HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes HO 05-28-19 Approved 1-0,with Conditions: The tenant may utilize secondary signage on the South building elevation as described
• in the Village of WestClay PUD Ordinance section 18.3.B,E, F,G,and H through the standard sign permit application
process, and screening of the roof top mounted mechanical units must be done by June 30,2019.
(V)Giannini Pool.
The applicant seeks the following development standards variance approvals:
2. Docket No. 19040012 V UDO Section 5.02.C.7 Min.swimming pool setbacks of easement width plus 3'
at rear and min. 10'side required; 15' rear and 7'7"side requested.
3. Docket No. 19040013 V UDO Section 2.04 Max.35% (50%) lot cover allowed; 54% requested.
The site is located at 5961 Heaton Pass, in Chapman's Claim at Prairie View Subdivision, Section 2A,Lot 87. It
is zoned S 1-Residence/ROSO I. Filed by Marge Mikels of Pools of Fun,on behalf of Gery&April Giannini,
owners.
Petitioner: Dotty Canfield,Pools of Fun:
• We are requesting to build a 14'x24' pool
• The concrete at the back of the pool will be encroaching on the rear easement by 1'
• The pool's length will match up to the side of the home,which is encroaching 7'7"into the sideyard
• The Giannini's are removing their existing deck,and building more decking. They are keeping the existing
landscaping and trees. There's a real tight space where the pool can be placed.
Public Comments:
Kyle LoCascio,5959 Heaton Pass: We live right next door. I'm fine with their variance requests.
Department Report: Angie Conn:
• This subdivision is zoned ROSO I. It was platted under Residential Open Space Ordinance where the lots were
platted to be smaller so the overall neighborhood can have some platted open space.
• Their lot coverage has a grandfathered status of 50%and they are seeking 4%more=54%total
• The Engineering&Planning Depts.are fine with these variance approvals as long as they get their Consent to
Encroach approval from the Board of Public Works. Staff would like this as a condition of their approval.
Board Comments: Alan Potasnik:
• Are you on the agenda with the Board of Public Works? Dotty Canfield: We are not.
• Are you aware of the requirement of the Consent to Encroach(to the easement)? Dotty Canfield. We are not.
• This approval will be subject to you getting approval at the Board of Public Works. Get together with the
Department and see what exactly it is you need to file. Angie Conn: I can send the Petitioner the form.
Approved 1-0,with the Condition of the Petitioner seeking to Consent to Encroach approval from the BPW.
(V)Keller Pool.
The applicant seeks the following development standards variance approvals:
4. Docket No. 19040014 V UDO Section 2.10 Max.35% lot cover allowed,49% requested.
5. Docket No. 19040015 V UDO Section 5.02.C.7 10' min.side pool/equipment setback required,8'
requested.The site is located at 906 Auman Dr. W.,on Lot 14 of Auman's Addition. It is zoned R2/Residence.
Filed by Daniel Majestic of Perma Pools,on behalf of Michael and Kimberly Keller,owners.
Petitioner: Daniel Majestic,Perma Pools:
• We want to utilized more of the Keller's yard to accommodate an in-ground pool and pool deck
• The overall drainage will be improved
• We can direct the service runoff water to the back/southern portion of the property
• The pool equipment is the quietest in the industry
2
BZA Hearing Officer Minutes 5-28-19
• We will never have to drain the pool unless we replace the linear which occurs every 7-12 years
• If we have to drain the pool,we can direct the water to the sewer drainage in the front of the house
• The site plan in our info packet has the location of the pool equipment
• Our landscaper will do a great job. They have a good relationship with the City of Carmel
• I am working Alex Jordan of the Engineering Dept. We can install a French drain to absorb some of the runoff
water created by the impervious surfaces.
Public Comments: None
Department Report: Angie Conn:
• We asked the petitioner for the specs on the pool pump. It's more costly but it's the quietest pump in the industry.
• They are working with the Engineering Dept.to address all the drainage and grading concerns
• Does the Petitioner plan to put up any privacy fence? Mike Keller: Not initially,but maybe in the future.
• We recommend approval with the condition of them meeting all the concerns of the Engineering Dept.
Board Comments: Alan Potasnik:
• As long as the Engineering Dept.knows the plan and they approve it. Are you aware of these concerns?
Daniel Majestic: Yes
Approved 1-0,with the Condition of satisfying all the Carmel Engineering Dept.comments and concerns.
(V) 1631 W.Main St.Fence.
The applicant seeks the following variance approval for a front yard fence with gated driveway:
6. Docket No. 19040017 V UDO Section 5.09 6-ft tall fence in the front yard requested,Max.42-inch
allowed.The site is located at 1631 W.Main St. It is zoned S1/Residence. Filed by Andrew&Laurie Schneider,
owners
Petitioners: Andrew& Laurie Schneider:
• We live on 2.7 acres south of Main Street. The ordinance states anything under 3 acres,the height maximum for
a fence is 42".
• With the size of our property,we think the 6' fence would look better
• We will stay out of the ROWs. There's a 45' street ROW and 10' utility easement. The fence will be 55' back
from the road.
• We have two little kids and with Main Street being busy,we wanted to put up a fence for safety
• It will be a black ornamental fencing with stone column work. It will be a high quality project.
Public Comments: None
Department Report: Angie Conn:
• If this parcel was 0.3 acres larger,they would be exempt from this requirement of a variance
• The homeowners are working with the Carmel Fire&Police Dept. for emergency gate access
• We recommend approval of this variance request
Board Comments: Alan Potasnik: None
Approved 1-0
(V)761 1st Ave NW-Bain Residence.
The applicant seeks the following development standards variance approvals:
7. Docket No. 19040010 V UDO Section 3.64.C.11 Dwelling height greater than 7' taller than
nearest Character Building-23' allowed,28.2' requested.
3
BZA Hearing Officer Minutes 5-28-19