HomeMy WebLinkAboutStormwater Management System
't'"
'...
(.'
,
,.
..',.
I
~.~
~.
, 7'
..:
i,
.-.
...
...
ill'
'. .
. .......
.~
.
\!lit'
...
..
~
'.'.j
~.~
~~
':_~'
:.:C'.
.,'
,.
.'
......
?
,,'-:.
. .
~OONATOS PIZZA.SITE,. DEVELOPMENT:'.P.ROJECr~
. . . '--' , '.-:':.' ..' ..... - ., . .~_. . - ....' " ". .', ;." " -.' .., . ., ,:' '"," .". ., . ..., . . " ;-'. ..,' - .. .
:~422. ~ys~neW.Y,'City of C,~1t H.M,~~:Co...nty/J~iana .
'.. _,_". .... ~_-. - , .. - ~ . ' . t.. . .' - '.' 1 . . ' .. .
. . _ ' . . A" .,." ' . .' ~ ~. ~ ' -
.-~.
"
. :: . -. - -,. "
....,S,TORMWATER MANAGEMENT .SYSTEM
. ~TECHNICAlJn~JFoRMAtl0N~ R.E-PO'RT '~"
:.~;~' ,". ,:.:,.:,.-,~,.-~-:-.~.-,;""..._~"~,,., ;-,_:_~'";-. '~',,' ,.:, . - ',~ .;, ','<'-..'.' "
. . .
. ':". " ." . ' . '::prePireci:by.-"
':':<J,.UQS & IYIANN:ASSO~IATES,J~C~,
,:4020 ,GOELtERlilout:.~ARD,.,SU,ITE F:-
.' cOLljNtBUS,.'~J~,47201'
'(81~) .34~..Z126
,.
E
, ,-
'.
,,': .
,.... "
;'t '...
";'i'
',-'
.. ~-:--
.' I'
'J ^:
~. .>
.....~.. ',,~
.. '1 . ~
" "
~.
~
, .
~.
.~ ......
" '
".
~. :-.5.
, ;
';
.!:
........, '.
~: ..:
,.."4,'
.;i.
,
. '--....
, .
. -.'
,1:",
'c
, ....
.J .~.
-,,=: -~
';,j-
, :.J.
. ,':-~..;
"':"
h
;';
. . r :
..
',;'
~-'(".
:-r.
.'
... . ~, . J'
....!
T --:'
-.
.;
!.,> .
',-;.
. ~~
D
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
D
o
D
o
D
D
o
D
D
D
DONATOS PIZZA-SITE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
1422 Keystone Way
CITY OF CARMEL, HAMIL TON COUNTY, INDIANA
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DESIGN
TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION
SITE VICINITY MAP
REPORT
APPENDIX
. RAINFALL DATA
. SOILS DATA
. TR-55 DATA
. WATERWORKS DATA
. EXISTING CONDITION DRAINAGE AREA MAP
. PROPOSED CONDITION DRAINAGE AREA MAP
D
o
o
o
o
D
U
o
o
o
o
D
o
o
D
D
D
D
o
DONATOS PIZZA-SITE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
1422 Keystone Way
CITY OF CARMEL, HAMILTON COUNTY, INDIANA
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DESIGN
TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT
PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION
t\t~. ~. ~-
Martin S. Mann, P.E.
Indiana Registration No. 920256
..'"....""
" N S "
,'~'~~.....:.~:~#,
l ~.~~\$Te.;-~~ \
=.. ~ e. I.
-. ~ . i
:*= ~ =.*
. . ~ .
. ~ : .
'::t'" ITATE OF ... R: :
-. . ~-.-
\ ~....{AlOI A ~ ~....!<I...~
. .." .- ,.~...
'-, ~ -.._..- aa\,,~' ,"
"" 'SION,..\.. fC.~~~..~"
"grRr'"
The following report and accompanying computations have been developed by me or
under my direct supervision.
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D'
o
o
o
D
D
o
o
Carmel. Indiana - 1422 Kevstone Way
Site Vicinity Ma~
D
D
D
o
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D 8.
D
D X
82.5
X
8%5.8
D 820.8
D DRAWN:
B.KUHN
D PRaJECf:
DONATOS PIZZA, 1422 KEYSTONE WAY, CARMEL, INDIANA
TITLE:
D SITE VICINITY MAP
(FROM HAMILTON COUNTY GIS)
D
x~.
X
X 8Z'.0
824.'
X
alS.4
11826.9
11 82Z.8
BZ5.7
X
XU", 9
824.$
u
~~
~ ILl
::>
ILl '8' Z
X824. Z ~
o 'c(
ILl
i
~
X
8%4.2
X
829.8
824.6
11828.4
~.~
Ld
11825.6
824.6
X
11825.3
c::::J
O 8Z'.'
X X823.3
Jt822.8
](823.1
1(825.9
DATe:
03-27-01
SCALE:
111 = 200'
X
Bt9.4
X
116TH STREET X X
CHECKED:
E=J c;:::J @
[}825'
I.UKAS
rANN
SSOCIATES
4020 Goeller Boulevard, Suite F
Columbus, Indiana 47201
(812) 342-2126 Fax (812) 342-2124
D
D
U
U
ID
o
U
u
u
u
U
D
D
D
D
o
o
o
o
o
I
Cannel. Indiana - 1422 Kevstone Way
Report
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
o
o
D
D
D
o
D
D
INTRODUCTION
Donatos Pizza is planning to develop a new restaurant at a 1.00 acre site located on the west side
of Keystone Way just north of 116th Street in the City ofCarme~ Hamilton County, Indiana. This
report presents the stormwater drainage system design computations for the proposed project.
The enclosed computations and conclusions support the request for a local stormwater permit.
The data in this report will demonstrate that the proposed development will help to alleviate some
of the existing drainage problems associated with this site by conveying the onsite stormwater
runoff to an existing storm sewer instead of inlets which appear to have no outlet. The
stormwater runoff rate will be reduced by 23% in a ten year event and 26% in a 100 year event.
It will also show that the onsite stormwater system will have 10 year flow capacity.
EXISTING SITE DESCRIPTION
Under existing conditions, the tract consists of an existing masonry building (formerly Noble
Romans Pizza), the associated asphalt parking lot, and three drive entrances. The existing site
drains generally from west to east. A small portion of the west side (0.08 acres) drains via direct
sheet flow off of the property to an existing catch basin located in the asphalt driving area of the
adjoiner to the west. The south half of the site drains via sheet flow to an existing catch basin
located at the northeast comer of the existing east drive entrance. The north half of the site drains
via sheet flow to the north side of the building and along the north curb line or drains into the
access drive to the north of the site with both areas draining to an existing catch basin near the
northeast comer of the site.
Lukas and Mann Associates has obtained a drawing from the city engineer's office that shows an
existing 15" pipe running north and south along the west curb line of Keystone Way. A field
investigation by our office revealed that the two existing catch basins along the west side of
Keystone Way are not connected to this system and appear to have no outlet at all. The
investigation also revealed a 15" concrete pipe running south out of a curb inlet located
approximately 100 feet north of this site.
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
The proposed site will be divided into 3 drainage basins which will collect stormwater via area
inlets and curb inlets. These inlets will convey the stormwater via 12" HDPE pipes to a proposed
structure to be set north of the north curb line of the proposed east drive entrance. This structure
will connect to a structure set over and connected to the existing 15" storm sewer and replacing
the existing catch basin located here. The runoff for the proposed site will be contained
completely onsite and in the proposed storm sewer system and will alleviate the storm drainage
running from this site and onto the access drive north of this site. This should thereby lessen the
drainage load on the existing catch basin which appears to have no outlet.
1
o
o
o
D
I D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
o
o
D
o
o
D
D
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
The onsite stormsewer system has been designed to covey the peak discharge from the post
development 10 year frequency Huff20d quartile, 50% probability rainfalVrunoffevent in an open
channel flow condition. It has also been designed to reduce the potential for road and property
flooding by directing runoff to the existing storm sewer system which has a positive drainage
outlet.
METHODOLOGY
The stormwater drainage conditions were analyzed by studying the available information for the
site. This available information included the USDA Soil Survey for Hamilton County, Indiana,
the site's topographic survey, the site grading/drainage plan, information contained in the
Hamilton County GIS system and the rainfall data contained in the Indiana Department of Natural
Resources Rainfall for Indiana manual.
These data were then used to design the proposed stormsewer system. WATERWORKS uses the
soil type, land use, time of concentration and theoretical rainfall amounts to develop runoff
hydro graphs for each flow entry point in the system (each inlet has its own hydro graph). The
generated hydrographs are combined and routed through the stormsewer system. This
methodology is believed to be more accurate than the rational method and the WATERWORKS
model utilizes the same accepted SCS unit hydrograph methodology found in the SCS TR20
runoff model. The program also computes the hydraulic grade line for each event modeled. .
RESULTS
The pre-developed 10 year peak runoff for this site is 2.96 cfs. The post developed 10 year peak
runoff for this site is 2.27 cfs (a reduction of23%). The pre-developed 100 year peak runofffor
this site is 4.68 cfs. The post developed 100 year peak runoff for this site is 3.47 cfs ( a reduction
of 26%). The reduction in the pre to post rates can be attributed to a reduction in impervious
surface area at the site.
SUMMARY
This report provides technical information supporting the request for local approval of the
proposed drainage system associated with the proposed new Donatos Pizza project along
Keystone Way in Carmel, Indiana. By reducing the impervious surface area of the site and
connecting the stormwater runoff from this site to the IS" pipe along Keystone Way as was
apparently intended, we believe the re-development of this site will improve the existing drainage
conditions.
2
D
Cannel. Indiana - 1422 Keystone Way
D
D
D
D
D
D
. U AmJendix
o
D
I D
o
o
D
o
D
o
D
o
RAIN FALL - J.Q.2. YEAR FREQUENCY - -L HOUR DURATION
D
..
,
I
3"
2.9"
2.9"
-
3.t'~
\0.;.... - ..
..~.
REFERENCE
HYDRO 35 I
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE
STATE OF INDIANA
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
-. DIVISION OF WATER
APRIL 1979
- 1.6 .-
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D,.,
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
I
RAINFALL--L YEAR FREQUE~'CY--LHOUR DURATION
1.4 II
,I' .,
1.411
.~..
".
. -.
-'.
-"......,~--.......
,.r' .
....
.*'
..
.
,
--.
-..
.
-
--
-'-
....
,t
REFERENCE
HYDRO 35
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE
STATE OF I NOlANA
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER
APRIL 1979
- 1.5 ~
D
o
o
o
o
o
D
o
D
o
o
o
o
o
D
o
D
o
o
'-... .
Intermediate durations of 10 and 30 minutes for a desired return period:
10 minute rainfall ..0.590 (15 minut."rainfall) +0;410 (:5 minute"raiD~ll)
I .
30 minute rainfall · 0.490 (60 minute rainfall) + 0.510 (15 minute rainfall)
Intermediate return periods for a desired duration which is less than 1 hour:
5 year rainfall - 0.278 (100 year rainfall) + 0.674 (2 year rainfall)
.-
10 year rainfall · 0.449 (100 year rainfall) + 0.496 (2 year rainfall)
25 year rainfall · 0.669 (100 year rainfall) + 0.293 (2 year rainfall)
50 year rainfall · 0.835 (100 year rainfall) + 0.146 (2 year rainfall)
(flJ-I."Iti)(3.()7)+- t~.Y9t.)(I."2) = 2.08 II
Example: Compute the 25 year - 10 minute rainfall for Indianapolis
Step 1: Determine the 5 and 15 minute rainfalls for return periods of 2
and 100 years from the isopluvial maps.
2 year - 5 minute rainfall a 0.450 inches
2 year - 15 minute rainfall - 0.862 inches
100 year - 5 minute rainfall - 0.800 inches
100 year - 15 minute rainfall a 1.650 inches
Step 2: Compute the 5 and 15 minute rainfall amounts for a 25 year
return period.
25 year - 5 minute rainfall" 0.669 (0.800) + 0.293 (0.450)
III 0.667 inches
25 year - 15 minute rainfall" 0.669 (1.650) + 0.293 (0.862)
.. 1. 356 inches
Step 3: Compute the 10 minute rainfall using the 25 year - 5 and 15
minute amounts:
25 year - 10 minute rainfall .. 0.590, (1.356) + 0.410_ (0.667)
.. 1.074'inches
. '.
"
. .
.\
- 1.7 -
D
D
o
o
o
D
o
o
D
o
D
o
o
D
D
D
D
D
IU
Cannel. Indiana - 1422 Keystone Way
Soils Data
u
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
o
erA
~
............ ~
.....
z
~
~
!U..d
9.26 Ac.
7
!U..d
SITE SOILS CONSIST OF
MIAMI SILT LOAM (MmB2)
DRAWN:
B.KUHN
PROJECT:
DONATOS PIZZA, 1422 KEYSTONE WAY, CARMEL, INDIANA
TTlZE:
DATE:
03-27-01
SCALE:
1" = 200'
alECKED:
SOILS MAP
(FROM HAMILTON COUNTY GIS)
1LI
::>
z
1LI
?(
1LI
Z
~
~
B
922 ~
234.2
010.001 -
O. 659 Ac.
.Q.l..Q
O. 741 Ac.
~
EAST 11 6th STREET
1LI
::>
z
1LI
?(
1LI
Z
~
~
WOODLAND SPRINGS MANOR
002
7. 474 Ac.
4020 Goeller Boulevard, Suite F
Columbus, Indiana 47201
(812) 342-2126 Fax (812) 342-2124
. "X 'V.I. ClUJ. ~.", ~.., ....-...... .......""_.~~..-'~.""-....::..."!':4111._~
'., . e . 00 '0 '0" '00 ..' ',., .... ..-.:.~ :.:'':''~'~.".'., -.: -:",:~'-c~n.'f';
. .. .. " . . : . '. . .~ .' ..... !.:..::..... ....,.~~~...~~.).:..".~.t.~~~4';.~~..
'. ....::...,> ',', :':" ...~~:;...... :-.~......te ',-. .. ....~;.. .-..... r.... ~~e''''':''''':':'''':'~':~~:'~'''~--''''''-
O . . . . '.. " .. . ...,... -. ..:. q, -.-7'.... __::r.....'lIN04..~~..^"..
.' .," ..... . '/Ii'" -:.:.:.\. '.,._.~.
~ . .,. . . .... .. .. .. .....
~. ..~., ":~':.'=" '. ~. ';~":r.',:,::~,~,'. .'~...,'::.
D ~~ . - '. ~~: >, ~.
D ~ ~.
D~ ~.
D
o
D
D
D
D
D
U
D
U
Research Engineers
Christopher B. Burke
Thomas T. Burke
. .
H-94-6
(July 1994)
Hiwwav Extension and Research Project
- ~
for Indiana Counties and Cities
~
A Federal Highway Administration
LTAP Technology Transfer Center
i
o
SOIL LEGEND
o
The first capital letter Is the Initial one of the soli name. The second capital letter Indicates the class of slope.
Symbols without a Slope letter are those with a Slope range of 0 to 2 percent slopes. A final number, 2, In the
symbol Indicates that the soli Is eroded.
D
SYMBOL
D
Br
D
CrA
CsB2
Ee
D
FaA
FoB2
FxC2
D
Ge
HeF
D
MgA
MgB2
tI~
MxD2
MxE2
D
D
OcA
OcB2
NAME
Brookston silty c lay loam
Crosby silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Crosby-Miami silt loams, 2 to 4 percent slopes, eroded
Eel slit loam
Fox loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Fox loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded
Fox complex, 6 to 15 percent slopes, eroded
Genesee silt loam
Hennepin loam, 25 to 50 percent slopes
Martinsville silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Martinsville silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded
Miami Si_~!a p!>'ubstratum
::::: ~: oam, o. percen s ..opes:~r
Miami complex, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded
Miami complex, 18 to 24 percent slopes, eroded
Ockley si It loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Ockley silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded
Re Rensselaer clay loam
D
Sh
Sk
Sn
D
Ub
UC
UtA
utC
Ug
UmB
UmC
UW
D
D
We
Wh
D
D
o
D
o
Shoals silt loam
Sleeth loam
Sloan silt loam
Urban land-Brookston complex
Urban land-Crosby complex
Urban land-Fox complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes
Urban land-Fox complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes
Urban land-Gene see complex
Urban land-Miami complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Urban land-Miami complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes
Urban land-Westland complex
Westland clay loam
Whitaker silt loam
0
D Table 3.3.2
Hydrologic Soil Groups For Indiana Soils
(Shown in parentheses after the soil classification)
D Abscota (A) Birkbeck (B) Clyde (B/D) Ebal (B) Gudgel (C) Kibbie (B)
Ackerman (AID) Bloomfield (A) Cobbsford (D) Eden (C) Guthrie (D) Kings (D)
D Ade (A) Blount (C) Coesse (CID) Edenton C) Kokomo (BID)
Adrian (AID) Bobtown (C) Cohoctah (BID) Edwards (BID) Kosciusko (B)
Alford (B) Bonnell (C) Coloma (A) Eel (B) Hagerstown (C) Kurtz (C)
D Algansee (B) Bonnie (C/O) Colyer (D) Eldean (B) Haney (B)
Algiers (CID) Bono (D) Comfrey (BID) Elkinsville (B) Hanna (B)
Alida (B) Booker (0) Conotton (B) Elliott (C) Harpster (BID) Lafayette (B)
Allison (B) Boonesboro (B) Conover (C) Elston (B) Haskins (C) La Hogue (B)
D Alvin (B) Boots (AID) Conrad (AID) Evansville (BID) Haubstadt (C) Landes (B)
Ambraw (BID) Bourbon (B) Coolville (C) Haymond (B) Lash (B)
Andres (B) Bowes (B) Corwin (B) Hennepin (B) Laramie (B)
0 Aptakisic (B) Boyer (B) Cory (C) Fabius (8) Henshaw (C) Lawrence (C)
Armiesburg (B) Brady (B) Corydon (D) Fairmount (D) Hickory (C) Lenawee (BID)
Ashkum (BID) Branch (B) Coupee (B) Fairpoint (C) High Gap (C) Lindside (C)
Atkins (D) Brems (A) Craigmile (B/D) Farmington (C) Hillsdale (8) Linkville (C)
0 Aubbeenaubbee Brenton (B) Crane (8) Faxon (BID) Holton (C) Linwood (AID)
(B) Bromer (C) Crawleyville (B) Fincastle (C) Homer (B) Lisbon (B)
Ava (C) Bronson (B) Crider (B) Flanagan (B) Hononegah (A) Lobdell (B)
D A vonburg (D) Brookston (BID) Crosby (C) Foresman (B) Hoopeston (B) Lomax (B)
Ayr (B) Bruno (A) Crosier (C) Fox (8) Hoosierville (C) Longlois (B)
Ayrmount (B) Bryce (D) Cuba (8) Frederick (B) Hosmer (C) LosanlVille (C)
0 Ayrshire (C) Burside (B) Cyclone (BID) Free (BID) Houghton (AID) Lucas (D)
Fulton (D) Hoytville (CID) Lydick (8)
Huntington (8) Lyles (BID)
Banlic (C) Cadiz(B) Dana (B) Huntsville (B)
0 Barce (B) Camden (B) Darroch (B) Genesee (B)
Barry (BID) Cana(C) Darroch, bedrock Gessie (B) Mahalasville
Bartle (D) Caneyville (C) subsratum Gilboa (B) lona (B) (BID)
D Battleground (B) Carlisle (AID) (C) Gilford (BID) Ipava (B) Maplehille (C)
Baxter (B) Carmel (C) Dearborn (B) Iroquois (BID) Marker (B)
Beanblossom (B) Carmi (B) Del Rey (C) Iva (C) Markham (C)
D Beasley (C) Casco (B) Deputy (C) Gilford, stratified Markland (C)
Beaucoup (BID) Catlin (B) Derinda (C) substratum Markton (C)
Beckville (B) Celina (C) Desker (A) (D) Jasper (B) Martinsville (B)
Bedford (C) Ceresco (B) Dickinson (B) Gilpin (C) Jennings (C) Martisco (BID)
0 Beecher (C) Chagrin (B) Digby (B) Ginat (D) Johnsburg (D) Maumee (AID)
Belknap (C) Chalmers (BID) Door (B) Glenhall (B) Jules (B) McGary (C)
Belleville (BID) Chatterton (A) Dowagiac (B) Glynwood (C) Junius (C) Medora (B)
.0 Belmore (B) Cheektowaga (0) Driftwood (C/O) Gosport (C) Medway (B)
Berks (C) Chelsea (A) Drummer (B/O) Granby (AID) Mellott (B)
Bethesda (C) Chetwynd (8) Du Page (B) Gravelton (BID) Kalamazoo (B) Mermill (8ID)
Bewleyville (8) Cincinnati (C) Dubois (C) Grayford (8) Kendallville (8) Metamora (8)
D Billett (B) Clarence (D) Dunning (0) Griswold (8) . Kentland (AID) Met!a .
Birds (CID) Cleremont (0) Grovecity (8) Kerston (AID) ~lami
D Notes: 1. Two hydrologic soil groups shown together, such as B/C, indicate the drained/undrained conditions.
2. Any modifiers shown, e.g., bedrock substratum, refer to a specific soil series phase found in the soil
map legend. Chapter 3 - 17
D
D
o
o
o
o
D
D
o
D
D
D
D
D
D
o
D
D
D
o
o
Carmel. Indiana - 1422 Keystone Way
TR-55 Data
D
ID
D
D
o
o
o
D
D
o
D
o
U
D
o
o
o
D
U
Project : Donatos
County Hamilton
Subtitle: Existing
Subarea : Pre-1
TR-55 CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION
Pizza Carmel, Indiana User: Ben
State: In Checked:
Condition Curve Number & Tc Calculations
VERSION 1.11
Date:
Date:
COVER DESCRIPTION
A
Hydrologic Soil Group
BCD
Acres (CN)
FULLY DEVELOPED URBAN AREAS (Veg Estab.)
Open space (Lawns,parks etc.)
Good condition; grass cover > 75%
.02(61)
Impervious Areas
Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways
.5(98)
Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group)
.52
SUBAREA: Pre-1 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: .52 Acres
WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER:97
l
o
o
D
D
D
D
o
o
D
D
o
o
u
o
o
D
o
o
o
Project : Donatos
County Hamilton
Subtitle: Existing
Subarea : Pre-2
TR-55 CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION
Pizza Carmel, Indiana User: Ben
State: In Checked:
Condition Curve Number & Tc Calculations
VERSION 1.11
Date:
Date:
COVER DESCRIPTION
A
Hydrologic Soil Group
BCD
Acres (CN)
FULLY DEVELOPED URBAN AREAS (Veg Estab.)
Open space (Lawns,parks etc.)
Good condition; grass cover > 75%
.03(61)
Impervious Areas
Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways
.05(98)
Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group)
.08
SUBAREA: Pre-2 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: .08 Acres
WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER:84
D
u
u
u
o
D
o
D
o
o
o
D
U
D
D
U
o
U
I 0
I
Project : Donatos
County Hamilton
Subtitle: Existing
Subarea : Pre-3
TR-55 CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION
Pizza Carmel, Indiana User: Ben
State: In Checked:
Condition Curve Number & Tc Calculations
VERSION 1.11
Date:
Date:
COVER DESCRIPTION
A
Hydrologic Soil Group
BCD
Acres (CN)
FULLY DEVELOPED URBAN AREAS (Veg Estab.)
Open space (Lawns,parks etc.)
Good condition; grass cover > 75%
.016(61)
Impervious Areas
Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways
.324(98)
Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group)
.34
SUBAREA: Pre-3 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: .34 Acres
WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER:96
~
o
u
D
D
D
o
D
u
u
u
D
D
U
U
o
ID
D
U
D
TR-55 Tc and Tt THRU SUBAREA COMPUTATION
Project : Donatos Pizza Carmel, Indiana User: Ben
County Hamilton State: In Checked:
Subtitle: Existing Condition Curve Number & Tc Calculations
VERSION 1.11
Date:
Date:
Flow Type
Time
Length
------------------------------ Subarea #1 - Pre-1
n
Area
Velocity
2 year
rain
(ft)
(hr)
Sheet
0.040
Sheet
0.017
2.9
165
102
Slope Surface
(ft/ft)
code
Wp
(sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec)
Time of Concentration = 0.06*.:: 3.~ '"""".
~ ~M~
Flow Type
Time
Length
------------------------------ Subarea #2 - Pre-2
n
Area
Velocity
2 year
rain
(ft)
(hr)
Sheet
0.005
Sheet
0.016
2.9
25
87
.011
a
Wp
(sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec)
Time of Concentration = 0.02* ., I. Z A,tJ.
~ S- /'f~V
Flow Type
Time
Length
------------------------------ Subarea #3 - Pre-3
n
Area
Velocity
2 year
rain
(ft)
(hr)
Sheet
0.035
Sheet
0.004
2.9
209
19
--- Sheet Flow Surface
A Smooth Surface
B Fallow (No Res.)
C Cultivated < 20 % Res.
D Cultivated> 20 % Res.
E Grass-Range, Short
.034
a
Slope Surface
(ft/ft)
code
.04
a
.033
a
Slope Surface
(ft/ft)
code
.025
a
.039
a
Codes ---
F Grass, Dense
G Grass, Burmuda
H Woods, Light
I Woods, Dense
Wp
(sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec)
Time of Concentration = 0.04* tit 'Z.'! A~JoI.
c;$C. -~ ~
Shallow Concentrated
Surface Codes
P Paved
U Unpaved
u
U
D
o
D
o
U
D
U
o
D
U
U
D
U
U
U
o
ID
TR-55 CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION
Project : Donatos Pizza Carmel, Indiana User: Ben
County Hamilton State: In Checked:
Subtitle: Post Developed Curve Number & Tc Computations
Subarea : Postl
VERSION 1.11
Date:
Date:
COVER DESCRIPTION
A
Hydrologic Soil Group
BCD
Acres (CN)
FULLY DEVELOPED URBAN AREAS (Veg Estab.)
Impervious Areas
Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways
.29(98)
Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group)
.29
SUBAREA: Postl TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: .29 Acres
WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER:98
10
U
D
o
U
o
U
D
U
D
u
u
u
u
o
u
U
D
'0
I
TR-55 CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION
Project : Donatos Pizza Carmel, Indiana User: Ben
County Hamilton State: In Checked:
Subtitle: Post Developed Curve Number & Tc Computations
Subarea : Post2
VERSION 1.11
Date:
Date:
COVER DESCRIPTION
A
Hydrologic Soil Group
BCD
Acres (CN)
FULLY DEVELOPED URBAN AREAS (Veg Estab.)
Impervious Areas
Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways
.13(98)
Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group)
.13
SUBAREA: Post2 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: .13 Acres
WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER:98
D
u
U
D
D
U
o
D
U
D
D
o
U
U
D
U
o
D
U
TR-55 CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATION
Project : Donatos Pizza Carmel, Indiana User: Ben
County Hamilton State: In Checked:
Subtitle: Post Developed Curve Number & Tc Computations
Subarea : Post3
VERSION 1.11
Date:
Date:
COVER DESCRIPTION
A
Hydrologic Soil Group
BCD
Acres (CN)
FULLY DEVELOPED URBAN AREAS (Veg Estab.)
Impervious Areas
Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways
.22(98)
Total Area (by Hydrologic Soil Group)
.22
SUBAREA: Post3 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA: .22 Acres
WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER:98
D
U
D
D
D
U
o
D
U
D
o
[J
o
U
D
U
o
D
U
TR-55 Tc and Tt THRU SUBAREA COMPUTATION
Project : Donatos Pizza Carmel, Indiana User: Ben
County Hamilton State: In Checked:
Subtitle: Post Developed Curve Number & Tc Computations
VERSION 1.11
Date:
Date:
Flow Type
Time
Length
------------------------------ Subarea #1 - Post1
n
Area
Velocity
2 year
rain
(ft)
(hr)
Sheet
0.033
2.9
123
Slope Surface
(ft/ft)
code
Wp
(sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec)
Time of Concentration = 0.03* r /,6 ""'"
~--~ /'1'9
Flow Type
Time
Length
------------------------------ Subarea #2 - Post2
n
Area
Velocity
2 year
rain
(ft)
(hr)
Sheet
0.011
Sheet
0.030
2.9
43
115
.0.1
a
Wp
(sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec)
Time of Concentration = 0.04 * = e.'" /"f,N,
~--s- ;1,~
Flow Type
Time
Length
------------------------------ Subarea #3 - Post3
n
Area
Velocity
2 year
rain
(ft)
(hr)
Sheet
0.007
Sheet
0.036
2.9
25
135
--- Sheet Flow Surface
A Smooth Surface
B Fallow (No Res.)
C Cultivated < 20 % Res.
D Cultivated> 20 % Res.
E Grass-Range, Short
Slope Surface
(ft/ft)
code
.020
a
.011
a
Slope Surface
(ft/ft)
code
.017
a
.01
a
Codes ---
F Grass, Dense
G Grass, Burmuda
H Woods, Light
I Woods, Dense
Wp
(sq/ft) (ft) (ft/sec)
Time of Concentration = 0.04* = ~.C( /'1'N.
~E ~ ;4i/~
Shallow Concentrated
Surface Codes
P Paved
U Unpaved
U
Carmel. Indiana - 1422 Kevstone Way
U
D
o
10
U
,0
U WATERWORKS Data
U
D
o
D
U
o
o
D
I '
o
U
D
u
u
u
3/26/01 page
DOHATOS PIZZA CAJUlEL, INDIANA
STORIIIIATER IWIAGEIlEIlT SYSTEM STUDY
EXISTING CONDITIONS 10YR/1HR
...~..=Og..oa....~_ao....._._.___._._..._........DO..___.._._..__._
DETAIL BASIN StlMHARY
BASIN 10: PRE-1 RAKE: EXISTING 10YR/IRR
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA.......: 0.52 Acres BASEFLOliS : 0.00 efs
RAINFALL TYPE....: BUFFl PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION. . . . : 2.08 1nehes AREA..: 0.52 Acres 0.00 Aeres
TIME INTERVAL....: 1.00 m1n eN.. ..: 97.00 0.00
TC....: 5.00 m1n 0.00 m1n
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAK RATE: 1. 75 efs VOL: 0.07 Ae-ft TIME: 21 m1n
TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN
RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF
(m1n) (efs) (m1n) (efs) (m1nl (ets) (m1nl (efs) (m1n) (efs) (m1n) (etsl
____..__.___._____..__~__._....=_=.___aG8________.__._._.__._.________.__.__..=-__._._=-=a____.~_.__
1 31 1. 4554 61 0.3246 91 121 151
2 32 1. 3383 62 0.2209 92 122 152
3 0.0003 33 1. 2104 63 0.1321 93 123 153
4 0.0041 34 1. 0972 64 0.0752 94 124 154
5 0.0202 35 1.0074 65 0.0424 95 125 155
6 0.0578 36 0.9391 66 0.0223 96 126 156
7 0.1194 37 0.8874 67 0.0100 97 127 157
8 0.2002 38 0.8473 68 0.0025 98 128 158
9 0.2914 39 0.8159 69 99 129 159
10 0.4026 40 0.7941 70 100 130 160
11 0.5493 41 0.7793 71 101 131 161
12 0.7127 42 0.7678 72 102 132 162
13 0.8723 43 0.7576 73 103 133 163
14 1. 0185 44 0.7459 74 104 134 164
15 1.1483 45 0.7341 75 105 135 165
16 1. 2788 46 0.7264 76 106 136 166
17 1. 4287 47 0.7247 77 107 137 167
18 1. 5780 48 0.7250 78 108 138 168
19 1. 6886 49 0.7140 79 109 139 169
20 1. 7387 50 0.6809 80 110 140 170
21 1. 7499 51 0.6380 81 111 141 171
22 1. 7425 52 0.6013 82 112 142 172
23 1.7240 53 0.5777 83 113 143 173
24 1. 7030 54 0.5630 84 114 144 174
25 1.6837 55 0.5456 85 115 145 175
26 1. 6699 56 0.5170 86 116 146 176
27 1. 6600 57 0.4847 87 117 147 177
28 1. 6396 58 0.4601 88 118 148 178
29 1. 5946 59 0.4443 89 119 149 179
30 1.5355 60 0.4082 90 120 150 180
D
ID
D
D
D
u
o
o
u
o
o
o
u
u
u
D
u
o
u
3/26/01 paqe
DONATOS PIZZA CARIlEL, INDIANA
STORMIIATER MAllAGEMENT SYSTEM STUDY
EXISTING CONDITIONS 10YR/1BR
____.____.a............D....__.._.__._......~....__...._._aD..._....
DETAIL BASIN StlIlKARy
BASIN 10: PRE-2 !lAKE: EXISTING 10YR/1BR
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA.......: 0.08 Acres BASEFLONS : 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TyPE....: HUFF 1 PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION.... : 2.08 inches AREA..: 0.08 Acres 0.00 Acres
TIME INTERVAL....: 1.00 min eN....: 84.00 0.00
TC.... : 5.00 min 0.00 mill
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.13 cfs VOL: 0.01 Ac-ft TIME: 29 min
TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN
RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF
(min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (efs) (min) (efs) (mill) (efs)
........==.............==......__...._=........DQ......................=.==-.oa......==.................
1 31 0.1259 61 0.0363 91 121 151
2 32 0.1185 62 0.0247 92 122 152
3 33 0.1094 63 0.0148 93 123 153
4 34 0.1010 64 0.0084 94 124 154
5 35 0.0943 65 0.0048 95 125 155
6 36 0.0893 66 0.0025 96 126 156
7 37 0.0855 67 0.0011 97 127 157
8 38 0.0826 68 0.0003 98 128 158
9 39 0.0804 69 99 129 159
10 40 0.0791 70 100 130 160
11 41 0.0783 71 101 131 161
12 42 0.0778 72 102 132 162
13 0.0006 43 0.0774 73 103 133 163
14 0.0028 44 0.0768 74 104 134 164
15 0.0079 45 0.0762 75 105 135 165
16 0.0167 46 0.0759 76 106 136 166
17 0.0291 47 0.0762 77 107 137 167
18 0.0439 48 0.0768 78 108 138 168
19 0.0588 49 0.0761 79 109 139 169
20 0.0718 50 0.0729 80 110 140 170
21 0.0829 51 0.0687 81 111 141 171
22 0.0925 52 0.0651 82 112 142 172
23 0.1004 53 0.0628 83 113 143 173
24 0.1073 54 0.0615 84 114 144 174
25 O. 1135 55 0.0599 85 115 145 175
26 0.1194 56 0.0570 86 116 146 176
27 0.1248 57 0.0536 87 117 147 177
28 0.1287 58 0.0511 88 118 148 178
29 0.1298 59 0.0495 89 119 149 179
30 0.1292 60 0.0456 90 120 150 180
o
u
u
u
u
o
o
o
D
u
u
D
u
u
lJ
D
u
u
D
3/26/01 page 3
DONATOS PIZZA CARMEL, INDIANA
STOJOOlATER IlANAGEMENT SYSTEM STUDY.
EXISTING CONDITIONS 10YR/IHR
...IiI..aaa.__....._..___.....___.__.......g...a.......__...___.._IiI............
DETAIL BASIN SUHHARY
BASIN ID: PRE-3 NAME: EXISTING 10YR/IHR
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA.......: 0.34 Acres BASEFLOllS: 0.00 efs
RAINFALL TyPE....: BUFFl PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION.... : 2.08 inches AREA..: 0.34 Acres 0.00 Acres
TIME INTERVAL....: 1.00 min CN.... : 96.00 0.00
TC.... : 5.00 IIlin 0.00 IIlin
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAl< RATE: 1.08 ets VOL: 0.05 Ae-ft TIME: 22 IIlin
TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN
RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF
(IIlin) (ets) (IIlin) (efs) (IIlin) lefs) llllin) lets) (IIlin) (efs) (IIlin) (ets)
a...._D=_aaa=oo___aa=_aaaaoa=aoaaea..a_Daa__aDD_===aaa=aaaa.a..a..............___a..a__a.a.=liIaa......aaa
1 31 0.9260 61 0.2095 91 121 151
2 32 0.8527 62 0.1426 92 122 152
3 33 0.7722 63 0.0853 93 123 153
4 0.0002 34 0.7007 64 0.0485 94 124 154
5 0.0028 35 0.6440 65 0.0274 95 125 155
6 0.0130 36 0.6009 66 0.0144 96 126 156
7 0.0363 37 0.5682 67 0.0065 97 127 157
8 0.0740 38 0.5429 68 0.0016 98 128 158
9 0.1223 39 0.5231 69 99 129 159
10 0.1854 40 0.5094 70 100 130 160
11 0.2708 41 0.5001 71 101 131 161
12 0.3687 42 0.4930 72 102 132 162
13 0.4680 43 0.4867 73 103 133 163
14 0.5627 44 0.4794 74 104 134 164
15 0.6498 45 0.4720 75 105 135 165
16 0.7384 46 0.4672 76 106 136 166
17 0.8393 47 0.4663 77 107 137 167
18 0.9402 48 0.4666 78 108 138 168
19 1. 0177 49 0.4597 79 109 139 169
20 1. 0578 50 0.4385 80 110 140 170
21 1.0731 51 0.4110 81 III 141 171
22 1. 07 58 52 0.3875 82 112 142 172
23 1. 0704 53 0.3723 83 113 143 173
24 1. 0626 54 0.3630 84 114 144 174
25 1. 0550 55 0.3518 85 115 145 175
26 1. 0502 56 0.3335 86 116 146 176
27 1. 04 73 57 0.3127 87 117 147 177
28 1. 0371 58 0.2969 88 118 148 178
29 1.0110 59 0.2867 89 119 149 179
30 0.9754 60 0.2635 90 120 150 180
D
u
u
u
~J
U
o
D
D
o
D
u
o
u
[J
D
o
u
o
D
3/26/01 page
DONATOS PIZZA CA1UlEL, INDIANA
STORMIIATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEK REPORT
POST DEVELOPED 10YR/IHR
_____c=_____a8RD==_aRD=R8DD_=-__maa.._.._--=_aDD8._aaa____-=__a_a.___
DETAIL BASIN SUIlHARY
BASIN ID: POST110 NAME: POST DEVELOPED 10YR/1HR
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA.......: 0.29 Acres BASEFLOllS : 0.00 ets
RAINFALL TypE....: HUFF1 PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION....: 2.08 inehes AREA..: 0.29 Acres 0.00 Acres
TIME INTERVAL....: 1.00 min CN....: 98.00 0.00
TC... .: 5.00 min 0.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAK RATE: 1. 03 efs VOL: 0.04 Ae-ft TIME: 20 min
TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN
RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF
(min) (ets) (min) (ets) (min) (ets) (min) (ets) (min) (ets) (min) (ets)
_~=_==_._.__O__=gg.DD~~_____________a_____=._aa~_==._.~.aaD___~_._aa__.a_a._.__.
1 31 0.8295 61 0.1828 91 121 151
2 0.0001 32 0.7619 62 0.1244 92 122 152
3 0.0021 33 0.6884 63 0.0744 93 123 153
4 0.0122 34 0.6234 64 0.0423 94 124 154
5 0.0375 35 0.5719 65 0.0239 95 125 155
6 0.0779 36 0.5327 66 0.0126 96 126 156
7 0.1290 37 0.5031 67 0.0057 97 127 157
8 0.1861 38 0.4801 68 0.0014 98 128 158
9 0.2444 39 0.4620 69 99 129 159
10 0.3122 40 0.4495 70 100 130 160
11 0.4004 41 0.4409 71 101 131 161
12 0.4963 42 0.4343 72 102 132 162
13 o . 5860 43 0.4283 73 103 133 163
14 0.6646 44 0.4216 74 104 134 164
15 0.7318 45 0.4148 75 105 135 165
16 0.7989 46 0.4103 76 106 136 166
17 0.8775 47 0.4092 77 107 137 167
18 0.9559 48 0.4093 78 108 138 168
19 1.0116 49 0.4030 79 109 139 169
20 1. 0322 50 0.3842 80 110 140 170
21 1. 0311 51 0.3599 81 111 141 171
22 1. 0203 52 0.3391 82 112 142 172
23 1. 0042 53 0.3257 83 113 143 173
24 0.9876 54 0.3174 84 114 144 174
25 0.9726 55 0.3075 85 115 145 175
26 0.9615 56 0.2914 86 116 146 176
27 0.9532 57 0.2731 87 117 147 177
28 0.9393 58 0.2592 88 118 148 178
29 0.9117 59 0.2503 89 119 149 179
30 0.8764 60 0.2299 90 120 150 180
u
u
o
u
o
D
u
o
D
u
D
D
o
D
u
D
D
o
D
3/26/01 paqe 2
DONATOS PIZZA CARHEL, INDIANA
STOIOOlATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REPORT
POST DEVELOPED 10YR/IHR
......DDc.1Za=.gll:l==__o==aoz==_==...=...,.......DG.......""'..1Z........__=lIag...."'a=......
DETAIL BASIN SUIlKARY
BASIN ID: POST210 1WlE: POST DEVELOPED 10YR/IHR
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA.......: 0.13 Aeres BASEFLOlIS: 0.00 ets
RAINFALL TYPE....: HUFFl PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION. . . . : 2.08 inehes AREA..: 0.13 Aeres 0.00 Aeres
TIME INTERVAL....: 1. 00 min CN....: 98.00 0.00
TC.... : 5.00 min 0.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.46 efs VOL: 0.02 Ae-tt TIME: 20 min
TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN
RUNOFF RtlNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF
(min) (ets) (min) lefs) (min) lefs) (min) (efs) lmin) lefs) (min) (efs)
......=_=D=......==aa==IlIC1aa==_.a...a=....a...""allla..aa:llllll........a.........a:lllaalll......aaDD...=a...............:I:I:III.....a____D=-....a..DClCI:IIIaaaaClClCll...
1 31 0.3718 61 0.0820 91 121 151
2 32 0.3415 62 0.0558 92 122 152
3 0.0010 33 0.3086 63 0.0333 93 123 153
4 0.0055 34 0.2795 64 0.0190 94 124 154
5 0.0168 35 0.2564 65 0.0107 95 125 155
6 0.0349 36 0.2388 66 0.0056 96 126 156
7 0.0578 37 0.2255 67 0.0025 97 127 157
8 0.0834 38 0.2152 68 0.0006 98 128 158
9 0.1096 39 0.2071 69 99 129 159
10 0.1399 40 0.2015 70 100 130 160
11 0.1195 41 O. 1977 11 101 131 161
12 0.2225 42 0.1947 72 102 132 162
13 0.2627 43 0.1920 73 103 133 163
14 0.2979 44 0.1890 14 104 134 164
15 0.3281 45 0.1859 75 105 135 165
16 0.3581 46 0.1839 76 106 136 166
17 0.3934 47 0.1834 77 107 137 167
18 0.4285 48 0.1835 78 108 138 168
19 0.4535 49 0.1806 79 109 139 169
20 0.4627 50 0.1722 80 110 140 170
21 0.4622 51 0.1613 81 III 141 111
22 0.4574 52 0.1520 82 112 142 172
23 0.4501 53 0.1460 83 113 143 173
24 0.4427 54 0.1423 84 114 144 174
25 0.4360 55 0.1379 85 115 145 175
26 0.4310 56 0.1306 86 116 146 176
27 0.4273 57 0.1224 87 117 147 177
28 0.4210 58 O. 1162 88 118 148 178
29 0.4087 59 0.1122 89 119 149 179
30 0.3929 60 0.1031 90 120 150 180
u
u
D
u
D
D
o
u
u
o
o
o
[J
D
o
u
D
u
D
3/26/01 page
DONATOS PIZZA CARMEL, INDIANA
STORMWATER MAIlAGEMENT SYSTEM REPORT
POST DEVELOPED 10YR/IHR
.________.aDa__.___o_____...aa.l:ilo':O........IiID____.......__c......aDD._a__a_=_a._
DETAIL BASIN StlHIlARy
BASIN 10: POST310 NAME: POST DEVELOPED 10YR/1HR
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA.......: 0.22 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cts
RAINFALL TyPE....: HUFF1 PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION.... : 2.08 inches AREA..: 0.22 Acres 0.00 Acres
TIME INTERVAL....: 1. 00 min CN.... : 98.00 0.00
TC.... : 5.00 min 0.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.78 cts VOL: 0.03 Ac-tt TIME: 20 miD
TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN
RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF
(min) (cts) (min) (cts) lmin) lcts) (min) (cts) lmin) lcts) (miD) lcts)
._.....____________..____._________...__________.ag__OD_o______________~___________________._____._____
1 31 0.6293 61 0.1387 91 121 151
2 0.0001 32 0.5780 62 0.0944 92 122 152
3 0.0016 33 0.5222 63 0.0564 93 123 153
4 0.0092 34 0.4729 64 0.0321 94 124 154
5 0.0284 35 0.4338 65 0.0181 95 125 155
6 0.0591 36 0.4042 66 0.0095 96 126 156
7 0.0978 37 0.3817 67 0.0043 97 127 157
8 0.1412 38 0.3642 68 0.0011 98 128 158
9 0.1854 39 0.3505 69 99 129 159
10 0.2368 40 0.3410 70 100 130 160
11 0.3038 41 0.3345 71 101 131 161
12 0.3765 42 0.3295 72 102 132 162
13 0.4446 43 0.3250 73 103 133 163
14 0.5042 44 0.3198 74 104 134 164
15 0.5552 45 0.3147 75 105 135 165
16 0.6061 46 0.3113 76 106 136 166
17 0.6657 47 0.3104 77 107 137 167
18 0.7252 48 0.3105 78 108 138 168
19 0.7674 49 0.3057 79 109 139 169
20 0.7831 50 0.2914 80 110 140 170
21 0.7822 51 0.2730 81 III 141 171
22 0.7740 52 0.2573 82 112 142 172
23 0.7618 53 0.2471 83 113 143 173
24 0.7492 54 0.2408 84 114 144 174
25 0.7379 55 0.2333 85 115 145 175
26 0.7294 56 0.2211 86 116 146 176
27 0.7231 57 0.2072 87 117 147 177
28 0.7125 58 0.1967 88 118 148 178
29 0.6916 59 0.1899 89 119 149 179
30 0.6649 60 0.1744 90 120 150 1eO
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
o
D
o
D
D
D
D
u
o
D
3/26/01 page
DONATOS PIZZA CARMEL, INDIANA
STOIOOlATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REPORT
POST DEVELOPED 10YR/IHR
______.DDD_.._..._..____D_=.~...____..__.....__.=..D....__._D....._.
DETAIL HYDROGRAPH SllMHARY
HYDROGRAPH No. 1
Peak runoff: 2.2172 ets Total Vol: 0.10 ae-ft
TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN
RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF
(min) (ets) (min) (ets) (min) (ets) (min) (efs) (min) (ets)
______.___.......___...._____.__.........._=-_aa....aa__.____..C8...._.___________aa___
1 41 0.9855 81 121 161
2 0.0001 42 0.9680 82 122 162
3 0.0018 43 0.9539 83 123 163
4 0.0123 44 0.9402 84 124 164
5 0.0461 45 0.9252 85 125 165
6 0.1134 46 0.9120 86 126 166
7 0.2106 47 0.9047 87 127 167
8 0.3280 48 0.9031 88 128 168
9 0.4549 49 0.8984 89 129 169
10 0.5908 50 0.8750 90 130 170
11 0.7559 51 0.8294 91 131 171
12 o . 95 64 52 0.1785 92 132 172
13 1.1633 53 0.7383 93 133 173
14 1. 3529 54 0.7126 94 134 174
15 1.5117 55 0.6930 95 135 175
16 1. 6660 56 0.6664 96 136 176
17 1. 822 8 57 0.6292 97 137 117
18 1. 9961 58 0.5922 98 138 178
19 2.1518 59 0.5653 99 139 179
20 2.2482 60 0.5369 100 140 180
21 2.2772 61 0.4717 101 141 181
22 2.2674 62 0.3592 102 142 182
23 2.2395 63 0.2366 103 143 183
24 2.2035 64 0.1398 104 144 184
25 2.1681 65 0.0794 105 145 185
26 2.1381 66 0.0441 106 146 186
27 2.1156 67 0.0225 107 147 187
28 2.0930 68 0.0093 108 148 188
29 2.0520 69 0.0021 109 149 189
30 1.9853 70 110 150 190
31 1. 8986 71 111 151 191
32 1.1793 72 112 152 192
33 1. 6256 73 113 153 193
34 1. 4699 74 114 154 194
35 1.3367 75 115 155 195
36 1.2324 76 116 156 196
37 1.1532 17 117 157 197
38 1. 0928 78 118 158 198
39 1. 0458 79 119 159 199
40 1.0102 80 120 160 200
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
o
D
D
D
D
D
D
u
D
3/26/01
page
5
D
DONATOS PIZZA CARMEL, INDIANA
STOlOOlATER MAIlAGEMENT SYSTEK REPORT
POST DEVELOPED 10YRIIHR
..__.....IlICI........_a..a...gg_a......-=......g...............aa................a.alIIaa...a.........a......
D
REACH SllHMARY
PIPE REACH ID No. IlI2
From: Il To: 12
Pipe Diameter: 1. 00 ft n: 0.0130
Pipe Len9th 113.31 ft s: 0.0050
Up invert 822.62 ft down invert: 821. 76 ft
Collection Area: 0.29 Ac.
Design Flow 1. 03 cfs Dsgn Depth: 0.55 ft
Pipe Capacity 2.71 cfs
Design Vel 3.05 fps Travel Time: 0.95 min
Pipe Full Vel 3.54 fps
PIPE REACH ID No. 1214
From: 12 To: 14
Pipe Diameter: 1. 00 ft n: 0.0130
Pipe Length 53.78 ft s: 0.0048
Up invert 821. 76 ft down invert: 821.50 ft
Collection Area: 0.42 Ac.
Design Flow 1. 49 cfs Dsgn Depth: o . 56ft
Pipe Capacity 2.67 cfs
Design Vel 3.31 fps Travel Time: 0.27 min
Pipe Full Vel 3.49 fps
PIPE REACH ID No. 1314
From: 13 To: 14
Pipe Diameter: 1. 00 ft n: 0.0130
Pipe Length 38.08 ft s: 0.0047
Up invert 821.68 ft down invert: 821. 50 ft
Collection Area: 0.22 Ac.
Design Flow 0.78 cfs Dsgn Depth: 0.61 ft
Pipe Capacity 2.64 cfs
Design Vel 2.78 fps Travel Time: 0.23 min
Pipe Full Vel 3.45 fps
PI PE REACH 10 No. 1415
From: 14 To: IS
Pipe Diameter: 1. 00 ft n: 0.0130
Pipe Length 20.56 ft s: 0.0866
Up invert 821. 50 ft down invert: 819.72 ft
Collection Area 0.64 Ac.
Design Flow 2.28 cfs Dsgn Depth: o . 32 ft
Pipe Capacity 11. 31 cfs
Design Vel 10.69 fps Travel Time: 0.03 min
Pipe Full Vel 14.77 fps
D
D
o
D
D
o
D
o
D
o
D
o
D
o
o
D
D
3/26/01
page
DONATOS PIZZA CARHEL, INDIANA
STORHIIATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REPORT
POST DEVELOPED 10YR/IHR
D
REACH StlMKARy
D
Network Reach NORTH
REACH <-AREA> <-DIA> LENGTH SLOPE < n > DSGN Q' PIPE Ndepth 'Depth Vact Vfu11 C Area
ID lAc) 1ft) (ft) ft/ft ------ (ch) ------ (ft) ------ (fpsl (fps)-
___._g________________-==-____.gg____________....._.__aaa..__________aa____s___________..__=-_=-_
1314
0.22 1.00
38.08 0.0047 0.0130
0.78 29.64 0.61 61.19 2.78
3.45 POST310
D
Network Reach SOUTH
REACH <-AREA> <-DIA> LENGTH SLOPE < n > DSGN Q' PIPE Ndepth 'Depth Vact Vfu11 C Area
10 lAc) (ftl (ft) ft/ft ------ (ch) ------ (ft) ------ (fps) (fps)-
D
1112 0.29 1.00 173.31 0.0050 0.0130
1214 0.42 1.00 53.78 0.0048 0.0130
Confluence with Network NORTH
1415 0.64 1.00 20.56 0.0866 0.0130
1.03 38.13 0.55 55.39 3.05 3.54 POST 11 0
1.49 55.95 0.56 55.94 3.31 3.49 POST210
2.28 20.14 0.32 31.61 10.69 14.77
D
LJ
D
D
D
o
o
o
o
D
D
D
D
D
o
3/26/01
DOHATOS PIZZA CARMEL, INDIANA
STORMIIATER KANAGEI!ENT SYSTEM REPORT
POST DEVELOPED 10YR/IHR
D
STRUCTURE REPORT
EXISTING STRUCTURE REACH
o
ID No. Il
page 1
Location : IiEST AREA INLET North 5544.1300
Str Type : A-MOD East 8260.6100
Str Cat Catch Basin Rim E1 ev 824.8100
Area/sump: 4.00 sf/O.OO ft Bottom E1: 822.6200
Cont Area: POSTllO Hgrade E1: 0.0000 ft
Bend.... .: No special shape
Ent type.: Area/sump:
Ent Loss: 0.000 Exit: 0.000 App Vel: 0.000 Junct: 0.000 Bend: 0.000
o
Reach <Invert> <Diam> < n > <End>
IlI2 822.620 12.00 0.013 Upper
D
PROPOSED STRUCTURE REACH
10 No. 12
D
Location :
Str Type :
Str Cat
Area/sump:
Cont Area:
Bend..... :
Ent type.:
Ent Loss:
o
Reach
IlI2
1214
SOUTH CURB INLET
J-BOX CURB INLET
Catch Basin
6.00 sf/O.OO ft
P05T210
No special shape
Area/sump:
0.000 Exit: 0.000 App Vel:
<Invert>
821.160
821.160
<Diam>
12.00
12.00
< n >
0.013
0.013
o
PROPOSED STRUCTURE REACH
10 No. 13
o
Location :
Str Type :
Str Cat
Area/sump:
Cont Area:
Bend. . ... :
Ent type.:
Ent Loss:
NORTHEAST CURB INLET
J-BOX CURB INLET
Catch Basin
6.00 sf/O.OO ft
POST310
No special shape
Area/sump:
0.000 Exit: 0.000 App Vel:
D
Reach <Invert> <Diam> < n > <End>
1314 821.680 12.00 0.013 Upper
D
D
D
D
o
o
D
u
North
East
Rim Elev
Bottom E1:
Hgrade E1:
0.000 Junct:
<End>
Lower
Upper
North
East
Rim E1 ev
Bottom E1:
Hgrade E1:
0.000 Junct:
5492.8900
8426.2300
824.2200
821.1600
0.0000 ft
0.000 Bend: 0.000
5519.1400
8453.8900
824.6900
821. 6800
0.0000 ft
0.000 Bend: 0.000
u
D
3/26/01
DONATOS PIZZA CARMEL, INDIANA
STORHIIATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REPORT
POST DEVELOPED 10YR/IHR
u
STRUCTURE REPORT
PROPOSED STRUCTURE REACH
D
Location :
Str Type :
Str Cat
Area/sump:
Cont Area:
Bend..... :
Ent type.:
Ent Loss:
D
D
Reacb
1214
1314
1415
ID No. 14
JUNCTION STRUCTURE
A-KOD BOX
Catcb Basin
4.00 sf/O.OO ft
No special sbape
Area/sump:
0.000 Exit: 0.000 APP Vel:
<Invert>
821. 500
821.500
821.500
<Diam>
12.00
12.00
12.00
< n >
0.013
0.013
0.013
PROPOSED STRUCTURE REACH
o
Location :
Str Type :
Str Cat
Area/sump:
Cont Area:
Bend..... :
Ent type.:
Ent Loss:
D
ID No. 15
REPLACEMENT FOR EX. INLET
A-KOD
Catcb Basin
4.00 sf/O.OO ft
No special sbape
Area/sump:
0.000 Exit: 0.000 APP Vel:
Reacb <Invert> <Diam> < n > <End>
1415 819.720 12.00 0.013 Lower
D
D
D
o
D
u
D
D
D
D
D
Nortb
East
Rim El ev
Bottom El:
Hqr ade El:
0.000 Junct:
<End>
Lower
Lower
Upper
Nortb
East
Rim Elev
Bottom El:
Hqrade El:
0.000 Junct:
paqe
5541. 3000
8449.6600
825.0000
821. 5000
0.0000 ft
0.000 Bend: 0.000
5535.2100
8469.3000
825.0000
819.7200
0.0000 ft
0.000 Bend: 0.000
D
u
D
3/26/01 paqe
DONAT OS PIZZA CARMEL, INDIANA
STORMIIATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM STUDY
EXISTING CONDITIONS 100YR/IHR
_1IIlI_.llIl1:1..aO..=_Ol::loaOCl__lIIlIl;IlGa....=_a_aDaIllDa_.a_=..___aaaa.....CI===I:IO..==_
DETAIL BASIN SllMHARY
BASIN 10: PRE-l NAME: EXISTING COND. 100YR/IHR
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA.......: 0.52 Acres BASEFLOlIS : 0.00 ets
RAINFALL TyPE....: HUFF 1 PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION. . . . : 3.07 inches AREA..: 0.52 Acres 0.00 Acres
TIME INTERVAL....: 1. 00 min CN.... : 97.00 0.00
TC.... : 5.00 min 0.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAK RATE: 2.72 efs VOL: 0.12 Ae-ft TIME: 20 min
TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN
RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF
(min) (efs) (minI lets) (min) lefs) lmin) lets) lmin) lets) (min) lets)
___.__Dd_aDD.D___IlI__aIllO_IlI.__IIIlI_D.D_==_a_IlIIl1_Q__....~_a__a..____...aGalaaKaa____IlIDaao...a....IlI__=......._Q.........
1 31 2.1931 61 0.4837 91 121 151
2 0.0003 32 2.0145 62 0.3291 92 122 152
3 0.0050 33 1. 8202 63 0.1968 93 123 153
4 0.0297 34 1. 6485 64 0.1120 94 124 154
5 0.0936 35 1. 5123 65 0.0632 95 125 155
6 0.1974 36 1.4089 66 0.0332 96 126 156
7 0.3303 37 1.3305 67 0.0150 97 127 157
8 0.4800 38 1.2696 68 0.0038 98 128 158
9 0.6335 39 1.2220 69 99 129 159
10 0.8123 40 1.1888 70 100 130 160
11 1. 0454 41 1.1662 71 101 131 161
12 1.2987 42 1.1486 72 102 132 162
13 1. 5365 43 1.1329 73 103 133 163
14 1. 7452 44 1.1151 74 104 134 164
15 1. 9240 45 1.0972 75 105 135 165
16 2.1027 46 1. 0853 76 106 136 166
17 2.3115 47 1. 0824 77 107 137 167
18 2.5197 48 1.0826 78 108 138 168
19 2.6681 49 1. 0659 79 109 139 169
20 2.7238 50 1. 0 162 80 110 140 170
21 2.7219 51 0.9520 81 III 141 171
22 2.6942 52 0.8971 82 112 142 172
23 2.6522 53 0.8617 83 113 143 173
24 2.6089 54 0.8396 84 114 144 174
25 2.5700 55 0.8135 85 115 145 175
26 2.5409 56 0.7708 86 116 146 176
27 2.5192 57 0.7226 87 117 147 177
28 2.4828 58 0.6857 88 118 148 178
29 2.4102 59 0.6621 89 119 149 179
30 2.3171 60 0.6083 90 120 150 180
D
D
D
D
u
D
o
o
o
D
D
o
o
D
D
o
o
D
D
3/26/01 page 2
DONATOS PIZZA CARHEL, INDIANA
STORl!llATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM STUDY
EXISTING CONDITIONS 100YR/1BR
.....a..DDIiiI_..=.______..g.....a..a.....CI...'IilJO..slll.c......Cla=.a.DDD__Da..._...=-
DETAIL BASIN SUIlIlARY
BASIN 10: PRE-2 NAME: EXISTING COND. 100YR/1BR
SCS lIETBODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA.... . . . : 0.08 Aeres BASEFLOlIS: 0.00 efs
RAINFALL TyPE....: BUFF1 PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION. .. . : 3.07 inehes AREA..: 0.08 Acres 0.00 Aeres
TIllE INTERVAL....: 1. 00 min CN.... : 84.00 0.00
TC.... : 5.00 min 0.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.25 efs VOL: 0.01 Ae-tt TIllE: 28 min
TIllE DESIGN TIllE DESIGN TIllE DESIGN TIllE DESIGN TIllE DESIGN TIllE DESIGN
RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF
(min) (ets) (min) (efs) (min) (ets) (min) (ets) (min) (efs) (minI (ets)
....D......a......______o.............................__......___...=a.o..III_=.........==.=.......==........._=_...___.......____
1 31 0.2374 61 0.0618 91 121 151
2 32 0.2214 62 0.0421 92 122 152
3 33 0.2027 63 0.0252 93 123 153
4 34 0.1859 64 0.0143 94 124 154
5 35 0.1724 65 0.0081 95 125 155
6 36 0.1622 66 0.0043 96 126 156
7 37 0.1545 67 0.0019 97 127 157
8 38 0.1486 68 0.0005 98 128 158
9 39 0.1440 69 99 129 159
10 0.0003 40 0.1410 70 100 130 160
11 0.0024 41 0.1392 71 101 131 161
12 0.0085 42 0.1378 72 102 132 162
13 0.0201 43 O. 1367 73 103 133 163
14 0.0368 44 0.1352 74 104 134 164
15 0.0569 45 0.1336 75 105 135 165
16 0.0803 46 0.1328 76 106 136 166
17 0.1080 47 0.1330 77 107 137 167
18 0.1376 48 0.1336 78 108 138 168
19 0.1646 49 0.1321 79 109 139 169
20 0.1853 50 0.1263 80 110 140 170
21 0.2009 51 0.1188 81 111 141 171
22 0.2130 52 0.1123 82 112 142 172
23 0.2222 53 0.1082 83 113 143 173
24 0.2298 54 0.1057 84 114 144 174
25 0.2364 55 0.1027 85 115 145 175
26 0.2428 56 0.0976 86 116 146 176
27 0.2488 57 0.0917 87 117 147 177
28 0.2521 58 0.0872 88 118 148 178
29 0.2507 59 0.0844 89 119 149 179
30 0.2462 60 0.0776 90 120 150 180
o
o
D
u
D
D
o
u
o
D
D
D
D
D
u
u
D
D
3/26/01 page
DONATOS PIZZA CARMEL, INDIANA
STOlOOlATER I!AlIAGEMEIlT SYSTEM STUDY
EXISTING CONDITIONS 100YR/IHR
..__..___caaa..IiI__=-=aac...a...=___....__=__........ga.llla......a.o:a1Ct_e_a==_a==
DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY
BASIN ID: PRE-3 NAME: EXISTING COND. 100YR/lRa
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA.......: 0.34 Acres BASEFLONS: 0.00 efs
RAINFALL TyPE....: HUFFl PERY IMP
PRECIPITATION.. . . : 3.07 inches AREA..: 0.34 Acres 0.00 Acres
TIME INTERVAL....: 1. 00 min CN.... : 96.00 0.00
TC.... : 5.00 min 0.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAK RATE: 1. 71 efs YOL: 0.07 Ac-ft TIME: 21 min
TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN
RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF
(min) (efs) (min) (efs) (min) (efs) (min) (efs) (min) (efs) (min) (efs)
-----....-_~_=-..=__a=._a____..=a_..___._=._.._~a..._a..=______=__..__=_a__=__.__.__~.____.._______._______.__
1 31 1. 4131 61 0.3142 91 121 151
2 32 1. 2990 62 0.2137 92 122 152
3 0.0005 33 1.1746 63 0.1278 93 123 153
4 0.0061 34 1. 064 4 64 0.0727 94 124 154
5 0.0271 35 0.9771 65 0.0411 95 125 155
6 0.0709 36 0.9107 66 0.0216 96 126 156
7 0.1374 37 0.8604 67 0.0097 97 127 157
8 0.2210 38 0.8213 68 0.0025 98 128 158
9 0.3128 39 0.7908 69 99 129 159
10 0.4232 40 0.7696 70 100 130 160
11 0.5683 41 0.7551 71 101 131 161
12 0.7287 42 0.7440 72 102 132 162
13 0.8838 43 0.7340 73 103 133 163
14 1.0243 44 0.7226 74 104 134 164
15 1.1479 45 0.7111 75 105 135 165
16 1.2119 46 0.7036 76 106 136 166
17 1.4148 47 0.7019 77 107 137 167
18 1.5570 48 0.7021 78 108 138 168
19 1.6614 49 0.6914 79 109 139 169
20 1.7067 50 O. 6592 80 110 140 170
21 1. 7143 51 0.6177 81 111 141 171
22 1.7042 52 0.5821 82 112 142 172
23 1. 6837 53 0.5593 83 113 143 173
24 1. 6613 54 0.5450 84 114 144 174
25 1. 6408 55 0.5281 85 115 145 175
26 1. 6259 56 0.5005 86 116 146 176
27 1. 6151 57 0.4692 87 117 147 177
28 1. 5942 58 0.4453 88 118 148 178
29 1. 5497 59 0.4300 89 119 149 179
30 1.4915 60 0.3951 90 120 150 180
D
D
o
D
o
o
o
D
o
o
u
D
D
o
D
D
D
D
u
u
3/26/01 paqe
DONATOS PI ZZA CAlUlEL, INDIANA
STORMIlATER IlAIIAGEMEIlT SYSTEM STUDY
POST DEVELOPED 100YRIIBR
_-=-_-=-.______.~_~___aa___.D8_.___.__=.___.______s_._==______._
DETAIL BASIN StlMMARy
BASIN ID: POST1100 NAME: POST DEVELOPED 100YR/1BR
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA.......: 0.29 Acres BASEFLONS: 0.00 ets
RAINFALL TyPE....: BUFFl PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION.... : 3.07 inches AREA..: 0.29 Acres 0.00 Aeres
TIME INTERVAL....: 1.00 min CN.... : 98.00 0.00
TC.... : 5.00 min 0.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAK RATE: 1. 57 ets VOL: 0.07 Ac-ft TIME: 20 min
TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN
RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF
(min) (ets) (min) (ets) (miD) lets) (miD) (ets) (miD) lets) (min) (efs)
_______aa_________...___aaaaa..______==_=-aa_______..____________D...sa.__..._______..___._...........__
1 0.0001 31 1.2370 61 0.2711 91 121 151
2 0.0020 32 1.1355 62 0.1844 92 122 152
3 0.0129 33 1. 0254 63 0.1103 93 123 153
4 0.0462 34 0.9282 64 0.0628 94 124 154
5 0.1086 35 0.8511 65 0.0354 95 125 155
6 0.1908 36 0.7926 66 0.0186 96 126 156
7 0.2813 37 0.7483 67 0.0084 97 127 157
8 0.3136 38 0.7138 68 0.0021 98 128 158
9 0.4623 39 0.6868 69 99 129 159
10 0.5630 40 0.6680 70 100 130 160
11 0.6946 41 0.6552 71 101 131 161
12 0.8356 42 0.6452 72 102 132 162
13 0.9642 43 o . 6362 13 103 133 163
14 1.0134 44 0.6261 74 104 134 164
15 1.1644 45 0.6159 75 105 135 165
16 1.2557 46 0.6092 76 106 136 166
17 1. 3650 47 0.6075 77 107 137 167
18 1. 4746 48 0.6074 78 108 138 168
19 1. 5504 49 0.5980 79 109 139 169
20 1.5137 50 0.5700 80 110 140 170
21 1.5654 51 0.5340 81 111 141 171
22 1.5436 52 0.5031 82 112 142 172
23 1.5147 53 0.4832 83 113 143 173
24 1. 4861 54 0.4708 84 114 144 174
25 1.4606 55 0.4561 85 115 145 175
26 1.4414 56 0.4321 86 116 146 176
27 1. 4268 57 0.4051 87 117 147 177
28 1.4043 58 0.3844 88 118 148 178
29 1. 3618 59 0.3711 89 119 149 179
30 1. 3079 60 0.3409 90 120 150 180
[J
D
D
o
o
D
u
D
D
u
o
o
D
u
D
D
[J
o
3/26/01 page
DONATOS PIZZA CARMEL, INDIANA
STORMIIATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM STUDY
POST DEVELOPED 100YR/1HR
...------..__..____......_..............._....._.....______a...______
DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY
BASIN ID: POST2100 NAME: POST DEVELOPED 100YRI1HR
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA. ... . . . : 0.13 Acres BASEFLOIIS : 0.00 efs
RAINFALL TyPE....: HUFF1 PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION. . . . : 3.01 inehes AREA..: 0.13 Acres 0.00 Acres
TIME INTERVAL....: 1. 00 min CN....: 98.00 0.00
TC.... : 5.00 min 0.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.11 efs VOL: 0.03 Ac-tt TIME: 20 min
TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN
RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF
lmin) (efs) (min) (ets) (min) (efs) (min) lefs) (min) lefs) (min) lefs)
.______-=_________=a.___==___._____...___...._____________=___=______=__.____________________=_________=
1 31 0.5545 61 0.1215 91 121 151
2 0.0009 32 0.5090 62 0.0821 92 122 152
3 0.0058 33 0.4591 63 0.0494 93 123 153
4 0.0201 34 0.4161 64 0.0281 94 124 154
5 0.0481 35 0.3815 65 0.0159 95 125 155
6 0.0855 36 0.3553 66 0.0083 96 126 156
1 0.1261 31 0.3354 61 0.0038 91 121 151
8 0.1615 38 0.3200 68 0.0009 98 128 158
9 0.2012 39 0.3019 69 99 129 159
10 o . 2 52 4 40 0.2995 10 100 130 160
11 0.3114 41 0.2931 11 101 131 161
12 0.3146 42 0.2892 12 102 132 162
13 0.4322 43 0.2852 13 103 133 163
14 0.4812 44 0.2801 14 104 134 164
15 0.5220 45 0.2161 15 105 135 165
16 0.5629 46 0.2131 16 106 136 166
11 0.6119 41 0.2123 11 101 131 161
18 0.6610 48 0.2123 18 108 138 168
19 0.6950 49 0.2681 19 109 139 169
20 0.1055 50 0.2555 80 110 140 110
21 0.1011 51 0.2394 81 111 141 III
22 0.6919 52 0.2255 82 112 142 112
23 0.6190 53 0.2166 83 113 143 113
24 0.6662 54 0.2110 84 114 144 114
25 0.6548 55 0.2045 85 115 145 115
26 0.6461 56 0.1931 86 116 146 116
21 0.6396 51 0.1816 81 111 141 111
28 0.6295 58 0.1123 88 118 148 118
29 0.6105 59 0.1664 89 119 149 119
30 0.5863 60 0.1528 90 120 150 180
o
D
o
o
o
o
u
o
o
u
o
o
o
u
o
D
u
[J
D
D
3/26/01 page 3
DONATOS PIZZA CARMEL, INDIAIlA
STORHllATER MANAGEIlEIIT SYSTEM STUDY
POST DEVELOPED 100YR/111R
........;a.a__...__..lIl:ID.......ZlIIIlDD_...D...g....allll...__IiI........_....aa__....._...
DETAIL BASIN SllMHARY
BASIN ID: POST3100 NAME: POST DEVELOPED 100YR/II1R
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA.......: 0.22 Acres BASEFLOliS : 0.00 efs
RAINFALL TyPE....: HUFFl PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION....: 3.07 inches AREA..: 0.22 Acres 0.00 Acres
TIME INTERVAL....: 1. 00 min eN....: 98.00 0.00
TC....: 5.00 min 0.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAK RATE: 1.19 efs VOL: 0.05 Ae-ft TINE: 20 min
TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TINE DESIGN TINE DESIGN
RllHOFF RllHOFF RllHOFF RllHOFF RllHOFF RllHOFF
(min) (efs) (min) (ets) (min) (ets) (min) (ets) (min) (efs) (min) lefs)
.......................__.........____......aaa........._____.................____........_____.__.....DD......a.=.................................
1 31 0.9384 61 0.2057 91 121 151
2 0.0015 32 0.8614 62 0.1399 92 122 152
3 0.0098 33 0.7779 63 0.0837 93 123 153
4 0.0350 34 0.7042 64 0.0476 94 124 154
5 0.0824 35 0.6457 65 0.0269 95 125 155
6 0.1448 36 0.6013 66 0.0141 96 126 156
7 0.2134 37 0.5676 67 0.0064 97 127 157
8 0.2834 38 0.5415 68 0.0016 98 128 158
9 0.3507 39 0.5210 69 99 129 159
10 0.4271 40 0.5068 70 100 130 160
11 0.5269 41 0.4970 71 101 131 161
12 0.6339 42 0.4894 72 102 132 162
13 0.7314 43 0.4827 73 103 133 163
14 0.8143 44 0.4750 74 104 134 164
15 0.8834 45 0.4673 75 105 135 165
16 0.9526 46 o . 4 621 76 106 136 166
17 1. 0355 47 0.4608 77 107 137 167
18 1.1187 48 o .4608 78 108 138 168
19 1.1761 49 0.4537 79 109 139 169
20 1.1939 50 0.4324 80 110 140 170
21 1.1875 51 0.4051 81 III 141 171
22 1.1710 52 0.3817 82 112 142 172
23 1.1491 53 0.3666 83 113 143 173
24 1.1274 54 0.3572 84 114 144 174
25 1.1081 . 55 0.3460 85 115 145 175
26 1. 0935 56 0.3278 86 116 146 176
27 1. 0824 57 0.3073 87 117 147 177
28 1.0653 58 0.2916 88 118 148 178
29 1.0331 59 0.2815 89 119 149 179
30 0.9922 60 0.2586 90 120 150 180
D
u
D
u
D
D
u
D
o
D
D
D
D
o
u
o
u
u
D
3/26/01 page
DONATOS PIZZA CA1lMEL, INDIANA
STORMllATER MANAGEIIENT SYSTEM STUDY
POST DEVELOPED 100YR/IRR
aa____a_ma.oo.............___________.___......_.____...-=___..______
DETAIL HYDROGRAPH SUMIlARY
HYDROGRAPH No. 1
Peak runoff: 3.4667 efs Total Vol: 0.15 ae-ft
TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN
RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF
(min) (ets) (min) lefs) (min) lets) (minl lefs) (min) lefs)
----._--~._-----------------..__._.~--_..---_._-----_._.._----------..-.--~-----
1 41 1. 4645 Bl 121 161
2 0.0017 42 1. 4393 92 122 162
3 0.0127 43 1.4171 93 123 163
4 0.0537 44 1. 3964 94 124 164
5 0.1493 45 1.3740 95 125 165
6 0.3021 46 1.3542 96 126 166
7 0.4999 47 1. 3431 97 127 167
9 0.6909 49 1. 3406 99 129 169
9 0.9919 49 1. 3334 99 129 169
10 1.0966 50 1. 2995 90 130 170
11 1. 3423 51 1. 2307 91 131 171
12 1. 6399 52 1.1551 92 132 172
13 1.9416 53 1. 0952 93 133 173
14 2.2107 54 1. 0570 94 134 174
15 2.4379 55 1. 0279 95 135 175
16 2.6390 56 0.9994 96 136 176
17 2.9540 57 0.9331 97 137 177
19 3.0955 59 0.9792 99 139 179
19 3.3119 59 0.9392 99 139 179
20 3.4392 60 0.7961 100 140 190
21 3.4667 61 0.6994 101 141 191
22 3.4391 62 0.5325 102 142 192
23 3.3946 63 0.3509 103 143 193
24 3.3211 64 0.2073 104 144 194
25 3.2603 65 0.1179 105 145 195
26 3.2099 66 0.0654 106 146 196
21 3.1699 67 0.0333 107 147 197
29 3.1317 69 0.0139 109 149 198
29 3.0669 69 0.0031 109 149 189
30 2.9644 70 110 150 190
31 2.9326 71 111 151 191
32 2.6529 72 112 152 192
33 2.4224 73 113 153 193
34 2.1892 74 114 154 194
35 1. 9900 75 115 155 195
36 1. 9340 76 116 156 196
31 1. 7156 77 117 151 197
38 1. 6252 18 118 159 198
39 1. 5549 19 119 159 199
40 1. 5015 80 120 160 200
D
u
D
u
u
D
u
D
u
D
u
D
u
o
D
D
u
u
3/26/01
DONATOS PIZZA CARMEL, INDIANA
STORMIIATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM STUDY
POST DEVELOPED 100YR/1HR
u
REACH SllIlIlARY
PIPE REACH ID No. IlI2
From: Il To: 12
Pipe Diameter: 1. 00 ft n: 0.0130
Pipe Len;th 173.31 ft s: 0.0050
Up invert 822.62 ft down invert: 821. 76 ft
Collection Area: 0.29 Ac.
Design Flow 1. 57 cfs Ds;n Depth: 0.57 ft
Pipe Capacity 2.71 cfs
Design Vel 3.38 fps Travel Time: 0.85 min
Pipe Full Vel 3.54 fps
PIPE REACH ID No. 1214
From: 12 To: 14
Pipe Diameter: 1. 00 ft n: 0.0130
Pipe Len;th 53.78 ft s: 0.0048
Up invert 821. 76 ft down invert: 821. 50 ft
Collection Area: 0.42 Ac.
Design Flow 2.28 cfs Dsgn Depth: 0.75 ft
Pipe Capacity 2.67 cfs
Desi;n Vel 3.59 fps Travel Time: 0.25 min
Pipe Full Vel 3.49 fps
PIPE REACH ID No. 1314
From: 13 To: 14
Pipe Diameter: 1. 00 ft n: 0.0130
Pipe Length 38.08 ft s: 0.0047
Up invert 821. 68 ft down invert: 821.50 ft
Collection Area: 0.22 Ac.
Design Flow 1.19 cfs Dsgn Depth: 0.51 ft
Pipe Capacity 2.64 cfs
Design Vel 3.11 fps Travel Time: 0.20 min
Pipe Full Vel 3.45 fps
PIPE REACH ID No. HIS
From: 14 To: IS
Pipe Diameter: 1. 00 ft n: 0.0130
Pipe Length 20.56 ft s: 0.0866
Up invert 821. 50 ft down invert: 819.72 ft
Collection Area 0.64 Ac.
Desi;n Flow 3.47 cfs Dsgn Depth: 0.40 ft
Pipe Capacity 11.31 cfs
Design Vel 12.00 fps Travel Time: 0.03 min
Pipe Full Vel 14.77 fps
u
D
o
o
u
u
u
D
u
u
o
o
D
D
u
u
page 5
D
o
3/26/01
page 6
DONATOS PIZZA Cl\l\HEL, INDIANA
STORMIiATER KAIlAGEKENT SYSTEM STUDY
POST DEVELOPED 100n/lHR
D
REACH SUIlMARY
D
Network Reach NORTH
REACH <-AREA> <-DIA> LENGTH SLOPE < n > DSGN Q' PIPE Ndepth 'Depth Vact Vfull C Area
ID (Ac) (ft) (ft) ft/ft ------ (cfs) ------ (ft) ------ (fps) (fps)-
I3I4
0.22 1.00
38.08 0.0047 0.0130
1.19 45.18 0.51 50.82 3.11
3.45 POST3100
D
Network Reach SOUTH
REACH <-AREA> <-DIA> LENGTH SLOPE < n > DSGN Q' PIPE Ndepth 'Depth Vact Vful1 C Area
ID (Ac) (ft) (ft) ft/ft ------ (cts) ------ (tt) ------ (tps) (tps)-
D
1112 0.29 1.00 173.31 0.0050 0.0130
I2I4 0.42 1.00 53.780.00480.0130
Confluence with Network NORTH
1415 0.64 1.00 20.56 0.0866 0.0130
1.57 58.14 0.57 57.30 3.38 3.54 POSTllOO
2.28 85.30 0.75 75.41 3.59 3.49 POST2l00
3.47 30.66 0.40 39.53 12.00 14.77
o
D
o
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
o
D
D
o
3/26/01
DONATOS PIZZA CAllMEL, INDIANA
STOIOOlATER MAHAGEIlENT SYSTEM STUDY
POST DEVELOPED 100n/1HR
o
STRUCTURE REPORT
EXISTING STRUCTURE REACH
o
ID No. 11
page
Location : IiEST AREA INLET North 5544 .1300
Str Type : A-MOD East 8260.6700
Str Cat Catch Basin Rim !lev 824.8100
Area/sump: 4.00 sf/O.OO ft Bottom E1: 822.6200
Cont Area: POSTllOO Hgrade Bl: 0.0000 ft
Bend..... : No special shape
Ent type.: Area/sump:
Ent Loss: 0.000 Exit: 0.000 App Vel: 0.000 Junct: 0.000 Bend: 0.000
o
Reach <Invert> <Diam> < n > <End>
1112 822.620 12.00 0.013 Upper
o
PROPOSED STRUCTURE REACH
ID No. 12
o
Loca tion :
Str Type :
Str Cat
Area/sump:
Cont Area:
Bend... . . :
Ent type.:
Ent Loss:
D
Reach
1112
1214
o
SOUTH CURB INLET
J-BOX CURB INLET
Catch Basin
6.00 sf/O.OO ft
POST2100
No special shape
Area/sump:
0.000 Exit: 0.000 App Vel:
<Invert>
821. 760
821. 760
<Diam>
12.00
12.00
< n >
0.013
0.013
PROPOSED STRUCTURE REACH
Location :
Str Type :
Str Cat
Area/sump:
Cont Area:
Bend.. ... :
Ent type.:
Ent Loss:
D
10 No. 13
NORTHEAST CURB INLET
J-BOX CURB INLET
Catch Basin
6.00 sf/O.OO ft
POST3100
No special shape
Area/sump:
0.000 Exit: 0.000 App Vel:
D
Reach <Invert> <Oiam> < n > <End>
1314 821.680 12.00 0.013 upper
D
D
D
D
D
o
o
D
North
East
Rim !lev
Bottom E1:
Hgrade El:
0.000 Junct:
<End>
Lower
Upper
North
East
Rim Elev
Bottom El:
Hgrade El:
0.000 Junct:
5492.8900
8426.2300
824.2200
821. 7600
0.0000 ft
0.000 Bend: 0.000
5579.1400
8453.8900
824.6900
821. 6800
0.0000 ft
0.000 Bend: 0.000
D
D
3/26/01
DONATOS PIZZA CARMEL, INDIANA
STORMIIATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM STUDY
POST DEVELOPED 100YR/IHR
o
STRUCTURE REPORT
PROPOSED STRUCTURE REACH
D
Location :
Str Type :
Str Cat
Area/sump:
Cont Area:
Bend.. ...:
Ent type.:
Ent Loss:
D
D
Reach
1214
IJH
1415
10 110. 14
JUNCTION STRUCTURE
A-MOD BOX
Catch Basin
4.00 sf/O.OO ft
No special shape
Area/sump:
0.000 Exit: 0.000 App Vel:
<Invert>
821.500
821. 500
821. 500
<Diam>
12.00
12.00
12.00
< n >
0.013
0.013
0.013
PROPOSED STRUCTURE REACH
D
Location :
Str Type :
Str Cat
Area/sump:
Cont Area:
Bend..... :
Ent type.:
Ent Loss:
D
10 No. 15
REPLACEMENT FOR EX. INLET
A-MOD
Catch Basin
4.00 sf/O.OO ft
No special shape
Area/sump:
0.000 Exit: 0.000 App Vel:
Reach <Invert> <Diam> < n > <End>
1415 819.720 12.00 0.013 Lower
D
D
D
D
o
D
D
D
o
D
o
North
East
Rim El ev
Bottom El:
Hqrade El:
0.000 Janet:
<End>
Lower
Lower
Upper
North
East
Rim Elev
Bottom El:
Hqrade El:
o . 000 Junct:
paqe
5541.3000
8449.6600
825.0000
821. 5000
0.0000 ft
0.000 Bend: 0.000
5535.2100
8469.3000
825.0000
819.7200
0.0000 ft
0.000 Bend: 0.000
o
o
D
D
D
D
D
o
D
D
o
D
D
D
o
D
o
D
o
Cannel. Indiana - 1422 Keystone Way
Existinq Condition Drainaae Area MaQ
".
."p-'"
"p-~
.
~.
;t'!'
ONE STORY BlOCK
BUIlD1NG
BEN MAR, liC
INSTRUMENT 19749659
TAX PARCU NO.
16-IO-3HJO-OO-OIJOOO
ZONEO B8
15' lliCllIC waDr PER
DfID 8lJ(Jl; 269, PAOC 1J1'
AOW"Y PER
,PAa49J ~~
<J."
#
5/8" RlIlAR w/'IIllOW
29 eN' fOl.N) 0.1'" 0.1'N
"lo 5je- REBAR FCUCD
() :V~ o.rw. 0.9'N
;p- <t,-Oi FEHCE O.2'W
#
~9'.s..}
<J.~>-
./
.. ~IJN[ , _----+
~ ;> ~
r l""""'FEItC( 0# q
~-to'" il>
~
+ -$'-
'b<Q.~
<llASS
,">
0#
-'
4'
ONE STORY BlOCK BUIlD1NG
ASPHAlT
~
"l-
Q;;
Cr.:i
--....:.
~
~
~
~
~
EQ
~
. 'lOUT"""
~
1-8OCHJ82-5544
au ill Ill[
~5200
,. aus GJ1D CF MIMIA
GRAPHIC SCALE
'h.~~ i
( III FIIrr )
llDch-20 It.
~'I,~S.4o''''
,,'oJ +-s;
~~
~ A
~ !
!
~
~ ~
I
iii -
-...
,.,
FIIloIl:f_
DONATOS
PIZZA
FIIloIl:f LCX:A1DI
1422 KE:YSTONE WA
a INDIANA
FIIloIl:f....
0120
_BY
B.KUHN
omm
G. LUKAS
~
i
~
~
~
~
I
I
~
~
~
~
l
~
~
!;;~
~-
....
,
~~
,.,rfJli....
r:~I~
i"ull
I'l.o.:'&-=:
~~
~I
~Uj~
Q) ~ ~U
~
SI&T ..
EXISTING
CONDITION
DRAINAGE
AREA
MAP
SI&T
i
EX2
..... llA"
MARCH 27, 2001
o
D
U
o
o
o
o
D
o
D
o
o
o
o
D
o
D
D
o
Carmel. Indiana -1422 Keystone Way
fr2posed Condition Drainaqe Area MaR
1ll'E QJR8 IIUf /
~~_I<GRA1E
UII
.., OUT (In . lI2Q.84
~ (ClIl ~ SIR . 1lOC)
Eaw:
'.
4'''
#~ +~
I5'CASlJI(~TPEJI~
eJD.,.. PACE 60 .....
--..III':omDr ~
____...4'
,4'. , 4'~
4'41 4''1>
I
I
I 'tr '""'" RlUID
_ o..tw, Q.4't11
/
/
"-
-
/
I
~---
, 'lD
...
a
~
~~ :"~I
s",," III
~~~ \1 'tc
.."'." \, I I
4> \
10' DL~~f \
OEEDBOCIl:255,PA<J:JIJ
to' GAS UNE EASODT PER
DEED OOJ( JOt. PACE 60
+4'~.~g...-
5% REBAR w/'ftll(JII
CAP FOOHD 0.1". o.7'N
/ 5/ff RfBM F(UI)
/ o.s..o.g'M
- I
I
I
, 5/r REBAR FlUIl
~ o.A,1J.4-S
:- I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
1
....... /<~tl ~~-
.~~ 4' I: rr-
d~.;;; J~,I
~ih : :
H~:3~: :
I I
I I
I I
I I
1 I
I I
I I
-
~o/
4":/
~
,4'
"
,4"
I
I
I
I #,-f>
I'
I
,
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
,4'41
,,,,",,,r
~ RQJR8 INUJ ./ ::
TOP C1f ~~ I< GRATE:!
IIIV IN (12") a 820.92 .,
IIIV OUT (12") . 820 92
~~.89(CTR C1f sril . 1lOC)
E 8428.23
1ll'E "-IlOO AREA NET ./
NEEIWI R-.I405 _ I< GRA
TOP C1f CAS11NC=824.81 n:
IIIV OUT (I~ a 822.62
~~l ~ STR)
E 8260.67
1ll'E "-IlOO AREA INIEl' /
::; R-.I405 _ I< ~
!IN IN (~~'
IIN OUT (12j . aZo.66
~nr~CTR C1f STR)
E 8449.66
BENCHrK DATA
IlIl - (HI!l 28) COPPERWEUl
C1f 11611> ISIlltET AND ~ STm CASING AT !HE IN1tRS[CllOIl
EWI. a ~'9.78 (1lGW 29) RlINl
~~fri> - ~ ~ SIJ[ C1f CONCRETE AREA lJQlT ~
C1f "Y C1f SUBJECT 1IOCT. llEST C1f
EWI.. 3.68 ' FIWEIlENT
TIlIl'2 aJTYIN_
~fm C1f IIl1RIlIEJ6f SIJ[ ~ CONCRETE AREA lJQlT ~
n ~ C1f ICFtSlllNE WAY CORIER C1f Sl8JECT 1IOCT llEST ~
~... 4.J8
J
I
\
~ NOlES
I. lItE ',lIPS ~ QJR8S
2. ~:SlllPES~IIE~r_fN!HIl~
:T - BLVArr:: s:: OOIlSISfANTlY UNWtlRII IIE11IEEIt IH[
3. lItE iSUIMY UI'OII WIICIl
AND lIJIlAS I< _ nas - IS 8ASO) IS
1IIE1.liCClIIIC:Y C1f lItE~ IIlC lIMES III ~ IIlHIRS
1lIAf,lltE M:lII!I. IWiEUlE . 1HEREJ1lIE !HE CllIIl1IN:IllR AS 10
~1IIST1IE~~1lW'-~-
, IH[ ATlDlIION C1f lItE
~"'~s . ..~
~~
~
~
I
.1
NOTICES AND PERMITS
I.' -
~T ML~ ~ Ff1R:#_ OR
_~ OR srATE~~FRlIII
2. ~ lIE lItE CllIlIIW:TOR'
EXACT UlCAllON C1f t. RESPOIlSIIIIUlY 10 IlElIRIINE
~ AREA PRIOR 10 sr~ IN !HE w:lNIlY ~ IH[
3. IT 9Wl lIE lItE CllIlIIW:TOR' 00IISlRUCl1llN.
Lcogrr~~1O~~
STORM SEWER INLET STRUCTURES
SI1l\JCI\JII[ NO Bn.DEE
SIR '1 INIEl' 1ll'E " ~
STR '2 INIEI .'A-V.D" R-.I405
SIR 13 1ll'E :r R-3287-11V
STR '4 ~ 1'll'E :1' R-3287-11V
SIR "" 1'll'E 'A-V.D" R-.I405
.. INIEl' 1ll'E "A-IIllO" R-.I405
N01E:
~~ oom IN PAVED AREAS ARE 10
CONCRETE APRlINS.
2. CAS11NC 1'll'E
COIIPI\NI' CATR.OC ~ NEEIWl AlUNII!R'I
3. EllUVAIDII CASI1NGS
IolAY lIE SUIIS1111JItD BY 01IIER 1WIUf'AC1URES
IIIIH OINER'S __
.I..ElZWD
FP . F1II5HED PA\'EIIENT
TC . TOP ~ CURB
1W a TOP or SIIlEWAIJ(
1lE. a IIATOI EllIS11NG
IlOC IloICK C1f CURB
\ a _ now llIREC110N
I IFP=loo.oo1 = F1II5HED GR.\llE ~
I
DONT 'laP.._
~
~
~
~_.J
--
GRAPHIC SCALE
':' i 'I'
( III ran)
I IrJcb _ 20 It.
i
I
;~
~
I
iii -
-...
~.
...... -
OONATOS
PIZZA
...... .....
1422 KEYSTONE WA
INDIANA
--
0120
.... BY
B.KUHN
amID
G. LUKAS
i I I
~ I ~
~ .
!
~
.~;
"'I'
JlSi~
~~~
,,~.!
~i
til
CI) ~ iU
~
lIIET
POST
DEVELOPED
DRAINAGE
AREA
MAP
HET_
i
EX1
.........
MARCH 9. 2001