Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes COM 11-08-18 Committee Comments: John Adams • The section of the third floor that has rooftop units is open-air correct? • Chris Winkle-Yes. • The other half has sections that are open. How will the rooms for the groom,bride,and bathrooms be covered? • Chris Winkle-The section spanning from the groom's room to the bride's room will be roofed.The two corners labeled storage and vestibule will also be enclosed. • It will be a flat roof? • Chris Winkle-Yes. It will be a sloped roof,with water being caught by gutters or downspouts. A roof drain system will be present. • I am concerned with the covered rooftop areas that are flush with the walls of the third story. • Chris Winkle-Our engineers are having a little trouble with the design. I imagine there will be a foot gap between the roof and walls. • Rachel Keesling-Staff will ensure it is correct. Alan Potasnik • There will be no kitchen? • Chris Winkle-Correct. • But there will be a catering space?Closet 2 is meant for the catering area? • Chris Winkle-There will be a catering space and Closet 2 is meant for table and chairs. • Food will be trucked in or brought in? • Chris Winkle-Correct. And the side door for the catering space stems from complaints and critiques of previous models. • I am assuming trucks will pull up next to that door to unload?No semi's will pull up? • Chris Winkle-There is no staging area for trucks.A sidewalk serves that side door.The largest vehicle that will ever arrive is a box truck. John motions to approve Docket No. 18080015,Tom seconds,motion passes 3-0.Absent Campbell. 3. Docket No. 18100009 ADLS Amend: Grand &Main Retail The applicant seeks site plan and design approval for a new,one story,multi-tenant retail building totaling 11,350 sq. ft., on 1.32 acres.The site is located at the southwest corner of Grand Blvd. and Main Street.It is zoned PUD within The District PUD. It is not located in any overlay zone. Filed by Adam Hill of Lor Corporation, owner. Petitioner: Joshua Mazur(Studio M) • The space has gone through this process already,however,the original investor decided not to move forward with the project in this area. A couple of the partners picked up the project and continued the development but with some changes. • There has been a slight increase in gross square footage of the building.This has been offset with less paving on the site. • A façade change has also occurred. The original project was mostly EIFS with a traditional cornice line. The two styles have been blended together. • I have not received any comments from the Technical Advisory Committee(TAC)members. Department Report: Rachel Keesling • This project came through Plan Commission on December 19,2017(Docket No. 17100028). • The District(Z-587-14)Planned Unit Development(PUD)requires modern architecture.The previous architect had issues with meeting this requirement. This version does not have any issues meeting the four-sided architecture requirements. Staff likes the look of the building. It seems balanced and symmetrical even though it is not. • The materials used blend well together. • Joshua Mazur showed the material boards(Page 9 of Submitted Packet). Commercial Committee Minutes 11-08-18 4 • The same pallet of materials will be used on all four sides of the building. • The site plan is the same as the previous petition. It is brought up to the corner of Grand Blvd. and Main St.The parking is around the side and behind the building. • There are two vehicular entrances to the site. I • A sign package has been created and the spandrel panels have been identified and measured. • There is unique detailing in having the building materials brought down into the windows. The light grey facade is offset with the dark steel beams. • Two comments given in the Department Report were:. o Update Staff with TAC member comments. o There was a question about a ground sign. This will not occur and a new site plan without a ground sign will be provided. • Staff recommends approval tonight Committee Comments: John Adams • I am having trouble telling the how far the window shades are from the building? • Joshua Mazur-They are 4-ft. in depth. • They look like they are perfectly horizontal. Is that correct? • Joshua Mazur-That is correct. They are a part of the store front system. • It seems like the same design is used for each tenant,with regards to the awnings. • Joshua Mazur- Some of the awnings are broken and some are continuous. Torn motions to approve Docket No. 18100009,John seconds,motion passes 3-0.Absent Campbell. Tom Kegley • The whole area is a PUD?Edward Rose and the Olivia? • Rachel Keesling-The Olivia is not,but everything else is.A more modern style of architecture is required. • We are still working through the ADLS's within the PUD? • Rachel Keesling-Correct.This is the last piece of land that Staff knew would be retail. There is a piece of land adjacent to the Olivia that Staff is not sure what it will be developed as. Meeting adjourned at 6:56 PM. ff; Nathan Chavez Recording Secretary flan Po .s i Chairman Commercial Committee Minutes 11-08-18 5