Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRenaissance 07100184_86�11pi°F U 11 Y v r CARMEL N c0 °1titi1`l DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES Division of Planning & Zoning LETTER of GRANT August 29, 2006 Paul Reis Bose McKinney & Evans LLP 600 E. 96`h Street Suite 500 Indianapolis, IN 46240 Re: Renaissance Hotel — 06070014-06070018 V Dear Mr. Reis: At the meeting held Monday, August 28, 2006, the Carmel Advisory Board of Zoning Appeals took the following action regarding the Developmental Standards Variances (V) filed by you for the property located just west of the intersection of 1224 St. and Pennsylvania St. APPROVED: Docket Nos. 06070014, 06070015 & 06070018 V Development Standards Variances for reduced number of parking spaces, total number of signs and signs to be oriented north/south. APPROVED: Docket No. 06070016 with the Condition that each Renaissance wall sign would be no larger than five (5') feet by forty-seven feet and three and seven -eighths inches (47'- 3 7/8") and the ground sign would be no taller than six (6) feet, including the base, and conform with the Carmel Sign Ordinance. WITHDRAWN: Docket No. 06070017 V. Please be advised that per Section 30.05.05: Time Limit of the Zoning Ordinance, the aforementioned Development Standards Variance approvals are valid for one (1) year. By that time, either continuous construction of the improvements must be underway, or a written request for a one-time, six-month extension of the approvals must have been received and approval granted by this Department. The expiration date of the approval is August 28, 2007. Please be advised that per Section 25.07.07: Sign Permits of the Zoning Ordinance, the signs approved pursuant to the aforementioned Development Standards Variances must be established within one (1) year. The expiration date of the approvals is August 28, 2007. When applying for applications for permits regarding the improvements contained within this approval, please include a copy of this letter with your application materials in order to assist the Department's review. If I can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 317/571-2417. Sincerely, Angelina Conn Planning & Zoning Administrator Department of Community Services cc: David Littlejohn, sign permits ✓ ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317-571-2417 VI r Item 1 of 3 rhxivill KL"1.r1Yl vri+uzi i` COPY # 1 Sec: Twp:18 Rng:3 Sub: B1k:35 Lot: PARCEL ID ........: 1709350000015000 DATE ISSUED.......: 10/31/2007 RECEIPT #......... 26686 REFERENCE ID # ...: 07100184 SITE ADDRESS PENNSYLVANIA ST SUBDIVISION CITY. .. CARMEL IMPACT AREA ....... OWNER . ADDRESS CITY/STATE/ZIP ...: , RECEIVED FROM ....: A SIGN BY DESIGN CONTRACTOR LIC # COMPANY ........... ADDRESS ....... CITY/STATE/ZIP ...: TELEPHONE ......... FEE ID UNIT QUANTITY AMOUNT PD-TO-DT THIS REC NEW BAL SIGNINSTAL SQUARE FEET _ 23.30 107.51 0.00 107.51 0.00 SIGNPERM FLAT RATE 1.00 83.00 0.00 ^ 83.00 0.00 TOTAL PERMIT 190.51 0.00 190.51 0.00 0 SIGN COPY DATE NAME OF SIGN ADDRESS SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION OCT 2 r PERMIT NUMBER: 0 l 1 CC) r g,f PHONE: ADDRESS: CITY: CARMEL STATE: IN. ZIP: 46039 1 ROPF,RTY OWNER-1^��ErP��EE���19r?N i'1IO1wF � _ •- ADDRESS: 4243 HUNT ROAD CITY: CINCINNATI " STATE: 'OE —ZIP: 45242 ZONING DISTRICT: OVERLAY ZONE: 31 �_ 421 431 OLD TOWN: YES _NO aL 07 I S +! 'A#�l REQUIRED APPROVALS: Plan Commission Docket # ws t; 1q- V BZA Docket # IS AN IMPROVEMENT LOCATION PERMIT REQUIRED FOR THIS BUILDINGII'ENANT SPACE? IF YES, STATE PERMIT NUMBER ISSUED SIGN TYPE -circle one: WALL GROUND ROOF PROJECTING SUSPENDED PORCH WINDOW DOGS Only OTHER NO. OF SIDES c2 SIGN STATUS -circle appropriate response( . NEW EXISTING PERMANENT TEMPORARY OVERALL SIGN HEIGHT FROM GROUND: FT. OVERALL SIGN DIMENSIONS: r FT. x _ (V O FT. TOTAL SIGN AREA: Requested . _SQ.FT. Permissible SQ.FT. COLORS: RED, WHITE L BUILDING OR TENANT SPACE FRONTAGE DIMENSION: ✓Q FT. BUILDING TYPE:,STAaIIr! f SETBACK OF SIGN FROM NEAREST RIGHT-OF-WAY:. FT. LOGO DIMENSIONS: LOGO IS PERCENT OF SIGN AREA ARE THERE ANY EXISTING SIGNS ON THIS SITE? IF YES, EXPLAIN NO SHOPPING CENTER OR COMPLEX NAME: 1'1 CERTIFY THAT A PICTURE OF THIS SIGN WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES WITHIN ONE (1) WEEK AFTER ERECTION OF THE SIGN. -OR- I WOULD PREFER A $104.00 INSPECTION FEE BE ADDED TO THE COST OF THIS PERMIT TO COVER THE COST OF THE STAFF OF THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES TAKING THIS PICTURE. TWO COPIES OF THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTATION ARE REQUIRED FOR THE REVIEW OF THIS SIGN PERMIT: * COMPLETED APPLICATION * SITE PLAN (depicting all dimensions, setbacks and proposed sign location) * SIGN ELEVATIONS (depicting all dimensions, copy and color) * BUILDING OR TENANT SPACE ELEVATION (depicting frontage dimensions and proposed sign location) * LANDSCAPE PLAN: Required for ground signs (depicting the planting, mature heights and caliper) * See Samples Attached SIGN PERMIT FEES: -PERMIT APPLICATION ........................... $83.00 -SIGN ERECTION .....:................................. $33.25 PER SIGN FACE PLUS $1.76 PER SQUARE FOOT -REPLACEMENT OF SIGN FACE IN AN EXISTING CABINET--$33.25 PLUS $1.76 PER SQUARE FOOT (Continued On Page 2) i1 -01- 6r, -00-00 - 0(s- 00 Page 2 of 2 Carmel/Clay Sign Permit Application THE UNDERSIGNED CERTIFIES THAT THE FOREGOING SIGNATURES, STATEMENTS AND ANSWERS HEREIN CONTAINED AND THE INFORMATION HEREWITH SUBMITTED ARE IN ALL RESPECTS TRUE AND CORRECT, AND THIS SIGN WILL BE ERECTED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, AND THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF CARMEL/CLAY TOWNSHIP, INDIANA AND ALL ACTS AMENDATORY THERETO, AND SHALL BE ERECTED WITHIN SIX (6) MONTHS OF THE DATE OF ISSUANCE OR THIS PERMIT IS NULL AND VOID. FURTHER, THE UNDERSIGNFD CERTIFIED BY SIGNING THIS APPLICATION THAT ALL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE DEPARTMENT Or COMMUNITY SERVICES ARE ADVISORY_ . PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE BUSINESS OWNER'S SIGNATURE PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME (PLEASE PRINT) BUSINESS OWNER'S NAME (PLEASE PRINT) SIGN COMPANY: A,0,igaby Desi_qn_ Jor CONTACT PERSON: Don Miller PHONE:317-876-790(1 ADDRESS: P Box 691 CITY: Zionsville STATE: IN ZIP: 46077 THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE CONCERNS BY STAFF OR PRIOR COMMITMENTS THAT MUST BE ADHERED TO AS A CONDITION OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT (PLEASE INITIAL EACH ITEM INDIVIDUALLY): SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION SIGN ERECTION - Improvement Permit INSPECTION FEE (Required if photography not provided) TOTAL FEE $ $ -7,J 4 1.-7 j $104.00 OR oto will be provided $ 1 10 PERMIT ISSUED BY: FEE RECEIVED BY: RELEASED STAMP: PAID STAMP: 0 c _ REC'D OCT 2 9 2007 By Letter of Authorization Permit Acquisition Property owner: Wineirdrdner & Hammons Inc. on behalf of the Carmel Hotel LL.0 Address: 4243 Hunt Road Cincinnati, OH 45242, give my authorization for " Sign by Design", the sign installer, to act in my behave to acquire the sign permits and install signage as needed for the "Renaissance Hotel" located at 11925 N. Meridian St., Carmel IN 46032(Permit #07030052 I hereby acknowledge the foregoing in full and certify that this is a true and accurate statement. Signature: t State of: Ohio )� County of: Hamilton Subscribed and sworn before me this Vt4 day of , 200� Notary Public Signature: DANA L. OURKHAMM€R My Commission Expires: Mat"i p� , WO a Orpw CIL) 1 CITY OF CARMEL Item 2 of 3 PERMIT RECEIPT Sec: Twp:18 Rng:3 Sub: B1k:35 Lot: PARCEL ID ........: 1709350000015000 DATE ISSUED.......: 10/31/2007 RECEIPT #......... 26686 REFERENCE ID # ...: 07100185 SITE ADDRESS PENNSYLVANIA ST SUBDIVISION ....... CITY .... CARMEL IMPACT AREA ....... OWNER ............ ADDRESS ........... CITY/STATE/ZIP ...: , RECEIVED FROM ....: A SIGN BY DESIGN CONTRACTOR LIC # COMPANY ........... ADDRESS .......... CITY/STATE/ZIP ..,: , TELEPHONE ........ fll& OPERATOR: rboone COPY # : 1 FEE ID UNIT QUANTITY AMOUNT PD-TO-DT THIS REC _ NEW BAL YYY SIGNINSTAL SQUARE FEET ^v 237.00 450.37 0.00 450.37 0.00 SIGNPERM FLAT RATE 1.00 83.00 0.00 83.00 0.00 TOTAL PERMIT 533.37 0.00 533.37 0.00 1 � ' T V r SIGN ADDRESS 11925 . MERIDIAN STREET SIGN COPY RENAISSA �G�• —' `- ��� N C TY QP CARME'LICLAY TOWNSIIIP. HAMILTON COUNTY. INDIANA y �= SIGN PERMIT A-PLILICATION DATE RECEIVED:, -- k NAME OF BUSINE, ADDRESS: PR6PFRTY O' 1v­KnR PERMIT NUMBER: PHONE: CITY: STATE: IN. ZIP: a6n�? PHONE:• ADDRESS: 4243 HUNT ROAD CIT QINCINNATI STATE: OHZIP: aF;9a? ZONING DISTRICT: OVERLAY ZONE: 31 X 421 431 OLD TOWN: YES _ NO Qk'+ 0if4.Tj2a5 oi-al 4v,a'V D��—?�1�U REQUIRED APPROVALS: an Commission ticket # n [c, n � rc 611. V BZA Docket # DOCS Only IS AN IMPROVEMENT LOCATION PERMIT REQUIRED FOR THIS BUILDING/TENANT SPACE? IF YES, STATE PERMIT NUMBER ISSUED SIGN TYPE -circle one: CWDL GROUND ROOF PROJECTING SUSPENDED PORCH WINDOW OTHER NO. OF SIDES SIGN STATUS -circle appropriate responses :NEW EXISTINGPERMANENT TEMPORARY r 3719 d OVERALL SIGN HEIGHT FROM GROUND: �} .3 ' FT. OVERALL SIGN DIMENSIONS: o_FT. x 97 — FT. TOTAL SIGN AREA: Requested 3 i SQ.FT. Permissible BUILDING OR TENANT SPACE FRONTAGE DIMENSION: c a SQ.FT. COLORS: RED, WHITE BUILDING TYPE: 51 1"Yi i 5�-p/1 SETBACK OF SIGN FROM NEAREST RIGHT-OF-WAY: r 1, g LOGO DIMENSIONS: ! `� A , LOGO IS T� PERCENT OF SIGN AREA ARE THERE ANY EXISTING SIGNS ON THIS SITE? IF YES, EXPLAIN NO SHOPPING CENTER OR COMPLEX NAME: Al /14 CERTIFY THAT A PICTURE OF THIS SIGN WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES WITHIN ONE (1) WEEK AFTER ERECTION OF THE SIGN. -OR- I WOULD PREFER A $104.00 INSPECTION FEE BE ADDED TO THE COST OF THIS PERMIT TO COVER THE COST OF THE STAFF OF THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES TAKING THIS PICTURE. TWO COPIES OF THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTATION ARE REQUIRED FOR THE REVIEW OF THIS SIGN PERMIT: * COMPLETED APPLICATION * SITE PLAN (depicting all dimensions, setbacks and proposed sign location) *.. SIGN ELEVATIONS•(depicting all dimensions, copy and.color) * BUILDING OR TENANT SPACE ELEVATION (depicting frontage dimensions and proposed sign location) * LANDSCAPE PLAN: Required for ground signs (depicting the planting, mature heights and caliper) * -See Samples Attached SIGN PERMIT FEES: -PERMIT APPLICATION ........................... $83.00 -SIGN ERECTION ....................................... $33.25 PER SIGN FACE PLUS $1.76 PER SQUARE FOOT -REPLACEMENT OF SIGN FACE IN AN EXISTING CABINET--$33.25 PLUS $1.76 PER SQUARE FOOT (Continued On Page 2) Page 2 of 2 Cannel/Clay Sign Permit Application THE UNDERSIGNED CERTIFIES THAT THE FOREGOING SIGNATURES, STATEMENTS AND ANSWERS HEREIN CONTAINED AND THE INFORMATION HEREWITH SUBMITTED ARE IN ALL RESPECTS TRUE AND CORRECT, AND THIS SIGN WILL BE ERECTED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, AND THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF CARMEL/CLAY TOWNSHIP, INDIANA AND ALL ACTS AMENDATORY THERETO, AND SHALL BE ERECTED WITHIN SIX (6) MONTHS OF THE DATE OF ISSUANCE OR THIS PERMIT IS NULL AND VOID. FURTHER. THE UNDERSIGNED CERTIFIED BY -SIGNING THIS APPLICATION THAT ALL REPRESENTATIVES OF: THE, DEP�_RT?�:CIE?��TOFCOMMIrr?IT�'.SE.IZ�%1C .S ARE�A);VIS�.�tl'_ , . SARCc �w 1' s � w_-Q PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE BUSINESS OWNER'S SIGNATURE PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME (PLEASE PRINT) BUSINESS OWNER'S NAME (PLEASE PRINT) SIGN COMPANY: A Sign hVDesign. Inr.. CONTACT PERSON: Don Miller PHONE:317-876-790 ADDRESS: Box 691 CITY: Zionsville STATE: IN ZIP: 46077 THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE CONCERNS BY STAFF OR PRIOR COMMITMENTS THAT MUST BE ADHERED TO AS A CONDITION OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT (PLEASE INITIAL EACH ITEM INDIVIDUALLY): 5) x SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION $ SIGN ERECTION - Improvement Permit $ -7 S 503 7 INSPECTION FEE (Required if photography not provided) $104.00 OR P to will be provide TOTAL FEE $ r/x� PERMIT ISSUED BY FEE RECEIVED BY: RELEASED STAMP: PAID STAMP: C C T 3 1 RECD Letter ®f Authorization Permit Acgw'sl.tion Property owner: min archer & Hammons Inc. on behalf of the Carmel Motel LLC Address: 4243 Hunt Road.. Cincinnati, OR 45242, give my authorization for " Sign by Design7. the sign installer, to act in my behave to acquire the sign permits and install signage as needed for the "Renaissance Hotel" located at: 11925 N. Meridian St_ Carmel IN 46032 &PergA #07030052 I hereby acknowledge the foregoing in fall and certify that this is a true and accurate statement. Signature: f)�� State of Ob�o County of: Hamilton Subscribed and sworn before me this day of R , 20� Notary Public Signature: L . " s 0.1 k3 EMA L. E;URKti xAKAIER �tasa Pubic. state az My Commission Expires: a m �+ ` jNNp H aom� a jjjjI r � si �• � ��T�hh f i1 z AT: AT 4 O-W ` w9 v � i o rA ui LLI to ' LEI � 4 co 1 J } y J i 7 z r •` w v _ o a w . + LL3 yD W co oC rd en } J CD .L h Y U-% C7 = n 6^ LO M X O X i j +• CD Cn LD / O Z O IL { a t F W r .• r r .� U z to 7, C) r � vQ °- z z i uj In z _ � a m 7 O U Q L, 7 �wV) w U � 0 s OHO V V1 w w 0 � to wLW VI m L, V) w O�L� �� Illy C2 Ld U U w yw r dH L, s as S W�3 Z z J a w~ J N O M\ E� V C� p Z JZrn� LJ m > rn w. � CL z -z=r V7 r�)m Uri r�J F 7 a o u } Nj w u� Ira In Y Ww W JW J �N m a¢ L ¢ g O VJ r�Yd Ijjy W W z J ItJ LL Q 707 w7 C w = }iW } p Z K�7 O Wof Q 2 7 U m 3 Item 3 of 3 CITY OF CARMEL PERMIT RECEIPT Sec: Twp:18 Rng:3 Sub: B1k:35 Lot: PARCEL ID 1709350000015000 DATE ISSUED.......: 10/31/2007 RECEIPT #......... 26686 REFERENCE ID # ...: 07100186 SITE ADDRESS PENNSYLVANIA ST SUBDIVISION CITY ... CARMEL IMPACT AREA ....... OWNER . ADDRESS CITY/STATE/ZIP ...: , RECEIVED FROM A SIGN BY DESIGN CONTRACTOR LIC # COMPANY ........... ADDRESS ........... CITY/STATE/ZIP ...: , TELEPHONE ......... OPERATOR: rboone COPY # : 1 FEE ID UNIT QUANTITY AMOUNT PD-TO-DT THIS REC NEW BAL SIGNINSTAL SQUARE FEET 237.00 450.37 0.00 450.37 0.00 SIGNPERM FLAT RATE 1.00 83.00 0.00 83.00 0.00 TOTAL PERMIT 533.37 0.00 533.37 0.00 METHOD OF PAYMENT AMOUNT NUMBER CHECK 1257.25 21541 TOTAL RECEIPT �"1257.25 SIGN COPY RENAISSANCIE DATE RECEIVED: _ NAME OF BUSINESS ADDRESS: 11925 N. 1� SIGN ADDRESS 11925 N_ MFRIDIAN STREET SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION PERMIT NUMBER: 1 l uy!g PHONE: CITY: CARMFL STATE: IN. ZIP: 46032 PROPFRT.YI�1K?�IERFy e.r?cR t N/AAF�AhiS. its+C=: -. PI1ON1 :. --ADDRESS: 4243 HUNT ROAD _ CITY: CINCINNATI STATE: OH ZIP.: 45242 " ZONING DISTRICT: rOVERLAY ZONE: 31 X 421 431 OLD TOWN: YES —NO REQUIRED APPROVALS an[o�li¢ion� �cket # _nI�n � R a 1 (p v BZA Docket # DOCS Only IS AN IMPROVEMENT LOCATION PERMIT REQUIRED FOR THIS BUILDING/TENANT SPACE? IF YES, STATE PERMIT NUMBER ISSUED SIGN TYPE -circle one: WALL GROUND ROOF PROJECTING SUSPENDED PORCH WINDOW OTHER NO. OF SIDES SIGN STATUS -circle appropriate response{s :NEW EXISTING PERMANENT TEMPORARY d � 3 k9 OVERALL SIGN HEIGHT FROM GROUND: O .3 FT. OVERALL SIGN DIMENSIONS: ,AFT. x 417 � - FT. TOTAL SIGN AREA: Requested e23-7 SQ.FT.Permissible 'n SQ.FT. COLORS: RED, WHITE BUILDING OR TENANT SPACE FRONTAGE DIMENSION: 02 � a FT. BUILDING TYPE: 5 9 n &? L % M J4, 54. it, SETBACK OF SIGN FROM NEAREST RIGHT-OF-WAY: FT, LOGO DIMENSIONS: + �1 LOGO IS^ PERCENT OF SIGN AREA - ARE THERE ANY EXISTING SIGNS ON THIS SITE? IF YES, EXPLAIN NO SHOPPING CENTER OR COMPLEX NAME:. NAl CERTIFY THAT A PICTURE OF THIS SIGN WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES WITHIN ONE (1) WEEK AFTER ERECTION OF THE SIGN. -OR- I WOULD PREFER A $104.00 INSPECTION FEE BE ADDED TO THE COST OF THIS PERMIT TO COVER THE COST OF THE STAFF OF THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES TAKING THIS PICTURE. TWO COPIES OF THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTATION ARE REQUIRED FOR THE REVIEW OF THIS SIGN PERMIT: * COMPLETED APPLICATION * SITE PLAN (depicting all dimensions, setbacks and proposed sign location) * SIGN ELEVATIONS (depicting all dimensions, copy and color) * BUILDING OR TENANT SPACE ELEVATION (depicting frontage dimensions and proposed sign location) * LANDSCAPE PLAN: Required for ground signs (depicting the planting, mature heights and caliper) * See Samples Attached - SIGN PERMIT FEES: -PERMIT APPLICATION ................:.......... $83.00 -SIGN ERECTION.... .................................- $33.25 PER SIGN FACE PLUS $1.76 PER SQUARE FOOT -REPLACEMENT OF SIGN FACE IN AN EXISTING CABINET--$33.25 PLUS $1.76 PER SQUARE FOOT (Continued On Page 2) [�-Dq-•3�-cc-00-0(S. &&-o Page 2 of 2 Carmel/Clay Sign Permit Application THE UNDERSIGNED CERTIFIES THAT THE FOREGOING SIGNATURES, STATEMENTS AND ANSWERS HEREIN CONTAINED AND THE INFORMATION HEREWITH SUBMITTED ARE IN ALL RESPECTS TRUE AND CORRECT, AND THIS SIGN WILL BE ERECTED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, AND THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF CARMEL/CLAY TOWNSHIP, INDIANA AND ALL ACTS AMENDATORY THERETO, AND SHALL BE ERECTED WITHIN SIX (6) MONTHS OF THE DATE OF ISSUANCE OR THIS PERMIT IS NULL AND VOID. FURTHER THE UNDERSIGNED CERTIFIED BY SIGNING THIS APPLICATION THAT ALL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE DEPARTMENT GR CON94UNITY•SMICES ARE ADVISORY... - PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE BUSINESS OWNER'S SIGNATURE PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME (PLEASE PRINT) BUSINESS OWNER'S NAME (PLEASE PRINT) SIGN COMPANY: A SignjjyjDesijqn Inr CONTACT PERSON: Don Miller PHONE:317-87R-790 ADDRESS: P.O.Box 691 CITY: Zionsville STATE: IN ZIP: 46077 THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE CONCERNS BY STAFF OR PRIOR COMMITMENTS THAT MUST BE ADHERED TO AS A CONDITION OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT (PLEASE INITIAL EACH ITEM INDIVIDUALLY): 1) x 2) x 3) x 4) x 5) x SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION $ . i Q %, 0 SIGN ERECTION - Improvement Permit $ ✓ 5• 2 1 1 tlf� INSPECTION FEE (Required if photography not provided) $104.00 OR P i t=provided TOTAL FEE $ W" PERMIT ISSUED BY. LJt FEE RECEIVED BY: RELEASED STAMP: ? ? n O � E OCT 'G 9 2007 BY---W--- PAID STAMP: F3_TC a_C_ i LOCT r v: Lefter of Au-th rfta to Permit Acquisition Property owner: Mine ardner & Hammons Inc. on behalf of the Carmel motel. LLLC Address: 424a Hunt load, Cincinnati, OH 45242, give my authorization for " Sign by Design,,, the sign installer, to act in any behave to acquire the sign permits and install signage as needed for the "renaissance Hotel" located at: 11925 N. Meridian St., Carmel, IN 4-6032 {Perrni.t #0703 0052 1 I hereby acknowledge the foregoing in frill and certify that this is a true and accurate statement. Signature: i State of: 4bio County of. Hamilton Subscribed and sworn before me this day of , 200'. Notary Public Signature: ❑ANA L. € URKHAM11111 My Commission Expires: Notary Public. SWI 11 Qi1° ry. 2210 (\ e \k �( \10 #§ £ } 8M� }I/ S\§ 22m §7/ e \/ R\LZ L}3 g� / m§ \\\ 7 R±o= <� ur \ � 2 La < \\�2 wo ee= =-moo oaa2 \ / / �§ In LU La ƒ§ E j§ § 0. ( /\ ) $ § 2 Lq \ W i Q / LU ■ u z cd k 2 z z z g � 0 ■Z t ¢ 2 � Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals August 28, 2006 Collision Center. It will be a 20,000+ square foot building to be constructed on a street to be known as Nottingham Way that connects from 106th Street around to US 421. The development has a potential of going north to connect into what could be the future home of Wal Mart or an unknown. They have planned their connectivity with the neighbor to the north. In the ADLS process for this development and future development in this area, they were required to submit their overall sign package. A site plan and chart were shared showing the existing signs, those that would be removed and the ones subject to the variances. The ground sign at the entryway for the Performance Collision Center needs a variance because it will be the second sign on the 1061h Street elevation. There is a wall sign on the south end of the building which is 500 feet from 1061h Street. The Plan Commission has approved the appearance, color and configuration. The size of the sign meets the Ordinance. The second variance is for the sign at the Nottingham Plaza entrance off US 421 because it exceeds the height of the Ordinance which is eight (8) feet. The new sign would be ten (10) feet eight (8) inches tall. They seek a sign with changeable copy that will permit the change in the identity of tenants for the future development. The third variance relates to the Quick Lane sign which is to be located at the eastern entryway off 106th Street. This portion of the building is being converted from an existing service area/showroom area with an overhead door. The entire fagade of that side of the building is being upgraded and a Quick Lane service facility being installed. It will have a sign over the building indicating the Quick Lane location. They are asking for a second sign on this 1061h Street elevation. It will be a ground sign indicating it is the entryway for the Quick Lane. The signs have been submitted to and approved by TAC. Mr. Dierckman left the meeting. Members of the public were invited to speak in favor or opposition to the petition; no one appeared. The Public Hearing remained open. 10-14h. Renaissance Hotel The applicant seeks the following development standards variance approvals: Docket No. 06070014 V Chapter 27.08 reduced # parking spaces Docket No. 06070015 V Chapter 25.07.02-8(b) total # signs Docket No. 06070016 V Chapter 25.07.02-8(c) sign square footage Docket No. 06070017 V Chapter 25.07.02-8(d) ground sign height P'L�'�i'' Docket No. 06070018 V Chapter 25.07.02-8(b) signs oriented north/south The site is located at 11911 N. Meridian St. and is zoned 13-6/Business within the US Hwy 31 Corridor Overlay. Filed by Terry Dammeyer of Winegardner & Hammons, Inc. The Petitioner set up their display boards. Mr. Dierckman returned to the meeting. Present for the Petitioner: Paul Reis, Bose McKinney & Evans, 600 E. 96th Street, Suite 500. Also present from Winegardner & Hammons, Inc. were Keith Daub, President & COO; Terry Dammeyer, Senior Vice President Construction; Jeff Eagle, Vice President Construction; and Jeff Veigl, Project Architect. He stated that the mailing that was made to the Board was purely informational and was not in any way intended to circumvent the State Law regarding communication with the Board of Zoning Appeals. It was not intended to be a part of the record and was not filed with the Department of Community Services. Winegardner & Hammons has over 40 years of experience in the business of Page 7 of 17 Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals August 28, 2006 Members of the public were invited to speak in favor or opposition to the petition; no one appeared. The Public Hearing was closed. Mrs. Conn gave the Department Report. The Department is in favor of the variance request for the reduction in parking spaces. The Petitioner knows their product well and will be able to park the adequate number of cars on the site. The Department is also in favor of the wall sign orientation on the north and south facades. They understand Pennsylvania Street and Meridian Street are the streets for potential customers. The Department is in favor of the ground sign height and square footage. The only concern of the Department is the square footage of the wall signs. The Department Report included a graphic prepared showing the large signs in the Meridian corridor. The largest sign is Clarian North Medical Center which is twenty-five (25) letters in width and it is 198 square feet. It is that square footage because it is part of a PUD; otherwise it would probably have to be 120 square feet in area. The Department recommends negative consideration of the variance for the wall sign square footage. But if the Board does approve the variance, the Department recommends a maximum letter height of 4.47 feet to give the sign approximately 199.8 square feet. That is an approximate 45 percent reduction in square footage per sign. The Department recommends positive consideration of the other three dockets. Mr. Dierckman asked the maximum occupancy at any one point for the ballrooms, if they were all being used. Mr. Dammeyer stated it was approximately 300 for an evening wedding function. A daytime stand-up function would accommodate more than 300. Mr. Dierckman asked the maximum permitted under the life safety code and the maximum for a daytime stand-up function. Mr. Dammeyer did not know the maximum number for the life safety code. It would be in the local code. The maximum for a stand-up function was 400. Mr. Reis stated that when they do the DP/ADLS application and go through the TAC process, which goes through the Fire Department, they will probably focus in on the floor plan. It will be under Indiana State Code for maximum occupancy. Mr. Dierckman felt that would be a leading indicator for the number of cars. They had obviously done a lot of research, but wondered if the Staff had done any research on the parking from other sources. Mrs. Conn stated that the Department goes by the requirements for a full service hotel in the Parking Ordinance. Mr. Dierckman inquired about the ballroom space. Mr. Dammeyer stated that it was 7,200 square feet. The hotel customers are the business function customers. It is not outside people. It is not a catering hall with outside people coming in. Mr. Dierckman asked the square footage of the Ritz Charles and the number of parking spaces. He felt that might be a good comparison. Page 9 of 17 Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals August 28, 2006 Mr. Dammeyer stated that if the 150 square feet criteria are used, it would be a 4-foot high sign. If a 5- foot sign is used, which is slightly higher than recommended by the Department, it is 236 square feet. It goes back to the visibility and readability from the highway and how it looks on the elevation. Mr. Hawkins stated that the scale looks good, but it is a huge sign. He knew it was so traffic could see it before 1161h Street or 1261h Street. However, if someone misses it, they can simply turn at the next road. It is not as if they would get shut off for miles. Mr. Dammeyer agreed. It is appropriately sized. The sign is two percent of the gross area of the elevation. The Hilton sign is five percent of its elevation. The Hilton Garden Inn is on the small side of its building and the Renaissance sign is on the large side of its building. The Hilton sign, as listed in the packet, is seven feet total height and twenty-four feet in length. It is a stacked sign. Mr. Daub stated that the 6-foot sign would be the smallest sign they have ever put on one of these buildings. In the past, their signs have either been seven or eight feet because they need awareness. They came prepared to compromise with a five-foot sign, although they would like it to be six feet. This compromise looks equally good and would satisfy their need for having a very prominent hotel with a very visible sign that would allow them to get the awareness they need in the community. Mr. Dammeyer added that the five-foot sign would be 47 feet plus some inches long and would be 237 square feet. It fits the building nicely, although they have a bias for the six-foot sign. It would still allow a nice prominent presence as people drive up and down the US 31 corridor. Mr. Daub stated that the problem they had with the Ordinance was that it did not dictate the maximum height of the letters, but the total square footage of the sign. They are at a disadvantage because of the number of letters in the name of the hotel. If it were a Marriott or a one -letter name, the sign could be significantly larger, because of the number of letters. Mr. Dammeyer stated that the Westin sign at the same height would only be 186 square feet. It would be one foot less than the "M" in the Meijer grocery store. They have studied every sign in the community and tried to come properly prepared. Mr. Hawkins asked who the customer would be since they need signs for awareness, but do not need parking. Mr. Daub stated that not all of the different kinds of customers they attract to the facility are at the hotel at the same time. Today a 263-room hotel is a large hotel. It is a significant investment and it has gotten more difficult to fill the hotel because of the proliferation of growth of the limited hotels that take a much smaller financial investment. Their hotel has been impacted by those types of facilities, so they need to attract the business customer who works downtown and lives in this community. They need to have them bring their business out into this community, typically for a daytime business meeting. The hotel sleeping rooms are vacant, so there is plenty of parking. Most hotels have low occupancy on Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays, so they do not have a full hotel and a full ballroom with a social function going on. If they were not satisfying the customer with parking, they would not be presenting this proposal. As a Marriott, this hotel prototype has finished consistently in the top 25 percent for their brand. They had a hotel finish #1 in their brand in customer satisfaction in two separate years. They currently have three hotels in the top 10 in their system. They are the exact Page 11 of 17 Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals August 28, 2006 Mr. Dammeyer stated that is their busiest month. Mr. Reis had questioned the number of parking spaces. The Petitioner has a good handle on their functions and because customer service is so important, they would not book functions to the extent that they felt they would not have adequate parking. There could be a commitment that the hotel would book functions so there are an adequate number of parking spaces. Mr. Molitor stated there had been a desire from some of the Board members to get information about some other properties. They could take a 15-minute recess to allow the Department to pull some of the numbers together this evening instead of continuing it for another month. The Board voted unanimously to table the Public Hearing of this Petition while the Department gathered some information. While the Department was gathering the information, the meeting continued under New Business to discuss the changes to the Rules of Procedure. Mrs. Plavchak left the meeting at this time (7:50 PM). Old Business There'tas. no Old Business. J. New BN Mr. Molitor stated th the change came up as the result of the Cingul Cell Tower proposal because of the agreement to let i -it it it) until the October 23 meeting. hen they looked at the Rules of Procedure, they found they ere not firm as to whether the Bo could demand a Petitioner to make a new Public Notice if they are it off for three months. They ere concerned about Petitioners having the ability to sandbag remonstrat by coming in and the , at the last minute, asking the Board to continue the Petition until the next anth. That would ear down the remonstrators if the Petitioner continued to do that. They felt it shou >�e tightene p to allow one tabling under certain circumstances. But if they went beyond t t, the and would need to suspend the Rules unless they offered to provide new Public Notice. In the ' gular case, they have agreed to provide the new Public Notice. This would apply to future situation, he Petitioner is tabling an item for more than two months, they agree to give new Notice; u ss the an convince the Board they have a hardship situation. Then the Board could suspe the Rules. erally the rule would be that they would get one tabling, and then they would ne to provide new P is Notice every time. If there were only three Board members present or e Board decided at its o discretion that it wants to continue a Petition for reasons related to e contents of the hearing, then could be tabled. Mr. Hawkins asked if -it pfecluded the Board from tabling a Petition. Mr. Molitor state at if the Board decided to table a Petition, then it is su cient for the Board to announce the F lic Hearing is going to be continued until the next month. T Petitioner does not have to 21 additional Notice when the Board continues a Petition. The Board ould have complete Page 13 of 17 Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals August 28, 2006 discretion to continue a Petition. If the Petitioner wishes to continue, they need to odfy the Staff not les than five days in advance. That precludes the Petitioner from coming in to a meeting, seeing the numb of remonstrators, and then asking to table. Mrs. Torr\tab to what items this would apply? Mr. Molitit would become effective immediately, but would of apply to items that have already bd. It would only affect any new Petitions. Mr. Broach would b\ner vor of letting the Petitioner hav two tablings without additional Notice. Not every Pbig corporation. There are i tviduals with various petitions and it costs money to re-ne cases, the Board could v e to suspend the Rules. Mr. Dierckman agrhose were the ones that e Board could vote to suspend the Rules. Mr. Molitor stated that it could be anted to read ' o tablings" unless they agree to provide new Notices. That still precludes them fro Voie e meeting and asking to be tabled after they see the room full of remonstrators. Mr. Broach asked if they come in the dting and ask to table would they then need to re - notice? Mr. Molitor stated they could request th/tabling, bt\the Board would need to grant it. Mr. Hawkins felt the changes were f e and if there was , hardship, the Board could suspend the Rules. That would prevent someo from trying to gauge t remonstrance and then continuing it to an inconvenient time for the remons ators. Mr. Molitor was not saying one had abused it. But they did lookinto it after the Cingular Petition. Some of the neighbors felt t ey should get additional Notice and the oard went ahead and said they would like Cingular to giv additional Notice. When they looked at the ales, they did not feel it was firm in the Rules to requ' e Cingular to re -notice. Mr. Broach moved to pprove the Amendment to the Rules as drafted by the a orney. The motion was seconded by Mr. Di ckman and APPROVED 4-0. The recess contir/jed until the Staff returned. Mr. Dierckm moved to reconvene the Public Hearing. The motion was seconded by Hawkins and APPR D 4-0. The Public Hearing for 10-14h. Renaissance Hotel resumed. Mrs. Conn gave information the Departmen •had researched. Mr. Hollibaugh was also printing out some information for The Ritz Charles and The Fountains. The ground sign for the hotels south of this location is 7 feet 6 inches tall. The sign is stacked and is for both hotels. The sign for Jameson Inn is 4 feet 7 inches tall for the ground sign iathe US 31 corridor. The Meijer sign is 10 feet tall by 25 feet in width and the building width is 600 feet. Page 14 of 17 Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals August 28, 2006 Mr. Reis stated that it was protected because certain companies do have protected rights with regard to color. Mr. Dierckman asked if they had the ability to negotiate with regard to the hotness of the sign when it is burning. Mr. Dammeyer stated that it was an internally lit sign, either LED or neon tube sign. It would not be a bright sign. Mrs. Conn stated with other signs in the corridor there is an option for day/night plex. In the daylight it is one color and at night with the perforations, it shines through white. Mr. Dammeyer stated it is a color lens and the lighting behind it is white, so it comes through as the burgundy color. Mr. Reis stated the color of the sign will be discussed with the ADLS application at Plan Commission. The intensity of the light is the purview of the Plan Commission, but he did not feel they could change the color. Mr. Dierckman stated that Mrs. Plavchak said before she left that the Clarian sign is actually too small for the building and he agreed with her. Mr. Dammeyer stated the Clarian sign is 3 feet 5 inches by 58 inches for the one sign and the second sign is the same height with fewer letters. Mr. Hawkins was comfortable if the ground sign was limited to 6 feet and the sign square footage on the building, which -they were really talking height of letters, was going to be 5 feet in height. Mrs. Torres wanted to confirm that the 6-foot ground sign would include any base. Mr. Dammeyer confirmed the size of both signs. Mr. Dierckman moved to approve Docket No. 06070014 V, reduced number of parking spaces. The motion was seconded by Mr. Broach and APPROVED 4-0. Mr. Dierckman moved to approve Docket No. 06070015 V, total number of signs. The motion was seconded by Mr. Broach and APPROVED 4-0. Mr. Broach moved to approve Docket No. 06070016 V, sign square footage, with the Condition that the letters be limited to 5 feet in height by 47 feet for a total square footage of 237 square feet. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hawkins Mr. Reis asked Mr. Broach to also state for the record that the ground sign will be at the permitted 6 feet, because the ground sign area was also mentioned in the variance. Mr. Broach amended his motion as stated by the Petitioner. The motion was APPROVED 3-1, with Mr. Dierckman casting the negative vote. Page 16 of 17 Date O �1?�°G DOCKET NO. APPLICATION for AOLS ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN LIGHTING and SIGNAGE FEE: $802.00 (Plus $107.00 per acre when � NOT accompanied by a Development Plan) Name of Project: E & 1. >r A C�" /�nTE L AEsT o f 'T rFE' i NTER.S a C T►v N OF I e Z N P STRd5e'T ¢ Address: 7 c9 4 N S L Y �/A ►� +'4 r Type of Project: Fiji. �Ji'R ►C6r ❑Te L �•"rF�F�E''IG i`�'2 Applicant: �/ t 9 Y`,WwT -T^4e Phone No. 513' 714 - Z 4i/ 4 �h'rF'lE� Phone No. 5► 3- iyy- ZNI� Contact Person: �EQ� Y �Ar Fax No. 413 - ?5L} - Z5,q q Email: Address: 42'a IHU.,o t Fg,.AD Get 140, y ti 1 Legal Description: To be typewritten on a separate sheet Area (in acres) 9Zonin g Owner of Real Estate: asF4+�►�r7�'�I RTt�+�1riL r4► 7�s kTr" -C, L ► f/s� z"�SuR�^� Carmel: 1 Clay Township: Annexation: Y or N Other Approvals Needed: Zot,41 r4 RTL I ANCES PARKING No. of Spaces Provided: 400 No. Spaces Required: DESIGN INFORMATION Type of Building: HaTE�' L No. of Buildings O�EL� Square Footage: 1 �4 (99 1 Height: VAPeto No. of Stories $ F,,gis► V NerAL Exterior Materials: 'Bit Ioc.'CrM5,5 Colors: 7o W 1V6r6-,z! , -465 D Maximum No. of Tenants: Q*' Type of Uses:_Ey1-5ERJ146' 90T6-e- Water by: dtVT 1L Pa'PrSewer by: 04 fC51�i+ ►o4,A4L �.,lpsTCs >IS"'T17 t e-T' Z.sharedVormslPC applicatioMadlsapp.doc 1/4/2006 �11 0 Type of Fixture: No. of Fixtures: LIGHTING 70 -b&� 5,, ►J&4' Tier P Height of Fixture: Additional Lighting: * Plans to be submitted showing foot candle spread at property lines, per Ordinance. SIGNAGE No. of Signs: �► Z ty Type of Signs: 7 r�t.s. iHo gtH �z Craoijkj A Locat--,cur 'g r 3&a sjFS lcGF4r�tO r l.-T t a 6mam S,4,jG.�xGo"l -� r �-C D 5 F Dimensions of each sign: &Awt $,re PiTAIr 6Rd1 ►a►D S► Ib H ifg W = i+61tT H 4ea _ 5 ► <r.4 = 3Gz sF r'i4cri Square Footage of each sign: A�4sT 5jne s 0> SF " '' ++ ' q" AFF Total Height of each sign: 14n T4 'r SaaTA � h4t. 51 ¢u S ►,5 a 3 - i�i��` LANDSCAPING * Plans to be submitted showing plant types, sizes, and locations *********************************************** I, the undersigned, to the best of my knowledge and belief, submit the above information as true and correct. �1z. V.s72ycrly� Signature of Applicant Title D+vm (Pri t) Date ************************************** State of4ndiena, SS: County of�����--� Before me the undersigned, a Notary Public for AA �'� �� county, State of Indiana, personally appeared D A kW E`i C2 and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument this -DU-"' day of " L , 20 D In My Commission Expires: q _ Z (- � vU� Notary lic Z:shared\formslPC app-pp.,," 1/4/2006 JEAN D. YACCHARI Notary Public. Stale Of ON* My Commisslori &Om April 21. 2009 of- f'IfffQq�` CITY OF J-� fy CARMEL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES f� I'� wlllll��y Division of Planning & Zoning LETTER of GRANT October 26, 2006 Terry Dammeyer W & H Realty, Inc. 4243 Hunt Road Cincinnati OH 45242 RE: Docket No. 06080014 DP/ADLS Renaissance Hotel Dear Mr. Dammeyer: The Carmel Plan Commission took the following action at its meeting October 17, 2006 regarding the Development Plan and Architectural Design, Lighting, Landscaping and Signage (DP/ADLS) for the Renaissance Hotel located at 11911 North Meridian Street, Carmel, within the US 31 Corridor Overlay. APPROVED: Docket No. 06080014 DP/ADLS, Renaissance Hotel. The Commission voted 7 in favor, two opposed, none abstaining, thereby granting the petition. In order to assist the Department's review, please attach a copy of this letter when making application for permits regarding the improvements contained within this approval. Do not hesitate to contact me if I can be of further assistance. S. ely, y Matt L. Griffin Planning Administrator Department of Community Services 317-571-2417 cc: Sarah Lillard cc: David Littlejohn cc: file it hA 06080014 DP/ADLS Renaissance Hotel ' 1 ifs s a -d Page 1 of 1 RENAISSANCE GROUND SIGN PLAN N GROUND SIGNAGE DATA (1) LOCAT IC1M Mal). CAST E,ti'I RY QRIVE AT INTFRFiCC-KJN Of `22ND S[REE'f A'4D PENNSYL'•/ANIA':Tf .ET �15' I'' - 7-5 1 /2" -r � I W-B 1 2- v �i[1F FRCNI GROUND SIGN ELEVATIONS GROUND SIGN S v'ALE. W-Tl i A[]L UU I %.itLt AREA OF SIGN: SIGN DESCRIP .0N: INTEMALLY ILLQNIMAT=D CC ILIE510ED 1 X '," TAt I MON%ItTNT ..4R:}UND SIGN SIGN FAC= TO Be RCUTP-U ALUMItillA? WITH VII, 12121 DURGUNDY COLOR PUSH THROUGI-I VI NYL LE-TERS VTL 1212' HURGVWoy MLOR LOGO BACKGROUNC VON 1 121; Cl[Y.L COLOR SILVaK L(YuC AND LOGO BORDER PAINTED NULTHE,4-- MAP•7.925 CREAM VXOR ALUMINUM FACE MeN SIDES iO BE ALUMINUM FI LLER'WITH PAINTED MATH'-'iG xh1R 02116 SURGUND'Y COLOR SIGN INTERNAL ILLUMINA I ION COOL WN ITE FLOURSCENT SIGN VCL£ CLOVER AND RASCTO BE ALUM;NUiA WITH P/i7NTEDMA7hkti-'9 YNIN•Ii+:ld1 iwkRVOREY COLOR SION LAN: WING ? SIGN Ate. 7061 ING VARIANCE ia-MMS I hU ' • lL, 7. ^ �'h41upb[is Ct [llslscss. sn � . ` �' +tnnsvrnaac http://cocdocs.ci.carmel.in.uslweblinkllmageDisplay.aspx?cache=yes&sessionkey=WLI... 10/ 12/2007 SOUTH ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION RENAISSANCE WALL SIGNAGE DATA LOCATION: NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS AREA OF SIGN = 237 S.F. SIGN DESCRIPTION: INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED CHANNEL LETTER SIGN SIGN FACE TO BE ACRYLIC WITH VDN 12519 BURGUNDY COLOR LETTER PAINTED MATHEWS #MP-02116 BURGUNDY COLOR 1' JEWELITE PERIMETER TRIM CAP SIGN SIDES TO BE ALUMINUM FILLER WITH PAINTED MATHEWS #MP-02116 BURGUNDY COLOR SIGN INTERNAL ILLUMINATION NEON TUBE 15MM: WHITE DESIGNER 65M ZONING VARIANCE REQUESTED • DATE: ��r..J nMF10. MA NO SECON / :. PROVIDE STING OF Q- J PRIMARY I I 'ER DETAIL I B MD E 36LLM GRADE.I} j I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ------------- -------- -------- --- -- —R I #3 8 PL2 � PL3 I------------- --- — PL3 Sld&op�io-��--o---o - \`\ INV. 24° \ 84E a 2 RP-Rl #1 10 I �Sl I I / r — j j I HLP—Rl #16© I _ / RP—R1 #2&4 I --�� APPROX. LOCATION OF TELECOM 10 2 j R 1 SERVICES STUB —UP. VERIFY EXACT I LOCATION WITH ARCH/OWNER 1 FL1 PRIOR TO ROUGH —IN 4 I FL1 I REFER TO 122n ( PROPOSED i Ft 1 owCT 3—TYPE IFY COMMERCIAL BUILDING ���� WITH ARCH./o NER PL2 PRIOR TO RO GH-IN PAD = 856.3 TIELZ NEW RP-R1 #3 F.F. = 857.0 10 I -- ---- — -- ------- — I I 4 I 2 I 1 I I I I I S1 PAD MOUNTED I I 1 I S1 PL3� TRANSFORMER, METER ¢ 6 8 9 I I I AND CONCRETE PAD( I G$ I GB �n I ISTRIBUTION SWITCHBOARD 'DS1 w 1 c° I I, I c ELECTRIC ROOM 164 O9 HLP—R1 13 dS1 I I MN G 1 — I HLP—R1 #14 O I I 1 CZ 1 2 I I --0- — -------�---- S2 S2 S; I S2 D--- —-4------ — --- I i St s1 RP—R1#3610 PROPOSED HOTEL I I ELECTRIC ROOM 158 (LOCATION PAD = 855.9 OF PANELS HLP—R1, RP—R1 AND F.F. = 856.6 EXTERIOR LIGHTING CONTROLS) HLP—R1 #17O I S2 I I S2 S2 S2 S2 S2 S I s2 I � 1 I I , ,I I cl II I " 1 1 S I �l Fs II I III II II Hf� INV. 12" $51.36 i 1 1 UN WE 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1