HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings of Fact/Ballot Sheets FINDINGS OF FAC - USE VARIANCE
CARMEL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
(Petitioner to fill out first 1-5+first 2 blanks)
PZ-2020-00101 UV
Docket No:
Daniel & Amy Rexroth, Carmel Psychotogy
Petitioner:
The grant of this variance will not be contrary to the public interest, due to the existence of special conditionls:
such that enforcement of the Unified Development Ordinance will result in unnecessary hardship because:
(see attached)
2 The grant of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general 'welfare of the
community because:
(see attached)
3. The use or value of the area adjacent to the subject property will not be substantiaiiy affected in any adverse
manner because:
,see attached)
4. The need for the variance an Vises from a natural condition peculiar to the subject property because:
(see attached)
5, The granting of this variance does not substantially interfere with the Carmel Comprehensive Plan because:
(see attached)
DECISION
IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals that Use Variance Docket No.
PZ_2a2d_ 00l(2I U1/ is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board, which are
ncorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof.
,tp this :3 day of 1•1 aVe w►ktY . 2C ad
CHAIR P SON, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals
SEC5614/64
TARY, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals
Conditions of approval of the Board, if any, are listed on the Letter of Grant.
Page 1* of 12 Fiierame use variance application&instructions 2C20 Rev. 1.11202C
CARMEL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
FINDINGS OF FACT FOR USE VARIANCE
Docket No. PZ-2020-00161 UV
Petitioner: Daniel & Amy Rexroth, Carmel Psychology
I. The grant of this variance will not be contrary to the public interest, due to the
existence of special condition(s) such that enforcement of the Unified
Development Ordinance will result in unnecessary hardship because:
230 PI Street NE is located within an area that has been under redevelopment and
growing as a mixed-use community in the heart of downtown Carmel. The property site
in question is located on a very small lot that is proximate to other nonresidential uses.
The small lot and structure are not likely to be of scale and size that would be used for
redevelopment investment, given the land use and ownership patterns of the area.
2. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety,
morals and general welfare of the community because:
This will help to preserve the integrity of the area as no site changes are planned that will
impact the footprint of the structure. The proposed use is very low impact with a single
full time psychologist and two part time psychologists (alternating days).
3. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance
will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because:
The current property will not change in structure or design. There are no plans to
change the landscaping with the exception of the removal of any dead trees and plants.
The property will be privately owned and operated and no longer a rental property,
which will provide consistent upkeep and care with very quiet, low profile operations.
4. The need for the variance arises form a natural condition peculiar to the subject
property because:
The parcel is located in an area where land uses are in transition. The parcel is a very
small lot and not of a configuration that lends itself to redevelopment for any purpose
without land assembly.
5. The approval of this variance does not substantially interfere with the
Carmel/Clay Comprehensive Plan because;
The petitioners recognize that the area is going through substantial redevelopment and
anticipates that traditional zoning will be replaced with form-based:zoning regulations
that will focus on regulating land use;therefore this proposed variance from residential
to residential with business use with no changes to the land or structure will maintain
the current plan and design of the surrounding neighborhood.
BALLOT SHEET for US1 VARIANCE FLINGS OF FACT
CARMEL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
(Petitioner to fill out first 2 blanks)
PZ-2020-00161 UV
Docket No.:
Daniel &Amy Rexroth, Carmel Psychology
Petitioner.
2.
3_
4.
5,
DATED THIS 3 DAY OF Move hibty ,2,�''.�1
Board Mem r
Page 10 of 12 Filename: use variance application&instructions 2020 Rev. 1/212020
PIP
BALLOT SHEET for USE VARIANCE FINDINGS OF FACT
CARMEL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
(Petitioner to fill out first 2 blanks)
PZ-2020-00161 UV
Docket No:
Daniel & Amy Rexroth, Carmel Psychology
Petitioner:
1.
2
3
4.
5.
DATED THIS 3 DAY OF N OVe hsl ev 23 20 .
Board Mem
Page 10 of 12 Filename use variance application&instructions 2020 Rev. 1/2/2020
BALLOT SHEET for USE VARIANCE FINDINGS OF FACT
CARMEL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
(Petitioner to fill out first 2 blanks)
PZ-2020-00161 w
Docket No.:
Daniel &Amy Rexroth, Carmel Psychology
Petitioner:
1.
2
3.
4
5.
DATED THIS 3 DAY OF Nave h laty z0 ,
Boar ember
Page 10 of 12 Filename use variance apolicahon&instructions 2020 Rev. 1i2d2020
BALLOT SHEET for USE VARIANCE FINDINGS.OF FACT
CARMEL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
(Petitioner to fill out first 2 blanks)
Pz-2020-00161 UV
Docket No:
Daniel &Amy Rexroth, Carmel Psychology
Petitioner:
r7
2
3_
4.
5.
DATED THIS 3 DAY OF tOVe hilt✓ 2C Z
Board Member
Page 10 of 12 Filename use variance application&instructions 2020 Rev. 1/212420
111111"
SHEET for USE VARIANCE FINDINGS OF FACT
CARMEL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
(Petittoner to fill out first 2 blanks)
PZ-2020-00161 UV
Docket No
Daniel &Amy Rexroth, Carmel Psychology
Petitioner:
1 A f
2
3.
DATED THIS 3 DAY OF OVeivtLete
Board -'2rber.1(11
Page 10 of 12 Filerrame use variance apelicaaor,8,instructions 2020 Rev. li2/2020