Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLetter to City Council from Judy Hagan, 6/28/91 June 28 , 1991 De.a.r City Coun i i , At the July I !iiee t i iiS_j t- e Carmel City _oiin=_ i f tr e Comprehensive Plan I Ipd .te will be be+ore you for approval , amendment or rejection . H very, important decision awaits you . In the end , atter all the public hearinos and discussion , it comes down to _ _t3.i='l i h I nc pubi i _ pol i _ -For our community . The public poi i i_; you set will du i de the development • .nd orowthl o+ 'i.r!r` entire township . e i Jer; t•_ o+, ia'•. I4e t he.ve pree..ented our concerns m1n;. + times _;:!};,r. the last -F P!;;! years . W E' hope that r iL i o•_.r= concerns are addressed .as you make th i = important publ i c policy decision . I have enclosed two resolutions -. or .y.ri`erid i riy the Update which I hope you wl i support . Sincerely , Judy H dan I i_ t 4,_ Sprind Mill Lane N-i. 848-4752 cc : City Attorney 6/28/91 RESOLUTION REGARDING U.S. 31 FREEWAY STATUS ON UPDATE THOROUGHFARE MAP Since "Based on the conceptual Sketch Plan review, the U. S. 31 freeway alternative forms the basis of the updated thoroughfare plan" (pg. 124) ; and Since " Failure to accomodate excess demand on U.S. 31 will most surely result in traffic diversion to Spring Mill Road and College Avenue , where congestion and impacts from high traffic volumes are more disruptive" (pg. 124) ; and Since the Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee recognized " the potential magnitude of future needs and probable extended timeframe for implementation" and " that nothing should be done prior to the next major plan update (5 years) to jeopardize implementation of major sketch plan components" (pg. 123-124) ; and Since "This planning process has verified the need for a freeway facility (pg. 135) ; and Since "The combination of the U.S. 31 freeway , parallel collector roadways, and interchange connectors will operate as a system, supporting the need for a high degree of cooperation by local and state officials in future planning activities for this corridor (pg. 136) ; The Carmel City Council desires that the Thoroughfare Map reflect the text of the Comprehensive Plan Update and identify U.S. 31 as a potential freeway . quotations from May 23, 1991, Draft of Comprehensive Plan Update 6/28/91 RESOLUTION REGARDING LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Since the Lower Density Residential category " is intended to provide opportunities for large lots/estate type single family residential development (pg. 99) ; and Since "This category is intended to preserve and maintain open space by limiting development to this lower level of intensity (pg. 99) ; and Since "Currently , no zoning categories exist which would restrict residential development to densities as low as those contemplated in the LDR plan designation when sanitary sewer service is available (pg. 99) ; and Since " It is the Plan Steering Committee's opinion that provision of areas for development of low density residential uses is important to the community (pg. 99) ; and Since " In lieu of rewriting the Zoning Ordinance at this time and/or rezoning any parcels of land, " the Steering Committee has established guidelines "when dealing with the potential inconsistencies with the LDR plan designation and underlying zoning" (pg. 99) ; The Carmel City Council desires that the guidelines state that development density in S-1 should average no more than 1 (one) unit per gross acre ; and that development density in S-2 should average no more than 1 .5 units per gross acre . quotations from May 23, 1991, Draft of Comprehensive Plan Update