HomeMy WebLinkAboutLetter #125 Jeannine & John Hong - second submission
Shestak, Joe
From:J9 <jhong1@indy.rr.com>
Sent:Saturday, August 15, 2020 11:11 AM
To:Shestak, Joe
Subject:Ambleside PUD
Follow Up Flag:Follow up
Flag Status:Flagged
**** This is an EXTERNAL email. Please exercise caution and Do Not open attachments or click links from unknown
senders or unexpected email. ****
I am a Saddle Creek resident. I do not opppose the Ambleside development, but changes need to be made to protect
Saddle Creek residents and maintain density standards.
1. Do not extend Saddle Creek pond and leave existing tree line. Ambleside should create their own retention pond.
2. There should be a southeast side buffer. Put Ambleside pond there or match the lot widths on east side with
generous tree space buffer.
3. Ambleside should create generous greenspace and have all their own amenities and do so by reducing the density of
the overall development to open up land for that purpose.
4. Medians should be placed at entrances to slow traffic along with stop signs and pedestrian raised walkways that
would also help to slow traffic.
5. There should be entrance buffers and green spaces at adjoining Saddle Creek and Ambleside entrances or preferably,
Ambleside should have it’s own entrances separate from Saddle Creek.
Again, I do not oppose this development, but density needs to be reduced along with the above items I mentioned to
make it compatible with and show respect for residents of Saddle Creek.
Jeannine and John Hong
Saddle Creek Residents
Sent from my iPad
1