Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDrainage Report (Revised Jan. 2021)DRAINAGE REPORT FOR NEW COMMERCIAL WAREHOUSE ADDITION 4511 W. 99™ STREET CARMEL, INDIANA December 2019 Revised January 2021 PREPARED BY: Total Engineering Solutions Co., LLC 9702 E. Washington St., Suite 400-133 Indianapolis, IN 46229 ITEM TECHNICAL DRAINAGE REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Project Narrative & Calculations Pre-Developed Drainage Basin Map Post-Developed Drainage Basin Map Hydrograph Summary Report and Hydrographs BMP Hydrograph Soils Map Flood Plain (FIRM) Map PAGE 1-5 6 7 8-27 28 29-31 32 DRAINAGE REPORT NEW WAREHOUSE BillLDING ADDITION PROJECT NARRATIVE: This project consists of a constructing a new 13,000 sf addition to an existing industrial warehouse building located at 4511 W. 99th Street in Carmel. In addition to the building expansion, the project will include a new truck doc, concrete pavement parking area, and utility connections. The proposed project will disturb approximately 0.68 acres of the existing developed site. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The existing property is currently developed as an industrial warehouse business with asphalt and concrete pavement, truck docks, drives, parking area, and utilities. The west side of the property is currently wooded and includes a concrete slab from a previous building (which slab will be demolished as part of this project). The developed portion of the property (identified as Basin #1), including pavement and building roofs, sheet drain to existing storm inlets located within the drive and parking area. The storm sewers convey stormwater from the site to the public storm sewer system in 99th Street. The undeveloped portion of the property (identified as Basin #2), primarily the wooded area, sheets drains to the west off to the adjacent property. Site Soils Site soils within the property and project area are classified as Urban land Crosby silt loam (UcfA) which is a Group C soil and moderate draining. Predicted Storm Runoff As predicted from the attached Hydrographs (Rational Method), the pre-developed storm water runoff rates for the two drainage basins are as follows: Storm Event Q2 QIO Q25 Q10o Basin #1 0.72 cfs 1.06 cfs 1.22 cfs 1.47 cfs PROPOSED CONDITIONS: Basin #2 0.297 cfs 0.455 cfs 0.534 cfs 0.653 cfs The proposed improvements include a new 13,000 sf addition to the existing industrial warehouse building built on the site, as well as additional concrete pavement area, and utility connection work. The proposed improvements will include demolition of an existing concrete slab but will still result -1 - in an increase of 0.456 acres in total impervious area. The total area disturbed by the project will be approximately 0 .682 acres. The proposed building addition and parking area will be constructed west of the existing improvements and extend into the wooded area identified as existing Basin #2. Upon completion of the work, all the new impervious area will be sheet drained to a proposed dry-detention area which will provide some amount of on-site storm water detention. The detention area will drain through a new storm water quality unit (see discussion below) to the existing storm sewer piping. As a result, the drainage area of Basin # 1 will increase and Basin #2 will decrease. The remaining area of Basin #2 will be undisturbed and continue to sheet drain to the west. Using the rational method, the stormwater runoff from the post-developed site, as predicted by the Hydrographs attached , is as follows: Storm Event Q2 QIO Q2s Q10o Basin #1 Post-Developed 2.69 cfs Basin #1 Pre-Developed 0.72 cfs 3.96 cfs 1.06 cfs 4.57 cfs 1.22 cfs 5.49 cfs 1.47 cfs Under the current City of Carmel Stormwater Technical Standards Manual, the allowable stormwater release rate for any new developments is 0.1 cfs per acre under a ten year storm (Q10) and 0.3 cfs per acre under a 100 year storm conditions (QlOO). The property falls within the old Mayflower Industrial Park which. was originally master planned with regards to drainage and stormwater detention. Therefore, the original development did not include or require any on-site detention or storm water quality measures by Hamilton County at the time of the original building and site development. Per Section 302.03, the allowable release rates for the existing drainage basins are as follows: Q10@ 0.10 cfs/Acre Q100 @ 0.30 cfs/Acre Basin #1 0.02 CFS 0.05 CFS Basin #2 0.05 CFS 0.15 CFS As designed, this project proposes on-site detention in order to reduce the peak stormwater release rate from the site. Due to the limited area and the shallow depth of the existing stormwater system both on-site and off-site, the pond must be relatively shallow. However, as shown in the attached hydrographs, the proposed detention area does allow the project to nearly meet the current City requirements for new development, albeit with a 1" orifice in the outfall structure. Using a 6" orifice, the detention area will reduce the peak runoff from Basin# 1 to significantly below the pre- existing which is the smallest size allowed per Section 302.06 conditions as shown in the table below. Storm Event Q2 QIO Q2s Q IOo Detention Release with 6" Orifice 0.44 cfs 0 .58 cfs 0.63 cfs 0.71 cfs Detention Release with 1" Orifice 0.027 cfs 0.030 cfs -2- Basin # 1 Pre-Developed 0.72 cfs 1.06 cfs 1.22 cfs 1.47 cfs Therefore, while the proposed design could meet the current City standards with a 1" or less orifice pipe at the outfall structure, the proposed use of a 6" orifice will reduce the post-developed runoff rates to about 50% of the current pre-developed rates. Storm Water Quality The project will disturb a total of 0.682 acres and under current ordinances and standards of the City of Carmel, must include stormwater quality measures for treating runoff. We looked at several alternatives for meeting the stormwater quality measures including an infiltration trench and bio-retention area, but the existing site grades and shallow storm sewers on site limited the options available. Therefore, the project as designed proposes the use of a flow through type hydro-dynamic separator type unit, specifically an Aqua-Swirl Xcelerator series model XC-3. As shown in flow through BMP calculations below and the BMP Hydrograph included in this report, the, first flush rain event rate required to be treated by the BMP is 0.817 cfs. The selected Aqua Swirl Model XC-3 has an approved treatment capacity of 1.13 cfs (per the City of Indianapolis design standards as adopted by the City of Carmel). A secondary BMP, as required by the City of Carmel, will consist of planting native grasses within the bottom of the dry detention pond. These grass plantings will provide some measure of treatment through the uptake of pollutants in the stormwater as well as absorb rainwater in the basin bottom after rain events. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS: The proposed project will disturb approximately 0.682 acres of the 2.47 acre site and the new development will significantly increase the hard surface (impervious) area of the current property. However, the peak runoff from the site will be detained by a new dry-detention area which will reduce the peak storm water runoff from the site to approximately 50% of the pre-developed conditions. The project will include two stormwater quality measures (BMP) to treat the Stormwater Quality Volume from the site. With the addition of stormwater treatment and existing detention, the proposed improvements will have no adverse impacts to the downstream stormwater infrastructure. -3- DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS Existing (Pre-Developed) Conditions The pre -developed project area includes 0.178 acres of existing concrete slab and 0.504 acres of wooded land. A summary of the current land use designations is as follows: Description Total Area Grass Pavement Roofs Basin #1 0.178 Acres 0.000 Acres 0.178 Acres 0.00 Acres Basin #2 0.504 Acres 0 .504 Acres 0.000 Acres 0.00 Acres Existing Basin # 1 Runoff (Rational Method) Q= CiA where C= Weighted Curve No. (Soil=0.20, Pavement= 0.85, Roof = 0.90) C = (0.178 X 0.85) /0.178 = 0.85 Time of Concentration (Tc) = 5 minutes Peak Storm Water Runoff(Q): Q2 = (0.85)(4 .75 in!hr)(0.178 acres)= 0.719 cfs Q10 = (0.85)(6.99 in!hr)(0.178 acres)= 1.06 cfs Q25 = (0.85)(8.08 inlhr)(0.178 acres) = 1.22 cfs Q100 = (0.85)(9.69 in!hr)(0.178 acres)= 1.47 cfs Existing Basin #2 Runoff (Rational Method) Q= CiA where C= Weighted Curve No. (Soil =0.20, Pavement= 0.85, Roof = 0.90) C = (0.504 X 0.20) /0.504 = 0.20 Time of Concentration (Tc) = 15 minutes Peak Storm Water Runoff (Q): Q2 = (0.20)(2 .97 in!hr)(0.504 acres)= 0.297 cfs Q10 = (0 .20)(4.55 inlhr)(0.504 acres)= 0.455 cfs Q25 = (0.20)(5.34 in!hr)(0.504 acres)= 0.534 cfs Q100 = (0.20)(6.53 in!hr)(0.504 acres)= 0.653 cfs Post Developed Conditions Description Total Area Pavement Basin #1 0.682 Acres 0.047 Acres 0.336 Acres 0.298 Acres Post Developed Runoff (Rational Method) Q=CiA where C= Weighted Curve No. (Soil =0.20, Pavement= 0.85, Roof= 0.90) C = (0.047 X 0.20) + (0.336 X 0.85) + (0.298 X 0 .90)/0.682 = 0 .83 -4- Time of Concentration (Tc) = 5 minutes Peak Storm Water Runoff(Q): Q2 = (0.83)(4.75 inlhr)(0.682 acres)= 2.69 cfs Q10 = (0.83)(6.99 inlhr)(0.682 acres)= 3.96 cfs Q25 = (0.83)(8.08 inlhr)(0.682 acres)= 4.57 cfs Q100 = (0.83)(9.69 inlhr)(0.682 acres)= 5.49 cfs FLOW THROUGH BMP SIZING: Contributing Drainage Area= 0.682 Acres (29 ,704 sf) Percent Impervious Area: 27,615 SF/29,704 SF= 0.929 (92 .9%) Water Quality Curve Number: CNwq = 98 .8 (From Exhibit 701-1) Based on a 1" Rain Event, 24 Hour storm, and Type II distribution, the Peak Storm Water Quality Volume as provided by the BMP Hydrograph = 0.82 cfs. POND OUTLET PIPE SIZING & CAP A CITY The proposed detention area outfall structure includes a 6" orifice on the inlet side, and a 12" RCP storm pipe on the outlet side. The capacity of the outlet pipe is calculated as follows: 12 " RCP at 0.25% Slope, Q full = (1.49/n)(A)(rH)213 (S)112 Qfull = (1.49/0.013)(0.78s sf)(0.25)213 (0.0025)112 = 1.77 cfs Pond Release rate at Q10 = 0.58 cfs < 1.77 cfs Pond Release rate at Q100 = 0.71 cfs < 1.77 cfs DOWNSTREAM PIPE CAP A CITY The pond outfall will be connected to an existing 18 " RCP pipe that runs east through the property and into 99th Street. The capacity of this existing storm pipe is calculated as follows: 18 " RCP at 0.36% Slope, Q full= (1.49/n)(A)(rHi13 (S)112 Qfull = (1.49/0.013)(1.77 sf)(0.375)213 (0.0036)112 = 6.31 cfs Pond Outfall at QlO = 0.58 cfs -5 - I -~~- 1 Scale: 1 n-50' I I I I I I I I I i \ 889 ~ "~ BASIN #2 \ 0.504 Acres \ C=0.20 890 / \ ! ® 6 ~6V I I I JADAM PROPERTY GROUP NEW WAREHOUSE ADDITION PRE DEVELOPED BASIN MAP 181 -JADAM PROPERTY GROUP, LLC 4511 W. 99TIJ STREET :},'=L,.Iti --foP <Q -/ -/ / -raln/ot ll89. 16 -.~7(1/l" M6.67 (18" M6.67 (12" . ---~ Ul I s_____. ~ -~ I a.za. ::::>0<( ot-~ c::::oz C) OW >-<(<( 1--Wal c::::wo w::>W a.oa. OIO c::::w...J a.C::::W ~~Gj <(>0 0$1--<CwW • 0 Za_ "-L~ ~~ {/) 1 Hy d rog rap h sum rna ry R e PQOiow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD ® Civil 3D ® 2018 by Autodesk , Inc . v2018 .3 Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Hyd. Inflow Maximum Total Hydrograph No. type flow interval Peak volume hyd(s) elevation strge used Description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cuft) (ft) (cuft) 1 Rational 0.719 1 5 216 ------------------Pre-Developed Basin 1 2 Rational 2.688 1 5 806 ------------------Post Developed Basin #1 3 Reservoir 0.443 1 9 785 2 888.34 664 Post Deve loped Release Storm Hydrograph .gpw Return Period : 2 Year Tuesday, 12 I 17 I 2019 ....... b Hydrograph Report Hydra fl ow Hydrographs Extension fo r AutoCAD® C ivil 3 D® 2018 by Autodesk, Inc. v2018.3 Hyd . No. 1 Pre-Developed Basin 1 Hydrograph type Storm frequency Time interval Drainage a rea Intensity IDF Curve Q (cfs) 1.00 0 .90 0 .80 0.70 0 .60 0 .50 0.40 0 .30 / / v 0.20 v 0 .10 0 .00 = = = = = = Rationa l Peak discharge 2 yrs Time to peak 1 min Hyd . volume 0 .178 ac Runoff coeff. 4 . 749 in/hr Tc by User INDY.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact Pre-Developed Basin 1 Hyd . No . 1 --2 Year / "' / I' ' "' / v " ~ / "' 1 Tuesday, 12 /1 7/2019 = 0 .719 cfs = 0.08 hrs = 216 cuft = 0 .85 = 5.00 min = 1/1 "' "\ ~ "' Q (cfs) 1.00 0 .90 0 .80 0.70 0 .60 0 .50 0.40 0 .30 0.20 0.10 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .1 0 .1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 .1 0 .2 0 .00 0.2 -HydNo.1 Time (hrs) 2 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 30® 2018 by Autodesk, Inc . v2018 .3 Tuesday , 12 I 17 I 2019 Hyd. No.2 Post Developed Basin #1 Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 2.688 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak = 0 .08 hrs Time interval = 1 min Hyd . volume = 806 cuft Drainage area = 0.682 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.83 Intensity = 4.749 in/hr Tc by User = 5.00 min IDF Curve = INDY .IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1 Post Developed Basin #1 Q (cfs) Hyd . No. 2 --2 Year Q (cfs) 3.00 -.-----r------.------.------,-----,-----,.---r----.-------.----.-3 .00 0.00 --1------'-------'------'------'------'--------'---'------"-----'----_,._ 0 .00 0.0 0.0 0 .0 0 .1 0 .1 0 .1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 .2 0 .2 -HydNo.2 Time (hrs) 4 Hy d rog rap h sum rna ry Re PQfrtlow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD ® Civil 3D® 2018 by Autodesk , Inc . v2018.3 Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Hyd . Inflow Maximum Total Hydrograph No . type flow interval Peak volume hyd(s) elevation strge used Description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cuft) (ft) (cuft) 1 Rational 1.057 1 5 317 ~~----------------Pre-Developed Basin 1 2 Rational 3.953 1 5 1,186 ............. ---·--------Post Developed Basin #1 3 Reservo ir 0.575 1 9 1,160 2 888 .60 995 Post Developed Release Storm Hydrograph .gpw Return Period : 10 Year Tuesday , 12 I 17 I 2019 \ \ 3 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hyd rographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2018 by Autodesk , Inc. v2018 .3 Tuesday , 12/17 /2019 Hyd. No.1 Pre-Developed Basin 1 Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 1.057 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 0.08 hrs Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 317 cuft Drainage area = 0.178 ac Runoff coeff. = 0 .85 Intensity = 6.984 in/hr Tc by User = 5.00 min IDF Curve = INDY.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1 Pre-Developed Basin 1 0 (cfs) Hyd . No . 1 --10 Year 0 (cfs) 2 .00 ,-----,----,---.----.------r------.---r----.---.,.---.-2 .00 1.00 0 .00 ~--_...L_ __ __L_ __ _.J..... __ _....L __ ___l __ _..Jc__ __ L__ __ .L._ __ ...J...._ _ _____.:~ 0 .00 0.0 0.0 0 .0 0 .1 0 .1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0 .2 -HydNo.1 Time (hrs) 4 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 30® 2018 by Autodesk , Inc. v2018 .3 Tuesday , 12/17/2019 Hyd. No.2 Post Developed Basin #1 Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 3.953 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 0 .08 hrs Time interval = 1 min Hyd . volume = 1,186 cuft Drainage area = 0.682 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.83 Intensity = 6.984 in/hr Tc by User = 5.00 min IDF Curve = INDY.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1 Post Developed Basin #1 0 (cfs) Hyd . No . 2 --10 Year 0 (cfs) 4 .00 ,----,----,-------,------,----,-----.---r----.-----.-----. 4.00 1.00 0.00 ....6---___.J.__ __ __J_ __ _L.. __ __j__ __ ___,_ __ _____. ___ c__ __ .J__ __ __,__ __ ~ 0.00 0 .0 0.0 0 .0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0 .2 -HydNo.2 Time (hrs) 6 Hyd rog rap h sum rna ry Re PQ!tlow Hydrographs Extens ion for AutoCAD ® Civ il 3D ® 2018 by Autodesk , Inc. v20 18.3 Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Hyd . Inflow Maximum Total Hydrograph No. type flow interval Peak volume hyd(s) elevation strge used Description (origin) (cfs) (m i n) (m i n) (cuft) (ft) (cuft) 1 Rationa l 1.222 1 5 367 ------------------Pre-Developed Basin 1 2 Rationa l 4 .573 1 5 1,372 -----------------Post Developed Basin #1 3 Reservo ir 0.633 1 9 1,344 2 888.74 1,158 Post Developed Release Storm Hydrograph .gpw Return Period : 25 Year Tuesday , 12 I 17 I 2019 I / [ I -, 5 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrograp hs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 30® 2018 by Autodesk , Inc. v2018 .3 Tuesday, 12 /17 /20 19 Hyd. No.1 Pre-Developed Basin 1 Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 1.222 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak = 0 .08 hrs Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 367 cuft Drainage area = 0.178 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.85 Intensity = 8.078 in/hr Tc by User = 5 .00 min IDF Curve = INDY.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1 Pre-Developed Basin 1 Q (cfs) Hyd . No . 1 --25 Year Q (cfs) 2 .00 ...-----.----,------r------r------r------,---,.....---,....----,.-----.-2 .00 1.00 0 . 00 ~----'-------'-----'------'--------'---------'---'------'--------'----31--0 . 00 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .1 0 .1 0 .1 0.1 0 .1 0 .1 0 .2 0.2 -HydNo.1 Time (hrs ) Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2018 by Autodesk , Inc. v2018 .3 Hyd. No.2 Post Developed Basin #1 Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak Time interva l = 1 min Hyd . volume Drainage area = 0 .682 ac Runoff coeff. Intensity = 8 .078 in/hr Tc by User IDF Curve = INDY.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact Q (cfs) 5 .00 4 .00 3.00 2 .00 1.00 0 .00 I I v v Post Developed Basin #1 Hyd . No . 2 --25 Year I "' I v \ 1'\ v \ "" \ 6 Tuesday, 12/17 /20 19 = 4.573 cfs = 0 .08 hrs = 1,372 cuft = 0.83 = 5 .00 min = 1/1 '1'\ \ Q (cfs) 5 .00 4 .00 3 .00 2 .00 1.00 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .1 0 .1 0 .1 0.1 0.1 0 .1 0 .2 0 .00 0 .2 -HydNo.2 Time (hrs) I& 8 Hy d rog rap h sum rna ry Re PROiow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D ® 2018 by Autodesk , Inc . v2018 .3 Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Hyd . Inflow Maximum Total Hydrograph No. type flow interval Peak volume hyd(s) elevation strge used Description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cuft) (ft) (cuft) 1 Rational 1.465 1 5 440 ------------------Pre-Developed Basin 1 2 Rational 5.482 1 5 1,645 ----------------Post Developed Basin #1 3 Reservoir 0.7 12 1 9 1,614 2 888 .93 1,40 1 Post Developed Release Storm Hydrograph .gpw Return Period : 100 Year Tuesday , 12/17/2019 I I 7 Hydrograph Report Hydra flow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2018 by Autodesk, Inc . v2018.3 Tuesday , 12/17 /20 19 Hyd. No.1 Pre-Developed Basin 1 Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 1.465 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 0 .08 hrs Time interval = 1 min Hyd . volume = 440 cuft Drainage area = 0.178 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.85 Intensity = 9 .685 in/hr Tc by User = 5.00 min IDF Curve = INDY.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1 Pre-Developed Basin 1 0 (cfs) Hyd . No . 1 --100 Year 0 (cfs) 2 .00 --.------.----.----.-------.-------,------,---,----,-----..,..----, 2 .00 1.00 0.00 ..z_ __ ....J_ __ __j_ __ ...._L __ _..J... __ _...J... __ --l. __ ___JL__ __ ...._ __ ...L_ __ ~ 0 .00 0.0 0 .0 0.0 0 .1 0 .1 0 .1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 .2 0 .2 -Hyd No .1 Time (hrs) Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extens ion for AutoCAD® Civ il 3D® 2018 by Autodesk , Inc. v20 18 .3 Hyd. No.2 Post Developed Basin #1 Hydrograph type Storm frequency Time interval Drainage area Intensity IDF Curve Q (cfs) 6 .00 5 .00 4 .00 = = = = = = Rational Peak discharge 100 yrs Time to peak 1 min Hyd. volume 0.682 ac Runoff coeff. 9.685 in/hr Tc by User INDY.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact Post Developed Basin #1 Hyd . No .2--100 Year I ' / \ / ' I \ / \. v \ / 3 .00 2 .00 v v I 1.00 0 .00 8 Tuesday , 12/17 /2019 = 5.482 cfs = 0.08 hrs = 1,645 cuft = 0.83 = 5 .00 min = 1/1 \. \ \ Q (cfs) 6 .00 5.00 4.00 3 .00 2 .00 1.00 0 .0 0 .0 0.0 0 .1 0 .1 0 .1 0.1 0.1 0 .1 0 .2 0 .00 0 .2 -HydNo.2 Time (hrs) Pond Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2018 by Autodesk , Inc . v2018 .3 Pond No . 1 -Dry Detention Area Pond Data 3 Tuesday , 12 I 17 I 2019 Contours -User-defined contour areas. Average end area method used for volume calcu lation . Beg ining Elevation= 887 .60 ft Stage I Storage Table Stage (ft) Elevation (ft) Contour area (sqft) I ncr. Storage (cuft) Total storage (cuft) 0.00 887 .60 500 0 0 0.40 888 .00 740 248 248 1.40 889 .00 1,750 1,245 1,493 2.40 890 .00 7,800 4 ,775 6,268 Culvert I Orifice Structures Weir Structures [A] [B) [C) [PrfRsr] [A] [B) [C) [D) Rise (in) 12.00 6.00 0.00 0 .00 Crest Len (ft) = 4 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Span (in) 12.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 Crest El. (ft) = 889 .70 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. Barrels 0 0 WeirCoeff. = 3.33 3.33 3.33 3.33 Invert El. (ft) = 887 .60 887 .60 0.00 0.00 Weir Type = Rect Length (ft) = 14.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 Multi-Stage = Yes No No No Slope(%) = 0.25 0.25 0.00 nla N-Value = .013 .013 .013 nla Orifice Coeff. = 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 Exfil.(inlhr) = 0.200 (by Contour) Multi-Stage = nla Yes No No TW Elev. (ft) = 0.00 Note : CulverVOri fice outflows are analyzed under inlet (i c) and outlet (oc) control. Weir ri se r s checked for orifice conditions (ic) and submergence (s). Stage (ft) 3.00 2.00 1.00 ---- 0.00 0.00 . If 0.50 -TotaiQ \ ~ ,...... 1.00 -culvA -WeirA Stage I Discharge - 1.50 2.00 2 .50 -CulvB -WeirB -WeirC 3.00 -WeirD 3.50 Elev (ft) 890.60 889 .60 888 .60 887 .60 4 .00 Discharge (cfs) -user -Exfiltration Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hyd rographs Exte nsion for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2018 by Autodesk, Inc. v2018 .3 Hyd. No.3 Post Developed Release Hydrograph type Storm frequency Time interval Inflow hyd . No . Reservoir name = Reservoir = 2 yrs = 1 min = 2 -Post Developed Basin #1 = Dry Detention Area Peak discharge Time to peak Hyd . volume Max . Elevation Max . Storage Sto rage Ind icat ion me th od used . Exfil tration ext racted from Outflow . Q (cfs) 3 .00 2 .00 1.00 0 .00 0.0 ~ ~ ' loo... 0.2 0 .3 0 .5 0 .7 Post Developed Release Hyd . No . 3 --2 Year 0 .8 1 .0 1.2 1.3 1.5 1 .7 = = = = = 1 .8 -HydNo.3 -HydNo.2 I I I I I I I I Total storage used = 664 cuft 2 Tuesday , 12 I 17 I 2019 0.443 cfs 0 .15 hrs 785 cuft 888.34 ft 664 cuft 2 .0 Q (cfs ) 3.00 2 .00 1.00 0 .00 2 .2 Time (hrs) Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2018 by Autodesk, Inc. v2018 .3 Hyd. No.3 Post Developed Release Hydrograph type Storm frequency Time interval Inflow hyd. No. Reservoir name = Reservoir = 10 yrs = 1 min = 2 -Post Developed Basin #1 = Dry Detention Area Peak discharge Time to peak Hyd. volume Max. Elevation Max. Storage Storage Indication method used . Exfiltration extracted from Outflow. Q (cfs) 4 .00 3 .00 2 .00 1.00 0 .00 0 .0 -.............. r-----.-r-----.- Post Developed Release Hyd . No .3--10 Year r---....... 0.2 0 .3 0.5 0.7 0 .8 1 .0 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.7 = = = = = 1.8 -HydNo.3 -HydNo.2 II I I I I II Total storage used = 995 cuft 5 Tuesday, 12/17/2019 0.575 cfs 0.15 hrs 1,160 cuft 888.60 ft 995 cuft 2 .0 Q (cfs) 4.00 3 .00 2.00 1.00 0.00 2.2 Time (hrs) Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2018 by Autodesk , Inc. v2018 .3 Hyd. No.3 Post Developed Release Hydrograph type Storm frequency Time interval Inflow hyd. No . Reservoir name = Reservoir = 25 yrs = 1 min = 2 -Post Developed Basin #1 = Dry Detention Area Peak discharge Time to peak Hyd. volume Max. Elevation Max. Storage Storage Indication method used . Exfi ltration extracted from Outflow. Q (cfs) 5 .00 4 .00 3.00 2 .00 1.00 0 .00 0.0 -.. ............... r----.......___ Post Developed Release Hyd . No. 3 --25 Year r----- 0.2 0.3 0 .5 0 .7 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.7 = = = = = 1.8 7 Tuesday , 12/17/2019 0.633 cfs 0.15 hrs 1 ,344 cuft 888 .74 ft 1,158 cuft 2 .0 Q (cfs) 5 .00 4 .00 3.00 2 .00 1.00 0 .00 2.2 -HydNo.3 -Hyd No .2 Ill IIIII Total storage used= 1,1 58 cuft Time (hrs) Hydrograph Report Hydraflo w Hydrog rap hs Extension fo r AutoCAD® C ivil 3 D® 2018 by Autodesk, Inc . v2018 .3 Hyd . No.3 Post Developed Release Hydrograph type Storm frequency Time interval Inflow hyd . No. Reservoir name = Reservoir = 100 yrs = 1 min = 2-Post Developed Basin #1 = Dry Detention Area Peak discharge Time to peak Hyd. volume Max. Elevation Max. Storage Storage Indicat ion method used . Exfil tra tion extracted f rom Outflow. Q (cfs) 6 .00 5 .00 4 .00 3 .00 2 .00 1.00 0.00 0.0 .... ------- 0.2 0 .3 0.5 0 .7 Post Developed Release Hyd . No. 3 --100 Year r--- 0 .8 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.7 = = = = = 1 .8 9 Tuesday , 12 /1 7 /20 19 0.712 cfs 0.15 hrs 1 ,614 cuft 888 .93 ft 1 ,401 cuft 2 .0 Q (cfs ) 6.00 5 .00 4.00 3.00 2 .00 1.00 0.00 2 .2 -HydNo.3 -HydNo.2 II I I I I I I Tota l storage used = 1.401 cuft Time (hrs) Pond Report Hyd raflo w Hydrographs Extension for AutoCA D® Civil 3D® 20 18 by Autodes k , Inc. v20 18.3 Pond No. 1 -Dry Detention Pond Pond Data 2 Tuesday , 12 /17 /2019 Contours -User-defined contour areas . Ave rage end area method used fo r volume ca lcu lat ion . Beg ining Elevation= 88 7.60 ft Stage I Storage Table Stage (ft) Elevation (ft) Contour area (sqft) lncr. Storage (cuft) Total storage (cuft) 0.00 887 .60 500 0 0 0.4 0 888.00 740 248 248 1.40 889.00 1,750 1,245 1,493 2.40 890 .00 7,800 4,775 6,268 Culvert I Orifice Structures Weir Structures [A] [B) [C) [PrfRsr) [A] [B) [C) [D) Rise (in) 12 .00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Crest Len (ft) = 4 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Span (in) 12 .00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Crest El. (ft) = 889 .70 0.00 0.00 0.00 No . Barrels 0 0 Weir Coeff. = 3.33 3.33 3.33 3.3 3 Invert El. (ft) = 88 7.60 88 7.60 0.00 0.00 Weir Type = Reel Length (ft) = 14 .00 0.50 0.00 0.00 Multi-5tage = Yes No No No Slope(%) = 0.25 0 .25 0.00 n/a N-Value = .013 .013 .0 13 n/a Orifice Coeff. = 0.60 0 .60 0.60 0.60 Exfil.(i n/hr) = 0.000 (by Co ntour) Multi-Stage = n/a Yes No No TW Elev. (ft) = 0.00 Note: Culvert/Orifice outflows are analyzed under inlet (i c) and outl et (oc) control. W eir risers checked for orifi ce cond iti ons (i c) and submergence (s). Stage (ft) Stage I Discharge Elev (ft) 3.00 ....,.--------r------.,--------r------r-------.---------.-890 .60 \ 2.00 -Ht-------t-------+-------+-------t-------+-------+-889 .60 1.00 --H-------+-------+------+------+-------+------+ 888 .60 0.00 ....._ ______ ..___ _____ __._ ______ _,_ ______ ..___ _____ __._ ______ .....J..... 887 .60 0.00 0 .~ 1.00 1 .~ 2 .00 2 .~ 3.00 -Tota i Q -CulvA -culvB -user Discharge (cfs ) -WeirA -WeirB -We irC -WeirD Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® C ivil 30® 2018 by Autodesk, Inc . v2018 .3 Hyd. No.3 Post Developed Release Hydrograph type Storm frequency Time interval Inflow hyd . No. Reservoir name Storage Indication method used . = Reservoir = 10 yrs = 1 min = 2 -Post Developed Basin #1 = Dry Detention Pond Peak discharge Time to peak Hyd. volume Max. Elevation Max . Storage Post Developed Release 1 Tuesday, 12 I 17 I 2019 = 0.027 cfs = 0.17 hrs = 1,171 cuft = 888.75 ft = 1,175 cuft Q (cfs) Hyd . No . 3 --10 Year Q (cfs) 4 .00 -,---r------r---.---r-----,----,---r-----,----,---r-----,----,-4.00 3 .00 ------!-----+---+---!-----+---+---!-----+---+---!-----+---+-3 .00 2.00 ------~--+---+---~--+---+---~--+---+---~--+---+ 2 .00 1.00 -----t----+---+---t----+---+---t----+---+---t------+--+ 1.00 0 .00 .._ _ _... __ .._ _____ =~~~~~~~~==========:.----......l----'---"---...1.--~ 0 .00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 -HydNo.3 -HydNo.2 11111111 Total storage used= 1,175 cuft Time (hrs) Hydrograph Report Hydrafiow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 30® 2018 by Autodesk, Inc . v2018 .3 Hyd. No.3 Post Developed Release Hydrograph type Storm frequency Time interval Inflow hyd. No . Reservoir name Storage Ind icat ion method used . = Reservoir = 100 yrs = 1 min = 2 -Post Developed Basin #1 = Dry Detention Pond Peak discharge Time to peak Hyd . volume Max. Elevation Max. Storage Post Developed Release 3 Tuesday , 12 I 17 I 2019 = 0.030 cfs = 0.17 hrs = 1,630 cuft = 889.03 ft = 1,633 cuft 0 (cfs) Hyd . No . 3 --100 Year 0 (cfs) 6.00 .------,------.-----.------.-----r-----.---.----,----~ 6.00 5.00 -+------+----+----1-------t----+----+---+----+----+ 5 .00 4 .00 -+------+----+----1-------t----+----+---+----+----+ 4 .00 3.00 --------+----+----f-------+----+-----+----+-----+----+-3.00 2 .00 ....-----+----+----t-----t----+-----t----+----t----t-2 .00 1.00 -------+----+----1-------t----+----+---+----+----+ 1.00 0.00 __. ___________ .... _______ _,_ ____ ~.... __ .... __ --~, ___ .J_ 0 .00 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 -HydNo.3 -HydNo.2 II I I I I II Total storage used = 1,633 cuft Time (hrs) Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civ il 30® 2018 by Autodesk, Inc. v2018.3 Hyd. No.1 BMP Hydrograph Hydrograph type Storm frequency Time interval Drainage area Basin Slope Tc method Total precip . Storm duration Q (cfs) 1.00 0 .90 0 .80 0 .70 0 .60 0 .50 0.40 0.30 0 .20 0 .10 0.00 0 .0 3 .0 -Hyd No .1 = SCS Runoff = 1 yrs = 3 min = 0.682 ac = 0.0% = User = 1.00 in = 24 hrs 6 .0 Peak discharge Time to peak Hyd. volume Curve number Hydraulic length Time of cone. (Tc) Distribution Shape factor BMP Hydrograph Hyd . No. 1 --1 Year 9 .0 12 .0 15.0 1 Wednesday, 12 I 11 I 2019 = 0.815 cfs = 11.95 hrs = 2,014 cuft = 98.8 = Oft = 5.00 min = Type II = 484 Q (cfs) 1.00 0 .90 0 .80 0 .70 0 .60 0 .50 0.40 0 .30 0 .20 0 .10 0 .00 18 .0 21 .0 Time (hrs) Soil Map-Hamilton County, Indiana Mop Seal!: 1:1,080 fpma:l on A lardscape (11" X 8.5") ~ ~----~.5?=====~~~------------~~?=============~~~ o~----~~~====~,oo~----------~zo~============~xo~ f'approjEction: Y.I!I:>M=ltcr Comer<IXll<fna<e;: Y.GS84 Ed;letic:s : liTM Zone 16NY.GS84 Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperat ive Soil Survey 12/12/2019 Pag e 1 of 3 39"' S5'57"N PSS'Sl'N Soil Map-Hamilton County, Indiana MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) D Area of Interest (AOI) Soils =:J Soil Map Unit Polygons So il Map Unit lines D So il Map Unit Po ints Special Point Features ~ Blowout l8l BorrowPft X Clay Spot 0 Clo sed Dep ress ion X Gra vel Pit .. Gravelly Spot Landfill A. l ava Flow .w. Marsh or swamp * Mine or Quarry @ Miscellaneous V\later 0 Perenn ial Water v Rock Outcrop + Sa line Spot Sandy Spot ""'' Se verely Eroded Spo t ¢· Sinkhole ~ Slide or Slip II Sadie Spot USDA Natural Resources :iiiiili Conservation Service E; Spo il Are a (J Stony Spot ro Very Stony Spot '{;· Wet Spot 1::. Other Special line Features Water Features Streams and Cana ls Transportation H-f Ra ils -Interstate Highways -US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography Web Soil Survey Nat ional Cooperative Soil Survey MAP INFORMATION The soil surveys that comprise your AOI w ere m apped at 1:15 ,800. Warning : So il Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargem ent of maps beyond the sca le of mapping can cause mi sunderstanding of the de tail of m apping and accuracy of soil line placement. Th e m aps do not show the small are as of contrasting soils th at could hav e been shown at a more detailed scale. Ple ase rely on th e bar sca le on ea ch map sheet for map measurements . Source of Map : Natural Re sources Con se rvation Service Web Soil Su rvey URL: Coordinate System : Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soi l Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection , which preserves dir ection and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection , should be used ~more accurate calculati ons of distance or area are required. Th is product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certif ied data as of the vers ion date(s) listed below. Soil Surv ey Area : Hammon County, Ind iana Survey Area Data: Version 20, Sep 16, 2019 Soil map un it s are labeled (as sp ace allows) f or map scales 1 :50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial im age s were photographed : Aug 1, 201 8-Sep 30, 2018 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines w ere compil ed and digitized probably differs from the background im agery displa yed on th ese maps. As a r es ult , some m inor shiftin g of map unit boundari es may b e evident. 12/12/2019 Page 2 of 3 Soil Map-Hamilton County, Indiana Map Unit Legend I I Map Unit Symbol UbaA UcfA I Totals for Area of Interest USDA Natural Resources ~jjjj Conservation Service Map Unit Name I Acres in AOI Urban land-Brookston complex , 0 to 2 percent slopes Urban land-Crosby silt loam complex , fine-loamy subsoil , 0 to 2 percent slopes Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 3/ Percent of AOI 0 .7 4.5 5.2 I I 13 .1% 86.9% 1oo.o% 1 12/12/2019 Page 3 of 3 National Flood Hazard· layer FtRMette t.FEMA '•l.:r •• -USGS The National M;;r@: Feet 1 :6,000 0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Legend SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT 1 SPECIAL FLOOD) HAZARD AREAS I OTHER AREAS OF FLOOD HAZARD "',. Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE) Zono A. V. A9S With BFE or Depth Zone AE. AO, AH. VE. All Regulatory Floodway 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas of 1% annual chance flood with average cfepth less tl\an one foot or witl\ cfrainage areas of less than one square mile Zone x Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Zone x Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee. See Notes. Zone x Area with Flood Risk due to Levee zone o §SCREEN! Area of Minimal Flood Hazard Zone x c::=::J Effective LOMRs OTHER AREAS I Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard zone! GENERAL~----Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer STRUCTURES 11 I II I I Levee, Dike, or Floodwall Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance Water Surface Elevation @---Coastal Transect -m-Base Flood Elevation Line(BFE) ~ = Limit of Study M ---= Jurisdiction Boundary ------Coastal Transect Baseline OTHER 1---Profile Baseline FEATURES ___ Hydrographic Feature D Digital Data Available N + No Digital Data Available MAP PANELS Unmapped The pin displayed on the map is an approximate point selected by the user and does not represen an authoritative property location. This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of digital flood maps if It is not void as described below. The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap accuracy standards The flood hazard information is derived directly from the authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This map wasexported-c:m-12/16/2019 at 3:26:24 PM and-does-ne~ reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and time. The NFHL and effective information may change or become superseded by new data over time. This map image is void if the one or more of the following map elements do not appear: basemap imagery, liood zone labels, legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers, FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images for unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for regulatory purposes.