HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication_SetbackSection of UDO being varied from: setback 5.02.B.1-permit accessory strncture to be built with setback as plotted
Engineer: Attorney:
Signature: By typing in my nanu:, I swear that th:: forngoing staknu:nts, and answ::rs h::n:in rnntained and tht": information herewith mbmitt1:d an: in all rcspcds tmc and .;,)fft:d to the best nfmy lmmvledgc and bdid. *Note that required fees are due after the application has received a docket number, and not at the time of application submittal.
Explanation of why variance/waiver is being requested:
The strict application of the terms of the Unified Development to the property will result in practical
difficulties in the use of the property because it will create a disharmonious aesthetic/disrupt the carefully
planned architectural balance of the property as well as significantly reduce the function (of the structure) for
the homeowner. The strict application of the terms of the ordinances WILL result in practical difficulties in the
use of the accessory building.
Constructing the proposed accessory building at an 87.5’ setback from the street (instead of a 95’ setback from
the street) still places the building at an acceptable location and allows for the preservation of a 100+ year old
tree.
Our neighborhood is unique to Carmel with a key characteristic being beautiful mature trees and wildlife.
Removal of this tree will disrupt the aesthetic of the neighborhood and have a negative impact on wildlife.
Laura L. Hartman, Ryan. C. Hartman 06/13/2022