Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutD-693 Signal @ Medical/Rangline AN ORDINANCE ENDING THE CITY CODE OF CARMEL, INDIANA, CHAPTER 41, SECTION 41.08 AND SCHEDULE B THEREOF, ESTABLISHINGAN AUTOMATIC STOP INTERSECTION AT MEDICAL DRIVE AND RANGELINE ROAD WHEREAS, the City of Carmel has adopted a Code of Ordinances which constitute the City Code of Carmel, Indiana; and WHEREAS, said Code of Ordinances provides for traffic control and the establishment of stop intersections at Chapter 41.08; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the citizens of the City of Carmel, Indiana, that City Ordinance 41, Section 41.08, and Schedule B thereof, be amended to establish an automatic vehicular traffic stop at the intersection.of Medical Drive and Rangeline Road, Carmel, Indiana. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF.CARMEL, INDIANA, THAT Carmel City Ordinance, as amended, Chapter 41, Section 41.08, and Schedule B thereof, is hereby amended to establish an automatic vehicular traffic stop at the intersection of Medical Drive and Rangeline Road in Carmel, Indiana. IT 'IS FURTHER ORDAINED that the Carmel Street Department shall post all necessary signage as required by this Ordinance, forthwith. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. Passed by the Common Council of the City of Carmel, Indiana, this ~ day of Soptombe.~, 1990. COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARMEL, INDIANA By D Presidin~ 0 ricer ' f ATTESTATION: SAN W. JONES ' -Treasurer ~..AFF1C SIGNAL WARRANT ANAL~ S CiTY OF CARMEL RANGELINE ROAD & MEDICAL DR, Location: Date: RANGELiNE ROAD & MEDICAL DR. JANUAR~ 28, 1987 Qualifiers: School Crossing ExistinK Signal isolated Community urider 10,O00 Rural Warrant Applicable 85th Percentlie S'p~ed on Major Street 40 MPH Speed Warrant Applicable RANGELINE ROAD ' : Major Street MEDICAL DRIVE :"'Minor Street 2 No No No No Unknown No Lane Approach Lane Approach WARRANT 1 - MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME Rangeline Road Medical Drive Required Volum~ 60O 150 Hours in Common Requirement:' Eight {8) hours in common. , Warrant 1 is not met, Hours Met ll ,| WARRANT 2 - iNTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC Rangel{n~ Road Medical Drive Required Volume 900 75 Hours in Common Requirement: Eight {8) hours in Common, Warrant 2 is met, Hours Me t 9 9 'WARRANT 3 - MINIM~,, PEDESTRIAN VOLUME Pedestrian volumes are unknown. Pedestrian will not be a factor at this location. Warrant 3 is not met, WARRANT 4 - SCHOOL CROSSING There is no school or school crossing at this location. Warrant 4 is not met. WARRANT 5 - PROGRESSIVE MOVEMENT This traffic signal is not required to maintain proper groupin~ of vehicles. Warrant 5 is not met. WARRANT 6 - ACCIDENT EXPERIENCE No accident data. Warrant 6 is not met. WARRANT 7 - SYSTEMS .WARRANT Medical Drive is a minor route. Warrant 7 is not met. WARRANT 8 - COMBINATION OF WARRANTS Adjusted volumes = 80% of Warrants 1, 2, and 3. Adjusted Volumes (80%) Major St. Minor St. Compliance Hour Warrant 1 :180 lZ0 5 Warrant 2 720 60 12 Warrant 3 Not Applicable Requirement: At least two of Warrants 1, 2, or 3 must each have eight (8) hours of compliance. Warrant 8 is not met. WARRANT 9 - FOUR L_JR VOLUMES Four highest volumes - Major Route Plotted Major Minor Point Hour Street Street 1. 5-6P 1694 109 2. 12-1P 1599 147 3. 4-5P 1418 162 4. 1-2P 1354 150 Use Figure: 4-3 Use Curve: B Note: Points 1, 2, 3, fall above line "B" and off ~raph. Requirement: Four hours of an average day the plotted points representing the vehicles.per hour on the major street (total both approaches) and the corresponding vehicles per hour on the higher volume minor street approach (one direction only) all fall above the curve in Figure 4-3 for the existing combination of approach lanes. or When the 85th percentile speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 miles per hour or when the intersection lies within a built-up area of an isolated community having a population less than ]0,000 the four hour volume requirement is satisfied when the plotted points referred to fall above the curve in Figure 4-4 for the existinK combination of approach lanes. Warrant 9 is met. WARRANT 10 - PEAK DELAY AND VOLUME WARRANT No data available. Warrant 10 is not met. WARRANT 11 - PEAl{ ..,JUR VOLUME Highest Volume - Major Route Plotted Major Minor Point Hour Street Street 1. 5-6P 1694 109 Use Figure: 4-5 Use Curve: B Note: The point does not fall above line "B". Requirements: The peak hour volume warrant is satisfied when the plotted point representin~ the vehicle per hour on the major street (total of both apppoaches) and the corresponding vehicle per hour of the higher volume minor street approach (one direction only) for 1 hour (any four consecutive 15-minute periods) of' an average day falls above the curve in Figure 4-5 for the existing combination of approach lanes. or When the 85th percentlie speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 miles per hour or when the intersection lies within a built-up area of an isolated community having a population less than 10,000, the peak hour volume requirement is satisfied when the plotted point referred to above falls above the curve in Figure 4-6 for the existing combination of approach lanes. Warrant 11 is not met. Summary : The followin~ warrants are met 2 - 9 . ~~< 0'!'02I 0 )> '0 '0 O 0 -r rrl 0 0 0 0 O O t C) MINOR STREET HIGH VOLUME APPROACH -- VPH 0 0 C) O 0 / / ;13 i 0 ~3 0 ~3 f~ -rl 0 C I 0 < ~0 O r- > ]) )) Z MINOR STREET HIGH VOLUME APPROACH -- VPH I S--T 3~N91-.-I. CITY OF CARMEL TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY CLIENT LOCATION DATE : CITY OF UARMEL : RANGELINE RD. MEDICAL : 1-19-88 DR. DI RECTiON OF TRAVEL + {- HOUR 9-10 10-11 11-12 12-1 1- 2 2- 3 3- 4 4- 5 5- 6 PASSENGER : NORTHBOUND -~ + LEFT ' THRU ' , , TRUCK BOTH~PASS TRUCK BOTHSPASM + AM 152 16 168 416 41 457 419 52 471 332 69 401 349 56 405 464 50 514 PM 671 59 730 546 55 601 377 53 430 554 42 596 611 30 641 792 23 815 5683 91.2% PASS RIGHT ' ! TRUCK BOTH~ -+ ! 26 1 27: 55 5 60: 68 5 60 4 64: 36 2 38~ 56 2 58: 61 5 66~ 62 2 64: 58 9 67~ 66 0 66: 79 2 81~ 73 2 75: + 700 94.7% TRUCK 546 8.8% 39 5.3% BOTH 6229 89.4% 739 10.6% PASS TOTAL TRUCK BOTH: | 178 17 195: 471 46 517: 487 57 544: 392 73 465: 385 58 443: 520 52 572~ ! 732 64 796: 608 57 665~ 435 62 497: 620 42 662: 690 32 722~ 865 25 890: --- + 6383 91.6% 585 8.4% 6968 100.0% CLIENT LOCAT 1 ON DATE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL CiTY OF CARHEL TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMHARY : CITY OF CARHEL : RANGELiNE RD. HEDICAL DR. : 1-19-88 SOUTHBOUND + ' HOUR + " 6- 7 7- 8 8- 9 9-10 10-11' 11-12 12-1 1- 2 2- 3 3- 4 4- 5 5- 6 + LEFT $ 'PASS TRUCK BOTH , + ' THRU ' , ! 'PASS TRUCK BOTHg I + + I I I I 94 0 94I 59 9 : 33 2 35~ 518 33 5511 I 55 4 59I 328 52 380: : 36 3 39~ 317 62 3'79~ ~ 39 1 40: 316 59 375: : 62 2 641 454 65 5191 I 63 6 69I 657 77 734: ] 59 2 611 555 73 628~ I 54 6 60: 442 64 506~ : 58 4 62: 577 32 609~ ~ 66 2 68: 582 46 628~ :' 66 1 671 712 25 737: 4 + + RIGHT PASS TRUCK BOTH TO'I'AL ' ! PASS TRUCK BOTH~ I I 153 9 1621 551 35 5861 383 56 439~ 353 65 418: 355 60 415: 516 67 583~ 720 83 803~ 614 75 689~ 496 70 566~ 635 36 671: 648 48 696~ 778 26 804: PASSENGER TRUCK BOTH 685 95.4% 33 4.6% 718 10.5% 551.7 90.2% 597 9.8% 6114 89.5% 6202 90.8% 630 9.2% 6832 100.0% CLIENT LOCAT 1 ON DATE DIREC'rlON OF TRAVEL -+ CITY OF CARMEL TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY : CITY OF UARMEL : RANGELiNE RD. MEDICAL DR. : 1-19-88 WESTBOUND + + + + HOUR LEFT ! 'PASS TRUCK THRU ' ! BOTH~PASS TRUCK BOTH{PASS + RIGHT ' TOTAL ' TRUCK BOTH~PASS TRUCK BOTH~ , 6- 7 ' ! ' 7-8' ' 8-9' I , I 9-10 ' ! ' 10-11 ! ! ' 11 12 ' , , ; , "12-1' ! 1- 2 ' ! ' 2- 3 ' ' 3- 4 ' ! , ' 4- 5 ' ' 5- 6 ' ; ! PASSENGER TRUCK BOTH 17 34 53 54 45 30 39 59 30 33 56 35 0. 17 2 36 1 54 7 61 3 48 2 32 485 94.4% 29 5.6% 514 39.0% 1 40 2 61 5' 35 3 36 3 59 0 35 ' AM ' ' 1 0 1' 8 ' 0 0 O~ 23 ' 29 ' 0 0 O, ' 0 O 0~ 37 ' 4 0 4~ 42 ' 70 ' 3 0 3, ' PM ' ' 5 0 5~ 92 ' 78 ' 6 0 6, ' 12 0 12~ 69 ' 94 ' 8 0 8, ' 18 0 18~ 84 ' 10 0 10~ 63 + ~ 67 100.0% 0 0.0%' 67 5.1% I f ' 26 0 26S 0 8, 1 24~ 57 3 60~ 5 34~ 82 6 88S 5 42~ 91 12 103~ 5 47: 91 8 99: 6 76: 103 8 111~ 10 102: 136 11 147: 5 83: 143 7 150{ 5 74~ 111 10 121~ 4 .98~ 135 7 142: 1 85: 158 4 162~ 1 64: 108 I 109~ 689 93.5% 48 6.5% 737 55.9% 1241 94.2% 77 5.8% 1318 100.0% CLIENT LOCATION DATE CITY OF CARMEL TRAFFlC VOLUME SUMMARY : CITY OF CARMEL : RANGELINE RD. MEDICAL DR. : 1-19-88 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND HOUR ' + I t I ! ' 97 568 ' 54 1 34 DESIGN DATA AM PEAK ' OFF PEAK . 'r u ToT: L T R 'rOT + 516 82 598 ' 730 69 799 . PM PEAK ' T R TOT: -+ 819 81 900: 665: 70 734 804 I 71 770 841 l 89: 40 5 102 147: 59 18 100 177 ~ + + --+ HOUR SUMMARY NB SB + ~ 'TOTAL ' NB+SB WB , , + 195 517 544 465 443 572 796 665 497 662 722 890 - AM - 162 586 439 418 415 583 - PM - 803 689 566 671 696 804 I I 357 26 : 383 1103 60 : 1163 983 88 : 1071 883 103 J 986 858 99 ~ 957 1155 111 ' 1266 ! 1599+ 147 J 1746 1354' 150 ~ 1504 1063 121 : 1184 1333 142 ~ 1475 1418' 162 : 1580 1694 109 J 1803 + TOTAL 15-MiN HOUR PHF 15-MIN HOUR PHF 15-MIN HOUR PHF 6968 46.1% 169 592 O.88 209 796 0.95 279 896 0.80 6832 45.2% 13800 1318 15118 91.3% 8.1% 100.0% - AM PEAK VOLUMES - 202 609 0.;5 - OFF PEAK VOLUMES - 215 803 0.93 - PM PEAK VOLUMES - 239 841 0.88 37 88 0.59 43 147 0.85 47 162 0.86