Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSoil Water and Related Resource • ro-oIg ji re Port') rtIj ysav aiiieliA- _ 1-cit ' f I J -- -- _ /''1/3/N STREET _ _ L, /3 / sT, _S- T/46 ET ______ g 7 3 2 \ / 1 I 63 `'g 9?joo( 1 47 !n7 i o E� o/t!✓c !�2 � '� "F /a 0 40e,6 0 , 6S Gy 4 �� j� 13 2 Bp�SsP`t/e8 115 /l`l 61 9 3 o ,30 [�y 10 "° Sq $� -o //PAW 40 .47,A6 17111, 4, 'Y Aill P4rti 15 . '® t �. `55 II 26 `. g 411114.41,.•;• Q"" r oL 15 �o !65 it J cr SL 1( �� z0 ® /78 " s ® ebb 7 t8 al IVe. 7- . tin 59 b'I ' 84 2_4*467 4 $D , •1�c'M/3oRN� DR,J� l8 /00 3- 183 . us ��� 175 , /74 SZ / /73 172 ►1a 3 169 181 /82 i 27 -, o �r CM4 ■•W ,. �4E CRoss Rowo 3®�, .meq 1 g 1.—q, Illt a varriplik r 102 . CI a ,..1 .1 3° =i N(, c. 7 �'� •10,, u„, vi;\,_ a oleo:,o y� g� � �-y `Pa w r yYs '� . 33d g3 . 0T1 31 Cf. J 20 11 3 c �'0• 6 w! 0 3 yr , ik-cfC4 4� llir me, 3c,Asi 3/ 46 I . A /'7oMNi✓K DR. • t. - 3 % iz‘>s _5-,,, . . - , SCS—CONS-228 Rev.6.71 (File Code CONS-14) DTI, AND CAPABILITY MA P UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE 4 cooperating with " n Conservation District Owner ! Plan No. Date Operator Scale Acres • Approximate Approximate India zla Photo No. County State Location (Community, watershed, road &distance,etc.) il Jap: Cr .61111 tylp,A 44° GC, • , '``` 4,4tot' trol. Plot ' t, M4 6oil Types: rp AmB2 Aiami silt loam, (2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded, 'moderately dark colored, well drnin,, AmA - Aiami silt loam, (0 to 2 percent bpes, moderately dark colored, well drained. Br - drookston silty clay loam, (0 to 2 percent slopes), dark colored, very poorly drained. MmC2 - Miami silt loam, (6 to 12 percent sloes), eroded, moderately dark colored, well drained. CrA ,Crosby silt loam, (0 to 3 percent slopes), moderately dark colored, somewhat poorly drained. OeA - ' ley silt loam, (0 to 2 percent slopes), moderately dark colored, well drained. 611 - :.4dals silt loam, (U to 2 percent slopes), modera ely dark colored, somewhat poorly drained. FoA - ;Jox Alt loam, (0 to 2 percent Elopes), moderaely dark colored, well drained. FoC2 iox silt loam, (6 to 12 percent slopes), eroded, moderately dark colored, well drained. - Crossable £)rainage ,ay IN—CONS-5 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Rev. 51-72 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE (Formerly IN-102a) HOW TO INTERPRET YOUR SOIL MAP FOR RESOURCE PLANNING Your land is the foundation of your resource plan. Plan it within its limitations and treat it according to its needs. The Soil Conservation Service and your Soil and Water Conservation District will help you use the information in this folder to develop a resource plan for your land. The enclosed soil map shows important facts about your land. The map, together with the soil interpretations provided in the table below, will help you determine land use and treatment needs. Each soil on your land has been assigned a degree of limita- tion for uses in which you have expressed an interest. The three degrees of limitation are: Relatively free of limitations or with limitations that are easy to overcome. Limitations need to be recognized; can be overcome with correct Moderate planning, proper treatment, and good management. Limitations are severe enough to make use questionable; careful planning, proper treatment, and above average management are needed. Mapping SOIL INTERPRETATIONS AND DEGREE OF LIMITATION Symbol Approximate i, , and Soil Acres Series Mrn A,OC f1- )6c- et- 5.1.-30.910-1(2/ - 5,L-30.910-1(2) (Z)Z016 O 1°5 uL61'893N'NIooNn-sos-vasn 6uluueld ao.anosad 6u0.3244d sol.slaagaeaeq aoCej alaill pue silos 4o uopdlaosaa •uo l so.aa „0„ sueaw a,an61.4 uo L soda oN ** •adols „d„ sueaw aag4al adols ON aaanas Raaf - ti 9ABAOS - £ aI.eaapoW - Z 4il6llS - l .uaaedde oN - 0 U01.s0a3 4o aaa6aa daa�s Aaan 5£ a9A0 9 daags 5£-5Z 614dols Rlaa.eaapow ZL-9 3 daa;s Ala4paapow 5Z-81 3 6uldols ifLqua6 9 -Z 8 64dols 41.6uoa4s 8L-ZL 0 lanai. X'laeau Z -0 d (2ueoaad ul) adols :aldwexa uv •** uolsoaa pue `*adols ` llos 40 pull Moils dew ails uo slogw/'s SCS-CONS-5 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 2-70 FILE CODE CONS-14-5 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE INDIVIDUAL INVENTORY & EVALUATION * GROUP UNIT OF GOVERNMENT REQUESTED BY Carmel Planning Commission LOCATION Carmel SUBJECT: Brookshire North ASSISTED BY Tom Schellenberger- District Conservationist DATE January 31 , 1974 SITUATION: Lumber Mart, the developer is proposing to construct single family residences u t tz ng a pon. wt an o. . . . •• - • • • - • . and roll curb and gutter sections with storm sewers and swales for the removal of the stor-- -.:-. -- _ .- - -o SOILS: The enclosed colored soils map indicate the limitations of the soils hased Upon their intended usage that being residential development with storm and sanitary sewers. The red color on the map in which the Brookston soil is located incicates a severe limitation. This soil is characteristic of having a seasonal high water table which is normally less than 1 foot from the surface of the soil in December through May, the permeability is moderate or moderately slow, the soil properties intcrfcrc with satisfactory disposal of subsurface water through the normal perculation into the lower soil profile. The yellow is indicated in two different soil types, the Crosby soil is a soil which also has a seasonal high water table condition similar to the Brook- ston but not quite as severe. The treatment of this soil would be approximately be the same as for the Brookston soil . the other area with the yellow colore is Miami soil on a 6 to 12% slope, this soil is well drained however the major limilalion here is the erodibiiity of the soil especially during the construction period. The green color on the map indicates two soil types the Miami soil on a 2 0 to 2% slope and the Miami soil with a 2 to 6% slope. These have very slight limitations for the intended use. These conditions have been discussed with wary Kern the engineer from Weihe engineering and in his attempt to overcome some of the problems he has tried to locale tie dorm sewers in the more severe or as however it was pointed out to him also in a discussion with Micky Swanson of Lumber Mart this SUGGESTED SOLUTION(S): condition was also pointed out and the indication here is that people are going to have deep crawl spaces or basements that they could experience subsurface drainage problems. It Is generally not acceptable to drain the sump pumps where required for either crawl spaces or basements into the street gutters of into the swale, nci-t-her one of these arc designed for that purpose. Con- sideration is being given however by Mr. Swanson to provide some means for these people to outlet their sump pumps into properely designed systems. As you can see there is quite a large flood plain area and their present feeling is to leave this as it is and to retain it in its natural beauty. Concerning the offsite Di drainage, there is presentiy a legal drain in a number of areas on this tract and the engineer has come up with a drainage approach Io provide an offsite drainage plan and has been working with the drainage Board in order to satisfactory come up with an approach to provide for proper drainage and the easements thereto. Prior to making this report I contacted Bob Clements of the County Surveyors Office and he is forwarding his suggestions to the commissions for their consideration of the offsite drainage system. There are a number of considerations however that should be Implemented at * Circle appropriate category. SCS-CONS-5 2-70 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FILE CODE CONS-14-5 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE INDIVIDUAL INVENTORY & EVALUATION * GROUP UNIT OF GOVERNMENT REQUESTED BY LOCATION ASSISTED BY DATE SITUATION: the time that the final plan is forwarded to the commissions and that being a method of outletting the storm sewers into the flood plain area or the stream as to prevent against erosion from the outletting of the storm sewers. Secondly an erosion control program for before, during, and following constrructlot to minimize soil erosion on the sites and to prevent soil from entering the streets, storm scwcr, and eventually into the stream. Thirdly some method of providing homeowners who have sump pumps an affective outlet into a storm sewer or a subsurface drainage system. Fourthly a program to stablize the erosion on the offsite open ditch and to stabilize the banks of the proposed lake. These can be effectively done as each section comes in for i**J final platting. SUGGESTED SOLUTION(S): * Circle appropriate category. SERVICES REPORT (Please Return to , - - - = By / 74=` te'G1zrh.l t'. 3 Petitioner Lumber Mart Inc. Service Soil Conservation Service Project Name Bro hjre No th Facility Location between 126th and 131st Location Streets west9f Gray Road Facility Capacity No. Residential Units 182 % of Capacity in Use Geographical Area 97 Acres Changes required in facilities/area to serve project: ;•—, Peculiar problems presented by project (if any) : Plans for expansion of facilities or services (if any) : Additional comments : Date /-7077 Signe Title SCS-CONS-5 _ • 2-70 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FILE CODE CONS-14-5 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE INDIVIDUAL INVENTORY & EVALUATION * GROUP UNIT OF GOVERNMENT REQUESTED BYCa rme l Planning Commission LOCATION Ca rme l SUBJECT: Brookshire North ASSISTED BY Tom Schellenherger, District Conservationist DATE June 4, 1974 SITUATION: This is an addendum to the earlier report on this preliminary plot. The Chairman of the Subdivision Committee requested the review of the changed drainage plan. This plan calls for an 18 inch R.C.P. instead of the large proposed open ditch. For many reasons, this approach appears to be a more reasonable approach because of the depth and stability of the banks - ie gravel underlays thc soil mainly ncar Cool Crock whcrc the open ditch would I� have been very deep and very wide. The 18 inch R.C.P. appears to be small . However, not knowing the amount of storase retention or total watershed area it is diffcult to tell . The point made is this - just looking at the area on the plans and due to the fact that the 15 inch tile that serves quite a large area above this tract also dumps into the Id inch, it appears to be small in size. Also, will the 18 inch serve as an outlet for the underdevloped area. It obviously has to provide as an outlet in its present undeveloped stage. If not then where will the outlet be for the undeveloped area? The plans only show one easement to Cool Creek and that is where the present 18 inch proposed tile goes. Obviously, the developer's engineer has given these questions consideration and not having discussed this with them since the changes, it Is unclear how they propose to do it. Une other concern - will easements be provided for adjacent lands or landowners to be able to drain into thc retention rcscvoir or install storm drains. There is considerable watershed area adjacent to this proposed development that will need access to Cool Creek. Realizing that it is not this developers responsibility to provide storm drains of sufficient size for adjacent development, however, these adjacent landowners need easements accross Brookshire North to get to 11 Cool Creek. SUGGESTED SOLUTION(S): % Vt _, * Circle appropriate category. INC .WEIHE EN GINEERS ALLAN H. WElHE, P.E., L.S. PRESIDENT 10505 N. COLLEGE INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46280 317-846-6611 January 13, 1977 TO: Mr. Fred Hohl Copy: Lumber Mart Inc. Summary of Drainage - Brookshire North Description of Project: The multi-phased project involved here covers 160 acres, precisely, the Southeast Quarter of Section 26t Township Street and 131st RangeNorth, Streeast of, lying west of Gray Road between 1 Carmel, in Clay Township, Hamilton County. Cool Creek, a major stream, crosses the project tract, at the west and runnineast of the southwestg corner of thesoutheasterly, crossing 126th Street about 750 feet Quarter Section. The flood plain of this stream covers about 20 acres of the tract, most of which is unsuitable for building sites. The bulk of the ground lies on an upland plateau east of Cool Creek. Gray Road, running the length of the project on the east, is in the approx- imate center of sump areas on this project and the adjoining ground to the east. The elevation of the sump area is only 10' - 12' above the average elevation of the Cool Creek low ground. The lowest ridge ground between the sump and the creek is about 7 feet above the sump elevation. However, the lowest ridge ground to the southeast is only about 4 feet above the same sump elevation. This low ridge is located approximately 350 feet east of Gray Road in presently undeveloped ground. In a flood situation storm water would drain south to a gravel pit of approximately 60 acres in water area. Said gravel pit is located south of 126th Street and east of Gray Road and receives drainage from a watershed of about 132 acres. The sump areas along Gray Road collect water from approximately 100 acres and have no surface outlet during normal conditions. Drainage is accomplished by means of a "legal drain" tile, which drains southwesterly (Continued) CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND SURVEYORS LAND PLANNERS The "legal drain" also extends from the sump areas to Cool Creek. easement of 1te feet. Mustard Drain, be northeast to 131st Street and carries that thisutory drain, and drained through It was proposed and duly the proposed project vacated in the portion through the project storm drainage. At this point in time,c Brookshire North, Sections I, II, and III, except for the houses which 1 CreekerMosttruction. of Section have been completed Sections I and II achieve drainage directly to with 26. 5 III and proposed sections to the south do not have direct access to Cool Creek. This ground, approximately 51. 6 acres, together acresthe north, 2 . 1 acres to the northeast and 26. 0 acres to the " retention basin being constructed eastast alll will beedrained "d to a dry along the west side of Gray Road between Section III and Section IV. a g the relocated It was intended that the dry basin beendetermined that the relocated Mustard Drain. However, 1 capacity to handle dry drain, now in place, will be inadequate in cap 1 i y paralleling le the they basin. It has been determined that a seconthe inadequate section. re- located drain, must be constructed to by-pass for This drainage plan is reflected on the current construction plans Section IV. The drainage concept for this watershed was designed with the following capabilities: 1. Brookshire North - 51. 6 acres developed condition. 2. 26. 5 acres north of 131st Street and west of Gray handle 25 cfs fom undeveloped condition. System can the 27" pipe built to accept this drainage. 3. 20. 1 acres north of 131st Street and east of Gray Road undeveloped condition. 4. 26. 0 acres east of Gray Road and south of 131st Street with typical single family development. (This ground is presently farm ground. ) Pipe under Gray Road to dry basin may not be adequate in developed condition. The proposed retention basin with the sewers as shown on Section IV construction plans is designed to handle a 100 year storm without danger to residences. In the event the basin drain failed to operate adequately due to block- age, etc. , the flood waters would reach elevation 787. 3 approximately before flowing overland to the south, southeast towards the gravel pit mentioned above. This is, of course, referring to the present undeveloped condition of the ground east of Gray Road. The lowest building pad being (Continued) proposed in Brookshire North, Sections III and IV is 788. 5• Low elevation on Gray Road is 786. 3. normal conditions, design computations indicate Considering will result in a high water elevation n that a . 0n inethe basin,ar hour storm year one hour storm one hundred (l i ao f 7 high 0 rhe a fifty (50) result in a high water elevation of 786. 2 in 0) water elevation of 784. 7 in the basin and year one hour storm; will the basin.