Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrder Of Dismissal Of Summerlakes/Deerfield Defendants 10-17-22FILED October 17, 2022 CLERK OF THE HAMILTON CIRCUIT COURT STATE OF INDIANA ) SS: COUNTY OF HAMILTON ) ASHERWOOD CARMEL, LLC Plaintiff, V. TODD E. KATZ, ET AL. Defendants. IN THE HAMILTON SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 29D05-2106- PL-003911 ORDER DISMISSING SUMMERLAKES/DEERFIELD GROUP DEFENDANTS AND APPROVING DISCLAIMER Plaintiff, Asherwood Carmel, LLC ("Plaintiff'), by counsel, and defendants Christopher J. Savage, Patti C. Savage, David W. Funke, Jane B. Funke, Jonathan S. Courchaine, Kenneth R. Blankenberger, Marianne Erler, Sidney Dunn, Linda C. Dunn, James Allen Redelman, Michelle Lynn Redelman, Gregory Brent Corn, Gail Kathryn Corn, Lawrence G. Falender, Susan L. Falender, Michael Momcilovich, Bridget G. Momcilovich, Gordon Brooks, Angela C. Brooks, Evan D. Bedel, Abbe Bedel, Frederick D. Emhardt, Cynthia L. Emhardt, Alexander G. Godfrey, Patricia E. Godfrey, Martin L. Milgrom, and Lesley B. Milgrom(collectively "Summerlakes/Deerfield Group Defendants"), by counsel, and the Summerlakes Property Owners Association, Inc. ("Summerlakes POA" ), by counsel, have filed "Joint Disclaimer and Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice By the Plaintiff and 1 the Summerlakes/Deerfield Group Defendants" ("Joint Disclaimer and Stipulation"). And the Court, being duly advised, based on the consideration recited in the Joint Disclaimer and Stipulation, including Exhibit 1 and Exhibit 2 attached thereto, hereby DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the Summerlakes Deerfield Group Defendants, the Summerlakes POA, and any other defendants who have stipulated to dismissal, and finds that all defendants named in the litigation have either been defaulted or dismissed disclaiming their right to contest the prayer for relief in the Plaintiff's complaint and therefore ORDERS: 1. All portions of the "Restricted Property" as defined in the Complaint, including Defendants' Parcels, each Individual Parcel, and Plaintiff's Property are released from the 75 foot Setback Restriction set forth in the Complaint and are bound instead to the restrictions set forth in Exhibit 1 of the Joint Disclaimer and Stipulation. 2. Plaintiff will not be in violation of the Covenants identified in the Complaint by developing, constructing, or permitting the construction on Plaintiff's Property of single family dwellings that have front yard setbacks of less than seventy five feet (75'), as long as all such development and/or construction complies with the front yard setback of forty feet (40') as required by the City of Carmel Zoning Ordinance and Exhibit 1 of the Joint Disclaimer and Stipulation, and the lot sizes are not less than one full acre in area. 2 b}ttttese 6RIOR Dated: 10/16/2022 The Honorable DAd jai° Judge, Hamilton Su eitior .C;�u , , Room No. i� Copies to: Counsel of Record