HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket for BZA 11-26-18
ICT, LLC
Freddy’s Frozen Custard & Steakburgers
Docket Numbers 18100003 V and 18100004 V
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE REQUESTS
CITY OF CARMEL, INDIANA
November 26, 2018
Board of Zoning Appeals
Hearing Officer
Applicant: ICT, LLC
Attorneys – Nelson & Frankenberger, LLC
Rick Lawrence, Attorney
Matt Pleasant, AICP, Land Use Professional
317.844.0106
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Explanation of Request
2. Aerial Location Map
3. Zoning Map
4. Site Plan
5. Landscape Plan
6. Conceptional Elevations
7. Ballot Sheet and Findings of Fact for Docket No. 18100003 V
- Minimum greenbelt along US 421: 19-foot width requested
8. Ballot Sheet and Findings of Fact for Docket No. 18100004V
- Drive-Thru location: North side of building requested
TAB 1
TAB 2
Freddy’s Frozen Custard Site
Site Location Map / Aerial Photograph
NORTH
SITE
TAB 3
Freddy’s Frozen Custard Site
Zoning Map
NORTH
SITE
TAB 4
TAB 5
TAB 6
TAB 7
CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS – HEARING OFFICER
BALLOT SHEET for FINDINGS OF FACT – VARIANCE
Docket No.: 18100003 V – Variance from UDO Section 3.91.A: Minimum 30’ wide greenbelt along US
421 required to 19’ width proposed.
Petitioner: ICT , LLC
1.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
2.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
3.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
DATED THIS 26th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2018.
__________________________________________________
Hearing Officer
CARMEL ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS – HEARING OFFICER
CARMEL, INDIANA
Docket No.: 18100003 V – Variance from UDO Section 3.91.A: Minimum 30’ wide greenbelt along
US 421 required to 19’ width proposed.
Petitioner: ICT, LLC
FINDINGS OF FACT – DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE
1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general
welfare of the community because:
The requested variance is necessary in order to develop the real estate for a restaurant with a
drive-thru window, consistent with other business and commercial uses in the general vicinity.
As a result, approval of the variances will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals
and general welfare of the community.
2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in
a substantially adverse manner because:
The requested variance is necessary in order to develop the real estate for a restaurant with a
drive-thru window. The uses along the Michigan Road corridor and are business and
commercial in nature and proposed new use is consistent with those business and commercial
uses, including restaurant uses with drive-thru windows. As a result, approval of the variances
will not impact the areas adjacent to the property in a substantially adverse manner.
3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical
difficulties in the use of the property because:
The strict application of terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in a practical
difficulty because the applicant will be unable to design an efficient and effective site
circulation plan for the proposed building and uses permitted by the underlying zoning.
DECISION
IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals that Development Standards
Variance Docket No. 18100003 V is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this
meeting, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof.
Adopted this 26th day of November, 2018
____________________________________________________
CHAIRPERSON, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals Member
________________________________________
SECRETARY, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals
Conditions of the Board are listed on the back. (Petitioner or his representative to sign).
TAB 8
CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS – HEARING OFFICER
BALLOT SHEET for FINDINGS OF FACT – VARIANCE
Docket No.: 18100004 V – Variance from UDO Section 3.95.F: Drive-Thru location at rear of tract
required to North side of building requested.
Petitioner: ICT , LLC
1.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
2.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
3.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
DATED THIS 26th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2018.
__________________________________________________
Hearing Officer
CARMEL ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS – HEARING OFFICER
CARMEL, INDIANA
Docket No.: 18100004 V – Variance from UDO Section 3.95.F: Drive-Thru location at rear of tract
required to North side of building requested.
Petitioner: ICT, LLC
FINDINGS OF FACT – DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE
1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general
welfare of the community because:
The requested variance is necessary in order to develop the real estate for a restaurant with a
drive-thru window, consistent with other business and commercial uses in the general vicinity.
As a result, approval of the variances will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals
and general welfare of the community.
2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in
a substantially adverse manner because:
The requested variance is necessary in order to develop the real estate for a restaurant with a
drive-thru window. The uses along the Michigan Road corridor and are business and
commercial in nature and proposed new use is consistent with those business and commercial
uses, including restaurant uses with drive-thru windows. As a result, approval of the variances
will not impact the areas adjacent to the property in a substantially adverse manner.
3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical
difficulties in the use of the property because:
The strict application of terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in a practical
difficulty because the applicant will be unable to design an efficient and effective site
circulation plan for the proposed building and uses permitted by the underlying zoning.
DECISION
IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals that Development Standards
Variance Docket No. 18100004 V is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this
meeting, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof.
Adopted this 26th day of November, 2018
____________________________________________________
CHAIRPERSON, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals Member
________________________________________
SECRETARY, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals
Conditions of the Board are listed on the back. (Petitioner or his representative to sign).