HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings of Fact2
CARMEL ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
(Petitioner to fitt out 1-g + first two blanks)
Docket No.
Petitioner:
,tf["":ffiffi1;f[[Jg:"nce will not be injurious to the pubric hearth, safety, morars and senerarwerfare of
This is a personal home - sim ply wanting a deck and roof
Iff",:Xi5ilJrXlrfft"ff":'."f"::,rXfint to the propertv incruded in the variance wir not be arrected in a
both neighbors are ok with thi s, it will not obstruct either of their views
;',?:tl::Till:1',"#:l.ty;j:il:""*e Unined Deveropment to the property wirr resurt in practicar dirricurties
No difficulties
DECtStoN
Adopted this day of 20
3
il?"Iil5^EFoRE the decision of the carm-elBo3rd, of Zoning Appears that Deveropment standards Variance*n"n"*"'5ff:J:"j'""Ti"jljo,anVconditionsstatedintireminutesottnis_goard]
HEARING OF FICER, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals
SECRETAR Y, CarmelBoard of Zon ing Appeals
conditions of approvar of the Board, if any, are tisted on the Letter of Grant
Page 11 of 12 Filename: Hearing officer Development standards variance Apprication & rnstructi ons 2021 Revised 1/2/20