HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes PC 06-21-22 Jeff: Were there discussions what would happen to the remaining lot that won't be developed?Josh: The two other lots
will be become one lot.Jeff: Will lot 3 ever be split?If so,how would you access this lot?Tom Lazzara: It's not our
intent to develop lot 3.The reason we didn't include it in our development because it's a nice big backyard. Potentially a
new alley would be developed to the north and you can gain access to lot 3.
Dubbie: What did Legal Counsel find out the difference between the restrictions on a plat vs on a deed. Sergey
Grechukhin: We are dealing a with a restrictive note,and it's different from a restrictive covenant. It usually has a
grantor and grantee.For this case,the grantor and grantee are the same thing. I'm not sure if we are dealing with a true
restrictive covenant here.It's a restrictive note. I don't read this restrictive note as restricting residential development in
perpetuity.As long as the Petitioner complies with all the applicable governmental restrictions,ordinances,and
regulations,these lots can be developed.
A Motion made by Hill and seconded by Westermeier to approve Docket Nos.PZ-2022-00025 PPA and PZ-2022-
0053 SW.Approved 6-0,absent Grabow,Holle,Zoccola.
New Business:
4. Docket No.PZ-2022-00073 ADLS: Genesis Auto Dealership.
The applicant seeks site plan and design approval for a new auto dealership.(This is the anticipated dealership as
part of the Napleton Auxiliary Lot and Detail Center project—Docket No. PZ-2021-00048 DP/ADLS.)The site is
located at 4240 E. 96th Street. It is zoned B-3Business District. It is not located within any overlay zone. Filed
by Rick Lawrence of Nelson&Frankenberger on behalf of EFN Crossroads Property,LLC.
Petitioner:Jon Dobosiewicz,Nelson&Frankenberger:
• With me tonight is Tim Dimmit of Genesis,and Rick Lawrence of Nelson&Frankenberger
• Presented site location map, site plan,perspective illustrations and elevations
• In 2021,a site plan included an auxiliary lot and detail center.This request is limited to the architecture of the
9,000 sq.ft building and the lighting, landscaping, and signage that will surround it.
• We will work with Planning Staff on our variance request regarding the proposed signage
• We will work with the Urban Forester on the species substitutions for a few trees
Department Report: Rachel Keesling
• The project meets all requirements of the zoning district,except for the proposed signage,which require
variances. The proposed signs meet the size requirements,just the number proposed will need a variance.
• Landscape plan will be updated by switching out tree species that work better adjacent to automobiles
• They meet the minimum parking requirements and lot coverage
• A cool feature of the building will be a skylight over a central atrium/garden area
• The Petitioner provided an updated lighting plan and meets our requirements
• Staff recommends approval at tonight's meeting, subject to the variance approval for the number of signs and that
the Petitioner will address any remaining comments in ProjectDox
Committee Comments:
Kevin: I don't want any employees to park on Randall Drive. When cars get delivered, I don't want the trucks to park on
Randall Drive. Have your contractors leave south,and not north?Tim Dimmit,Genesis: I can agree to these terms.
A Motion made by Hill and seconded by Rider to approve PZ-2022-00073 ADLS contingent upon BZA approvals
and the Petitioner addresses all comments in ProjectDox. Approved 6-0,absent Grabow,Holle,Zoccola.
Meeting Adjourned at 7:12 p.m.
Jl�.hestak PC Secretary Alan Pota ik Vice President
4
Plan Commission Minutes 6-21-22