HomeMy WebLinkAboutComparison Between Scenarios COMPARISON BETWEEN SCENARIOS
CARMEL/CLAY TOWNSHIP, INDIANA
1985 PLAN I CONCEPT A '
LDR=40% LDR=41%
...11 ..:::... :41Ielki
SU=1% oq// P/SP=1%
MDR=41% • r RC/0= 4%
LC/0=4% MDR=44% HDR=3%
HDR=3%
LAND USE DESIGNATIONS:
A/R: AGRICULTURAL/RESIDENTIAL I/M: INDUSTRIAL/MANUFACTURING
LDR: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL P/SP: PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC
MDR: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL R/OS: RECREATION/OPEN SPACE
HDR: HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TA: TRANSITION AREAS
LC/O: LOCAL COMMERCIAL/OFFICE SU: SPECIAL USE
RC/O: REGIONAL COMMERCIAL/OFFICE
CONCEPT B 1
CONCEPT C
LDR=39% � � LDR=38%
:. :..
yi P/SP=2% `,'c%i✓/� R/OS=3%
oa �/\\\,‘„,,...._ /�/ �j I/M=2%
co �/ MDR-41% s's'9r. RC/0=5%
MDR=42%
��s LC/O=3%
HDR=6% LC/O=5%
HDR=4%
SOURCE: HNTB
COMPARISON BETWEEN 1985 PLAN
AND 1990 AMENDMENT PLAN
LDR -1111111111.1111111111.11111111.11.1111.1.1111111111,1
MDR
HDR
LC/0
RC/O �-
I/M
P/SP
R/OS 1
TA _7 _ -
su
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
THOUSANDS OF ACRES
SCENARIOS
1985 PLAN 1990 PLAN
SOURCE: HNTB
COMPARISON BETWEEN EXISTING ZONING
AND 1990 AMENDMENT PLAN
LDR
MDR I
k.
HDR
LC/0 ti
RC/0
I/M
P/SP
R/OS
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
THOUSANDS OF ACRES
SCENARIOS
EXISTING ZONING I i 1990 PLAN
SOURCE: HNTB
COMPARISON BETWEEN SCENARIOS
CARMEL/CLAY TOWNSHIP, INDIANA
EXISTING LAND USE EXISTING ZONING
A/R=56%
LDR= 71%
P/SP=2%=1% //% I/M=3%
I/M
LI a
f Dili// 1%
0=% je, RC/0=3%
HDR=2% LC/p1 %
LDR= 12%\ F HDR
MDR=24% MDR=20%
LAND USE DESIGNATIONS:
A/R: AGRICULTURAL/RESIDENTIAL I/M: INDUSTRIAL/MANUFACTURING
LDR: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL P/SP: PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC
MDR: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL R/OS: RECREATION/OPEN SPACE
HDR: HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TA: TRANSITION AREAS
LC/O: LOCAL COMMERCIAL/OFFICE SU: SPECIAL USE
RC/O: REGIONAL COMMERCIAL/OFFICE
1985 PLAN 1990 AMENDMENT
=40% LDR=36%
N
SU=1%
TA=3% R/OS=5%
R/OS=2% s, — P/SP=2%
� I/M=2% MDR= 42% t./' I/M= 1%
MDR=41% '� � RC/0=4% ///'' RC/0=8%
ii{fh —
HDR=3% HDI1C 3%
SOURCE: HNTB