The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCorrespondence, etc. for "The Greens" project name pre Linkside, pre Shelbourne Green dz • October 5, 1993 DEVELOPMENT, L.P. Director Carmel Department of Community Development One Civic Square Carmel, Indiana 46032 Re: The Greens Dear Director: We understand that the following agreement will be considered as part of our final plat application for the project referred to above: The developer shall be responsible for any drainage problems ; including standing water, flooding and faulty erosion control, which arise or become evident at any time during the three year maintenance period after release of subdivision improvement bonds, and which are directly attributable to a deficiency in the subdivision drainage design or the initial construction by the developer of the drainage improvements. This shall include all pipes, structures, swales, ditches and ponds. The responsibility of the developer hereunder shall not, however, include problems which are created subsequent to the completion by the developer of the subdivision improvements , including problems resulting from the improper grading by individual build- ers or structures or improper grading installed or accomplished by individual homeowners or their agents. It is the intent of this requirement that the developer shall, specifically, provide such subsurface drains or storm sewers or ditches as are required to properly rectify any drainage problem or subsurface water problem which was not contemplated in the original approved subdivision design, including disposal of subsurface water from footing drains or individual lots. Davis Development, L.P. , general partner By: Davis Development, Inc. , general partner By e (� r=1-- Chris R. White Executive Vice President Witness to-5 -c13 Date 3755 East 82nd Street, Suite 120, Indianapolis, Indiana 46240 (317) 595-2900 FAX (317) 595-2930 DEVELOPMENT, L.P. October 5, 1993 Mr. David Cunningham Department of Community Development One Civic Square Carmel, Indiana 46032 Re: Primary Plat The Greens Dear Dave: The above mentioned subdivision is coordinated with the Compre- hensive Plan as follows: Thoroughfare Plan - The proposed project connects with Annaly Downs on the North side and Towne Lakes on the East. The proposed project shall dedicate 50 foot half right of way on West 96th Street and 40 foot half right of way on Shelborne Road per the Thoroughfare Plan . All interior streets shall be 30 feet of pavement with 50 feet of right of way except for cul-de-sacs , which shall have 26 feet of pavement. Stub streets are proposed to the north, and east along existing subdivisions. Sanitary - Sanitary service shall be provided by the Clay Waste District . Sewers presently exist in Towne Lakes Subdivision, Shelborne Road, and Annaly Downs Subdivision. Connection to an offsite Lift Station is proposed along the North Side of West 96th Street. School - Request for services report has been forwarded to Car- mel/Clay Schools. Water - Indianapolis Water Company will supply water service to the project. Drainage - Plans for stormwater management will be prepared by a registered engineer per the Comprehensive Drainage Plan. The maintenance of said drainage system shall be turned over to the Hamilton County Drainage Board. 3755 East 82nd Street, Suite 120, Indianapolis, Indiana 46240 (317) 595-2900 FAX (317) 595-2930 Mr. David Cunningham Page Two October 5, 1993 Please review this information and if you have any questions , please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, ris R. White, P.E. Enclosure dayis DEVELOPMENT, L.P. October 5 , 1993 Mr. David Cunningham Department of Community Development One Civic Square Carmel, Indiana 46032 Re: The Greens - Utility Report Dear Dave: Water System - The proposed water tem viaowater mains along r The Greens is intended to provide service toeach lot the right-of-way of the Proosennectedttoean• The existingtl2 inch at will be primarily an 8 inch main co West 96th street and Shelbourne Road. Within the subdivision, 8 inch mains will be internally looped with 6 inch mains serving the proposed cul-de-sacs. Fire hydrants and valves will be provided at locations consistent with the requirements of the Clay Township Fire Department. Water service will be provided by the Indianapolis Water Company. Sanitary Sewer System - The sanitary sewer system for The Greens connection to each lot. is intended to sanitary ide wastevity willbe by the Treatment ofthe Clay Township Regional Waste District. The onsite sewers will be designed and constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Clay Township Regional Waste Dis- trict and the State of Indiana. An average daily flow from this project will be 343 lots at 310 gal. /day ( 106 , 330 GPD) . A sewer allocation will be applied with Clay Township Regional Waste District. The proposed 8 inch PVC sewer will connect at three connection points as follows: ( 1) to the west to the existing 10 inch sewer on Shelborne Road, (2 ) to the east to the existing 8 inch sewer at Towne Lakes and (3) to the south to the existing lift station at 96th Street and Township Line Road. Storm Sewer System - The proposed storm system for The Greens is intended to collect storm water in the conventional fashion utilizing curb inlets, beehive inlets, and manholes. Detention of developed stormwater will be provided in lakes located onsite and within the golf course . The discharge from the detention facilities will be to Crooked Creek and will be in accordance 3755 East 82nd Street, Suite 120, Indianapolis, Indiana 46240 (317) 595-2900 FAX (317) 595-2930 Mr. David Cunningham Page Two October 5, 1993 with local drainage requirements . In general , the developed discharge under 100 year, 24 hour storm conditions will be re- stricted to the peak discharge under predeveloped 10 year 24 hour conditions. If you have any questions, please contact me at 595-2903 . Sincerely, Chris R. White, P.E. DRAFT 11-5-93 PLAT COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS THE GREENS The undersigned, DAVIS DEVELOPMENT, L.P. , an Indiana limited partnership (the "Developer") , is the Owner of the real estate more specifically described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto (the "Real Estate" ) . The Developer is concurrently platting and subdi- viding the Real Estate as shown on the plat for The Greens, which is filed of record , 1993, in the office of the Record- er of Hamilton County, Indiana (the "Plat" ) and desires in the Plat to subject the Real Estate to the provisions of these Plat Covenants and Restrictions. The subdivision created by the Plat (the "Subdivision") is to be known and designated as "The Greens" . In addition to the covenants and restrictions hereinaf- ter set forth, the Real Estate is also subject to those covenants and restrictions contained in the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of The Greens, dated , 1993 and recorded on , 1993 as Instrument No. , in the office of the Recorder of Hamilton County, Indiana, as the same may be amended or supplemented from time to time as therein provided (the "Declaration" ) , and to the rights, powers, duties and obligations of the The Greens Community Asso- ciation, Inc. (the "Association") , set forth in the Declaration. If there is any irreconcilable conflict between any of the cove- nants and restrictions contained herein and any of the covenants and restrictions contained in the Declaration, the covenants and restrictions contained in the Declaration shall govern and con- trol, but only to the extent of the irreconcilable conflict, it being the intent hereof that all covenants and restrictions contained herein shall be applicable to the Real Estate to the fullest extent possible. Capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meaning as given in the Declaration. In order to provide adequate protection to all present and future Owners of Lots or Residence Units in the Subdivision, the following covenants and restrictions, in addition to those set forth in the Declaration, are hereby imposed upon the Real Estate: 1 . PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. The rights-of-way of the streets as shown on the Plat, if not heretofore dedicated to the public, are hereby dedicated to the public for use as a public right-of- way. 2 . COMMON AREAS. There are areas of ground on the Plat marked "Common Area" . Developer hereby declares, creates and grants a non-exclusive easement in favor of each Owner for the use and enjoyment of the Common Areas, subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the Declaration. 3 . UTILITY, DRAINAGE AND SEWER EASEMENTS. There are areas of ground on the Plat marked "Utility Easements, Drainage Easements and Sewer Easements" , either separately or in combination. The Utility Easements are hereby created and reserved for the use of all public utility companies (not including transportation companies) , governmental agencies and the Association for access to and installation, maintenance, repair or removal of poles, mains, ducts, drains, lines, wires, cables and other equipment and facilities for the furnishing of utility services, including cable television services . The Drainage Easements are hereby created and reserved for (i) the use of Developer during the "Development Period" (as such term is defined in the Declaration) for access to and installation, repair or removal of a drainage system, either by surface drainage or appropriate underground installations, for the Real Estate and adjoining property and (ii) the use of the Associa- tion and the Hamilton County Drainage Board for access to and maintenance, repair and replacement of such drainage system. The owner of any Lot in the Subdivision subject to a Drainage Ease- ment, including any builder, shall be required to keep the por- tion of said Drainage Easement on his Lot free from obstructions so that the storm water drainage will be unimpeded and will not be changed or altered without a permit from the Hamilton County Drainage Board and prior written approval of the Developer. The Sewer Easements are hereby created and reserved for the use of the Clay Township Regional Waste District and, during the Devel- opment Period, for the use of Developer for access to and instal- lation, repair, removal replacement or maintenance of an under- ground storm and sanitary sewer system. The delineation of the Utility, Drainage and Sewer Easement areas on the Plat shall not be deemed a limitation on the rights of any entity for whose use any such easement is created and reserved to go on any Lot sub- ject to such easement temporarily to the extent reasonably neces- sary for the exercise of the rights granted to it by this Para- graph 3 . Except as installed by Developer or installed as pro- vided above, no structures or improvements, including without limitation decks, patios, or walkways, shall be erected or main- tained upon said easements . 4 . LANDSCAPE EASEMENTS. There are areas of ground on the plat marked "Landscape Easements" which are hereby created and reserved: (i) for the use of the Developer during the Develop- ment Period for access to and the installation, maintenance and replacement of foliage, landscaping, screening materials and other improvements and (ii) for the use of the Association for access to and the installation, maintenance and replacement of foliage, landscaping, screening materials and other improvements . Except as installed by Developer or installed and maintained by the Association or with the prior written consent of the Archi- tectural Review Committee, no structure or improvements, main- tained in or upon said Landscape Easements . 5. ACCESS EASEMENTS. There are areas of ground on the plat -2- marked "Access Easements" . Such Access Easements are hereby created and reserved as non-exclusive easements in favor of each Owner for pedestrian access via sidewalk or other constructed pathway to 6 . BUILDING LOCATION - FRONT, BACK AND SIDE YARD REQUIRE- MENTS. Building lines are established on the Plat. No building shall be erected or maintained between said setback lines and the front, rear or side lot line (as the case may be) of a Lot. The setback lines may vary in depth in excess of the minimum as designated on the Plat. Except as otherwise shown on the Plat, the minimum front yard set back shall be Twenty-Five (25) feet. Except as otherwise shown on the Plat, the minimum rear yard setback shall be twenty (20) feet. The minimum side yard set back shall be five (5) feet, with a minimum aggregate side yard between residences of ten (10) feet. 7 . RESIDENTIAL UNIT SIZE AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS. No resi- dence constructed on a Lot shall have less than Twelve Hundred (1200) square feet of total floor area, exclusive of garages, carports and open porches. Each residence Unit shall include an attached two-car (or larger) enclosed garage. The maximum height of any residential dwelling constructed on a lot shall be twenty-five (25) feet measured from finished grade to the underside of the eave line. 8. RESIDENTIAL UNIT USE. All Lots in the Subdivision shall be used solely for residential purposes . No business building shall be erected on any lot, and no business may be conducted on any part thereof. No building shall be erected, placed or per- mitted to remain on any Lot other than one detached single-family residence not to exceed two and a half (2 1/2) stories in height and permanently attached residential accessory buildings . Any garage, tool shed, storage building or any other attached build- ing erected or used as an accessory building to a residence shall be of a permanent type of construction and shall conform to the general architecture and appearance of such residence. 9 . ACCESSORY AND TEMPORARY BUILDINGS. No trailers, shacks, outhouses or detached or unenclosed storage sheds, tool sheds or accessory buildings of any kind shall be erected or situated on any Lot in the Subdivision, except that used by the Developer or by a builder during the construction of a residential building on the property, which temporary construction structures shall be removed upon completion of construction of the Subdivision or building, as the case may be. 10. TEMPORARY RESIDENCE. No trailer, camper, motor home, truck, shack, tent, boat, recreational vehicle, basement, garage or outbuilding may be used at any time as a residence, temporary or permanent; nor may any structure of a temporary character be used as a residence. -3- 11 . NUISANCES. No domestic animals raised for commercial purposes and no farm animals or fowl shall be kept or permitted on any Lot. No noxious, unlawful or otherwise offensive activity shall be carried out on any Lot, nor shall anything be done thereon which may be or may become a serious annoyance or nui- sance to the neighborhood. 12 . VEHICLE PARKING. No camper, motor home, truck, trailer, boat, snowmobile or other recreational vehicle of any kind may be stored on any Lot in open public view. No vehicles of any kind may be put up on blocks or jacks to accommodate car repair on a Lot unless such repairs are done in the garage. Disabled vehi- cles shall not be allowed to remain in open public view. 13 . SIGNS. No sign of any kind shall be displayed to the public view on any Lot, except that one sign of not more than six (6) square feet may be displayed at any time for the purpose of advertising a property for sale, and except that Developer and its affiliates and designees may use larger signs during the sale and development of the Subdivision. 14. MAILBOXES. All mailboxes and replacement mailboxes shall be uniform and shall conform to the standards set forth by the Architectural Review Committee. 15 . GARBAGE AND REFUSE DISPOSAL. Trash and refuse disposal will be on an individual basis, lot by lot. The community shall not contain dumpsters or other forms of general or common trash accumulation except to facilitate development and house construc- tion. No Lot shall be used or maintained as a dumping ground for trash. Rubbish, garbage and other waste shall be kept in sani- tary containers. All equipment for storage or disposal of such materials shall be kept clean and shall not be stored on any Lot in open public view. No rubbish, garbage or other waste shall be allowed to accumulate on any Lot. No homeowner or occupant of a Lot shall burn or bury any garbage or refuse. All garbage, trash cans and receptacles and woodpiles shall be screened. 16. STORAGE TANKS. No gas, oil or other storage tanks shall be installed on any Lot. 17 . WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE SYSTEMS. No private or semi- private water supply or sewage disposal system may be located upon any Lot. No septic tank, absorption field or similar method of sewage disposal shall be located or constructed on any Lot. **** purposes shall be permitted by these restrictions if other- wise permitted by law and rules and regulations governing the construction or use thereof, however, all proposed uses of geothermal water systems must initially receive approval from the Architectural Committee before being allowed to be constructed. Geothermal heat pumps shall be of the closed loop type only. 18. DITCHES AND SWALES. All owners, including builders, -4- shall keep unobstructed and in good maintenance and repair all open storm water drainage ditches and swales which may be located on their respective Lots . All sump pump discharges shall be connected to a subsurface drain, storm sewer or lake . No drains shall be discharges directly to the ground surface. 19 . GARAGES/DRIVEWAYS. Each driveway in the Subdivision shall be of concrete or asphalt material and shall be subject to the approval of the Architectural Review Committee. All garages opening to the street shall have automatic controls. 20. ANTENNA AND SATELLITE DISHES. No outside antennas or satellite dishes shall be permitted in the Subdivision. 21 . AWNINGS. No metal, fiberglass, canvas or similar type material awnings or patio covers shall be permitted in the Subdi- vision. 22 . FENCING. No fence shall be erected on or along any Lot line, nor on any Lot, the purposes or result of which will be to obstruct reasonable vision, light or air. All fences shall be kept in good repair and erected so as to enclose the property and decorate the same without unreasonable hindrance or obstruction to any other property. Any fencing permitted to be used in the Subdivision must be wooden or black vinyl coated chain link and shall not be higher than six (6) feet. Uncoated chain link fencing is prohibited. No fencing shall extend forward of the furthest back front corner of the residence. All fencing style, color, location and height shall be generally consistent within the Subdivision and shall be subject to prior written approval of the Architectural Review Committee. 23 . SWIMMING POOLS. No above-ground swimming pools shall permitted in the Subdivision. 24 . SOLAR PANELS. No solar heat panels shall be permitted on roofs of any structures in the Subdivision. All such panels shall be enclosed within fenced areas and shall be concealed from the view of neighboring Lots, common areas and the streets . 25 . OUTSIDE LIGHTING. Except as otherwise approved by the Developer, all outside lighting contained in or with respect to the Subdivision shall be of an ornamental nature compatible with the architecture of the project and shall provide for projection of light so as not to create a glare, distraction or nuisance to other property owners in the vicinity of or adjacent to the project. All lot owners shall be required to have installed at least one gas or electric "dusk to dawn" yard light in the front yard. Such lights are to be installed by the Developer or Build- er prior to final inspection by the Carmel Department of Communi- ty Development. Al garages opening to the street shall have automatic door controls . -5- 26. SITE OBSTRUCTIONS. No fence, wall, hedge or shrub planting which obstructs sight lines at elevations between two (2) and nine (9) feet above the street shall be placed or permit- ted to remain on any corner lot within the triangular area formed by the street property lines and a line connecting points twenty- five (25) feet from the intersection of said street lines, or in the case of a rounded property corner, from the intersection of the street lines extended. The same sight-line limitations shall apply to any Lot within ten (10) feet from the intersection of a street line with the edge of a driveway pavement or alley line. No tree shall be permitted to remain within such distances of such intersections unless the foliage line is maintained at a sufficient height to prevent obstruction of such sight lines. 27 . BUILDING COMPLETION. Every single-family dwelling, outbuilding, or other structure permitted to be constructed or remain on any lot shall be completed on the exterior within one (1) year from the start of the construction, including at least one (1) coat of paint, stain or varnish on any exterior wood surfaces. All such structures must be completed and the site graded, sodded or seeded and reasonably landscaped within one (1) year from the date of the commencement of construction thereof. During the period of construction of any structure of any lot, the lot shall be kept and maintained in a sightly and orderly manner and no trash or other rubbish shall be permitted to accumu- late unreasonably on any such lot. 28. VIOLATION. Violation or threatened violation of these covenants and restrictions shall be grounds for an action by the Developer, the Association or any person or entity having any right, title or interest in the Real Estate, and all persons or entities claiming under them, against the person or entity vio- lating or threatening to violate any such covenants or restric- tions. Available relief in any such action shall include recov- ery of damages for such violation, injunctive relief against any such violation or threatened violation, declaratory relief and the recovery of costs and attorneys reasonable fees incurred by any party successfully enforcing these covenants and restric- tions; provided, however, that neither the Developer nor the Association shall be liable for damages of any kind to any person for failing to enforce such covenants or restrictions. 29 . CARMEL PLANNING COMMISSION. The Carmel Planning Commis- sion, its successors and assigns shall have no right, power or authority to enforce any covenants, restrictions or other limi- tations contained herein other than those covenants, restrictions or limitations that expressly run in favor of the Carmel Planning Commission; provided that nothing herein shall be construed to prevent the Carmel Planning Commission from enforcing any provi- sions of the Subdivision Control Ordinance, as amended, or any conditions attached to approval of the Plat by the Plat Commit- tee. -6- 30. AMENDMENT. These covenants and restrictions may be amended at any time by the then owners of at least sixty-seven percent (67%) of the Lots in all Subdivisions which are now or hereafter made subject to and annexed to the Declaration; provid- ed, however, that until all of the Lots in such Subdivisions have been sold by Developer, any such amendment shall require the prior written approval of Developer. Each such amendment shall be evidenced by a written instrument, signed by the Owner or Owners concurring therein, which instrument shall set forth facts sufficient to indicate compliance with this paragraph and shall be recorded in the office of the Recorder of Hamilton County, Indiana. No amendment which adversely affects the rights of a public utility shall be effective with respect to such public utility without its written consent thereto. No amendment which is contrary to a zoning commitment shall be effective without the written approval of the affected adjacent homeowners associations designated by the City of Carmel. 31 . TERM. The foregoing plat covenants and restrictions, as the same may be amended from time to time, shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all persons or entities from time to time having any right, title or interest in the Real Estate and on all persons or entities claiming under them, until Decem- ber 31, 2012, and thereafter they shall continue automatically in effect unless terminated by a vote of a majority of the then Owners of the Lots in the Subdivision; provided, however, that no termination of said these covenants and restrictions shall affect any easement hereby created and reserved unless all persons entitled to the beneficial use of such easement shall have con- sented thereto in writing. 32 . SEVERABILITY. Invalidation of any of the foregoing covenants or restrictions by judgment or court order shall in no way affect any of the other covenants and restrictions, which shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Developer, as the owner of the Real Estate, has hereunto caused its name to be subscribed this day of , 1993 . Davis Development, L.P. By: Davis Development, Inc. By: C. Richard Davis President -7- STATE OF INDIANA ) )SS: COUNTY OF MARION ) Before me, a Notary Public in and for the State of Indiana, personally appeared C. Richard Davis, the President of Davis Development, Inc. , an Indiana corporation, and acknowledged the execution of this instrument as his voluntary act and deed as such officer on behalf of such corporation for the uses and purposes hereinabove set forth. Witness my signature and Notarial Seal this day of , 1993 . Notary Public Printed My commission expires: I am a resident of County, Indiana. This instrument was prepared by C. Richard Davis, President of Davis Development, Inc. , 3755 East 82nd Street, Suite 120, Indianapolis, Indiana 46240 (317) 595-2900. -8- clz • aws October 5, 1993 DEVELOPMENT, L.P. Director Carmel Department of Community Development One Civic Square Carmel, Indiana 46032 Re: The Greens Dear Director: We understand that the following agreement will be considered as part of our final plat application for the project referred to above: The developer shall be responsible for any drainage problems; including standing water, flooding and faulty erosion control, which arise or become evident at any time during the three year maintenance period after release of subdivision improvement bonds, and which are directly attributable to a deficiency in the subdivision drainage design or the initial construction by the developer of the drainage improvements. This shall include all pipes, structures, swales, ditches and ponds. The responsibility of the developer hereunder shall not, however, include problems which are created subsequent to the completion by the developer of the subdivision improvements , including problems resulting from the improper grading by individual build- ers or structures or improper grading installed or accomplished by individual homeowners or their agents. It is the intent of this requirement that the developer shall, specifically, provide such subsurface drains or storm sewers or ditches as are required to properly rectify any drainage problem or subsurface water problem which was not contemplated in the original approved subdivision design, including disposal of subsurface water from footing drains or individual lots. Davis Development, L.P. , general partner By: Davis Development, Inc. , general partner Chris R. White (1 _ Executive Vice President Witness 10- -9 3 Date 3755 East 82nd Street, Suite 120, Indianapolis, Indiana 46240 (317) 595-2900 FAX (317) 595-2930 clz DEVELOPMENT, L.P. October 5, 1993 Mr. David Cunningham Department of Community Development One Civic Square Carmel, Indiana 46032 Re: Primary Plat The Greens Dear Dave: The above mentioned subdivision is coordinated with the Compre- hensive Plan as follows: Thoroughfare Plan - The proposed project connects with Annaly Downs on the North side and Towne Lakes on the East. The proposed project shall dedicate 50 foot half right of way on West 96th Street and 40 foot half right of way on Shelborne Road per the Thoroughfare Plan. All interior streets shall be 30 feet of pavement with 50 feet of right of way except for cul-de-sacs, which shall have 26 feet of pavement. Stub streets are proposed to the north, and east along existing subdivisions. Sanitary - Sanitary service shall be provided by the Clay Waste District. Sewers presently exist in Towne Lakes Subdivision, Shelborne Road, and Annaly Downs Subdivision. Connection to an offsite Lift Station is proposed along the North Side of West 96th Street. School - Request for services report has been forwarded to Car- mel/Clay Schools. Water - Indianapolis Water Company will supply water service to the project. Drainage - Plans for stormwater management will be prepared by a registered engineer per the Comprehensive Drainage Plan. The maintenance of said drainage system shall be turned over to the Hamilton County Drainage Board. 3755 East 82nd Street, Suite 120, Indianapolis, Indiana 46240 (317) 595-2900 FAX (317) 595-2930 Mr. David Cunningham Page Two October 5, 1993 Please review this information and if you have any questions , please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, ris R. White, P.E. Enclosure clz • DEVELOPMENT, LP. October 5, 1993 Mr. David Cunningham Department of Community Development One Civic Square Carmel, Indiana 46032 Re: The Greens - Utility Report Dear Dave: Water System - The proposed water system for The Greens is intended to provide service to each lot via water mains along the right-of-way of the proposed streets . The system will be primarily an 8 inch main connected to an existing 12 inch at West 96th street and Shelbourne Road. Within the subdivision, 8 inch mains will be internally looped with 6 inch mains serving the proposed cul-de-sacs. Fire hydrants and valves will be provided at locations consistent with the requirements of the Clay Township Fire Department. Water service will be provided by the Indianapolis Water Company. Sanitary Sewer System - The sanitary sewer system for The Greens is intended to provide gravity sewer connection to each lot. Treatment of sanitary waste will be by the Clay Township Regional Waste District. The onsite sewers will be designed and constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Clay Township Regional Waste Dis- trict and the State of Indiana. An average daily flow from this project will be 343 lots at 310 gal . /day ( 106 , 330 GPD) . A sewer allocation will be applied with Clay Township Regional Waste District. The proposed 8 inch PVC sewer will connect at three connection points as follows: ( 1) to the west to the existing 10 inch sewer on Shelborne Road, (2 ) to the east to the existing 8 inch sewer at Towne Lakes and (3) to the south to the existing lift station at 96th Street and Township Line Road. Storm Sewer System - The proposed storm system for The Greens is intended to collect storm water in the conventional fashion utilizing curb inlets, beehive inlets, and manholes. Detention of developed stormwater will be provided in lakes located onsite and within the golf course. The discharge from the detention facilities will be to Crooked Creek and will be in accordance 3755 East 82nd Street, Suite 120, Indianapolis, Indiana 46240 (317) 595-2900 FAX (317) 595-2930 Mr. David Cunningham Page Two October 5, 1993 with local drainage requirements . In general , the developed discharge under 100 year, 24 hour storm conditions will be re- stricted to the peak discharge under predeveloped 10 year 24 hour conditions. If you have any questions, please contact me at 595-2903. Sincerely, Chris R. White, P.E. DRAFT 11-5-93 PLAT COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS THE GREENS The undersigned, DAVIS DEVELOPMENT, L.P. , an Indiana limited partnership (the "Developer") , is the Owner of the real estate more specifically described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto (the "Real Estate") . The Developer is concurrently platting and subdi- viding the Real Estate as shown on the plat for The Greens, which is filed of record , 1993, in the office of the Record- er of Hamilton County, Indiana (the "Plat") and desires in the Plat to subject the Real Estate to the provisions of these Plat Covenants and Restrictions. The subdivision created by the Plat (the "Subdivision") is to be known and designated as "The Greens" . In addition to the covenants and restrictions hereinaf- ter set forth, the Real Estate is also subject to those covenants and restrictions contained in the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of The Greens, dated , 1993 and recorded on , 1993 as Instrument No. , in the office of the Recorder of Hamilton County, Indiana, as the same may be amended or supplemented from time to time as therein provided (the "Declaration") , and to the rights, powers, duties and obligations of the The Greens Community Asso- ciation, Inc. (the "Association") , set forth in the Declaration. If there is any irreconcilable conflict between any of the cove- nants and restrictions contained herein and any of the covenants and restrictions contained in the Declaration, the covenants and restrictions contained in the Declaration shall govern and con- trol, but only to the extent of the irreconcilable conflict, it being the intent hereof that all covenants and restrictions contained herein shall be applicable to the Real Estate to the fullest extent possible. Capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meaning as given in the Declaration. In order to provide adequate protection to all present and future Owners of Lots or Residence Units in the Subdivision, the following covenants and restrictions, in addition to those set forth in the Declaration, are hereby imposed upon the Real Estate: 1. PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. The rights-of-way of the streets as shown on the Plat, if not heretofore dedicated to the public, are hereby dedicated to the public for use as a public right-of- way. 2 . COMMON AREAS. There are areas of ground on the Plat marked "Common Area" . Developer hereby declares, creates and grants a non-exclusive easement in favor of each Owner for the use and enjoyment of the Common Areas, subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the Declaration. 3. UTILITY, DRAINAGE AND SEWER EASEMENTS. There are areas of ground on the Plat marked "Utility Easements, Drainage Easements and Sewer Easements" , either separately or in combination. The Utility Easements are hereby created and reserved for the use of all public utility companies (not including transportation companies) , governmental agencies and the Association for access to and installation, maintenance, repair or removal of poles, mains, ducts, drains, lines, wires, cables and other equipment and facilities for the furnishing of utility services, including cable television services. The Drainage Easements are hereby created and reserved for (i) the use of Developer during the "Development Period" (as such term is defined in the Declaration) for access to and installation, repair or removal of a drainage system, either by surface drainage or appropriate underground installations, for the Real Estate and adjoining property and (ii) the use of the Associa- tion and the Hamilton County Drainage Board for access to and maintenance, repair and replacement of such drainage system. The owner of any Lot in the Subdivision subject to a Drainage Ease- ment, including any builder, shall be required to keep the por- tion of said Drainage Easement on his Lot free from obstructions so that the storm water drainage will be unimpeded and will not be changed or altered without a permit from the Hamilton County Drainage Board and prior written approval of the Developer. The Sewer Easements are hereby created and reserved for the use of the Clay Township Regional Waste District and, during the Devel- opment Period, for the use of Developer for access to and instal- lation, repair, removal replacement or maintenance of an under- ground storm and sanitary sewer system. The delineation of the Utility, Drainage and Sewer Easement areas on the Plat shall not be deemed a limitation on the rights of any entity for whose use any such easement is created and reserved to go on any Lot sub- ject to such easement temporarily to the extent reasonably neces- sary for the exercise of the rights granted to it by this Para- graph 3 . Except as installed by Developer or installed as pro- vided above, no structures or improvements, including without limitation decks, patios, or walkways, shall be erected or main- tained upon said easements. 4. LANDSCAPE EASEMENTS. There are areas of ground on the plat marked "Landscape Easements" which are hereby created and reserved: (i) for the use of the Developer during the Develop- ment Period for access to and the installation, maintenance and replacement of foliage, landscaping, screening materials and other improvements and (ii) for the use of the Association for access to and the installation, maintenance and replacement of foliage, landscaping, screening materials and other improvements. Except as installed by Developer or installed and maintained by the Association or with the prior written consent of the Archi- tectural Review Committee, no structure or improvements, main- tained in or upon said Landscape Easements. 5. ACCESS EASEMENTS. There are areas of ground on the plat -2- marked "Access Easements" . Such Access Easements are hereby created and reserved as non-exclusive easements in favor of each Owner for pedestrian access via sidewalk or other constructed pathway to 6. BUILDING LOCATION - FRONT, BACK AND SIDE YARD REQUIRE- MENTS. Building lines are established on the Plat. No building shall be erected or maintained between said setback lines and the front, rear or side lot line (as the case may be) of a Lot. The setback lines may vary in depth in excess of the minimum as designated on the Plat. Except as otherwise shown on the Plat, the minimum front yard set back shall be Twenty-Five (25) feet. Except as otherwise shown on the Plat, the minimum rear yard setback shall be twenty (20) feet. The minimum side yard set back shall be five (5) feet, with a minimum aggregate side yard between residences of ten (10) feet. 7 . RESIDENTIAL UNIT SIZE AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS. No resi- dence constructed on a Lot shall have less than Twelve Hundred (1200) square feet of total floor area, exclusive of garages, carports and open porches. Each residence Unit shall include an attached two-car (or larger) enclosed garage. The maximum height of any residential dwelling constructed on a lot shall be twenty-five (25) feet measured from finished grade to the underside of the eave line. 8. RESIDENTIAL UNIT USE. All Lots in the Subdivision shall be used solely for residential purposes. No business building shall be erected on any lot, and no business may be conducted on any part thereof. No building shall be erected, placed or per- mitted to remain on any Lot other than one detached single-family residence not to exceed two and a half (2 1/2) stories in height and permanently attached residential accessory buildings. Any garage, tool shed, storage building or any other attached build- ing erected or used as an accessory building to a residence shall be of a permanent type of construction and shall conform to the general architecture and appearance of such residence. 9 . ACCESSORY AND TEMPORARY BUILDINGS. No trailers, shacks, outhouses or detached or unenclosed storage sheds, tool sheds or accessory buildings of any kind shall be erected or situated on any Lot in the Subdivision, except that used by the Developer or by a builder during the construction of a residential building on the property, which temporary construction structures shall be removed upon completion of construction of the Subdivision or building, as the case may be. 10. TEMPORARY RESIDENCE. No trailer, camper, motor home, truck, shack, tent, boat, recreational vehicle, basement, garage or outbuilding may be used at any time as a residence, temporary or permanent; nor may any structure of a temporary character be used as a residence. -3- 11. NUISANCES. No domestic animals raised for commercial purposes and no farm animals or fowl shall be kept or permitted on any Lot. No noxious, unlawful or otherwise offensive activity shall be carried out on any Lot, nor shall anything be done thereon which may be or may become a serious annoyance or nui- sance to the neighborhood. 12 . VEHICLE PARKING. No camper, motor home, truck, trailer, boat, snowmobile or other recreational vehicle of any kind may be stored on any Lot in open public view. No vehicles of any kind may be put up on blocks or jacks to accommodate car repair on a Lot unless such repairs are done in the garage. Disabled vehi- cles shall not be allowed to remain in open public view. 13 . SIGNS. No sign of any kind shall be displayed to the public view on any Lot, except that one sign of not more than six (6) square feet may be displayed at any time for the purpose of advertising a property for sale, and except that Developer and its affiliates and designees may use larger signs during the sale and development of the Subdivision. 14. MAILBOXES. All mailboxes and replacement mailboxes shall be uniform and shall conform to the standards set forth by the Architectural Review Committee. 15. GARBAGE AND REFUSE DISPOSAL. Trash and refuse disposal will be on an individual basis, lot by lot. The community shall not contain dumpsters or other forms of general or common trash accumulation except to facilitate development and house construc- tion. No Lot shall be used or maintained as a dumping ground for trash. Rubbish, garbage and other waste shall be kept in sani- tary containers. All equipment for storage or disposal of such materials shall be kept clean and shall not be stored on any Lot in open public view. No rubbish, garbage or other waste shall be allowed to accumulate on any Lot. No homeowner or occupant of a Lot shall burn or bury any garbage or refuse. All garbage, trash cans and receptacles and woodpiles shall be screened. 16. STORAGE TANKS. No gas, oil or other storage tanks shall be installed on any Lot. 17 . WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE SYSTEMS. No private or semi- private water supply or sewage disposal system may be located upon any Lot. No septic tank, absorption field or similar method of sewage disposal shall be located or constructed on any Lot. **** purposes shall be permitted by these restrictions if other- wise permitted by law and rules and regulations governing the construction or use thereof, however, all proposed uses of geothermal water systems must initially receive approval from the Architectural Committee before being allowed to be constructed. Geothermal heat pumps shall be of the closed loop type only. 18. DITCHES AND SWALES. All owners, including builders, -4- shall keep unobstructed and in good maintenance and repair all open storm water drainage ditches and swales which may be located on their respective Lots. All sump pump discharges shall be connected to a subsurface drain, storm sewer or lake. No drains shall be discharges directly to the ground surface. 19. GARAGES/DRIVEWAYS. Each driveway in the Subdivision shall be of concrete or asphalt material and shall be subject to the approval of the Architectural Review Committee. All garages opening to the street shall have automatic controls. 20. ANTENNA AND SATELLITE DISHES. No outside antennas or satellite dishes shall be permitted in the Subdivision. 21. AWNINGS. No metal, fiberglass, canvas or similar type material awnings or patio covers shall be permitted in the Subdi- vision. 22 . FENCING. No fence shall be erected on or along any Lot line, nor on any Lot, the purposes or result of which will be to obstruct reasonable vision, light or air. All fences shall be kept in good repair and erected so as to enclose the property and decorate the same without unreasonable hindrance or obstruction to any other property. Any fencing permitted to be used in the Subdivision must be wooden or black vinyl coated chain link and shall not be higher than six (6) feet. Uncoated chain link fencing is prohibited. No fencing shall extend forward of the furthest back front corner of the residence. All fencing style, color, location and height shall be generally consistent within the Subdivision and shall be subject to prior written approval of the Architectural Review Committee. 23 . SWIMMING POOLS. No above-ground swimming pools shall permitted in the Subdivision. 24. SOLAR PANELS. No solar heat panels shall be permitted on roofs of any structures in the Subdivision. All such panels shall be enclosed within fenced areas and shall be concealed from the view of neighboring Lots, common areas and the streets. 25. OUTSIDE LIGHTING. Except as otherwise approved by the Developer, all outside lighting contained in or with respect to the Subdivision shall be of an ornamental nature compatible with the architecture of the project and shall provide for projection of light so as not to create a glare, distraction or nuisance to other property owners in the vicinity of or adjacent to the project. All lot owners shall be required to have installed at least one gas or electric "dusk to dawn" yard light in the front yard. Such lights are to be installed by the Developer or Build- er prior to final inspection by the Carmel Department of Communi- ty Development. Al garages opening to the street shall have automatic door controls. -5- 26. SITE OBSTRUCTIONS. No fence, wall, hedge or shrub planting which obstructs sight lines at elevations between two (2) and nine (9) feet above the street shall be placed or permit- ted to remain on any corner lot within the triangular area formed by the street property lines and a line connecting points twenty- five (25) feet from the intersection of said street lines, or in the case of a rounded property corner, from the intersection of the street lines extended. The same sight-line limitations shall apply to any Lot within ten (10) feet from the intersection of a street line with the edge of a driveway pavement or alley line. No tree shall be permitted to remain within such distances of such intersections unless the foliage line is maintained at a sufficient height to prevent obstruction of such sight lines. 27 . BUILDING COMPLETION. Every single-family dwelling, outbuilding, or other structure permitted to be constructed or remain on any lot shall be completed on the exterior within one (1) year from the start of the construction, including at least one (1) coat of paint, stain or varnish on any exterior wood surfaces. All such structures must be completed and the site graded, sodded or seeded and reasonably landscaped within one (1) year from the date of the commencement of construction thereof. During the period of construction of any structure of any lot, the lot shall be kept and maintained in a sightly and orderly manner and no trash or other rubbish shall be permitted to accumu- late unreasonably on any such lot. 28. VIOLATION. Violation or threatened violation of these covenants and restrictions shall be grounds for an action by the Developer, the Association or any person or entity having any right, title or interest in the Real Estate, and all persons or entities claiming under them, against the person or entity vio- lating or threatening to violate any such covenants or restric- tions. Available relief in any such action shall include recov- ery of damages for such violation, injunctive relief against any such violation or threatened violation, declaratory relief and the recovery of costs and attorneys reasonable fees incurred by any party successfully enforcing these covenants and restric- tions; provided, however, that neither the Developer nor the Association shall be liable for damages of any kind to any person for failing to enforce such covenants or restrictions. 29 . CARMEL PLANNING COMMISSION. The Carmel Planning Commis- sion, its successors and assigns shall have no right, power or authority to enforce any covenants, restrictions or other limi- tations contained herein other than those covenants, restrictions or limitations that expressly run in favor of the Carmel Planning Commission; provided that nothing herein shall be construed to prevent the Carmel Planning Commission from enforcing any provi- sions of the Subdivision Control Ordinance, as amended, or any conditions attached to approval of the Plat by the Plat Commit- tee. -6- 30. AMENDMENT. These covenants and restrictions may be amended at any time by the then owners of at least sixty-seven percent (67%) of the Lots in all Subdivisions which are now or hereafter made subject to and annexed to the Declaration; provid- ed, however, that until all of the Lots in such Subdivisions have been sold by Developer, any such amendment shall require the prior written approval of Developer. Each such amendment shall be evidenced by a written instrument, signed by the Owner or Owners concurring therein, which instrument shall set forth facts sufficient to indicate compliance with this paragraph and shall be recorded in the office of the Recorder of Hamilton County, Indiana. No amendment which adversely affects the rights of a public utility shall be effective with respect to such public utility without its written consent thereto. No amendment which is contrary to a zoning commitment shall be effective without the written approval of the affected adjacent homeowners associations designated by the City of Carmel. 31. TERM. The foregoing plat covenants and restrictions, as the same may be amended from time to time, shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all persons or entities from time to time having any right, title or interest in the Real Estate and on all persons or entities claiming under them, until Decem- ber 31, 2012, and thereafter they shall continue automatically in effect unless terminated by a vote of a majority of the then Owners of the Lots in the Subdivision; provided, however, that no termination of said these covenants and restrictions shall affect any easement hereby created and reserved unless all persons entitled to the beneficial use of such easement shall have con- sented thereto in writing. 32 . SEVERABILITY. Invalidation of any of the foregoing covenants or restrictions by judgment or court order shall in no way affect any of the other covenants and restrictions, which shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Developer, as the owner of the Real Estate, has hereunto caused its name to be subscribed this day of , 1993 . Davis Development, L.P. By: Davis Development, Inc. By: C. Richard Davis President -7- STATE OF INDIANA ) )SS: COUNTY OF MARION ) Before me, a Notary Public in and for the State of Indiana, personally appeared C. Richard Davis, the President of Davis Development, Inc. , an Indiana corporation, and acknowledged the execution of this instrument as his voluntary act and deed as such officer on behalf of such corporation for the uses and purposes hereinabove set forth. Witness my signature and Notarial Seal this day of , 1993 . Notary Public Printed My commission expires: I am a resident of County, Indiana. This instrument was prepared by C. Richard Davis, President of Davis Development, Inc. , 3755 East 82nd Street, Suite 120, Indianapolis, Indiana 46240 (317) 595-2900. -8- NELSON FRANKENBERGER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW 3021 EAST 98TH STREET JAMES J. NELSON 220 CHARLES D. FRANKENBERGER SUITE INDIANAOLIS, INDIANA 46280 JANET WOLF SWISS 317-844-0106 OF COUNSEL FAX.317-846-8782 JANE B. MERRILL December 8, 1993 Mr. Dave Cunningham Department of Community Development One Civic Square Carmel, Indiana 46032 Re: Davis Development/The Greens/Application for Primary Plat Dear Dave: Enclosed for your review and file is a copy of the Transportation Impact Analysis for the Davis Development subdivision to the known as "The Greens", which was prepared by Pflum, Klausmeier and Gehrum. If you should have any questions following your review, please contact me. Kindest regards, NELSON & FRANKENBERGER Ja - "- on JJN/bg Enclosure I I r I TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS THE GREENS 96th Street and Shelborne Road ' Hamilton County, Indiana Prepared For: DAVIS DEVELOPMENT L. P. Indianapolis, Indiana Prepared By: PFLUM, KLAUSMEIER & GEHRUM CONSULTANTS 47 South Pennsylvania Street - 9th Floor Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-3622 Cincinnati, OH Hudson, OH December, 1993 I TABLE OF CONTENTS Description Page No. INTRODUCTION 1 DESCRIPTION OF SITE 1 EXISTING ROADWAY FACILITIES 1 Shelborne Road 2 96th Street 2 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LOS RATINGS 2 — SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC AND DISTRIBUTION 3 OTHER AREA DEVELOPMENT 4 FUTURE LOS RATINGS 4 RECOMMENDATIONS 5 CONCLUSION 6 LIST OF TABLES — Table 1 Level of Service Ratings - Existing Traffic 3 Table 2 Traffic Generation Estimates 3 _ Table 3 Levels of Service 4 Table 4 Access Drives LOS Ratings 5 Figures 1 thru 15 — TECHNICAL APPENDIX 2010 R-31/11 I p TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS THE GREENS HAMILTON COUNTY, INDIANA I I INTRODUCTION The purpose of this summary report is to present the findings of a Transportation Impact Study which has been completed for Davis Development L.P. with respect to a proposed r residential development to be known as The Greens. The Greens is to be located on property which generally surrounds Twin Lakes Country Club and Golf Course in southwestern Hamilton County and is shown in Figure 1. The Greens will include approximately 336 homesites on nearly 141 acres for a gross density of 2.38 homes per acre. This development is expected to generate enough vehicle trip ends to qualify for a full Transportation Impact Study as described in the Applicants Guide for Transportation Impact Studies for Proposed Development, adopted by Carmel Plan Commission Resolution No. 021892 on 18 February 1992. Pursuant to the Guidelines, the City of Carmel Department of Community Development directed that the traffic impacts on four specific intersections be analyzed: 96th Street and Shelborne Road 96th Street and Township Line Road 106th Street and Shelborne Road 106th Street and Township Line Road. This Impact Study is in full compliance with the Applicants Guide and DOC directions. DESCRIPTION OF SITE The preliminary site plan for The Greens, shown in Figure 2, is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for this area. The plan takes advantage of the country club and golf course setting and incorporates sidewalks and common recreational facilities for use by the residents. An internal street system provides for good traffic circulation through the community and connects it to Shelborne Road and 96th Street. Stub streets will enable the internal roads to be connected with adjacent parcels that are not yet developed. EXISTING ROADWAY FACILITIES The site is bounded by Shelborne Road on the west and 96th Street on the south as described in subsequent paragraphs. - 1 - I I Shelborne Road Shelborne Road, adjacent to the site, is a narrow, two-lane, north/south roadway with no defined shoulders. The lane widths vary slightly between 10 and 10i feet per lane. Shelborne Road "Tees" into 96th Street from the north with a private driveway forming the fourth leg of this intersection on the south. Therefore, southbound traffic approaching 96th Street on Shelborne Road is controlled by a STOP sign. Traffic on 96th Street does not stop. The posted speed limit on Shelborne Road is 35 MPH between 96th Street and 106th Street. Shelborne Road is classified as a collector on the existing Carmel/Clay Thoroughfare Plan. As such, a total 80' of Right-of-Way width is desired. 96th Street Resurfacing has recently been completed on 96th Street in this area. Two lanes, each 11 feet wide are available for traffic. A narrow, crushed stone shoulder also exists along 96th Street in this area. Many businesses and residences are located along 96th Street. The posted speed limit is 40 MPH in this area. The Thoroughfare Plan classifies 96th Street as a Secondary Arterial with a recommended 90' Right-of-Way. EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LOS RATINGS Existing traffic counts were provided by the City of Carmel for the area. These counts were recorded in May, 1992 by a private consultant. Additional traffic counts recorded in 1993 for the intersection of 106th Street and Shelborne Road, and included in the Traffic Operations Analysis report for the proposed Huntersfield subdivision, were also reviewed. A comparison between the two revealed a very close correlation between the two. Therefore, for the purposes of this report, the 1992 traffic volumes were used as existing traffic. Figures 3 and 4 provide existing conditions and peak hour traffic volumes at the four intersections identified below: 1. 96th Street and Shelborne Road 2. 96th Street and Township Line Road 3. 106th Street and Shelborne Road 4. 106th Street and Township Line Road. Capacity analyses were performed for the intersection of 96th Street and Shelborne Road for the AM and PM peak hours utilizing the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) program associated with the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), Special Report 209 as published by the Transportation Research Board. The other three intersections '— were compared to Table 10-7 from page 10-14 in the HCM. That Table provides an estimated total volume of vehicles that can enter four way stop intersections at a LOS C rating. When the total entering volumes are below those shown in Table 10-7 for the appropriate distribution, a LOS C+ is designated for the intersection. When the volumes exceed the Table volumes, a LOS C- designation is given. Table 1 provides the existing LOS ratings for these four intersections. - 2 - TABLE 1 — Level of Service Ratings Existing Traffic Intersection AM Peak Hr. PM Peak Hr. — 96th St. & Shelborne Road C or Better C or Better 96th St. and Township Line Road C+ C+ 106th St. and Shelborne Road C+ C+ 106th Street and Township Line Road C+ C+ Computer summary sheets and a copy of HCM page 10-14 are included in the Technical Summary. SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC AND DISTRIBUTION The trip generation characteristics for The Greens and other undeveloped parcels have been estimated by the methods as set forth in the 5th Edition of Trip Generation from — the Institute of Transportation Engineers. The estimates are shown in the Technical Appendix and summarized in Table 2. — TABLE 2 Traffic Generation Estimates — AM Peak PM Peak Daily Description InOut In Out In Out — The Greens (336 Homes) 60 171 209 113 1575 1575 34 Acres (82 Homes) 18 52 59 31 430 430 55 Acres (132 Homes) 27 76 90 49 667 667 30 Acres (72 Homes) 16 45 52 28 381 381 — 35 Acres (84 Homes) 18 51 60 32 440 440 TOTAL 139 395 470 253 3493 3493 Distribution patterns for development projects with site plans can be reasonably deduced when a review is completed of the existing roadway network and the obvious typical _ destinations. When dealing with vacant parcels and no site plans, the distribution patterns are less specific. For the purposes of this report, distribution patterns for the four vacant parcels have been generalized as anticipated volumes at the four existing intersections included in this study. Figure 5 provides the anticipated AM and PM -' peak hour volumes at the major drives for The Greens. - 3 - OTHER AREA DEVELOPMENT Other recent development projects in the area that have either been approved or are in the process of being approved include Spring Arbor subdivision, Ashbrooke subdivision — and Huntersfield subdivision. Traffic Impact Studies previously prepared provided traffic forecasts for the Spring Arbor and Huntersfield subdivisions. Ashbrooke is nearly developed and its traffic is included in recent counts. — Existing traffic was increased at a rate of 2.5% compounded annually for ten years to account for other development. FUTURE LOS RATINGS Figures 6 and 7 provide the traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hours at the four intersections that is only associated with a 2.5% increase per year of the existing traffic for a 10 year period. Figures 8 and 9 provide the traffic volumes that are anticipated to be generated by The Greens for the AM and PM peak hours at the four intersections superimposed on the existing traffic. Figures 10 and 11 provide the anticipated traffic volumes associated with the Spring Arbor and Huntersfield subdivisions and the four vacant parcels in the area for the AM and PM peak hours at the four intersections. — Figures 12 and 13 summarize all the AM and PM peak hour volumes anticipated for the future including the background growth, The Greens subdivision, Spring Arbor subdivision, Huntersfield subdivision and the four vacant parcels. The LOS at each of the four intersections was then determined for various traffic volume conditions to determine the separate impacts due to increases of background traffic, The Greens traffic, and traffic of other nearby developments. The results of the LOS analyses are in the Technical Appendix and are summarized in Table 3. TABLE 3 Levels of Service _.,, AM Peak Hour Traffic Shelborne Road at: Township Line Rd. at: Condition 96th 106th 96th 106th E See I Below C+ C+ C+ E+BG See II Below C+ C- C+ E+GRN See II Below C+ C- C+ E+BG+GRN+Oth. See V Below C+ C- C- PM Peak Hour Traffic She l borne Road at: Township Line Road at: Condition 96th 106th 96th 106th — E See I Below C+ C+ C+ E+BG See III Below C+ C- C+ E+GRN See IV Below C+ C- C+ — E+BG+GRN+Oth. See VI Below C+ C- C+ Note: E denotes existing traffic — BG denotes background traffic GRN denotes The Greens traffic Oth. denotes other traffic - 4 - Note: I All movements are C or better II Northbound left is D; all other movements are C or better III Northbound left is E - Northbound thru; Southbound left and thru are D; all others are A IV Northbound left and thru; Southbound left and thru are D; all others are A V Northbound left is E; Northbound thru; Southbound left and thru are C or better VI Northbound left and thru; Southbound left and thru are E; all others are B or better. Table 4 provides the anticipated LOS ratings for the proposed access drives from the site to 96th Street and Shelborne Road. TABLE 4 Access Drives LOS Ratings Future LOS Ratings Intersection AM Peak PM Peak Inverness Drive at 96th Street See I Below See II Below Inverness Dr. at Shelborne Rd. All movements - A All movements - A Augusta Dr. at Shelborne Rd. All movements - A All movements - A I Southbound left turn is D; all others are A II Southbound left turn is E; all others are A This analysis points to the fact that future 96th Street traffic volumes will cause difficulty for anyone who wishes to turn left from 96th Street or turn left onto 96th Street from any drive during peak hours. With the exception of the PM peak hour at 106th Street and Shelborne Road, the intersections that show poor LOS ratings are on 96th Street. This indicates that some improvements will be warranted in the future to address these needs. RECOMMENDATIONS 96th Street carries traffic volumes in excess of 9,700 vehicles per day. During peak periods, volumes exceed 500 vehicles per hour per lane. Volumes along 96th Street will increase in part due to this proposed development. To a greater extent, volumes along 96th Street will increase because of the service it provides to cross-county trips and to trips which originate in or are destined to business and commercial establishments nearby. - 5 - 96th Street is a two-lane 22' wide roadway in good condition. The posted speed limit is 40 miles per hour. Developments along either side of 96th Street have resulted in the construction of acceleration and deceleration lanes for vehicles turning right into and out of driveways. As a result, an uncoordinated series of tapers exists along the roadway edges. Meanwhile, left turning vehicles are unprotected from traffic approaching them from behind as they await safe gaps in oncoming traffic. Oncoming traffic delays both the vehicles which are waiting to turn left as well as the vehicles which are blocked behind them. Left turning vehicles therefore cause both safety and congestion problems more serious than do right turning vehicles. Traffic projections for The Greens indicate that sufficient volumes will justify left turn lanes from 96th Street both at the site roadway which intersects 96th Street and at the intersection of Shelborne Road and 96th Street. It is therefore recommended that these two intersections be improved, with the cooperation of the County, as shown by Figures 11 and 12. The recommendations call for the widening of 96th Street by seven feet on each side to create a 36' wide pavement through the intersections. This width will enable opposing left turn lanes to be installed at each intersections. Figure 14 illustrates the intersection of the proposed Inverness Drive with 96th Street. About 300' of widening (including tapers) is required along 96th Street on either side of the proposed intersection. The tapers are designed for 40 MPH speeds along 96th Street. Figure 15 illustrates the proposed improvements at Shelborne Road and 96th Street. The widened section should be extended eastwardly from the intersection to enable — opposing left turn lanes to be installed at nearby driveways. North of 96th Street, Shelborne Road should be improved and widened to 24' as it approaches 96th Street. It is recommended that Inverness Drive as it intersects with Shelborne Drive, be relocated south to align with the access drive into Ashbrooke subdivision. This will create a standard four legged intersection. It is recommended that 45 feet of Right-of-Way be dedicated along the north side of 96th Street and 40' of Right-of-Way is dedicated along the east side of Shelborne Road to accommodate the Comprehensive Plan. CONCLUSION It should be noted here that the increase in background traffic has more impact on the roadway network than any individual development identified and included in this study. In particular, the normal growth of traffic affects the intersection LOS ratings more than The Greens for all locations. Recognizing however, that each development adds incrementally to the background traffic growth, some roadway improvements have been recommended which will benefit all motorists in the area. I I In particular, geometric improvements are recommended for 96th Street at Shelborne Road in lieu of altering the traffic control devices. The anticipated traffic volumes do not warrant the installation of a traffic signal at this location as there is not a constant level necessary to fulfill the minimum requirements. Also changing the two way stop condition to an all stop condition does not appear to be justified due to the "— distribution patterns existing today. Four way stops would be considered when the traffic volumes are equally split or at most a 60% to 40% split. Changing the existing two way stop condition to a four way stop would increase delays on 96th Street and -- create long queues during peak hours. The recommendations that are included in this report will mitigate the impact of the additional traffic due to The Greens. - 7 - 2010/R-30/11 /+N. ,P Nw.lo6tn St. II ' 0 II .,,.. \� `` `\\\` N Z \ N. Ir. m 0 �: UIli ' V 0 w v o THE GREEN'S zIJ o a� O m lx 4 • W.96th St. 1 Nri'l\ I j____)\ \ '-?.1 ) 1 iI U.S.52/421 i MI0 ---L4I11 II 1111 M IFl OTHER (VACANT) PARCELS I I I FIGURE GENERAL LOCATION MAP II I — IN4H I 1 JRIMAE M RIVIRE ID, THE S E '.9 � I� i '' ~ w •I wI wI wi F I. . wx VIO t •i, `! •,`re , ' ;..r - ! •t\tlr , ",e.,;;—;;;;; ;; ------ ., V.• ;; r r •rest - GREEN'Su i�0 �tk • � w w 1 ' n a r w �c �`} Y IFNs I1ew&r1 41 IP. • THE .,,-,,,,,o-0 A.911110001 * , . • J t":„. f, w. . = ESTATES d 14 i •, Y•. . : ll I. Sl Ir E,I •j ;i f I 1 St , 1 !! 1 I . 'til ey 14 r ...• �1 c-•— I ... . d ° • 3..y;<. w 71 1•I /tw/... .wl ass am wl 06 10 �� 111 I dTY • , IT w�f / \ 1 .• ?t y a �j, 0) N 'Q.UB fw a Vw w w' m ti Q Y f= t i?d. ,,k, AND ' COURSE : w "n,e " � www\ 11 '4� I d t *. ,. Sr E• uE '( w ri Y5 i Y-�.. w M w fw THE _ t ,. 1 i � 1< VILLAGES 4 , , 5' I I W:{ f ,,ev a-i rl MUG MOOR '1'I �► ?�t' d y^ �'\ ...,. G� ' - ` w anontao• ` 1 y ' • � ;di rwr■ , i fr.4„ t .< „:, •, IIr �� • ' Iw '- ("� GHEN AEE a RY 9 ` { wJ .• . r .��, ., -�i Z/']� ar Apo si,eomworti�� CJ 0 .,.;3 u ,31r,:\ ...i•iw' �,S •`,,1 1 :i 14 Q O / .• .. r . •"'1"I-1'*� fl CI 4. k4 r :Al r* le r> > alk �:: 0 • ��wwr! es �•7 1!ICI COI r & 0 *1 Q Q G3 1 N t3 airy. �� cs a THE S K O ,,� ` ,� .< . 1 r,l��` MANORS �n e P Q Q o q a 4 0, ‘42�Q r', . tr p C7 CJ ...r._ WEST 96th SIREET ri FIGURE 2 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN N tD 0) co CO.19 411110h 10' a - STOP II (8) 210 (148) STOP 16 (19) I T 106th St. o_ 9 (29) STOP z 135 (156) —s o LL 2 (6) STOP J W 2 O 10.5' 10.5' a T lD M a CO L0 N p Cl" M M M N 01 O d' O 1 (1) STOP 411 (376) r 2 (2) f 96th St. w 26 (135) 305 (477)--> STOP I (i) 10' 10' FIGURE 3 I ( EXISTING GEOMETRICS and PEAK HOUR VOLUMES AM (PM) r- N N Is- 0 O r- f Ilk, STOP 'T E— 254 (206) STOP 1� i 0 7 106th St. 0 t J w -: _z STOP 220 (188) -- I STOP N z 0 ►- 10' 10' T r Mft) 3 N N N cr N a) m J c 611111111N lir 35 mph STOP 4- 258 (254) 40 mph STOP I 96th St. w - . z } k STOP = I- STOP 325 (506) T o i- 10' lo' Io', FIGURE 4 EXISTING GEOMETRICS and PEAK HOUR VOLUMES AM (PM) d' 0) to al INVERNESS Dr. L c,..._ i n WO II A USIA 0 THE GREEN'S )1111 ..,—,i -co ii w L*0 2 cx 0 J z H til Z ___ ct 4, = o __ .; > I4 h St"� 15 (26) (25) 16 (33) V '0`— I (I) } r 33 (6) _ v-33 (6) 10(58) 1 (1) (7 \..._______ iI cr to to FIGURE 5 ANTICIPATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES Primary Drives Only AM (PM) — N � 51 IV. cr Nit P/110. 10 10' STOP 14 (10) 269 (189) STOP 20 (24) 106th St. K � 12 (37) STOP z 173 (200) 00 STOP 3 (e) J 10.5' 10.5' T ( N pv- N O co 42 2 (2) STOP t-526 (481) r 3 (3) 96th St. — r cr w 33 (173) o 390(6(I) —� 2 (2) = STOP 10' 10' FIGURE 6 fi ANTICIPATED N N N PEAK HOUR VOLUMES N N N DUE TO BACKGROUND GROWTH m N N. M_ r--,,..--1 Al 1 10 It, STOP t\--} TT -(---- 325 (264) STOP o_ 106th St. 0 } w z STOP -?---1282 (241) _� n. u T STOP z z 3 0 F- 10' 10' T m 0) N N M) lD to N d' M N 1101, 35 mph STOP .F— 330 (325) 40 mph STOP i r 96th St. W z �' } STOP z 416 (648) 3 STOP o t- 10' 10' 10' FIGURE 7 ._( ANTICIPATED N PEAK HOUR VOLUMES M DUE TO BACKGROUND GROWTH co (00 = .�C JO. 10' /\\ STOP 11 (8) X210 (148) STOP 24 (24) o_ 106th St. cc k 9 (29) STOP z a 135 (156) 12 (19) STOP 10.5' 105' T r Fr-) c t: 0 .6 IC) N co OJ o to 12 4 (15) STOP E— 458(394) r 2 (2) —rr 96th St. — v — r 34 (215) w En 315 (535) —> 1 (11 = STOP 10' 10' FIGURE 8 ANTICIPATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES FOR EXISTING PLUS THE GREEN'S N M N Q) _o )Tc S li, STOP -r-------- 262 (211) ----2 i ,..:TOP r o_ 106th St. 0 w z STOP 223 (20 —� a. u \U = STOP z z 3 0 F- 10' 10' 1 � T //7'y I 1 t0 Q1 M N N to cr 0) Q) N • ) if c di*hi\ IV 35 mph STOP .irc---- 273 (286) 40 mph STOP ....„.2 :,-.:1 96th St. w z k �' STOP 360 (537) 3u-, ,...77: STOP o F- 10' 10' FIGURE 9 t 7 ANTICIPATED N PEAK HOUR VOLUMES FOR EXISTING M PLUS THE GREEN'S O N O N 10' 10' %1, STOP 3 (I) 'T F— 72(417) STOP 2 (3) O T 106th St. k cr 0 (0) STOP z 27(57)—a 0 0° 6(4) STOP --i (Li cn 10.5' 10.5' t O O N tD N 0 ti ON O 0) .Z9 444, 4 (8) STOP �- 63 (48) r 0 (0) 96th St. 4 (401 20 (103)—> 0 (0)- I STOP Io' lo', FIGURE 10 I ANTICIPATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 0 0 0 DUE TO OTHER 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT and VACANT PARCELS AM (PM) ►� 01 O M N ) AdKO 1k, STOP 0 (0) E 6 (31) OP v.- 9 (31) T' 106th St. o_ r � w 2 (I) STOP -� 27 (13)---)1- 11 (21) N. z STOP 0 I- 10' lo' t r 3 O M tD ct 61.11%, 35 mph STOP 13 (31) 40 mph E'— 9 (13) STOP 0 (0) 1 96th St. - w - � TOP 15 )} S 19 (12) STOP 0 (0) F 10' 10'A FIGURE I tANTICIPATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES tD o DUE TO OTHER o CO 0 DEVELOPMENT and VACANT PARCELS AM (PM) () w y to ) 1:10. 10'-._10' %PP STOP 17 (I I) E-- 341 (236) STOP 30(32) 106th St. 0 cc12 (37)-A STOP z 200(257)---10. o �. 0° STOP 19 (25) --i w 10.5' 10.5' r a) a) d. N M N N Cr N M 9 (24) STOP ""*-- 636(547) 3 (3) 96th St. — r 45 (29 420(772)—> m 2 (2) - ' STOP 10' 10' FIGURE 12 TOTAL ANTICIPATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES N N N for DESIGN YEAR N N N AM (PM) W to O co N ) 1 AeliII"Ph, 1. STOP E 348 (331) ___..........01,71" STOP 0 T 106th St. 0 z z STOP -1 325 (2951 = STOP z z 0 10' 10' T r is: m to 0 r co 0 0 ti v it y T' 10 35 mph STOP 4- 367 (401) 404 mph STOP i =1 96th St. w =r z STOP VI STOP = _485 (764) z STOP ,--- 1 o Io' lo' FIGURE 13 TOTAL ANTICIPATED � PEAK HOUR VOLUMES IEF for DESIGN YEAR to AM (PM) N to Z 0 1 0 I W od frWI— I W > W 1 • Zfr i* - t- j p U) (I) I 0 rc 1 0 - (W &) /J W - b � 10 W W 0 Z W I / 0 CC et I IILI Lal 4- (9 D o ••• "CI C I LI _ Cr � � Li. CL =--• O N 1 01 O--- I r 111 b I Mr JI n AI / I I 1 1 / 1 I I 3AIUO SS3N83ANI I n I \ i I 1 I 1 o I U b I 0 I 1, I n X I5 I n a a 9 / 1 I 2 $ $ I 101 W Way I I -J I 1 / I I I .0 4 10 1 o n. I I 0 I I 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I I I zI- 0 1 r U -c.6- W 1 11 (nom cc I I i,1 W -C) I I it F-- c 1 , 0 Z c3 1 I W 1 I a, 1^ CIZ 1 1 W =/ W W 1 1in I n_ W O co 1I D O W a '/I \1/4 1\ cc 3 LL CL 0 >-- — - > W/111> lr_ - - O o / U It \ ak D- - U \ \_ III I I I I I I I o 1 9 I I I I 1 l t I I 1 b I 11 n I 1 OVOel 3N2JOU13HS 1 \ / AV1f13Al2J0 I 1 V1 0 I ,n I rc I J I I- I 1 III IW I i 1 o 8 1 , 1 1I 01 i a as 9, 1 d I 4 - 0 o IaI zt I 1 J I 1 I 1 1 iI ' I 1 1 1 / I m i 0 I $ )- I I 1 3 1 1 • 1 I 1 ,, I II II N 111 TECHNICAL APPENDIX ,,Lli ...._._ .... . - 4 � r 414 ,(..,- ' 4 it e, ... ... • , , 1. 1 .• _ ....„,...... -, ,,,- r....."....... 041 v., ........2..a4....,4"..... - 4111 I k • 0 .t.--- , _ ,IL . • i / ......, ;10 „ . 416 ''', '''."' . �1 may^ TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES THE GREEN DEVELOPMENT 336 Homesites DAILY Page 251 Ln (T) = 0.921 Ln (x) + 2.698 Ln (T) = 0.921 Ln (336) + 2.698 Ln (T) = 8.056 T = 3150 Trips — 1575 In 1575 Out AM PEAK Page 259 Ln (T) = 0.867 Ln (x) + 0.398 Ln (T) = 0.867 Ln (336) + 0.398 Ln (T) = 5.441 — T = 231 Trips 26% enter = 60 In 74% exit = 171 Out PM PEAK Page 261 Ln (T) = 0.902 Ln (x) + 0.528 Ln (T) = 0.902 Ln (336) + 0.528 — Ln (T) = 5.775 T = 322 Trips 65% enter = 209 In ,_ 35% exit = 113 Out 2010/R-30/09 TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES OTHER VACANT PARCELS Daily AM Peak PM Peak .- 82 Homes 82 Homes 82 Homes Ln(T) = 0.921 Ln(82)+2.698 Ln(T) = 0.867 Ln(82)+0.398 Ln(T) = 0.902 Ln(82)+0.528 Ln(T) = 6.756 Ln(T) = 4.219 Ln(T) = 4.503 - T = 860 Trips T = 70 Trips T = 90 Trips 430 In 26% enter = 18 In 65% enter = 59 In 430 Out 64% exit = 52 Out 35% exit = 31 Out 132 Homes 132 Homes 132 Homes Ln(T) = 0.921 Ln(132)+2.698 Ln(T) = 0.867 Ln(132)+0.398 Ln(T) = 0.902 Ln(132)+0.528 - Ln(T) = 7.195 Ln(T) = 4.631 Ln(T) = 4.93 T = 1334 Trips T = 103 Trips T = 139 Trips 667 In 27 In 90 In 667 Out 76 Out 49 Out 72 Homes 72 Homes 72 Homes - Ln(T) = 0.921 Ln(72)+2.698 Ln(T) = 0.867 Ln(72)+0.398 Ln(T) = 0.902 Ln(72)+0.528 Ln(T) = 6.637 Ln(T) = 4.106 Ln(T) = 4.386 T = 762 Trips T = 61 Trips T = 80 Trips 381 In 16 In 52 In - 381 Out 45 Out 28 Out - 84 Homes 84 Homes 84 Homes Ln(T) = 0.921 Ln(84)+2.698 Ln(T) = 0.867 Ln(84)+0.398 Ln(T) = 0.902 Ln(84)+0.528 Ln(T) = 6.779 Ln(T) = 4.239 Ln(T) = 4.525 - T = 880 Trips T = 69 Trips T = 92 Trips 440 In 18 In 60 In 440 Out 51 Out 32 Out 2010/R-30/10 10-14 URBAN STREETS The number of approach lanes also affects the capacity Of TABLE 10-6. CAPACITY OF FOUR-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED multiway STOP-controlled intersections. Simultaneous move- INTERSECTIONS WITH 50/50 DEMAND SPLIT FOR VARIOUS ments from a two-lane approach can occur,increasing the over- APPROACH WIDTHS '� all capacity. Table 10-6 shows the capacity of four-way STOP- controlled intersections with a 50/50 demand split for a range CAPACITY' of approach lane configurations. INTERSECTION TYPE (vrn) Table 10-7 gives volume levels which can be accommodated 2-lane by 2-lane 1,900 at four-way sTop-controlled intersections under reasonable op- 2-lane by 4-lane 2,800 4-lane by 4-lane 3,600 erating conditions. Although levels of service for such intersec- lions are not s ecificall defined Table 10-7 volumes are ental capacity,all legs. p y , SOURCE:Ref.9 °-- approximately indicative of LOS C. TABLE 10-7. APPROXIMATE LEVEL-OF-SERVICE C SERVICE TABLE 10-5. CAPACITY OF A TWO-BY-TWO LANE FOUR-WAY VOLUMES FOR FOUR-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSEC- STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTION FOR VARIOUS DEMAND TIONS SPLITS LOS C SERVICE VOLUME,VPII CAPACITY° NUMBER OF LANES — DEMAND SPLIT (VPII) DEMAND SPLIT 2 BY 2 2 BY 4 4 BY 4 50/50 1,900 55/45 1,800 50/50 1,200 1,800 2,200 60/40 1,700 55/45 1,140 1,720 2,070 -- 65/35 1,600 60/40 1,080 1,660 1,970 70/30 1,500 65/35 1,010 1,630 1,880 70/30 960 1,610 1,820 °Total capacity,all legs. SOURCE:Ref.9 SOURCE:Ref./0 won IV. SAMPLE CALCULATIONS CALCULATION 1—A T-INTERSECTION 2. Since no classification of vehicles is given,nor is any grade — present, volumes 4, 7, and 9 (which must be adjusted) arc 1. Description—This example concerns the intersection of multiplied by 1.1 to reflect normal traffic compositicn. The Market Street with Jones Street, which is located in an urban adjusted volumes are entered on the upper-right diagram for area with a population of 100,000. Market Street is a two-lane easy reference in later computational steps. collector, and Jones Street is a two-lane local street serving a 3. The RT from the minor street is the first movement con- residential development. It is controlled with a STOP sign.There sidered. The conflicting volume is computed as one-half the is no widening in the vicinity of the intersection, and corner major street right-turn volume, plus the through volume with radii are 20 ft. The intersection is depicted in Figure 10-8. which the minor street RT will merge. The conflicting traffic Residents of the area have complained that there is substantial is thus found to be 270 vph. delay experienced in the late afternoon turning right into Market The critical gap is selected from Table 10-2 for an RT from Street. They claim that this is due to the need for right and left minor street,two-lanes on the major street,and prevailing speed 'NW turners to share a lane, and have requested that a right-turn- of 30 mph. The critical gap is found to be 5.5 sec. There are only lane be provided. no conditions which would allow adjusting this critical gap. 2. Solution—The T-intersection worksheet will be used for ... summarizing and organizing computations concerning this problem. The problem is to evaluate whether or not the re- quested improvement will achieve any reasonable reduction in the delay experienced by local residents traversing this location. The computations on the worksheet (Figure 10-8) are de- scribed and discussed below: 1. Existing peak hour volumes for the afternoon period were '— collected, and are summarized as indicated on the upper-left diagram. The approach speed of major street traffic was also observed, and found to be 30 mph. -~ -~ 1985 HEM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ~~ ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ ~ - AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 40 ~~ PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000000 — NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . 96TH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . SHELBORNE ROAD — NAME OF THE ANALYST T. FORD ~~ DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) 11/24/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED . . . . AM PEAK — OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING TRAFFIC AND GEOMETRIES INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL — _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG — MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN _ CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN — TRAFFIC VOLUMES -------_______-- --___________________________________________________ — ED WB NB SB ____ ____ ____ ____ LEFT 26 2 1 14 — THRU 305 411 1 1 RIGHT 1 1 1 109 ~~ NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE — ___________________________________________________________________ _ EB WB NB SB _______ _______ _______ ~~ LANES 1 1 1 1 LANE USAGE LTR LTR ~~ . ^� ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 _____________________________________________________________________ ~~ PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ______ ~~ EASTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N ~~ NORTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION ~~ % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV 'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 -~ CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS NB 5. 90 5. 40 0. 00 5. 40 SB 5. 90 5. 40 0. 00 5. 40 ~~ MAJOR LEFTS ED 5. 20 4. 70 0. 00 4. 70 WB 5. 20 4. 70 0.00 4. 70 MINOR THROUGHS NB 6. 60 6. 10 0. 00 6. 10 SB 6. 60 6. 10 0. 00 6. 10 MINOR LEFTS ~� NB 7. L0 6. 60 0. 00 6. 60 SB 7. 10 6. 60 0. 00 6. 60 ~~ IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . 96TH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . SHELBORNE ROAD ~~ DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 11/24/93 ; AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING TRAFFIC AND GEOMETRICS _ _ CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 ~~ --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE — RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH — MINOR STREET _ NB LEFT 1 261 223 > 223 > 222 > C THROUGH 1 363 354 > 350 354 > 346 353 >B B RIGHT 1 790 79O > 790 > 789 > A — MINOR STREET — SB LEFT 16 308 300 > 300 > 284 > C THROUGH 1 363 354 > 601 354 > 457 353 >A B RIGHT 126 694 694 > 694 > 568 > A ~~ MAJOR STREET ED LEFT 30 829 829 829 799 A — WB LEFT 2 932 932 932 930 A ~~ IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ ~~ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . 96TH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . SHELBORNE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 11/24/93 ; AM PEAK — OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING TRAFFIC AND GEOMETRIES ~~ ~~ ~~ -~ — — 198'3 HEM: UNSIGNALIIED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 .* .* . u.# ••x; ** •x•******** E•*-lE*;;.sj.* .** *#.**S ****#*####* •* ****# 'rdh**3£•aF•?F•Y:if* . IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 40 — PEAK HOUR FACTOR . , . .. , .. . 9J AREA POPULATION .. .• 1000000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET96TH STREET NAME. OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET 'SHELDORNE ROAD — NAME OF THE ANALYST". ., ., . . . . T. FORD DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . ,. . . 11/24/9: TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. ,, PM PEAK — OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXIS-IING TRAFFIC AND GEOMETR I CS INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4—LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST — CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ED WB ND SB LEFT 135 2 1 4 i THRU 305 376 1 C) — RIGHT 1 1 1 23 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE EB WB NB SD LANES 1 1 1 1 — LANE USAGE LTR LTR - -- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 - PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS _________________ ~~ EASTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N - NORTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N ~~ VEHICLE COMPOSITION - % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV 'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ___________ _____________ _____________ - EASTBOUND 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 ~~ NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 - CRITICAL GAPS ______________________ ____ _____________________________________ ~~ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ____ ____________ ~~ MINOR RIGHTS NB 5. 90 5. 40 0. 00 5. 40 SB 5. 90 5. 40 0. 00 5. 40 ~~ MAJOR LEFTS ED 5. 20 4. 70 0. 00 4. 70 - WB 5. 20 4. 70 0. 00 4. 70 MINOR THROUGHS NB 6. 60 6. 10 0. 00 6. 10 - SB 6. 60 6. 10 0. 00 6. 10 MINOR LEFTS - NB 7. 10 6. 60 0. 00 6. 60 SB 7. 10 6. 60 0. 00 6. 60 - IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -------_________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET 96TH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETSHELBORNE ROAD - DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . 11/24/93 ; PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING TRAFFIC AND GEOMETRICS ~~ �� CAPACITY TY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL_ MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH — MINOR ST REET ND LEFT 1 267 228 228 > 227 > C THROUGH 1 3::'5 284 > 327 294 > ter + 283 >D C RIGHT 1 790 790 > 790 > 769 > A — MINOR STREET — SD LEFT 5 275 24( > 240 > ^.35 > C THROUGH c 1 325 284 > 557 284 > 525 204 >A C RIGHT 27 72' 722 79k > 696 > A MAJOR STREET ED LEFT 156 861 B61 861 705 A NB LEFT -.., T 932 937' 932 930 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . 96TH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . SHELBORNE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 11./24/93 ; PM PEAK — OTHER INFORMATION.. . .. . EXISTING TRAFFIC AND GEOMETR I CS -~ ~~ 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* ~~ IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ____ ~~ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . 95 ~~ AREA POPULATION. . . 1000000 — NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . 96TH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETSHELBORNE ROAD — NAME OF THE ANALYST . . . . T. FORD DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) 12/01 /93 ~~ TIME PERIOD ANALYZEDAM PEAK — OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS BACKGROUND GROWTH INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _____________________________________________________________________ ~~ INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG — MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN — CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN — TRAFFIC VOLUMES ___________________________________ — EB WB NB SB ____ ____ ____ ---- LEFT 33 3 2 18 ~~ THRU 290 526 2 0 RIGHT 2 2 2 140 ~~ NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ~~ _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB _______ _______ _______ _______ — LANES 1 1 1 1 LANE USAGE LTR LTR ~~ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 N� PERCENT R101-11 RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE N� GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N = NORTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV 'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2> VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ^� MINOR RIGHTS NB 5. 90 5. 40 0. 00 5. 40 SB 5. 90 5. 40 0. 00 5. 40 MAJOR LEFTS ED 5. 20 4. 70 0. 00 4. 70 .~ WB 5. 20 4. 70 0. 00 4. 70 MINOR THROUGHS NB 6. 60 6. 10 0. 00 6. 10 ~� SB 6. 60 6. 10 0. 00 6. 10 MINOR LEFTS ~~ NB 7. 10 6. 60 0. 00 6. 60 SB 7. 10 6. 60 0. 00 6. 60 ~~ IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . 96TH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . SHELBORNE ROAD ~~ DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 12/01/93 ; AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS BACKGROUND GROWTH _ — CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 ._ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE — RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ~~ ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET — NB LEFT 2 208 161 > 161 > 159 > D THROUGH 2 308 298 > 278 298 > 271 295 >C C RIGHT 2 804 804 > 804 > 802 > A - - MINOR STREET ^ SB LEFT 21 260 249 > 249 > 229 > C THROUGH a 308 298 > 520 298 > 337 298 >B C RIGHT 162 604 604 > 604 > 442 > A ~~ MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 38 725 725 725 687 A ~~ WB LEFT 3 946 946 946 943 A — IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ — NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . 96TH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . SHELBORNE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 12/01/93 : AM PEAK — OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS BACKGROUND GROWTH ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ — ~~ -~ ~- 1985 HEM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 �.. *********** xx ******************************************************** IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ~~ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 40 — PEAK HOUR FACTOR . . . . . . . . . . . 95 AREA POPULATION 1000000 ~~ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . 96TH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET SHELBORNE ROAD — NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . T. FORD — DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . 12/01/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PM PEAK — OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS BACKGROUND GROWTH INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL .� INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG ~~ MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST — CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN ~~ TRAFFIC VOLUMES ____________________________________________________________________ ~~ ED WS NB SB ____ ____ ____ ____ LEFT 173 3 2 5 — THRU 611 481 2 0 — RIGHT 2 2 2 29 — NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ES WB NB SB — _______ LANES 1 1 1 1 — LANE USAGE LTR LTR '- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page--,T --- ---- --------------- --- - -------------- ---------- - ----------- ---- -- - PERCENT R161-IT. TURN CURB RADIUS ( ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE. FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS r, EASTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 !til NORTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N SOUTHF+OUNI7 0. 00 90 TO N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS '1. COMBINATION AND RV 'S VFH:f:CLEB MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 i 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 00 0 0 CRITICAL.. GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Tc"a&bl F: 1.0-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL_. OAP ii I N O R RIGHTS ND 5. 9u 5. 40 0. 00 5. 40 SD 5. 90 5. 40 0. 00 5. 40 MAJOR LEFTS ES 5. 20 4.. 70 0. 00 4 . 70 i WB 5. 20 4. 70 0. 00 4. 70 MINOR TI•1ROUC;HS _ NB 6. 60 6. J0 0. 00 6. 10 SB 6. 60 6. 10 0. 00 6. 10 MINOR L..EF l S NB 7. 10 6. 60 0. 00 6. 60 SD 7. 1n 6. 60 0. 00 6. 60 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE LA ST/WEST STREET. . . . . . 96TH STREET NAME OF THE NORI H/SOUTH STREET. . . . SHELBORNE ROAD DATE AND 'TIME OF l"HE ANAL_YS:Lui. . . . . 12/01/917. „ F'M PEAI:: OTHER :INFORMATION. . . . E=:X I ST I NB TRAFFIC PLUS BACKGROUND GROWTH ~ ~~ CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 _ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE — RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ~~ _______ ________ _________ ____________ ____________ --- MINOR STREET ~- NB LEFT 2 128 100 > 100 > 97 > E THROUGH 2 164 132 > 154 132 > 147 130 >D D RIGHT 2 541 541 > 541 > 539 > A — MINOR STREET ~~ SB LEFT 6 133 106 > 106 > 101 > D THROUGH 0 164 132 > 368 132 > 329 132 >B D RIGHT 34 639 639 > 639 > 605 > A — MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 200 765 765 765 565 A — WB LEFT 3 656 656 656 653 A — IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ ~~ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET 96TH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETSHELBORNE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSI9 12/01/93 ; PM PEAK — OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS BACKGROUND GROWTH ~~ ~~ ~~ — ~~ ~~ — — 1985 HEM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 — ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ~~ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 40 — PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . 1000000 ~~ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET . . . 96TH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . SHELBORNE ROAD _ NAME OF THE ANALYST . . . . . . . . . . . . T. FORD — DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) 12/01/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZEDAM PEAK ~~ OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS THE GREENS INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ~~ _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG ~~ MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST — CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN ~~ TRAFFIC VOLUMES ____ __________ ~~ ED WB NB SD ____ ____ ____ ____ LEFT 34 2 1 21 -. THRU 315 458 1 0 ~. RIGHT 1 4 1 168 _ NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB — _______ _______ _______ _______ LANES 1 1 1 1 1 11 LANE USAGE LTR LTR ADJUSTMENT FACTORS rage- 2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURD I'- AI.):[l.1'.a (4: L) ACCELE RAtT I ON LANE GRADE: AN(:31....E FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS - EASTBOUND 0. 0Q 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N - SOUTHBOUND 0.0() 90 20 N VEH:[CLE: COMPOS I T I ON "/. SU TRUCKS X COMBINATION AND RV 'S VEHICLES X MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 0 0 0 WE TIytOUND Cs t_> Cs - NORTHBOUND C) 0 0 - SOUTHBOUND C) 0 C 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DJST. FINAL (Tab 1 10- 2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CR I T I CAL GAP M:[NOR RIGH1S NB 5.90 5. 40 0. 00 L`. . 4n SD 9- 5. 400. 00 5. 40 MAJOR L..E:FTS - EL:; 5. 20 4. /0 0. 00 4. 70 i WD 5. 20 4. 70 0. 00 1 . I0 MINOR THROUGH::a _' NB 6. 60 6. 10 0. 00 6. 10 SB 6. 60 6. 10 0. 00 6. 10 - MINOR L_EF-"TS ND /. 10 6. 60 0. 00 0 6. 60 85 I. 1 0 6. 6n 0. 00 6. 60 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE FAST/WEST STREET 96TH STREET II NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETSHEL_BORNE= ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANAI.._W:IS 12/01 /9:. ; AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION- . E::X J:ST J:NS TRAFFIC PLUS THE. GREENS — ~~ CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICEPage-3 ~~ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE — RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH — _______ ________ _________ ____________ ____________ --- MINOR STREET ~~ NB LEFT 1 212 159 > 159 > 158 > D THROUGH 1 328 318 > 280 318 > 277 317 >C B~~ RIGHT 1 781 781 > 781 > 780 > A MINOR STREET — SB LEFT 24 279 269 > 269 > 245 > C THROUGH 0 329 318 > 566 318 > 347 318 >B B RIGHT 195 656 656 :::. 656 > 462 > A — MAJOR STREET ED LEFT 39 784 784 784 745 A ~~ WB LEFT 2 922 922 922 920 A — IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _________________________________ ~~ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . 96TH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . SHELBORNE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 12/01/93 ; AM PEAK — OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS THE GREENS ~~ ~~ — -~ �� ~~ _ -~ 1985 HEM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 — ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION — AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET40 — PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . 95 AREA POPULATION 1000000 ~- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET 96TH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET 9HELBORNE ROAD — NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T. FORD — DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy\ . . 12/01/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PM PEAK ~~ OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS THE GREENS INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL — INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG ~~ MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN — CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN — TRAFFIC VOLUMES — ED WB NB SD ____ ____ ____ ____ LEFT 215 2 1 6 ~~ THRU 5�5 394 1 0 ~~ RIGHT 1 15 1 33 — NUMBER _OF _LANES _AND _LANE _USAGE ______ __ _____ ___ ____ ____________________________________________ EB WB NB SB -~ _______ _______ _______ _______ LANES 1 1 1 1 — LANE USAGE LTR LTR ADJUSTMENT FACTORS - PERCENT NT !I C7I'1l TURN CURB RADIUS r.> ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT 'TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND u. 00 90 TO N F- WESTBOUND 0. 00 90 '0 N NORTHBOUND C). 00 90 SOUTHBOUND 0. 00 70 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION _ ! SU TRUCKS 7. COMBINATION / MOTORCYCLES AND RV 'S `�EHICL_L S EASTBOUND 0 WESTBOUND t-) i? 0 - NORTHBOUND i_i -- SOUTHBOUND i CRITICAL GAPS _ ___________ _____ _______ ______ __ ____ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FIN!A!_. ( 1 ,11-1,3 (-- 10"-•.') VALUE: ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL... GAP MINOR RIGHTGMB �_) -�, 5.405.40E 5. 40• 5. 70 5. 40 0. 00 5. 40 - SB MAJOR LEFTS �). U�") 4.70ED 5. 20 4,. 7C) 20 4 . 70 0.00 4. 70 MINOR THROUGi...IC 6. 10 0. 0u 6. 1i) NB 6. 60 •6. 10 0. 00 6. 10 SD 6. 60 - MINOR LEFTS NB 7. 10 6. 60 6. 60�).c)c, . c) SB 7. 10 6. 60 0. 00 . 60 60 - IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST/WEST STREET- NAMEOF THE 961..H STREET - NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETSHELBORNE ROAD r> ].�:'/C?:l/ter'". f-->r'! PEAK DATE AND TIME OF .THE ANALYSIS OTHER INFORMATION- . CXIST INS TRAFFIC PLUS THE GREENS _ . _ CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 _____________________________________________________________________ 1POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY N MOVEMENT v (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS SH _ p M SH R _______ ________ _________ ____________ ___ ________ ___ r MINOR STREET — NB LEFT 1 152 113 > 113 > 112 > D THROUGH 1 192 148 > 174 148 > 170 147 >D D RIGHT 1 597 597 > 597 > 596 > A MINOR STREET ~~ SB LEFT 7 160 123 > 123 > 116 > D THROUGH 0 194 149 > 407 149 > 362 149 >B D RIGHT 38 702 702 > 702 > 664 > A — MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 249 832 832 832 583 A ^- WB LEFT 2 718 718 718 715 A — IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ______________________ ~~ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . 96TH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . SHELBORNE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 12/01/93 ; PM PEAK — OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS THE GREENS — ~~ — | -~ ~~ ~~ ~~ �.. 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ~ ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ .. AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 40 ^^ PEAK HOUR FACTOR . . . . . 95 AREA POPULATION1000000 ~~ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET 96TH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET SHELBORNE ROAD — NAME OF THE ANALYST . T. FORD ^. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) 11/24/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . AM PEAK = OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING GEOMETRICS AND FUTURE TRAFFIC INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ~� INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG at: MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST = CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN ~- TRAFFIC VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ — EB WB NB SB ____ ____ ____ ____ LEFT 45 3 2 34 ITHRU 420 636 2 2 RIGHT 2 9 2 219 • 10 N� 4 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE _____________________________________-------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ~ _______ _______ _______ _______ ' LANES 1 1 1 1 1 0 LTR LTR LANE USAGE _ - ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 ------__________________ _______________________________________ PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURD RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE I GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS _______ ________________ EASTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N II WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N N� NORTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N r SOUTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N - VEHICLE COMPOSITION _____________________________________________________________________ r % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV 'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ___________ ____ ________ _____________ - EASTBOUND 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 ~~ NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 - CRITICAL GAPS _____________________________________________________________________ ~~ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ________ ___________ ____________ _ MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.90 5. 40 0. 00 5. 40 SB 5. 90 5. 40 0. 00 5. 40 - , MAJOR LEFTS ED 5. 20 4. 70 0.00 4. 70 wii 5. 20 5 20 4. 70 0. 00 4. 70 MINOR THROUGHS NB 6. 60 6. 10 0. 00 6. 10 - SB 6. 60 6. 10 0. 00 6. 10 MINOR LEFTS - NB 7. 10 6. 60 0. 00 6.60 | SB 7. 10 6. 60 0. 00 6. 60 - IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________ ---------------- N� NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . 96TH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . SHELBORNE ROAD 7 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 11/24/93 ; AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATIO` . . . . EXISTING GEOMETRICS AND FUTURE TRAFFIC pi � � CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 P'OTEN-- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE II RATE CAE'Al::I TY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c: -• v LOS p III SH R SH --- MINOR STREET F NB LEFT 2 120 67 > 67 > 65 > E THROUGH :Z 207 196 > 140 196 > 133 194 >D D RIGHT 2 687 667 607 > 685 > A r MINOR STREET r SB LEFT 39 172 161 > 161 > 122 > D THROUGH2 200 197 > 398 197 > 103 195 >D D RIGHT 25 522 522 > "=-)'72 > 268 > C MAJOR STREET ES LEFT 52 633 633 633 581 A r WB LEFT 3 820 820 820 817 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION — NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET 96TH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETSHELBORNE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 11/24/93 H AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING GEC)METR:ECS AND FUTURE: TRAFFIC a ki 1905 1-1CM: UNS I.(3NAL._I Z ED :I:NTERSECT I ONES Page -1 hi .#.* .h.H.fr k N 3f#••#-1FXki. *K.;c.WX.yc *. . ..4•i4• .#. •*.?f•***N••9i••)f•*•►4•**##**•i4 *• .34.**4 34•K M.K*%.* M. *0.0 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 40 '- PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREA POPULATION „ . . . „ 1000000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. , „ 96TH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET SHELBORNE ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST T. FORD ... DAT'E: OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) 11/2.4•/97 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. PM PEAF�: OTHER :INFORMATION. . . . EX7STING GEOMETR:FCS AND FUTURE TRAFFIC INTERSECTION TYPE: AND CONTROL INTERSECTION •TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL. TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ED WB ND SB LEFT ^9? _ 14 THRU 772 47 0 RIGHT 2 24 59 .,, NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ED WB ND SD LANES 1 1 1 1 r,, LANE USAGE LTR LTR _ - ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 _____ IPERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ________________ _________________ EASTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N 11 WESTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N r SOUTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N p~ VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------________________________________________________ r % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV 'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES _____________ _____________ P" EASTBOUND 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 ~~ NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 - CRITICAL GAPS - TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ________ ___________ ____________ ~~ MINOR RIGHTS NB 5. 90 5. 40 0. 00 5. 40 SB 5. 90 5. 40 0. 00 5. 40 ~~ MAJOR LEFTS ED 5. 20 4. 70 0. 00 4. 70 - WB 5. 20 4. 70 0. 00 4.70 MINOR THROUGHS NB 6. 60 6. 10 0. 00 6. 10 - SB 6. 60 6. 10 0. 00 6. 10 MINOR LEFTS - NB 7. 10 6. 60 0. 00 6. 60 SB 7. 10 6. 60 0. 00 6. 60 - IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET 96TH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETSHELBORNE ROAD ~~ DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . 11/24/93 ; PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING GEOMETRICS AND FUTURE TRAFFIC ~~ CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 ~~ ______________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL ~� FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS ~~ p M SH R SH MINOR STREET NB LEFT 2 91 49 > 49 > 47 > E THROUGH 2 111 65 > 79 65 > 72 62 >E E ~~ RIGHT 2 433 433 > 433 > 431 > A MINOR STREET ~~ SB LEFT 16 91 52 > 52 > 36 > E THROUGH 0 111 65 > 197 65 > 113 65 >D E RIGHT 68 579 579 > 579 > 510 > A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 339 686 686 686 347 B ^� WB LEFT 3 543 543 543 540 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ___________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET 96TH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETSHELBORNE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS11/24/93 ; PM PEAK ~� OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING GEOMETRICS AND FUTURE TRAFFIC _ ~~ 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********** ********************************************************** =.• IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -------------------------------__ ---- -- _____________________________ — AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR . . . . . . 95 �.. AREA POPULATION 1000000 — NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . 96TH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETINVERNESS DRIVE — NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . T. FORD DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . 11/29/93 ~~ TIME PERIOD ANALYZED . . . . . . . . . AM PEAK ~~ OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE TRAFFIC INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ~~ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION — MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN ~~ TRAFFIC VOLUMES _______________________ ~~ EB WB NB SB ____ ____ ____ ____ — LEFT 10 0 -- 28 THRU 389 645 -- 0 — RIGHT 0 16 -- 47 — NUMBER OF LANES ______________________________________.....______________________________ — EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 -- 2 ~~ ~~ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS P age- 2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURD RADIUS ( ft ) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N ~~ WESTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND �� _____ SOUTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION ~~ % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV 'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ___________ ~~ EASTBOUND 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND --- - - --- SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10- 2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ^� MINOR RIGHTS SB 5. 90 5. 40 0. 00 5. 40 ~~ MAJOR LEFTS ED 5 20 4 70 0 00 4 70 � . . . . ~� MINOR LEFTS SB 7. 10 6. 60 0. 00 6.60 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET96TH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETINVERNESS DRIVE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 11/29/93 ; AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE TRAFFIC ea _ -~ CAPACITY AND LEVEL OF-SERVICE Page-3 — _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL ~~ FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ~~ _______ ________ _________ ____________ ____________ --- MINOR STREET — SB LEFT 32 191 189 189 156 D RIGHT 54 513 513 513 459 A — MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 12 622 622 622 610 A ~~ �., IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . 96TH STREET — NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . INVERNESS DRIVE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 11/29/93 ; AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE TRAFFIC ~~ — �� — — ~~ -~ ~~ ~~ _ — 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 -~ ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ~~ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 40 — PEAK HOUR FACTOR . . . . . . 95 AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . 1000000 — NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET96TH STREET _` NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET INVERNESS DRIVE NAME OF THE ANALYSTT. FORD — DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) 11/29/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZEDPM PEAK — OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE TRAFFIC INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ~~ _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION ~~ MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST ~~ CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ~~ __________________________ EB WB NB SB ~~ ____ ____ ____ __....._ LEFT 58 0 -- 31 THRU 746 429 -- 0 — RIGHT 0 33 -- 18 ~~ NUMBER OF LANES _ EB WB NB SB _______ _______ _______ _______ LANES 1 1 -- 2 — — ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 ~~ PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N ~~ NORTHBOUND ----- --- --- - SOUTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION ~� % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV 'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES _____________ ^� EASTBOUND 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND --- --- --- 8OUTHBOUND 0 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10 -2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS SB 5. 90 5. 40 0. 00 5. 40 ~~ MAJOR LEFTS EB 5. 20 4. 70 0. 00 4. 70 ^� MINOR LEFTS SB 7. 10 6. 60 0. 00 6. 60 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ~~ _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET 96TH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETINVERNESS DRIVE ~~ DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS11/29/93 ; PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE TRAFFIC CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL ~~ FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH _______ ________ _________ ____________ ____________ --- MINOR STREET SD LEFT 36 139 132 132 96 E RIGHT 21 668 668 668 647 A MAJOR STREET ED LEFT 67 784 784 784 717 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET 96TH STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETINVERNESS DRIVE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS11/29/93 ; PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE TRAFFIC 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ~~ ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 35 ~~ PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 AREA POPULATION . 1000000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . INVERNESS DRIVE ~~ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . SHELBORNE ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . T. FORD ~~ DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy\ 11/29/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE TRAFFIC INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ~~ _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ~~ EB WB NB SB -~ ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 33 0 11 ~~ THRU -- 429 70 159 RIGHT -- 15 5 18 NUMBER OF LANES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB _______ _______ _______ _______ LANES -- 2 1 1 — ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 __________ — PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ~~ EASTBOUND ----- --- --- WESTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N ~~ NORTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV 'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ~� EASTBOUND --- --- --- WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND a 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS ______ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ___________ ____________ MINOR RIGHTS WB 5. 70 5. 20 0. 00 5. 20 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5. 10 4. 60 0. 00 4. 60 ~~ MINOR LEFTS NB 6. 80 6. 30 0. 00 6. 30 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ~~ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . INVERNESS DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . SHELBORNE ROAD ~� DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 11/29/93 ; AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE TRAFFIC CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE r --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN.-.. ACTUAL _., FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c -- v LOS p !1 SH R SH MINOR STREET WB LEFT _';8 703 699 698 659 A RIGHT 17 998 998 998 981 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 13 1000>4 10 1 000 1 000 987 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . INVERNESS DRIVE ... NAME. OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . SHELBORNE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE AN.IALYSIS.. . . . . 11/29/9 ; AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . F(JTURE TRAFFIC _ _ 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 — ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ___________________ ~~ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 35 — PEAK HOUR FACTOR . . 95 AREA POPULATION1000000 — NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREETINVERNESS DRIVE ~~ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . SHELBORNE ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYSTT. FORD — DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) 11/29/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED PM PEAK ~~ OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE TRAFFIC — INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION — MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH ~~ CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ~~ _______ ED WD NB SB 7 ____ ____ ____ ____ LEFT -- 7 0 11 THRU -- 429 205 55 iA RIGHT -- 25 47 18 NUMBER OF LANES ' I ED WB NB SB _______ _______ _______ _______ LANES -- 2 1 1 -~ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 ~~ PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURD RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS _______ __________ ________________ _________________ ~~ EASTBOUND ----- --- --- _ WESTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV 'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ___________ ~~ EASTBOUND --- --- --- WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 ~� SOUTHBOUND O 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10- 2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS NB 5. 70 5. 20 0.00 5. 20 ~~ MAJOR LEFTS SB 5. 10 4. 60 0. 00 4. 60 ~� MINOR LEFTS WB 6. 80 6. 30 0. 00 6. 30 ~� IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . INVERNESS DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . SHELBORNE ROAD ~� DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 11/29/93 ; PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE TRAFFIC �� CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 ~— ----------------------------------------------------------------- --- POTEN- ACTUAL ~� FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS ~ p M SH R SH MINOR STREET WB LEFT 8 657 652 652 644 A RIGHT 29 908 908 900 879 A ~~ MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 13 982 982 982 969 A a a IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET INVERNESS DRIVE ~� NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETSHELBORNE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 11/29/93 ; PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE TRAFFIC II II 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS I; ***************************************************************Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION __________________________ N� ------------------------------------------- �� ~~ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET35 .. PEAK HOUR FACTOR. 95 �� . . . . �� AREA POPULATION 1000000 NI NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . AUGUSTA DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET SHELBORNE ROAD ~ ` NAME OF THE ANALYST . T. FORD ~- DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . 11/29/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . , . . . . AM PEAK ~~ OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE TRAFFIC ~^ INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG NI MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN �� CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN NI TRAFFIC VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ — EB WB NB SB ____ ____ ____ ____ w- LEFT 18 33 8 11 THRU 0 1 70 159 II RIGHT 29 14 5 8 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE N� ------------------------�-------------------------------------------- �� EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- n� LANES 2 2 1 1 II LANE USAGE L + R L + TR � �� - ^~ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS N� Page-2 m1 -- ---------------------- --- ------ ---- ---- -____________________ ___ __ __ PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE N� GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS _______ __________ ________________ _________________ EASTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N II WESTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N M.4 VEHICLE COMPOSITION _____________________________________________________________________ - % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV 'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES _____________ /I EASTBOUND 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 =� , NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 ~~ CRITICAL GAPS _______________________________________________ I TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP __ ____ ~� ________ / MINOR RIGHTS EB 5. 70 5. 20 0. 00 5. 20 WB 5. 70 5. 20 0. 00 5. 20 04 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5. 10 4. 60 0. 00 4. 60 - NB 5. 10 4. 60 0. 00 4. 60 MINOR THROUGHS °= EB 6. 30 5. 80 0. 00 5. 80 NB 6. 30 5. 80 0. 00 5. 80 MINOR LEFTS EB 6. 80 6. 30 0. 00 6. 30 I WB 6. 80 6. 30 0. 00 6. 30 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION 7 ------- __________________________________________________....... ________ _ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREETAUGUSTA DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETSHELBORNE ROAD N� DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 11/29/93 ; AM PEAK � OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE TRAFFIC _ ~ - CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE — _______________________________________________________________Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL ~~ FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS ~~ p M SH R SH _______ ________ _________ ____________ ____________ --- MINOR STREET — ES LEFT 21 677 661 661 640 A THROUGH 0 769 759 > 759 > 759 > A ~~ RIGHT 34 961 961 > 961 961 > 928 928 >A A MINOR STREET — WB LEFT 38 663 640 640 602 A THROUGH 1 767 757 > 757 > 756 > A RIGHT 16 998 998 > 978 998 > 960 982 >A A — MAJOR STREET ~~ SB LEFT 13 1000 1000 1000 987 A NB LEFT 9 998 998 998 988 A ~~ IDENTIFYING INFORMATION — _______________ _______________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREETAUGUSTA DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETSHELBORNE ROAD ~~ DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 11/29/93 ; AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE TRAFFIC — = — — ~~ — 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 11 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET35 -~ PEAK HOUR FACTOR ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ . 95 AREA POPULATION 1000000 N� NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREETAUGUSTA DRIVE ~� NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. SHELBORNE ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYSTT. FORD ~ DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) 11/29/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE TRAFFIC = INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL N� --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG N/ MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ED WB NB SB LEFT 2 6 48 11 w� THRU 0 1 205 55 RIGHT 27 25 47 6 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- ED WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 2 2 1 1 LANE USAGE L + R L + TR /I . ADJUSTMENT FACTORS N� - --- -__________________________________________- --- ____________Page2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURD RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE I GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS _______ __________ ________________ _____ ___ EASTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N Ni NORTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N �� N� VEHICLE COMPOSITION I % SU TRUCKS Y. COMBINATION AND RV 'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES _____________ IEASTBOUND 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 14 NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 - | ` CRITICAL GAPS NI TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP -------------- -------- ----------- N� ------------ N� MINOR RIGHTS �� EB 5. 70 5. 20 0. 00 5. 20 WB 5. 70 5. 20 0. 00 5. 20 0I MAJOR LEFTS SB 5. 10 4. 60 0. 00 4. 60 IND 5. 10 4. 60 0. 00 4. 60 MINOR THROUGHS ED 6. 30 5. 80 0. 00 5. 80 WB 6. 30 5. 80 . 0. 00 5 80 �� MINOR LEFTS - ED 6. 80 6. 30 0. 00 6. 30 WB 6. 80 6. 30 0. 00 6. 30 - IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET AU8USTA DRIVE - NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETSHELBORNE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 11/29/93 ; PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE TRAFFIC /I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE/I __________________ __-----------------------------____________Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL v.+ FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH I ------- -------- --------- ------------ -----------_ ___ MINOR STREET I ED LEFT 2 573 539 539 536 A THROUGH 0 662 635 > 635 > 635 > A RIGHT 31 999 999 > 999 999 > 968 968 >A A "" MINOR STREET ~~ WB LEFT 7 588 553 553 546 A Ndi THROUGH 1 682 654 > 654 > 653 > A RIGHT 29 908 908 > 894 908 > 864 879 >A A �� MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 13 982 982 982 969 A iimB LEpT 56 1000 1000 1000 944 A — IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ______________________________________ _ ~~ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . AUGUSTA DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . SHELBORNE ROAD — DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS- -. . . 11/29/93 ; PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE TRAFFIC ~- ~- - — —