Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMisc. • • CARTEL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA DOCKET : rrJJ / PETITIONER: amIN `• I FINDINGS C�' FACT - �. . Tne grant of this variance will not be contrary to the Public interest, due to the ordinance wll existence of special condition(s) such that enforcenent of the zoning result in unnecessary hardship because: The con•re•ation will be • -d to subsidize a larger buildin• than their needs resuire ant of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals T it because: the buildin• will be • I ted and general welfare of the comnnm Y . _ • -alth with smaller dimensions than required, but will meet all an• sa e y stan•ar•s . 3. The use or value of the area adjacent to the subject property will not be substan- tially affected in any adversenW1 ll noe: affeetminsuirum b ld• ro•ertuire- ments for heighth and size ners . to the subject 4. The need for the variance arises from a natural condition peculiar. . * - . - because: the con•re•atioI propo -4 ize . • • ball interfere with the Carnel- 5. The granting of this variance does not substan Y . . -C.ocrp - . rel nsive Plan because: the buildin• Claexce t for the height and size requirements imposed b Sections • • * DECISION * Board of Zoning Appeals that Variance Docket IT IS THEI�F ORE the decision is (not)Cgr��, subjectto any conditions stated in he which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. minutes of this Board, 198 Adopted this day of • ATTEST: SECRETARY, Gariel Board of CIiAI RPIAN, Board of Zoning Appeals Zoning Appeals REPRESENTATIVE TO SIGN) 1�L+C 1V..+-�EIV� ****CONDITIONS, IF ANY ARE. LISTED ON SACK. (PETITIONER OR HIS ( R) 1/17/84 --- • -- I( i ', 1.....::.:.-.::::::•:•-...:•:.:•.:•:.•:::•:•!:„Tiii i•:.:•:•:....:•.: • --_ _ . . • IL � 1. _ ./\\H--t-- : , ., L:.. II ;1 1 ,,� i� ••• \, ,:__ M A a.....:.... R- i .,...:„:•.:...,.:•.••:....:•..,•:•:..,..•......•,.....:.:...::•...itl, ::,..:. - . -- _ ..... ...............:.......... ' `, ♦ ( ......., I .V /, , it .....::.::.:-.:::....-.......-...:..:.: .• ••• . . ............................ .............: ..._H ,..\--..---* ...„.... .. ii, F ::_......44...,(e„.•;:,......\.,:\ .\,_„\.:„.........--___,.......... _ i._ ji (// rte-/ \ ., / !."--17—•.)11. \' } .� 1 .\-..,,...,, , '� ♦ . ! Y 1, '` ,/ '_' ^ — , .� �y� -. ff ... ...... .. ,, ,- i- '-i 1. L .� 2 4c- • . . .. \lJI !`l ,\ ) , dik - i _ L /i :: y i [• ---. . . / '. ' k7-.)....--- %, \'' Via. • • • ••• - . 1.--- -- , , 1 I i . --v ./ ' '.". \f' ._)h_L_____—_ 14* ./., , ter yY L.....1<-7L-"\-I ,1 � a_2 I_�. v•li ,smoKEY FOW 1 :. ,--.-----•.•----,•-.-.-.-•:••.---:••••••:•••.••••••••••• .••.•.:..:... •....... .............,. f-- i 1 B *ILI___1 r__ ,.,.,.:7 - 1., . 7 / • i i 1_13,ZI.k- I ;;;,21‹.7..:11. ':::::.:::Ill.t.g.:.11:: :::::::111...: :i.:::1:'.1.:l:f.1.:1.:;::1-::.1::: :1::::::::::.1.% r; t r , a . .L_I___ ..7J . ..i1 IT' , ';, , ,:f '.'1.- 1 6.4Esti! ME . _ . ill L le...5--.\:- 4,:_-, 5 1 i ,._.L..._ , f,-- 1 1 ' - : ------ . -- B't . - . /- TO . "if- -H ) • ' '.•'--" i.-4---1 . R-5 1 B-2 . -,./..' 0 , jl. ,---N i R.-?- - q.--, _ .rg f.__ . . , ,, - - / , I i I ! -,) _ •• gr B 2 R I . a i ! ; ; ; I ! i - �s �m B_5 s:2 ' 1 N>\ I I`i I U� - �� � A. ,3 a, , .. // T,1, i --- I- - _. / •1` !! r r STATEMENT OF VARIANCE APPLIED FOR Petitioner is requesting a variance from o the DeVelopmeStal Standards established by the U.S. Highway Overlay Sec- tion 23.01 of Carmel Zoning Ordinance. Section 23.01-10.2 requires a minimum building height of 14 feet for all uses, with a minimum of 12 feet to the lowest eaves for sa a variance with a to build ale, hip or church witgambrel a height of 10Pfeet Petitioner seeks Section 23.10-10.8 requires that all buildings have a mini- mum of 15 ,000 sq. ft. of floor area. Petitioner proposes to build a church with 3 ,802 sq. ft. of floor area. STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP Petitioner is a not-for-profit religious organization with a small but devoted and conscientious congregation. The church members have spent many months working on a design and layout for their church. The design is consistent with surrounding build- ings and promotes the overall aesthetic qualities of the U.S. Highway 31 Overlay Zone. The only variance is for height and size, with the height variance being minimal. The congregation cannot justify monetarily constructing a church with 15,000 sq. ft. and it would suffer severe hardship if it were required to construct a larger building. CARMEL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA DOCKET NO _ V 30 - " PETITIONER C FINDINGS OF FACT -- DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE 1. 2. 3. DATED TH I S DAY OF 1 9 8 6 BOARD MEMBER 5 / 86