HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Recommendations to PC 09-20-88 •
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
to
Carmel Plan Commission
Meeting of September 20, 1988
PUBLIC HEARINGS
lg. Docket No.89-88 DP/ADLS, Dr. Martin Linderman
Staff recommends suspension of the rules and a vote on the
project per Committee recommendation.
2g. Docket No.90-88 P.P. Lake Forest (Cluster)
Staff does not feel this project meets the strictest interpreta-
tion of the purpose and intent of the Cluster Housing Ordinance.
Staff recommends the project go to the Subdivision Committee for
review.
3g. Docket No.91-88 P.P. , Laurelwood Subdivision.
Staff recommends this project go to the Subdivision Committee for
review.
OLD BUSINESS
li. Docket No.70-88 ALDS, True Value Hardware
Staff recommends approval per the Indistrial and Commercial Com-
mittee recommendation, with the understanding that any additional
signage will need to meet the requirements of the Carmel Sign Or-
dinance and that a date for completion for any proposed improve-
ments will be determined by the Plan Commission.
2i. Docket No.74-88 DP/ADLS, Phase One, Meridian Corporate Plaza
Refer to Mayor Hancock's letter of September 19, 1988.
3i. Docket No. 79-88 ADLS, Dan Young Chevrolet
Staff has no comment at this time.
4i. Docket No. 83-88 Z, US 31 and 136th St. , E. Davis Coots
Tabled for new Public Hearing by Petitioner.
1
5i. Docket No.86-88 ADLS, Carmel Walk Shopping Center
Staff recommends approval per Industrial and Commercial Committee
recommendation.
6i. Docket No. 87-88 ADLS, Firestone
Staff recommends approval per Industrial and Commercial Committee
recommendation.
7i. Cluster Housing
Staff has no recommendation at this time.
NEW BUSINESS
lh. Docket No. 95-88 ADLS, Day Furs
Petitioner has proceeded with improvements to the exterior of
building without Plan Commission or Staff approval. Staff has no
problem with the proposed improvements and recommends the Plan
Commission hear the presentation, and if satisfied suspend the
rules and vote on the proposal as presented.
If the Plan Commission has any questions or concerns with the
proposed project, it should send the project to the Industrial
and Commercial Committee for review and consideration.
2h. Docket No. 96-88 ADLS, Carmel Office Court
Staff recommends this project be sent to the appropriate com-
mittee for review and consideration.
•
2