HomeMy WebLinkAboutCCM-11-30-92 SPECIALSPECIAL MEETING MINUTES
CARMEL CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 30, 1992
7:00 P.M.
ONE CIVIC SQUARE / COUNCIL CHAMBERS
The special meeting of the City Council and Board of Public Works
and Safety was called to order by Mayor Johnson followed by the
pledge of allegiance.
City Council members in attendance were Frank Fleming, Tim Story,
James Quinn, Alan Potasnik, Tom Kendall, Chris Painchaud and
Luci Snyder. Board of Public Works and Safety members in
attendance were Vaughn Story and Rick McKinney. City Attorney
Steve Brown and Clerk-Treasurer Susan W. Jones was also in
attendance.
Mayor Johnson requested permission to step down from the presiding
officer's chair in order to participate in the evening's
presentation. Johnson asked Councilman Story to chair the meeting
until the arrival of Council president Painchaud.
PRESENTATION OF ORDINANCES NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW WATER
Councilman
PLANT AND FACILITIES \ ORDINANCES A-65, A-66 AND A-67:
Kendall made a motion to introduce Ordinance A-65 establishing the
rates and charges for the use of and services rendered by the
waterworks system of the City of Carmel, Ordinance A-66 amending
Chapter 9, Article 2, Section 9-31(a) of the Carmel City Code and
Ordinance A-67 authorizing the issuance of waterworks revenue bonds
for the purpose of refunding its outstanding revenue bonds and
providing funds to pay the cost of additions, extensions and
improvements of the municipal waterworks of Carmel and providing
the safeguarding of the interests of the owners of said bonds and
repealing ordinances inconsistent herewith. Kendall also motioned
to dispense with the reading in favor of a full explanation. The
motion was seconded by Councilman Quinn.
Councilman Potasnik addressed the Council and expressed his
opposition to a petition submitted on behalf of the Common Council
to the IURC on August 26th to consider rate adjustments. Potasnik
stated the Council had not acted on such a matter and the Council
was the only body authorized to do so on behalf of the City.
Potasnik stated the petition was filed in a furtive manner and made
a motion to withdraw the petition to the IURC until such time as it
was authorized by the Council. The motion was seconded by Story.
Discussion ensued among Council members regarding the petition to
the IURC. Potasnik asked the Clerk to provide copies of the IURC
petition to all Council members. Potasnik read the IURC petition.
Potasnik stated he wanted to be sure his constituents and other
members of the community were assured no action had been taken by
the Council. Discussion of the petition continued among Council
members.
Johnson distributed approved copies of Resolution CC-8-17-92-5
along with the minutes passed by the Common Council at the regular
meeting of August 17, 1992 authorizing submission of the petition
to the IURC. Potasnik stated the motion remained on the floor
since Council members had not received a copy of the IURC petition.
Johnson stated a letter from Ice, Miller, Donadio and Ryan along
with the IURC petition was submitted to the Council members as
supporting documentation to Resolution CC-8-17-92-5 in August.
Story stated upon review of the minutes and signed resolution of
August 17th, it was clear the Council had indeed been properly
informed by the Mayor of the IURC petition and had voted
unanimously in favor of the petition.
Potasnik withdrew his motion.
An overall presentation of the waterworks project was made by
Mayor Johnson with specifically detailed information provided and
given by bond council Patty Zelmer of Ice, Miller, Donadio and
Ryan, fiscal consultant Kieth Gambrel of Katz, Sapper & Miller, Don
Silvey of Commonwealth Engineering, and Derrick Burks of Arthur
Anderson, & Co. Each speaker answered pertinent questions by
Council members throughout the evening's presentation.
Discussion ensued among Council members concerning some of the
following topics: alternatives to the water project expansion such
as use of Indianapolis Water Company, privatization, bond costs and
ratings, rate tables, Carmel Utility financial reporting procedures
and revenue requirements.
Kendall asked specific questions regarding Ordinances A-65, A-66
and A-67. Patty Zelmer of Ice, Miller, Donadio and Ryan, stated a
corrected final draft of the Ordinances would be submitted to the
prior to the second reading at the December 7th City Council
meeting. Johnson stated the corrected ordinances would be
delivered to the Council by Friday (December 4th). Kendall made a
motion to add Ordinances A-65, A-66 and A-67 to the agenda of the
December 7, 1992 City Council meeting for a second reading. The
motion was seconded by Story. All members voted aye.
Story stated his schedule prohibited him from being able to attend
the December 7, 1992 meeting and urged the Council to vote in favor
of the ordinances while seriously considering the future health of
Carmel residents which would require safe and adequate water
supplies.
ORDINANCE D-872 / AN ORDINANCE RE-ESTABLISHING THE CUMULATIVE
CAPITAL SEWER FUND FOR THE CITY OF CARMEL, INDIANA AND ESTABLISHING
Quinn made a motion to introduce
A TAX RATE FOR SAID FUND:
Ordinance D-872. The motion was seconded by Story. Clerk-
Treasurer Jones read Ordinance D-872 an ordinance re-establishing
the Cumulative Capital Sewer fund for the City of Carmel and
establishing a tax rate for said fund. Jones stated the fund must
be re-done every four years and the ordinance simply established
the Cumulative Capital Sewer fund rate at $.05 per $100 assessed
valuation for 1993, 1994 and 1995 as it has been the last four
years. Jones stated the ordinance needed to be sent to the Indiana
State Tax Commissioners before the final budget hearing. Jones
asked that the rules be suspended and act on Ordinance D-872 that
evening in order to meet the deadline. Quinn made a motion to
suspend the rules and act on Ordinance D-872. The motion was
seconded by Councilwoman Snyder. Quinn made a motion to approve
Ordinance D-872. The motion was seconded by Story. Discussion
ensued among Council members regarding Ordinance D-872. Call for
the question. All members voted aye.
RESOLUTION CC-11-30-92-1 / A RESOLUTION REDUCING THE 1992 GENERAL
Story made a motion to adopt Resolution
FUND BUDGET BY $497,505:
CC-11-30-92-1, a resolution reducing the 1992 general fund budget
by $497,505 and dispense with the reading in favor of a brief
explanation from Clerk-Treasurer Jones. The motion was seconded by
Quinn. Jones stated in 1992 a General Fund budget was passed
totaling $10,403,583. Jones stated in order to fund the 1993
operating balance to the desired amount, the Mayor chose to reduce
specific departmental 1992 budgets by $497,505 rather than reduce
the operating balance for 1993 which would be approximately $2.5
million dollars. Jones stated Resolution CC-11-30-92-1 needed
immediate approval by the Council, since the tax commissioners in
order to bring the budget in balance, would arbitrarily cut the
operating balance by $497,505 if the City did not adjust its own
budget through resolution. Discussion ensued among Council members
regarding Resolution CC-11-30-92-1. Call for the question. All
members voted aye.
Upon an inquiry from Councilman Kendall, Mayor
GRAY ROAD OPENING:
Johnson stated unless weather interfered with the project, the
scheduled re-opening of Gray road would be December 15th.
There being no further business before the Council the meeting was
duly adjourned.
Respectfully submitted,
________________________________
Susan W. Jones, Clerk-Treasurer
Approved;
________________________________
T. E. Johnson, Presiding Officer
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Susan W. Jones, Clerk-Treasurer