HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondenceTBM#1 = 856.00E MAIN STREETLOT 1LOT 48PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION18,240 SFT.FINISH FLOOR ELEV. = 851.55 (EAST)FINISH FLOOR ELEV. = 852.89 (WEST)FIRE LANE NO PARKINGFIRE LANE NO PARKINGFIRE LANE NO PAR
K
I
N
GSANSANSANFFE: 851.55FFE: 852.89FFE: 851.55FFE: 851.55FFE: 851.55SEE ENLARGEMENT 1ON SHEET G3.3SEE ENLARGEMENT 2ON SHEET G3.3SEE ENLARGEMENT 3ON SHEET G3.3ST-202RIM = 851.41ST-204RIM = 850.69ST-206RIM = 850.51ST-201RIM = 851.41ST-209RIM = 849.82ST-208RIM = 850.60ST-207RIM = 850.52ST-203RIM = 850.42ST-205RIM = 850.23852.20TC 851.88BC 851.38TC 852.08BC 851.58TC 852.12BC 851.62TC 851.53BC 851.03MEG 850.97MEG 850.71MEG 850.61MEG 851.03MEG 850.58MEG 850.73MEG 851.58MEG 851.36MEG 851.22MEG 851.66MEG 851.19MEG 851.32TC 852.08BC 851.58TC 851.79BC 851.29TC 851.42BC 850.92TC 851.42BC 850.92TC 851.63BC 851.13TC 851.42BC 850.92TC 851.30BC 850.80TC 851.43BC 850.93TC 851.35BC 850.85TC 851.17BC 850.67852.15851.86851.50851.50851.50851.70851.50851.37851.50851.43MEG 851.60MEG 852.09MEG 851.03TC 851.86BC 851.36852.43852.89MEG 852.29BC 851.26BC 851.31BC 851.46BC 851.51MEG 850.68MEG 850.52MEG 850.52BC 850.34BC 850.61BC 850.54BC 850.40BC 850.12BC 849.53BC 849.16MEG 850.51BC 850.06BC 850.06MEG 850.86MEG 851.11MEG 850.80MEG 850.44MEG 849.98MEG 849.66BC 850.79851.43TC 851.29BC 850.79TC 851.33BC 850.83TC 851.42BC 850.92TC 851.47BC 850.97TC 851.42BC 850.92TC 851.42BC 850.92851.43851.50851.50851.55851.50851.50851.55TC 851.12BC 850.62MEG 850.58BC 850.40MEG 850.99MEG 850.21MEG 849.20MEG 849.70MEG 850.12851.40851.45851.45851.35851.20850.30850.70851.32851.37851.53TC 851.41BC 850.91BC 850.65TC 850.65MEG 850.67MEG 850.66MEG 851.41MEG 851.40MEG 851.60MEG 851.59MEG 851.31MEG 853.80MEG 853.81MEG 853.43MEG 851.08MEG 850.92MEG 850.43BC 850.85MEG 851.37MEG 851.43MEG 851.01MEG 851.07MEG 850.99MEG 850.85MEG 850.80MEG 850.30BC 850.15MEG 850.92MEG 850.29MEG 851.25CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP.)CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP.)CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP.)111111112222BENCHMARKS:206002040INLETS, VALVES, AND MARKS MADE UPON THE GROUND BYALSO BE OTHER EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES FOR WHICH THERE IS NO ABOVE GROUND EVIDENCE OR FOREXACT LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIESSHALL BE VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO ANY AND WHICH NO ABOVE GROUND EVIDENCE WAS OBSERVED. THE OTHERS) AND ARE SPECULATIVE IN NATURE. THERE MAYALL CONSTRUCTION.THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIESEVIDENCE (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, MANHOLES,SHOWN ON THE PLAN ARE BASED UPON ABOVE GROUNDCAUTION !!Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRCall 811 or 1-800-382-5544 Before You Begin Any Digging Project.Call 48 hours or 2 working days before you dig.It's Fast, It's Easy and It's the Law in the state of Indiana! 1.SEE DRAWING GD0.1 FOR GENERAL NOTES AND ADDITIONALLEGEND.2.TOPOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWNWERE PROVIDED BY THE SURVEYOR. THE ENGINEER MAKES NOGUARANTEES THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWNCOMPRISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER INSERVICE OR ABANDONED.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THEPROJECT AREA INCLUDING UNDERGROUND UTILITYCONDITIONS, LOCATION AND DEPTH PRIOR TO ANY OTHER SITECONSTRUCTION. REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THEENGINEER.4.NO EARTH DISTURBING ACTIVITY MAY COMMENCE WITHOUT ANAPPROVED STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT.5.UTILITY RELOCATIONS REQUIRED BY THE PROJECT SHALL BETHE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER. UTILITY LINERELOCATIONS REQUIRED FOR ROAD PROJECTS THAT RESULTIN A CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE THEDEVELOPERS RESPONSIBILITY TO RESOLVE WITH THE UTILITY.EXISTING POLE LINES REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED TO WITHINONE FOOT OF PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE.6.DAMAGE TO THE EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALLRESTORED/REPAIRED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY ATTHE COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR ISENCOURAGED TO INSPECT THE RIGHT-OF-WAY WITH THE CITYPRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION TO DOCUMENT THEEXISTING CONDITION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.7.SEE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR BENCHMARK INFORMATION.GENERAL NOTESCARMEL TAC REVIEW01/13/2021A19700317No.COPYRIGHT 2021 BY FANNING/HOWEY ASSOCIATES, INC.WWW.FHAI.COMARCHITECTPROJECT NUMBER: 220114.00CARMEL HIGHSCHOOLPERFORMINGARTS ADDITIONANDRENOVATIONSCARMEL CLAY SCHOOLS520 E MAIN STREETCARMEL, IN 46032PROJECT ISSUE DATE: 03/08/2021DRAWN BY: HHW317-848-0966350 E NEW YORK ST# 300, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204REV.NO.DESCRIPTIONDATECONSULTANTCONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTSG2.3GRADING PLANGRADING PLAN LEGENDEXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONMATCH EXISTING GRADETOP OF CURBBOTTOM OF CURBEXISTING CONTOUR W/ ELEVATIONPROPOSED CONTOUR W/ ELEVATIONPROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONPROPOSED CURB ELEVATIONPROPOSED SURFACE DRAINAGE FLOW ARROWFLOOD ROUTING PATHMEGTCBCTCBC750.65PROPOSED DRAINAGE SUMMARYPROJECT AREA10 YEAR RUNOFF100 YEAR RUNOFF0.98 ACRES4.61 CFS6.88 CFS100 YEAR INLET CASTING CAPACITY ELEVATION TABLESTRUCTURENUMBER100 YEAR ELEVATION(INLET 50% CLOGGED)203R-3010NEENAH INLETCASTING TYPE850.42TOP OF CASTINGELEVATION850.65205R-3010850.23850.43ALL OF THE 100 YEAR ELEVATIONS SHOWN IN THIS TABLE AREBELOW THE ADJACENT TOP OF CURB ELEVATIONS ANDBELOW THE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION.ADDITIONAL DETENTION WAS PROVIDED BY THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTEDCARMEL HIGH SCHOOL PARKING LOT PROJECT (PZ-2020-00170 TAC). ANADDITIONAL 0.12 ACRES OF IMPERVIOUS AREA WAS ADDED TO THEPREVIOUSLY APPROVED HYDROCAD MODEL TO ACCOUNT FOR THIS ANDOTHER FUTURE UPCOMING PROJECTS. THIS PROJECT IS ADDING 0.08 ACRES.INDICATES APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF 100 YEARELEVATION OF INLET 50% CLOGGED GRADING KEYNOTES1.FLOOD ROUTING PATH FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THEPROJECT WHEN 100 YEAR FLOOD IS EXCEEDED. PATH TRAVELS FROM MAINSTREET RIGHT OF WAY ONTO THE PROJECT SITE THEN TRAVELS IN A EASTERLYDIRECTION OVER TWO EXISTING INLETS THAT WILL REMAIN IN PLACE THENCONTINUES EASTERLY TO WEST SIDE OF EXISTING DRIVE ENTRANCE THENTRAVELS SOUTH AND THEN WEST TO A EXISTING CURB INLET LOCATED ON THENORTH SIDE OF MAIN STREET.2.FLOOD ROUTING PATH FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE EAST SIDE OF THEPROJECT WHEN 100 YEAR FLOOD IS EXCEEDED. PATH TRAVELS FROM THE EASTSIDE DRIVE AND THEN TRAVELS IN A NORTHERLY DIRECTION OVER MULTIPLEEXISTING CURB INLETS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE DRIVE.EVENTUALLY GRADE LEVELS OUT ON THE EAST DRIVE NEAR THE NORTHEASTCORNER OF THE HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING AND IF PONDING DEPTH EXCEEDS SIXINCHES FLOOD ROUTING PATH WILL OVERTOP CURB AND TRAVEL EAST TO AEXISTING SWALE AND THEN TRAVEL NORTH IN THE SWALE TO COOL CREEK.100 YEAR INLET CASTING CAPACITY ELEVATION TABLESTRUCTURENUMBER100 YEAR ELEVATION(INLET CLOGGED)203R-3010NEENAH INLETCASTING TYPE850.42TOP OF CASTINGELEVATION205R-3010850.23INDICATES APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF 100 YEARELEVATION OF INLET 100% CLOGGED100%851.03850.61B TAC RESPONSE 06/08/2021MLAG = 853.03' , MFPG = 852.03'
TBM#1 = 856.00E MAIN STREETLOT 1LOT 48PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION18,240 SFT.FINISH FLOOR ELEV. = 851.55 (EAST)FINISH FLOOR ELEV. = 852.89 (WEST)FIRE LANE NO PARKINGFIRE LANE NO PARKINGFIRE LANE NO PAR
K
I
N
GSANSANSANFFE: 851.55FFE: 852.89FFE: 851.55FFE: 851.55FFE: 851.55SEE ENLARGEMENT 1ON SHEET G3.3SEE ENLARGEMENT 2ON SHEET G3.3SEE ENLARGEMENT 3ON SHEET G3.3ST-202RIM = 851.41ST-204RIM = 850.69ST-206RIM = 850.51ST-201RIM = 851.41ST-209RIM = 849.82ST-208RIM = 850.60ST-207RIM = 850.52ST-203RIM = 850.42ST-205RIM = 850.23852.20TC 851.88BC 851.38TC 852.08BC 851.58TC 852.12BC 851.62TC 851.53BC 851.03MEG 850.97MEG 850.71MEG 850.61MEG 851.03MEG 850.58MEG 850.73MEG 851.58MEG 851.36MEG 851.22MEG 851.66MEG 851.19MEG 851.32TC 852.08BC 851.58TC 851.79BC 851.29TC 851.42BC 850.92TC 851.42BC 850.92TC 851.63BC 851.13TC 851.42BC 850.92TC 851.30BC 850.80TC 851.43BC 850.93TC 851.35BC 850.85TC 851.17BC 850.67852.15851.86851.50851.50851.50851.70851.50851.37851.50851.43MEG 851.60MEG 852.09MEG 851.03TC 851.86BC 851.36852.43852.89MEG 852.29BC 851.26BC 851.31BC 851.46BC 851.51MEG 850.68MEG 850.52MEG 850.52BC 850.34BC 850.61BC 850.54BC 850.40BC 850.12BC 849.53BC 849.16MEG 850.51BC 850.06BC 850.06MEG 850.86MEG 851.11MEG 850.80MEG 850.44MEG 849.98MEG 849.66BC 850.79851.43TC 851.29BC 850.79TC 851.33BC 850.83TC 851.42BC 850.92TC 851.47BC 850.97TC 851.42BC 850.92TC 851.42BC 850.92851.43851.50851.50851.55851.50851.50851.55TC 851.12BC 850.62MEG 850.58BC 850.40MEG 850.99MEG 850.21MEG 849.20MEG 849.70MEG 850.12851.40851.45851.45851.35851.20850.30850.70851.32851.37851.53TC 851.41BC 850.91BC 850.65TC 850.65MEG 850.67MEG 850.66MEG 851.41MEG 851.40MEG 851.60MEG 851.59MEG 851.31MEG 853.80MEG 853.81MEG 853.43MEG 851.08MEG 850.92MEG 850.43BC 850.85MEG 851.37MEG 851.43MEG 851.01MEG 851.07MEG 850.99MEG 850.85MEG 850.80MEG 850.30BC 850.15MEG 850.92MEG 850.29MEG 851.25CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP.)CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP.)CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP.)111111112222BENCHMARKS:206002040INLETS, VALVES, AND MARKS MADE UPON THE GROUND BYALSO BE OTHER EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES FOR WHICH THERE IS NO ABOVE GROUND EVIDENCE OR FOREXACT LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIESSHALL BE VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO ANY AND WHICH NO ABOVE GROUND EVIDENCE WAS OBSERVED. THE OTHERS) AND ARE SPECULATIVE IN NATURE. THERE MAYALL CONSTRUCTION.THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIESEVIDENCE (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, MANHOLES,SHOWN ON THE PLAN ARE BASED UPON ABOVE GROUNDCAUTION !!Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRCall 811 or 1-800-382-5544 Before You Begin Any Digging Project.Call 48 hours or 2 working days before you dig.It's Fast, It's Easy and It's the Law in the state of Indiana! 1.SEE DRAWING GD0.1 FOR GENERAL NOTES AND ADDITIONALLEGEND.2.TOPOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWNWERE PROVIDED BY THE SURVEYOR. THE ENGINEER MAKES NOGUARANTEES THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWNCOMPRISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER INSERVICE OR ABANDONED.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THEPROJECT AREA INCLUDING UNDERGROUND UTILITYCONDITIONS, LOCATION AND DEPTH PRIOR TO ANY OTHER SITECONSTRUCTION. REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THEENGINEER.4.NO EARTH DISTURBING ACTIVITY MAY COMMENCE WITHOUT ANAPPROVED STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT.5.UTILITY RELOCATIONS REQUIRED BY THE PROJECT SHALL BETHE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER. UTILITY LINERELOCATIONS REQUIRED FOR ROAD PROJECTS THAT RESULTIN A CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE THEDEVELOPERS RESPONSIBILITY TO RESOLVE WITH THE UTILITY.EXISTING POLE LINES REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED TO WITHINONE FOOT OF PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE.6.DAMAGE TO THE EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALLRESTORED/REPAIRED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY ATTHE COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR ISENCOURAGED TO INSPECT THE RIGHT-OF-WAY WITH THE CITYPRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION TO DOCUMENT THEEXISTING CONDITION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.7.SEE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR BENCHMARK INFORMATION.GENERAL NOTESCARMEL TAC REVIEW01/13/2021A19700317No.COPYRIGHT 2021 BY FANNING/HOWEY ASSOCIATES, INC.WWW.FHAI.COMARCHITECTPROJECT NUMBER: 220114.00CARMEL HIGHSCHOOLPERFORMINGARTS ADDITIONANDRENOVATIONSCARMEL CLAY SCHOOLS520 E MAIN STREETCARMEL, IN 46032PROJECT ISSUE DATE: 03/08/2021DRAWN BY: HHW317-848-0966350 E NEW YORK ST# 300, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204REV.NO.DESCRIPTIONDATECONSULTANTCONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTSG2.3GRADING PLANGRADING PLAN LEGENDEXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONMATCH EXISTING GRADETOP OF CURBBOTTOM OF CURBEXISTING CONTOUR W/ ELEVATIONPROPOSED CONTOUR W/ ELEVATIONPROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONPROPOSED CURB ELEVATIONPROPOSED SURFACE DRAINAGE FLOW ARROWFLOOD ROUTING PATHMEGTCBCTCBC750.65PROPOSED DRAINAGE SUMMARYPROJECT AREA10 YEAR RUNOFF100 YEAR RUNOFF0.98 ACRES4.61 CFS6.88 CFS100 YEAR INLET CASTING CAPACITY ELEVATION TABLESTRUCTURENUMBER100 YEAR ELEVATION(INLET 50% CLOGGED)203R-3010NEENAH INLETCASTING TYPE850.42TOP OF CASTINGELEVATION850.65205R-3010850.23850.43ALL OF THE 100 YEAR ELEVATIONS SHOWN IN THIS TABLE AREBELOW THE ADJACENT TOP OF CURB ELEVATIONS ANDBELOW THE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION.ADDITIONAL DETENTION WAS PROVIDED BY THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTEDCARMEL HIGH SCHOOL PARKING LOT PROJECT (PZ-2020-00170 TAC). ANADDITIONAL 0.12 ACRES OF IMPERVIOUS AREA WAS ADDED TO THEPREVIOUSLY APPROVED HYDROCAD MODEL TO ACCOUNT FOR THIS ANDOTHER FUTURE UPCOMING PROJECTS. THIS PROJECT IS ADDING 0.08 ACRES.INDICATES APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF 100 YEARELEVATION OF INLET 50% CLOGGED GRADING KEYNOTES1.FLOOD ROUTING PATH FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THEPROJECT WHEN 100 YEAR FLOOD IS EXCEEDED. PATH TRAVELS FROM MAINSTREET RIGHT OF WAY ONTO THE PROJECT SITE THEN TRAVELS IN A EASTERLYDIRECTION OVER TWO EXISTING INLETS THAT WILL REMAIN IN PLACE THENCONTINUES EASTERLY TO WEST SIDE OF EXISTING DRIVE ENTRANCE THENTRAVELS SOUTH AND THEN WEST TO A EXISTING CURB INLET LOCATED ON THENORTH SIDE OF MAIN STREET.2.FLOOD ROUTING PATH FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE EAST SIDE OF THEPROJECT WHEN 100 YEAR FLOOD IS EXCEEDED. PATH TRAVELS FROM THE EASTSIDE DRIVE AND THEN TRAVELS IN A NORTHERLY DIRECTION OVER MULTIPLEEXISTING CURB INLETS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE DRIVE.EVENTUALLY GRADE LEVELS OUT ON THE EAST DRIVE NEAR THE NORTHEASTCORNER OF THE HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING AND IF PONDING DEPTH EXCEEDS SIXINCHES FLOOD ROUTING PATH WILL OVERTOP CURB AND TRAVEL EAST TO AEXISTING SWALE AND THEN TRAVEL NORTH IN THE SWALE TO COOL CREEK.100 YEAR INLET CASTING CAPACITY ELEVATION TABLESTRUCTURENUMBER100 YEAR ELEVATION(INLET CLOGGED)203R-3010NEENAH INLETCASTING TYPE850.42TOP OF CASTINGELEVATION205R-3010850.23INDICATES APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF 100 YEARELEVATION OF INLET 100% CLOGGED100%851.03850.61DRAFT FOR CARMEL REVIEW June 3, 2021
From:Pete Rankovich
To:Jordan, Alex; Conn, Angelina V
Cc:Jacob Bower; Chuck Tyler; Cheryl Sydzyik; Herb Windhorst
Subject:Carmel HS Perfrorming Arts PZ-2021-00006
Date:Wednesday, May 26, 2021 3:14:37 PM
Attachments:C010.08_G3.3.EP.pdf
C010.05_G1.3.SP.pdf
**** This is an EXTERNAL email. Please exercise caution and Do Not open attachments
or click links from unknown senders or unexpected email. ****
Hi Alex,
We uploaded the two attached drawings in response to the last correspondence we had.
On the “Changemark Viewer” comments list the following items still show up as “Unresolved”;
· Item 9 : By Vectren. Comment states “I have no comments on the addition.” This should be
closed.
· Item 15: By Alex Jordan. Comments states all FFEs must be below adjacent roadway. The
existing and new building is over 1’ higher than the internal drives, but not above Main
Street (existing). This is an Existing Condition. I will send out a Letter for a Waiver Request.
· Item 19: By Alex Jordan. Comments states that the Frontage needs to be revised. We have
the proposed Conceptual Plans in for pricing to the Contractor as suggested by John Thomas
and David Littlejohn to be incorporated into the Roundabout Project Plans.
· Item 20: By Alex Jordan. Comments states that ADA ramp curbs need to be adjusted. We
have modified this and uploaded on 5-10-2021 and again on 5-25-2021. (Sheets G1.3 and
G3.3) See attached.
· Item 24: By Alex Jordan. Comments states that sidewalk closure is required. If item 19 and
20 above are not in the scope of work. Then there is no work in the ROW.
· Item 34: By David Littlejohn. Comments states that the Frontage needs to be revised. We
have the proposed Conceptual Plans in for pricing to the Contractor as suggested by John
Thomas and David Littlejohn to be incorporated into the Roundabout Project Plans.
· Item 36: By Alex Jordan. Comments states to List BMPs in O&M Manual. This was done and
uploaded on 5-10-2021
· Item 37: By Alex Jordan. Comments states to more clearly label BMP on Plans. On the Site
Utility Plan SU1.3 Keynote 13 and the Structure Table. Uploaded on 4-19-2021.
On the “Workflow Checklist” comments list the following items still show up as “Not Met”;
· Item 11 : By Alex Jordan. Comments states to show elevations if all inlets were 100%
blocked. This was indicated on the plans and uploaded on 4-19-2021 Sheet G2.3.
· Item 12: By Alex Jordan. Comments states to show MLAG elevations based on a 100-yr
storm elevation. Since the adjacent drive is lower than the building the flows would go east
and then north down the drive and/or south to Main Street. This was uploaded on 4-19-
2021 Sheet G2.3
Also Under Applicant Resubmit
· Under Capt Ellison (CFD) status states ”CFD Conditions remain the same.” Captain Ellison
indicated in my telephone conversation with him that he had no further requirements, or
than the east drive/road remaining open to the FDC and Fire Hydrant.
Please call me at 317-506-6298 to discuss why these items are still not resolved. Were the drawings
not uploaded correctly, or if there is additional information still missing?
Best Regards,
Pete M. Rankovich
_____________________________________________________________________________
Pete M. Rankovich, P.E. | TLF
3901 W. 86th Street Suite 200 | Indianapolis, IN 46268 | Office: (317) 334-1500 Ext. | Direct Dial: (317) 224-0423
Mobile: (317) 506-6298 | Fax: (317) 334-1552 | *: prankovich@tlf-engineers.com | www.TLF-Engineers.com
CITY OF CARMEL
STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) REQUIREMENTS
SWPPP for Construction Sites:
1. 14 Digit Watershed Hydrologic Unit Code
2. Name of all receiving waters
If the discharge is to a municipal separate storm sewer, identify the ultimate receiving water
3. Estimate of peak discharge for post construction conditions (10-year)
4. Locations of specific points where stormwater discharge will leave the site.
5. Locations where stormwater may be directly discharged into groundwater, such as abandoned
wells or sinkholes
6. Soils map of the predominant soil types including:
a. Soil legend with descriptions of each soil type
b. Brief description of how the site has accommodated the existing soil limitations
7. Description of potential pollutant sources associated with the construction activities
8. Temporary and permanent stormwater quality measures:
a. Location
b. Dimensions
c. Detailed specifications
d. Construction details
e. Monitoring and maintenance guidelines
9. General construction sequence
Each plan should contain multiple stormwater pollution prevention measures. All measures will not be
installed at the same time. Various measures will be installed at different times throughout the
construction process. Some will be installed prior to land disturbance, and others may not be installed
until work at the site progresses to an area where they are necessary. Each proposed measure should be
identified in the sequence as to when it is to be installed in relation to the land disturbing activities.
10. Location of proposed soil stockpiles, borrow, and/or disposal areas
These areas shall be included as part of the plans whether they occur on or off site.
11. Temporary and Permanent surface stabilization methods appropriate for each season
Provide application rates for soil amendments and seed mixtures, as well as, the type and application rate
for mulch.
12. Erosion and sediment control specifications for individual building lots
13. Material handling, storage, and spill prevention plan
a. List of expected materials that may be present on the site during construction operations
b. Written description of how these materials will be handled to minimize the potential of entering
the storm sewer system
c. Procedures for the contractor to take if any spills occur during construction.
14. Contact information for the trained individual responsible for stormwater pollution prevention for
the project site
a. Name
b. Address
c. Telephone number
d. E-mail address
e. List of qualifications
15. Current revision date on all sheets
Revised 3/5/07
CITY OF CARMEL
STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) REQUIREMENTS
SWPPP for Post-Construction:
1. Description of potential pollutant sources associated with the proposed land use.
2. Post-construction stormwater quality measures:
a. Location
b. Dimensions
c. Sizing calculations
d. Detailed specifications
e. Construction details
3. Sequence describing stormwater quality measure implementation
Description of when the proposed post construction stormwater quality measures will be installed in
relation to the general construction sequence.
4. Stormwater quality measures to be implemented to prevent or minimize adverse impacts to stream
and riparian habitats
5. An operation and maintenance manual for all post-construction stormwater quality measures:
a. A brief description of what a water quality BMP is and does.
b. Contact information for the BMP owner
i. Name
ii. Address
iii. Telephone number
iv. E-mail address
c. A statement that the BMP owner is responsible for all maintenance and costs associated with the
BMPs
d. A right-of-entry statement allowing the City of Carmel to inspect and maintain the BMP as
necessary
e. A description of each BMP
f. Specific actions to be taken regarding routine maintenance, remedial maintenance, and
sediment/pollutant removal:
i. Sediment/pollutant removal procedures should be explained in both narrative and
graphical forms.
ii. Guidance on routine maintenance, such as mowing, litter removal, woody growth
removal, etc.
iii. Guidance on remedial maintenance, such as inlet replacement, outlet work, etc.
iv. A tabular schedule should be provided listing all maintenance activities and dates for
performing the these required activities
v. Who will actually be charged with maintaining the BMPs (maintenance staff, waste
disposal company, etc.)
g. Site drawings showing:
i. Locations of the BMPs
ii. Locations of the access easements to maintain the BMPs
iii. Locations of the points of discharge for stormwater treated by the BMPs
iv. Cross sections of BMP features
h. Requirements regarding the submittal of annual inspection reports to the City of Carmel
Engineering Department. The first report is due one year after construction is completed, with
subsequent reports due each year within the same month of the initial report. If there are any
deficiencies found during the inspection, these should be addressed. If the inspection report is
not received within the month it is due, if there are deficiencies which were not included in the
report, or if any deficiencies included in the report are not addressed in a timely manner, the
BMP owner faces enforcement action from the City.
Revised 3/5/07