Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTraffic Report July 1994 12 V R see 1;0 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS FOR C. P. MORGAN CO., INC. July 1994 Prepared For: C.P. Morgan Company, Inc. 301 East Carmel Drive, Suite E-300 Carmel, Indiana 46032 Prepared By: Pflum, Klausmcier & Gehrum Consultants 47 South Pennsylvania Street, 9th Floor Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-3622 317/636-1552 Cincinnati, Ohio • Hudson, Ohio • Glasgow, Scotland 'Traffic Operations Analysis C.P. Morgan Company, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Pale PREPARER'S QUALIFICATIONS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE 2 EXISTING ROADWAYS 2 Gray Road 2 116th Street 3 Gray Road at 116th Street 3 BACKGROUND GROWTH OF EXISTING TRAFFIC 4 SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC AND DISTRIBUTION 4 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) RATINGS 5 CONCLUSION 6 RECOMMENDATIONS 8 #2117 Traffic Operations analysis C.P. Morgan Company, Inc. PREPARER'S QUALIFICATIONS I certify that this Traffic Operations Analysis has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of traffic and transportathwt engineering. ♦`ISASEF��r ,.: No. t \ * :.. Thomas E. Ford, P.E. • TAT O Indiana Registration 20835 ��F�;�.%o�ANP�. `SR �4`'�� Pflum, Klausmeier & Gehrum Consultants O........... ♦♦ INTRODUCTION This Traffic Operations Analysis has been prepared for C. P. Morgan which proposes to develop a residential community in Hamilton County near the southeast quadrant of the intersection of 116th Street and Gray Road as shown in Figure 1. It is believed that this development does not meet the minimum criteria set forth in Section II A, B, or C in the Applicants' Guide for Transportation Impact Studies For Proposed Development, adopted by the Carmel Plan Commission by Resolution 021892 on 18 February 1992 which requires a full Transportation Impact Study Therefore this Traffic Operations Analysis (TOA) has been prepared for the development. 1 Traffic Operations Analysis C.P. Morgan Company, Inc. DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE The conceptual site plan for this development was prepared by Schneider Engineering Corporation and is shown in Figure 2. The site includes nearly 47 acres and provides for approximately 84 lots and is generally located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of 116th Street and Gray Road. An internal roadway system provides access to all of the home sites and provides for one ingress/egress point on Gray Road as well as a connection to the Kingswood Subdivision at the existing Regency Lane alignment. EXISTING ROADWAYS Gray Road Gray Road is a two lane, north-south roadway which is continuous from 96th Street past 146th Street. Gray Road currently provides an alternate route to Keystone Avenue for those commuters destined for or leaving from the business area on 96th Street east of Keystone Avenue and south of I-465 via River Road. Gray Road is currently classified as a Secondary Parkway in the 1991 Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Update for the City of Carmel and Clay Township. As such, the recommended total right-of-way width is 120 feet in this area. 2 Traffic Operations Analysis C.P. Morgan Company, Inc. 116th Street One of the major east-west roadways in Hamilton County is 116th Street. This is true because of the fact that it is one of a few roads that cross the White River and it is continuous across the County. It has been the subject of much debate and many studies. It is currently classified as a Primary Parkway. Most Primary Parkways carry a recommended total right-of-way of 150 feet, however 116th Street is to match the predominant width of existing right-of-way. Gray Road at 116th Street This intersection was recently improved by the City of Carmel to provide one left turn lane, one thru lane, one right turn lane, and one receiving lane in each direction. In addition, a fully-actuated traffic signal was installed to control vehicles entering the intersection. The fully-actuated controller allows the traffic signals to respond to traffic demands in a very efficient manner. This feature automatically adjusts the amount of green time allocated for each movement depending on the demand. As a result, the signal responds to the variable peak demands and manages the traffic efficiently. Another benefit of the intersection improvement project is the construction of the formal right turn lane in all directions. During the peak hours, a high percentage of right turning vehicles in all directions completed the movement while facing a red indication. This increases the intersection efficiency. 3 • Traffic Operations Analysis C.P. Morgan Company, Inc. BACKGROUND GROWTH OF EXISTING TRAFFIC This general area in Hamilton County is experiencing a good deal of growth in development and therefore a 5% per year growth in existing traffic volumes was used for this study. In addition, the anticipated traffic volumes associated with Waterstone Development was also added directly to the traffic volumes for future year analyses. SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC AND DISTRIBUTION The estimated site generated traffic was determined using the methods as set forth in the 5th Edition of Trip Generation as published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Although a connection is provided to the neighboring subdivision to the south (Kingswood), all site generated traffic has been assumed to enter and exit the new development directly from Gray Road at the primary access point. The distribution pattern of the site generated traffic has been determined from a review of the existing traffic patterns, a review of potential origins and destinations of the trips, and a general knowledge of the area. Figure 3 provides the anticipated AM and PM peak hour site generated volumes and the distribution pattern of those trips. 4 Traffic Operations Analysis C. P. Morgan Company, Inc. LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) RATINGS Existing traffic volumes were recorded at the intersection of Gray Road and 116th Street by physical observations between 7:15 and 8:15 AM and then between 5:15 and 6:15 PM on Tuesday, 28 June 1994. In addition, a sample of the individual timings of each traffic signal phase was recorded for use in the capacity analyses. The computer software program entitled Highway Capacity Software (HCS) which is associated with the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), Special Report 209 as published by the Transportation Research Board, was used to analyze the operating characteristics of the intersection of Gray Road and 116th Street. While the HCS is a good tool and is a standard method of determining the operating characteristics of an intersection, it can not completely simulate the working operation of a fully-actuated traffic signal. For example, it does not allow for the "skipping" of a phase if no vehicles are waiting to be served, as the actual traffic signal controller will do at the intersection. Therefore, the resulting Level-of- Service (LOS) ratings should be viewed as average LOS ratings for the hour. As stated earlier, sample timings for each phase in the traffic signal cycle were recorded and are reflected in the existing condition analyses. Future condition analyses utilize different timings for the individual traffic phases, however the overall cycle lengths remain between 95 seconds and 120 seconds which is in the normal range for this area. 5 'Traffic Operations Analysis C.P. Morgan Company, Inc. Figures 4, 5, 6, and 7 provide the resulting LOS ratings for the intersection of Gray Road at 116th Street and the new intersection on Gray Road at the new development access point for the following conditions: Figure 4 Existing conditions Figure 5 Existing traffic plus site generated traffic Figure 6 Existing traffic plus 3 years growth of 5% per year plus site generated traffic Figure 7 Existing traffic plus 10 years growth at 5% per year plus Waterstone traffic plus site generated traffic. Figures 8, 9, 10, and 11 provide the traffic volumes that were used in these analyses. The LOS ratings as shown in Figures 6 and 7 are the result of changes in peak hour factors and signal phasing. Summary sheets of these analyses can be found in the Technical Appendix. CONCLUSION The proposed development is estimated to add nearly 880 vehicle trips to the roadway network on a daily basis. This would be 440 vehicles in and 440 out of the site. The number of additional vehicle trips during the AM and PM peak hours are relatively low. Approximately 18 vehicles are expected to enter while 51 vehicles exit the site during the AM peak hour and 59 vehicles are anticipated to enter and 33 vehicles are expected to leave the site during the PM peak hour. 6 Traffic Operations Analysis C.P. Morgan Company, Inc. These additional vehicles are not sufficient enough to alter the intersection LOS ratings during the AM and PM peak hour at the signalized intersection of Gray Road and 116th Street. The northbound to eastbound right turn movement does, however, change from LOS C to LOS D during the PM peak hour if no additional right-turn-on-red vehicles are assumed. Some intersection LOS degradation is found when 3 years of background growth is introduced and the intersection becomes over saturated and fails during the AM and PM peak hours for the 10 year study horizon. Generally good LOS ratings are expected for the access drive on Gray Road to the development. The exceptions to this are 3 years hence during the PM peak when the left turning vehicles leaving the site are expected to experience a LOS D and 10 years hence when those left turning vehicles experience a LOS D and LOS E for the AM and PM peak hours respectively. The recent improvements completed on the intersection of Gray Road and 116th Street are compatible with the future configuration of 116th Street at this time. In addition, the expected LOS ratings for this intersection are considered acceptable in an urbanized setting for the AM and PM peak hours up through 3 years of growth which is when this development is expected to be fully occupied. The 10 year horizon scenario however reflects LOS ratings that are not acceptable. However, it is possible that before these 10 years pass, the extension of Hazel Dell Road to 96th Street and the extension of 96th Street across the White River will be reality. If these things happen, Hazel Dell Road will provide relief to Gray Road and 96th Street will provide relief to 116th Street. The end result of these alternative routes should lessen the impact of all area development on the intersection of Gray Road at 116th Street. 7 Traffic Operations Analysis C.P. Morgan Company, Inc. RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations are made for the proposed development. 1. The entrance to the proposed development should be constructed with one right turn and one left turn lane and one receiving lane. 2. Appropriate acceleration and deceleration lanes should be constructed on the east side of Gray Road at the access drive. 3. A passing blister should be constructed for southbound through vehicles. 4. The timing and phasing of the traffic signal at Gray Road and 116th Street should be closely monitored and adjusted as necessary to respond to changes in driving patterns. 5. An appropriate amount of right-of-way should be dedicated to allow for a 60 feet, half right-of-way to be maintained on the east side of Gray Road adjacent to this property. #2117 8 I16th Street _<e::---- - -0 o 0 cc 0 Cr Q 00 w Cr Z FE O Q H cn cc co w w Y 106th Street ��� G1 / 3r Aelipk ,,,,,,, FIGURE VICINITY MAP __ A rT t t oTf1 'C7'77-FT_ -- 1 . . .\ 1 - vuE \p 1 / c(r- . 70 -4 i war,ri IwMr Ir/D 2/) \\ 7-- 71 ; I� ab _ /I 74 .,/,N\/ \�-� .,T IC \ 77 � 72 �. / . 65 / • N N //V- ; ,48. / N:57 / <61- ...9 • N 44* CL / -71 /c0.7-M .1 . _ IN/ 5 ./N " • > ' . A / cif ii----,-4 N/ 15/ ./\ - ,,,_ •,\ _ \ A 1 5,, , , ,.. 2. 40 > \j* r C7.N -y> • I**‘61 ,.2a )�. ) o 42 •i 2‘,,A I'' l� i �• 5R l I \\ �2 . 3 • .I 4 \ C 25 ` 43 1�. . �; I5a \ 6 I7 I . 5 .. \. 44 . 1---- z3 �-•l > `� ,.. 7.> •i 4-51 ez \ ci_____i 56. 1 -7—77-1'\ 0 \ .--) 11 11'±i i . io I IizI 13 rci 4:r L. H. r -�-- 154 17� `\� aq • �i I � / .'-----; --� 52 `I I I 5D 51 N 1 1 I I \ Ica FIGURE 2 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN 3 / (9) II6th Street 2 cep 6 (IB) -4 18 8 5 / (12) (5) (3) //777 V SITE IN OUT AM 18 51 PM 59 33 v / o / 0 � II (35) 0 r� 31 (20) 20 (13) (-7 / 00 . AM (24) (00) = PM / 1// FIGURE 3 SITE GENERATED TRIPS and DISTRIBUTION c D D 116th Street (a ( ) ( 1 8 (81 o (e) C (C) 8 (D) C (e) 8 (D) �- 8 (e) t r._>_ C c C (C) (D) (C) / //6777 / SITE .r, -o v i 0 cc N/A >, (N/A)0 9 • N/A (N/A) N/A (N/A) 00 - AM (7- (00) • PM FIGURE 4 EXISTING LOS RATINGS / C D — - ccl (c) (DEIl) 116th Street B (B) D (B) B (D) C (C) / C (B) B (D) Dr- B (B) C C C / 77 / (C) (D) (D) SITE r./ O / 0 A (A) 6- A (A) B (C) = Y 00 - AM (0O) - PM FIGURE 5 LOS RATINGS for EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC / D E F - /// (C) (C) (F) II6th Street B (8) 4 D (C) B (F) D (E) 7 D (B) B (E) C D D .7.77 /77 (C) (D) (D) / SITE r// 00 / CC A (A) C� A (A) C (D) - Y 00 a AM (00)a PM 2' r/ FIGURE 6 LOS RATINGS for EXISTING TRAFFIC plus 10 YEARS GROWTH (at 5% per year) PLUS SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC / D F ID) (D) (*) 116th Street . ) iL B (c) • --- * (C) )‘ B (*) * (* ) * (C) C (*) B (B) (...___>_ )if C D D � D 7 7/ //77 // (C) (*) (F) / / SITE r, r/ y _0 fr 0 (B) > 0 A (C) il:i r 0 (E) 00 = AM / COO). PM / 2 r/ FIGURE 7 LOS RATINGS for EXISTING TRAFFIC plus 10 YEARS GROWTH (at 5% per year) PLUS WATERSTONE PLUS SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC 112 201 235 (158) ( 76) (178) 116th Street ___.,2 _.e...) 1. _.,.. A --,-_.160 (320) '<--- 623 (383) 95 (221) - 358 ( 84) 265 (666) Y 8 ( 19) -< >- -"--- .---)f I 1' 22 55 58 7 /J/ !/ / 7 / (39) (274) (301) / / SITE r/ ,/ / / -o / CC 567 N/A (179) (N/A) / o � ` CO ,ii N/A (N/A) ti r— N/A (N/A) 00 = AM 135 N/A (:, (00) ■ PM (614)(N/A) ' r/ FIGURE 8 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES 112 204 235 116th Street (158) (85) (178) _____; ilk . ...-) ?' 160 (320) /� 4 623 (383) 95 (221) i 360 (92) 265 (666) .N.- 14 (37) -4 �-7 � /j/ 40 63 63 / (5(1 (279) (304) / / SITE r, / -D / 0 / 0 CC567 11 a (179) (35) // to 0 A "if ----->- ----- 31 (20) 20 (13) ,I t i 00AM 135 7 (00)- PM (614) (24) ✓/ ✓ r/ FIGURE 9 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES PLUS SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC / 130 236 272 (1e3) (97) (206) / I I6th Street !� `(4 tea. 185 (370) A 721 (443) 110 (226) 416 (105) 307 (771) >- 15 (40) M �� 43 72 72 /(<-/ J / // '/ /T/ (57) (322)(351) / / / SITE r, 1/ y / -o O , 0 / cc 656 11 >, (207) (35) // o 6 if \ `>►- 31 (20) _ I 20 (13) •, . t tf, 00 ■ AM 156 7 (7:, (00)= PM (710) (24) // r/ FIGURE 10 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES PLUS 3 YEARS GROWTH (at 5% per year) PLUS SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC 226 336 398 (286) (137) (3)7) I16th Street _.j ._?__ A 282 (542) j 1085 (67)) 171 (412) 428 (149) 458 (1168) 19 (49) ��- 54 101 101 <7 / // //77/ /7 V (76) (458) (500 / / SITE r, _/ / -p / 0 / 0 CIL 772 11 a (300) (35} o 6 31 (20) r20 03) y t r).-77 00 - AM 225 7 i / (00)- PM (1014) (24) 2 r/ FIGURE II EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES PLUS 10 YEARS GROWTH (at 5% per year) PLUS WATERSTONE PLUS SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC Traffic Operations Analysis C.P. Morgan Company, Inc. APPENDIX Trip Generation Estimates Site Generated Traffic Volumes Weekday <300 Units Page 258 Ln(T) = 0.921 Ln(84) + 2.698 Ln(T) = 6.778 T 880 440 in 440 out AM Peak <300 Units Page 260 Ln(T) = 0.867 Ln(X) + 0.398 Ln(T) = 0.867 Ln(84) + 0.398 Ln(T) = 4.239 T = 69 18 in 51 out PM Peak <300 Units Page 262 Ln(T) = .902 Ln(X) + 0.528 Ln(T) = .902 Ln(84) + 0.528 Ln(T) = 4.525 T = 92 Trips 59 in 33 out #2117 fl HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 06-29-1994 PFLUM. KLAUSMEIER & GEHRUM CONSULTANTS Streets: (E-W) 116th STREET (N-S) GRAY ROAD Analyst: T. FORD File Name: CPIAM.I1C9 Area 'Ivue: Other 6-29-94 AM PEAK Comment: EXISTING TRAFFIC AND GEOMETRICS Eastbound Westbound ; Northbound Southbound L T R ' L T R I L T R L T R No. Lanes ; 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ; 1 1 1 Volumes ' 95 265 3 353 623 160 22 55 58; 235 201 112 PHF or PK15 0.74 0.81 0.90 0.75 0.87 0.89 0.79 0.92 0.7010.90 0.85 0.70 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0112.0 12.0 12.0 Grade 0 0 0 0 ': Heavy Veh; 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1; 1 1 1 Parking ; (Y/N) N ; (Y/N) N (Y/N) N I (Y/N) N Bus Stops 0; 0 0 0 Con. Peds 0; 0 0 Ci Pod Button (Y/N) N ; (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N Arr Type 3 3 3; 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 RTOR Vols 4; 80 29 50 Prop. Share 0 0; 0 0 0 0 0 0 Prop. Prot. . Assign Perm 23 ; 210 I 8 128 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 ; 5 6 7 8 EB Left * * : NB Left * * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Pods Pods WB Left * * SB Left * * Thru * Thru * Right * ' Right Pods Peds NB Right : EB Right SB Right : WB Right Green 17.OA 36.0A Green 9.0A 17.OA Yellow/A-R 4.0 4.0 ; Yellow/A- 4.0 4.0 Lost Time 3.0 3.0 ; Lost Time 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 95.0 secsPhase combination order: t1:1 tt2 05 06 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS I;:r$ L 342 1805 0.31 0.61 6.9 B 12.1 B T 736 1890 0.44 0.39 14.1 B R 626 1607 0.01 0.39 11.5 (3 WLt L 340 1796 0.78 0.61 18.3 C 27.3 D f 736 1890 0.97 0.39 35.2 D F': 626 1.607 0.14 0.39 12.1 B NE L 189 1796 0.11 0.33 17.0 C 20.0 C T 358 1890 0.17 0.19 20.8 C R 304 1607 - 0.14 0.19 20.7 C 3E, L 189 1796 0.70 0.33 28.8 D 26.4 D T 358 1890 0.66 0.19 25.6 0 R 304 1607 0.29 0.19 21.5 C Intersection Delay = 23.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical. v/c(x) = 0.775 a-Z • HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 06-29-1994 PFLUM. KLAUSMEIER & GEHRUM CONSULTANTS • Streets: (E-W) 116th STREET (N-3) GRAY ROAD Analyst: T. FORD File Name: CP1PM.HC9 Area Type: Other 6-29-94 PM PEAK Comment: EXISTING TRAFFIC AND GEOMETRICS Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R ; L T R No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ; 1 1 1 Volumes 221 666 19 84 383 320 39 274 301: 178 76 158 PHF or PK15 0.35 0.37 0.50 0.81 0.33 0.87: 0.81 0.80 0.89: 0.87 0.56 0.65 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0: 12.0 12.0 12.0: 12.0 12.0 12.() Grade ; 0 0 0 0 % Heavy Veh 1 1 1 1 1 1; 1 1 1' 1 1 1 Parking (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N Bus Stops 0 0 O 0 Con. Peds 0, 0 0, 0 Ped Button (Y/N) N ; (Y/N) N (Y/N) N ; (Y/N) N Arr Type 3 3 3 3 3 3; 3 3 3i 3 3 3 RTOR Vols 9 110; 125: 70 Prop. Share 0 0 O 0: 0 0; 0 0 Prop. Prot. Assign Perm 70 25 17 ; 59 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 ; 5 6 7 8 EB Left * * : NB Left * * Thru * Thru .r� Right * Right 3: Pods Peds WE3 Left * * ' 23 Left * * Thru * Thru :r� Right * Right * Pods Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right ; WB Right Green 12.OA 46.0A : Green 9.OA 22.OA Yellow/A-R 4.0 4.0 ; Yellow/A- 4.0 4.0 Lost Time 3.0 3.0 ; Lost Time 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 105.0 secsPhase combination order: ttl (t2 *5 (t6 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EB L 223 1805 0.85 0.60 30.4 D 26.4 D T 346 1390 0.91 0.4.5 25.5 D R 719 1607 0.03 0.45 10.5 I:, WB L 222 1796 0.36 0.60 3.5 U 12.6 B T 846 1890 0.51 0.45 13.8 U R 719 1607 0.34 0.45 12.3 3 NB L 171 1796 0.18 0.34 18.4 C 29.0 D T 414 1890 0.33 0.22 32.3 D R 352 1607 0.56 0.22 24.9 C SB L 171 1796 0.35 0.34 46.0 E 32.7 D T 414 1890 0.33 0.22 22.4 C R 352 1607 0.38 0.22 22.9 C Intersection Delay = 24.3 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.320 A-3 . 1-ICM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 06-30-1994 PFLUM. KLAUSMEIER & GEHRUM CONSULTANTS Streets: (E-W) 116th STREET (N-S) GRAY ROAD Analyst: T. FORD File Name: CP2AM.HC9 Area Type: Other 6-29-94 AM PEAK Comment: EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R ; L T R No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ; 1 1 1 Volumes 95 265 14 360 623 160 40 63 63: 235 204 112 p1-11= or PK15 0.74 0.31 0.90 0.75 0.37 0.89 0.79 0.92 0.70: 0.90 0.85 0.70 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0: 12.0 12.0 12.0 Grade 0 0 0 0 Heavy Veh 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Parking (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N Bus Stops 0 0 0 0 Con. Peds 0 0 0 0 Ped Button (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N Arr Type 3 3 3 3 3 3; 3 3 3 3 3 3 RTOR Vols 4 80: 29 50 Prop. Share 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0 Prop. Prot. Assign Perm 23 209 15 124 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ED Left * * : NB Left * * Thru * ' Thru * Right * Right Peds Peds W1:3 Left * * ' 313 Left * * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds NB Right Eta Right SB Right WB Right Green 17.OA 36.OA Green 9.OA 17.OA Yellow/A-R 4.0 4.0 Yellow/A- 4.0 4.0 Lost Time 3.0 3.0 Lost Time 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 95.0 secsPhase combination order: tt1 112 1t'5 RF6 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EB L 342 1805 0.31 0.61 6.9 B 12.0 B T 736 1890 0.44 0.39 14.1 B R 626 1607 0.02 0.39 11.5 8 WO L 340 1796 0.30 0.61 19.1 C 27.6 D T 736 1890 0.97 0.39 35.2 D f. 626 1607 0.14 0.39 12.1 C3 NB L 189 1796 0.19 0.33 17.5 C 19.9 C T 358 1890 0.19 0.19 20.9 C R 304 1607 0.16 0.19 20.8 C SO L 189 1796 0.72 0.33 30.1 D 27.1 D T 358 1890 0.67 0.19 25.9 D R 304 1607 0.29 0.19 21.5 C Intersection Delay = 24 .1 sec/veh Intersection LOS : C Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.782 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 06-30-1994 PFLUM. KLAUSMEIER & GEHRUM CONSULTANTS Streets: (E-W) 116th STREET _ ..._._ .- (N-3) GRAY ROAD Analyst: T. FORD File Name: CP2PM.HC9 Area Type: Other 6-29-94 PM PEAK Comment: EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC Eastbound ; Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Volumes 221 666 37 92 383 320 51 279 304 178 85 158 PHF or PK15; 0.85 0.87 0.50 0.81 0.88 0.87 0.81 0.80 0.89 0.87 0.56 0.65 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Grade 0 0 0 0 Heavy Veh 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Parking (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N Bus Stops 0 0 0 0 Con. Peds 0 0 0 0 Ped Button (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N Arr Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3; 3 3 3 RTOR Vols 9 110 125: 70 Prop. Share 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Prop. Prot. Assign Perm 70 27 20 59 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * * NB Left * * Thru * Thru * Right * Right ::{< Peds Peds WB Left * * SB Left * r< Thru * Thru .k Right * Right * Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WO Right Green 12.0A 46.0A Green 9.0A 22.OA Yellow/A-R 4.0 4.0 Yellow/A- 4.0 4.0 Lost Time 3.0 3.0 Lost Time 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 105.0 secsPhase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EB L 223 1805 0.85 0.60 30.4 0 25.9 D T 846 1890 0.91 0.45 25.5 D R 719 1607 0.08 0.45 10.7 8 WB L 222 1796 0.39 0.60 8.9 B 12.6 B T 846 1890 0.51 0.45 13.8 B R 719 1607 0.34 0.45 12.3 8 NB L 171 1796 0.25 0.34 19.0 C 29.5 D T 414 1890 0.84 0.22 34.0 D R 352 1607 0.57 0.22 25.1 D SB L 171 1796 0.85 0.34 46.0 E 32.5 0 T 414 1890 0.37 0.22 22.7 C R 352 1607 0.38 0.22 22.9 C Intersection Delay = 24.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle. L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.824 A-5 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 06-30-1994 PFLUM. KLAUSMEIER & GEHRUM CONSULTANTS Streets: (E-W) 116th STREET (N-S) GRAY ROAD Analyst: T. FORD File Name: CP3AM.HC9 Area Type: Other 6-29-94 AM PEAK Comment: EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS 3 YEARS PLUS SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Volumes 110 307 15 416 721 185 43 72 72 272 236 130 PHF or PK15 0.80 0.81 0.90 0.80 0.87 0.89 0.80 0.92 0.80 0.90 0.85 0.80 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Grade 0 0 0 0 Heavy Veh 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Parking (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N Bus Stops 0 0 0 0 Con. Peds 0 0 0 0 Ped Button (Y/N) N (Y/N) N , (Y/N) N (Y/N) N Arr Type 3 3 3 3 3 3; 3 3 3; 3 3 RTOR Vols 4 80 20: 50 Prop. Share 0 0 0 0 0 0; 0 0 Prop. Prot. Assign Perm 27 306 13 ; 126 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * * NB Left * -* Thru * Thru * Right -* Right * Peds Peds WO Left * * SG Left * * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 15.OA 57.OA Green 12.OA 20.OA Yellow/A-R 4.0 4.0 Yellow/A- 4.0 4.0 Lost Time 3.0 3.0 Lost Time 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secsPhase combination order: 01 112 05 06 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Ad.:j Sat v/c ci/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS - - EB L 241 1805 0.46 0.64 9.3 C3 12.0 B T 914 1890 0.41 0.48 13.1 13 R 777 1607 0.02 0.48 10.4 8 WB L 239 1796 0.89 0.64 35.9 D 28.4 D T 914 1890 0.91 0.48 26.2 D R 777 1607 0.15 0.48 11.2 8 NB L 195 1796 0.21 0.31 23.4 C 26.3 C) T 331 11390 0.24 0.17 27.6 D R 281 1607 0.19 0.17 27.3 C) SB L 195 1796 0.90 0.31 57.6 E 46.6 E T 331 1890 0.84 0.17 41.1 E R 281 1607 0.36 0.17 28.4 D Intersection Delay = 29.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.845 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 06-30-1994 PFLUM. KLAUSMEIER & GEHRUM CONSULTANTS Streets: (E-W) 116th STREET (N-S) GRAY ROAD Analyst: T. FORD File Name: CP3PM.HC9 Area Type: Other 6-29-94 PM PEAK Comment: EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS 3 YEARS PLUS SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R ; L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 ; 1 1 1 1 1 1 Volumes 226 771 40 105 443 370: 57 322 351 206 97 183 PHF or PK15 0.85 0.87 0.80 0.81 0.88 0.8710.81 0.80 0.89 0.87 0.80 0.80 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0; 12.0 12.0 12.0' 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Grade 0 0 0 0 Heavy Veh 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Parking (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N Bus Stops 0 0 0 0 Con. Pods 0 0 0 0 Ped Button (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N Arr Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 RTOR Vols 9 110 125 70 Prop. Share 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Prop. Prot. Assign Perm 62 31 25 63 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 ; 5 6 7 8 EB Left * * : NB Left * * Thru ,k Thru * Right * Right * • Pods Peds WB Left * * SB Left * * • Thru * Thru * Right * Right :t< Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 12.OA 51.OA Green 9.OA 27.OA Yellow/A-R 4.0 4.0 Yellow/A- 4.0 4.0 Lost Time ' 3.0 3.0 Lost Time 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secsPhase combination order: #ti. ##2 #t5 ##6 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS Eli L 204 1805 1.00 0.59 66.2 F 52.0 E T 855 1890 1.04 0.45 49.6 E P 727 1607 0.05 0.45 11.4 13 WB L 203 1796 0.49 0.59 11.7 B 14.7 Ei T 355 1890 0.59 0.45 15.9 C R 727 1607 0.41 0.45 13.9 Et NB L 156 1796 0.29 0.36 20.5 C 32.1 D I 460 1890 0.87 0.24 37.0 0 R 391 1607 0.65 0.24 27.5 D SB L 156 1796 1.11 0.36 131.1 F 74.3 F T 460 1890 0.26 0.24 22.8 C R 391 1607 0.36 0.24 23.5 C Intersection Delay = 40.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS = E Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.940 (}-7 • HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 06-30-1994 PFLUM. KLAUSMEIER & GEHRUM CONSULTANTS ' Streets: (E-W) 116th STREET (N-S) GRAY ROAD Analyst: T. FORD File Name: CP4AM.HC9 Area Type: Other 6-29-94 AM PEAK Comment: EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS 10 YEARS PLUS WATERSTONE PLUS SITE TRAFFIC Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R ' L T R ; L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Volumes 171 458 19 428 1085 282 54 101 101 398 336 226 PHF or PK15 0.85 0.85 0.90 0.85 0.87 0.89 0.85 0.92 0.85 0.90 0.85 0.85 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Grade 0 0 0 0 Heavy Veh 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .1 Parking (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N Bus Stops 0 0 0 0 Con. Peds 0 0 0 0 Ped Button (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N Arr Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 7/ 3 3 3 3 RTOR Vols 4 80 29 50 Prop. Share 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Prop. Prot. ; ; Assign Perm; 40 ; 213 ; 15 ; 90 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * * NB Left * * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds WB Left .k * SB Left * * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds NB Right EB Right S3 Right WB Right Green 15.OA 57.OA Green 12.OA 20.0A Yellow/A-R 4.0 4.0 ; Yellow/A- 4.0 4.0 Lost Time 3.0 3.0 ; Lost Time 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secsPhase combination order: 41 4t2 4Y5 446 • Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EEC L 241 1805 0.67 0.64 15.0 G 15.0 B T 914 1890 0.59 0.48 15.1 C R 777 1607 0.02 0.48 10.5 1:3 WB L 239 1796 1.22 0.64 * * * * T 914 1890 1.37 0.48 * * R 777 1607 0.29 0.43 12.1 B NB L 195 1796 0.25 0.31 23.8 C 27.1 U) T 331 1890 0.33 0.17 28.2 0 R 281 1607 0.30 0.17 28.0 c; 3k3 L 195 1796 1.81 0.31 * * * * T 331 1890 1.19 0.17 138.9 F R 281 1607 0.74 0.17 35.9 D Intersection Delay = * (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = * (g/C)*(V/c) is greater than one. Calculation of D1 is infeasable. A,.8 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 06-30-1994 PFLUM. KLAUSMEIER & GEHRUM CONSULTANTS Streets: (E-W) 116th STREET (N-S) GRAY ROAD Analyst: T. FORD File Name: CP4PM.HC9 Area Type: Other 6-29-94 PM PEAK Comment: EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS 10 YEARS PLUS WATERSTONE PLUS SITE TRAFFIC Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound l_ I R L T R ; L T R ' L T t No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Volumes 412 1163 49 149 671 542 76 458 500 317 137 236 PHF or PK15 0.85 0.87 0.85 0.85 0.88 0a87; 0.85 0.85 0.89 0.87 0.85 0.85 Lane Width ; 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0' 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Grade ' 0 ; 0 0 0 Heavy Veh 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Parking (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N Bus Stops 0 0 0 0 Con. Peds 0 0 0 0 Pod Button (Y/N) N (Y/N) N - (Y/N) N (Y/N) N Arr Type 3 3 3; 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 3 3 RTOR Vols 9; 110, 125 70 Prop. Share 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Prop. Prot. Assign Perm 60 41 25 60 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EB Left * * NO Left * * Thru * Thru * Right * Right 1< Peds Pods WB Left * * SB Left * * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Pods Pods NB Right EB Right SB Right WO Right Green 12.OA 56.OA Green 9.0A 27.0A Yellow/A-R 4.0 4.0 : Yellow/A- 4.0 4.0 Lost Time 3.0 3.0 ; Lost Time 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secsPhase combination order: 01 0,2 tt5 06 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS 1::B L 196 1805 2.17 0.61 * * * * I 898 1890 1.50 0.47 * * R. 763 1607 0.06 0.47 11.0 13 WB L 195 1796 0.69 0.61 18.6 C 20.1 C T 898 1890 0.85 0.47 22.6 C R 763 1607 0.65 0.47 16.7 C NB L 150 1796 0.43 0.34 24.4 C * * T 441 1890 1.22 0.23 * * f-< 375 1607 1.13 0.23 101.3 F 0 L 150 1796 2.03 0.34 * * * * T 441 1890 0.37 0.23 25.1 D R 375 1607 0.68 0.23 29.9 C) Intersection Delay = * (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = * (g/C)*(V/c) is greater than one. Calculation of D1 is infeasable. q 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-.1 i<::K******************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .9 AREA POPULATION 1000000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET DEVELOPMENT DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET GRAY ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST T. FORD DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/vv) 06--30-1994 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT -- 20 0 1..1. I HRU -- 0 135 567 RIGHT ---- 31 7 0 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES -- 2 1 1 A-!D ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND --- --- WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS n COMBINATION AND RV"S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND -- - - -- - WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 C) CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS WB 5.70 5.20 0.00 5.20 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.10 4.60 0.00 4 .60 MINOR LEFTS WB 6.80 6.30 0.00 6.30 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET DEVELOPMENT DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET GRAY ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 06-30-1994 ; AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC A-1I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET WB LEFT 24 334 332 332 307 B RIGHT 38 971 971 971 933 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 13 998 998 998 985 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET DEVELOPMENT DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. _ GRAY ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 06-30-1994 ; AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC A -IL 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Pane-1 *:K******************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .9 AREA POPULATION 1000000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET DEVELOPMENT DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET GRAY ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST T. FORD DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) 06-30-1994 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. _ . . EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT -- 13 0 THRU -- 0 614 179 RIGHT -- 20 24 C) NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES -- 2 1 1. 4-I3 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND _-- - -- WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV"S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND - -- - - WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 �7 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS WB 5.70 5.20 0.00 5.20 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.10 4.60 0.00 4.60 MINOR LEFTS WB 6.80 6.30 0.00 6.30 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET DEVELOPMENT DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET GRAY ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 06-30-1994 PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET WB LEFT 16 275 263 263 248 C RIGHT 24 538 538 538 513 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 43 631 631 631 588 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET DEVELOPMENT DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET GRAY ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 06-30--1994 ; PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC f4'�S 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .9 AREA POPULATION 1000000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET DEVELOPMENT DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET GRAY ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST T. FORD DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) 06-30-1994 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS 3 YEARS GROWTH PLUS SITE TRAFFIC INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T--INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT -- 20 0 1.1 THRU --- 0 156 656 RIGHT -- 31 7 0 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES --- 2 1 1 A"►(4) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS 1/4 COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND _-- ---- --- WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS WB 5. 70 5.20 0.00 5.20 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.10 4.60 0.00 4.60 MINOR LEFTS WB 6.80 6.30 0.00 6.30 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET DEVELOPMENT DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET GRAY ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 06-30-1994 ; AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS 3 YEARS GROWTH PLUS SITE TRAFFIC CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET WB LEFT 24 281 279 279 254 C RIGHT 38 959 959 959 921 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 13 998 998 998 984 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET DEVELOPMENT DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET GRAY ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 06-30-1994 AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS 3 YEARS GROWTH PLUS SITE TRAFFIC 4-18 198S HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************:* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .9 AREA POPULATION 1000000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET DEVELOPMENT DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET GRAY ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST T. FORD DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) 06--30--1994 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS 3 YEARS GROWTH PLUS SITE TRAFFIC INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL. TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT -- 13 0 3"a THRU -- 0 710 207 RIGHT -- 20 24 0 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES - - 2 1 1 • ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND ---- ----- — WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION o. SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND ---- ---- --- WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 () CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS WB 5.70 5.20 0.00 5.20 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5..10 4.60 0.00 4.60 MINOR LEFTS WB 6.80 6.30 0.00 6.30 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET DEVELOPMENT DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET GRAY ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 06-30-1994 ; PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . , EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS 3 YEARS GROWTH PLUS SITE TRAFFIC A- z.o CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- T I AL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET WB LEFT 16 224 214 214 19E3 D RIGHT 24 469 469 469 444 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 43 560 560 .560 517 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET DEVELOPMENT DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET GRAY ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 06-30-1994 - PM PEAK, OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS 3 YEARS GROWTH PLUS SITE TRAFFIC P-21 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 *********'*)K*****'K**)K***'>K*********************'K*Ala**'K***'**********'K' IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .9 AREA POPULATION J000000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET DEVELOPMENT DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET GRAY ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST T. FORD DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) 06-30-1994 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION_ . . . EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS 10 YEARS GROWTH, WATERST ONE, & SITE INTERSECTION TYPE ANC) CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T--INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 20 0 I'HRU -- 0 225 772 RIGHT --- 31 7 0 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES -- 2 1 1 4-Z2— ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND --- --- - WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV"S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND - -- -- -WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS WB 5.70 .5.20 0.00 5.20 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.10 4.60 0.00 4.60 MINOR LEFTS WB 6.80 6.30 0.00 6.30 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET DEVELOPMENT DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET GRAY ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 06-30-1994 „ AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS 10 YEARS GROWTH WATERST ONE, & SITE 4- 2,3 CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET WB LEFT 24 208 206 206 181 D RIGHT 38 895 895 895 857 A MAJOR STREET S8 LEFT 13 984 984 984 970 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET DEVELOPMENT DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET GRAY ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 06-30-1994 ; AM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS 10 YEARS GROWTH, WATERST ONE, & SITE 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************1< IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. , 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .9 AREA POPULATION 100000() NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET DEVELOPMENT DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET GRAY ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST T. FORD DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) O6-30-1994 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS 10 YEARS GROWTH, WATERST ONE, & SITE INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT --- 13 0 3' THRU --- 0 1014 300 RIGHT -- 20 24 0 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES -- 2 1 1. �}-tS • ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND --- --- --- WESTBOUND 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS WB 5.70 5.20 0.00 5.20 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.10 4 .60 0.00 4.60 MINOR LEFTS WB 6.80 6.30 0.00 6.30 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET DEVELOPMENT DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET GRAY ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 06-30-1994 PM PEAK O"MER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS 10 YEARS GROWTH, WATERST ONE, & SITE A-zo CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW-- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET WB LEFT 16 118 110 110 94 E RIGHT 24 312 312 312 288 MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 43 391 391 391 348 B IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET DEVELOPMENT DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET GRAY ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 06-30-1994 ; PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING TRAFFIC PLUS 10 YEARS GROWTH, WATERST ONE, & SITE A-t7