Loading...
Woodacre Park S22.83CARMEL PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 20, 1982 Page 2 r H. Old Business ' lh. Commission to consider Docket No. 1-82 Z, Rezone Application for Spring Mill Properties, 55 acres on S.E. corner of 131st and Spring Mill Rd., from S-2 to R-3. Sent to Land Use Committee and Tech- nical Advisory Committee for review and report. Filed by Al Oak for Spring Mill Properties. Al Oak and George Sweet were present. Mrs. McTrlullen gave the Land Use Committee report (which is a part of the official minutes and attached to the master copy). The committee recommend- ed approval subject to the 3 conditions brought forth by the Technical Advis- ory Committee as stated in the subcommittee report and Mrs. McMullen so moved. Seconded by Mrs. Badger. Paper ballots were requested by Mrs. Litvan. The vote was unanimous for approval. 2h. Commission to consider Docket No. 2-82 Z, Rezone Application for Spring Mill Properties, 17 acres located on south side of 131st St. between Spring Mill Rd. and U.S. 31 from S-2 to B-5. Sent to Land Use Committee and Technical Advisory Committee for review and report. Filed by Ai Oak for Spring; Mill Properties. Al Oak and 'George Sweet were present. :,'Irs. PQc tz.11en `ave the Land Use Committee repent (which is a part of the official minutes and attached to the master copy). The committee recommend- ed approval subject to the conditions listed in the subcommittee report a.r.d Mrs. r:':cMllullen so moved. Seconded b,: r.Irs. Badger. Paper ballots were requested by mrs. Litvan. The vote was 9 For, 1 Against (Mrs. Litvan voting No). Motion carried. 311. Commission to consider Docket No. 3-82 Z, Rezone Application for Dr, John Barbour, 6.906 acres located on north side of 116th St. between Keystone Ave. and Jefferson Dr. from R-4 to B-7. Sent to Land Use Committee and Technical Advisory Committee for review and report. Filed by Dudley Senefeld for Dr. John Barbour. ]enefel_d wD.s present. iFrs. P,c"`sullen ave the Land Use Committee report (which is a part of the official minutes and attached to the master copy). The committee recommend- ed approval subject -to the stipulations stated in the subcommittee report and Mrs. Mclullen so moved. Seconded by Mors. Badger. Paper ballots were requested by Pdrs. Litvan. The vote was unanimous for the rezoning approval. 4h. Commission to consider Docket No. 4-82 P, Preliminary Plat Appli- cation for Woodacre Park, a residential cluster subdivision of 30 lots on 6.01 acres, located on north side of W. Main St. between Thornhurst and Inngate in R-1 zoning. Requires variance from Sub- division Ordinance Sec. 6.3.6, 7.1.3 and 7.1.4. Sent to Subdivision Committee and Technical Advisory Committee for review and report. Filed by Doug Floyd for Hughey Construction. 5h. Commission to consider Final Plat Application for Woodacre Park, a residential cluster subdivision of 30 lots on 6.01 acres, located on north side of W. Main St. between Thornhurst and Inngate in R-1 zon- ing. !till require variance from Subdivision Ordinance, Sec. 6.3.6, _H_U_GHEY, INC., HUGHEY CONSTRUCTION CO., CARMEL CONCRETE PRODUCTS CO. INVOICE NUMBER I INVOICE DATE DESCRIPTION GROSS �2/25/83 Woodaare Sign Print 61.00 CHECK NO. 15942 Prescribed by State Board of Accounts TOTALS 61.00 CITY OF CARMEL RECEIPT BUILDING COMMISSIONERS OFFICE r:. �. FUND CARMEL, IND... - - r `� _19 RECEIVED FROM THE SUM OF ON ACCOUNT OF DISCOUNT NET 61.00 61.00 A.E. BOYCE CO.. MUNCIE. IND. GENERAL FORM NO. 3:2 N° 14781 HUGHEY, INC. SIGN PERMIT S 22-83 WOODACRE PARK West Main & Woodacre Drive —. -- 6— nun—. IMP. —N=MAL FORM NO. 352 CITY OF CARMEL RECEIPT BUILDING COMMISSIONERS OFFICE n� FUND I CARMEL, IND.. RECEIVED FROM cJ THE SUM OF ON ACCOUNT OF N° 14781 r DOLLARS 100 j TO BUILDING COMMISSIONER HUGHEY, INC.. HUGHEY CONSTRICTION CO.. CARMEL CONCRETE PRODUCTS CO. INVOICE NUMBER INVOICE PATE DESCRIPTION GROSS 12/25/83 Woodacre Sign Prmt 61.00 :HECK NO 15942 TOTALS 61.00 HUG =, INC. SIGN PERMIT S 22-83 WOODACRE PARK West Main & Woodacre Drive DISCOUNT NET 61.00 61.00 CARMEL PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 20, 1982 page 31 0 1 7.1.3.and 7.1.4, Sent to Subdivision Committee and Technical Advisory Committee for review and report. , ,Filed by Doug Floyd for Hughey Construction. Mr. Floyd and Mr. Hughey were present. Both items 4h and 5h were considered together. Mrs. Lang gave the Subdivision Committee report (which is a part of the official minutes a -Ad attached to the master copy). The committee recommelid- ed approval subject to the stipulations stated in the committee report and Mrs. Long so moved. Seconded by Mr. Ellis. The covenants were submitted and cover everything except the parking situation. Mrs. Badger questioned the solution of the drainage problem. Mr. Floyd said that it has been solved and he explained further. Mr. Kiphart stated that his office is satisfied with the drainage solution. Mr. Stan Neil, of Weihe Engineering, explained the detention area.and showed the drainage plan. Dr. Freeman questioned the engineering solution. Mr. Gundersen asked if the detention area would have any water in it. Mr. Neil said perhaps only for a few hours, but that it would not re- main for a long time. Mr. Gundersen stated concern for overcrowding in this area. Mr. Floyd stated that the zoning here allows 6 units per acre and they will have only 5. The buildings will be 10 ft• apart. lit^. Gundersen said they are talking about row houses. Nir. Floyd said they do not consider them to be row houses. The street will be a public street. Mr. Kiphart spoke of the mailbox proposal. The plans show an area for people to pull over to get the mail. The sign is to be incorporated in the mailbox cluster. Mr. Merrill stated that he is opposed to clustering the mail boxes. The post office said not to put the mail boxes on the buildings because they will not deliver the mail there. Mr. Merrill said he feels the Plan Commission should invite a member of the post office to explain its position on this. Mr. Kiphart said he would contact the post office and see if the mail boxes can be put on the buildings for the mail or on the grassy strip. Mr. Gundersen requested paper ballots. Mrs. Litvan moved that there be only one motion for Preliminary and Final Plats and for the 3 variances. Seconded by Mr. Story. Motion carried. The vote was 7 For, 3 Against (Mr. Davis, Mr. Gundersen and Mrs. Badger voting NO). Motion carried. 6h. Commission to consider Docket No. 5-82 P, Preliminary Plat Appli- cation for Winterwood (Shadow Ridge) Subdivision, 40 lots on 81.50 acres located on W. 106th St. between Spring Mill Rd. and Estancia Way in S-1 zoning. Sent to Subdivision Committee and Technical Advisory Committee for review and report. Filed by Chris'White for R:J. Klein & Assoc. Mr. White was present. Mr. Gundersen chaired this petition. Mr. Merrill abstained from this item due to conflict of interest. Dr. song gave the Subdivision Committee report (which is a part'of the official minutes and attached to the master copy). The committee recommended Subdivision Subcommittee - Carmel Plan Commission April 13, 1982 Docket # 4-82P Woodacre Park Committee members present: Clyde Riley, Sandra Long, Fred Ellis Also in attendance - Terry Litvan, Bill Merrill, Kurt Woerner Petitioners Al Hughey, Mike Hughey, Jim O'Bara & Doug Floyd Public: David L. Smith, Atty. for neighbors (Baker, Orbison, Bales & Knowles); Jane Wallace, Dottie Genatone, Joan Denney and D. E. Powers. This is for both single and final plats of a 30 lot, cluster home development in RTl zoning on 6.01 acres that will feature 15 two- family dwellings with the units attached by the garages. The pro- ject is located on Main Street between the Iron Gate Apts. and Thornhurst subdivision. It will feature a common open area of 3/4 acre with a parklike setting at the northern end of the complex. Accel and decel lanes on hilain St. will be provided. They require 3 variances from the subdivision ordinance: (1) width of_ right-of- way to be 40 feet, not 50; (2) setback from r-w to be 15 feet not 25; (3) amount of acreage being less than 5 acres. The first two are requested to permit the design of curvilinear streets more in keeping with typical Carmel subdivisions and the third because the total land in this project is just over 6 acres, making 5 acres of open space impossible. Easements for the utilities will be next to the R-O-W to permit maximum usage of land as front yard. Side- walks will thus be next to streets, in turn causing a problem fo-r location of mailboxes. Their entry sign plan cai led for signs to be above two sets of common mailboxes located on main street and the committee asked the petitioner to consider locating the mail- boxes at the rear of the project in the common open area and re' - designing the entry signs. The petitioner will include in his covenantt that parking will be permitted on only one side of the street because it will be narrow. The garages will be extra deep so would accommodate 2 small cars whilethe driveways will hold two cars parked tightly. Mr. Ellis moved and Mr. Riley seconded a motion to recommend approval of this project and the necessary variances, subject to Mr. Kiphart's reviewin-a the location of mailboxes and the design of entry signs. The votec),n was unanimous for approval. (3-0) Docket ## 5 -82P Winterwoo d ( Shadow Ridge) Committee members present: Clyde Riley, Sandra Long, Fred Ellis Also in` attendance: Terry Litvan, Kurt Woerner Petitioners: R. J. Klein, Chris White (Midstates Engr.) Preliminary Plat showed 40 lots; final plat will show 39 as lots in thk�� jo er have been enlarged. The land is the old Canter Estateo z�nepS-1, between Estancia and Spring 'Yfill Rd. Water will be provided by Indianapolis. Homes will be on septic systems. They are requesting private streets in order to maintain landscaped islands in the center of the cul-de-sacs. As per a very complete set of covenante,a homeowners assn. will maintain the streets.