HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication for Automatic Traffic Control Signal E116th and AAA Way APPLICATION
FOR
AUTOMATIC TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL
(EAST 116TH STREET AND AAA WAY)
Prepared by: Prepared for:
The Linder Company
8555 North River Road Carmel City Council
Suite 375 Carmel Board of Public Works and Safety
Indianapolis, Indiana 46240
f ;ontent
Letter of Introduction
and
Proposed Ordinance
2 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
3 Photograph
4 Current Site Plan
5 Proposed Site Plan
AVERY READY INDEX,,,, INDEXING SYSTEM
NELSON
FRANKENBERGER
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW
JAMES J. NELSON 3021 EAST 98th STREET
CHARLES D. FRANKENBERGER SurrE 220
JAMES E. SHINAVER INDIANAPOLIS,INDIANA 46280
LAWRENCE J. KEMPER 317-844-0106
of counsel FAX: 317-846-8782
JANE B. MERRILL
August 13, 1996
Dick Hill
Office of the City Engineer
One Civic Square
Carmel, Indiana 460323
Re: Automatic Traffic Control Signal -
Intersection of East 116th Street and AAA Way
Dear Dick:
In connection with the acquisition and redevelopment of Merchants Square (formerly
Keystone Square) by The Linder Company, it is desirous of installing, at its cost and expense,
an automatic traffic control signal at the intersection of East 116th Street and AAA Way. Please
find enclosed an informational booklet describing this proposal ("Booklet").
Under Tab 2 of the Booklet, please find a Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis ("Analysis)
prepared by A & F Engineering Company, Inc. (January, 1995) establishing that a traffic control
signal is warranted at the intersection of East 116th Street and the easternmost driveway now
providing access to Merchants Square from East 116th Street (see page 13 of Analysis) ("Current
Driveway").
As part of the redevelopment plan ("Plan"), direct access to the shopping area from East
116th Street via the Current Driveway will be restricted, and the Current Driveway downgraded
from a primary to a secondary means of ingress and egress. The Plan also provides for AAA
Way to become the primary entrance to Merchants Square from East 116th Street ("New
Entrance"). This change will transfer from the Current Driveway to the New Entrance the exiting
volumes of traffic sufficient to warrant a traffic signal at this intersection, as confirmed by A &
F Engineering (refer to Tab 2 - Correspondence dated July 9, 1996 from A & F Engineering to
Terry Jones).
I am requesting your assistance in placing this proposal on the agenda of the August 21,
1996 meeting of the Board of Public Works and Safety for its review and consideration.
Following the Board of Public Works and Safety meeting, we intend to present the proposed
ordinance to the City Council for its review and consideration on Tuesday, September 24, 1996.
Dick Hill
August 13, 1996
Page 2
Thank you for your assistance, and
With kindest regards,
NELSON & FRANKENBERGER
Nelson
JJN.lh
CC: Hon. James C. Brainard
M. Kate Boyle
Terry Jones
Mark T. Monroe
Ernie Reno
Craig Hessee
ORDINANCE NO. D-
.-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE OF
CARMEL, INDIANA, CHAPTER 89, SECTION 8-121(8)
ESTABLISHING AN AUTOMATIC TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL
AT EAST 116TH STREET AND AAA WAY
WHEREAS, the City of Cannel has adopted a Code of Ordinances which constitute the
City Code of Cannel, Indiana; and
WHEREAS, the Code of Ordinances provides for traffic control and the establishment
of stop intersections at Chapter 8; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the citizens of the City of Cannel, Indiana, that
City Ordinance Section 8 establish an automatic traffic control signal at the intersection of East
116th Street and AAA Way, Cannel, Indiana.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CARMEL, INDIANA, THAT Cannel City Ordinance, as amended, Chapter 8,
Section 8-121(8) is hereby amended to establish an automatic traffic control signal at the
intersection of East 116th Street and AAA Way in Cannel, Indiana.
IT IS FURTHER ORDAINED that the Cannel Street Department shall post all
necessary signage as required by this Ordinance, forthwith.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. Passed by the
Common Council of the City of Cannel, Indiana, this day of , 1996.
COMMON COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CARMEL, INDIANA
By:
James C. Brainard
Presiding Officer
ATTEST:
Diana L. Cordray,
Clerk-Treasurer
4
��� ..,....
��o�u�30o?��, A & F ENGINEERING CO. INC. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING STUDIES•TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSES
STREET 6 HIGHWAY DESIGN • TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN
nl n i C O N S U LT I N G ENGINEERS STREET A HIGHWAY LIGHTING DESIGN • PARKING LOT DESIGN
•
,'4 WILLIAM J. FEHRIBACH, P.E. CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING
41, Of" PRESIDENT
In 1' . '4/
July 9, 1996
Mr. Terry Jones
Department of Community Development
City of Carmel
1 Civic Square
Carmel, IN 46032
Re: Proposed Traffic Signal
116th Street & Keystone Square Shopping Center
Dear Mr. Jones:
Enclosed please find the Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis for the above mentioned intersection
which was prepared at the request of the City of Carmel. The results of the analysis show a
traffic signal is warranted. Therefore, the City of Carmel could authorize the installation of a
traffic signal.
The Linder Company now proposes major changes to the Shopping Center which will include
making the western most driveway the primary driveway off of 116th Street.
Based on a review of the data in the analysis, it is my opinion with the proposed adjustments
to the existing access points, the traffic will shift to the western driveway where a traffic signal
will now be warranted. This will be a much more desirable location since the driveway is
further from Keystone Avenue. Further, there will be little or no chance for traffic to backup
to Keystone Avenue.
Please review the data. If you agree, request the City Council to authorize the installation of
the traffic signal. We will be happy to meet with you to further discus this request at your
earliest convenience.
In view of the tight schedule for this project, we would appreciate a response by Wednesday,
July 17, 1996. Thank you for your prompt consideration.
Sincerely,
A&F Engineering Co., Inc.
_ Y I 'Z"‘_
William J. ehribach, P.E.
President
II
. 5172 EAST 65TH STREET - INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46220 - TELEPHONE (317)842-0864
FACSIMILE (317)849-6816
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
WARRANT ANALYSIS
116TH STREET AND KEYSTONE SQUARE
SHOPPING CENTER DRIVEWAY
CARMEL, INDIANA
PREPARED FOR
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
JANUARY 1995
PREPARED BY:
A & F ENGINEERING CO., INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
5172 EAST 65TH STREET
INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46220
(317) 842-0864
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Certification
Introduction 1
Purpose 1
Scope Of Work 1
Traffic Data 1
Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis 2
Results of Traffic Signal Warrant Analyses 13
Summary 13
Appendix A 14
LIST OF TABLES
Page
1. Traffic Volume Data for Warrant Analysis 2
CERTIFICATION
I certify that this Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis has been
prepared by me and under my immediate supervision and that I have
experience and training in the field of traffic and transportation
engineering.
A & F ENGINEERING CO. INC. '''►V
•.•'G\STfR• �fr'
4 ' jehribach, Na 128551
STATE OF S Ct
iiam P.E.
President �,�,, • G�
e°e•ei'/ON A�E
Indiana Registration 12855 ►,,,,,,,,,,,
i
INTRODUCTION
This Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis has been prepared at the
request of the Department of Community Development, City of Carmel.
The traffic signal warrant analysis is for the intersection of
116th Street and the Keystone Square Shopping Center Driveway in
Carmel, Indiana.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this analysis is to determine if the existing
traffic volumes will be sufficient to warrant the installation of
a traffic signal at the intersection of 116th Street and Keystone
Square Shopping Center Driveway.
SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of work for this analysis is to first determine the
existing traffic volumes at the intersection of 116th Street and
Keystone Square Shopping Center Driveway.
Based on the data that has been developed, prepare a traffic signal
warrant analysis for the intersection of 116th Street and Keystone
Square Shopping Center Driveway.
TRAFFIC DATA
A & F Engineering Co. , Inc has made a 12-hour manual traffic
volume count at the intersection. This traffic volume count
includes a hourly total of all traffic as it approaches the
1
intersection. This traffic volume count was made on December 7,
1994 . A summary of the hour by hour traffic volumes between the
hours of 8 : 00 AM to 8:00 PM is shown in Table 1. A copy of the
total traffic volume count is included in Appendix A.
TABLE 1
TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA FOR WARRANT ANALYSIS
Hour SB EB WB EB+WB
8- 9A 104 413 815 1228
9-10A 138 479 602 1081
10-11A 149 500 569 1069
11-12N 208 647 701 1348
12- 1P 321 759 730 1489
1- 2P 290 558 743 1301
2- 3P 205 596 714 1310
3- 4P 148 631 631 1262
4- 5P 175 717 680 1397
5- 6P 158 741 663 1404
6- 7P 198 599 627 1226
7- 8P 148 453 441 894
Totals 2242 7093 7916 15009
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS
To qualify for the installation of a traffic signal, one or more of
the Primary Traffic Signal Warrants from the "Indiana Manual on
Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways" must be
met. These warrants are:
Warrant 1 - Minimum Vehicular Volume
Warrant 2 - Interruption of Continuous Traffic
Warrant 3 - Minimum Pedestrian Volume
The following Supplemental Warrants indicate an advisory condition,
but do not require the installation of a traffic signal:
2
Warrant 4 - School Crossing
Warrant 5 - Progressive Movement
Warrant 6 - Accident Experience
Warrant 7 - System Warrant
Warrant 8 - Combination of Warrants
Warrant 9 - New Facilities
Warrant 10 - Special Access
Warrant 11 - Four Hour Volume
The following Supplemental Guidelines are only considerations and
are not sufficient cause to install a traffic signal:
Guideline 12 - Peak Hour Delay
Guideline 13 - Peak Hour Volume
3
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS
116TH STREET AND KEYSTONE SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER DRIVEWAY
CARMEL, INDIANA
Location: 116th Street and Keystone Square Shopping Center
Date: January 25, 1995
Qualifiers:
School Crossing No
Existing Signal No
Isolated Community under 10,000 No
Rural Warrant Applicable No
Speed on Major Street 30
40 MPH Speed Warrant Applicable No
116th Street : Major Street 2 Lane Approach
Driveway : Minor Street 2 Lane Approach
WARRANT 1 - MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME
Required Volume Hours Met
116th Street 600 12
Driveway 200 5
Hours in Common 5
Requirement: Eight (8) hours in common.
Warrant 1 is not met.
WARRANT 2 - INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC
Required Volume Hours Met
116th Street 900 11
Driveway 100 12
Hours in Common 11
Requirement: Eight (8) hours in Common.
Warrant 2 is met.
4
WARRANT 3 - MINIMUM PEDESTRIAN VOLUME
Pedestrians are not a factor at this intersection.
Required Volume Hours Met
600
Pedestrians 150 0
Hours in Common 0
Requirement: Eight (8) hours in common.
Warrant 3 is not met.
WARRANT 4 - SCHOOL CROSSING
This is not a school crossing.
Average Number of persons per minute:
Width of street:
Required vehicular volume: V.P.H.
Actual vehicular volumes: Period 1:
Period 2:
Period 3 :
Minimum number persons crossing:
Requirements: 1. Two periods of demand for each school day.
2 . More than 50 persons per hour crossing
Warrant 4 is not met.
WARRANT 5 - PROGRESSIVE "MOVEMENT
Distance to adjacent signals:
N: S: 900 E: 2800 W:
Requirements: 1. Adjacent signals do not provide the necessary
degree of vehicle platooning and/or speed
grouping.
2. Adjacent signals at least 1000 ft apart.
Warrant 5 is not met.
5
NABRANT 6 - ACCIDENT EXPERIENCE
C" : Accidents were not reviewed.
Requirement: Five or more reported accidents of types
susceptible to correction by traffic signal
control, have occurred within a 12 month period
with personal injury or major property damage.
Experience: Correctable Accidents in
Correctable Accidents in
Correctable Accidents in
Adjusted volumes = 80% of Warrants 1, 2, and 3.
Adjusted Volumes (80%) Compliance
Major St. Minor St. Hour
Warrant 1 480 160
Warrant 2 720 80
Warrant 3 Not Applicable
Requirement: One of the adjusted Warrants 1, 2, or 3 must have
eight (8) hours of compliance.
Warrant 6 is not met.
WARRANT 7 - SYSTEMS WARRANT
116th Street is a major route.
Driveway is not a major route.
Justification for classification as a major route.
Number of hours where - sum of all approaches is 800 or more
vehicles:
Requirements: 1. Both street must be major routes.
2 . At least one hour of volume requirement must be
met.
Warrant 7 is not met.
6
WARRANT 8 - COMBINATION OF WARRANTS
Adjusted volumes = 80% of Warrants 1, 2, and 3.
Adjusted Volumes (80%) Compliance
4ajor St. Minor St. Hour
Warrant 1 480 160 7
Warrant 2 720 80 12
Warrant 3 Not Applicable
Requirement: At least two of Warrants 1, 2, or 3 must each have
eight (8) hours of compliance.
Warrant 8 is not met.
WARRANT 9- - TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT NEW FACILITIES
This warrant does not apply.
A. Minimum Vehicle Volume Warrant #1
required Volume Actual Volume
10,000
6,000
Warrant 9A is not met.
B. Interruption of Continuous Flow Warrant #2
Required Volume Actual Volume
15,000
3,100
Warrant 9B is not met.
WARRANT 10 - SPECIAL ACCESS SIGNALIZATION
This warrant does not apply.
required Volume Hours Met
800
300
Hours in Common 0
Requirement: Two (2) hours in common.
Warrant 10 is not met.
7
WARRANT 11 - FOUR HOUR VOLUMES
Four highest volumes - Major Route
Plotted Major Minor
Point dour Street Street
1. 12-1P 1489 321
2. 5-6P 1404 158
3. 4-5P 1397 175
4. 2-3P 1310 205
Use Figure: 4-3
Use Curve: C
Note: All points fall above Curve C.
Requirement: Four hours of an average day the plotted points
representing the vehicles per hour on the major
street (total both approaches) and the
corresponding vehicles per hour on the higher
volume minor street approach (one direction only)
all fall above the curve in Figure 4-3 for the
existing combination of approach lanes.
or
When the 85th percentile speed of the major street
traffic exceeds 40 miles per hour or when the
intersection lies within a built-up area of an
isolated community having a population less than
10,000 the four hour volume requirement is
satisfied when the plotted points referred to fall
above the curve in Figure 4-4 for the existing
combination of approach lanes.
Warrant 11 is met.
8
GUIDELINE 12 - PEAK HOUR DELAY
Delays were not measured.
Stop Delay: Vehicles-Hours
Required Delay: One Lane Approach: 4.0 Vehicle-Hours Delay*
Two Lane Approach: 5.0 Vehicle-Hours Delay
Traffic Volume Side Street:
Total Entering (All Approaches)
Required Volume: Side Street: One Lane = 100 VPH*
Two Lane = 150 VPH
Total Entering: Four Approaches = 800 VPH
Three Approaches = 650 VPH*
Note: Asterisk (*) indicates condition used in this analysis.
Guideline 12 is not net.
9
GUIDELINE 23 - PEAR HOUR VOLUME
Highest Volume - Major Route
Plotted Major Minor
point Hour Street Street
1. 12-1P 1489 321
Use Figure: 4-5
Use Curve: C
Note: The point falls above line C.
Requirements: The peak hour volume warrant is satisfied when the
plotted point representing the vehicle per hour on
the major street (total of both approaches) and the
corresponding vehicle per hour of the higher volume
minor street approach (one direction only) for 1
hour (any four consecutive 15-minute periods) of an
average day falls above the curve in Figure 4-5 for
the existing combination of approach lanes.
or
When the 85th percentile speed of the major street
traffic exceeds 40 miles per hour or when the
intersection lies within a built-up area of an
isolated community having a population less than
10,000, the peak hour volume requirement is
satisfied when the plotted point referred to above
falls above the curve in Figure 4-6 for the
existing combination of approach lanes.
Guideline 13 is met.
10
FIGURE 4-3
•
,l• * * o0
- • .t
ml
o
00
e
0
0
r
r- 0
z
CC < re
o
o a o
WW
• > Wzw
E— I < I
z I DJD
J
Q W N 0Ce
O Z
Z W O I O 2 O J
r- a w -J 0 20 = z
r" 5 � 0v, 0
w
W X °a •a oo a = = t-
1— x vt w - o, < 1- 2 - 3
Z cc
o Z z = � �_ � °
Q -.JN < J 0 33wZ
a J 0 CD 02001
X > e
J 0 J
Q .rW < W O
LL w O • O 2 � 2Cr
Z J a F- [L
< ce4/i < to CL to CL
O O O < < < <
N
1---
CC
O 1. I W W w_ `Cu'
D X I n Cr J• cr
O Ce ~ CL V)
LL 0 o w < � < �
O w 2 0 2• 0
cv o I-
azaz
N > i > i
0
cr 7. < m <
O 0
, o -, w
to < ►-
0
U z
O
iO
• 'a < ,
0
0
C-,
0 0 0 0 0
0 O 0 0 0 0 •
111 -, el N ir-
HdA — H3YO Iddr 314f110A HOIH
133815 80NIW
FIGURE 4-5
* * 0
_ a
a
a
0
/ a
to
0
z
0 2 CC 0 <
•
0- w 1 o
w w
• w z
O J i
(r- - W - w o CC o
•
Z Z I > o > Lu
Z
Q Q0 o o X o Q
N - - 10 'CC
0 Cr J J
CC W w r- CC = O = w
Cr) Q O Q CC Z
'0 d CC 3 W 0
N Q S I-- _
''f _ _
• ■ . . W 0 z CC F- ~ 3
Z I as Q io •
0 w3wL
N _
—1 06 W - I.- m O = o _Z
' Z 1 L- J (> J =
06 < U
Q o 0 w
0 > W J hi i O J = Cr 2 0
d Z
L W Q 'O EQ- N - t-- a
cc
D Q J ! u,
U O= oT io ° a < < a
o 0 ►-
_ ' a, I `� w LAJ 1•11 I-
ww
0 -
f O aCCJw
Y c4 • 1 o w a s
0ao W < <n
N � Z a z
0
Q- I 0 N ; - > _z
' O o o iE
O ,n < o Q
U
I O Q
LU
o X 0-
0
1 z
I m ;0
' 0
.1.0
4 � 0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 si
0 0 0 0 0 0
4.0 ►n v en N �--
HdA — HOb02lddY 3Hf110A HOIH
133d1S 2IONIH
RESULTS OF THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS
The following are the results of this traffic signal warrant
analysis based on the exiting traffic volumes:
Warrants 2 and 11 and Guideline 13 have been met.
SUMMARY
Based on the fact that Warrant 2 (Interruption of Continuous Flow)
has been met, a traffic signal is warranted at the intersection of
116th Street and Keystone Square Shopping Center Driveway.
13
Appendix A
Traffic Volume Count - 116th Street & Keystone Square Shopping
Center Driveway
14
A & F ENGINEERING CO. , INC.
TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY
CLIENT : CITY OF CARMEL
LOCATION : 116TH STREET & KEYSTONE SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER (2)
DATE : DECEMBER 7, 1994
PEAK HOUR DATA
t 1 1 t
AM PEAK OFF PEAK PM PEAK
HR BEGIN 8:00 AM HR BEGIN 12:00 AM HR BEGIN 4:45 PM
L T R TOT L T R TOT L T R TOT
EASTBOUND 46 367 413 145 614 759 74 687 761
SOUTHBOUND 50 54 104 122 199 321 58 87 145
WESTBOUND 697 118 815 512 218 730 499 196 695
HOUR SUMMARY
HOUR SB EB WB EB+WB TOTAL
- AM -
8- 9 104 413 815 1228 1332
9-10 138 479 602 1081 1219
10-11 149 500 569 1069 1218
11-12 208 647 701 1348 1556
- PM -
12- 1 321 759 730 1489 1810
1- 2 290 558 743 1301 1591
2- 3 205 596 714 1310 1515
3- 4 148 631 631 1262 1410
4- 5 175 717 680 1397 1572
5- 6 158 741 663 1404 1562
6- 7 198 599 627 1226 1424
7- 8 148 453 441 894 1042
TOTAL 2242 7093 7916 15009 17251
13.0% 41.1% 45.9% 87.0% 100. 0%
- AM PEAK VOLUMES -
15-MIN 29 116 232
HOUR 104 413 815
PHF 0.90 0.89 0.88
- OFF PEAK VOLUMES -
15-MIN 101 223 191
HOUR 321 784 738
PHF 0.79 0.88 0.97 '
- PM PEAK VOLUMES -
15-MIN 55 199 184
HOUR 176 761 695
PHF 0.80 0.96 0.94
A & F ENGINEERING CO. , INC.
TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY
CLIENT : CITY OF CARMEL
LOCATION : 116TH STREET & KEYSTONE SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER (2)
DATE : DECEMBER 7, 1994
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL : SOUTHBOUND
HOUR LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL
PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH
AM
8- 9 50 0 50 52 2 54 102 2 104
9-10 78 2 80 50 8 58 128 10 138
10-11 83 2 85 61 3 64 144 5 149
11-12 97 1 98 110 0 110 207 1 208
PM
12- 1 122 0 122 196 3 199 318 3 321
1- 2 132 2 134 153 3 156 285 5 290
2- 3 103 1 104 98 3 101 201 4 205
3- 4 82 1 83 64 1 65 146 2 148
4- 5 90 2 92 81 2 83 171 4 175
5- 6 70 2 72 86 0 86 156 2 158
6- 7 124 1 125 73 0 73 197 1 198
7- 8 96 0 96 52 0 52 148 0 148
PASSENGER 1127 1076 2203
98.8% 97.7% 98. 3%
TRUCK 14 25 39
1.2% 2 . 3% 1.7%
BOTH 1141 1101 2242
50.9% 49. 1% 100. 0%
A & F ENGINEERING CO. , INC.
TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY
CLIENT : CITY OF CARMEL
LOCATION : 116TH STREET & KEYSTONE SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER (2)
DATE : DECEMBER 7, 1994
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL : EASTBOUND
HOUR LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL
PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH
AM
8- 9 44 2 46 347 20 367 391 22 413
9-10 66 7 73 380 26 406 446 33 479
10-11 66 0 66 421 13 434 487 13 500
11-12 144 2 146 486 15 501 630 17 647
PM
12- 1 140 5 145 588 26 614 728 31 759
1- 2 96 2 98 443 17 460 539 19 558
2- 3 63 0 63 511 22 533 574 22 596
3- 4 68 2 70 526 35 561 594 37 631
4- 5 73 0 73 634 10 644 707 10 717
5- 6 79 0 79 655 7 662 734 7 741
6- 7 76 1 77 519 3 522 595 4 599
7- 8 51 1 52 401 0 401 452 1 453
PASSENGER 966 5911 6877
97.8% 96.8% 97. 0%
TRUCK 22 194 216
2 . 2% 3.2% 3.0%
BOTH 988 6105 7093
13 .9% 86.1% 100.0%
A & F ENGINEERING CO. , INC.
TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY
CLIENT : CITY OF CARMEL
LOCATION : 116TH STREET & KEYSTONE SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER (2)
DATE : DECEMBER 7, 1994
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL : WESTBOUND
HOUR LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL
PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH
AM
8- 9 676 21 697 112 6 118 788 27 815
9-10 460 18 478 119 5 124 579 23 602
10-11 437 13 450 117 2 119 554 15 569
11-12 514 19 533 162 6 168 676 25 701
PM
12- 1 492 20 512 216 2 218 708 22 730
1- 2 534 17 551 189 3 192 723 20 743
2- 3 526 22 548 164 2 166 690 24 714
3- 4 460 18 478 149 4 153 609 22 631
4- 5 479 15 494 186 0 186 665 15 680
5- 6 470 8 478 184 1 185 654 9 663
6- 7 442 13 455 172 0 172 614 13 627
7- 8 327 3 330 111 0 111 438 3 441
PASSENGER 5817 1881 7698
96.9% 98.4% 97.2%
TRUCK 187 31 218
3. 1% 1. 6% 2.8%
BOTH 6004 1912 7916
75.8% 24 .2% 100.0%
,} i 1 •- f E yy
•
orIT idi 1 iiil, • _.. _ ,,.:1, '''
sem"`.: at ..
ri.
:.
,.
y 7i! _' i H • r PJNF _ _�
rti.
oN, rt
•
.11
- '- j ,4.111 ti ,r ..•9
A.
fir! t. r 1 I
T 4
V ' Ito ' ir 4 S .4- 4. - -it
41 - A; . i
tib
s.
}}
• $ 'ft 1 , 'i�Ii✓ T r l
SA
+
:,.., . _ ,. E___
t
a
4
r
l
= "ti $ .," , rI/ pr {' i;
K.
•
�, P Ni O ; Npti 5 r ii4 J , + y. r
. -
4.
lir1 • =7.fi r - i4
•
i }
: t
A
�q),
i{ % rr O4 tip 4i�.
T
f1 ,�yg
•� �k
H ..6 - N. _
• I Ia
',krh ,
a tt
! i ' } +i4 k.*4 , h " i t1t ** '. ,i1'...fi
, 401/4.4 , ., :1:111. , , l ,R•\ '-,, ...,:;,,, ,i,__11=_ _. , `",
S1t y �� �' i 1
ii• . . rl. •,": ''-', 4_, low ,,, .„Itil 11 ,XI _P v
IN
112
7.1:
'1'14.':
t:i
'' -'. ''llitt-7- ' '
kalte, 104141iti'',. ii, ,.. . 2
•
.r . ,
s r ;
.—.# -41" . 4:-:
' ` 1, . i i`„r, �, ` 2
"EXH1B1T A"
MALL & SHOPPING CENTER LEGEND
SPACE ( A ,APPROXIMATE TENANT
DIYEasaws
A la 700 ' 30x24 D.C. Tux
A-1 131 92 40x97 Bureau of Motor Vehicles
A-2 4000 41 x97 I Adanson Karate of Corner
A-3 2328 24 x97 I Wooden Key•Hallmark
A•4 3224 38 x 97 i
,
A-5 558 18x31 Target Snack Bar
A•6 6501 25x26
A•7 I I 1 88 27x 44 Hermans trine I e
A-8 I 191 41 33x 66 1 Radio Shack
I Iillill
2•ia ( 660 24x27
--Io 1188 ' x - - ameron's TCB'
B-2 663 1 17x 39 1 The Dr."- 5 ••
•3 936 4x 39 I 1 e •ocorner
8.4 4 8 01 20x 2 4 1 Ariene's Corner Sweet Sh000e MALL
2.6 3 13 4 53x 73 Johnny's Sports Nostalgia SPACE GLA
2-7 770 15x 51 Glass Shoe - Target 92, 1 64
B-8 1 4025 41 x 97 Glass Sh000e Unit A Shops I7,754
B•9 3249 33x 97 Indiana Lieut- tEa tenter Unit B Shops —L5,105
1 I Unit C Shops 1,7 1 0
C• I 1 1 7 1 0 i 30x a 1 Jazz It Up, .nc. Unit D Shops 13,017
1 - Unit E Shops 13,545
Q I 23 1 S ; 41x 56 I Furniture Den, Inc- _ Total 153,295
D-2 25501 7x 6$ r�
D-4 5 1871 77x 65+{nOutlet
D•5 1• 1435j2! x68 � DesignerQa-
I
D 6 1 5 791 23x 6d i _ SHOPPING CENTER
E•la J 700 2.9 x 24 1 Travel Agentx International w SPACE GLA
- E f b _ 29x 44 Indiana Linhtinq_(Storage) p
c- 14- 34:x 68 Bridais and Fashions �� • Unit K Shops
E •3 1 3 701 20 x 6 8 I Unit KA: Workout Centre 10,800
E 4 11'701 20 z 68 1 -Unit K-B:Party Tree 11,490
E•5 l 713 25 x I W "Unit K-C=Party Tree 2,500
1 3 70 •x - = Suzie"s Silk Garden ¢ Unit L•11 10,200
E •7 f 36 1 21 55x 65 I _ Unit F Shops 15,925
rW W CC it G Shops 10,529
F-is 8 531 31 x 27 I Sound Productions z Theater 9,1 3 0
F• I 14000 • x100 Sound Productions 13 �o Restaurant 8,00 0
F•2 135001 352100! Play M � Sports } Unit H Shops 6,409
F-3 2500 25 i100 w Unit I Shops 10,740
F•4 i 2790 30x93 Acsilltws Care = Deli Y Outer B1dgs.(1-5) 21,968
F-5 12-00 20x 60 I Baskin- Robbins Total I L7,69 I
II1 0$0 18x 60 McJant Inc Camera
2400 30x 80 Plotner's GRAND TOTAL 270,986
iiii ••.
I VS x : • :asket ase.
1440 18x 80 The Hair Studio •
IINCllf[ I 4armei •• mit tudio /
�� _= T• 2 K :arber Sho• 1 =
G•6 15 361 28x55 : . • _ PARKING RATIO - 5.5 CAR
�! i�� •• •r is�iiE.• -. . /IOOOs.f.
H• 1 I894( :$ s.: ..
H-2 I L1 3: 1 x 6
H•3 I I 1 a2 1-7x 65
H•4 227 35x 65 Frames S Things
I • I 1057 22x 47 [k. Lomat Optometrist
i '2 $00 17x 47L SCALE IN rte,-- E 3L
MMII
•3 1 1 3 6Y 2.9x 47 TrBox Box Carnoany ac so
I -4 940 20x 47 Qne of a Kind -
I -5 1 . munners For m
inw,enplar.
riii :. 4 C •'• I Hill leaners
a i ar o. M (\ /---------
1 4 10
-----
1410 30x4 1 - - , •I ... • .
♦ , • i U
^ 2
' \ 2
S
■i.
.. G• ,y y 6 Gr s rn
,s, CqV E ••
•e Rr
�• e,
`i' f? r ..4, W
-'
- ---... db--.. EL---1_,—, -
8 - � _1 � oc/D �
r- E®
sal .4
it
wry Cy(.j ---r-i ..... .._I 77��,, 4a- 1
la �-
= * kL
/.... � +.. •
F3 amro.a q 7lj l
.. ......: c.-. ---4
,,-,, .„...._ />, , .
. ...., ..". , E—i
_ it
m/.. _ a
' Z
♦. ,;; �E 1
.(j