HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings of Fact •
•
• CARiL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
DOCKET NO: -44 -
V 8 CARMEL, INDIANA
PETITIONER: James B. Carr, D.D.S.
FINDINGS OF FACT - VARIANCE.
1. The grant of this variance will not be contrary to the public interest, due to the
,existence of special condition(s) such that enforcerent of the zoning ordinance will
result in unnecessary hardship because: thesign ordinance provides that businesses
located on double frontage lots are permitted two identification signs, but
only one sign shall face any particular property frontage. Applicant has a
wall sign which can be seen from the same direction as the proposed ground
2. The grant of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals sign
and general welfare of the comrnmity because: the requested variance is a
slight deviation from sign ordinance 25. 7. 04-1 (b)
3. The use or value of the area adjacent to the subject property will not be substan-
tially affected in any adverse manner because: the sign is unobstrusive and
complements the general character of the area.
4. The need for the variance arises from a natural condition peculiar to the subject
because: the office building sits on a curve in the street and applicant
currently has a small wall sign near the door of his office building.
5. The granting of this variance does not substantially interfere with the Camel-
Clay Comprehensive Plan because: it does not materially alter the plan in
any way.
• * DECISION *
IT IS TEE.FTORE the decision of the Camel Board of Zoning Appeals that Variance Docket
ND. V 1 —IBaardis 401* granted, subject to any conditions stated in the
minutes of this , which are incorporated herein • -ference and made a part hereof.
Adopted this ( day of I rr41111f
4 ib. . tikiis.a
/fref
ATTEST:
`r 2 .- 4, ,
sig...., Carnal Board of
CHAIRMAN, Board of Zoning Appeals
Zoning Appeals
****CONDITIONS, IF ANY ARE LISTED ON BACK. (PJT1TIONER OR HIS (HER) REPRESENTATIVE TO SIGN)
1/17/84
CARMEL BOARD OF
ZONING APPEALS
CARMEL INDIANA
DOCKET NO _ -44 - S 6
PETITIONER : li_ `4 /
Ail
FINDINGS OF FACT -- DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE
, t_,
„):
. .„.,„
/jA,
��/tre..0...0.—
t.40,
. '/6:
/ , J
0,, ,
....,,
41
j • c.4,41.44jaws
j
ft
2.
/(f r
3.
DATED THIS _______DAY OP7
1 9 846
7Z_._.____________.________
", 1 47.7 0
v.
BOARD MEMBER
5 / 86
CARMEL BOARD OF
ZONING APPEALS
CARMEL, INDIANA
DOCKET NO . -44 _
PETITIONER : if
FINDINGS OF FACT -- DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE
2.
3.
L
L i`
/ Y _4. ,
f �r
DATED THIS DAY OF
��� �� 1986
e
BOARD MEMS R
5/ 86
CARMEL BOARD OP
ZONING APPEALS
CARMEL, =NDTANA
DOCKET NO . L� _
c1
PETITIONER : \
if
/ FINDINGS OF FACT -- DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE
,
1. � 441, -�.. .imht � i,4 �/ '4 :fill
NITermaresemm�. �► Vii ;`� �J �'
( -yawn" wor NO . �
l�
2. , rl
3.
y
DATED THIS
DAY OF
198
4 ,,
Aar ,----
BOARD MEMBER
5 / 86
CARMEL BOARD OF ZONING
APPEALS
CARMEL, INDIANA
,DOCKET NO . L� -
PETITIONER : ,, ` Aff.'�
FINDINGS OF FACT -- DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE
1.
2.
3.
DATED THIS ;4; DAY
071,0"
1986
41W4-0
BOARD MEMBER
5/ 86
CARMEL BOARD OF
ZONING APPEAL S
CARMEL INDIANA
DOCKET NO - -44 -
PETITIONER : `
FINDINGS OF FACT -- DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE
1.
2.
3.
DATED THIS ; `
DAY OF
9
/0-7 f4_,CieLt_aj
BOARD MEMBER
5 / 86