HomeMy WebLinkAbout06050073 Correspondence
Lillard, Sarah N
(&6"m:' ';Aker~,:Wi1n~~.~
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 12:28 PM
To: Lillard, Sarah N
Subject: RE: Address Problem
Page 1 of 1
Sarah,
~went"apead"1'iRCl"Changea'15t-39 to reflect.!:!7.7~~~.i1ie:address.:l:iere;isJhe:attached-file;.;dJ
Bill
From: Lillard, Sarah N
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 3:58 PM
To: Akers, William P
Subject: Address Problem
Importance: High
Bill,
I noticed today when I went to enter some permit records for the Traditions on the Monon project, that some of the
addresses had been changed. I was able to find your revised email from November of last year, which updated
the entire subdivision. Since the addresses had already been merged into our system, I have had to re-update
based on your later list.
HOWEVER, I noticed that lot 39's street # falls inconsistently for the building, based on your list. On your list, you
have the lots in the building as follows:
Lot 37: 993
Lot 38: 985
Lot 39: 997
Lot 40: 969
Lot 41: 961
Lot 42: 953
Should lot 39 be 977? That number makes sense. (8 lower than lot 38's number, and 8 higher than lot 40's
number) If so, who do you need to inform about the address correction?
Let me know.
Thanks,
Sarah
5/12/2006