Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTraffic Operations Analysis 08-01-00 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS LONG BRANCH ESTATES HAMILTON COUNTY PREPARED FOR PLATINUM PROPERTIES AUGUST 2000 HT • A&F ENGINEERING CO., LLC CONSULTING ENGINEERS 8425 KEY'STONE CROSSING, SUITE 200 f ; INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46240 J _ 2 �, J T U - ! % �_v ,' _' 1 - \ 1 71 _)1 , � �� vo 2 � k • ,, ,,c) 1� ' �L F ? ,,? i, j r I_ �� 1 < �� ��} \��� kms" , I - U'� , 1 a s ,, U?', _ _ ',> �i J 0 2 . � k J a I .. _ ', U 1 -, �� \ tom✓ t-, .) ,N ') , 2 J S I� / 7 d _ r )� -r :,J_ H �', -� ,c � - . )7 ) .0 '� �_ ,-', �}, \ Q� �' � - , l I I , ) � i � i s I �, H� 6 _ 2 �. . �' r C ?� v r 2 , 'S - - 1 �' �) , 1_ ), J - v�, 1 )( J--I \‘, l - / $ R �� c "H 6' �i r '- V i' ( - - J , - \ d �� , ( - ti 1 _- /� 1s 1 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS LONG BRANCH ESTATES HAMILTON COUNTY PREPARED FOR PLATINUM PROPERTIES AUGUST 2000 PREPARED BY: A & F ENGINEERING CO., LLC CONSULTING ENGINEERS 8425 KEYSTONE CROSSING, SUITE 200 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46240 PH 317-202-0864 FAx 317-202-0908 PLATINUM PROPERTIES-LONG BRANCH ESTATES TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS COPYRIGHT This Analysis and the ideas, designs and concepts contained herein are the exclusive intellectual property of A&F Engineering Co., Inc. and are not to be used or reproduced in whole or in part, without the written consent of A&F Engineering Co., Inc. ©2000, A&F Engineering Co., Inc. PLATINUM PROPERTIES-LONG BRANCH ESTATES TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES III CERTIFICATION IV INTRODUCTION 1 PURPOSE 1 SCOPE OF WORK 1 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT 2 DESCRIPTION OF FUTURE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT 4 STUDY AREA 4 DESCRIPTION OF THE ABUTTING STREET SYSTEM 4 TRAFFIC DATA 7 GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 7 TABLE 1 -GENERATED TRIPS FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 7 GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES FOR FUTURE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT 7 TABLE 2 -GENERATED TRIPS FOR FUTURE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT 7 PASS-BY TRIPS 8 INTERNAL TRIPS 8 PEAK HOUR 8 ASSIGNMENT AND DISTRIBUTION OF GENERATED TRIPS 8 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT GENERATED TRIPS ADDED TO THE STREET SYSTEM 10 SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT GENERATED TRIPS ADDED TO THE STREET SYSTEM 10 CAPACITY ANALYSIS 10 DESCRIPTION OF LEVELS OF SERVICE 13 CAPACITY ANALYSES SCENARIOS 15 TABLE 3 -LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY-MICHIGAN ROAD AND 116TH STREET 19 TABLE 4 -LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY-MICHIGAN ROAD AND 121ST STREET 20 TABLE 5 -LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY-116TH STREET AND SOUTH ACCESS 21 TABLE 6-LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY-121ST STREET AND NORTH ACCESS 22 CONCLUSIONS 23 RECOMMENDATIONS 26 PLATINUM PROPERTIES-LONG BRANCH ESTATES TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1: AREA MAP 3 FIGURE 2: FUTURE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT 5 FIGURE 3: STUDY INTERSECTION GEOMETRICS 6 FIGURE 4: ASSIGNMENT AND DISTRIBUTION OF GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 9 FIGURE 5: GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 11 FIGURE 6: GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES FOR FUTURE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT 12 FIGURE 7: EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES 16 FIGURE 8: SUM OF EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES 17 FIGURE 9: SUM OF EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES 18 II PLATINUM PROPERTIES-LONG BRANCH ESTATES TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS CERTIFICATION I certify that this TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS has been prepared by me and under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of traffic and transportation engineering. A&F ENGINEERING Co., LLC Ste . Fehribach,P.E. Indiana Registration 890237 R. Matt Brown, E.I. Transportation Engineer III PLATINUM PROPERTIES-LONG BRANCH ESTATES TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS INTRODUCTION This TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS, prepared at the request of Platinum Properties, is for a proposed residential development that is to be located along 116t Street and 121'` Street between Shelborne Road and the Hamilton/Boone County line in Hamilton County, Indiana. PURPOSE The purpose of this analysis is to determine what effect traffic generated by the proposed development, when fully occupied, will have on the existing adjacent roadway system. This analysis will identify any roadway deficiencies that may exist today or that may occur when this site is developed. Conclusions will be reached that will determine if the roadway system can accommodate the anticipated traffic volumes or will determine the modifications that will be required to the system if it is determined there will be deficiencies in the system resulting from the increased traffic volumes. Recommendations will be made that will address the conclusions resulting from this analysis. These recommendations will address feasible roadway system improvements which will accommodate the proposed development traffic volumes such that there will be safe ingress and egress, to and from the proposed development, with minimal interference to traffic on the public street system. SCOPE OF WORK The scope of work for this analysis is: First, to obtain peak hour turning movement traffic volume counts at the following intersections: • Michigan Road and 116th Street • Michigan Road and 121st Street Second, to estimate the number of new trips that will be generated by the proposed residential development. 1 PLATINUM PROPERTIES-LONG BRANCH ESTATES TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS Third, to assign the generated traffic volumes to the driveways and/or roadways that will serve to provide access to the proposed development. Fourth, to distribute the generated traffic volumes from the proposed development onto the public roadway system and intersections which have been identified in the study area. Fifth, to prepare an analysis including a capacity analysis and level of service analysis for each intersection included in the study area for each of the following scenarios: SCENARIO 1: Existing Conditions - Based on existing roadway conditions and traffic volumes. SCENARIO 2: Proposed Development— Add the new traffic volumes that will be generated by the proposed development to the existing traffic volumes. SCENARIO 3: Proposed Development with Future Surrounding Development — Add the new traffic volumes that will be generated by future surrounding development to the traffic volumes in Scenario 2. Finally, to prepare a TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS documenting all data, analyses, conclusions and recommendations to provide for the safe and efficient movement of traffic through the study area. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT The proposed residential development is to be located along 116th Street and 121st Street between Shelborne Road and the Hamilton/Boone County line in Hamilton County, Indiana. As proposed, the development will consist of 150 single-family dwelling units. Access to the development will be provided by an access located off 116th Street and an access located along 12151 Street. Figure 1 is and area map of the site. 2 [ ..! i NOT TO SCALE z = O i U W Z Z F I- W O J m < cr Q p I 121st ST. 0 cc y II I I LU 2 Z v ' _ _ m c. I SITE I ei 1 _Ji_ L__ _ _ [ 116th ST. o cc Lu z cc 0 CO J \ LU _ CD a 0 N FIGURE 1 U x AREA MAP 0 0 0 s LONG BRANCH ESTATES g PLATINUM PROPERTIES © A & F Engineering Co., LLC 2000 "ALL Rights Reserved" V 3 PLATINUM PROPERTIES-LONG BRANCH ESTATES TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS DESCRIPTION OF FUTURE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT A 280 dwelling unit single-family residential development is planned for the parcel of land identified in Figure 2. This development, referred to as Eagle Ridge, was studied as part of a Traffic Impact Analysis' that was performed by A&F Engineering Co, LLC in 1997. STUDY AREA The study area for this analysis will include the following intersections: • Michigan Road and 116th Street • Michigan Road and 121x`Street • 116th Street and Proposed South Access • 121st Street and Proposed North Access DESCRIPTION OF THE ABUTTING STREET SYSTEM This proposed development would be served by the public roadway system that includes 116th Street and 121st Street. 116TH STREET- is a major east/west two-lane roadway. The posted speed limit in the vicinity of the site is 40 mph. The proposed development will have direct access to 116th Street. 1215[ Street — is a minor east/west two-lane roadway. The proposed development will have direct access to 121st Street. Michigan Road and 116th Street - This intersection is controlled by a traffic signal. The intersection geometrics are summarized on Figure 3. The Indiana Department of Transportation will be improving this intersection in the near future as part of the future widening of Michigan Road. The future intersection design is also graphically presented on Figure 3. Michigan Road and 12151 Street - This intersection is two-way stop controlled with 121st Street stopping for Michigan Road. The intersection geometrics are summarized on Figure 3. The Indiana Department of Transportation will be improving this intersection in the near future as part of the future widening of Michigan Road. The future intersection design is graphically presented on Figure 3. ' Traffic Impact Analysis for Eagle Ridge, A&F Engineering Co., LLC., April 1997. 4 11 I NOT TO SCALE O O U U z d Z O� F- w J CO• Q I Q 121st ST. 0 6 y0., 0 U POSED , wGLE RIDGE cc 0 DEVELOPMENT A m "79. G Cl) .N x JA 116th ST. d cc w z cc 0 co J \ '/ wI a)) 0 a N ii FIGURE 2 x FUTURE O SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT (V LONG BRANCH ESTATES 1 PLATINUM PROPERTIES © A & F Engineering Co., LLC 2000 "ALL Rights Reserved" U 5 FIGURE 3: STUDY INTERSECTION GEOMETRICS MICHIGAN ROAD AND 116th STREET EXISTING GEOMETRICS PROPOSED GEOMETRICS n \ \ � y I y 7104 y \2 _ 116th ST. \a : t 116th ST. o t o rg 4 s2 z z v ,, \ \ \ \ MICHIGAN ROAD AND 121st STREET EXISTING GEOMETRICS PROPOSED GEOMETRICS \\% 2 4 \ O `k sii°P 121st ST. —z) 1 y \.�De 121st ST. 4 ? t srh7p r` h a \ , \ \ ii - . \ 0 S 0 LONG BRANCH ESTATES PLATINUM PROPERTIES © A & F Engineering Co., LLC 2000 "ALL Rights Reserved" U 6 PLATINUM PROPERTIES-LONG BRANCH ESTATES TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS TRAFFIC DATA Peak hour manual turning movement traffic volume counts were conducted at the intersections of Michigan Road and 116th Street and Michigan Road and 121st Street by A&F Engineering Co., LLC. The traffic volume counts include an hourly total of all "through" traffic and all "turning" traffic at each intersection. The counts were made during the hours of 6:00 AM to 9:00 AM and 3:00 PM to 6:00 PM in August 2000 and are summarized in Appendix A. GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The estimate of traffic to be generated by the proposed development is a function of the development size and of the character of the land use. Trip Generation2 report was used to calculate the number of trips that will be generated by the proposed development. This report is a compilation of trip data for various land uses as collected by transportation professionals throughout the United States in order to establish the average number of trips generated by various land uses. Table 1 is a summary of the trips that will be generated by the proposed development. TABLE 1 - GENERATED TRIPS FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION GENERATED TRIPS ITE AM AM PM PM LAND USE CODE SIZE ENTER EXIT ENTER EXIT Single-Family Residential 210 150 DU 29 86 99 56 GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES FOR FUTURE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT Trip Generation report was used to calculate the number of trips that will be generated by the future surrounding development. This data is published in the previously mentioned Traffic Impact Analysis for the Eagle Ridge development and is also summarized below. TABLE 2 - GENERATED TRIPS FOR FUTURE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION GENERATED TRIPS ITE AM AM PM PM LAND USE CODE SIZE ENTER EXIT ENTER EXIT Single-Family Residential 210 280 DU 51 146 178 96 2 Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Sixth Edition, 1997. 7 PLATINUM PROPERTIES-LONG BRANCH ESTATES TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PASS-BY TRIPS Pass-by trips are trips already on the roadway system that decide to enter a land use. A residential development is a destination land use. Therefore, no reductions are applied for pass- by trips. INTERNAL TRIPS An internal trip results when a trip is made between two land uses without using the roadway system. Typically, internal trips occur in mixed-use developments. The developments analyzed in this study are residential land uses. Therefore, no reductions will be applied for internal trips. PEAK HOUR Throughout this analysis, all reference to peak hours will be from 7:00 AM to 8:00 AM and from 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM. These peak hours are based on the traffic volume counts collected at the study intersections. ASSIGNMENT AND DISTRIBUTION OF GENERATED TRIPS The study methodology used to determine the traffic volumes, from the proposed development, that will be added to the street system is defined as follows: 1. The volume of traffic that will enter and exit the site must be assigned to the various access points and to the public street system. Using the traffic volume data collected for this analysis, traffic to and from the proposed new site has been assigned to the proposed driveways and to the public street system that will be serving the site. 2. To determine the volumes of traffic that will be added to the public roadway system, the generated traffic must be distributed by direction to the public roadways at their intersection with the driveway. For the proposed development, the distribution was based on the existing traffic patterns and the assignment of generated traffic. The assignment and distribution of the generated traffic volumes for the proposed development are shown on Figure 4. 8 , LEGEND 00 = A.M. PEAK HOUR (00) = P.M. PEAK HOUR S' = NEGLIGIBLE /1 L 14% NOT TO SCALE - -- .0-1% l 41-5% 1%—► t , ul I 20%-4, h CD LCD 1 N = O U 1z °c U-1 O Z I— O _J CO m < a p = a 0 121st ST. Aa o 1 V, PROPOSED 1 w 2 EAGLE RIDGE L - _ rs O DEVELOPMENT A37 m Pe. I SITE LU cP Q j r..% 1 `� AN / L - 116th ST. p oc w Z Z-3% \ \ O M x-10% Ln o cv m 4 •c 37% 1J 4 Z 25% W 10% i r+ 5°% 1 Cl) x. M FIGURE 4 N 7 ASSIGNMENT & DISTRIBUTION 3 OF GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT O O 0 2 g LONG BRANCH ESTATES I PLATINUM PROPERTIES © A & F Engineering Co., LLC 2000 "ALL Rights Reserved" U 9 PLATINUM PROPERTIES-LONG BRANCH ESTATES TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT GENERATED TRIPS ADDED TO THE STREET SYSTEM Generated traffic volumes that can be expected from the proposed development have been prepared for the proposed access points and for the study area intersection. The peak hour generated traffic volumes are shown on Figure 5. These data are based on the previously discussed trip generation data, assignment of generated traffic, and distribution of generated traffic. SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT GENERATED TRIPS ADDED TO THE STREET SYSTEM The generated trips added to the street system from the future Eagle Ridge development were taken directly from the previously mentioned Traffic Impact Analysis conducted for this development. These generated trips are summarized on Figure 6. CAPACITY ANALYSIS The "efficiency" of an intersection is based on its ability to accommodate the traffic volumes that approach the intersection. The "efficiency" of an intersection is designated by the Level-of- Service (LOS) of the intersection. The LOS of an intersection is determined by a series of calculations commonly called a "capacity analysis". Input data into a capacity analysis include traffic volumes, intersection geometry, number and use of lanes and, in the case of signalized intersections, traffic signal timing. To determine the level of service at each of the study intersections, a capacity analysis has been made using the recognized computer program based on the Highway Capacity Manual(HCM)3. 3 Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, Update of Special Report 209, 1997. 10 LEGEND ,.=Li 00 = A.M. PEAK HOUR (00) = P.M. PEAK HOUR = NEGLIGIBLE ' ' t 12 (8) NOT TO SCALE E-1 (•) 4x4 (3) 1 1 (*) --► f ,( 1 (5) N N (Z0) 6 Z 41 ,. . . ,0 o!z 0 _1,_ t- O co m Q G. 121st ST. l 1,o G, cs. -1 I y PROPOSED I i,z 9 EAGLE RIDGE ! L _ _ 1 o o DEVELOPMENT A CO I SITE 1 %1 N _ _ J 116th ST. X A L__ AghrAdr 0 �� ES "t-2 (1) v= cc z -4-9 (6) -T m 4 (4-32 (21) 4) 41 t7 (25) W I (10) 3-> f r1 (49) 15 1 Cl) 9 -,7C-,-,,- a cCO O FIGURE 5 os 0 GENERATED TRAFFIC X VOLUMES FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT h LONG BRANCH ESTATES PLATINUM PROPERTIES © A & F Engineering Co., LLC 2000 "ALL Rights Reserved" U 11 LEGEND 00 = A.M. PEAK HOUR (00) = P.M. PEAK HOUR -9- ' = NEGUGIBLE /I v' t-17 (1 1) NOT TO SCALE C'"° "'III."'1 (t) 14x6 (4) (2) 1i f r* 1 M aD V = o U oz a O Z Cl) Ca CO < O 0 121st ST. 6 '. Q 7 PROPOSED w EAGLE RIDGE cc 130 DEVELOPMENT / m a w G Cl)= .Cp JA A 116th ST. - I W z IS--- 2-_, a coo 4, 4 r 56 (37) w cn N Q1 K O `i O N m 3 FIGURE 6 0 x GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES FOR s FUTURE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT LONG BRANCH ESTATES PLATINUM PROPERTIES © A & F Engineering Co., LLC 2000 "ALL Rights Reserved" V 12 PLATINUM PROPERTIES-LONG BRANCH ESTATES TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS DESCRIPTION OF LEVELS OF SERVICE The following descriptions are for signalized intersections: Level of Service A - describes operations with a very low delay, less than or equal to 10.0 seconds per vehicle. This occurs when progression is extremely favorable, and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Level of Service B - describes operations with delay in the range of 10.1 to 20.0 seconds per vehicle. This generally occurs with good progression. More vehicles stop than LOS A, causing higher levels of average delay. Level of Service C - describes operation with delay in the range of 20.1 seconds to 35.0 seconds per vehicle. These higher delays may result from failed progression. The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, although many still pass through the intersection without stopping. Level of Service D - describes operations with delay in the range of 35.1 to 55.0 seconds per vehicle. At level of service D, the influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combinations of unfavorable progression. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Level of Service E - describes operations with delay in the range of 55.1 to 80.0 seconds per vehicle. This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally indicate poor progression and long cycle lengths. 13 PLATINUM PROPERTIES-LONG BRANCH ESTATES TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS Level of Service F - describes operations with delay in excess of 80.0 seconds per vehicle. This is considered to be unacceptable to most drivers. This condition often occurs with oversaturation, i.e., when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be major contributing causes to such delay levels. The following list shows the delays related to the levels of service for unsignalized intersections: Level of Service Control Delay (seconds/vehicle) A Less than or equal to 10 B Between 10.1 and 15 C Between 15.1 and 25 D Between 25.1 and 35 E Between 35.1 and 50 F greater than 50 14 PLATINUM PROPERTIES-LONG BRANCH ESTATES TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS CAPACITY ANALYSES SCENARIOS To evaluate the proposed development's effect on the public street system, the traffic volumes from each of the various parts must be added together to form a series of scenarios that can be analyzed. The analysis of these scenarios determines the adequacy of the existing roadway system. From the analysis, recommendations can be made to improve the public street system so it will accommodate the increased traffic volumes. An analysis has been made for the AM peak hour and PM peak hour for each of the study intersections for each of the following scenarios: SCENARIO 1: Existing Traffic Volumes - These are the traffic volumes that were obtained in August 2000. Figure 7 is a summary of these traffic volumes at the study intersections. SCENARIO 2: Existing Traffic Volumes + Proposed Development Generated Traffic Volumes - Figure 8 is a summary of these traffic volumes at the study intersections for the peak hour. SCENARIO 3: Existing Traffic Volumes + Proposed Development Generated Traffic Volumes + Surrounding Development Trcfffic Volumes - Figure 9 is a summary of these traffic volumes at the study intersections for the peak hour. The analyses have been completed and the computer solutions showing the level of service results are included in Appendix A. The tables that are included in this report are a summary of the results of the level of service analyses and are identified as follows: Table 3—Michigan Road and 116th Street Table 4—Michigan Road and 121x`Street Table 5— 116th Street and Proposed South Access Table 6— 121st Street and Proposed North Access 15 LEGEND 00 = A.M. PEAK HOUR (00) = P.M. PEAK HOUR ' = NEGLIGIBLE /1 :1--,� °°S Z 3 (2) NOT TO SCALE N � ki0 <-10 (14) 4) 4, 41.19 (7) 13 c ) 5 5 h1' r* (11) 16-- 41 � ,.0 (42) 57-4, ^ tD t0 M Z I= = O U W Z cc O Z Co Lu O _Im Q 121st ST. 0 0 2 PROPOSED I w EAGLE RIDGE L �O DEVELOPMENT ; - m °e IsITE W J ' 1 _ _ 116th ST. ______________ ...__________/________--- 4,„,,,I. 0 (---- _._ wZ CC N=- Z20 (47) CC O ^ 235 (246) co 4) 44-61 (61) w (246) 89 5 h f (230) 227—0- o N 4 172) 140 Z "' G. o n O N o N a0 N CO 3 FIGURE 7 x EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES LONG BRANCH ESTATES PLATINUM PROPERTIES © A & F Engineering Co., LLC 2000 i "ALL Rights Reserved" 6 16 1 ,....H1 LEGEND 00 = A.M. PEAK HOUR (00) = P.M. PEAK HOUR s. = NEGLIGIBLE /1 � -d• — M 00 CDCD L- ' 1s (lo) NOT TO SCALE Na, . x-11 (14) `) 4, 4 r 23 (10) i (13) 5 1 t1 f E-32 (23) (12) 16—► N 1 (5) (42) 57 Z ^< (54) 38— h (+ —cr,— (20) 6- d IM ..- =• 0 w Z �, Z o 1- O _1 cnw m QI 0 0121st ST. AA O ik? — Yt—I1 POSED IGLE RIDGE L _ _ o 13 O DEVELOPMENT / ' m °2 I SITE I cP iiJ A AL _ _ 116th ST. r Ai o TTTT Z LoZ 22 (48) vv CN m ^ Ln <--244 (252) Q N Z 7 (25) 0 4) 4, 4 4-93 (82) 4 4-4-316 (354) W I (246) 891 41 f + (49) 151 (I) (240) 230--> o N _ (386) 338 i 1 7 2) 140-.A.. ^' o7,p N CN`i O N CO vv FIGURE 8 SUM OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES LONG BRANCH ESTATES PLATINUM PROPERTIES © A & F Engineering Co., LLC 2000 "ALL Rights Reserved" U 17 LEGEND 1 00 = A.M. PEAK HOUR 1 (00) = P.M. PEAK HOUR • * = NEGUGtBLE M a0 n a 1' cn Z 32 (21) NOT TO SCALE N o " x--12 (15) 4 3, 4 r 29 (14) (13) 5 1 h T e E-34 (29) ' a ° N ,1 (5) (14) 17— (42) 57-.4, (57) 43—► 11 r1 rM' r (20) 6 ^-r z m O O0 z O ziI— Fcc - Lu a co0 • 121st ST. IA 0 y 1 ry2 PROPOSED I w -53 EAGLE RIDGE I L _ . O o DEVELOPMENT A : m a � _ I SITE , I p t J �j, L _ _ J 116th ST. • ,,, ,,,. ---- , , 1 o W �, �., Z 26 (51) N N - " E—260 (263) N Ai, 7 (25) m 4) 3 4 r 149 (119) 4) 4 -0-329 (394) j (246) 89 1U) (260) 236—is- h 1, (411))371 '4 172) 140� ^ "' o, O N M O - CA N FIGURE 9 SUM OF EXISTING, FUTURE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES N s LONG BRANCH ESTATES PLATINUM PROPERTIES © A & F Engineering Co., LLC 2000 "ALL Rights Reserved" U 1 o 8 PLATINUM PROPERTIES-LONG BRANCH ESTATES TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS TABLE 3 - LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY-MICHIGAN ROAD AND 116TH STREET AM PEAK HOUR MOVEMENT SCENARIO I SCENARIO 2 SCENARIO 3 Northbound Approach B B B Southbound Approach D C C Eastbound Approach D C C Westbound Approach C C C Intersection D C C PM PEAK HOUR MOVEMENT SCENARIO 1 SCENARIO 2 SCENARIO 3 Northbound Approach F C C Southbound Approach C C C Eastbound Approach F D D Westbound Approach C D D Intersection F C D SCENARIO 1: Existing Traffic Volumes with Existing Conditions SCENARIO 2: Sum of Existing and Proposed Development Traffic Volumes with the Proposed Future Intersection Conditions Planned by INDOT* SCENARIO 3: Sum of Existing Traffic Volumes, Proposed Development Traffic Volumes and Future Surrounding Development Traffic Volumes with the Proposed Future Intersection Conditions Planned by INDOT* * The proposed future intersection geometrics are summarized on Figure 2. 19 PLATINUM PROPERTIES-LONG BRANCH ESTATES TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS TABLE 4 - LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMvIARY-MICHIGAN ROAD AND 121ST STREET AM PEAK HOUR MOVEMENT SCENARIO 1 SCENARIO 2 SCENARIO 3 Northbound Left-Turn B B B Southbound Left-Turn A A A Eastbound Approach F D D Westbound Approach F E E PM PEAK HOUR MOVEMENT SCENARIO 1 SCENARIO 2 SCENARIO 3 Northbound Approach A A A Southbound Approach B B B Eastbound Approach F D D Westbound Approach F F F SCENARIO 1: Existing Traffic Volumes with Existing Conditions SCENARIO 2: Sum of Existing and Proposed Development Traffic Volumes with the Proposed Future Intersection Conditions Planned by INDOT* SCENARIO 3: Sum of Existing Traffic Volumes, Proposed Development Traffic Volumes and Future Surrounding Development Traffic Volumes with the Proposed Future Intersection Conditions Planned by INDOT* * The proposed future intersection geometrics are summarized on Figure 2. 20 PLATINUM PROPERTIES-LONG BRANCH ESTATES TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS TABLE 5 - LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY-116TH STREET AND SOUTH ACCESS AM PEAK HOUR MOVEMENT SCENARIO 2 SCENARIO 3 Southbound Approach B B Eastbound Left-Turn A A PM PEAK HOUR MOVEMENT SCENARIO 2 SCENARIO 3 Southbound Approach B B Eastbound Left-Turn A A SCENARIO 2: Sum of Existing and Proposed Development Traffic Volumes with the Proposed Intersection Geometrics* SCENARIO 3: Sum of Existing Traffic Volumes, Proposed Development Traffic Volumes and Future Surrounding Development Traffic Volumes with the Proposed Future Intersection Geometrics* * The proposed future intersection geometrics include the construction of a left-turn lane and a right-turn taper along 116th Street and the development of the access drive to include two outbound lanes and one inbound lane. 21 PLATINUM PROPERTIES-LONG BRANCH ESTATES TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS TABLE 6 - LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY-121ST STREET AND NORTH ACCESS AM PEAK HOUR MOVEMENT SCENARIO 2 SCENARIO 3 Northbound Approach A A Westbound Approach A A PM PEAK HOUR MOVEMENT SCENARIO 2 SCENARIO 3 Northbound Approach A A Westbound Approach A A SCENARIO 2: Sum of Existing and Proposed Development Traffic Volumes with the Proposed Intersection Geometrics* SCENARIO 3: Sum of Existing Traffic Volumes, Proposed Development Traffic Volumes and Future Surrounding Development Traffic Volumes with the Proposed Future Intersection Geometrics* * The proposed future intersection geometrics include the construction of a right-turn taper along 120 Street and the development of the access drive to include two outbound lanes and one inbound lane. 22 PLATINUM PROPERTIES-LONG BRANCH ESTATES TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS CONCLUSIONS The conclusions that follow are based on existing traffic volume data, trip generation, assignment and distribution of generated traffic, capacity analyses with the resulting levels of service that have been prepared for each of the study intersections, and the field review conducted at the site. These conclusions apply only to the AM peak hour and PM peak hour that were addressed in this analysis. These peak hours are when the largest volumes of traffic will occur. Therefore, if the resulting level of service is adequate during these time periods, it can generally be assumed the remaining 22 hours will have levels of service that are better than the peak hour, since the existing street traffic volumes will be less during the other 22 hours. 1. MICHIGAN ROAD AND 116TH STREET Existing (Scenario 1) - A review of the level of service for each of the intersection approaches, with the existing traffic volumes and existing geometrics, has shown this intersection is operating below acceptable levels during the AM and PM peak hour. Proposed Development (Scenario 2) - When the traffic volumes from the proposed development are added to the existing traffic volumes, this intersection will operate at acceptable levels of service with the future intersection conditions proposed by 1NDOT. The future conditions are summarized on Figure 3. Proposed Development with Future Surrounding Development (Scenario 3) - When the traffic volumes from the proposed development are added to the existing traffic volumes and the future Eagle Ridge development traffic volumes, this intersection will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service with the future intersection conditions proposed by INDOT. The future conditions are summarized on Figure 3. 2. MICHIGAN ROAD AND 121ST STREET Existing (Scenario 1) - A review of the level of service for each of the intersection approaches, with the existing traffic volumes and existing geometrics, has shown that the northbound and southbound approaches are operating at acceptable levels. However, the 23 PLATINUM PROPERTIES-LONG BRANCH ESTATES TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS eastbound and westbound approaches are operating below unacceptable levels. These unacceptable levels are due to the lack of gaps in the traffic stream traveling Michigan Road. Proposed Development (Scenario 2) - When the traffic volumes from the proposed development are added to the existing traffic volumes, the northbound and southbound approaches will operate at acceptable levels and the eastbound and westbound approaches will operate below unacceptable levels with the future intersection geometrics proposed by INDOT. These unacceptable levels are due to the lack of gaps in the traffic stream traveling Michigan Road. The proposed INDOT intersection geometrics are illustrated on Figure 3. Proposed Development with Future Surrounding Development (Scenario 3) - When the traffic volumes from the proposed development are added to the existing traffic volumes and the future Eagle Ridge development traffic volumes, the northbound and southbound approaches will operate at acceptable levels and the eastbound and westbound approaches will operate below unacceptable levels. These unacceptable levels are due to the lack of gaps in the traffic stream traveling Michigan Road. The proposed 1NDOT intersection geometrics are illustrated on Figure 3. 3. 116TH STREET AND SOUTH ACCESS Proposed Development (Scenario 2) - When the traffic volumes from the proposed development are added to the existing traffic volumes, all approaches of this intersection will operate at acceptable levels of service with the proposed intersection geometrics. These proposed geometrics include the construction of a left-turn treatment and a right-turn taper along 1 16th Street and the development of the access drive to include two outbound lanes and one inbound lane. Proposed Development with Future Surrounding Development (Scenario 3) - When the traffic volumes from the proposed development are added to the existing traffic volumes and the future Eagle Ridge development traffic volumes, all approaches of this intersection will 24 PLATINUM PROPERTIES-LONG BRANCH ESTATES TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS operate at acceptable levels of service with the proposed intersection geometrics. These proposed geometrics include the construction of a left-turn treatment and a right-turn taper along 116t Street and the development of the access drive to include two outbound lanes and one inbound lane. 4. 126Th STREET AND NORTH ACCESS Proposed Development (Scenario 2) - When the traffic volumes from the proposed development are added to the existing traffic volumes, all approaches of this intersection will operate at acceptable levels of service with the proposed intersection geometrics. These proposed geometrics include the construction of a right-turn taper along 121 ` Street and the development of the access drive to include two outbound lanes and one inbound lane. Proposed Development with Future Surrounding Development (Scenario 3) - When the traffic volumes from the proposed development are added to the existing traffic volumes and the future Eagle Ridge development traffic volumes, all approaches of this intersection will operate at acceptable levels of service with the proposed intersection geometrics. These proposed geometrics include the construction of a right-turn taper along 121 ` and the development of the access drive to include two outbound lanes and one inbound lane. 25 PLATINUM PROPERTIES-LONG BRANCH ESTATES TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS RECOMMENDATIONS Based on this analysis and the conclusions, the following recommendations are made to insure that the roadway system will operate at acceptable levels of service if the site is developed as proposed. 1. MICHIGAN ROAD AND 116TH STREET • This intersection is currently operating below acceptable levels of service. Therefore, the proposed future INDOT improvements should be implemented with or without the proposed development. 2. MICHIGAN ROAD AND 121ST STREET • The proposed future INDOT improvements should be implemented with or without the proposed development. 3. PROPOSED SOUTH ACCESS POINT • This access point should be developed with two twelve-foot wide outbound lanes and one sixteen-foot wide inbound lane. Furthermore, a left-turn treatment and a right-turn taper should be constructed along 116th Street. 4. PROPOSED NORTH ACCESS POINT • This access point should be developed with two twelve-foot wide outbound lanes and one sixteen-foot wide inbound lane. Furthermore, a right-turn taper should be constructed along 120 Street. 26 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS APPENDIX A LONG BRANCH ESTATES HAMILTON COUNTY PREPARED FOR PLATINUM PROPERTIES AUGUST 2000 A&F ENGINEERING CO., LLC Fit CONSULTING ENGINEERS 8425 KEYSTONE CROSSING, SUITE 200 INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46240 PLATINUM PROPERTIES-LONG BRANCH ESTATES TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS APPENDIX A This document contains the traffic data that were used in the TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS for the proposed multi-family development. Included are the intersection turning movement traffic volume counts and the intersection capacity analyses for each of the study intersections for the AM peak hour and PM peak hour. PLATINUM PROPERTIES-LONG BRANCH ESTATES TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS MICHIGAN ROAD AND 116TH STREET 1 MICHIGAN ROAD AND 121ST STREET 9 116TH STREET AND SOUTH ACCESS 17 121S1 STREET AND NORTH ACCESS 22 • 6 PLATINUM PROPERTIES-LONG BRANCH ESTATES TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS MICHIGAN ROAD AND 116TH STREET INTERSECTION DATA TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNTS AND CAPACITY ANALYSES 1 H Hpo n('� MOM MOO 0 O O O 20H *=ii NW H UA ooIII ;rn O o H •hd z z Z OU1A 1000 -4 H o+ ui a> o r 11 H WW W Or 0 WA HH W • OW • in 1.4 • W O0W UTAW Z W HNN H iA PC tOt0O OOAUI JW ANO AOON Ui int.) -44 H ONA Jt000 *OO JNA (00000 7. b MH N CO A in ?D v oo '�'ro w o in o in •• `H o OH W A H H 0 H • CN/4 • ON • N OIU1U1 J0J UJ wOAA 4AMH CO 03 to to in 03 r rn a►CO f-• 0 in o bi rn w m o00 H H R+ 000001 1 AWO 1 ON HON -41.10 0Q 'may �0 r WW H ro ro rnoj HHH HHH R7 d • ►M OW H N :J al JO► A (c^:,.14 + O 0 Pg, < Z JO OOH 1 OAN i (A Ul H •q O M *0 OONUIroQIH00 CTl '� RI 0 �•d C7 H HR H PM 0 0 N I I 7V � OI En fid O 01 M En • AH2 •OC\ OIUTA WAN N 0 0• 4J (A OOUlA (/1 0 0 H4:•. 00 JUIN Ui N • "0001 HtOH .df,4 OI CA LA HO1to) 1 1 ►< H H cji NJ NJ cn 0o rho H Z O O N H • • W • W • O wNN NwHa1 ni (001(0 t0A10 Wt0 A (OUI U31-+ N 6 " 4„. w0 Hoz o HAJ 0J01 df CD NJJ 4=. 014 0100 -4 H N x kJ A W J U1 W A R W N J JNN La • N) 10 CO ) OI J 44 + M M O ut WW U1A A N --.4.0. dPJ WWN UINJ 6 A Oo00 " ,'3, H OH H 0N N N N H N H 0 • Oo 0I A H t0 w w H 000 OI4U1 w1-+ J *-4 01U1J HWUI Hub: Signalized Intersections Releabe 3.2 Inter: Michigan Rd. & 116th Street City/St: Analyst: RMB Proj #: S1-Exisintg Date: 8/22/2000 Period: AM Peak E/W St: 116th Street N/S St: Michigan Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 LGConfig LT R LTR L TR L T R Volume 89 227 140 61 235 20 109 324 55 56 712 285 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 I RTOR Vol 70 0 13 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A A Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 41.0 7. 0 52.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 1.0 0.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 111.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 386 1045 0.91 0.369 58.2 E 51.8 D R 563 1524 0.14 0.369 23.4 C Westbound LTR 501 1357 0.70 0.369 34.1 C 34.1 C Northbound L 168 0.72 0.559 37.0 D TR 948 1697 0.43 0.559 14.5 B 19.7 B Southbound L 421 898 0.15 0.468 17.0 B T 809 1727 0.98 0.468 55.1 E 43.7 D R 688 1468 0.46 0.468 20.5 C Intersection Delay = 38.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 A&F Engineering Phone: Fax: E-Mail: 3 Hcs: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: Michigan Rd. & 116th Street City/St: Analyst: RMB Proj #: S1-Exisintg Date: 8/22/2000 Period: PM Peak E/W St: 116th Street N/S St: Michigan Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 LGConfig LT R LTR L TR L T R Volume 246 230 172 61 246 47 220 817 55 101 450 137 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 86 0 13 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 34 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A A Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 52.0 7.0 49.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 1.0 0.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 119.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 360 823 1.47 0.437 259.4 F 222.7 F R 666 1524 0.14 0.437 20.2 C Westbound LTR 589 1347 0.67 0.437 29.5 C 29.5 C Northbound L 272 0.90 0.496 63.0 E TR 850 1715 1.12 0.496 100.7 F 93.0 F Southbound L 61 141 1.84 0.412 467.6 F T 711 1727 0.70 0.412 32.1 C 94.2 F R 604 1468 0.25 0.412 23.2 C Intersection Delay = 112.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 ASF Engineering Phone: Fax: E-Mail: 4. n..a: Signalized Intersections Rel 3 3.2 Inter: Michigan Rd. & 116th Street City/St: Analyst: RMB Proj #: S2-Ex+Prop Traffic w/ Prop Int Date: 8/22/2000 Period: AM Peak E/W St: 116th Street N/S St: Michigan Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 LGConfig L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume 89 230 140 93 244 22 109 326 66 57 716 285 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 70 11 33 142 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right A SB Right WB Right A Green 7.0 12.0 7.0 18.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 60.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 199 1703 0.50 0.117 26.8 C T 358 1792 0.72 0.200 29.1 C 25.5 C R 584 1524 0.13 0.383 12.1 B Westbound L 385 3303 0.27 0.117 24.5 C T 358 1792 0.76 0.200 31.6 C 29.1 C R 584 1524 0.02 0.383 11.5 B Northbound L 371 3183 0.33 0.117 24.8 C T 985 3282 0.37 0.300 16.8 B 18.5 B R 440 1468 0.08 0.300 15.2 B Southbound L 191 1641 0.33 0.117 25.4 C T 985 3282 0.81 0.300 24.5 C 23.4 C R 440 1468 0.36 0.300 17.0 B Intersection Delay = 23.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 ASF Engineering Phone: Fax: E-Mail: 5 Signalized Intersections Rel ...e 3.2 Inter: Michigan Rd. & 116th Street City/St: Analyst: RMB Proj #: S2-Ex+Prop Traffic w/ Prop Int Date: 8/22/2000 Period: PM Peak E/W St: 116th Street N/S St: Michigan Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 LGConfig L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume 246 240 172 82 252 48 220 822 91 104 453 137 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 86 24 45 68 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A - NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right A SB Right WB Right A Green 13.0 13.0 7.0 23.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 72.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 307 1703 0.89 0.181 54.5 D T 324 1792 0.82 0.181 44.1 D 44.5 D R 508 1524 0.19 0.333 17.3 B Westbound L 596 3303 0.15 0.181 25.0 C T 324 1792 0.86 0.181 49.4 D 41.6 D R 508 1524 0.05 0.333 16.3 B Northbound L 309 3183 0.79 0.097 44.7 D T 1048 3282 0.87 0.319 31.2 C 33.4 C R 469 1468 0.11 0.319 17.4 B Southbound L 160 1641 0.73 0.097 46.7 D T 1048 3282 0.48 0.319 20.0+ C 24.2 C R 469 1468 0.16 0.319 17.8 B Intersection Delay = 34.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 A&F Engineering Phone: Fax: E-Mail: 6 - HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: Michigan Rd. & 116th Street City/St: Analyst: RMB Proj #: S3-Total Traffic w/ Prop Int Date: 8/22/2000 Period: AM Peak E/W St: 116th Street N/S St: Michigan Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 LGConfig L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume 89 236 140 149 260 26 109 328 85 59 722 285 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 70 13 42 142 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A - NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right A SB Right WB Right A Green 7.0 14.0 7.0 21.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 65.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 183 1703 0.54 0.108 30.7 C T 386 1792 0.68 0.215 28.2 C 26.1 C R 586 1524 0.13 0.385 13.1 B Westbound L 356 3303 0.47 0.108 28.2 C T 386 1792 0.75 0.215 31.8 C 29.9 C R 586 1524 0.02 0.385 12.4 B Northbound L 343 3183 0.35 0.108 27.5 C T 1060 3282 0.34 0.323 16.9 B 19.2 B R 474 1468 0.10 0.323 15.5 B Southbound L 177 1641 0.37 0.108 28.3 C T 1060 3282 0.76 0.323 22.9 C 22.3 C R 474 1468 0.34 0.323 17.1 B Intersection Delay = 23.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 ASF Engineering Phone: Fax: E-Mail: 7 , xcS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: Michigan Rd. & 116th Street City/St: Analyst: RMB Proj 4: S3-Total Traffic w/ Prop Int Date: 8/22/2000 Period: PM Peak E/W St: 116th Street N/S St: Michigan Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 LGConfig L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume 246 260 172 119 263 51 220 830 159 109 457 137 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 86 25 79 68 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right A SB Right WB Right A Green 13.0 15.0 7.0 25.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 76.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 291 1703 0.94 0.171 67.7 E T 354 1792 0.82 0.197 43.0 D 49.6 D R 521 1524 0.18 0.342 17.7 B Westbound L 565 3303 0.23 0.171 27.4 C T 354 1792 0.82 0.197 43.9 D 37.4 D R 521 1524 0.06 0.342 16.8 B Northbound L 293 3183 0.83 0.092. 52.1 D T 1080 3282 0.85 0.329 30.6 C 33.9 C R 483 1468 0.18 0.329 18.4 B Southbound L 151 1641 0.80 0.092 59.6 E T 1080 3282 0.47 0.329 20.6 C 27.0 C R 483 1468 0.16 0.329 18.2 B Intersection Delay = 36.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 A&F Engineering Phone: Fax: E-Mail: 8 ' PLATINUM PROPERTIES-LONG BRANCH ESTATES TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS MICHIGAN ROAD AND 121sT STREET INTERSECTION DATA TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNTS AND CAPACITY ANALYSES 9 mgg wq PEP rooU~i h�djV4I H 41 �yH �� 1 Pi M@1 III III 0 R00o z 01UTA woo -4 2 z W WWN OW A O H 0 01 W 1' x ON • Ar • J OWJ AAN W w • ODOrlN H H CoOW10 00WN 1-+ 01 WOOW NJ -4 VD W O VD VD W cif.P. W W W J 0 CO x W N to r W J � . h7 A wwJo+ 0 {� •UlH • ON , • 03 AA UI -4 0 01 (A WOr JN r1rO� O oPAH 00NUI VD1-' J JVD VO-4N N1-' 00 Di WHJH r� •CHH R'+ J01N 1 WJ.4 1 4P.4 WWI-' I-+ Jto ro 0P. hjX V hi ro u.) -4 H H H HH 00 ;U W to o H o co 0. UtwN 1'A1D + ►0y 0 rbroro 4 tz=7i 4,003 01 N A ( OO J 1-' 1 to N o 00 r H .d 2 ,dror 0 OHH MN t$ t'l I �V 3zd 1' to N 4� O 2 O .4,- y+ (!) f) 0101N(A COJNCil .P UI UIUTA O1JU1 U q H O 4)01A 0"DW 0J 010101 .0000 0) I 1 K I-I HM x J J w w r 17 0 O N 1 • . • r D 00N JWH WA N N N N W N H v rN NOM .P J 03 U1 01 N *01 N in W W N 1' is U1 N 01 H w -- 0 H s• W ;U A H N ANM •• W Ol r O • Ul H + ;' 0 NOJ0301 03HJ W O,i O' J x *w wow w -10 .0 H 0 H O01nP~ l~.J 1*30)0 • H H 001 O.PI-' NWA 0N ANW UIJ0 �1 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: Michigan Rd. & 121st Street Analyst: Project No. : ;9,31Pt4 - Date: S1-Exisitng East/West Street: North/South Street: Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 42 352 16 6 988 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 46 391 17 6 1097 Percent Heavy Vehicles 10 -- -- 10 -- -- Median Type Undivided - RT Channelized? No Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 Configuration LT R LTR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R Volume 19 10 3 5 16 57 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 21 11 3 5 17 63 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 5 5 5 5 5 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LTR I LTR I LTR v (vph) 46 6 _ 35 85 C(m) (vph) 594 1109 60 165 v/c 0.08 0.01 0.58 0.52 95% queue length 0.16 0.00 1.80 2.30 Control Delay 11.6 8.3 127.9 48.0 LOS B A F E Approach Delay 127.9 48.0 Approach LOS F E HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 11 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: Michigan Rd. & 121st Street Analyst: RMB Project No. : pun PgAjl. Date: S1-Exisitng East/West Street: North/South Street: Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 65 926 36 7 475 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 72 1Q28 40 7 527 Percent Heavy Vehicles 10 -- -- 10 -- -- •Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 Configuration LT R LTR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 7 14 2 13 11 42 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 15 2 14 12 46 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 5 5 5 5 5 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LTR 1 LTR I LTR v (vph) 72 7 24 72 C(m) (vph) 988 623 63 128 v/c 0.07 0.01 0.38 0.56 95% queue length 0.14 0.00 1.10 2.39 Control Delay 8.9 10.8 93.7 64.3 LOS A B F F Approach Delay 93.7 64.3 Approach LOS F F HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 12 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: Michigan Rd. & 121st Street Analyst: RMB Project No. : /y'/1? FEAk:-- Date: S2-Ex+Prop Traffic w/ Prop Int East/West Street: North/South Street: Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 42 354 18 10 989 23 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 46 393 20 11 1098 25 Percent Heavy Vehicles 10 -- -- 10 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 23 11 15 5 16 57 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 25 12 16 5 17 63 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 5 5 5 5 5 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I L TR I L TR v (vph) 46 11 25 28 5 80 C(m) (vph) 574 1087 117 177 76 243 v/c 0.08 0.01 0.21 0.16 0.07 0.33 95% queue length 0.17 0.00 0.68 0.50 0.06 1.38 Control Delay 11.8 8.3 43.9 29. 1 55.7 26. 9 LOS B A E D F D Approach Delay 36.1 28. 6 Approach LOS E D HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 13 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: Michigan Rd. & 121st Street Analyst: RMB Project No. : PM PCM/'- Date: S2-Ex+Prop Traffic w/ Prop Int East/West Street: North/South Street: Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R 1 L T R Volume 65 927 41 21 478 14 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 72 1030 45 23 531 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 10 -- -- 10 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 10 14 10 13 12 42 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 15 11 14 13 46 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 5 5 5 5 5 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L 1 L TR 1 L TR v (vph) 72 23 11 26 14 59 C(m) (vph) 966 599 59 108 94 231 v/c 0.07 0.04 0.19 0.24 0.15 0.26 95% queue length 0.15 0.00 0.45 0.77 0.39 0. 99 Control Delay 9.0 11.2 79.5 48.6 49.9 25.8 LOS A B F E E D Approach Delay 57.8 30.5 Approach LOS F D HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 14 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: Michigan Rd. & 121st Street Analyst: RMB Project No. : ///'^, is A/e Date: S3-Total Traffic w/ Prop Int East/West Street: North/South Street: Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 42 358 20 16 991 23 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 46 397 22 17 1101 25 Percent Heavy Vehicles 10 -- -- 10 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 29 13 32 5 17 57 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 32 14 35 5 18 63 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 5 5 5 5 5 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L 1 L TR 1 L TR v (vph) 46 17 32 49 5 81 C(m) (vph) 572 1082 111 234 70 233 v/c 0.08 0.02 0.29 0.21 0.07 0.35 95% queue length 0. 17 0.00 0.97 0.77 0.08 1.47 Control Delay 11.8 8.4 50.1 24.4 60.3 28.5 LOS B A F C F D Approach Delay 34.5 30.3 Approach LOS D D HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 15 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: Michigan Rd. & 121st Street Analyst: RMB Project No. : TM P 1r- Date: S3-Total Traffic w/ Prop Int East/West Street: North/South Street: Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R 1 L T R Volume 65 930 49 23 483 14 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 72 1033 54 25 536 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 10 -- -- 10 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 14 15 21 13 14 42 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 16 23 14 15 46 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 5 5 5 5 5 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I L TR I L TR v (vph) 72 25 15 39 14 61 C(m) (vph) 962 593 55 136 88 209 v/c 0.07 0.04 0.27 0.29 0. 16 0.29 95% queue length 0.15 0.00 0.70 1.02 0.42 1.15 Control Delay 9.0 11.3 93.4 41.8 53.5 29.2 LOS A B F E F D Approach Delay 56.1 33.7 Approach LOS F D HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 16 PLATINUM PROPERTIES-LONG BRANCH ESTATES TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS 116TH STREET AND SOUTH ACCESS INTERSECTION DATA CAPACITY ANALYSES 17 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: 116th Street and South Access Analyst: RMB Project No. : AM PC/1k:- Date: CADate: S2-Ex+Prop Traffic East/West Street: North/South Street: Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 15 338 316 7 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 16 375 351 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 22 43 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 24 47 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 5 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I L R v (vph) 16 24 47 C(m) (vph) 1184 365 683 v/c 0.01 0.07 0.07 95% queue length 0.00 0. 09 0. 11 Control Delay 8.1 15.6 10.7 LOS A C B Approach Delay 12.3 Approach LOS B HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 18 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: 116th Street and South Access Analyst: RMB Project No. : FM PC,AK- Date: S2-Ex+Prop Traffic East/West Street: North/South Street: Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 49 386 354 25 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 54 428 393 27 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 14 28 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 31 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 5 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I 1 L R v (vph) 54 15 31 C(m) (vph) 1123 277 638 v/c 0.05 0. 05 0.05 95% queue length 0.00 0.02 0.00 Control Delay 8.4 18.7 10.9 LOS A C B Approach Delay 13.5 Approach LOS B HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 19 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: 116th Street and South Access Analyst: RMB Project No. : /11M PCA2- Date: S3-Ex+Future+Prop Traffic East/West Street: North/South Street: Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 15 371 329 7 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 16 412 365 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 22 43 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 24 47 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 5 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I L R v (vph) 16 24 47 C(m) (vph) 1170 340 671 v/c 0.01 0.07 0. 07 95% queue length 0.00 0. 11 0. 12 Control Delay 8.1 16. 4 10. 8 LOS A C B Approach Delay 12.7 Approach LOS B HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 20 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: 116th Street and South Access Analyst: RMB Project No. : pm PCA/'- Date: S3-Ex+Future+Prop Traffic East/West Street: North/South Street: Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 49 411 394 25 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 54 456 437 27 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 14 28 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 31 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 5 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I L R v (vph) 54 15 31 C(m) (vph) 1082 251 603 v/c 0.05 0.06 0.05 95% queue length 0.00 0. 05 0.01 Control Delay 8.5 20.3 11.3 LOS A C B Approach Delay 14.2 Approach LOS B HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 21 PLATINUM PROPERTIES-LONG BRANCH ESTATES TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS 121sT STREET AND NORTH ACCESS INTERSECTION DATA CAPACITY ANALYSES 22 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: 121st Street and North Access Analyst: RMB Project No. : ;i44 PFAK Date: S2-Ex+Prop Traffic East/West Street: North/South Street: Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 38 6 1 32 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 42 6 1 35 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 5 -- -- Median Type Undivided'-- :A. RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? No No • Minor Street:- Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 17 4 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 18 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 5 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v (vph) 1 18 4 C(m) (vph) 1540 913 1016 v/c 0.00 0.02 0.00 95% queue length 0.00 0.00 0.00 Control Delay 7.3 9.0 8.6 LOS A A A Approach Delay 8.9 Approach LOS A HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 23 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: 121st Street and North Access Analyst: RMB Project No. : PM ??FAIL Date: S2-Ex+Prop Traffic East/West Street: North/South Street: Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 54 20 5 23 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 6Q. 22 5 25 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 5 -- -- Median Type Undivided--- RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 11 3 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 12 3 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 5 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v (vph) 5 12 3 C(m) (vph) 1497 882 983 v/c 0.00 0.01 0.00 95i queue length 0.00 0.00 0.00 Control Delay 7.4 9.1 8.7 LOS A A A Approach Delay 9.0 Approach LOS A HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 24 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: 121st Street and North Access Analyst: RMB Project No. : AM PEAL, Date: S3-Ex+Future+prop Traffic East/West Street: North/South Street: Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs)-: 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 43 6 1 34 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 47 6 1 37 Percent Heavy Vehicles . . - -- 5 -- -- Median Type Undivided= - RT Channelized? .. Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R - , Volume 17 4 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 18 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 5 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v (vph) 1 18 4 C(m) (vph) 1534 904 1010 v/c 0.00 0.02 0.00 95% queue length 0.00 0.00 0.00 Control Delay 7.3 9.1 8.6 LOS A A A Approach Delay 9.0 Approach LOS A HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 25 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: 121st Street and North Access Analyst: RMB Project No. : 9,4 PeAP Date: S3-Ex+Future+Prop Traffic East/West Street: North/South Street: Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R 1 L T R Volume 57 20 a 23 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 63 22 5 32 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- 5 -- -- Median Type Undivided-z-, _- RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 - 11 12 L T R 1 L T R -- Volume 11 3 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 12 3 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 5 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v (vph) 5 12 3 C(m) (vph) 1493 871 979 v/c 0.00 0.01 0.00 95% queue length 0.00 0.00 0.00 Control Delay 7.4 9.2 8.7 LOS A A A Approach Delay 9.1 Approach LOS A HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 26 ,� c ) /� i ) V — - 7 1 G � i jr- d , " " )' \, _'S , , f �� .� 0 C� F — ) �r — ,.A 1_ • R C.r. , 1 7 a 1, , 1 , �� - i�. ` y _ � , /" ` - G �� C, p. 1.. )), ) -/7 A 'J -r /. ti � R , - t f f -�� , � ;2 1 7 `- l �� } 7 - f 1. - / . / l I. �, _ / - � l L • J 7f. I) -1 ` ( - �' 77- j r /r I� 1 1 / v/0 l6 1 - I1 1, ` �� , / , • - l v �� )_ N e �, ) C - ,�; r ,,Y__ , 5, ( .p . ��� ' , �2 1 ,iv ) H v I �`1 l r )- ' , , ',( ' r ^ ' \ ,' ' r_. ,_ ,,, _ .")." N ,f_cc:',,,r6fe!--,1,-,,_ _,, ,T J C b C ` ,= �� 711 ( s i ,- a } l� �' .�' V l t \ I » _ / ? ) 31 3 / T ' 1 r' v i/5 •5 ' \ P"' �5 f'' 1 1 , )_ - �:l • _ / ( AC k A, , 1 J , _ - - - Z 2 1 �� • i J / C ,„I 1 r i _ _ �j _ - r -5,\ , _,_ :\_),...,_1.,, A- c.- Cl_ Cr / S , - • . . l __ (7 r r", • ("> - r J - i l r - 5-4 - _ _( l (/ 1 r • -, .N 1. Y • \ r '� a _ �‘ r - 1 tr 7 - . Y -I' { ,'- ) •