HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication_Subdivision Variance - Withdrawn SUBDIVISION VARIANCE
REQUEST APPLICATION
Submit two (2) complete copies
Contact Person: Dave Sexton / Schneider Pngr Phone No. 898-8282
Address 3020 N. Post Road, Indpls, IN. 46226
PROJECT NAME: ROSEMEADE COMMONS
PROJECTADDRESS:N. side 116th St. 1600 ' West of Rangeline Rd.
APPLICANT NAME: R.A. Dine Co. Inc.
(Land Owner)
ADDRESS: 11727 Eden Estate Carmel , IN. 46032
PHONE: 844-5097
Section (Section Number, Page, Item) of Subdivision Regulations for which Variance is being
requested.
No.: 6 . 3 . 22 : Installation of Accel/Decel & Passing Blister
Pages:
State explanation of why Variance is being requested:
To eliminate passing blister and reduce width of Decel lane
State reasons supporting Variance request:
Appropraite Right of Way not availabip
Present Zoning: R-1 /6M.f Q• �A'�r,►4{�'
(Signature r)—
THIS APPLICATION MUST BE SUBMITTED AT THE TIME OF THE PRMARY PLAT
APPLICATION. VARIANCE REQUEST MUST BE INCLUDED WTH THE PUBLIC
NOTICE FOR THE PRIMARY PLAT.
9/23/91 APPLICATION FEE $
CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION
Carmel, Indiana
Docket No.: 4 4 — 9 1 PP
Petitioner: R . A . D i n e C o .
Section Variance: 6 . 3 . 22
Brief Description of Variance: Ins t a 1 1 o f r e qu z r e d d e c e 1 1 ari e .
In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of
a variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following:
— — The grant of a variance will not be injurious to public health, safety, morals and
general welfare of the community.
— — The use or value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will
not be affected in a substantially adverse manner.
— — The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and
such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood.
— — The strict application of terms of the ordinance will constitute an unusual and
unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought.
— — The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the Comprehensive Plan.
Based on all the evidence presented by the petitioner, I approve of the requested
subdivision variance.
I hereby disapprove the subdivision variance request for the following reasons:
1.
2.
3.
Dated this 17 day of December 1991.
Commission Member
#1066.ghs