HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC-08-07-00-04 Fiscal Plan C-205RESOLUTION NO. CC-08-07-00-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARMEL, INDIANA
ADOPTING A WRITTEN FISCAL PLAN AND DEFINITE POLICY FOR AN AREA
KNOWN AS THE ANNEXATION TERRITORY IDENTIFIED IN ORDINANCE NO. C-205
WHEREAS, Indiana Code Section 36-4-3-3.1 requires the City to develop a written fiscal plan
and establish a definite policy, by resolution of its legislative body, that meets the requirements of Indiana
Code Section 36-4-3-13 for the area proposed to be annexed into the City by Ordinance No. C-205 (the
"Annexation Territory"); and
WHEREAS, this written fiscal plan and definite policy adopted by resolution complies with the
requirements of Indiana law to provide services of a non-capital nature to the Annexation Territory within
one (1) year after the effective date of the annexation in a maxmer equivalent in standard and scope to
those non-capital services provided to areas within the current corporate boundaries, regardless of similar
topography, patterns of land use, and population density; and
WHEREAS, this written fiscal plan and definite policy adopted by resolution complies with the
requirements of Indiana law to provide services of a capital nature to the Annexation Territory within
three (3) years after the effective date of the annexation in the same manner those services are provided to
areas within the current corporate boundaries, regardless of similar topography, patterns of land use, and
population density and in a manner consistent with federal, state and local laws, procedures, and planning
criteria; and
WHEREAS, the level of services set forth in this plan is the same level of municipal services,
both capital and non-capital, to other segments of interstate highway and associated right-of-way within
the corporate limits of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Carmel.
Indiana, as follows:
1. The above recitals are incorporated herein by this reference and shall be deemed part of
the City's written fiscal plan and definite policy for the Annexation Territory.
2. The Common Council of the City of Carmel, Indiana, hereby adopts a written fiscal
plan and definite policy as the written fiscal plan and definite policy for the Annexation Territory, more
particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto.
3. Since the Annexation Territory consists exclusively of interstate highway and
associated right-of-way falling within the jurisdiction of the Indiana Department of Transportation, it is
the expectation and understanding of this Council that there will be no services requested or required,
either of a non-capital or capital nature.
Page One of Three Pages
4. The Annexation Territory is currently within the fire, ambulance and police protection
service area of the City of Carreel.
5. The Annexation Territory does not have a population density of at least three (3)
persons per acre and has not been subdivided through separate ownership into lots or parcels such sixty
percent (60%) or more of which are one (1) acre or less in size.
6. There is no estimated cost to any City department for the planned services to be
furnished to the Annexation Territory.
7. The City does not anticipate that the employees of any other governmental entities will
have their jobs eliminated by virtue of the proposed annexation. However, if any such jobs are
eliminated, the City will provide notice of any City job openings to such displaced employees in the same
manner as it provides such information to the general public.
8. The sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this Resolution are
separable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this Resolution shall be declared
unconstitutional, invalid or unenforceable by the valid judgment or decree of a court of competent
jurisdiction, and such unconstitutionality, invalidity or unenforceability shall not aft~ct any of the
remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this Resolution.
9. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after the date of its passage,
execution by the Mayor, and such publication as is required by law.
~OUNCIL FOR
ATTEST~A,~,%,,' -
Diana L. Co~dray, IXMC, C~eeasurer
Ordinance No. CC-08-07-00-04
Page Two of Three Pages
[ [ h~i Rcstlkmoa ptepal ed by Dt,uglas C Haney, Camlel City Attorney]
Presented by me to the Mayor of the City of Carmel, Indi a, on the f//~ day of
.2000.
Diana L. Cordray, IAMC, ~reasurer
2000.
rainard Mayor
Diana L. Cordray, IAMC, ClerTasurer
Ordinance No. CC-08-07-00-04
Page Three of Three Pages
City of Carreel, Indiana
1-465 Corridor
Annexation Area
Fiscal Plan
July 31, 2000
Wabash Scientific, inc.
Michael R. Shaver, President
4742 Bluffwood North Drive
Indianapolis, IN 46228
(voice) 317/299-9529
(fax) 317/329-9885
(e-mail) wabsci@aol.com
EXHIBIT A
Table of Contents
Executive Summary of the Fiscal Plan ..............................................................................
Description of the Annexation Area ..................................................................................
Informal Description of the 1-465 Corridor Annexation Area ...............................
Development/Land Use in the Area .......................................................................
Annexation Policies ...........................................................................................................
Statement of Purpose .............................................................................................
Policy Conclusions ................................................................................................
Statement of Fact ...................................................................................................
Statutory Considerations ....................................................................................................
Contiguity ..............................................................................................................
Population Density .................................................................................................
Width of 1-465 Corridor ........................................................................................
"Urbanized" Area ...................................................................................................
Land Use ................................................................................................................
Conclusions Regarding Statutory Issues ................................................................
Providing Municipal Services ............................................................................................
Non-Capital Services .............................................................................................
Police Protection ........................................................................................
Fire Protection ............................................................................................
Street Department ......................................................................................
Animal Control ..........................................................................................
Health Department Services ......................................................................
Emergency Medical Services .....................................................................
Parks Department .......................................................................................
Department of Community Services: Planning & Zoning .........................
City Administration ...................................................................................
Municipal Court .........................................................................................
Capital Services .....................................................................................................
Highways & Roads ....................................................................................
New Fire Facilities .....................................................................................
Fire Hydrants .............................................................................................
Water ........................................................................................................
Sewers ........................................................................................................
Drainage .....................................................................................................
Street Lights on Federal Highways ............................................................
Conclusions ............................................................................................................
Comparable Service to Comparable Areas ...........................................................
1-465 Corridor Annexation Area: Fiscal Plan 2
US3 1 Highway Corridor ............................................................................
US431 Highway Corridor ..........................................................................
Table of Comparability ..............................................................................
Plan for Extending Municipal Services .................................................................
Methods of Financing ............................................................................................
Property Tax Revenues ..............................................................................
Financing in the Event that Projections Are Inaccurate .............................
Conclusions & Recommendations .....................................................................................
Conclusions ............................................................................................................
Recommendations ..................................................................................................
Employees of Other Govemment Agencies ......................................................................
Extending Political Jurisdictions .......................................................................................
Exhibit A: Legal Description of Annexation Area ............................................................
1-465 Corridor Annexation Area: Fiscal Plan 3
Executive Summary of the Fiscal Plan
The Fiscal Plan detailed in the attached report examines the technical
parameters and considerations as required by Indiana statute. The 1-465
Corridor Annexation Area (the "Annexation Area") contains
approximately 30 acres of land, 100% of which is dedicated to the sole
and exclusive use as interstate highway right of way, in compliance with
IC 36-4-3-2.5. The annexation action is being undertaken for procedural
and technical reasons only. The proposed annexation will generate $0 in
additional municipal revenue as well as $0 in additional municipal service
costs, thereby having no discernable fiscal impact on the municipality.
The direct purpose of this proposed annexation of the Annexation Area is
to accommodate the voluntary annexation (IC 36-4-3-5) of new
development in conjunction with the provision of City services to that
development. This proposal is emirely in compliance with the annexation
policies of the City of Carmel, as discussed herein.
With these considerations, it is appropriate for the City of Carmel to
undertake the annexation of the Annexation Area for the purpose of
establishing a basis of contiguity fbr the future voluntary annexation of
new development along the 1-465 Corridor. Inasmuch as the statute bases
a great proportion of the requirements for annexation on contiguity, it is
important to the future development of the City of Carmel that the
Annexation Area be annexed to the City for technical and legal reasons,
despite the fact that such an annexation would have no fiscal or
operational impact on the municipality.
1-465 Corridor Annexation Area: Fiscal Plan
Description of the Annexation Area
The area proposed for annexation (the "Annexation Area") lies 100%
within the right of way of the 1-465 interstate highway corridor located on
the north side of Marion County and the south side of the City of Carmel
in Hamilton County, Indiana.
Informal Description of the 1~465 Corridor Annexation Area
The Annexation Area is generally described as running diagonally from
northwest to southeast. The (noah) western boundary of the Annexation
Area is located at College Avenue, just south of 101 st Street. The south
eastern boundary of the Annexation Area is located at 96th Street, just east
of the Old Monon Rail corridor (now a jogging/bike path). The
Annexation Area contains approximately 30 acres which are exclusix, ely
used as public, interstate highway corridor and contains no privately
owned land. Due to the narrow width and extended length of the proposed
annexation area, the contiguity of the Annexation Area to the City of
Carmel is less than 12.5%. A legal description of the Annexation Area is
contained in Exhibit A to this report.
Development/Land Use in the Area
The Annexation Area is 100% developed as a high-intensity, limited-
access, interstate highway, transportation corridor. There is no other
development within the Annexation Area, and no private ownership of
land within the area, as defined. The Annexation Area is used exclusively
for high-volume, interstate highway transportation purposes, and will
continue to be used in this manner in perpetuity. Therefore, this
annexation action will have absolutely no impact on any persons,
surrounding land uses or other development. Also, the traffic volume in
the Annexation Area is very heavy, as is common with such highway
corridors. The corridor's limited access design has no interchanges within
the Annexation Area, and therefore, this annexation cannot possibly have
any impact on local transportation issues, either fiscal or operational.
1465 Corridor Annexation Area: Fiscal Plan
Annexation Policies
The City of Carmel undertook the specific task of developing formal
annexation policies by executing a contract for consulting assistance in
July, 2000. The City Council is currently in the process of establishing a
comprehensive set of annexation policies which will be used to govern the
process associated with all future annexation actions by the City. These
policies are not yet complete and final, but are expected to be complete
and final by December, 2000. Interim annexation policies will be
followed during the consideration of the annexation of the Annexation
Area.
Statement of Purpose
There are several specific purposes for the proposed annexation action.
First, legal requirements for annexation include the requirement that any
armexation which borders on a roadway must include the roadway in the
annexed area. This means that adjacent roadway right of way must be
included in the annexation action, thereby transferring certain local
responsibilities for maintenance. This requirement, however, has not been
consistently practiced throughout the state, and in the case of the
Annexation Area, it is appropriate to annex the Annexation Area with
respect to both existing City boundaries and future annexation actions.
Second, Indiana statute establishes that contiguity is a primary
requirement for annexation. Any area proposed for annexation must meet
certain contiguity requirements in order to comply with indiana statute.
Since the Annexation Area cuts across the US 31 highway corridor north
of 96th Street, the Annexation Area must be annexed to the City of Carreel
in order for the City to meet statutory standards for future annexation of
territory adjacent to the Annexation Area. If the Annexation Area is not
annexed, the contiguity with these developed and undeveloped territories
is lost and future voluntary annexations are effectively blocked. even
though the City of Carmel might provide needed services to these areas.
The third purpose of the Annexation Area is to facilitate the voluntary
annexation of new development adjacent to the Annexation Area. This
includes areas near 96th Street and Westfield Boulevard, at the east end of
the Annexation Area which are currently under development. These new
developments have requested to be included within the corporate limits of
the City of Carmel through voluntary annexation. Specific issues with
regard to the voluntary annexation of these new developments will be
addressed in separate documents.
1-465 Corridor Annexation Area: Fiscal Plan
Policy Conclusions
The City of Carmel has consistently and publicly acted toward the end that
the entirety of Clay Township (the "Township") would eventually be
incorporated into the City of Carmel. To argue otherwise would be even
more absurd than the argument that Washington Township (in Marion
County) is not a part of Indianapolis. Carmel has undertaken to plan for
the development of the entire area, has provided for utility service and
treatment capacity for the entire area, and has formally declared the limits
of its future boundaries to coincide with those boundaries of the
Township.
In fact, the only impediment to annexation was and is the issue of
contiguity. At this time, it would appear that the City's eastern boundaries
are more than sufficient to meet the statutory parameters to annex
everything east of Spring Mill Road, providing the annexation actions are
well planned and carefully executed. In addition, the City's western
boundary has sufficient contiguity to extend its boundaries substantially
westward (but perhaps not to consume the entire western portion of the
Township in one action). In addition, there remain a number of "pockets"
of unincorporated areas which are more than 50% contiguous to the City
(the statutory minimum is 12.5%) which could be annexed immediately.
These factors indicate that the City most likely could meet any statutory
test for annexation, even with the most cursory annexation planning.
The City, however, realizes the absolute distinction between existing
development and future development in conjunction with annexation.
Existing development generally contains existing population, and it is
possible that the existing population may not want annexation. Therefore,
the possibility exists that a perfectly legal annexation would have a
political fallout. Such is the price of previous inaction.
At the same time, the City also recognizes that the previous policies need
not be projected to new development. In other words, now that the City is
taking specific and public steps to develop annexation policies, it should
consider whether special steps should be taken to annex new development
before it is actually occupied. By annexing development before it is
occupied, the City generally foregoes a substantial amount of the political
problems which accrue as the new development becomes occupied.
For these reasons, it is recommended that the City continue to develop
annexation policies which recognize and accommodate the difference
between these two annexation situations.
1-465 Corridor Annexation Area: Fiscal Plan
Statement of Fact
The City of Carreel, with the full cooperation of Township authorities, has
developed an integrated system of controlling growth in the metropolitan
area, including the entirety of the Township, through the vigilant control
of new development within the Township at large.
By establishing and implementing consistent development standards
between the incorporated City and the unincorporated area of the
Township, the City has effectively provided for the smoothest possible
transition for municipal annexation. It has protected the interests of
municipal taxpayers while encouraging high quality growth, and in so
doing, the Cannel-Clay Plan Commission has helped to develop one of the
highest standards for quality of life which exists anywhere in Indiana.
Similar joinder agreements for parks and fire protection have virtually
eliminated any disparity of services between the unincorporated and the
incorporated areas of the Township. While these preparations are clear
evidence of excellent city planning, the presence of such high-quality
municipal services throughout the Township causes some confusion with
respect to annexation/incorporation.
To further underscore the City's intent, the City has established boundary
agreements with adjacent municipalities which prescribe an area for
Carreel which consists of the entire area within the Township. Cannel,
Westfield, Noblesville and Fishers all have agreed on the long term
boundaries of the incorporated communities. Of the Ibm municipalities,
Cannel is the closest to being landlocked.
As such, the recent statutory requirement that the City develop and
formally pass a municipal resolution as to its annexation policies
represents only a different technique for affirming activities which the
City had previously undertaken. In effect, the City has had annexation
policies all along, however, they were contained within the overall effort
for well-planned growth of the City.
Based upon theses premises, the proposed annexation of the Annexation
Area complies with the annexation policies of the City of Carmel as stated
herein. Although the land within the Annexation Area is totally dedicated
to service as a public transportation artery, and although it requires no
municipal services, the annexation of the Annexation Area will supply the
future contiguity needed for the annexation of new development, in
accordance with statutory parameters.
1-465 Corridor Annexation Area: Fiscal Plan
Statutory Considerations
The following discussion is directed toward the statutory parameters of
annexation as it relates to the Annexation Area.
contiguity
The Annexation Area is less than 12.5% contiguous to the corporate limits
of the City.
Population Density
Since the Annexation Area is 100% dedicated to use as a public
thoroughfare right of way, the population density of the Annexation Area
is 0.0 persons per acre.
Width of 1-465 Corridor
The Annexation Area is more than 150 feet wide.
"Urbanized" Area
The Annexation Area does not meet the statutory definition of "urbanized
area" insofar as that definition relates to the traditional consideration of
industrial, commercial and/or business development. The area is 100%
dedicated to interstate highway right of way, and has no private
development of any kin& However, as a matter of practicality, any
interstate highway is, in fact, urbanized.
No urban area in any nation on earth exists without streets, roads and
highways. In most communities, the transportation network has many
elements, and each corridor has different capacities for handling traffic.
Interstate highways such as 1-465 were built specifically to handle traffic
associated with urban development, especially commuter traffic consisting
of people moving to and from places of employment or commerce. As
such, the Annexation Area is actually an operative part of an Urbanized
Area.
Wabash Scientific is not prepared to acquiesce to the standard definition
of"urbanized area" in the case of the Annexation Area. No industrial or
business park (both of which would meet the standard definition of
"urbanized area") can exist without the appropriate support of
transportation infrastructure. Therefore, the specific parcels which are
privately owned and developed for private industry and commerce cannot
be separated from the transportation corridors that serve them, any more
than they can be separated from the machinery that manufactures their
products. As such, it is Wabash Scientific's position that the Annexation
|-465 Corridor Annexation Area: Fiscal Plan 9
Area meets the definition of an "Urbanized Area", even though no parcel
within the area is zoned for industrial or commercial use.
We wish to close this issue with one final thought. According to Indiana
statute, an area could be zoned for industrial development, even though
there is no development of any parcels. The statute includes special
provisions for the annexation of industrial parks in this manner. As such,
the mere act of zoning an undeveloped parcel as an industrial area would
meet at least part of the standard definition of "urbanized," even though
the land, itself, was totally undeveloped.
Land Use
The land use of the Armexation Area is 100% dedicated to transportation
right of way. Therefore, the proposed annexation action has no impact on
any person or persons, nor does it have any direct impact on any property
owners with regard to land use. The land use rights of the Indiana
Department of Transportation (INDOT) supercede any rights of the City
of Carmel with regard to interstate highway corridors.
Conclusions Regarding Statutory Issues
Indiana statute is clear in stating that a substantial portion of its statutory
requirement is based on the contiguity between the existing municipality
and the area proposed for annexation. Since the Annexation Area is
adjacent to the southern boundary area of the City of Carmel, the failure to
annex the area would effectively block the City from the future annexation
of areas contiguous to the Annexation Area.
The statute also requires that any annexation of territory adjacent to a
roadway must annex the roadway (IC 36-4-3-2.5). Although this
parameter was primarily intended to require municipalities to take over the
maintenance responsibilities for local roads and county highways adjacent
to the corporate limits of the municipality, the letter of the law does not
distinguish between interstate highways and other roadways in this matter.
Therefore, it is appropriate to annex the Annexation Area for the purpose
of meeting the letter of the statute, as well as to enable the City to establish
a basis of contiguity for future annexations of new development along the
1-465 Corridor.
1-465 Corridor Annexation Area: Fiscal Plan
Providing Municipal Services
The specific developmental parameters associated with the Annexation
Area reduces the issue of the provision of municipal services to a purely
technical argument - generated primarily to satisfy statutory requirements.
Clearly, the statute did not directly address the rare case of annexation of
an area which was 100% federal highway right of way. although the
annexation of highway right of way is often undertaken in combination
with larger areas.
Since the Annexation Area is 100% federal right of way, which does not
require municipal services, the following presentation is made for the
purpose of satisfying statutory requirements.
Non-Capital Services
Under Indiana statute, all non-capital services are to be provided within
one year of the effective date of annexation. By adopting this Fiscal Plan,
the City hereby agrees and commits to offering all non-capital municipal
services as itemized below no later than one year after the approval of the
annexation of the Annexation Area, as required by statute. Non-capital
services are broken down in the following sections of the Fiscal Plan.
POLICE PROTECTION
The Annexation Area is under the specific jurisdiction of the Indiana State
Police for police protection services. This jurisdiction will not change as a
result of the annexation. Local police may still be called upon to assist
state police in some matters, but primary responsibility for police
protection will remain with the State Police. The projected fiscal impact
of the annexation of the Annexation Area on police services is therefore
projected to be $0 per year.
FIRE PROTECTION
The fire protection responsibilities for the Annexation Area will not
change as a result of the annexation, The Annexation Area is not
populated, nor is there any development which would require fire
protection in the common sense of the word. However, fire and
emergency calls would be made for accidents and vehicle fires along the
Annexation Area, just as they are made at the present time. No new fire
stations will be required to serve the Annexation Area. At this time, the
Cannel Fire Department responds to some emergencies in the Annexation
Area. Therefore, such services are already provided to that area. The
projected cost of fire protection services due to the annexation of the
Annexation Area is $0 per year.
1-465 Corridor Annexation Area: Fiscal Plan jr jr
STREET DEPARTMENT
The normal operations of the Carreel Street Department include such
things as street repairs, leaf collection, snow removal, trash collection,
mowing and tree trimming within public rights of way, and traffic control.
The nature of the Annexation Area, however, is such that the area contains
0 lineal feet of local streets requiring repair, maintenance or traffic control,
0 acres of city/local right of way requiring snow removal, mowing or tree
trimming services, and 0 resident population for the generation/removal of
residential trash. It is appropriate to note, however, that the state/federal
highway right of way is currently and will continue to be mowed under
INDOT contract and within the parameters established by INDOT for
interstate highway maintenance. Similarly, snow removal, maintenance,
repairs and traffic control within the Annexation Area is also the
responsibility of INDOT. These responsibilities will not change as a result
of the proposed annexation. Therefore, the projected annual cost of the
services provided by the Carreel Street Department to the Annexation
Area is $0. Any required services of the Cannel Street Department will be
provided within one year, as required by statute. However, no such
services are projected to be necessary, due to the nature of the Annexation
Area.
ANIMAL CONTROL
The need for animal control within the Annexation Area is generally
acknowledged to be limited to the removal of the carcasses of animals
killed in vehicular accidents. Within this state/federal highway right of
way, these animal carcasses are removal by INDOT personnel, either
directly or by contract. Therefore, there is no projected increase in
services resulting from the proposed annexation. The projected increase
in the cost of these services to the Annexation Area is $0 per year.
HEAL TH DEPARTMENT SERVICES
The nature of the Annexation Area as a federal highway right of way
precludes the necessity of providing health department services within this
area. The Annexation Area has no private development, no population
and is 100% utilized as a highway corridor. These factors combine to
indicate that no health department services will be required (except the
minute possibility that there would be an accident involving a vehicle
carrying passengers suffering from a contagious disease). As there is no
demonstrable need for health department services except in the most
unlikely of situations, the projected annual cost of such services to the
Annexation Area is $0.
1-465 Corridor Annexation Area: Fiscal Plan
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERFICES
The Emergency Medical facilities of the City of Carreel and Hamilton
County currently share the responsibility for responding to emergency
situations within the Annexation Area. These responsibilities will not be
altered by the proposed annexation. Therefore, the projected cost of
providing additional emergency medical services to the Annexation Area
is $0 per year.
PARKS DEPARTMENT
The Annexation Area is 100% state/federal highway right of way. As
such, there are no additional demands on parks created due to the
proposed annexation. Therefore, the projected cost for providing
additional parks services to the Annexation Area is $0 per year.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITYSERFICES: PLANNING & ZONING
DOCS has no jurisdiction within the Annexation Area, because 100 % of
the land within the Annexation Area is state/federal highway right of way.
The land cannot be subdivided or developed for residential, commercial or
industrial use, and it must continue to be used for its intended purpose an
interstate highway corridor. Since DOCS will have no jurisdiction within
the Annexation Area, the projected cost of providing such service to the
Annexation Area is $0 per year.
CITY ADMINISTRA TION
The Annexation Area contains no property that would come under the
operative jurisdiction of the City of Carmel in any detectable manner. No
regulation or service of the City is projected to have any applicability to
the Annexation Area. Therefore, there is no feasible manner in which the
administrative services of the City of Carreel would be relevant to the
proposed annexation. For these reasons, the projected cost of municipal
administration services resulting from the annexation of the Annexation
Area is $0 per year.
MUNICIPAL COURT
The proposed annexation will have no impact on the operation of the
municipal court. The projected cost of providing municipal court services
to the Annexation Area is $0 per year.
1-465 Corridor Annexation Area: Fiscal Plan
Capital Services
Indiana statute provides that municipal capital services be provided within
3 years of an annexation action. The nature of the Annexation Area,
however, being 100% state/federal highway right of way, is such that no
municipal capital services are to be offered within the Annexation Area.
In order to meet the letter of the statute with regard to this Fiscal Plan,
however, the following breakdown and discussion of capital services is
offered.
HIGHWAYS & ROADS
Since 100% of the roads within the Annexation Area are state/federal
interstate highways, the City of Carmel will be required to undertake $0 in
the cost of developing new roads within the Annexation Area. It is the
sole responsibility of INDOT to fund all development, expansion and
maintenance of interstate highway corridors. Therefore, the projected
capital cost of providing new or improved roadways within the
Annexation Area is $0.
NEW FIRE FACILITIES
Although fire services are considered to be non-capital municipal services,
it is clear that the development of new fire stations is a capital cost which
must be borne by the municipality. The Annexation Area, however,
contains no development or other land which would increase the current
demand for fire services, nor does it contain any improvement or
circumstance which would require the development of new fire facilities
or new fire fighting capacity. As such, the annexation of the Annexation
Area is projected to result in $0 in increased capital cost for new fire
fighting facilities.
FIRE HYDP~NTS
The Annexation Area will have no fire hydrants installed for the purpose
of fighting fires within the Annexation Area. At this time, and in the
future, any fires to be fought within the Annexation Area may utilize fire
hydrants located in the neighborhoods adjoining the Annexation Area
(which serve the fire protection needs of the developments adjoining the
area), or may be fought using tanker vehicles which carry their own water
supply. Therefore, the projected cost of providing fire hydrants within the
Annexation Area is $0.
WA TE R
The Annexation Area has water lines running beneath the highway
pavement for the purpose of providing municipal water services to
1-465 Corridor Annexation Area: Fiscal Plan
adjacent private developments. Since there is no private development or
water consumption within the Annexation Area, per se, there has been no
need to tap these water facilities for use within the Annexation Area. The
elevated design of the interstate highway in this area means that the water
lines are located substantially below the grade level of the roadway.
However, the water service is still present and fully available if the need
were to arise and be determined appropriate by INDOT. Due to these
considerations, the projected cost of providing water service to the
Annexation Area is $0.
SEWERS
The Annexation Area has sewer lines running beneath the highway right
of way. These lines were constructed to provide sewer service to private
developments along the 1-465 Corridor, including residential and
commercial development. At this time, these existing developments have
access to the sewer facilities afforded to them, although the Annexation
Area, per se, has no need for such services. As in the case of water
service, sewer service is available within the Annexation Area, but the
nature of the land use within the Annexation Area makes such service
unnecessary. Therefore, the projected capital cost of providing sewer
service to the Annexation Area is $0.
DRA INA GE
Drainage facilities within the Annexation Area are designed, constructed
and maintained by INDOT. The traditional interstate highway drainage
design includes stormwater catch basins in heavily paved areas with high
runoff' coefficients, as well as drainage ditches with heavy vegetative
cover designed to collect, absorb and slow the runoff associated with the
highway fi~cility. The design is executed in a manner that draws the water
off of the pavement as quickly as possible, while maximizing its
retention/detention within the immediate drainage system and slowing its
progress toward any surface waterways. This design prevents and/or
minimizes flooding associated with the presence of the highway facility.
as well as minimizing the pollutant loads from such things as petroleum,
grits and road salts associated with the vehicular traffic.
As with other capital and non-capital services, the drainage service is paid
100% through state/federal funding on interstate corridors. Consequently,
the projected local capital cost for drainage facilities associated with the
Annexation Area is $0.
1-465 Corridor Annexation Area: Fiscal Plan
STREET LIGHTS ON FEDERAL HIGHWAYS
The development, installation and maintenance of street lights along
federal interstate corridors is 100% paid by through state and federal
funding. The Annexation Area will have no locally installed or
maintained street lights because there are 0 lineal feet of existing local
roadway within the Annexation Area. Therefore, the projected capital cost
of providing this service to the Annexation Area is $0.
Conclusions
The Annexation Area is important to the future growth of the City of
Carreel for procedural purposes only, due primarily to the parameters of
annexation under Indiana statute. The City will not be required to provide
any capital or non-capital municipal services to parcels within the
Annexation Area as a result of this annexation. Therefore. the cost of
providing such municipal services is projected to be $0 per year. At the
same time, the annexation of the Annexation Area is projected to produce
$0 per year in additional revenue to the City. As a practical matter, the
annexation of the Annexation Area carries no fiscal or developmental
impact to the City or the local area, except insofar as the City would be
able to establish future contiguity for the purpose of annexing new
development along the 1-465 Corridor.
Comparable Service to Comparable Areas
The issue of identifying "comparable areas" under Indiana statute was left
somewhat unclear by recent statutory amendments. In Fact, the amended
statute states that a full range of municipal services are to be afli>rded the
annexed area, regardless of issues of land use, topography, and so forth,
These caveats were added to the state statute because municipalities were
using this provision as a loophole to avoid the cost of providing property
owners with appropriate and useful municipal services.
At the same time. varying configurations of/and use require varying
configurations of municipal services. Clearly, municipal services to an
industrial park or airport are different in nature and intensity t~om the
municipal service requirements of an apartment complex. As such, it is
appropriate to consider "comparable areas" as a means of determining any
municipal services which are required as a result of that land use. The
following "comparable areas" are therefore cited.
US 31 HIGHW,,t Y CORRIDOR
The City of Carmel previously annexed the US 31 Highway Corridor into
the incorporated City of Carmel. The US 31 Corridor is very similar to
the 1-465 Corridor in that both are limited access highway corridors, 100%
1-465 Corridor Annexation Area: Fiscal Plan
dedicated to land use as public thoroughfares. No other land use will be
allowed within the corridors, and since no persons or businesses are
located therein, the requirement for municipal services is limited to those
services which are necessary to maintain the area in a manner that allows
it to function safely in its intended use. As the intended use of a highway
corridor is the operation of vehicular traffic, municipal services will be
extended, as shown in the table below, to support that land use.
US 431 HIGHWAY CORRIDOR
Precisely the same relationship exists with regard to the US 431 Corridor.
Again, the land use of the US 431 Corridor is the safe operation of
vehicular traffic. As such, the municipal services required to maintain and
facilitate that land use are precisely the same as for any major federal
highway corridor. These municipal services - offered both by INDOT and
the City of Cannel - are itemized in the table below.
TABLE OF COMPARABILITY
The following table summarizes the municipal services for each of the
comparable corridors, as well as for the 1-465 Corridor (including the
Annexation Area).
Comparable Services Table
US 31 US 431 1-465
Police PatroLs by State Police yes yes yes
Supplemental Police Assistance by City Police yes yes yes
Fire Protection by City of Carreel yes yes yes
Emergency Medical Assistance by City of Carmel yes yes yes
Road/Street Repairs by INDOT yes yes yes
Road/Street Repairs by City of Carreel n/a n/a n/a
Snow Removal by INDOT yes yes yes
Traffic Control by INDOT yes yes yes
Snow Plowing by City of Carnnei n/a n/a n/a
Administrative Services by City of Carrnei n/a n/a n/a
Leaf Collection by INDOT n/a n/a n/a
Trash CoLlection by City of Carreel n/a n/a n/a
Mowin9 and Tree Trimming by INDOT yes yes yes
1465 Corridor Annexation Area: Fiscal Plan
Animal Control {removal of carcasses) by INDOT yes yes yes
Capital & Non-Capital Parks services (jointier) n/a n/a n/a
Health Department Services through County n/a n/a n/a
Sewer & Water Utilities from City of Carmei yes yes yes
Capital Drainage Services by INDOT yes yes yes
Capital Drainage Services by City of Carmel n/a n/a n/a
Capital Street Lights by INDOT yes yes yes
Capital Street Lights by City of Carmel n/a n/a n/a
Plan for Extending Municipal Services
The proposed annexation of the Annexation Area will not require the
extension of any services which are not already afforded the area~
Inasmuch as 100% of the area within the Annexation Area is uniquely and
permanently dedicated to use as state/federal highway right of way, there
will be no requirement for providing municipal services to that area. As
such, the cost of such services is projected to be $0 and the revenues
generated through the annexation of the Annexation Area is projected to
be
For these reasons, the plan for extending municipal services is that all
services required by and appropriate to the land use within the Annexation
Area are currently being provided and any other municipal services within
the Annexation Area which are later found to be necessary and required by
INDOT will be negotiated separately.
Methods of Financing
Annexation of the Annexation Area will not generate any demand for
municipal services within the area. Therefore, there is no projected cost to
the City as a result of the proposed annexation action. Based on this
projection, it is not necessary to finance any capital or non-capital services
resulting from the annexation of the Annexation Area, because there are
no such services projected to occur therein.
PROPER TY TAX RE VENUES
Since the Annexation Area is 100% owned by the State of Indiana, it will
generate $0 in property tax revenues to the City. A revenue stream orS0
will therefore not support any issuance of municipal debt or repayment of
any bond. The projected cost of extending municipal capital and non-
1-465 Corridor Annexation Area: Fiscal Plan
capital services to the Annexation Area is $0.
FINANCING IN THE EI/ENT THAT PROJECTIONS ARE INACCURATE
The projected cost of services resulting from the annexation of the
Annexation Area is $0. If this projection later is found to be inaccurate,
and it is determined that additional municipal services must be supplied to
the Annexation Area for some reason, such costs will have to be paid
other revenues of the City, including property tax and COlT revenue
streams. Given, however, that the entire Annexation Area is highway
right of way, the likelihood of such an inaccuracy is extremely remote.
Employees of Other Government Agencies
This annexation action is projected to have no impact on the employees of
any other government agency at a township, county or state level. The
City is not aware of any employee from any government agency who will
lose their job because the Annexation Area is annexed into the
incorporated City of Carmel. However, if it is later determined that the
annexation of the Annexation Area by the City of CmTnel does have such
an impact, the City will consider any displaced person tbr employment at
a comparable position within City government. This consideration,
however, is not and shall not be construed as a commitment by the City to
hire any individual, whatsoever.
Extending Political Jurisdictions
The Annexation Area contains 0 population, and holds no developable
land which could later support population. As a result, the annexation of
the Annexation Area will have no impact on political jurisdictions at the
local/municipal, county or state levels. The annexation, however, will
require a technical amendment to the map of political districts to include
the Annexation Area in one or more of the City' s Common Council
districts, as well as the adjustment of the technical boundaries of certain
other elected offices. As stated, however, these adjustments are purely
technical in nature and will not affect any voters or other citizen residents
of the Annexation Area.
1-465 Corridor Annexation Area: Fiscal Plan ] 9
Conclusions & Recommendations
Conclusions
The analysis of costs and revenues indicates that the annexation of the
Annexation Area will have no fiscal impact on the City, due to the fact
that 100% of the Annexation Area is irreversibly committed to serve as
federal highway right of way. As such, the Annexation Area will have no
population and no regulated land uses within the jurisdiction of any local
authority. At the same time, the Annexation Area does have some
contiguity with the boundaries of the City of Carreel, and the fai lure to
include this area within the corporate limits of the City would obviate the
future capacity of the City to annex and serve an area immediately north
of 96th Street and south of the Annexation Area.
In addition, the secondary impact of the failure to annex the Annexation
Area would be that future development along the 1-465 Corridor could not
be included in the City because future contiguity would be blocked by the
1-465 Corridor (if it was not annexed). The combination of these two
impacts suggest the conclusion that the annexation of the Annexation Area
is important to the future growth of the City of Carmel, even though it
generates neither municipal revenue nor service cost.
Recommendations
Based on the information presented in this Fiscal Plan and the cnnclusions
cited above, it is recommended that the City of Carmel begin the statutory
process necessary to annex the area referred to herein as the 1-465
Corridor "Annexation Area". This annexation will make it possible for
the City of Carmel to undertake future voluntary annexation of new
development. It is the intent of the City to undertake only voluntary
annexations on the basis of contiguity offered by the Annexation Area.
The City could annex a larger area by including private development, but
does not seek to do so at this time.
1-465 Corridor Annexation Area: Fiscal Plan 20
I