HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes PC 12-21-21 3. Docket No.PZ-2021-00197 PPA: Reserve at Springmill,Replat Lots 69C-70C.
4. Docket No.PZ-2021-00226 V: UDO Sec.2.06 35 ft.Minimum Front Yard Setback,22 ft. requested
5. Docket No.PZ-2021-00227 V: UDO Sec.2.06 10 ft.Minimum Side Setback/25 ft.Minimum Aggregate,
5 ft. Side Setback/10 ft.Aggregate requested
The applicant seeks primary plat amendment approval and 2 variances to reconfigure 2 lots into 6 lots on 2.7
acres. The site is located at 340 Sanner Ct.and is zoned S-2/Residence. Filed by Duane Sharrer of Weihe
Engineers, Inc on behalf of Steve Pittman,owner.
Petitioner: Steve Pittman,Pittman Partners
• With me tonight are Duane Sharrer of Weihe Engineers,and Gary McNutt of Wedgewood Homes
• Presented an aerial view of the subject property
• I agreed to buy the vacant lots and develop it to exactly like the existing neighborhood. The homeowners
participated in a vote of my plans. We received 100%support from the homeowners.
• The new blot sizes will be about 40% larger than the existing lot sizes in the neighborhood
• We will be extending the existing cul-de-sac to add the additional lots
• The setback variance for a 22-ft front yard setback,matches the building setback lines of the existing homes
within this neighborhood
• We will come back for a future public hearing for the variance on the proposed extended cul-de-sac length
Public Comments: None
Department Report: Rachel Keesling:
• S-2 zoning requires a 35-ft front setback,but this subdivision was originally developed under the Cluster Housing
Ordinance which allowed for reduced setbacks(22-ft)
• The proposed variances are minor and should not have a negative effect on the surrounding properties
• There's a 20-ft platted greenbelt bufferyard that will remain along the north property line
• The Urban Forester still needs to review the revised landscape plan
• The cul-de-sac length will need a variance and it will be heard at a future public hearing in front of the BZA
• Staff recommends this is sent to the Jan.4th Residential Committee with it coming back to the full Plan
Commission for a final vote
Committee Comments:
Nick: Does this need to go to Committee?Is there anything else to discuss?
A Motion made by Kirsh and seconded by Rider to suspend the Rules of Procedure in order to vote on this item.
Approved 7-0,absent Hill,Potasnik.
A Motion made by Zoccola and seconded by Rider to approve PZ-2021-00197 PPA, PZ-2021-00226 V,and PZ-
2021-00227 V contingent upon addressing all TAC comments
Approved 7-0,absent Hill,Potasnik.
6. Docket No.PZ-2021-00204 PUD: Flora on Springmill PUD Rezone.
The applicant seeks PUD rezone approval to allow a new subdivision consisting of townhomes,duplex homes,
and single-family homes. The site is located at 9950 Spring Mill Rd.and is zoned S-2/Residence. Filed by Jim
Shinaver and Jon Dobosiewicz of Nelson&Frankenberger on behalf of Pittman Partners and Onyx and East,
LLC.
Petitioner:Jim Shinaver
• Presented a site location map, context plan, site plan, and building types and their location within the site
• This development will contain a mix of duplex two-family homes,brownstones, single-family courtyard homes,
rooftop deck townhomes,and pitched roof townhomes
• We will have tree preservation areas(TPA)designated around our site
• A multi-use path will be installed along Spring Mill Road
4
Plan Commission Meeting Minutes 12-21-21