The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFindings of Fact 015-00 SW CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION Carmel, Indiana SUBDIVISION VARIANCE FINDINGS OF FACT Docket No: /g: )814 Petitioner: ; ' 4,Urc� Section V ce: SCS Brief Description of Variance: I H/LI4 e i t 3-"er ,g1.67kJ ? S'/.(F'L-C!}3' /e?). In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of a variance,the Plan Commission should consider the following: The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health,safety,morals and general welfare of the community. The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood. The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought. The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the comprehensive plan. b///t Based on all the evidenceresented bythe petitioner,I approve of P the requested subdivision variance. I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. Dated this G 5 day of ,2' . s:\forms\subvarfindfact.frm2000 omi rnssl 7n Member CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION Cannel, Indiana SUBDIVISION VARIANCE FINDINGS OF FACT Docket No: / ' skL Petitioner: def ,4',ure- Section V ce: SC_C) F ? Brief Description of Variance: &l'H tki 4-7Zr Cu efST-r ,-)&77Z-74-.. .4/1_07L/C, .C(X.-t2./ /e' In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of a variance,the Plan Commission should consider the following: The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health,safety,morals and general welfare of the community. The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood. The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought. The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the comprehensive plan. ✓ Based on all the evidence presented by the petitioner, I approve of the requested subdivision variance. I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. Dated this day of / `e./ 2001 , s:\forms\subvarfindfact.frm2000 Commission Met ,,er CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION Carmel, Indiana SUBDIVISION VARIANCE FINDINGS OF FACT Docket No: / ' O )8kL Petitioner: £v 4 ii Section Var ce: cF 3' Brief Description of Variance: ell H I,&l4 Cv.�'iS�' c`i r� °S . /.4771F S'/.(tpi /eP- In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of a variance,the Plan Commission should consider the following: The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health,safety, morals and general welfare of the community. The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood. The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought. The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the comprehensive plan. Based on all the evidence presented by the petitioner, I approve of the requested subdivision variance. I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. Dated this day of g- -r r � ,20 c)c" s:\forms\subvarfindfact.frm2000 Commission Mem oer CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION Cannel, Indiana SUBDIVISION VARIANCE FINDINGS OF FACT Docket No: /6.74:34:::)Eiti Petitioner: , ;f , u) Section Vai nce: F ? Brief Description of Variance: -6'2./M1,cf*TZ� Cc422 '-r 4.1-01/F S'/,r r171-4173- i'b. In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of a variance,the Plan Commission should consider the following: The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health,safety, morals and general welfare of the community. The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood. The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought. The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the comprehensive plan. Based on all the evidence presented by the petitioner,I approve of the requested subdivision variance. I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. Dated this IS- day of , 200. 6444.4-414,AA4A_0 s:\forms\subvarfindfact.frm2000 Commission Member CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION Cannel, Indiana SUBDIVISION VARIANCE FINDINGS OF FACT Docket No: /611:4C0�ki Petitioner: ;T Section V ' ce: SrO F ? Brief Description of Variance: /Ai C61. 4 r ''e/7 ' 47,C01(F S'/-,(g-71%(175— /. In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of a variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following: The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health,safety,morals and general welfare of the community. The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood. The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought. The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the comprehensive plan. Based on all the evidence presented by the petitioner,I approve of the requested subdivision variance. I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. Dated this /5 day of 20 s:\forms\subvarfindfact.frm2000 Commiss'on ember • CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION Carmel, Indiana SUBDIVISION VARIANCE FINDINGS OF FACT Docket No: /5":74C:Cis S Petitioner: , � :44ti Section Var• ce: Brief Description of Variance: Ez tt-t tA.(4 CcJi& r f,'fi.77-6-7x1- 47,1_011F S'/K'tp' In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of a variance,the Plan Commission should consider the following: The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health,safety,morals and general welfare of the community. - The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood. - The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought. The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the comprehensive plan. Based on all the evidence presented by the petitioner,I approve of the requested subdivision variance. I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. Dated this i j%7 day of 1-•1/T' ,20 r--7 s:\forms\subvarfindfact.frm2000 Commission Member CARMEL,/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION Cannel, Indiana SUBDIVISION VARIANCE ' � � FINDINGS OF FACT Docket No: /5:cx , k1 Petitioner: 5 .�f',ci;tcU Section V ce: F Brief Description of Variance: -e;z.ft-I/A.l417r Cu,e- ,Der7f—Fer- .42&"V4- 0/(r2�t ' /e'' . In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of a variance,the Plan Commission should consider the following: The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health,safety,morals and general welfare of the community. The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood. The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought. - The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the comprehensive plan. Based on all the evidence presented by the petitioner,I approve of the requested subdivision variance. I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. Dated this XT. day of F _ ,20 ' / /111 , s:\forms\subvarfindfact.f m2000 Commission Member CARMEI/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION Carmel, Indiana SUBDIVISION VARIANCE FINDINGS OF FACT Docket No: /6.70C)Ski Petitioner: ,yrs 4,0;140-1 Section V ' ce: S a Brief Description of Variance: it-ttkt - Cu.C�i 'Y r�7� ,47,Cc,s,7J S'/(1771-X-173— . In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of a variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following: The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health,safety,morals and general welfare of the community. - The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood. The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought. The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the comprehensive plan. t�. { Based on all the evidence presented by the petitioner,I approve of the requested subdivision variance. I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. Dated this i day of , - ,20 a /1 ). s:\forms\subvarfindfact.frm2000 Commission"-Member CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION Cannel, Indiana SUBDIVISION VARIANCE FINDINGS OF FACT Docket No: /5C08kj Petitioner: , ,5 4Q, c J O C Section Var• nce: SSD ra7...H.1142,./tatf!-4,i CBrief Description of Variance: C j ! 5:ei'7rec tr .7,CuF 06(rt71-X J73' /eD In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of a variance,the Plan Commission should consider the following: The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community. The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood. - The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought. - The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the comprehensive plan. Based on all the evidence presented by the petitioner,I approve of the requested subdivision variance. I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. Dated this day of ,20 G � \ s:\forms\subvarfindfact.frm2000 oramission Member CARMEI,/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION Carmel, Indiana SUBDIVISION VARIANCE FINDINGS OF FACT Docket No: / økiv —� � 15 tr Petitioner: ;5 Section Var• ce: Sri F ? -, Brief Description of Variance: r-- '- C i4'JJ ��'�� g,1_6,--kjF rE't £ _ In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of a variance,the Plan Commission should consider the following: The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety,morals and general welfare of the community. - The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. - The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood. - The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought. The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the comprehensive plan. Based on all the evidence presented by the petitioner, I approve of the requested subdivision variance. I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. r Dated this f 4 day of 77 ,2047) 1 /4/ s:\forms\subvarfindfact.frm2000 Commission Member CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION Cannel, Indiana SUBDIVISION VARIANCE FINDINGS OF FACT Docket No: /5' CC. Sk( Petitioners Section V ce: SC0 F ? - 721; �.- Brief Description of Variance: . = C'c.eJJY �'�i� °S� S' cYkr F (fr In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of a variance,the Plan Commission should consider the following: The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health,safety, morals and general welfare of the community. - The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. - The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood. - The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought. The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the comprehensive plan. Based on all the evidence presented by the petitioner,I approve of the requested subdivision variance. I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. Dated this ! 5 day of I s L;> ,20co s:\forms\subva rfindfact.frm2000 Commission Member CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION Carmel, Indiana SUBDIVISION VARIANCE {'� / FINDINGS OF FACT Docket No: / OEkj Petitioner: ; �u� e Section V ce: F.? • Brief Description of Variance: - ":"'= Cu,2i ' �'�i7T �,1�-�14 S'/r rvi- '. In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of a variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following: The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety,morals and general welfare of the community. - The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. - The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood. The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought. The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the comprehensive plan. Based on all the evidence presented by the petitioner, I approve of the requested subdivision variance. I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. Dated this /J day of � r/.!'t"4"4 2000 xr14,( ,6.../4 s:\forms\subvarfindfact.frm2000 Commission Member CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION Cannel, Indiana SUBDIVISION VARIANCE FINDINGS OF FACT Docket No: /5" Sk(› Petitioner• ; 4Ijr Section Varnce: Sam F Brief Description of Variance: = --_ CtJei -t Fe(77 T 9.06'114; S'/r rp4.113- AJ. In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of a variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following: The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health,safety,morals and general welfare of the community. The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood. The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought. The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the comprehensive / plan. Based on all the evidence presented by the petitioner, I approve of the requested subdivision variance. I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. Dated this / day of ,20 GO A s:\forms\subvarfindfact.frm2000 Cornrnis`son Member CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION Carmel, Indiana SUBDIVISION VARIANCE � ,, FINDINGS OF FACT Docket No: ,`/ Ski Petitioner: , riz Section Var• ce: &2 F ? Brief Description of Variance: liMtu4-r r Ccf,2f r fi7i ,6'.& ii S'/,'r51-7L r 7e'• In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of a variance,the Plan Commission should consider the following: - The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community. - The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood. The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought. The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the comprehensive plan. Based on all the evidence presented by the petitioner, I approve of the requested subdivision variance. I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. Dated this /X day of K"`"?--.4 ,2015?0, s:\forms\subvarfindfact.frm2000 Commission Member CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION Carmel, Indiana SUBDIVISION VARIANCE FINDINGS OF FACT Docket No: sk1 Petitioner: , ,f4,,Ui a-A! Section Var• ce: F P Brief Description of Variance: cL i r-t t J 4-Tr7 Cc eJ -t ,416-71 S'/k"11:7MJ 3' . In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of a variance,the Plan Commission should consider the following: The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community. - The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. - The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood. - The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought. The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the comprehensive plan. Based on all the evidence presented by the petitioner, I approve of the requested subdivision variance. I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. Dated this 1-5 day of felhitta46 ,20 s:\forms\subvarfindfactfrm2000 C.j, ission Member