Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes COM 06-07-22 Committee Comments: Kevin:Are you adding parking or does it exist.Jordan: The parking exists.Kevin: Can they give up the 8 spots? Rachel: Yes,they can.They are over-parked. Depending on which way you look at it,they either have an excess of 37 spaces or 14 spaces. So,the use of 8 spaces won't impact parking. Dubbie: Looks like there is terrace seating at the GetGo,patio tables with umbrellas, so in my opinion that would be the only visual vantage point where you would care about what you are looking at,but between landscaping and necessary screening if you choose to have it(I am not advocating),to me that is the only vantage point where it would even be an issue. I did ask about underground burial of the equipment,they said that is not an option. Hill: Since you brought it up,can you explain for the record,why is it not feasible to put it underground?Jordan: Yes, it comes back to the equipment clearance,just like any piece of commercial equipment we need to have access and it would probably cost more than the entire rest of the project to engineer a full structure underground. If required it would be done,but not required per any code or ordinance. We will screen it and once it's there it is like any other kind of transformer. Kevin: Make a motion to approve with two contingencies, one that you work it out with our UF,no negotiation what he says you plant,and that you work it out with Staff as far as the aesthetics of the trashcan.Jordan: Just to clarify there is an existing landscaping plan in the PUD for the whole development, is that what he will recommend?Kevin:No,he will recommend what he wants you to surround it with, it has zero to do with the existing landscaping.It will exceed it,because this is a new item which allows us to amend the previous plan. Rachel: We always want you to check that nothing has died and if something has died it should be replaced. These would be arborvitae or something that would eventually grow tall and screen the area.Jordan: We don't own the property, so we will have to work with GetGo for approval. Discussion by Kevin: have we ever considered a fence?It would be an instant screen and easy to maintain. Would that be an option for you?Jordan: We are open to that.We could do a screening fence,potentially from one or two sides,doing a full enclosure is something we try to avoid because it just ends up taking a lot of space and we have to re-orient equipment to make sure we maintain all those access areas. Kevin: If it was three sided would that work for you?Rachel: Possibly.Jordan: Are there specific ordinances or requirements regarding screening equipment?Rachel: It's an either/or,but I will need to double check The Bridges PUD to see if there is something specific.Jordan: We will comply with any of that. Alan: Will this be an issue with the Forester?Rachel: We will work it out.Alan: Alright, it is up to them. A Motion made by Kevin Rider and seconded by Jeff Hill to approve Docket No.PZ-2022-00067 ADLS Amend subject to complying with the Urban Forrester and Staffs requirements and recommendation on the equipment screening and trashcan of their liking. Approved 4-0. 2. Docket No.PZ-2022-00069 ADLS Amend:Juniper on Main-Deck expansion. The applicant seeks design approval for an expansion of their outdoor seating area on the west side of the building.The site is located at 110 E. Main Street. It is zoned B-1/Business and is in the Character Sub-Area of the Old Town Overlay.Filed by Corrie Sharp(Meyer)on behalf of Kenny Keltner. Petitioner: Corrie Sharp(Meyer) Kenny was not able to be present due to a family health emergency,so I am standing in for him.He is the owner of Juniper on Main property,and his son operates it. They want to expand a wood deck to the north along 1st Ave and continue the aesthetic as it wraps around the building. He is planning on adding four 2-top tables,three 4-top tables and one 6-top table for a total of 26 persons.There was a question about the actual width of the lawn area compared to drawing and drawing is correct. There is adequate space for the 12ft-wide deck. Department Report: Rachel Keesling It is a simple wood deck.We are ok with landscape width. The deck will be at the same height as the exiting one, so you will be able to walk across. Kevin: the waiting areas area going to connect across. Rachel: It will have 2 Commercial Committee Minutes 6-7-22 railing that matches the exiting railing. The fence will be gone,and it will fill in this space and follow the same railing and spindle pattern.It will have some string lights hung-up across the top. 12 feet by 34.There will still be some grass area up there at the top,they will not impact the icicle parking racks up there.Corrie:we double checked the sign locations,and the sign will not need to be moved. Rachel:No landscaping will be changed.We addressed the signage question. They received a Variance for lot coverage for the existing conditions—more so around the existing condition that was already there—and when they added the big patio out front. Because this is a wood deck it will not count against their lot coverage so they can do this without negatively impacting what is there or the existing variance. We are in support of adding this. Committee Comments: Kevin: Do we have final approval?Rachel: yes. It is just an ADLS Amendment. A Motion made by Kevin Rider and seconded by Dubbie Buckler to approve Docket No. PZ-2022-00069 ADLS Amend. Approved 4-0. 3. WITHDRAWN: Docket No.PZ-2022-00070 ADLS Amend:Jiffy Lube—Mural/Public Art. The applicant seeks design approval to change out the existing mural/public art currently applied to the north façade of the Jiffy Lube building. The site is located at 1270 S. Range Line Rd. and is zoned I-1 within the Cannel Drive/Range Line Rd. Overlay Zone.Filed by Julia Muney Moore of the Arts Council of Indianapolis on behalf of the owner, Steve Sanner. 4. TABLED to JULY 5: PZ-2022-00034 ADLS Amend: Circle K Rebrand—College Plaza. The applicant seeks approval for signage and brand modifications/updating. The site is located at 10598 College Ave. It is zoned B-1/Business and is located in the Homeplace Business Sub-Area Overlay District. Filed by Amy Leska of Corporate Identification Solutions on behalf of the owner. 5. TABLED to JULY 5: PZ-2022-00036 ADLS Amend: Circle K Rebrand. The applicant seeks approval for signage and brand modifications/updating. The site is located at 545 S. Rangeline Road. It is zoned B-1/Business and is located in the Rangeline Road Overlay District.Filed by Amy Leska of Corporate Identification Solutions on behalf of the owner. 6. WITHDRAWN: PZ-2022-00033 ADLS Amend: Ozwell Fitness. The applicant seeks approval for the remodel and expansion of the former Williams Comfort Air building for a new fitness facility. The site is located at 1077 3rd Avenue SW.It is zoned I-1/Industrial and is not located within any overlay district.Filed by David Gilman of Land Development Services on behalf of the owner. Meet' ado ed PM. iza Shalit Recording Secretary Alan Po nik Committee Chairman 3 Commercial Committee Minutes 6-7-22