HomeMy WebLinkAboutLetter from Wes Bucher to Jeff Davis 8/29/89 (P-i--Q Fr,L. he
City
111 rr
of Crme
Wesley G. Bucher
DIRECTOR• DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Dorothy J.Hancock
MAYOR
August 29, 1989
Mr. Jeff Davis
President Carmel/Clay Plan Commission
R.R. 1, Box 199A
Carmel, IN 46032
Dear Jeff,
Two members of the Comp. Plan Update Committee have suggested to me that
the Sept. 12th meeting be delayed or postponed. The Indiana Association of Cities and
Towns is meeting that week in Indianapolis, and several events are scheduled that
conflict with the meeting.
The 12th has been cleared with HNTB and the firm doing the polling and looks
to be an important and full agenda of transportation and survey information. The
media and the committee members are also aware of the 12th, but all of this can be
changed.
I feel the next possible dates to meet would be Wednesday, September 20th or
Tuesday the 26th.
Alan Potasnik is the person who called me about a possible change, so you may
want to talk with him. Whatever date is decided upon, we should inform the media
no later than Friday, Sept. 1st, so that it is in the paper on Wed. the 6th. I can have
Dorothy notify the committee members.
Let me know if you want it rescheduled.
4
Sin y,
4
e—t----
Wes Bucher
1
40 EAST MAIN STREET CARMEL,INDIANA 46032 317/844-6433
Comprehensive Plan Update
Items Needing to be Addressed or Areas of Concern :
1 . Committee needs to decide the type of document (map) they
want as a final product .
-Depicting the ideal land uses for Carmel and Clay
Township (a dream plan)?
-Depicting the current land uses of Carmel and Clay
Township (current zoning)?
-Or a combination of the above two plans?
2 . Determine the method of interpretation and drafting the
map.
-Will the boundaries/colors of the land uses be site
specific or solely in recognition of a potential
need for a type of uses? ( i .e . Palmer Dodge once
proposed site)
3 . Determine how the text should read.
-Site specific or general recognition of a potential
need.
4 . Should the text of the plan match the map?
-Current map and text vary from one another i . e .
Shadybrook area.
5 . Does the committee want Transition Areas depicted on the
map?
-Some have expressed the need and desire for
flexibility in some areas?
-If yes , then where and how should the text portion
read?
-If not on the map, then perhaps a statement in the
text of the plan may be appropriate .
6 . Committee and especially the Plan Commission members need
to know and understand the need and reasoning behind the
green belt ( link) area and realize the needed commitment
of the Plan Commission in obtaining and implement this
portion as will as the overall plan.
-It may not be a bad idea to outline procedures and
methods of implementation .
HOWARD NEEDLES TAMIYIEN&
HNTB
ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS PLANNERS
NDOFF
O tool I e.o c hf 7)11:5 (T I Cam. fie a. b)kvb f cn4 w ,�-
"th e, oma- ird.c uz9 t c 4.4, a L& e.. ?
Board of Public Works & Safety December 4, 1989
City of Carmel
2 Civic Square
Carmel , Indiana 46032 I
INVOICE NO. 8 - 13139-11
CARMEL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE, 1939
VERBAL AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED RECEIVED FROM W' BUCHE' /
PLANNING SERVICES CONTRACT DATED MAY 1 , 1989
SERVICES FOR OCTOBER 28, THROUGH NOVEMBER 24, 1 .89
PERSONNEL HOURLY BILLIN
CLASSIFICATION HOURS RATE TOTAL COSTS
Project Manager 34 $63.75 $2, 167.50
Project Engineer 13 63.75 828.75
Ass 't. Project Engineer 7 48.25 337.75
Assistant Project
Landscape Architect 60 48.25 2,895.00
Staff Architect 2 41 .50 83.00
Technician IV 4 31 . 75 127.00
Secretary III 2 26.00 52 .00
122 $6,491 .00
EXPENSES:
Reproductions $105. 13
Materials & Supplies 17.50
Travel & Subsistence 110.40 233.03
$6,724.03
BALANCE UNBILLED ON INVOICE NO. 7: 58.93
$6, 782.96
AMOUNT DUE THIS INVOICE PER LETTER DATED 11/15/89 : $5,000.00
TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $60,000.00
TOTAL BILLED TO DATE: $60,000.00
TOTAL PAID TO DATE: $50,371 . 78
TOTAL OUTSTANDING: $9,628.22