 'The area to the west of lot 89 needs to be labeled as common area or its proposed use indicated *Does the greenbelt easement continue in front lots 83 thru 88? Supportive materials - per Cluster ordinance • - Please refer to section 7.1.3 of the cluster ordinance and be prepared to address the following,items at the Plan Commission; to location and style of building units - e general architectural ffie exterior building materials /treatment of the greenbelt buffers and other open spaces to lighting, landscaping, and signage liVilunber of and location of all parking spaces . oposed restrictive covenants /means of adequately maintaining all common areas Public Notice of the date of this letter, I have not received any of the Public Notice information required by the ordinance. Filing Fee A $1070.00 + $100.00 for each requested variance of the Subdivision Regulations will need to be submitted. The above comments will need to be addressed and updated plans need to be submitted no later than December 10, 1993, to assure our office adequate time to review your proposed project. • I have tenantively scheduled you for a preliminary review of the Primary Plat by TAC at the December 22, 1993 TAC meeting. I will tenantively schedule you for the Jan. 18, 1994 Plan Commission meeting. NELSON & FRANKENBERGER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW 3021 EAST 98TH STREET JAMES J. NELSON SUITE 220 CHARLES D. FRANKENBERGER INDIANAPOLIS ,INDIANA 46280 JANET WOLF SWISS 317-844-0106 JANEOF COUNSEL FAX 317-846-8782 B MERRILL December 1, 1993 Mr. Dave Cunningham Department of Community Development One Civic Square Carmel, Indiana 46032 Re: Brenwick Development Company, Inc./Residential Community/126th Street Dear Dave: Enclosed is a copy of the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for the Proposed Residential Community to be located on 126th Street, Carmel, Indiana, and to be developed by Brenwick Development Company, Inc. Following your review, should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Kindest regards, bk LSON & FRANKENBERGER li.— Nelson Ja► n JJN/bg Enclosure • John V.Schneider, P.E., L.S. Gary R.Kent,L.S. President Edward D.Giacoletti,L.S. James M. Mulryan,L.S. Stephen M. Cooper,L.S. Richard G.Rayback,L.S. Vice President Paul C.Claire,P.E. Duane A. Sharrer,P.E. Nancy Rumschlag Wesley L.Day,L.S. Controller-Treasurer Richard A.Henderson,P.E. James C. Hart,P.E. SCHNEIDER ENGINEERING CORPORATION Evan J. Evans,L.S. Vincent J.Schneider, P.E., L.S. Professional Engineers -Land Surveyors-Land Planners-Geologists J.Cort Crosby,P.E. 1917-1990 Fred I.Krebs,P.E. Dannie L.Smith,P.E. December 10, 1993 Thomas A.Kallio,C.P.G. 4 Dave Cunningham Department of Community Development Ot • One Civic Square �,Dow Carmel, IN 46032 RE: BAYHILL & BROOKFIELD AT WATERSTONE 8 KO PRIMARY PLAT - CLUSTER Dear Dave, Please find enclosed two sets of the Primary Plat for Bayhill & Brookfield at Waterstone amended per your comment letter dated November 22, 1993. So that you may follow along more easily, I have numbered each of your remarks (copy attached) and have responded appropriately. 1. A copy of the Primary Plat was forwarded to Dave Klingensmith of the City Street Department and to Randy Powell of the City Engineer's Office on November 15, 1993. A copy of each letter is included in the enclosed Application booklet for your reference.As of this date I have not received from either any comments regarding the entry or surrounding streets.Also included in the Application booklet is a copy of a follow up letter to Mr. Klingensmith and Mr. Powell requesting a response. 2. The scale as originally shown on sheet S-1 is correct, 1"=200'. 3. A copy of the covenants and restrictions will be supplied to you by the developer and will address dusk to dawn lights, maintenance of common areas and fencing. 4. Copies of the Traffic Impact Study, by A & F Engineering is also included in this package, for your review. 5. A soils map and support material is included within the Application booklet. 6. Included in the Application booklet are support documents required by the Subdivision Regulations including, a report on utilities, drainage and the Comprehensive Plan. INDIANAPOLIS: AVON: 3020 North Post Road,Indianapolis,Indiana 46226-6518 6845 East U.S.36,Suite 500 P.O.Box 26068,Indianapolis,Indiana 46226-0068 Danville,Indiana 46122 TEL:(317)898-8282 TEL:(317)272-0108 FAX: (317)899-8010 7-, FAX:(317)272-0412 recycled paper Dave Cunningham December 10, 1993 Page 2 of 4 7. A copy of the Primary Plat was forwarded to Jim Dougherty of the City Utilities Office and to Randy Powell of the City Engineer's Office on November 15, 1993. A copy of each letter is included in the enclosed Application booklet for your reference.As of this date I have not received from either any comments regarding adequate sewer and water capacity. Also included in the Application booklet is a copy of a follow up letter to Mr. Dougherty and Mr. Powell requesting a response. 8. Copies of correspondence from TAC members, as of this date, are also included in the Application booklet. 9. Regarding the Landscape Plan, please note that revised plans have been prepared by Joanne Samarzija of Salsbery Bros.Landscaping.You will note that with this new plan the protection & utilization existing trees along the perimeter of the site has been addressed. With respect to residential development objective #1 in the 1991 Comprehensive Plan please note that all common areas, whether they are ponds, landscaping, etc.. are accessible either directly or by way of easements to public right-of-way. With regard to open space this project,if considered to stand alone,contains roughly 8.0 acres of ponds, common area, etc.. along with 3.3 acres of perimeter landscape easements totaling 11.3 acres, or 13.8 % of the total project. Our goal however, has always been to include this project as an extension of the Waterstone Community as illustrated by our rezone request earlier this year which, you will recall, received a favorable recommendation from the Plan Commission. So while asserting our position that this project is an continuation of Waterstone I offer the following data with regard to open space: Area Total Acreage Open Space % Open Space Waterstone 288 ac. 64.8 ac. 22.5 % Bayhill & Brookfield 81 ac. 11.3 ac. 13.8 % Total 369 ac. 75.6 ac. 20.5 % It is our conviction therefore,that the design, proposed open spaces and greenbelts for Bayhill and Brookfield, together with the existing Waterstone development, creates abundant expanses of open space. Regarding the existing wetland area as shown on the National Inventory Map and located adjacent to 126th Street and West of the proposed 126th entrance, I submit the subsequent commentary.The dredging and enlarging of this wetland is permitted under the Nationwide Permit from the Corps of Engineers since 1). it is under one acre in size, and 2). it is not considered a high quality wetland as identified on the Inventory Maps. Dave Cunningham December 10, 1993 Page 3 of 4 10. The locations of proposed signage has been added to primary plat. The dimensions of the signs have been included in the Application booklet. 11. The street names were forwarded to Carmel/Clay Communications and they asked to have two street names revised. The two street names have been revised and resubmitted to Carmel/Clay Communications for approval. A copy of correspondence is included in the Application booklet. 12. A street stub has been added to the South property line. 13. A copy of the Primary Plat was forwarded to Randy Powell of the City Engineer's Office on November 15, 1993. A copy of the letter is included in the enclosed Application booklet for your reference. As of this date I have not received any comments regarding the entrance configuration and street design. Also included in the Application booklet is a copy of a follow up letter to Mr. Powell requesting a response. 14. The accel decel lanes have been dimensioned for your review. 15. A copy of the Primary Plat was forwarded to Randy Powell of the City Engineer's Office, Kent Ward of the Surveyor's Office and John South of the Hamilton County Soil and Water Conservation Office on November 15, 1993. A copy of the letters are included in the enclosed Application booklet for your reference. As of this date I have not received any comments from Mr. Powell or Mr. Ward. Also included in the Application booklet is a copy of a follow up letter to Mr. Powell and Mr. Ward requesting a response. A comment letter has been received from John South. A copy of correspondence with Mr. South is included in Application booklet. 16. A non-access easement has been added along the right-of-way of 126th Street. 17. Sections 6.3.15, 6.3.16, 6.3.17 and 6.3.18 of the Subdivision Control Ordinance are and will be met in the design of this project. 18. Right-of-ways have been dimensioned on the Primary Plat. 19. Perimeter road improvements, if any, are addressed in the Traffic Impact Study by A & F Engineering 20. A drainage easement has been added to the back of lot 83. 21. Monuments, markers and benchmark have been added to the Primary Plat. Dave Cunningham December 10, 1993 Page 4 of 4 22. A breakdown of overall acreage and common areas is listed under item 9 of this letter.The surrounding development densities is included in the Application booklet. 23. The area West of lot 89 has been labeled as common area on the Primary Plat. 24. The greenbelt easement does not continue in front of lots 83 thru 88 and has been removed. 25. You will find several of the items listed in section 7.1.3 of the cluster ordinance included in the Application booklet and in the covenants & restrictions, including: - location & style of building units - general architectural style - exterior building materials - treatment of greenbelts and open spaces - site landscaping and signage - maintenance of common areas A parking plan has been added to the primary plat. 26. Public Notice information will be forwarded to you by Mr. Jim Nelson. 27. A $ 1070.00 application fee will be forwarded to you by Waterstone Land Co., LP. No variances of the Subdivision Regulations are being sought with this application. Please note that we have changed the Bayhill portion of the project to Bayhill at Waterstone, Sections 6 & 7 and that the lot numbers for Bayhill now start with 170. If you should have any questions, or are in need of additional information, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, S NEIDER E7RING CORP. Dave Sexton Project Manager . r t Cityof C --" in il ;i��U , David Sexton November 22, 1993 Schneider Engineering 3020 North Post Road Indpls., IN 46226-6518 Re: Brookfield/Bayhill - Primary Plat - Preliminary review Dear David, Upon review of your submitted materials, I have found the following items will need to be addressed: Support items 0- Statement from the City Street Department and the City Engineer's office regarding the impact of the development on the surrounding roadway system and recommended improvements for each adjoining street and entrance point QZ - Confirm scale of overall plat on sheet S-1 0- Covenants and restrictions for this development -none submitted - please be sure the following items are addressed - dusk to dawn yard lights to be installed on each lot by the builder/developer per 7.1.7 of the Cluster ordinance. - specific sections on the maintenance and replacement of material in the common areas - a restriction on fencing along major thoroughfares and in common areas O- Still awaiting submittal of traffic impact study, upon submittal will review and forward comments 5 A soils report needs to be submitted to go with the soils map included in the submittal fo - Please submit support documents required by the Subdivision Regulations - i.e. report on utilities, drainage and Comp. Plan 0- A statement from Carmel Sewer and Water Utility needs to be submitted confirming adequate capacity ®- Correspondence from the TAC members needs to be submitted upon receipt, as of the date of this letter no correspondence has been received. ®- Landscape plan - has been reviewed by Mike Hollibaugh of our office, preliminary review, indicates the following: - If this is a cluster, where is the open space? This lack of open space is a serious design flaw. This plan needs to go back to the drawing board. - In order to design a more complete buffer, it is recommended that additional plant material be added to the greenbelt buffer of lots 69 through 73, which back up to 126th Street. ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL,INDIANA 46032 317/571-2400 Page 2 Brookfield Nov. 22, 1993 - The protection/utilization of existing trees on this site appears have been given little consideration with this proposal. Residential Development Objective #1, in the 1991 Comprehensive Plan, states that, "wherever possible, natural amenities such as greenbelts, trees stands, creeks, and drainage courses should be accessible and visible to the public from public right's-of-way and roadways...."(p80). Explain how this Objective has been addressed in this proposal.. - Provide Department with copy of wetland delineation report and approval letters from Army Corps and IDEM for encroachment or filling of wetlands on this project site. Signage plan -please dimension proposed signage -to confirm compliance with the sign ordinance - where will the signage be place, at what entrances? Will there internal directional, phasing or predevelopment signs for this project? Primary Plat 0Street and Subdivision names will need to receive approval from the Cannel\Clay Communications Center - Jerry Lowe 0- Please include a stub street to the south property - for the development of the long narrow tract owned by American Aggregates, which is already stubbed from the south from Lake Forest, this will allow for the development of that parcel with a minimum length cul-de-sac and additional stub to the east and eventually to Hazeldell Road. This stub could be accomplished with minimum disturbance by moving lots 91, 90 & 89 to the west and placing the stub across from Windbush Way. 0Please contact the City Engineer's office regarding the entrance configuration of island and street design. They will need the Board of Public Works and Safety approval as shown. 14 Currently, the accel/decel lanes have been shown at the entrance, please dimension so compliance as to length can be shown per the regulations. 16 Location, size and capacity of storm sewer, water system and sanitary sewer will need to be reviewed by the appropriate Departments, County Surveyor, SCS & City Engineer for drainage, sanitary and water. 0- Non-access easements need to be added along perimeter of project that abuts public right-of-ways. 0Can I have a Certification statement from the design engineer stating that sections 6.3.15, 6.3.16, 6.3.17 & 6.3.18 will be met in the design of this project? Q- Please dimension right-of-ways throughout and around the development to show conformance with the Comprehensive plan for ROW dedication. 0- Currently, no road improvements are shown to the perimeter thoroughfares - are we awaiting traffic impact study for recommendations, or are no improvements planned Q Drainage easements will need to be added along the back of lot 83. ® Monuments, markers and benchmark need to be added to the plat Page 3 Brookfield Nov. 22, 1993 ®- Prepare a break down of overall acreage/common area/flood plain/and surrounding developments density be completed and included for the file? aThe area to the west of lot 89 needs to be labeled as common area or its proposed use indicated QDoes the greenbelt easement continue in front lots 83 thru 88? Supportive materials - per Cluster ordinance 0- Please refer to section 7.1.3 of the cluster ordinance and be prepared to address the following items at the Plan Commission; - the location and style of building units - the general architectural style - the exterior building materials - treatment of the greenbelt buffers and other open spaces - site lighting, landscaping, and signage - number of and location of all parking spaces - proposed restrictive covenants - means of adequately maintaining all common areas Public Notice aas of the date of this letter, I have not received any of the Public Notice information required by the ordinance. Filing Fee a A $1070.00 + $100.00 for each requested variance of the Subdivision Regulations will need to be submitted. The above comments will need to be addressed and updated plans need to be submitted no later than December 10, 1993, to assure our office adequate time to review your proposed project. I have tenantively scheduled you for a preliminary review of the Primary Plat by TAC at the December 22, 1993 TAC meeting. I will tenantively schedule you for the Jan. 18, 1994 Plan Commission meeting. t Page 3 Brookfield Nov. 22, 1993 If you have any questions to the above comments or the process before you, feel free to contact me at (317) 571-2444, at your convenience. Sincerely A Al de, _------------ David D. C/ ingham, AICP Assistant/erector Department of Community Development City of Carmel, Indiana DDC cc: George Sweet, 9502 Angola Court, Indpls., IN 46268 Plan Commission File DDC file Mike Hollibaugh DOCD Staff file HAM. Co. siva) CARMEL PC (4001 • 41 SIP" - • ol Maui'ton County Soil and Water Conservation District 925 piviSion Street—Nob1esvjfle IN 4606.0-2744—(317)7734406—Fax(317)776-1101 Erasiou and S(*huent Control On-site ti4i.1uation and Assistance Project Naine: ____VaLL-741<xtt e Project By: ers.7iA.t-4/3". . 7L • - • • 4' Pf a 111, -40, • . . Reported By: '! . Present at Site: • • • Location: - AZ . . Section: 53 T: R: ; reportare intrude:1 to evaluateiccaentation cidic and ctirpicmic43a.t1il plarr,as well as , identify areas where additional.mamas inay be requined n:annntnal erosipn,and sediment_All pracrices included in the plan,. ias welt as*me suggested in the corments sivrapi be erOared as to Thigt.feasibil#T tin qualified iuslividual with sriliqnral ndices designed.by'.gqualified.txtgine' et :" T. . • —A11 erasion end sedan=control should meet tile designtitetia." standards and vecifmatiens outlined in the"Indiana Handbook for Eresiari Control in Developing Areas"availiibteAnin tbe lab)nars9piirt*It oftiattual Re =4.Division nrSng : will Nesse respond within ten days to the concerns expressed in this letter.If!hart is no response,a copy of this letter LI be Sent to Indiana Dep.arnuentOILrifirnoninotauStaaagement(MEM). . " , • •Type of Evaluation: britoutine U Ffoliow-up U Complaint r YES • . . NO GEtstElka,PROVISIONS :; - • • • IA _NA Erosion -.11(1 sedimentationt .1 an. Vailable on conaruction site 18 Is the plan being implemented • - patuutiankaffitsediguntation) . . 2A V Evidence of sediment leavtng the site • 213 ,7 Site conditionE present*4 potential foi off-bite damage from seniment . . 2C _se•_ Evidence that soil/Sediment is being tracked onto public roads .Erasiall.and-S4mentadinti Conktrol.frarticpc 3A V" Erosion and sedimentation control appropriately incorporated into earthmoving activities 3B _ sve,caoteg 041 Do practices require maintenance or modification 3C Practices Installed in the Proper locations 3D re On-Site drainage cbirtild nad outlet%Stabilized 3E at Areas stabilized as specified in the construction sequence 3F Si01111 sewer inlets protected to prevent sediment from entering stormwater nigt.system . -. • -- ......+ i r uttut HAM. CO, SVFCD -r-4_) C _• ... 1 CARMEL PC ��t02 • Additi Comments: 1 eq - 1 4 i er _"w f .J.'.-}f I y.. is - 62' ei c y i j f+l0.c as i ` Grp , ,j/fi��f/�j -C ,'L e'r'f+F +Zn4' -fir Are ,,ff Lr: +.T „� - • j __.._.....L----''":" ----""—"--------- "''—'-'---"---T---'''—""''-*'.—"'"—"-7---""-"'"--'"--' " ----- , '—''"--'"'"' "..-* --"'--."' ''"- -"----- —'"+." --".'"--"----- "'""" ------- •-. --.....—:—....-- .. , 1 f j i t (--, 1 0 MEMO November 22, 1993 TO: Dave Cunningham, A.I.C.P. FROM: Mike HollibGugh Re: Bayhill & Bro )kfield at Waterstone - Primary Plat 1. If this is a cluster, where is the open space? This lack of open space is a serious design flaw. This plan needs to go back to the drawing board. 2. In order to design a more complete buffer, it is recommendended that addtional plant material be added to the greenbelt buffer of lots 69 through 73, which back up to 126th Street. 3. The protection/utilization of existing trees on this site appears have been given little consideration with this proposal. Residential Development Objective #1, in the 1991 Comprehensive Plan, states that, "wherever possible, natural amenities such as greenbelts, trees stands, creeks, aqnd drainage courses should be accessible and visible to the public from public rights-of-way and roadways...."(p 80). Explain how this Objective has been addressed in this proposal.. 4. Provide Department with copy of wetland delineation report and approval letters from Army Corps and IDEM for encroachment or filling of wetlands on this project site. 5. BOARD Carmel Clay Schools President ADMINISTRATION SUE RICHARDSON ti CLAYS Cf, Vice-President R. STEPHEN TEGARDEN, Ph.D. HAROLD O. CASALI O Director of Elementary Education Secretary NANCYLEE C. BUCKLEY JON R. SCHMIDTKE, Ph.D. Director of Employee Members 4 and Student Relations CAROL CHEGAR JAMES F BURRELL, Ed.S. PHILIP N. ESKEW, Jr., M.D. 9Rti1EL,IN��P�P Director of Personnel November 23, 1993 SCOTT CHANDLER Director of Business ROGER D. HARPER, Ed.S. Director of Media Services KAREN K. NIEMEYER, M.L.S. Mr. Dave Sexton Schneider Engineering Corporation 3020 North Post Road Indianapolis, IN 46226-6518 RE: BAYHILL AND BROOKFIELD AT WATERSTONE Dear Mr. Sexton: Carmel Clay Schools appreciates notification of Bayhill and Brookfield at Waterstone primary plat application. The school corporation has two areas of concern. In the interest of safety, the installation of sidewalks should be mandated within the subdivision. In addition, any cul-de-sacs should be a minimum of 93 feet to accommodate the turning radius of an 84 passenger school bus. Information regarding the development of new subdivisions is extremely beneficial, as the school corporation continually reviews long range plans to accommodate the educational needs of this growing community. Carmel Clay Schools fully intends to provide a quality educational program for the patrons of Bayhill and Brookfield at Waterstone. Sincerely, Roge r D. Harper Dire or of Busin•ss RDH:nbw cc: Mr. David Cunningham DOCD EDUCATIONAL SERVICES CENTER • 5201 E. 131ST STREET • CARMEL,IN 46033 • TELEPHONE(317)844-9961 • FAX(317)844-9965 Na"0"F"cAiicy� Ol ! OF..Cqq 6 - - City ®f Carm /`TON .Co,''I�1 � OS 0 010 December 20, 1993 TO: Dave Cunningham FROM: David Klingensmith RE: Brookfield/Bayhill - Primary Plat This development will indeed have an impact of increased traffic and road maintenance. I relinquish further comment on this proposed development to the Department of Community Development and the Engineering Department. Thank you, ) ,..,, / ' ,.....J David W. Klingensm. 7 Street Commission DK/jf cc: David Sexton, Schneider Engineering Tom Welch, Engineer 211 2nd STREET,S.W. CARMEL,INDIANA 46032 317/571-2637 -- ---.v- .,...,, ,oftut HAN. CO. SWCD -►-+a CARREL PC a004 ^\ 19i PP { 925 Division Street - Noblesville Int 48x8 l 1 3!?) ?� -z�o��t i IFAX 776-1101 I November 18, 1693 To: Director Department of Community Development One Civic Square Carmel IN 46032 From: John 8. South P.B., SweD Engineer 43_ 4g4.,g Project: Bayhill and Brookfield at Waterstaue Primary Detail soil information is available at the SCS-SWCD Office. The map on the plans only locate the soii types with abbreviated soil names. According to the USDA-SCS inventory of potential wetlands and USDI NWS inventory maps there is tiie potential of a wetland on this site. Maps may be viewed at the SCS-SWCD office. Private consultants will make an on-site determination. It appears from the size of this project a Notice of Intent letter is required to be filed with Indiana Department of 8u2vironmental Management. Comments: 1- Soils and area maps would be helpful. 2. A drainage summary is needed. 3. How are you overcoming the soil limitations for Westiand? 4. Drainage easement is needed at the rear of lot 27. 5. Review drainage at the rear of lots 11-15. 6. How much outer enters the project at the rear of lots 4 and 5? 7. The lake elevations are unreali