Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication 016-00 SW Tit — 984b6-ii:F, P.12 - OcT-13-1999 17:05 FROm ' MEL CLAY DOCL' SViDIVISMICVAPW4Ct ZILQUIST AMICATION • MONS eta(.10 tip* Camas An= C (1 5 kl Je--vs-C 01/ Tdephose tick 9216 - 0 3 6 . ed PROJECT NAME: $^5 0 \ rsoscr ADDRESS: /3 Li 9C Sp‹ ‘2.7 APPLICANT NAM: • Atoms:_23 5.3 / s,sA- tk = moe 1/‘ — 03 swim(Section Number.Per,hem)of Subdivision Regulation'for wiich vadasoe ar bang , requested: S;d4 State=plaudit:le awl,wane is bobs masted: I r - 14_e_s 0( - qv Of ih 11 0 .71fic(e_-tdct. .66 Let' a- 0-7 0 0-07..-fe._ 74 0- q...d) ILI Stszeressont supports;Viie=mutat See a bittah Proem zooiow ( /4440, siipsassag 4. parry Omar THIS APPIXATION KIST BE SUBMITTED AT THE TIME OF/HE PIRINLOT PLATI : • APPLICATION. VARIANCE REQUEST MUST BE INCLUDED WITH THE MIX NOTICE MR PRIMARY PLAT. .APPLICAIRW FEE _.__J L - NaNdmiewo ,c-7.• • • • Supporting Reasons for Variance Request for Section 8.9 Current installation of 170' of sidewalk as the first and only sidewalk section along a one half mile county road would change the nature and existing design greatly. Of greater concern would be the safety hazard it would create because the southern most end of the sidewalk would stop at the one land bridge and drop into Henley Creek. Delay of sidewalk installation until an appropriate bridge structure to handle two cars and a sidewalk would be a preferred alternative.