HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes COM 10-01-19 / �,NYFxf •
/31 of It
aka y of C
an:
rya
Carmel Plan Commission
COMMERCIAL COMMITTEE
Tuesday, October 1, 2019 Meeting
Location: Carmel City Hall Caucus Rooms,2nd Floor, 1 Civic Square, Carmel, IN 46032
Members Present: Alan Potasnik(Committee Chairman), Joshua Kirsh, & Laura Campbell
Members Absent: John Adams
Staff Present: Rachel Keesling(Planning Administrator), Mike Hollibaugh(Director), &Nathan Chavez(Recording
Secretary& Sign Administrator)
Legal Counsel: John Molitor
Time of Meeting: 6:00 PM
The Commercial Committee met to consider the following items:
1. TABLED TO NOV. 7—Docker Nro. 119050014 DP/ D S: Avid Hotel
I717C1Cl.LT' �VVr��'rlTiD�DZf12C7TiOTGT
2. TABLED TO NOV. 7—D�et-Ne 190500 ct��
first floor tenants)on 1.23 acres. The building will-be 50,286 sq. ft., 4 stories/155' tall, and will have 97+parking
icz of Nelson& Frankenbe
Saamrajya, LLC.
3. Docket No. 19060019 DP/ADLS: Franciscan Orthopedic Center of Excellence.
The applicant seeks site plan and design approval for a 4 story, 236,231 sq. ft. Orthopedic hospital, surgery
center, medical office building, and 664 space parking garage on 10.8 acres. The site is located at approximately
10800 Illinois Street. The site is zoned MC/Meridian Corridor. Filed by Marty Rosenberg of Methodist Sports.
Petitioners: Marty Rosenberg(Meridian Development), Robert Hicks(Hall Render), Bob Harmeyer(MSKTD),
Jennifer Lasch (Cripe), &Alyssa Prazeau(Context)
Bob Harmeyer:
• In the Submitted Packet(page 3)contains the outstanding issues from the Department Report,
remonstrators, and Plan Commission (Commission). They are Unified Development(UDO) Standards
which were not met, garage bicycle parking, site lighting, number of parking spaces, headlines coming
out of the garage and site, garage lighting, image, look, &feel of the garage, generator testing, and
outdoor rehab fields noise.
• There are separate tabs addressing each concern and how we have or plan on addressing them. Would you
like me to go through each item?Alan Potasnik: Yes.
• UDO standards not met(page 4): There are a few items. The accessory structure height and two primary
buildings on the site. We did not meet the zoning requirements for the site. Variances were submitted to
the Board of Zoning Appeals(BZA)and both were approved September 23rd,2019. We are now in
compliance with those requirements.
• Non-compliant signage: In the original proposal, signage was not complaint with the standards. We have
revised the submission to remove signage that was not complaint and replace with complaint signage.
Commercial Committee Minutes 10-01-19 1