Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes HO 06-24-19 (V)KAR Headquarters Ground Sign. The applicant seeks the following development standards variance approvals: 3. Docket No. 19050009 V UDO Sections 5.39.D.3&5.39.H.5.b.i Minimum 5' setback from street right of way allowed; 24.54' into ROW requested. 4. Docket No. 19050010 V UDO Section 5.39.H.3.b Maximum 6' tall sign allowed, 11'2"sign requested. The site is located at 11299 N. Illinois St. It is zoned MC/Meridian Corridor.Filed by Doug Staley Jr. of Staley Signs Inc. Petitioner: Doug Staley Jr.: • The ground sign we are proposing is a unique situation • There's an existing concrete retaining wall. The KAR owner wants to use the existing wall as a monument sign. • The retaining wall is 6' in height,projects in the ROW,and is part of a detention pond • The south elevation of the retaining wall is the retention area,and this is where the sign is 11' tall because the grade dips in this area. • This retaining wall has a Consent to Encroach from the Engineering Department • The sign will contain individual letters,fabricated,and 1.5"deep • The lighting on the sign will not shine outward and it will just illuminate the wall • The landscaping plan has been reviewed by the Urban Forester Public Comments: None Department Report: Angie Conn • This is a straight-forward variance request • They are repurposing the existing concrete wall structure and landscaping will be ample at the base • We recommend positive consideration of the variance requests Board Comments: Alan Potasnik • What's the height of the overall wall? Doug Staley: presented an elevation of the ground sign,the curve line on the elevation shows where the grade is. From the normal grade,the tallest part of the wall is 5'2"and shortest part is 3'6". • Do the square footage of the letters on the sign exceed what is allowed? Doug Staley: They meet square footage allowance. Approved 1-0 (V)Juniper on Main Sign. The applicant seeks the following development standards variance approval: 5. Docket No. 19050024 V UDO Section 5.39.H.5.d Projecting sign on building only allowed; sign on accessory structure requested. The site is located at 110 E.Main St. It is zoned B2Business and Old Town Overlay,Character Subarea. Filed by Jim Streeter of Innovative Planning,LLC,on behalf of Ken Kellner and K& E Properties. Petitioner: Jim Streeter: • We are allowed two signs because this building has two street frontages • The sign on 1'Ave has been approved and has been installed • The sign on Main Street is the one being involved with this variance • The restaurant sits 25' back from the street • We need a place to put the sign,and the beams on pergola is a good location • The sign will be 8' off the ground Public Comments: None Department Report: Angie Conn • This site has two street frontages so they are allowed two signs 2 BZA Hearing Officer Minutes • Their proposed sign on Main Street is a smaller sign, 12"x 16"and it's up 8' so it can be visible. • Its attached to the pergola and not to the main building • We recommend approval of this variance IBoard Comments: Alan Potasnik: • Where else can you put the sign? Angie: We thought maybe in the parking lot by the rain garden,but that was too far back for visibility from the street. Approved 1-0 (V)Fung Residence,Side Yard Setback. The applicant seeks the following development standards variance approval: 6. Docket No. 19050025 V PUD Z-553-11 Exhibit L,Section 5 Min. 10' side yard building setback required;4.8' requested. The site is located at 1236 Skytag Dr, in Jackson's Grant on Williams Creek Subdivision, Section 1A,Lot 94.It is zoned Silvara PUD/Planned Unit Development.Filed by Brett Huff of Stoeppelwerth&Assoc.on behalf of Homes by John McKenzie,builder. Petitioner: Brett Huff: • There were incorrect dimensions logged on the recorded plat • There was a 3`d party engineer that placed the stakes on Lot 94 • The home was placed 4.82' away from the lot line,when they thought it was 10' • We have an agreement with the adjacent homeowner of the lot to the north that's not built yet. We asked them to construct a side-loading garage. • The will be well over the 20' separation from the adjacent homes Public Comments: None I Department Report: Angie Conn • We are in favor of this variance request due to the fact they received confirmation from the adjacent neighbor • There will be a 42' setback between the two houses Board Comments: Alan Potasnik: • How did you discover this error? Brett Huff: Stoeppelwerth curb painting lot lines were different than the 3`d party surveyor curb painting lot lines. The lines on the plat were correct. • The house to the north made an adjustment to you? Brett Huff: That's correct • What about the house to the north of the north neighboring house? Will there be an effect to any other lots? Brett Huff: presented a site map, that house is on a corner lot,and will have no effect. Approved 1-0 (V) 5501 E.Main St.Guest House. The applicant seeks the following development standards variance approval to move an existing historic house from 241 1st Ave SE to this site: 7. Docket No. 19050031 V UDO Section 5.02 Guest house on>_lacre allowed; 0.80 acre requested.(With existing building height&footprint.) The site is located at 5501 E.Main St. It is zoned S1/Residence.Filed by Sam Burgess of the Cannel Historic Preservation Commission,on behalf of Joseph&Kristi Bishop,owners. IPetitioner: Sam Burgess: • The Historic Preservation Commission was alerted that a historic home in Old Town was going to be demoed • We got them to agree to allow for another party to take this home to another location in Cannel • We had 3 interested parties,and Joe and Kristi Bishop had a reasonable proposal to move this house • This is one of the few remaining 19th century homes in Cannel 3 BZA Hearing Officer Minutes