HomeMy WebLinkAboutC5.0 Grading Plan�
s°
z
�
�
DRAINAGE SUMMARY
• SIIE ACREAGE (�ISIDRBANCE AREA) = 1.54 ACRES
• OFFSIIE/UPSTREAM ACREAGE = 0.00 ACRES
• ALLOWABLE RELEASE RAiE/OETENiION VOLUME _
• THE SIIE IS CIIRRENTLY SERVE� BV A MASIER PLANNED WET
POND WEST OF 1HE SIiE. iHE PROPOSED CURVE NUMBER (94)
IS HIGHER THAN THE ORIGINALLV DESIGNED CURVE NUMBER (93).
HOWEVER, THE AS-BUILT CONDITION Of THE POND ALLOWS FOR
THE INCREASE IN IMPERNOUS AREA WHILE STILL RELEASING
SLOWER THAN ORIGINALLY DESIGNED. REFER TO THE DRAINAGE
REPORT FOR SUPPORTNG CALCULATONS.
• POST DEVELOPED 10-YEAR DISCHARGE = 3.09 CFS
• POST DEVELOPED 10-YEAR DISCHARGE _].50 CFS
(NOT ACCOUNTING FOR STORM SEWER COLLECTION AND
MASIER PLANNE� DETENTION)
MINIMUM FLOOD PROTECTION GRADE (MFPG)
1HE MINIMIIM FLOOD PROIECPON GRAOE (MFPG) IS THE HIGHEST OF 2 FEET ABOVE THE MAJOR FLOOD SOURCE OR FL00�
ROl11E, 1 FOOT ABOVE THE LOCAL FLOOD SOURCE OR FL000 ROUIE, OR 12 INCHES ABOVE THE AOJACENT ROApWAY. FOR
THIS PROJECT RiE MINIIAUM FLOOD PROIECTION GftADE IS 843.16.
MINIMUM LOWEST ADJACENT GRADE (MLAG)
MINIMUM LOWEST A�JACENT GRA�E (MLAG)IS THE HIGHEST OF 2 FEET A90VE RiE MAJOR FL00� SOURCE OR FLOOD
ROIIiE, 2 FEET ABOVE THE SPILLWAV ELEVATION OG RiE �ETENTION FAQLRV, OR 1 FOOT ABOVE THE LOCAL FL00�
SOURCE OR FL00� ROUTE FOR Ri15 PROJECT RiE MINIMUM LOWEST A�JACENT GRA�E IS 840.93.
�ESiIMAIED LOCATION OF E%ISTING GEOTHERMAL LINE
CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DEPiH AND LOCATON PRIOR TO CONSiRUCTON
LL=& J 2
839.55 M.E.
� PONDWO I MITS ��
I'
/
/
� �
/ ��
A
\��\\j\�\� ���\ \ \ \
�����. \\\ � `��m m ucr _
RELEA5E0 FOR CONSTRIICTI�N
Su6jec��o compliance with allregula�ions
of S�a�e antl Local Codes
City of Carmel
�
�{�n„� i,.va�'
DATE: 06��9�20
c�
�
_ l l/ _
_$�---- � �,
�� -
��— _
� �� \ I
APPROXIMAIE LIMITS OFJ
FUNRE PARCEL
861.06 M.E.
i.._\
uce — u �
cE = ucE
-iBA1 �3 EL=8d8 05 �--�
SEf MAG NAIL �,
l � �
� � � �
,� ,
I / E�G
ESIIMATE� LWEWORK J /
NOTINCLU�ED IN SURVEY
. �. , � \ y v \ \ \ \ v \ � \ � \ \ � F�
�
EXISTING LEGEND
ASPHALT L1NE aaaryac GqNT OF BEGINNING/COMMENCEMENT
9UIL�ING LWE � TRAFFlC SIGNAL POLE
• STORAI INL£T (M)/(re) IAEASORE�/RECORO
� CURB INLET • SET RE6AR/CAP 'FIRA1 0124"
— SLOPE ARROW 6 FIBER OP➢C MARKER
e PONER POLE m POV£R MEiER
m IELEPHONE HAND HOLE/BOX
w WAIER VALVE O JUNClION BOX
SIGN � ROW MONUMENT
4 LIGHT POLE � FlNISHED FLOOR ELEVAlION
� U➢LITY POLE IEMPORARY BENCHIAARK (iBM)
v J�
\ / \
..
/ �
/ �
5 �
� \
\ CURB RAMP SHALL BE RECONS1RUClED
TO MEET ADA COMPLIANCE
(< L50 CRO55 SLOPE
� < 1:12 RUNNING SLOPE)
\
�
� �
�
�
/ / \
\� �
�
\
�
�
\
�
�
\
�
�
\
\
�
\
Indiano Utilities Protection Service
� NORTH
�
�
��
before you dig OGRAP5IC S3A�LE IN FEE60
GRADING NOTES
1. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL E%ISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND STRUCTURES ON THE
SITE AND IMMEDIATELV NOTIFV iHE ENGMEER OF ANV OISCREPANQES PRIOR
TO STARTING WORK.
2 ALL PAbEMENT SPOT GRADE ELEVATONS AND RIM ELEVATIONS WIIHIN OR
ALONG CURB AND GUTIER REFER TO EDGE OF PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS UNLESS
OTHERNISE NOTED.
S ALL ELEVAPONS SHOWN DEPICT FINISHED GRA�E OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT
UNLE55 OIHERVASE NOTED. GENERAL CONiRACTOR TO WORDINAIE WIIH
EXCAVAlION, LANDSCAPE AND PAVING SOBCONTRACTORS REGARDING TOPSOIL
THICKNESS FOR LANDSCAPE AREAS AND PAVElAENT SECTION 1HICKNESS FOR
PAVED AREAS TO PROPERLY ENSURE ADEQUATE CUT TO ESTABLISH SUBGRAOE
ELEVAPONS.
4. NO EARTHEN SLOPE SHALL BE GREATER THAN 3:1, UNLE55 OTHERWISE NOTED.
5. MAXIMUM SLOPE IN ACCESSIBLE PARNING SPACES AND LOADING ZONES SHALL
NOT EXCEED 2.09. IN ALL DIRECTONS.
6. MAXIMUM RUNNING SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 59. AND CROSS SLOPE SHALL
NOT EXCEED 2% ON ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUlES 11NLE55
OTHERWISE NOTE�.
J. WHEN NAIURAL FLOW OF �RAINAGE IS AWAY FROM CURB, CONIRACTOR TO
INSTALL REVERSE GUTIER PITCH.
UTILITY LEGEND
f� EX. HYDRANT
� EX. YiATER VALVE
�'Oj E%. SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
,���0' E%. SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT
E%. STORM MANHOLE
EX. STORM CATCH BASIN/INLET
� EX. GAS ME1ER
;-S EX. UGHT POLE
O � • � PROPOSED STORM STRUCTURE
O PROPWED SANITARY MANHOLE
PROPOSED SANITARV CLEANOUT
O � PROPOSED WATER SiRUCNRE
� � oBo PROPOSED LIGHT POLE
GRADING LEGEND
EP = EDGE OF PAVEMENT
FL = FLOW LINE/PAVEMENT GRADE
TC = TOP OF Cl1RB
ME = MATCH ELEVAlION
1F = TOP OF FOUNDATION
R = RIM ELEVATION
TW = TOP Of WALL
FG = FINISHED GRADE
TS = TOP OF STAIRS
85 = BOTTOM OF STAIRS
620 PROPOSED CONTOUR
_ RIDGE _ ftIDGE LME
X.XX% SLOPE AND FLOW DIRECTION
� 100-YEAR OVERLAND OVERFLOW ROUTE
� DETENTON BASIN 100-YEAR EMERGENCY
OVERLAND OVERFLOW ROUTE
— ���� PROPOSED SWALE
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL
iHE ONE HUNDRED (100) YEAR
FLOODPLAIN DOES NOT EXIST ON OR
ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT SIIE.
BENCHMARKS
SITE 9ENCHMARKS:
(LOCATIONS SHOWN ON SURVEV)
UNLE55 OTHERWISE NOTED, ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASEO UPON THE 1988
NORTH AIAERICAN VERTICAL DATUM (NAVD88). IT IS MY OPINION THAT THE
UNCERTAINtt IN THE ELEVATION OF THE PRQIECT BENCHMARK DOES NOT EXCEED
0.10 FOOT.
TBM{�1: SEf MAG NNL IN SI�EWALK ALONG EASTBOIIND W. CARMEL �RNE.
ELEV. = 84J.12
TBM(f2: SET MAG NAIL IN BACN-0FCURB OF LANDSCAPE ISLAND AT THE
INTERSECTION OF ENTRANCE OFF OF W. CARMEL DRNE AND THE SRE'S INTERNAL
PERIMETER ACCE55 DRNE.
ELEV.= 839.16
TBMk3: SEf MAG NAIL IN PAVEMENT IN SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SRE.
ELEV.= 838.05
>>
U U
N
H
Z
W
�
f
O
U
U
� �
2 ��
^ �u
�Al aiz
W �ii
� _ °ionw
o wa..i
i o aa�
�n
O H
Z o UZ Q
T m
m T
Q m p
.( �"e'�WsRreco�r��
N0.
* �� PE11400406 '�. *
'� � SIRi Cf :�� �'
�O�Fr_ rxoiaxn.'...C���
�
li
�
`
Z
�
LL
Z
�
`J
��x
W
� �
W �
�^ �
V / I I I
Y U
�
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
10/16/2019
KHA PROJECT N0.
170110000
SHEET NUMBER
C5.0